Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

policy sheet

Biodiversity conservation in regional NRM


planning
Research project number VRA1 of the Social and Institutional Research Program of Land & Water Australia.
Completed: 2003.

A research outcome that you How can you use the guidelines?
can use • They provide an accessible list of key
success factors for integration of biodiversity
This project looks at enhancing biodiversity conservation in regional planning covering
conservation in regional NRM planning. It has motivation, financial and regulatory factors and
produced practical guidelines that will be useful also identify barriers and limitations.
to a wide range of policy-makers and resource • They make practical recommendations for
managers. action by governments and on-ground resource
managers.
The requirement for biodiversity conservation is
recognised in planning processes for NRM regions • The recommendations and success factors/
within Australian states and territories although it limitations will be instructive in regional
is often not attributed with high priority. This project planning policy development, target-setting and
set out to identify mechanisms to enhance the regional management action.
adoption of biodiversity conservation within regional • The large number of case studies written in
NRM planning processes. The project was funded succinct, accessible language included in the
through the Natural Heritage Trust and managed final research report, provide real life context
by Land & Water Australia through the Social and for lessons learned in regional planning.
Institutional Research Program.

artwork: Annie Franklin, 2000.


How was the knowledge • Biodiversity conservation does not have a
strong ‘market-base’. There is strong interest
developed? in trials of market-based mechanisms, however
there is also scepticism about whether these
This project identifed where biodiversity has been options will achieve the required change at
effectively included within regional NRM planning the landscape scale and be maintained in
processes and established an understanding of the perpetuity. Considering this, motivational
critical success factors required for biodiversity and regulatory mechanisms will continue to
conservation. be required. Building of community interest
and values at the landscape scale will be
Information to assess opportunities and an important prerequisite for achieving the
mechanisms for biodiversity conservation in NRM required landscape-scale change in a ‘non-
planning was derived from a ‘project scan’ including market’ environment as many community-based
150 projects, as well as semi-structured interviews actions are site specific.
with relevant people in each state or territory
• A mix of mechanisms for biodiversity
and a range of NRM regions. The assessment
conservation will continue to be required, but
was used to assess key project initiatives in each
there are increasing expectations that market
jurisdiction, identify and document 16 case studies
mechanisms will become widely adopted. There
and to determine the critical success factors for
is a need to clarify the benefits derived from
biodiversity conservation in those areas.
biodiversity conservation and to better develop
the market base for these benefits.
Can I rely on it? • There is an increasing number of private and
commercial initiatives developing with benefits
The method of research adopted is appropriate for biodiversity conservation, however many
for a national overview project with the intent of encounter disincentives or other administrative
identifying general trends suitable for developing difficulties.
recommendations about future investment for
biodiversity conservation outcomes. The significant
Understanding biodiversity values and
number of regions scanned and multiple case
studies provide a significant database from which threats
characteristics of effective biodiversity conservation • The concepts of biodiversity conservation are
in different contexts can be drawn. not clearly understood within regions. Most
have a general understanding but not at a
level that evokes the appropriate priorities for
Key findings investment and management. State/territory
agencies, research organisations and NGO’s
Values, priorities and cultures have well-developed skills and information that
• The major issues of salinity and water quality could assist with regional understanding of
are often considered ahead of biodiversity biodiversity conservation, especially regarding
issues and the opportunities for integrated what it is, what can be done to protect/recover
management to achieve multiple outcomes are values, and what can be expected from investing
not always adopted. in management.
• Resources for biodiversity conservation should • Threats to biodiversity conservation are
be targeted to regions with high conservation considered to be reasonably well understood
value. It has been common for resources by most regions, however threat abatement is
to be placed with regions that have high not often undertaken in a strategic way at the
community motivation but not necessarily high landscape scale.
conservation value.
Managing landscapes and regional Capacity for regional biodiversity
ecosystems conservation
• Most information and many mechanisms • Effective biodiversity conservation initiatives
currently encourage small-scale, site-specific within NRM regions are well lead. Leadership
management. While there is an expectation can be effective at a range of levels, including
that biodiversity conservation management from state/local governments.
will be undertaken at a landscape scale, there
• Performance measurement of projects focus
is inadequate institutional support to do so.
on time efficiency rather than on outcomes
Information and assistance should be focused
efficiency. Most regions emphasised the
at this scale. Biodiversity conservation is
importance of allowing time for trust to be built
more effective in regions where information is
and projects to evolve. In addition, funding needs
available and compatible with this scale.
to be available when it is needed for the project,
• Many NRM regional boundaries do not and this does not always coincide with periodic
correspond well with regional ecosystems. Most funding cycles.
were formed on a surface water catchment
basis but ecological boundaries differ. Most
regions have not initiated cross-jurisdictional Further information
management.
To arrange a more detailed policy briefing contact:
Information and knowledge management Social and Institutional Research Program
• Most effective biodiversity conservation Coordinator
projects have integrated appropriate science Land & Water Australia
with management. This requires associating GPO Box 2182 Canberra ACT 2601
science-based information with local knowledge
and values. However, the success of integrating Phone: (02) 6263 6029
science with management is most often where Facsimile: (02) 6263 6099
there is a receptive community more than where Web: www.lwa.gov.au
there is a priority for biodiversity conservation
management. To obtain the full research report see:
• Information required for integrated www.lwa.gov.au/sirp
management of ecosystems is commonly
not compatible and is derived from different For technical information about the project
sources. Strategic arrangements for biodiversity contact the principal researcher:
conservation need to be better correlated at
international, state, regional and local scales. Viv Read
There is a requirement to identify the range of Viv Read & Associates NRM Consultants
values within a region, from international to
local, and to manage strategically to maximise Phone: (08) 93862446
benefit to the range of values. Mobile: 0421 025 600
Email: vivread@wiredcity.com.au
• Most regions had limited knowledge or had
made only limited use of national datasets and
biodiversity conservation tools. The full value of
national databases is not recognised and there
would be benefit in improving understanding of
these datasets by regional organisations for use
in strategic regional planning.