The purpose of this cover letter is to illustrate my progress in meeting the courses Student Learning Outcomes. I will provide examples of assignments that represent my competence in meeting the six SLOs; rhetorical focus, ethical research, persuasive arguments, organization and focus, academic language and design, and collaboration. The discussion board assignments, specifically DB #2, demonstrate my understanding of the SLOs of organization/focus and academic language/design. For example, I correctly identify successful elements of organization and design that have parallels in the three Wikipedia pages, The three similar characteristics of organization that are most apparent include the introduction paragraph, table of contents, and a picture. As well, my understanding of academic language is shown by identifying the writing style and the similarities between the Wikipedia pages, All three pages share a similar writing style convention, that being one of a formal reporter. From what I can tell, the author's of the articles attempt to provide facts, and only facts, to their readers. The discussion board assignments also stand as strong examples of meeting the SLO of collaboration throughout the semester. For example, in DB #9, I provided an alternative form of a classmates argument that helped to accomplish their goal, an example of an appropriate thesis may be, The topic of the death penalty is one that is contested among Americans, however a majority of them support it. It is for the reasons of [] that the majority of Americans support the death penalty. This is an appropriate thesis because it presents for readers a clear understanding of what the paper will be about.
The ethical issue prompt best represents my accomplishment
of the persuasive argument SLO. Addressing opposing arguments is key to a successful persuasive argument, and the following quote from my prompt is an example of this, Proponents of HGE argue that the technology can be used to solve the problems associated with certain genetic diseases, if not cure the diseases altogether [] however to apply this research to humans introduces a bevy of problems. First, I introduced an opposing view and then countered the claim; the use of however indicates the distinction between arguments. This assignment also represents success in meeting the ethical research SLO. Upon reviewing the sources, it is clear that they are discipline appropriate because of the use of scientific journals. The discussion board assignments also provide examples of meeting the SLO of rhetorical focus. For example, in DB #3, the discussion of plagiarism is in the context of college courses with an audience of college students. This exemplifies an understanding of rhetorical focus because I first had to focus on what I wanted to accomplish in my discussion, then I had to understand my audience to formulate a argument relevant to the context of discussion. Understanding the audience is paramount in a successfully written argument. If I were presenting this argument to elementary schools students instead of college students, the writing style and context used would have changed for sure. Despite my successes in meeting the SLOs, there are aspects where I do need to make improvements. An example a shortcoming in the ethical research SLO lies in the ethical issue prompt in which I employed the incorrect use of in-text citation. It does not match the requirement called for by the MLA writing style. Another example of a shortcoming in the collaboration SLO is that of DB #12, the peer review of editorials. I do not believe I contributed to the improvement of my peers work because I failed to provide sufficient constructive criticisms that my peer may have used to revise his editorial. I have trouble providing criticisms because sometimes I do not have faith in my own writing styles, so I question my ability to to provide effective criticism. I hope that understanding my weaknesses as well as my strengths will help me improve my writing style as a college student.