The Registrar

European Court of Human Rights

Council of Europe
F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex
+33 (0)3 88 41 39 00

Rule 39 Urgent
Date and time of urgency: They will detain me illegally as they did on 6th and 10th of April
2017 to falsify procedures for 4909/231/2017 regarding involuntary psychiatric commitment,
planning to commit me psychiatrically illegally during orthodox Easter, as they attempted on 13th,
14th then again on 27th of April 2017. My mothers apartment was broken into almost every day
and has fallen ill with Zoster Area from stress and trauma. They tried all this before but I won in
court in 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015. I am innocent - never convicted
since 2014 when they begun falsifying penal files against me reaching currently four, using and
old communist method of wrongful repression - (1) falsify penal files against the undesirable, (2)
detain the undesirable making him vulnerable, (3) instigate an inmate or mental patient to harm
or kill the undesirable. Theyve already instigated an interloper to kill me on 05.12.2014 who also
tried on 27.10.2014 and theyve falsified all the penal and civil resolutions Ive made against the
interloper afterwards
This problem degenerated since ECHR case 60113/12 of Mr. Grosu Ulise vs Romania,
who was also illegally detained in so-called European province Vrancea mafia in an attempt to
psychiatrically commit him

Nature of urgency: flagrant breaking of the articles 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14 from the

Convention meaning certainty of illegal loss of freedom, risk to life or of torture, inhuman or
degrading punishment or treatment, ill-treatment or other serious harm, risk of social
exclusion, risk of a flagrant denial of justice, risk to private and family life, health and
conditions of detention, right to a fair trial and legal representation

Person to contact (name and contact details):

Raneti Mariana (indirect victim, my mother), address: bd. Unirii 28, sc. 1, ap. 5, Focsani,
Vrancea, Romania, mobile phone: 0743003433 (not an English speaker)
Raneti Tudor (direct victim, author of present request for interim measures), chosen
address for communication of acts of procedure is my electronic correspondence address:
tudor.raneti@gmail.com. If my email is not admissible, please use my mother's address

A. I the applicant, according to ECHR bureaucracy:

Surname (family name): Raneti

Page 1 of 37
 First name: Tudor Andrei
Date of birth: 10/10/1980
Place of birth: Focsani, Vrancea, Romania
Nationality: Romanian
Address: (I do not live there nor receive correspondence, use my mothers address for
postal correspondence), bd. Theodor Pallady, nr. 2, bl. M2A, sc. B, et. 6, apt. 61, sector 3,
Bucharest, Romania
Email: tudor.raneti@gmail.com
Sex: male

B. State(s) against which the application is directed

ROU - Romania

formulate in accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights this

REQUEST FOR INTERIM MEASURES

that ECHR will urgently mandate that Romania will repeal article 184 from Romanian
Code of penal procedure and similar articles like 240, 245-248, 521 (2) a), 566-573 regarding
medical unjustified measures against suspects and the accused that are first of all benefiting
from the presumption of innocence, and that are usually without legal and factual justification.
The so-called magistrates in so-called European province Vrancea are using the judicial system
and psychiatry as an weapon of wrongful repression against me and others, proven flagrantly by
the fact theyre contradicting the presumption of innocence by targeting suspects and accused
which are innocent until proven guilty in accordance with article 6.2 from the European
convention of human rights, and of course article 4 and article 99 from Romanian Penal
procedure code as well as art. 23 paragraph 11 from Romanian Constitution. Medicine cant be
used as a punitive measure or without the consent of the subject of the so called medical
measure, being against the fundamental rights to life and personal security as well against
medical oath and deontology

Summary
Page 3 - I. Abstract - case in attention that demands urgent attention.
Page 6 - THE URGENCY
Page 8 - A POSSIBLE URGENT SOLUTION
Page 12 - II. Base case - a resume of the origin of this illicit situation.
Page 15 - III. STATEMENT OF ALLEGED VIOLATION(S) OF THE
CONVENTION AND/OR PROTOCOLS AND OF RELEVANT ARGUMENTS
Page 34 - IV. Inventory or proofs and short description
Page 35 - V. Damage claims

Page 2 of 37
I. Case in attention that demands urgent attention - abstract.

Police and gendarmes illegally arrested me by repeatedly breaking into my mother's

apartment where I was intending to spend orthodox Easter in family. The police and gendarmes
detained me using evident falsified mandates and forcefully and repeatedly brought me to a
psychiatric commission for nothing - I am innocent as I prove anyway below in several ways.
I was deprived of liberty illegally and arbitrarily the 1st time on 09.17.2015 and held 7
hours, the 2nd time on 12.11.2015 and held 3 hours, the 3rd time on 04.06.2017 and held 2
hours, the 4th time on 04.10.2017 and held 2 hours and on 04.10.2017 they've falsified another
involuntary psychiatric commitment decision in file 4909/231/2017 identical to
11224/231/2015 (breaking ne bis idem principle), with which they can illegally arrest me and
commit me psychiatrically any time.
The decision in 4909/231/2017 was never communicated to me but I can prove it exists
and is illegal nevertheless - 4909/231/2017 is the unique number in ECRIS informatics system
accessible on all Romanian courthouse internet sites where a summary of the public sentence can
be found by googling: site:.ro judecatoria focsani without the quotes, then searching the file
number with cautare dosare option, or see proof #1 from the contestation of 4909/231/2017
decision where a so-called judge aberrantly demands I prove Im not mentally alienated. That is
the only relevant address I got for now from 4909/231/2017, because they refuse to give me
access to penal files and all dossiers to impede me presenting paper proofs
4909/231/2017 is identical to 11224/231/2015 because it is falsified by breaking the
same laws and both are based on same fictional and aberrant accusations that Im violent and
lacking consciousness. I've annulled the decision in 11224/231/2015 from courthouse
Judecatoria Focsani as unfounded in contestation in 11224/231/2015 at courthouse
"Tribunalul Vrancea" courthouse, therefore the principle ne bis idem is applicable proving
4909/231/2017 is also unfounded
Police and gendarmes threatened my mother to illegally break into her house every
day on 13th, 14th and 27th of April 2017, even if as I said since 2014 to them that I am not
domiciled there, meaning they were harassing my family to black mail me. I was at my mothers
to spend orthodox Easter in family which means the grave abuses they perpetrated in these two
weeks exactly before Easter is no coincidence - they planned for me to spend Easter
psychiatrically committed illegally as I will prove below, most probably attempting to harm me
after putting me in a situation of vulnerability by detention, because Im seeking justice in the
Romanian judicial system for their felonies against me. Simultaneously they attempted to censor
my internet publications as they did with militia.freeforums.net and tried with my facebook.com
account, to stop me from making their crimes public, which is also why they committed the grave
abuses on Easter when people are preoccupied with family not public affairs
I provide a short demonstration of the illegality of all the psychiatrically profiled acts of
procedure used in the illegal arrests and falsified judgments in 15730/231/2014,

Page 3 of 37
10547/231/2015, 11224/231/2015, 14277/231/2015, 4791/231/2017 and 4909/231/2017 that
the so-called prosecutors are using:
1. All judicial motivations are syllogisms, based on the facts particular premise and the
universal law premise
2. Because the particular facts premise is negligible if the law is broken invalidating the
syllogism, I abstract the particular facts premise, thus the demonstration from a syllogistic
inference becomes a categorical inference - premise (law) -> conclusion (legal / illegal motivation)
3. because according to article 184 from Romanian Penal code of procedure only the
suspect or accused of homicide or infanticide can be sent to be psychiatrically examined, I cant
be legally psychiatrically examined because Im wrongfully accused of ~disturbing the solemnity
of courthouse meeting (2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016) and before that was
wrongfully suspected of ~offending a magistrate (2417/P/2014) which is an aberration because
I wasnt accused of an actual penal offence against a magistrate, as offending a magistrate is an
aggravation of an existing penal offence not a penal offence
According to the Romanian Penal procedure code any doubt is to be interpreted in the
favor of the suspect or accused, thus if theres a so called doubt that the suspect or accused is
mentally deranged, which in my case I call the prosecutors hallucination because its 100%
unfounded, theres a complementary doubt that the suspect or accused is mentally sane, thus the
doubt is to be interpreted that the suspect or accused is mentally sane according to article 4
paragraph 2 of the Romanian Penal procedure code regarding the presumption of innocence,
however I regard article 184 paragraph 1 from Romanian Penal procedure code as a list of
conditions where the investigators doubt cant be the sole reason for starting a psychiatric
investigation, but also the conditions that the case be about homicide or infanticide must be also
fulfilled because the legal logical proposition used the conjunction not the disjunction and thats
what it means by propositional and juridical logic
In conclusion the psychiatric procedures dont apply to me thus all the consequent
psychiatrically profiled acts of procedure are illegal, not to mention theyre suppose to subpoena
me before they detain me for the false reason that Ive refused to present myself when
summoned, reason that can only be valid if I received a subpoena and didnt present myself
4. According to article 184 paragraph 3 from Romanian Penal code of procedure only the
suspect or accused who give their free written consent after theyve been informed and
documented themselves on the law can be psychiatrically examined. Because I havent given my
written consent, no papers can be legally made that I be psychiatrically examined, so
in conclusion the procedures dont apply to me so all the consequent papers are illegal. I
corroborate with articles 10 and 11 from Romanian Law 487/2002 regarding mental sanity that
state the examination is only done through an interview which obviously is impossible without my
consent, and my consent is to be given freely after Im documented with all the facts and juridical
implications, thus no coercion can be involved
5. according to article 184 paragraph 4 from Romanian Penal code of procedure, only if
the suspect or accused gave his consent and then refuses to present himself to the psychiatric
examination when summoned, he can be brought by force according to this article that I also
regard as an unconstitutional aberration -medicine or quackery as psychiatry is cant be

Page 4 of 37
forced on anyone with or without his consent by medical oath and deontology which of course
means it cant be used as punishment, and the so called psychiatric treatment through medication
is chemical lobotomisation and unscientific at the same time as its statistically not curing the
metaphorical mental illness but it changes symptoms for other worse symptoms from physical
damage done by psychiatric drugs.
6. Last but not least, suspects and accused are innocent until proven guilty according to
articled 4 and 99 from Romanian Penal procedure code, article 23 paragraph 11 from Romanian
Constitution, and of course article 6.2 from the Convention , which means no deed penal or not
can be associated with me until Im proven guilty, therefore no inference can be made that Im
mentally insane because I havent done anything illicit or even immoral
7. the particular premise I abstracted refers to:
7.1. the authority of already made judgment on the matter - ne bis idem between
4909/231/2017 and 11224/231/2015, because Im accused of fictive facts that dont constitute
penal offences even fictively, then the judgment is made using these fictional penal accusations in
both dossiers which implies ne bis idem. This alone is ground of annulment of judgment in
4909/231/2017
7.2. I havent been notified of the content of 4909/231/2017 and been deliberately
restricted the right to plea in my defense, by the gendarmes who arrested me and delivered me
at the last possible moment in court and refusing to communicate to me the mandate for my
detainment and even stole two pencils so I dont write my own report on the spot and build a
defense, and by the judge who refused to subpoena me according to article 184 paragraph 8 from
the Romania Penal procedure code previously of falsifying the detainment mandate, then the
same judge verbally stated in court that hes restricting my right to plea, all of this in breach of
my guaranteed right to defend myself. My state lawyer was corrupt and did not plea as all before
him, claiming aberrantly against my interest that ne bis idem expires in time. This alone is ground
of annulment of judgment 4909/231/2017
This constitutes a flagrant breach of article 6 paragraph 3 letter b from the Convention -
right to reasonable time to prepare a defense - I was given no time at all
7.3. So-called judge Dinu Murgulet Ana from courthouse Judecatoria Focsani in
4909/231/2017 falsified the rejection judgment of my request for her removal from the dossier
based on her incompatibility because she falsified mandates for my detainment and she infringed
on my right to make my defense. She broke article 67 paragraph 5 from Romanian Penal code of
procedure claiming that the request factually based on her falsification of detainment mandate
from 05.04.2017 from 4791/231/2017 was already judged, but as fact I havent made such a
request between 06.04.2017 when I was illegally detained with it, and 04.10.2017 so such a
request couldnt have been possibly judged, thus so called judge Dinu Murgulet Ana broke the
principle nemo esse iudex in sua causa potest, judging her own request for removal for
incompatibility reasons, not to mention I accused her in the same penal file that makes her
incompatible according to article 11 form OUG 27/2002 - ~no functionary can address anything
regarding anything regarding himself. This alone is ground of annulment of judgment
4909/231/2017

Page 5 of 37
 This constitutes a flagrant breach of article 6 from the Convention - right to a fair (lawful)
trial - all relevant laws were broken on purpose, be it procedure or material right
7.4. other irregularities such as the fact I havent received any subpoena as required by
same article 184 paragraph 8 from Romanian Penal procedure code before so called judge Dinu
Murgulet Ana falsified the detainment mandate from 04.10.2017 from 4909/231/2017, for the
purpose of impeding me of learning about dossier 4909/231/2017 and consequently building my
defense. This also infringes on my guaranteed right to have the time to make my defense,
according to art. 6 (3) b) from the Convention, implicitly on my right to a fair (lawful) trial
according to art. 6 from the Convention

THE URGENCY -

1. the so called police and gendarmes will keep breaking illegally into my mother's home to
harass her as they threatened, and will keep arresting me illegally if Im there instigated by
2. so called magistrates in Vrancea county that will keep attempting to illegally commit me
psychiatrically and most probably harm me as they did before and as I prove below they tried
through 11224/231/2015 which I annulled as unfounded at courthouse Tribunalul Vrancea in
11224/231/2015, where the 1st instance falsified decision is identical to the one in 4909/231/2017
because its illegal and based on fictional accusations as I prove below it cant be otherwise,
3. so called magistrates in Vrancea county will keep attempting to falsify a psychiatric forensic
expertise with the help of the corrupt functionaries of local forensic service, which is legally
impossible without an expertise done with my consent through an interview which is the only way
according to art. 183 paragraph 3 of Romanian Penal practice code and articles 10 and 11 from
Romanian Law 487/2002 regarding mental health. Observing me incarcerated at psychiatry won't
prove anything because I never consumed narcotics and don't drink alcohol since my adolescence
and now I'm 36 and a half years old, nor I ever committed a penal offence, nor was I accused of
such rightfully
4. so called magistrates in Vrancea county will keep attempting to use a falsified psychiatric
forensic expertise which they falsified before with the help of corrupt forensic functionaries that I
caught red-handed (but couldn't convict because the corrupt magistrates are the Romanian
judicial system), for trying to obligate me to psychiatric medical treatment to inject me with
toxic substances as they attempted through 14277/231/2015 where they also lost the trial as in
11224/231/2015 this time both 1st at Judecatoria Focsani and 2nd at Tribunalul Vrancea
instance, as I prove below and as can the summaries can be found publicly in ECRIS, the Romanian
public dossier informatics evidence available on all Romanian courthouse sites
5. the decision against my contestation of 1st courts falsified judgment in 4909/231/2017 will be
falsified as I prove shortly invoking attached proof #1 about the fact so called judge Neagru
Rodica from courthouse "Tribunalul Vrancea" with no shred of proof that Im mentally
alienated or facts that could even raise such a suspicion, demanded that I prove I'm not
mentally alienated infringing on the presumption of innocence protected by article 6.2 of the

Page 6 of 37
European convention of human rights, implicitly by the Romanian Constitution through article
20, directly by the Romanian Constitution through article 23 paragraph 11 and by Romanian Penal
procedure code articles 4 and 99, all of which the so called judge Neagru Rodica broke because if
I'm presumed innocent then the fictional accusation and the facts don't actually exist as they
really don't in my case, thus they don't constitute a penal offence so I can't be accused of mental
alienation of debilitation arbitrarily that is without any possible demonstration based on facts,
thus I can't be presumed mentally alienated because that would directly contradict the
presumption of innocence and juridical logic, which is exactly what so called judge Neagru Rodica
did - see that she said "este necesar" in translation meaning "it's necessary" that I prove I'm not
mentally alienated, necessity which for obvious reasons of contradiction with presumption of
innocence doesnt exist in the law thus so called judge Neagru Rodica doesn't obey the law as
required by a judge according to article 1 paragraph 5 of Romanian Constitution regarding the
principle of legality, and article 124 of Romanian Constitution that states all judges obey solely the
law, so in conclusion so called judge Neagu Rodica lacks objectivity as I already knew because I
already filed several penal complaints against her for falsifying judgments in my trials
6. so called magistrates in Vrancea county will surely invent other abuses against me and my
family as these continuous illegal arrests, violation of private property, and psychiatric falsified
acts attest, as I will prove below

The imminent damages are certainty of illegal loss of freedom, risk to life or of torture,
inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment, ill-treatment or other serious harm, risk of
social exclusion, risk of a flagrant denial of justice, risk to private and family life, health and
conditions of detention, right to a fair trial and legal representation,
because this same criminal group of magistrates instigated an interloper to kill me, who
on 05.12.2014 hit me on the head and threw me over a flight of stair unconsciously proven by
witnesses, material proof of an audio-video recording and the interloper caught lying proven by
the existing evidence, after which the interloper was protected by same magistrate group who
covered all the penal and civil files up stealing proofs from the files and falsifying the acts of
procedure, and afterwards to discredit and silence me invented causes 15730/231/2014,
2417/P/2014, 10547/231/2015, 11224/231/2015, 14277/231/2015, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016,
4329/P/2016 - where the nnnn/231/yyyy files are publicly accessible on courthouses sites of
Judecatoria Focsani and Tribunalul Vrancea instances, googling for link like so site:.ro
judecatoria focsani without the quotes, then searching the file number with cautare dosare
option. The nnnn/P/yyyy are penal files at the prosecutors office in Vrancea county, first one at
Parchetul de pe langa Tribunalul Vrancea the rest at Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria
Focsani - and I mention they refused to give me my right to consult these files thus I cant attach
proofs from them. Ive sued them for this also but of course they control all the judges so I cant
possibly obtain any my rights in a Romanian courthouse

Page 7 of 37
 I am licensed in mathematics - informatics and worked as an IT programmer at least 4
years legally, and because of the magistrate mafia illicit activity and slander against me I cant find
a job because they keep falsifying trials, penal files and psychiatric papers I must defend against,
and about which I must also tell at the employers work medicine exam, even if they are falsified,
thus I have to mention this at the interview which of course impedes me getting a job.
I am now also a student in law in first year and currently in session, and this damages my
time meant for study and making essays as requested by the faculty, thus my future, as well my
time meant for acquisition of means of existence - basically they are destroying my life as they've
nothing better to do since 2012 when they last left me with no job, broke my possibility to acquire
a house through loan and consequently impeded me to found a family, and ever since they have
been trying to stop me obtaining justice. I evaluate and claim the moral and material damages at
the end of this urgent notification

A POSSIBLE URGENT SOLUTION -

As I read in the guide "In cases of systemic shortcomings, typically of a legislative kind, the
ECHR can mandate that a State pass, modify or repeal legislation. In exceptional cases, the Court
may set a deadline for that action", although its not my obligation to provide solutions but my
interest, I propose that
1. If ECHR will urgently mandate that Romania will repeal article 184 from Romanian Code
of penal procedure and similar articles like 240, 245-248, 521 (2) a), 566-573 regarding medical
unjustified measures against suspects and the accused that are first of all benefiting from the
presumption of innocence, and that are usually without legal and factual justification. The so
called Romanian magistrates are using the judicial system and psychiatry as an weapon of
wrongful repression against me and others which is an old communist method of wrongful
repression of undesirables, therefore these articles must be repealed because theyre
unconstitutional, that is in contradiction article 23 paragraph 11 from Romanian Constitution, and
in contradiction with the presumption of innocence according to article 6.2 from the European
convention of human rights because the articles regarding medical unjustified measures
against suspects and the accused can be used against anyone in Romania by making him a suspect
or accused of any hallucinated felonies by the judicial functionaries which as proof don't exist in
my case's penal files 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 or 2417/P/2014 which was
falsified before these in which Ive also havent been convicted because theres nothing to be
convicted of as the authors of the falsified penal files know
2. Theres need for a mandatory penal and disciplinary responsibility law for magistrates,
such as if they break the law harming a person on purpose they should be immediately suspended
from office and summarily trialed and convicted. Its impossible to break the law if youre
mentally sane and I dont even have formal law studies and I know the law by intuition having
conscience and some Christian education, and the details of the law just by reading it so I cant
break it because Im socially integrated and civilized. A magistrate has no excuse as he spends 4

Page 8 of 37
years in law faculty, he graduates through an exam, he is admitted in the profession through an
exam, he takes grades through exams and every trial is a veritable exam, so if for me the simple
citizen is impossible to break the law, for a magistrate its beyond any reasonable doubt
inadmissible and proof of bad will or criminal intent, especially if they get the quoted law from me
in the file and they still break the law
There have been many proposals by different parties for the law for responsibility of
magistrates, but of course they, the magistrate mafia, refuse officially such a law proposal reach
parliament, although they should have no word in it according to the principle of separation of
powers in the democratic state, proving again beyond any doubt the magistrate mafia in Romania
controls the legislative, the politics thus the government through political police as is what
notoriously Laura Croduta Kovesi chief prosecutor or direction of anticorruption DNA does all
the time instead of her job, and of course they control the judicial system, all of which explains
the disaster in Romania. Elimination of corrupt magistrates through a law about the responsibility
of the magistrates is the key that can turn civilization back on in Romania. Maybe that law will
also not be applied as the rest, but its a start and will certainly cut off the arrogance these so-
called magistrates grew without measure over the years, lately even claiming they are sovereigns

As proof that these proposals are valid I remind that according to the law as well as
common sense, the psychiatric procedure is to be applied against the penal offenders who
supposedly committed homicide of infanticide as stated in art. 184 paragraph 1 from Romanian
Penal procedure code which should be clarified because to the so called magistrates who don't
understand propositional logic nor respect the presumption of innocence, seems to them that
they can propose it at will against anyone without motivation and get away with it, therefore the
procedure at article 184 as well as articles 240, 245-248, 521 (2) a), 566-573 regarding medical
unjustified punitive measures against suspects and the accused and others articles like them
from the Romanian Penal procedure code should be repealed because they're targeted at
suspects and the accused which are innocent until proven guilty according to art. 4 and 99 from
Romanian Penal procedure code, article 23 paragraph 11 from Romanian Constitution and
obviously or notoriously the international treaties Romania has ratified, as article 6.2 from the
European convention of human rights
I am positive that ECHR can creatively use it's legal resorts to stop these flagrant abuses
against me and my family, and not only me as I mention case Grosu Ulise vs Romania, Mr. Grosu
Ulise being from same Vrancea county as me, who won in his ECHR case 60113/12 similar to mine
for also being wrongfully deprived of liberty and forcefully brought to the psychiatric ward to be
interned illegally accused of fictional terrorism, and I also mention to my knowledge pending
cause Ivascu vs Romania 41719/12 which is also similar meaning a criminal group of so called
magistrates used psychiatry as a weapon for years against him for filing a penal complaint as they
do now against me, and they failed to produce thus far any official evidence of Mr. Ivascus
insanity for believing he has rights in Romania - perhaps the magistrate mafia should be
encouraged to publicly declare the proletariat has no rights at all, as the magistrates at National

Page 9 of 37
anticorruption direction in Galati of which Vrancea depends judicially already declared they are
sovereigns in official ordnances instead of motivation of file classification, meaning they do as
they will speaking of which perhaps theyd like to clarify why a magistrate is not incompatible if
hes also a member of masonry, as I hear they decided in the Superior council of magistrates
CSM - and we would all like to be clarified on the matter of our rights so at least we know we
live in a dictatorship under the totalitarism of the magistrate mafia - the few who deprive the
many of their rights

As proof I cannot attach the falsified judgment in 4909/231/2017 because the magistrate
mafia is trying to impede me to obtain justice, but I can prove it exists using proof #1 and that is
illegal and unfounded as I shortly demonstrated above at pages 3-4, therefore I was denied the
right to a fair (lawful) trial according to article 6 from the Convention
I also point that 4909/231/2017 is public knowledge, indicating its summary can be read
in ECRIS on the courthouse's "Judecatoria Focsani" site where I picked it up also, which can be
easily googled up with the key words site:.ro judecatoria focsani without the quotes, then
searching the file number with cautare dosare option, and as proof judgment in
4909/231/2017 exists I indicate attached proof #1 which is an address of the so called judge
Neagu Rodica from the contestation 4909/231/2016 against the 1st instance falsified judgment,
Parts of the demonstration relevant to the Convention I explain punctually in section III
of present request for interim measures that prove beyond any reasonable doubt the judgment
in 4909/231/2017 is illegal,
and as proof #1 shows I already filed the contestation in file 4909/231/2017 at
courthouse "Tribunalul Vrancea" for many more reasons of broken procedure in all relevant legal
aspects, where I noticed the file was obtained by a known so called judge Neagu Rodica from
courthouse Tribunalul Vrancea against which I opened penal files before, who instead of
declaring the 1st instance judgment unfounded on 04.12.2017 and 04.14.2017 as in
11224/231/2015 for at least the 7 demonstrated reasons I found that judgment of 1st instance is
void for illegality - without any legal basis, so called judge Neagru Rodica from courthouse
"Tribunalul Vrancea" with no shred of proof that Im mentally alienated or facts / deeds that
could even raise such a suspicion, demanded that I prove I'm not mentally alienated infringing
on the presumption of innocence protected by article 6.2 of the European convention of human
rights because if I am to be presumed innocent, then the fictional accusation and the facts or
deeds don't actually exist as they really don't in my case, and whether they really don't doesn't
really matter because if they don't constitute a penal offence I can't be accused of mental
alienation or debilitation arbitrarily that is without any demonstration, thus I can't be presumed
mentally alienated because that would directly contradict the presumption of innocence
according to Romanian Constitution article 23 paragraph 11 and Penal procedure code articles 4
and 99, all of which the so called judge Neagu Rodica broke as I anticipated they would place the
contestation of 4909/231/2017 at a judge controlled by the criminal group who's perpetrating
these abuses

Page 10 of 37
 As proof I attach indexed #1 the address though which so-called judge Neagu Rodica
from "Tribunalul Vrancea" courthouse demands me to prove I'm not mentally alienated or
debilitated. This historically is the same case of "prove you're not the devil", principle central to
the witch hunts and summary judgments in medieval times
The proof that I'm not mentally alienated is categorical - I haven't committed a penal
offence or at least an immoral act or any act that constitutes a premise for my mental
alienation or debilitation, and Im not accused of homicide or infanticide nor do they have my
written consent to be psychiatrically examined according to article 184 from Romanian Penal
procedure code, thus these procedures dont apply to me.
On the other hand the symptoms of incoherent verbal production and occupational
dysfunction indicate the judge's schizophrenia according to DSM-V, and sociopathy as defined
being the behavior of breaking pervasively the law and other person's rights as these so called
judges do, as I've found out documenting myself using the psychiatric manual DSM-V to defend
myself against this criminal group using psychiatry as a weapon of wrongful repression
I can attach only the falsified mandate from 05.04.2017 from 4791/231/2017 as proof
#2, which states the clearly falsified reason that I be psychiatrically examined as I translate: ~I
must be psychiatrically examined because I refused to be psychiatrically examined, not because I
committed any crime, and afterwards the same judge eluded the randomly distribution system
for files obtaining 4909/231/2017 illegally for falsifying the judgment using the same aberrant
motivation that I must be psychiatric committed because I refused to be psychiatrically examined
The mandate from 04.10.2017 from 4909/231/2017 and the ones form 13th, 14th and 27th
of April 2017 they refused to communicate to me or my mother to impede me proving my penal
complaints against them which isn't really impeding me because I can prove they're illegal as Ive
already proven the whole procedure is around 4909/231/2017, infringing on article 184 from
Romanian Penal code of procedure which sais only the accused of homicide and infanticide can
be psychiatrically expertised and even so they can't without the accused's consent according to
article 184 paragraph 3 from Romanian Penal code of procedure and article 10 and 11 from
Romanian Law 287/2002, thus making my detainment to be expertised aberrant because they
don't have my written consent for an interview, nor do they have a penal case because the facts
are fictive as the fact that they refuse to send the penal file in the courthouse to condemn me
since 18.05.2016 when they invented the penal file, constitutes short proof of my innocence
because if the facts where real I wouldve been convicted in 30-60 days according to Romanian
Law 304/2004. I corroborate with articles 10, 11, 17 from Romanian Law 487/2002 regarding
norms about mental sanity management that state the same thing about the expertise only being
possible through an interview for which obviously the examinee's consent is needed. The falsified
mandates also infringes on rights stated by articles 22 (1-2), 23 (1-2), art. 26 (2), 27 and 29 from
Romanian Constitution and also article 20 from Romanian Constitution and article 9 and 12
from the Universal declaration of human rights which prohibits arbitrary or unjust/unlawful
detainment. According to articles 9, 266 and 280 from Romanian Penal procedure code I
shouldn't have been subjected to the detainments as the police / gendarmes have the right and
obligation to remark the mandate is void of right because it's illegal, but of course they're
accomplices and they executed it anyway even after I explained to them it's illegal. According to

Page 11 of 37
articles 4 and 99 from Romanian Penal procedure code Im innocent until proven guilty, and also
according to article 6.2 from the Convention
As these mandates havent been communicate to me, they can be obtained by ECHR
making an address to the Romanian government namely ministry of justice and public ministry
responsible for the administration of courthouses, and for the activity of prosecutor offices
respectively, and also to the ministry of internal affairs responsible for the policemen and
gendarmes.

The exact institutions that must have the proof of the existence of the falsified mandate
from 04.10.2017 from 4909/231/2017 is the courthouse "Judecatoria Focsani" and the gendarmes
inspectorate "Inspectoratul de jandarmi a judetului Vrancea", at addresses:
1. Judecatoria Focsani, Str.Cuza Vod nr.43, Focani, judeul Vrancea, Romania, email:
jud-focsani@just.ro
2. Inspectoratul de jandarmi a judetului Vrancea, str. Republicii nr. 14, Focsani, judetul
Vrancea, Romania, email: relatiipublice@jandarmeriavrancea.ro

The exact institutions that must have the proof of the existence of the falsified mandates
from 13 , 14th and 27th of April 2017 about execution of falsified decision in 4909/231/2017, is the
th

prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" which has penal files
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 from which 4909/231/2017 originates, or
policemen's inspectorate "Inspectoratul de politiei judetean Vrancea",
to which I cant write to because they refuse to respond to me truthfully or at all as they
did before:
1. Parchetul de pe lng Judecatoria Focsani, Str. Cuza Vod nr. 43, Focani, jud. Vrancea,
Romania, email: pj_focsani@just.ro
2. Inspectoratul de Politie a Judetului Vrancea, str. Cezar Bolliac nr. 12, Focani, jud.
Vrancea, 620167, Romania, email: cabinet@vn.politiaromana.ro

II. Base case, or a more detailed resume of the origin of this illicit situation.

I have been accused with fictive penal offences in file 2417/P/2014 - offending a
magistrate or Ultrajul judiciar, which is based on fictive facts unsupported by any real proof, and
by fictive legal accusations because I wasn't accused of any particular penal offence which
constitutes the factual offence of a magistrate, as the penal offence Ultrajul judiciar acts as an
aggravation of a real felony such as threatening or hitting a magistrate, otherwise not an actual or
stand-alone penal offence.
The real reason for the existence of the falsified penal cause 2417/P/2014 is that I've filed
a penal complaint against the same magistrate who filed the falsified complaint in 2417/P/2014,
so called judge Dita Mirela from courthouse Tribunalul Vrancea, and against which I filed
another penal complaint for making false complaints against me. As short proof, filing false penal

Page 12 of 37
complaints constitutes multiple penal offences of which I was never accused of because all my
judicial declarations and proofs are truthful, thus by principle of non-contradiction and principle of
the excluded third the declarations made against me are false because I am in direct contradiction
with the ones I accused of lying, which are the ones that accused me claiming falsely they tell the
truth. I mention the same so called magistrate Dita Mirela slandered me by introducing file
15730/231/2014 for putting me under interdiction for psychiatric reasons which she couldn't
because her claims and plea were ridiculous such as ~citizens who exert their rights are mentally
alienated, and then she gave up the action but not before slandering me before my ex employer
who I was in another courthouse at trial with, and saw an opportunity in this to send his lawyers
and make an accessory request to support the so-called judge's claims with nothing, for which he
also lost the case but the file remains public and its nature is clearly able to slander me against
any employer which I have no doubt the so-called judge intended
As proof of my innocence and mental sanity I was never convicted until now, nor judged
in 2417/P/2014 or 15730/231/2014, because the organized crime group that falsified these
knows I'm innocent and sane, as well as the difficulty of condemning an innocent or
psychiatrically committing a sane man, which is why they break every possible law
The actual proof: the penal sentence for my condemnation must appear in ECRIS, the
informatics public evidence system of all the Romanian civil and penal files, ant it doesn't exist

This 2417/P/2014 penal file is linked with unlawful and unjustified deprivation of my
liberty on 09.17.2015 (to be detained and brought forcefully to the psychiatric commission
unjustified) and 11.12.2015 (to be detained and brought in 14277/231/2015 before I received any
subpoena, regarding the proposal to be obligated to undergo psychiatric treatment without being
diagnosed or even having committed any illegal or at least immoral act to be accused of.)
I mention at this point that this is common criminal practice in so called European
province Vrancea, by the "magistrate" local criminal group aided by local police, gendarmes and
forensic medicine functionaries, and as proof I invoke ECRH file 60113/12 regarding Grosu Ulise
(from Vrancea county) vs Romania which he won for being forcefully arrested in public space by
so-called policemen and accused of terrorist acts for which they tried to commit him directly at
the local psychiatric ward illegally and unjustified. My case is initially identical to his except they
broke into my home illegally at 6:00 a.m. the first time detaining me with 4 masked police and 2
other policemen for 7 hours to harass me, and it got much worse proving nothing was done since
Grosu Ulise won in 60113/12, and as he predicted the fact ECRH didn't harshly condemn Romania
for it encouraged the criminals in the so called European province Vrancea. I also predict it will get
much worse as I observed it did over the years based on some ever increasing psychopathic /
sociopathic criminal and maniacal hunger for immoral power / liberty which can only grow worse
if it's not abruptly and publicly terminated with total application of the law's extent
I'm also pointing to cause Ivascu vs Romania 41719/12 which hasn't been judged as far as
I know, however points that the legislative problem allows and encourages grave abuses in some
provinces by groups of criminal "magistrates" who commit acts of wrongful repression against
their victims or take revenge, and the heads in justice simply refuse to do anything about it -
prosecutors refuse to prosecute magistrates and falsify classification ordnances and CSM

Page 13 of 37
(Romanian Superior magistrate council) refuses to disciplinarily expel these so-called magistrates,
and I know because I made tens of unique penal and disciplinary complaints which these so-called
institutions either lied that theyre not signed or that the facts aren't described at all, or just
claimed the facts don't exist disregarding all proof and making no attempt to prove anything -
which would be useless indeed to try to prove proven facts don't exist.

After 2417/P/2014 I have also been accused of disturbing the courthouses meeting's
quietness on 05.18.2016 waiting for my complaints about the prosecutors falsified acts
2220/91/2015 and 1560/231/2016 from 2417/P/2014 to be called while listening audio books on
earphones which I've done before and after without being accused proving it's a ridiculous
accusation if just the accusation itself is not proof enough, and for other fictional offences that I
got the audio recordings of the courthouse to prove they don't exist, such as saying curse words,
or simply pleading in my defense or legitimate interest. Obviously the same criminal group
doesnt intend to let me prove in court that file 2417/P/2014 was falsified which is why they
accused me wrongfully to harass and blackmail me, and now if they did not succeed they are
trying to discredit me and most probably harm me or kill me to silence me, using psychiatry
because no death in psychiatric detainment is investigated in Romania.
These ridiculous and fictional accusations make up the new penal files 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 which were falsified for the purpose of determining my judicial
declarations about 2417/P/2014 by blackmail or worse. 2417/P/2014 itself was invented to
discredit and blackmail me to not seek justice about the attempt on my life on 12.05.2014 by an
interloper named Herghelegiu Danut from Galati instigated by the same criminal "magistrate"
group for making penal complaints for the rights and money they stole from me before, and I
have solid proof by winning in 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 that these
so-called magistrates are using the judicial system and psychiatry to make attempts at my life or
physical and psychological wellbeing for the purpose of silencing me, as these repeated attempts
involving using psychiatry as a weapon of terrorism prove directly through their obsession to
subject me to psychiatric treatment which is basically chemical lobotomisation without any legal
and factual basis, which again as proof started at the same time the criminal "magistrate" group
instigated the interloper to kill me on 12.05.2014, which failed and afterwards the same
"magistrate" group that is the same prosecutors and judges from 2417/P/2014 and
15730/231/2014 tried to cover the interloper's felonies blatantly incriminating themselves
instead. Obviously all these terrorist / criminal acts have as illicit motivation the interest of this
"magistrate" group to silence me which they won't unless they kill or gravely injure me although
they already managed to leave me without a home, job and consequently family as file
44139/3/2012 proves which is a civil file about work rights and ambulation of 2nd disciplinary
illegal lay off which as proof I'm innocent I mention I annulled the 1st in file 43961/3/2009, and
44139/3/2012 was delayed until today with the help of the same criminal magistrate group
from courthouse Tribunalul Vrancea and has at least 5 other numbers it circulates the judicial
system after I managed to move it back to courthouse Tribunalul Bucuresti, which will most
probably constitute another CEDO request from me that Romania be condemned for breaking

Page 14 of 37
article 6.1. from the Convention. This illicit situation is also the source of the conflict and grave
abuses against me
As proof I was never convicted until now, nor sent to be judged in 2845/P/2016 existing
since 18.05.2016 or penal files 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 existing since 24.06.2016,
because the organized crime group that falsified this knows I'm innocent as in 2417/P/2014.
Actual proof: the penal sentence of my condemnation must appear in ECRIS ant it doesn't
exist

These 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 penal files are linked with unlawful
and unjustified deprivation of liberty on 04.06.2017 (to be detained and brought forcefully to the
psychiatric commission unjustified again as on 09.17.2015) and 04.10.2017 (to be detained and
brought in 4909/231/2017 before I received a subpoena, regarding the proposal to be obligated
to be involuntarily psychiatrically committed unjustified legally or factually), then the falsified
judgment in 4909/231/2017 was used to break into my mothers home on 13th, 14th and 27th of
April 2017, the so-called police and gendarmes also threatening my mother theyll break into her
home every day until theyll arrest me gain (illegally), to commit me psychiatrically unjustified,
which caused my mother to fall ill with Zoster Area from stress and trauma

III. STATEMENT OF ALLEGED VIOLATION(S) OF THE CONVENTION AND/OR

PROTOCOLS AND OF RELEVANT ARGUMENTS

These criminal acts are against the following Convention articles (3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14)
as I punctually demonstrate:

III^1. Art. 3 from the Convention "No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment". I've been subjected to unlawful attacks by use of the
judicial system and psychiatry as a means of wrongful repression, for which purpose I've been
detained illegally repeatedly as I prove punctually below, demonstration which I will invoke in all
the subsequent punctual demonstrations of infringement of fore mentioned CEDO articles:

1. I've been wrongfully detained with a falsified mandate from 10.09.2015 from
10547/231/2015 by so called judge Dinu Murgulet Ana from courthouse "Judecatoria Focsani",
executed on 09.17.2015 though which i was detained 7 hours time in which time the so called
prosecutor Mihaila Paul from prosecutors office "Parchetul de pe langa Tribunalul Vrancea"
falsified another mandate that I be brought with the masked police as a dangerous felon to the
local psychiatric forensic commission Comisia de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din cadrul
Serviciului de medicina legala Vrancea. I attach as proof #3 the falsified mandate from
09.10.2015 from 10547/231/2015, and I shortly prove that it's falsified by indicating it's illegal
according to article 184 from Romanian Penal procedure code especially paragraphs 1 that state

Page 15 of 37
only the accused of homicide and infanticide can be sent to be psychiatrically examined, and
even so paragraph 3 states that the expertise can only be performed if the examinee gives his
consent because the examination is done through an interview as I corroborate with articles 10
and 11 from Romanian law 487/2002 known as the mental sanity law, interview that can't be
done obviously unless the examinee gives his consent, and also rules out criteria from the
interview as the examinee's religion, conscience, political views and other because in the penal
matter the facts from the penal file are the domain of the psychiatric examination only. My illegal
detainment on 09.17.2015 also breaks art. 22 (1-2), 23 (1-2), art. 26 (2), 27 and 29 from
Romanian Constitution and also art. 20 from Romanian Constitution and article 9 and 12 from
the Declaration of human rights which prohibits arbitrary or unjust/unlawful detainment
Because I haven't given my consent my detainment and bringing with the circus of
masked police and other police to the psychiatric commission was illegal, even more so for
subjecting me to degrading treatment before that I may cede under pressure and appear crazy
which they didn't succeed but made me suffer for which I demand satisfaction and reparation
including their exclusion from public function and interdiction to occupy a public function so they
may never abuse anyone again

Because I wasn't condemned in 2417/P/2014 from which mandate 10547/231/2015

originates, it's obvious there was no facts that I should be psychiatrically examined against, as well
as it's clear that there was no urgency as it's required in psychiatric profiled proceedings, because
file 2417/P/2014 was invented in secret at the same time as the interloper's attack on my life on
12.05.2014, time at which the same so called magistrate Dita Mirela from courthouse "Tribunalul
Vrancea" that invented 2417/P/2014 filed 15730/231/2014 regarding my putting under
psychiatric interdiction which she lost but slandered me in public with it, then 10 months later
comes this "urgency" to commit me psychiatrically which was actually a penal complaint I filed
against this so-called magistrate Dita Mirela after finding out about 2417/P/2014 and about
15730/231/2014, and the "urgency" was their need to cover their abuses up and discredit and
silence me using psychiatry because no death in psychiatric detainment is investigated in Romania
- and final proof of my innocence is that I am not convicted in this penal file 2417/P/2014 until
today as it can be reopened any time if it was real, and as other proof it's almost impossible to
penally offend a judge without the judge having proof because that only happens in court where
they are observed by audio-video security and gendarmes, and there can be other witnesses in
public courthouse proceedings, and there is always at least one other functionary with the judge
that can act as a witness, none of which existed in 2417/P/2014 as proof. In fact I have never seen
face to face this so called judge Dita Mirela, only an old picture on the internet, and she cant
claim otherwise. The accusations were made using false proofs from civil files against that judge
in which the judge is obviously no judge because of the principle nemo esse iudex in sua causa
potest - nobody can be a judge in his own cause - in which I called this so called judge to answer
for his crimes and repair the damages done to me, which means of course the so called judge
used the judicial system, psychiatry and various illicit connections with other judicial functionaries
, as weapons of wrongful repression and revenge against me, especially using psychiatry because
deaths in psychiatric detainment in Romania arent investigates as the press pointed out

Page 16 of 37
especially recently after a secret service report to the general prosecutors office, that the
psychiatrists are using patients for illegal experiments for the pharmaceutical mafia

2. so called prosecutor Mihaila Paul from this criminal group then tried to blackmail my
mother making several phone threats claiming they were subpoenas which they were far from
legally as my mother has nothing to do with this, and claiming over the phone that if my mother
doesn't convince me to commit myself voluntarily at the psychiatric ward, they will go to the
judge and obtain an involuntary psychiatric commitment, which he did in 11224/231/2015 which I
annulled as unfounded contesting the judgment thus also proving the prosecutors proposal was
falsified.
I can provide on demand proof of the harassment of my mother with pictures from my
mother's phone, perhaps other proof from the mobile phone service provider or even the
prosecutor's files, but most of these are stuck at my mothers home where I left them not
imagining this criminal group would attempt this again after they lost in court, which now I realize
these criminals are capable of anything - I suppose this has something to do with the fact
"politics" changed in Romania with the coming to power again of the so called Democratic social
party (PSD), which is the "party" that made the Romanian coup dtat in 1989 and assassinated
Ceausescu by falsifying the "special" court papers - no proofs for the accusations, no appeal, and
is notoriously a criminal group not a party, that has a lot of strength in my home so called
European Vrancea county where all this happened, county that depends on Galati
administratively and judicially for which reason I mention that the actual PSD minister of justice
Toader Tudorel is from Vrancea, and Stanciu Livia, the ex president of supreme court found
repeatedly condemning innocents by ECHR that is now so called judge at Romanian Constitutional
Court is from Galati, and head of Supreme magistrate council Ghena Mariana is also from Galati,
meaning this region's mafia took over the judicial system in the last 6 months or so - and I also
mention Ive brought all of this to their attention repeatedly and they refused to initiate
disciplinary action against the criminal magistrates as their job obligates them according to article
44 from Romanian Law 317/2004 at least regarding the entitled to start disciplinary action against
magistrates

3. Indeed, so called prosecutor Mihaila Paul and his superior Tarlea Florin Cristinel
afterwards used an ex corrupt cop from Vaslui county made judge named Craciun Constantin
Catalin to falsify 11224/231/2015 at courthouse "Judecatoria Focsani" to commit me
psychiatrically involuntarily, which I contested and annulled as unfounded in the file
11224/231/2015 at courthouse "Tribunalul Vrancea", as proof that 11224/231/2015 at first
courthouse "Judecatoria Focsani" was falsified as well as the prosecutors proposal, for breaking
article 184 from Romanian Penal procedure code, art. 10-11, 17 from Law 487/2002, art. 22 (1-
2), 23 (1-2), art. 26 (2), 27 and 29 from Romanian Constitution and also art. 20 from Romanian

Page 17 of 37
Constitution and article 9 and 12 from the Declaration of human rights which prohibits arbitrary
or unjust/unlawful detainment
This is public knowledge accessible through ECRIS file evidence system at these
courthouses internet sites. Regardless I attach the minutes of sentences of first instance in
11224/231/2015 and then the sentence in 11224/231/2015 in contestation at second instance
as proof #4 and proof #5

This not only slandered me in public and made a grave affront to my dignity but caused
me great concern and fear for my safety and life because of the total disregard of the law by these
so called magistrates, uncertainty caused by this illegal chaos and continuous harassment from
09.17.2015 until ~28.10.2015 when I remember I won and annulled the involuntary psychiatric
commitment in 11224/231/2015, situation in which resulted in grief, anxiety, frustration, sleep
disorders and digestive disorders, also associated with the fact on 09.17.2015 I was arrested by
masked police who broke into my home at 6:00 a.m. as an terrorist act, proven by the fact so
called prosecutor Mihaila Paul appeared at 9:00 a.m. as I remember and did no acts of procedure
as required but harassed me instead for 6 hours before sending me illegally with masked police to
the psychiatric commission. I mention they wasted my life in the period 09.17.2015 until
~28.10.2015 obligating me to document myself and build my own defense because I couldn't find
a single lawyer versed or willing to help me in Vrancea county, and had no financial resources to
hire another from the capital. They in fact corrupted the state lawyer who pleaded with the same
rhetoric of the prosecutor Mihaila Paul, for which I filed a penal complaint also

4. After losing in 11224/231/2015 so called prosecutor Mihaila Paul and his superior
Tarlea Florin Cristinel instigated in the period 30.10.2015-03.12.2015 the members of the so
called psychiatric commission to falsify a forensic expertise calling me ~"most probably paranoid"
and motivating that ~"I do not discern what I'm doing because i have superior studies, fast
thinking and general culture" - I'm not joking and certainly not lying as I will present proof below,
and they lied that I have penal history which I easily proven untrue requesting this penal history
from the police where they responded of course that it doesn't exist.
I determined the period after I found so called prosecutor Mihaila Paul and his superior
Tarlea Florin Cristinel address towards the local forensic service "Serviciul de medicina legala
Vrancea" dating from 30.10.2015, and the falsified forensic expertise dating 03.12.2015 which
couldn't mean it was falsified on the same date as it was communicated. The point is that I was
brought to the same commission on 09.17.2015 and they lied I was expertised then which is
untrue because I refused and they detained me for the 7th hour for nothing, perhaps to justify
that the time spent was an actual expertise and interview. They should've made the forensic
report as late as 30 days after, and they are obligated by law to communicate it to me - I found it
in a penal file at the courthouse "Judecatoria Focsani" archive, but they didn't communicate it
even after several requests I made for the original or copy of the original and whatever other
papers they used my personal data in. All this proves they falsified the psychiatric papers at the

Page 18 of 37
obvious instigation of the so called prosecutors, and they still attempted to cover it up. About this
I filed a complaint to the local sanitation direction "Directia de sanatate Vrancea" which contains
the malpraxis committee, which falsified an answer refusing to name randomly an expert from
the national register to determine the malpraxis which I proven as I short-quoted with
approximation above as an example. I needed this malpraxis report from an expert to present in
court to nullify the falsified forensic report, and I did notify the courthouse "Judecatoria Focsani"
and also the courthouse "Tribunalul Vrancea" complaining about the malpraxis committee's
falsified response and so far they falsified the sentences refusing to judge. I've also notified the
local medic's college which contains the disciplinary committee which refused to respond at all
As proof I published under private electronic signature the penal complaint containing the
falsified expertise indexed in that complaint as proof #5 along with the written demonstration
that the psychiatric report is falsified,
as a pdf file protected against modification with all the scanned paper proofs in it, at the
address: https://www.scribd.com/doc/308837878/Plangere-Penala-Prealabila-7-Tarlea-Florin-
Cristinel-Mihaila-Paul-Dita-Mirela-Lucasievici-Silviu-Bezverhnii-Igor-Florea-Gabriela-Mihai-Oana-
Geo

I mention at this point the magistrate mafia at the same time with the illegal arrests from
04.06.2017 and 04.10.2017 also censored the entire forum I made at militia.freeforums.net on
08.04.2017 with no explanation given from the owners, part of which can still be probably found
in google.com cache, and they also attempted to censor my facebook.com counterpart posts on
10.04.2017 which only resulted in one post being deleted and a warning again with no particular
explanation given - they don't delete the videos of supposed attack of Assad on his citizens but
they delete random Romanian written article about a random Romanian corrupt judge, which
obviously can't mean anything else but discrimination and that my posts arent' against anything
in facebook.com rules of conduct.
They didn't manage to censor the scribd.com published counterparts, as I was using
militia.freeforums.net mainly for google's crawling bot to catch the practical models I've made
that should appear more often then on other people's searches that they be used as models for
their complaints of similar nature, so may we all be protected against this terrorism thorough
psychiatry by the magistrate mafia when needed - and the main journal of the abuses that I've
notified with the entire 123 europarlamentaries staff of LIBE - Commission for justice, civil
liberties and internal affairs, should be in my last facebook.com post for everyone to see and
learn of my fate and consequently the criminal activity of the so called Romanian magistrates

5. With the falsified forensic report so called prosecutor Mihaila Paul and his superior
Tarlea Florin Cristinel proposed that I be subjected to obligatory psychiatric treatment in file
14277/231/2015, when the so called judge Badiu Mandica from courthouse "Judectoria Focsani"
started the file by falsifying on 11.12.2015 a mandate that I should be detained illegally and
brought at the courthouse without receiving a subpoena first to not allow me to build a defense

Page 19 of 37
and make me cede under pressure harassing me with the gendarmes. As article 246 from
Romanian Penal procedure code, paragraph 3 states, I should've received a subpoena:
"Judecatorul sesizat conform alin. (1) fixeaza termen de solutionare a propunerii in cel mult 5 zile
de la data inregistrarii acesteia si dispune citarea suspectului sau inculpatului." . For this purpose
of harassing me judge Badiu Mandica ordered the gendarmes to detain me from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m.
in courthouse "Judecatoria Focsani" without a justification
This not only slandered me in public and made a grave affront to my dignity but caused
me great concern and fear for my safety and life because of the total disregard of the law by these
so called magistrates, uncertainty caused by this illegal chaos and continuous harassment from
12.11.2015 until ~02.02.2016 when I remember I won and annulled the obligatory psychiatric
treatment proposal in 14277/231/2015 at 1st instance, situation in which resulted in grief, anxiety,
frustration, sleep disorders and digestive disorders, also associated with the morning illegal
arrests on 09.17.2015 when I was arrested by masked police who broke into my home at 6:00
a.m. as an terrorist act, and the morning illegal arrest on 12.11.2015. I mention they wasted my
life in the period 12.11.2015 until ~02.02.2016 obligating me to document myself and build my
own defense because I couldn't find a single lawyer versed or willing to help me in Vrancea
county, and had no financial resources to hire another from the capital. They in fact corrupted the
state lawyer who pleaded that "I leave the defense to the judge", for which I filed a penal
complaint also. I also mention the most relevant fact, that the so-called prosecutors closed penal
file 2417/P/2014 on 10.12.2015, one day after introducing 14277/231/2015, for which reason I
had no passive quality in 14277/231/2015 to be judged with that the judge Badiu Mandica
should've acted upon and annulled the action immediately, but instead harassed me two
continuous months by aberrant judicial activity such as rejecting illegally my requests invoking
even an abrogated law to reject my notification of the Romanian Constitutional Court, as can be
seen in ECRIS in the summary of dossier 14277/231/2015

6. Then a different prosecutor named Dogaru Luminita Georgeta from a different

prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" filed a contestation in
14277/231/2015 which she lost on 07.07.2016, time in which 3-4 judges changed this file
between them with no apparent legal forms. On 07.07.2016 so called judge Popa Mariana from
courthouse "Tribunalul Vrancea" also rejected my legal contestation in which I demanded
amongst others the courthouse recognizes that the forensic report in it is illegal, that it may be
annulled. So called judge Popa Mariana from courthouse "Tribunalul Vrancea" is the judge who
falsified causes 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 on 24.06.2016 through which I was arrested
illegally recently, lying that I committed a penal offence proving as the basis of the request that
judge Popa Mariana must be removed for incompatibility from the file 14277/231/2015, that
same so-called judge Popa Mariana illegally sent my complaints meant for the courthouse
according to article 340 from romanian Penal procedure code, to the prosecutor's office to
impede them being judged, and falsified other sentences directly linked to 14277/231/2015 which
made her directly incompatible for addressing the same cause as stated by article 64 from

Page 20 of 37
Romanian Penal procedure code. Judge Popa Mariana made no real accusations but accused me
with the law's text generically, and later falsified 4 (four) more addresses in which she rejected my
requests for the communication of the material proof of the audio file from 24.06.2016 from
14277/231/2015 that proves I'm innocent but most of all proves a colossal number of felonies
done by so-called judge Popa Mariana who harassed me verbally on 24.06.2017 - and I mention
that in the 3rd penal file 2845/P/2016 in this matter that was falsified on 05.18.2016 by the same
so called prosecutor Dogaru Luminita Georgeta and so called judge Paun Ionel Iulian, another ex
corrupt cop made judge, I requested and obtained the audio file from 05.18.2016 from
2220/91/2015 (also from 2417/P/2014 as 14277/231/2015) through which I prove that my
request was admissible and so called judge Popa Mariana blocks me from obtaining the proof
which is proof in itself, that she silently recognizes her felonies.
The magistrate mafia censored my forum where I linked the audio file, but I will provide
the link from youtube where I publicized it: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-DVmkyBDlog,
and the link to the scribd pdf penal complaint with all the paper proof attached, and
secured against modification with my electronic signature:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316190675/dosar-penal-Paun-Ionel-Iulian-ascultatul-la-casti-e-
infractiune

7. I mentioned cause 2845/P/2016 was falsified by so called prosecutor Dogaru Luminita

Georgeta and so called judge Paun Ionel Iulian which obtained illegally by eluding the randomly
distribution system of files set in place in accordance with the Law 304/2004 for organizing the
Romanian judicial system, both dossiers 2220/91/2015 and 1560/231/2016 originating from penal
file 2417/P/2014, making him either way incompatible according to article 64 from Romanian
Penal procedure code because of it and also because he obtained and falsified a decision in
13761/231/2015 which is also a complaint against the prosecutors illegal acts in 2417/P/2014 as
2220/91/2015 and 1560/231/2016, all complaints according to article 340 from romanian Penal
procedure code, all which as I remember were turned before from the courthouse to the
prosecutor's office illegally by judge Popa Mariana so they wouldn't be judged and now that I
repeatedly introduced them back in court and they were admitted proves so called judge Popa
Mariana's acts were illegal as according to article 340 from Romanian Penal procedure code which
entitles the judge not the prosecutor to judge, obviously
On 05.18.2016 from 9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. I was listening to audio books on earphones
without so called prosecutor Dogaru Luminita Georgeta and so called judge Paun Ionel Iulian
accusing me of anything. At 10:30 a.m. suddenly and immediately after some young people who
were writing something down left the courthouse's meeting, so called judge Paun Ionel Iulian
called gendarmes and accused me of disturbing the quietness of the meeting by listening on
earphones, and accused me of cursing him verbally and through gestures. The courthouse
"Judecatoria Focsani" audio file from room 2 that I obtained on request proves there were no
cursed words spoken, as so called judge Paun Ionel Iulian himself declared he never heard them
or saw the gesture although I was in his plain sight all the time, and even the witnesses he named

Page 21 of 37
didn't corroborate and as short proof I wasn't condemned since 05.18.2016 until today, but
instead this criminal group of so called magistrates used the file to harass me falsifying blatantly
ordnance after ordnance, and recently started to arrest me almost every day and is trying to
commit me psychiatrically, deprive me of liberty, most probably harm me and start all over like
they did in 2417/P/2014 proposing no doubt another illegal and unjustified obligatory psychiatric
medical treatment to chemically lobotomize me, about which I mention no death in psychiatric
detainment in Romania is ever investigated, as pointed out by the press following a secret service
report to the general prosecutors office that the psychiatrists are making illegal experiments on
the patients for the pharmaceutical mafia
The files 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 were put together as last I heard
of them in 2016, after they falsified ordnances for beginning of penal pursuit (investigation in rem
about the existence of the penal offence), continuation of penal pursuit (investigation in
personam giving me the quality of suspect although they claim the penal offence is proven and
that I did it which means is flagrant) and penal pursuit put into action (giving me the quality of
accused which they should've done in the first place if there was an actual penal offence, which
still means I'm innocent according to article 6.2 from the Convention "Everyone charged with a
criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law", but before that
I'm innocent because there is no case against me, only fictive and ridiculous accusations)
This not only slandered me in public as I've been called to the police every time to give
the same exact declaration 3 times in total, and made a grave affront to my dignity but caused
me great concern and fear for my safety and life because of the total disregard of the law by these
so called magistrates and policemen, uncertainty caused by this illegal chaos and continuous
harassment from 18.05.2016 until today, situation in which resulted in grief, anxiety, frustration,
sleep disorders and digestive disorders, also associated with
1. the morning illegal arrests on 09.17.2015 when I was detained by 4 masked police and
2 policemen who broke into my home at 6:00 a.m. as an terrorist act - see proof #3 attached, and
2. the morning illegal detainment on 11.12.2015 by two gendarmes. Please obtain this
proof from 14277/231/2015 because Im unable to retrieve it from my mothers home because of
the criminal police who remade the communist Securitatea in so called European province
Vrancea
3. the morning illegal detainment on 04.06.2017 using falsified mandate from 04.05.2017
from 4791/231/2017, attached as proof #2, executed by 2 policemen and 2 masked policemen.
4. the morning illegal arrest on 04.10.2017 using falsified mandate from 04.10.2017 from
4791/231/2017, executed by 7 gendarmes and 2 prosecutors, one gendarme was filming and a
few others were harassing my physically to provoke me, and they even stole two pencils which
refused to return proving their lack of character, for the purpose of impeding me to write my
defense, and refused to leave the falsified mandate as proof and refused to tell who they were as
required by the law
5. the morning illegal attempted arrest on 13th, 14th and 27th of April 2017, threatening my
mother that they will keep breaking into her home although I've told them I don't live there, nor
my papers say that I live there, meaning they are doing it to harass my family if they can't harass
me. They refused to leave the falsified mandates as proof

Page 22 of 37
 Note: instigator of illegal arrests on 04.06.2017, 04.10.2017, 13th and 14th of April 2017
are the so called prosecutors Petrescu Auras Ionut, hierarchical superior of so called prosecutor
Lupu Mihai Cristian from prosecutors office Parchetul de pe langa judecatoria Focsani who
falsified penal files 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016, 4329/P/2016 and of course refuses to close
them or give to another prosecutor after I filed a penal complaint against them, because closing
the files would only constitute another proof against him

I mention they wasted my life in the period 05.18.2016 until today obligating me to
document myself and build my own defense because I couldn't find a single lawyer versed or
willing to help me in Vrancea county, and had no financial resources to hire another from the
capital. They in fact hired a corrupt lawyer to propose to me that I should be psychiatrically
expertised again in 2845/P/2016 as in 2417/P/2014 without justification, as the law requires a
lawyer be present at such a proposal, and this lawyer refused to plea anything in my favor
regarding the blatant illegality of the proposal being unmotivated thus arbitrary, and also
attempted to misinform me about the state of the penal file which I wasn't allowed to see, for
which I filed a penal complaint also. All the penal complaints about the lawyers, this being the last
so far, were never solved at prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Curtea de apel Galati" until
now as I can remember which I find interesting - unlike the judge's penal files which were delayed
then classified with falsified ordnances, against which I filed complaints and also introduced the
new so called prosecutor as accomplice and reintroduced the new penal complaint to the
attention of the general prosecutor of Romania at "Parchetul de pe langa Inalta Curte de Casatie
si Justitie" which also did nothing until recently when the whole process started again meaning as
usual they emitted a falsified ordnance determining me to reintroduce the penal complaint along
with the new so called prosecutor in it, and file a complaint to the courthouse - perhaps they
finally realized they can't legally close the penal pursuit against me and are trying again to silence
me which I find a lot more dangerous now when they're using the same method the second time,
when they're assured no penal or disciplinary consequence will befall them as none was taken
against them for the penal offences perpetrated against me through the falsified penal file
2417/P/2014 and the dossiers originating from it 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015, the
illegal arrests on 09.17.2015 and 12.11.2015 and also the 15730/231/2014 dossier of same
psychiatric profile with same actors.

III^2. Art. 5 from the Convention Everyone has the right to liberty and security of
person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty... - (a-b) are not applicable because I was
deprived of liberty illegally through breaking art. 184 from Romanian Penal procedure code, art.
10-11,17 from Romanian Law 487/2002, articles 22 (1-2), 23 (1-2), art. 26 (2), 27 and 29 from
Romanian Constitution and also article 20 from Romanian Constitution and article 9 and 12
from the Universal declaration of human rights which prohibits arbitrary or unjust/unlawful
detainment. In fact, I was illegally deprived of liberty through four falsified mandates of
detainment, followed by the falsification of a court decision for my illegal involuntary psychiatric

Page 23 of 37
commitment which constitutes the penal offence of attempting to deprive me of liberty illegally,
also punishable as the following attempts to deprive me of liberty using falsified papers on 13th,
14th and 27th of April 2017 are, not to mention using falsified papers is also a penal offense

III^3. Art. 6 from Convention everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a
reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal

1. In fact, my right to plead verbally was infringed upon by so called judge Dinu Murgulet
Ana who verbally said ~Im restricting your right to defend yourself - again this is no joke, you
can demand the audio recording from room 2 of courthouse Judecatoria Focsani from
04.10.2017 from file 4909/231/2017 as proof. Through this my right to my own defense was
restricted or as article 6 point 1 from the Convention states "everyone is entitled to a fair ...
hearing", fair meaning lawful
Obviously so called judge Dinu Murgulet Ana that said ~Im restricting your right to
defend yourself is not impartial because she broke the law, article 124 from Romanian
Contitution that states the judge shall only obey the law, thus if the judge has any other interest
than the law, he is not impartial.
On 04.10.2017 I wasnt allowed to study file 4909/231/2017 by so called judge Dinu
Murgulet Ana from courthouse Judecatoria Focsani which also infringes on my guaranteed
constitutional right to defense according to article 24 from the Romanian Constitution. As proof I
invoke the audio recording from room 2 in courthouse Judecatoria Focsani from file
4909/231/2017 on date 04.10.2017 again, mentioning that in general the courthouses refuse to
communicate to me these recordings and falsify the written meeting minutes so they cover up
the illegalities perpetrated by the so-called judges, although the illegalities are evident in the
omission to motivate the sentences. For this purpose I was brought in the courthouse at the last
possible moment by the gendarmes who even stole my pencils to impede me writing a defence,
and for the same purpose they also refused to communicate to me the falsified mandate of
detainment
Also the courthouse Judecatoria Focsani and prosecutors office Parchetul de pe langa
Judecatoria Focsani restricted my right to consult files 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and
4329/P/2016 meaning my right to be communicated scanned copies of papers in this files which I
can use as proof in other judiciary actions such as the present notification, reason for which Ive
sued the prosecutors office as well as the Public Ministry in a file with unknown number at
courthouse Tribunalul Vrancea where I deduce the judgment will be falsified or was already as
all the rest, although the evidence leave no room for defense for the other parties, proving the so
called judges reject my petition without any motivation infringing not just on the right to an
equitable (lawful) process but also the right of access to justice and petitioning, meaning the right
to have my petition solved not covered up by falsified answers.
The right to a fair trial means respecting two general principles, the legality principle
according to article 1 paragraph 5 from Romanian Constitution and the principle of truth finding

Page 24 of 37
according to article 5 from Romanian Penal procedure code, derived from the principle of legality
through juridical logic, principles that constitute the fundamental premises of the inference or
syllogism that constitutes the justification of any judgment that cant strain according to the
universal rules of logic first of all from these two principles. In file 4909/231/2017 regarding my
illegal involuntary psychiatric commitment, the right to a fair trial was infringed upon by so called
judge Dinu Murgulet Ana breaking pervasively any relevant law, going as far as to restrict my right
to defense in several ways, and omitting to motivate how obvious hallucinated thus fictive and
ridiculous accusations against me constitute grounds for my psychiatric commitment and not the
authors or the so called magistrates in 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 be it either
accusers or prosecutors. I bring again into attention the ridiculous accusations in fact - that Ive
disturbed the quietness of the courthouse meeting listening audio books at earphones which I did
before and after this accusation at courthouses Judecatoria Foccsani, Tribunalul Vrancea,
Judecatoria Braila and Tribunalul Bucuresti, without being ever accused of this as a penal
offence because it wouldve been ridiculous - except for the mentally alienated criminals in
Vrancea county who accuse others of mental problems to hide their own. I was also accused
generically of fictional fact such as obscene gestures and words of course unspecified because
they dont exist as the audio recording from room 2 at courthouse Judecatoria Focsani from file
2220/91/2015 at 05.18.2016 proves, recording which I obtained and made it public at address
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-DVmkyBDlog, and I indicate the penal complaint that Ive also
publicized at address: https://www.scribd.com/doc/316190675/dosar-penal-Paun-Ionel-Iulian-
ascultatul-la-casti-e-infractiune, proving the felonies of so called magistrates for the entire
matter, penal complaint that determined I suppose the desperation of this criminals to try and
discredit me and harm me to silence me by committing me psychiatrically to chemically
lobotomize me as they tried before in 14277/231/2015 twice, because in Romania no death in
psychiatric detainment is ever investigated. The last accusation of these last three falsified penal
files against me 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016, is that my defense plea disturbs
the solemnity of the courthouse meeting, again with no demonstration about how or which
words because the accusation is fictional and I used the same plea in all other instances,
inclusively against the same judge without being accused before or after proving it was an order
in the criminal group to set me up. The real problem of so called judge Popa Mariana from
courthouse Tribunalul Vrancea is that the plea for the request for removal of so called judge
Popa Mariana from file 14277/231/2015 based on incompatibility determined both by lack of
impartiality proven by law breaking and various falsified judgments and other papers, and by the
fact so called judge Popa Mariana already addressed files linked to 14277/231/2015 which makes
him incompatible to participate in the same process again, reveals that on purpose so called judge
Popa Mariana commits penal offences against me

2. I was considered guilty without any sentence of condemnation of any kind in

4909/231/2017 - regarding my psychiatric commitment, even more so for obviously fictional
accusations. This infringes on article 6 point 1 from the Convention

Page 25 of 37
 In the falsified penal files 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 the so called
prosecutors successively falsified the ordnances for beginning of penal pursuit (investigation of
facts, in rem), continuation of penal pursuit (investigation of personas, in personam), and penal
pursuit put into action (giving me the quality of accused which they should've done in the first
place if there was an actual penal offence, which still means I'm innocent according to article 6.2
from the Convention "Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until
proven guilty according to law", but before that I'm innocent because there is no case against me,
only fictive and ridiculous accusations),
which means if the penal files were real I shouldve been sent in trial and condemned in
30-60 days according to Romanian Law 304/2004, but instead the so called magistrates refused to
send these penal files in trial as proof they know they are falsified, trying to put in detention
without being condemned abusing the unconstitutional procedure for psychiatric involuntary
commitment by breaking the law, through which they are attempting to put me in a situation of
vulnerability to try and gravely harm me or kill me by injecting me with toxic substances to silence
me, attempt at my life already proven by the fact they instigated on 10.27.2014 and 05.12.2014
the interloper Herghelegiu Danut from Galati to commit the attempt to kill me from which I
escaped injured for which I require over 90 days of medical care for my infirmities of disturbed
sight and endocrine system, instigation or determination proven by the fact the same organized
criminal group of so called magistrates illegally obtained all the penal and civil files against this
interloper, stolen proofs from them and falsified all acts of procedure in 2222/P/2014,
1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) and 246/P/2015 which are the main penal files about the attempt at
my life, and simultaneously with this attempt on my life they invented causes 15730/231/2014
and 2417/P/2014 with psychiatric profile, falsified again by the same so called magistrates which
tried to commit me involuntarily at the psychiatry and inject me with toxic substances to gravely
harm me or kill me to silence me as proven by files 11224/231/2015 about which I remind Ive
annulled the 1sts instance falsified judgment in contestation at courthouse Tribunalul Vrancea
in file with same number 11224/231/2015, and file 14277/231/2015 in which Ive annulled as
inadmissible and unfounded the so called prosecutors proposal that I be obligated to be treated
psychiatrically based on a obviously falsified psychiatric report - easily proven falsified by the fact I
was never psychiatrically interviewed and because it contains contradictions such as I dont have
awareness because I have superior studies, fast thinking and general culture, and lies that I have a
penal history and that Im violent. Through the falsification of this procedure this organized
infractional group tried to elude any criminalist investigation that would pursue which forced me
to leave with trusted persons a declaration that I have no intention to suicide or harm anyone,
which these criminals could lie about to cover up their crimes against me, and which I noticed it
happens in Romania when witnesses are eliminated in notoriety cases such as ex minister
Udreas trial, as presented at Antena 3 news television with all the facts, that suddenly a lively
man with everything to live for, no psychiatric problems background, dies right before hes
suppose to testify. I mention again that the reason these so-called magistrates are using
psychiatry as a weapon of wrongful repression because no death in psychiatric detainment in
Romania is investigated as pointed out by the press following a secret service report to general

Page 26 of 37
prosecutors office regarding the fact psychiatrists use patients for illegal experiments for the
pharmaceutical mafia
Because the falsified judgment in 4909/231/2017 supposes that 1. physical facts exist and
2. the physical facts are penal offences and 3. that I committed the penal offences although
proofs demonstrate the physical facts dont exists and the ones that do arent penal offences thus
nobody committed any penal offences, making abstraction of the fact that all the relevant laws
enumerated before were broken as I pleaded about the infringement of article 3 from the
Convention above,
in conclusion and beyond any reasonable doubt the so-called judge in 4909/231/2017
infringed on the presumption of innocence because I was never trialed let alone condemned even
if innocent, presumption instituted by article 23 paragraph 11 from Romanian Constitution,
transposed in the normative penal matter through articles 4 and 99 from Romanian Penal
procedure code and furthermore, the falsified judgment is based on fictional facts that cant
possible constitute penal offence, which demonstrates again the criminal intent of this organized
criminal group of so called magistrates to put me in detention without condemning me because
of course they know the accusations are fictional and wouldnt sustain themselves at the slightest
scrutiny

3. on date 04.10.2017 I was arrested by 7 (seven) gendarmes and 2 (two) commissars or

prosecutors - cant tell because nobody told who they were as obligated by the law, and at least
one of the gendarmes physically abused me pulling me by my arm from inside the apartment
although I wasnt resisting and afterwards proving that they were a bunch of red-necks they even
stole two pencils they never returned to impede me writing my defense. All this was filmed by
another gendarme while others tried to provoke me, and I invoke this material audio-video proof
to sustain my declarations, which they refused to communicate to me as well as the report they
wrote about the illegal intervention. The refused to tell who they were and where they work, and
they refused to give me the falsified mandate, all required by law, again for the purpose of
impeding me building my defense. This infringes on article 6 point 3 from the Convention "to be
informed promptly ... of the nature and cause of the accusation against him"
Because they refused to present themselves as the law requires, this demonstrates they
are aware that they can answer penally for what they did, for detaining me illegally and abusing
me trying to provoke me, and stealing from me. According to articles 9, 266 and 280 from the
Romanian Penal code of procedure and in accordance with their oath and statute, gendarmes are
obligated to release me as soon as they learned the mandate to detain me is falsified, meaning
they shouldnt have executed it in the first place as nobody can invoke not knowing the law to
absolve himself when committing a penal offence, though I know these psychopaths even if they
didnt know the law they knew they were doing something bad because they were grinning in
satisfaction which assured me they arent plain mentally debilitated but sociopaths, the only
psychopaths to rationalize the evil they do by personal satisfaction. By definition, sociopath
means that person that breaks the law and other peoples rights pervasively and superficially as

Page 27 of 37
these so called gendarmes did and tried to provoke me while filming me, instigated by the so
called judicial functionaries in the penal files 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016

4. as Ive proved regarding the infringement of the right to an equitable or lawful trial
above, for the same reasons of the same demonstration article 6 point 3 letter b from the
Convention was broken "Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum
rights: ...to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence", my right to
defense was infringed upon by being arrested on 04.10.2017 illegally with a falsified mandate of
detainment, without receiving a subpoena before as required by the law, which they omitted on
purpose so I wouldnt have time to prepare a defense, and without communicating to me the
mandate for my detainment to understand why was I arrested, and without permitting me to
consult the file to impeding me to prepare a defense again, and even stealing my pencils to stop
me from writing the abuses down and building a defense in the file I suspected they were
planning to falsify anyway. Because I annulled in contestation at courthouse Tribunalul Vrancea
an identical falsified proposal that I be involuntarily committed psychiatrically in identical file
11224/231/2015, I am aware of the modus operandi of these felons posing as magistrates, as Ive
invoked the exception of the authority of the matter already judged - ne bid idem between
11224/231/2015 and 4909/2331/2017 because in both Ive been accused with fictive facts thus
the matter is identical - fictional accusations which mean more than ne bis idem, means I cant be
sentenced illegally no matter how many times its attempted because the rigors of the law will be
the same as Ive invoked in the demonstration of the infringement of article 3 from the
Convention above. Also Ive invoked the infringement of art. 184 from romanian Penal
procedure code, art. 10-11,17 from Romanian Law 487/2002, articles 22 (1-2), 23 (1-2), art. 26
(2), 27 and 29 from Romanian Constitution and also article 20 from Romanian Constitution and
article 9 and 12 from the Declaration of human rights which prohibits arbitrary or
unjust/unlawful detainment that makes impossible my psychiatric examination through
interview without my consent given in writing, which makes illegal my arrests and my involuntary
psychiatric commitment in this arbitrary manner meaning without a shred of proof of an illicit
deed or at least an immoral one which nullifies any possible attempt to successfully falsify a
report by the so called psychiatrist that proposed without a motivation my psychiatric
commitment. Because I am not accused or suspected of consuming narcotics or alcohol even,
observing me in detention through involuntary psychiatric interning is an aberration meant to
deprive me of liberty illegally most probably for the purpose of harming me, in effect being prison
without condemnation

5. so called judicial functionaries that is policemen and magistrates refused to apply the
procedure regarding confrontation of persons with contradictory declarations according to article
113 from the Romanian Penal procedure code, and refused to take the declarations of the

Page 28 of 37
witnesses named by me, and they refused to administrate the audio material proof recordings of
the courthouse meetings that prove my innocence, one of two which I placed in files
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 myself, proofs that demonstrate the deeds they call
penal offences dont exist materially making the hearing of my witnesses redundant otherwise.
The so called witnesses named against me do not corroborate to the accusations that were
named against me but accuse me of aberrations like the fact a gendarme called me at another
judges request in another meeting at the same courthouse constitutes an act of arrogance on my
part, which raises the legitimate suspicion of the mental sanity of these so-called witnesses and
assures me that these so called magistrates use mentally alienated or debilitated persons for false
witnesses as these penal files 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 prove, which I dont
see how they help them commit penal offences against me. Even more, I've proven their
witnesses contradict themselves in matters that aren't even part of the accusations but prove that
they have some sort of bad will towards me for reasons unknown to me because I don't know
them, meaning they're part of the organized criminal group that falsified the penal files
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016
As proof I demand that the penal files 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 be
brought for examination along with my declarations and conclusions which should be in these
dossiers, because the so called magistrates refused to communicate any papers from these files
as required by the law regarding the falsified ordnances, and as required by the law on my
request, refusal for which Ive called them in trial to be obligated to release the papers in file at
courthouse Tribunalul Vrancea. Because Ive also called in trial the minister of justice from
Ministry of justice, the chief of judicial inspection (CSM/IJ), the general prosecutor of Romania
from Public ministry and other responsible in this penal, disciplinary and administrative matter,
and all refused to take act about the refusal to uphold the law and instead lied to the judge, it is
proven beyond any reasonable doubt that the Romanian judicial system serves criminal interests
only and statistically proven there arent magistrates in Romania, only criminals who serve other
criminals that occupy dignitary functions

III^3. Art. 7 from the Convention No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on
account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or
international law at the time when it was committed.

So called judicial functionaries in 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 accused me

of fictional facts that dont constitute penal offences
1. lying that listening to audio books on earphones can disturb the quietness of the
courthouse meeting with is ridiculous, proven before anything by the fact that I wasnt accused in
the one hour and a half until 10:30 a.m. 05.18.2016, when I was doing the same exact thing I was
accused of after
2. lying that I committed gestures and obscene words without proof and without even
telling what where these fictional gestures and words, contradicting themselves in their own

Page 29 of 37
declarations telling they didnt actually see them but the witnesses did who also didnt see or
heard them, all of which contradict with the audio recording of the courthouse proving there is no
deed therefore there is not penal offence, proof I mention the so called magistrate refused to
administrate, and
3. lying that my plea on subject of proving the incompatibility of so called judge Popa
Mariana disturbs the solemnity of the courthouse meeting because I demonstrate so called judge
Popa Mariana falsifies judgments which proves she is incompatible according to article 64 from
Romanian Penal procedure code, which would mean that all the incompatibility requests for
judge removal from file and any call in trial and penal complaint against a so called judge would
constitute a penal offence as these so called magistrates accused me of repeatedly and falsely,
and means that the so called magistrates which in actuality are criminals, cant be accused of
anything ever which is what exactly happens right now in Romania - so called prosecutors from
the Direction of national anticorruption in Galati rejected a penal complaint motivating that the
magistrates are sovereigns and they do what they will, contradicting themselves with article 2 of
Romanian Constitution that states that nobody can claim sovereignty in his name of the name of
a group - only the Romanian people is sovereign according to law
In conclusion the so called magistrates declared all these deeds are penal offences,
falsified ordnances for penal pursuit in rem, penal pursuit in personam and putting into action the
penal pursuit accusing me with constitutes the penal offence of wrongful repression Represiunea
nedreapta, abusive penal pursuit Cercetarea abuziva and other penal offences
They refused to send me in trial to be condemned or to close the file for almost a year
meaning from 05.18.2016 and as proof I was never convicted until now, nor sent to be judged,
because the organized crime group that falsified this knows I'm innocent.
Actual proof: the conviction must appear in ECRIS and it doesn't exist
Because the deeds dont constitute penal offences the so-called magistrates infringed on
Art. 7 from the Convention

III^4. Art. 8 from the Convention Everyone has the right to respect for ... his home"

The so-called magistrates broke the law by falsifying the mandates for my detainment and
illegally breaking into my mothers home where I was, which also constitutes the penal offence of
property violation Violarea de domiciliu. These so-called magistrates deliberately did this to
disturb my family from spending orthodox Easter as a family, arresting me illegally and repeatedly
on 04.06.2017, 04.10.2017 then attempting to commit me psychiatrically right during orthodox
Easter, breaking again into my mothers home on 13th and 14th of April 2017 although Ive been
telling these criminals since 2014 I dont live there, and they instead threatened my mother they
will break into her home daily, disturbing both my life and my mothers and because of this my
mother has fallen ill with Zoster Area from stress and trauma. I fact I was obligated by these grave
abuses to not spend Easter in family but take refuge, and instead of spending my time freely I was

Page 30 of 37
obligated to work on penal files against these criminals that also constitutes an improper
deprivation of my freedom, by obligating me to defend myself from these crimes
I declare that in the mandates for my detainment there is not justification because there
cant be no justification like in the exceptions: "accordance with the law ... necessary in a
democratic society in the interest of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of
the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for
the protection of the rights and freedoms of others" because the mandates of detainment are
plain illegal meaning contradictory to the law as Ive proven invoking the broken law regarding the
fact I didnt even received a subpoena before a mandate was falsified, and the condition of the
law regarding psychiatric procedures were totally disregarded as I remind and invoke art. 184
from Romanian Penal procedure code, art. 10-11,17 from Romanian Law 487/2002, articles 22
(1-2), 23 (1-2), art. 26 (2), 27 and 29 from Romanian Constitution and also article 20 from
Romanian Constitution and article 9 and 12 from the Declaration of human rights which
prohibits arbitrary or unjust/unlawful detainment , regarding the fact its impossible to examine
me psychiatrically without my consent because the only way is an interview, and its all the more
aberrant to be examined without a reason, all the more aberrant to be interned involuntarily at
the psychiatry ward which is prison without condemnation with constitutes a blatant
infringement of the articles 9 and art. 12 from the Universal declaration of human rights regarding
interdiction of detainment in an arbitrary way, meaning unjustified by law and fact
As proof Im indicating and annexing the mandates I could obtain:
1. the morning illegal arrests on 09.17.2015 when I was detained by 4 masked police and
2 policemen who broke into my home at 6:00 a.m. as an terrorist act - see proof #3 attached, and
2. the morning illegal detainment on 11.12.2015 by two gendarmes. Please obtain this
proof from 14277/231/2015 because Im unable to retrieve it from my mothers home because of
the criminal police who remade the communist Securitatea in so called European province
Vrancea
3. the morning illegal detainment on 04.06.2017 using falsified mandate from 04.05.2017
from 4791/231/2017, attached as proof #2, executed by 2 policemen and 2 masked policemen.
4. the morning illegal arrest on 04.10.2017 using falsified mandate from 04.10.2017 from
4791/231/2017, executed by 7 gendarmes and 2 prosecutors, one gendarme was filming and a
few others were harassing my physically to provoke me, and they even stole two pencils which
refused to return proving their lack of character, for the purpose of impeding me to write my
defense, and refused to leave the falsified mandate as proof and refused to tell who they were as
required by the law
5. the morning illegal attempted arrest on 13th, 14th and 27th of April 2017, threatening my
mother that they will keep breaking into her home although I've told them I don't live there, nor
my papers say that I live there, meaning they are doing it to harass my family if they can't harass
me. They refused to leave the falsified mandates as proof

The falsified mandate from 04.05.2017 from 4791/231/2017 even contains the aberration
that I must be psychiatrically examined because I refused to be psychiatrically examined, which is
in contradiction with article 184 from the Romanian Penal code of procedure, according to which

Page 31 of 37
only a person who consented but refused afterwards to present itself at the examination can be
brought by force, corroborated by articled 10-11 from Law 487/2002 which is only logical because
psychiatry is suppose to be medicine not a punitive measure, and the procedure exists for those
that plead insanity in their defense - I pleaded not guilty because there are no deeds thus there
are no penal offences, only so called magistrates that falsify penal files that should be in jail, and
my conviction and belief in the state of right constitutes the mobile of the penal offences
committed against me by these so called magistrates, that is the fact Im penally pursuing them
using the judicial system to obtain justice for the felonies they committed against me

III^5. Art. 9 from the Convention Everyone has the right to freedom of thought,
conscience..."

My right to free conscience has been infringed upon by making huge pressure though
grave abuses against me using the judicial system and psychiatry as a system of wrongful
repression.

III^6. Art. 10 from the Convention Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.
This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and
ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers "

My right of free expression has been infringed upon by censorship on 04.08.2017 on

militia.freeforums.net where I published a substantial amount of penal complaints against this
criminal group of so-called magistrates. This forum has been closed without any specified reason
meaning on an article of the owners rules of conduct that sais the owner can close his service to
anyone without a reason, however any organization is obligated to respect the civil law and I have
been singled out from a large group of people who use their serviced based on illicit reasons as
my arrests on 04.06.2017 and 04.10.2017 prove, and the attempts that followed on 13th, 14th and
27th of April 2017 corroborate meaning the censorship of militia.freeforums.net is no coincidence,
proven by the lack of infringement of any rule of the owner of those services and the fact the
forum was in Romanian and been up since 2014
Simultaneously on 04.10.2017 a censorship attempt has been made on my facebook
account - a warning again unspecified on any rule I broke was made and a post deleted although I
have tens of posts that break the same fictive unspecified rule - and for that unspecified rule
perhaps all the videos of Assad murdering his citizens should also be deleted but they arent, thus
again Im singled out and discriminated
I mention that militia.freeforums.net served the purpose of being crawled by google bot,
while on my facebook.com account still up I publicized in short the crimes of these so called
magistrates. My account on scribd.com where I published under personal electronic signature the

Page 32 of 37
entire penal complaints with proofs can still be found, and Im working on opening a blog this
time for the search engine crawlers. This is perfectly legitimate according to Romanian Law
544/2001 regarding public information, article 13 - ~information that hide the penal offences of
public functionaries cannot be considered secret or private information
I am certain that the perpetrator of the slanderous and false reclamations against my
right to publish are the same group of criminal so-called magistrates, according to first
investigators rule: cui bono, and Im certain that some high functionaries are in on this illicit
activity because on 04.10.2017 the 7 gendarmes were trying to provoke me while filming me, and
that large disposal of abusive force is not random, and the only other time Ive been filmed is
when the National anticorruption direction under Kovesi Laura Codruta made a mockery of my
witness declarations, filming them though - I remind that Laura Codruta Kovesi prosecutor chief of
DNA is notorious for doing political police instead of her job, falsifying penal files, declarations
and making all sorts of abuses in cahoots with Romanian secret service SRI that Im sure knows
of all these as all my friends do since I publicized, but they didnt investigate and denounced as
the prosecutor general as they shouldve, as proof of their complicity
Because I believe publicizing the abuses against me is my only defense right now and ever
since, and the first thing to do against criminal sociopaths, I do regard this as a matter of urgency
as so the criminal regard me publicizing their crimes an impediment against them, meaning it can
thwart them from committing even worse crimes, but not if they manage to censor my
publications and since this is an effort sustained by corrupt and criminal public functionaries its
all the more a grave matter

III^7. Art. 14 from the Convention The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth
in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race,
color, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a
national minority, property, birth or other status. "

1. Ive been discriminated upon as Ive inductively demonstrated regarding the

infringement upon art. Art. 10 from the Convention

2. Ive been discriminated by social position by the fact Ive filed several psychiatric
interdiction actions to courthouse Judecatoria sectorului 3 Bucuresti, Judecatoria Focsani and
Judecatoria Galati against these so called magistrates, none of which appear in ECRIS because I
called so called magistrates in trial, but all my psychiatric profiled dossiers appear in ECRIS. They
lied that these files are hidden for everyone regarding psychiatric profiled dossiers, as you can
find mine in ECRIS - Romanian public informatics dossiers evidence
Ive notified CNCD (National council for combating discrimination or Consiliul national
pentru combaterea discriminarii), who refused to do its duty and sanction this discrimination.
This I dont regard as a matter of urgency, but proof of illicit activity of magistrates in Romania

Page 33 of 37
and other accomplices, only grave in the matter of censoring the public truth which I use to keep
their crimes at bay

IV. Inventory or proofs and short description

1. proof #1 - representing address from 04.14.2017 from 4909/231/2017 at 2nd instance

meaning in contestation at courthouse Tribunalul Vrancea where the judgment will be
predictably falsified because the judge doesnt obey the law but is obviously bad willed. Whether
the judgment will be falsified or not doesnt really matter because this group of criminal so called
magistrates will keep inventing other fictional accusations and repeat the illegal procedure
arresting and detaining me illegally, meaning it doesnt matter how many times I annul these
This paper proved the falsified judgment of 1st instance in 4909/231/2017 exists as it can
also be found publicly in ECRIS Romanian informatics dossiers evidence that can be easily googled
with key words site:.ro judecatoria focsani without the quotes, then searching the file number
with cautare dosare option
This is part of the matter of urgency
2. proof #2 - representing the falsified mandate of detainment from 04.05.2017 from
4791/231/2017 that contains the aberrant and illegal motivation that I have to be psychiatrically
examined because I refused to be psychiatrically examined, not because Im (wrongfully) accused
of committing a penal offence. I also mention that I received no subpoena for the dates inscribed
in this paper but the so-called judicial functionaries know my email address that I chose for
communication of acts of procedure and they use in other matters. With this I have been
detained ~2 hours with no acts of procedure being made
This is part of the matter of urgency
3. proof #3 - representing the falsified mandate of detainment from 09.10.2015 from
10547/231/2015, unmotivated and illegal. I mentioned I have been detained ~7 hours with no
acts of procedure being made, while the law requires the act of procedures be done immediately
and I be set free immediately
4. proof #4 - representing the proof of falsified judgment in 11224/231/2015 of 1st
instance, identical in law and facts (fictional) to the falsified judgment in 4909/231/2017
5. proof #5 - representing the proof that Ive annulled as unfounded the judgment in
11224/231/2015 regarding my psychiatric commitment
6. proof #6 - representing the proof that Ive annulled as unfounded the judgment in
11224/231/2015 regarding my psychiatric commitment
7. proof #7 - representing the proof that Ive annulled as inadmissible the falsified
proposal that I be subjected to psychiatric medical treatment, in 1st instance in 14277/231/2015
8. proof #8 - representing the proof that Ive annulled as unfounded the falsified proposal
and prosecutors contestation that I be subjected to psychiatric medical treatment, in 2nd instance
in 14277/231/2015

Page 34 of 37
 * as I declared before, I havent been communicated the other papers on purpose to
impede my complaints but Ive proven the existence of these abuses plenty, and indicated the
exact institutions to be addressed for communication of the papers by addressing them on the
Romanian government responsible for them
* I mention that I believe Ive notified all responsible institutions in Romania, that is CSM -
Superior magistrate council holding the disciplinary action, PICCJ - general prosecutors office and
other subordinates of his according to hierarchy and material competence, MJ - ministry of
justice, IGPR - general inspectorate of police, IGJR - general inspectorate of gendarmes, even the
prime minister and presidential administration, all of which proved being accomplices in this
criminal activity by refusing to do their duty, either start disciplinary or penal pursuit, and observe
the lawful outcome. Because of the urgent nature of this request which differs from normal
procedure of appealing to ECHR, I will make the full list of petitions to the Romanian authorities
in the normal procedure as it is irrelevant to the urgent matter at hand, or provide the list on
request as it would take some time to accomplish
The complaints according to article 340 of Romanian Penal procedure code should be
seen in ECRIS, that is the fact its impossible to nullify any abuse in the Romanian judicial system
at least for me although Ive tried for years with tens of such complaints and more penal
complaints and civil actions, thus my address towards ECHR is thoroughly justified both in the
matter urgency and the fact that there is no possible solution to be obtained in Romania because
there is no state of right and judicial system here

V. Damage claims

I claim 250,000 lei (~55,555 euro - fifty five thousand euro and five hundred fifty five, that
is 250,000 lei / 4.5 lei for one euro) moral damages or non-pecuniary damage for each distinct
abuse, based on notorious Romanian case Kovesi vs Antena 3 in which Kovesi so called
anticorruption prosecutor chief was awarded 250.000 lei for image and dignity damages, and
according to article 16 and 124 from Romanian Constitution which is in accordance with European
law - all Romanian citizens have equal rights before law and justice, and nobody's above the law. I
base my claims on the fact I am suffering psychosomatically from deprivation of liberty, rest, and
stressed through irrational unlawful behavior of the so-called Romanian authorities which caused
me grief and anxiety, resulting in sleep and gastric disorders as all people experience in problems
associated with stress. Because these proceedings are public in ECRIS Romanian public files
evidence, both my public image and my dignity have been gravely damaged being associated with
arrests and psychiatric files, far more than Kovesi claimed in her case about being slandered by
the press thus this sum is in actuality a minimum, leaving the actual sum at the court's
appreciation

Page 35 of 37
 Total: illegal arrests/attempts: 09.17.2015, 12.11.2015, 04.06.2017, 04.10.2017,
04.13.2017, 04. 14.2017, 04.27.2017 plus
falsified slanderous judgments in public: 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015,
14277/231/2015, and 4909/231/2017 means 55,555 x 11 = 611105 euro (six hundred thousand
eleven, one hundred five).
This sum is equitable in Romanian judicial jurisdiction, and because Romania is a member
of European Union, it is also equitable in European judicial jurisdiction

I also claim 142,85 euro material damages or pecuniary damage for each day in which
either the abuse was perpetrated that caused me to waste time and energy, the days having
terms in court which I must observe again wasting time and energy, plus 142,85 for each 10 pages
of written plea in my defense which I write myself not affording a lawyer but my time being no
less valuable than any other man's thus I'm entitled to reparation for my time and effort spent on
defending myself which I was obligated to not chosen to, meaning this time and effort is a
damage done to me. This damage includes of course the time I took to document myself on the
law, and as fact there are very few lawyers who actually learn their trade as I observed regarding
my case where in each instance I pleaded net superior to my default advocate paid by the state,
and the ones that do disserve their pay are unaffordable by physical personas to hire thus my
effort is justified as being my legitimate interest to get the best defense available to me and my
possibilities - my own
142,85 euro is the reasonable remuneration for my day's work according to my last
profession in Romania (IT programmer) and because I did not wish to waste this time but was
taken from me, I regard this time as supplementary "work", thus I claim the usual pay for
supplementary work - 142,85 euro times 2 / day wasted or 10 pages of written plea which I
observe it takes a working day together with case documentation. The sum of 142,85 euro is
obtained by dividing the average salary of an IT programmer in Romania according to all found
statistics on job portals such as bestjobs.ro, of 3000 euro to 21 working days in a month

Total: 09.17.2015, 12.11.2015, 04.06.2017, 04.10.2017, 04.13.2017, 04.14.2017,

04.27.2017, 15370/231/2014, 11224/231/2015, 14277/231/2015 and 4909/231/2017 means
142,85 x 11 x 2 = 3142.7 euro, and the files of my plea mean 142,85 x [(15730/231/2014 - ~ 10
pages) (11224/231/2015 - ~40 pages) +( 14277/231/2015 - 120 pages) + (4909/231/2017 - 30
pages)] / 10 x 2 = 142,85 x 20 x 2 = 5714 euro, to a total of 3142.7 + 5714 = 8856.7 euro in
material damages, proven by my request to bring the mentioned files from the courthouse
Judecatoria Focsani where youll find much more - the page count is a rough minimal estimate
as counting fictional money that I may not be awarded is not my concern right now but my safety.
I mention I did not count the several terms and months 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015 and
14277/231/2015 took, I just made a minimal approximation where in fact observing the
proceedings took several days as I've also sent unconstitutionality requests to Romanian
Constitutional Court regarding the normative acts that were opposed to my constitutional rights
that were null of right as of fact. The date 12.11.2015 is part of 14277/231/2015 when I was
unlawfully deprived of liberty held for no reason for hours inside the "Judecatoria Focsani"

Page 36 of 37
courthouse by the gendarmes and the so-called judge's order, thus I regard it as a separate abuse,
and the fact I won in 14277/231/2015 does not excuse the abuses done within the process, as in
the judge invoking an abrogated law to reject my request to appeal to Romanian Constitutional
court about the unconstitutionality of the norms opposed to my rights, or the requests for
revocation of the judge who was showing clear signs on lack of objectivity during the process. Not
upholding the law is a clear offense to article 6.1. of ECRH, the right to an equitable trial, where
equitable means lawful. The fact about 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015
is that they are a blatant slander to my name being associated with courthouse action with
psychiatric profile, and I mention I filed such actions against the so called magistrates (in Romania
prosecutors are magistrates) that made them, and they were hidden from the public which means
discrimination by social position - this can be easily confirmed by consulting with the Romanian
authorities, supposedly there is a normative act by CSM (Supreme magistrate council in Romania)
that discriminates in ECRIS between magistrates and the rest of the citizens

P.S. abuses on 04.13.2017, 04.14.2017 and 04.27.2017 were perpetrated against my

family as I had to leave home because of the repetitive abusive arrests, which instead created
vicissitudes for me also for which I also claim moral damages for forcing me to be in situations I
did not wish to be, which infringes on my liberty, but they kept breaking illegally into my mother's
home on these dates which causes me grief and as it does to my mother too who has fallen ill
with Zoster Area because of the stress and trauma and because police and gendarmes threatened
her they will do this every day. Because these criminal so called police and gendarmes are in
cahoots with apartment breaking bands of gypsies as everyone knows here, this is all the more
dangerous and cause for concern. Recently according to Romanian press a felon knowing the
bank director of Transilvania bank in Romania was regularly searched at home by police, he
impersonated a policemen and heisted the apartment with the owners at home at gun point. My
mother can't tell the difference and there is no difference because all the "policemen" refuse to
tell who they are and most of the time refuse to leave copies of the search mandate as required
by the law anyway. The only notable difference between Romanian policemen and regular felons
is that Romanian policemen almost never answer for their crimes, and so called Romanian
magistrates never answer for their crimes even after being proven abusive at ECHR, and the
Romanian law requires it meaning the magistrate mafia situated itself above the law as they did
with their salaries anyway, 5-15 in average illegally greater than the rest of Romanians with
superior studies

18.April.2017

To the president of the European court of human rights

Page 37 of 37
PROOF #1
 PROOF #2

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com

 PROOF #3

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com

PROOF #4
 PROOF #5

Tudor Raneti

From: Veronica Petrescu <veronica.petrescu@just.ro>

Sent: 28 octombrie 2015 11:47
To: tudor.raneti@gmail.com
Subject: solutie dosar nr. 11224/231/2015 - contestatie - 28.10.2015

Dosar nr. 11224/231/2015

ROMNIA
TRIBUNALUL VRANCEA
SECIA PENAL
NCHEIERE
edina din camera de consiliu de la 28.10.2015
Instana constituit din:
Judector de drepturi i liberti: Dorel Hrbor
Grefier: Veronica Lucu

MINISTERUL PUBLIC Parchetul de pe lng Tribunalul Vrancea a fost reprezentat de procuror

Gheorghe Mihaila

.
N NUMELE LEGII,
DISPUNE

n baza art. 184 alin. 18 C.pr.pen., admite contestaie formulat de suspectul RANETI TUDOR
ANDREI, nscut la data de 10.10.1980, n Mun. Focani, jud. Vrancea, cu domiciliul n Bucureti, sector 3, str.
THEODOR PALLADY, nr. 2, bl. M2A, sc. B, ap. 61, cu adresa de coresponden aleas la
tudor.raneti@gmail.com, mpotriva ncheierii din 12.10.2015, pronunat de Judectoria Focani.
Desfiineaz ncheierea din 12.10.2015, pronunat de Judectoria Focani i n rejudecare, respinge
ca nefondat propunerea de internare medical nevoluntar, formulat de Parchetul de pe lng Judectoria
Focani.
Cheltuielile judiciare rmn n sarcina statului.
Onorariul pentru aprtorul din oficiu, n cuantum de 130 lei, va fi avansat din fondurile Ministerului de
Justiie.
DEFINITIV.
Pronunat n camera de consiliu, astzi, 28.10.2015.

JUDECTOR DE DREPTURI I LIBERTI GREFIER

Dorel Hrbor Veronica Lucu

1
PROBA #6
PROBA #7
 Dlui Tudor Andrei RANETI
Bd. Unirii 28 bl. 28 sc. 1 ap. 5
FOCANI jud. Vrancea
ROMANIA

ECHR-LE2.0aR 26 April 2017

DIL/rch
BY POST AND E-MAIL at tudor.raneti@gmail.com
Our Ref. 31061/17

Dear Sir,

I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence on 26 April 2017 requesting the European

Court of Human Rights under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court to urge the Romanian authorities to
repeal the provisions of Article 184 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This application falls outside the scope of Rule 39 and therefore it has not been submitted to
a judge for decision. The Court will not, therefore, inform the Romanian authorities of your
request.

The Court applies Rule 39 only where an applicant faces an imminent risk of serious and
irreparable damage. The vast majority of cases in which Rule 39 is applied concern deportation and
extradition proceedings and involve complaints that the applicant will be at real risk of a violation of
Article 2 (the right to life) or Article 3 (the right not to be subjected to torture or inhuman treatment)
of the Convention, if sent to the destination State.

I would be grateful if you would inform me as soon as possible whether you wish to continue
with your complaints under the Convention. If so, you must send the original of the complete
application form together with copies of all supporting documents including those already sent. If
no such information is received, the file will be destroyed in due course without further notice.

Yours faithfully,
For the Registrar

D. Lupu
Legal Secretary

Enc. Application pack (by post only)

 The Registrar
European Court of Human Rights
Council of Europe
F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex
+33 (0)3 88 41 39 00

I the applicant Raneti Tudor Andrei formulate this followup on file 31061/17
through which I inform The Court of the following development:
I. registrar D.Lupu is a penal offender by falsifying the address from 26.April.2017 from
31061/17 for the purpose of impeding judgement sent to me at email: tudor.raneti@gmail.com, being
an accomplice to the fellonies commited against me for which I requested interim measures and urgent
judgement against Romania - I will register a penal file against registrar D.Lupu both in Romania as
well as local penal authorities in Strasbourg, and I request that you will hand him over to the authorities
as well. I will also call him to be placed under interdiction in Romania along with all the other penal
offenders. As proof I point to the address dated 26.April.2017 sent by registrar D.Lupu on which I will
demonstrate his penal fellonies of falsifying the address flagrantly impeding judgement without right:
1. Registrar D.Lupu lies that, I quote This application falls outside the scope of Rule 39...
because according to juridical logic and principle of suficient rationality - ~for every declaration there
must be a demonstration, that is for the categorical declaration quoted above there must be a
demonstration which doesnt exist because there cant be any, the declaration being thus a lie evidently
as my request for interim measures demonstration Ive made regarding inclusively infringements on
Articles 3 and 8 proves, as well regarding the urgency as the request for interim measures requires
2. According to Rule 39 (interim measures), The Registrar has no right to reject an aplication
for interim measure, even more if lying for the purpose of covering up grave penal offences.
As proof I quote from Rule 39: The Chamber or, where appropriate, the President of the Section
or a duty judge ... at the request ... or of their own motion, indicate to the parties any interim measure
which they consider... and The Registrar is obviously neither, his function being to convey information
not be a factor of decision according to Rule 17 ...shall be the channel for all communications and
notifications made by, or addressed to, the Court...
3. Registrar D.Lupu lies implying through the second paragraph that my request does not
demonstrate as I quote from my request for interim measures through which I indicated the object of
the request: certainty of illegal loss of freedom, risk to life or of torture, inhuman or degrading
punishment or treatment, ill-treatment or other serious harm, risk of social exclusion, risk of a
flagrant denial of justice, risk to private and family life, health and conditions of detention, right to a
fair trial and legal representation, flagrant breaking the articles 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14 from the
Convention.
In fact my request for interim measures proves a group of criminal so called magistrates first
instigated an interloper to kill me on 27.10.2014 and 05.12.2014 to stop my penal pursuit against their
crimes against me from before, then at almost the same time learning the attempt failed falsified causes
15730/231/2014, 2417/P/2014, 10547/231/2015, 11224/231/2015, 14277/231/2015, 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016, 4329/P/2016 to cover up their instigation to kill me which Ive proven, and as short proof

Pagina 1 din 2
in all these files Ive never been convicted or psychiatrically interned until now because I know the law
and Ive annuled all their grave abuses and falsified acts until now when they flagrantly seem to have
gathered enough support to consume their criminal intent, manifested by a quick series of illegal arrests
for the purpose of falsifying again the psychiatric procedure again through which they intend to cover up
the murder - in Romania all the deaths in conjuncture with psychiatry remain uninvestigated
Thus, the first paragraph from registrars D.Lupu address provides a grossly incomplete
abstraction of the interim measures request that includes example of two proposals for how the grave
abuses can be stopped, not being my obligation to provide proposals but my interest. This is part of the
attempt to cover up the grave abuse that compelled me to file a request for interim measures
4. Registrar D.Lupu lies implying I should be sending the whole interim measures
request again through a fictive form which he doesnt indicate it exists because it doesnt as far
as Ive investigated - all the guides that Ive read dont indicate any form, but all indicate that
the request for interim measures must be, I quote: Every request is examined individually. The
procedure is a written one. - file PD_interim_measures_intro_ENG.pdf; Requests to be made
by facsimile or letter - thus not submission of a form, according to file
PD_interim_measures_ENG.pdf ; Requests for interim measures must be submitted to the Court
with the applicants consent and should preferably be accompanied by a properly completed
application form - file Interim_Measures_ENG.pdf, thus this is not a categorical condition as far
as I know and Ive used the overall structure used in the form for normal applications according to
Rule 47, for which there is an exception for Rule 39 as I quote:
5.1. Failure to comply with the requirements set out in paragraphs 1 to 3 of this Rule will result in the
application not being examined by the Court, unless
(b) the application concerns a request for an interim measure;
Furthermore, followups or request that the court pursue the application are not required to
contain all the original request for interim measures, which is obviously registered under a number
existing in the Courts archive as 31061/17. As proof I quote from the guides: V. Follow-up
Applicants who apply for an interim measure under Rule 39 should ensure that they reply to
correspondence from the Courts Registry. In particular, where a measure has been refused, they should
inform the Court whether they wish to pursue the application. Where a measure has been applied, they
must keep the Court regularly and promptly informed about the state of any continuing domestic
proceedings. Failure to do so may lead to the case being struck out of the Courts list of cases. - and as
you see theres no mention of any forms or requirement to file the entire request along with evidence
all over again which is logically absurd
II. Because registrar D.Lupu falsified address from 26.April.2017 from 31061/17, I request
that the Court acknowledges that I obviously wish to pursue the original application 31061/17 that I
request be reinstated, analysed and acted upon. I mention I will simultaneously notify romanian
constitutional court, as well as all the major international press with the request for interim measures
which may result in ECHR discreditation if it fails to process it

28.April.2017
To the president of the European court of human rights

Pagina 2 din 2