SWOT ANALYSIS
Lesson Plan
School : Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri Sakatiga Indralaya
Curriculum : KTSP
Strengths
-The format of each component in the RPP is neatly - The teaching-learning media is not stated in the
arranged, more over the subheading of each
components is typed in bold and clear font and
numbering (using capital letter).
-All the components that should be listed in the
lesson plan are almost completely mentioned.
(identities of the lesson plan, objectives,
teaching-learning materials, learning method, - The main activities in teaching procedure of the
teaching procedure, sources, assessment, and
signatures of the school principal and the
English teacher)
-The identities of lesson plan are completely stated
in terms of the name of the school, the subject,
class/semester, standard competence, indicator,
type of the text, skill which being taught, and
time allocation.
-The standard competence, basic competence,
indicator, and the objective as the main focus in
generating the lesson plan are in line/based on
the syllabus.
-The teaching-learning materials are evidently -
adequate because they are attached clearly on
the lesson plan.
-The sources are completed by the clear reference
books
Opportunities
-The format of each component in this lesson plan is - Although the teaching-materials are attached on
neatly arranged, therefore this lesson plan is
mostly readable and understood by almost
parties, not only for the teacher.
-All the components that should be listed in the
lesson plan are almost completely mentioned
Weaknesses
lesson plan.
- There are some inappropriate bullets/
numberings typed in the lesson plan. For
example, for the indicator and for the steps in
teaching procedures.
lesson plan are not in detail to cover the main
process/activities based on the objectives. The
activities are too simply typed. Since there are 3
texts used for teaching-learning materials, there
is not such information whether the students
need to read all those texts or only choose one
of them. Moreover, on the same terms, the part
of siswa mendengarkan model membaca
nyaring, this sentence is not clear explained and
understood (ambiguous) on this lesson plan in
which the teacher provides a kind of listening
media which need to be listened by the students
or there is a model whether the teacher or
student will read the texts.
The use of rubric for the reading assessment of
the lesson plan is too generous, in other words
it is not quite detail to assess the students
reading aloud performance.
Threats
the lesson plan, but the media used is still
questioned. Therefore, it might reflect to the
teaching-learning process which probably leads
to the chaos in applying this lesson plan in
classroom. The unequipped media used might
-The identities of lesson plan are clearly stated, so decrease the students interest in learning
that process, therefore the terminal objectives from
this lesson plan is most likely obstructed.
- Inappropriate of the use of bullets and
numbering in writing this kind of formal lesson
plan might impress a negative perspective from
the ones (authorized people; school principal,
educational department team, accreditation
team) who check this lesson plan which tend to
decrease the point in assessing this lesson plan.
It might look like that the teacher here is not
that serious in generating this lesson plan.

- Since the main activities in teaching procedure

is not in detail, the tendency of mess teaching
process probably happen.

- The rubric provided in this lesson plan is too

generous, the score distribution would not be
various since there is only four possible scores
(100,90,80,70). The distribution of reading
aloud aspects are not categorized properly in
the rubric of the lesson plan, so that the
possibility of getting the unfair score might
ensue