Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(2) Write a short article (1000 to 1250 words) for readers who lack your technical expertise but are curious
about how engineers strive to prevent failures. You should:
Explain for a non-engineering audience why/how your structure failed: incorporate your knowledge of
the statics concepts you have been learning about in class, like loads, forces, moments, etc.
Discuss the ethical failure(s) that led to the structural collapse.
In light of your research and your reading of the Petroski article, reflect on the broader ethical
implications of this disaster. What responsibilities do engineers face in the design and maintenance of
structures?
Include at least one figure (with citation and caption) to enhance your discussion.
Your essay should combine an analysis of the structural failure with a discussion of the ethical
situation engineers faced either before, during and/or after the disaster. Answer this question:
Where do we go from here?
(3) You must cite at least three credible sources (one source can be Petroski) and include a References page
in APA format; do not cite Wikipedia its anonymously written articles lack credibility.
Continued on back
Format Guidelines
Title page: Center and double-space. Include a line for each of the following: Full title of the essay, your
name, course name and section number, professors name, and due date.
Your paper should be double-spaced, 12 pt. Times New Roman font, 1 inch margins on all sides. Add page
numbers to your document.
For APA guidelines (in-text citations and References page), consult the Purdue Online Writing Lab:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
DUE DATE:
submit your essay
to ICON by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, June 17