Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A. I. IVANOV
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Infectious and Parasitic Diseases,
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Trakia University, Stara Zagora; Bulgaria
Summary
Ivanov, A. I., 2010. Giardia and giardiasis. Bulg. J. Vet. Med., 13, No 2, 6580.
The review summarizes the information related to contemporary taxonomy of species within the
Giardia genus. The established genotypes of Giardia duodenalis are presented. Data from research
carried out on the main aspects of epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical signs, diagnosis and treatment
of giardiasis in humans and animals are analyzed. The major subjects of interest for future investiga-
tions are outlined.
Key words: Giardia, giardiasis, G. duodenalis, zoonoses
It has a convex dorsal surface and a large traits and host specificity. At present, 5
ventral adhesive (sucking) disc. The cell is Giardia species are recognized according
binucleated, with four pairs of flagella and to host species and protozoan morpho-
a pair of delineated median bodies. Cysts logy: G. duodenalis, G. agilis, G. muris,
are oval-shaped with a thin hyaline wall G. ardeae and G. psittaci (Table 1). The
and dimensions 812/710 m. Initially, species G. duodenalis (syn. G. intesti-
they are binucleated. The mature cyst has nalis, G. lamblia) is the only one encoun-
four nuclei, curved median bodies and tered in men and more domestic and wild
longitudinal axonemes. mammals (Thompson, 2002).
It is considered that Giardia originated The advances in methods for culti-
from primitive single-celled organisms vation of Giardia allowed to cultivate
because of their simple intracellular orga- individual isolates and to produce enough
nization lacking mitochondria and peroxi- material for genotyping purposes via allo-
somes (Simpson et al., 2002). That is why zyme electrophoresis. As a result, a lot of
Giardia play an important role in the evidence for the genetic diversity within
elucidation of the evolution of eukaryotes. the G. duodenalis species has been col-
lected. However, not all isolates of the
TAXONOMY AND SPECIES parasite could be studied through in vitro
cultures. This is valid for a major part of
The Giardia genus belongs to type Sarco- human and canine isolates and is the main
mastigophora, class Zoomastigophorea, cause for the inadequate research on epi-
order Diplomonadida, family Hexa- demiology and transmission of Giardia.
mitidae. In studies performed between The introduction of PCR techniques
1920 and 1930, more than 50 Giardia has made cultivation unnecessary as they
species are described, distinguished by the allowed the direct identification of para-
host species in which they parasitize. In sites in faecal and environmental samples.
1952, Filice revised the differentiation Differentiation of existing genotypes has
criteria on the basis of morphological been performed (Hopkins et al., 1997,
able 1. Giardia species (Thompson, 2002)
66 BJVM, 13, No 2
A. I. Ivanov
1999; Monis et al., 1998; Van Keulen et lates from wild rodents (voles and musk-
al., 1998). Multiple PCR studies, analysis rats). Some Giardia genotypes exhibit a
of specific genetic loci (rDNA) and narrower host specificity, especially those
investigations on the variety of genes, isolated from cats, dogs, rats, voles, musk-
especially those encoding glutamate de- rats and hoofed animals.
hydrogenase (GDH), elongation factor 1
alfa (ef1-) and triosephosphate isomerase PATHOGENESIS
(tpi), revealed a big genetic diversity in
the G. duodenalis group (Monis et al., The pathogenesis of giardiasis is not
1996; 1998; 1999; Hopkins et al., 1997, completely investigated. Giardia lives and
1999. It was proved that G. duodenalis replicates asexually on the small intesti-
was not a single species, but a group of nes surface of hosts. According to the
species with genetic and phenotype diffe- most recent studies, giardiasis is a comp-
rences. These species are joined in mor- lex of pathophysiological alterations. One
phologically close genotypes that exhibit of them is the changed permeability of
differences in host specificity (Thompson, enterocytes resulting from the cytopatho-
1998; Thompson et al., 1999, 2000; Mo- logical effect of parasites metabolites
nis & Thompson, 2003). Eight genotypes (Buret et al., 2002a; 2002b). Peripheral
are formed A, B, C, D, E, F, G and a membrane proteins, in particular zonula
group without a name. The geographic occludin-1 (ZO-1) that is important for the
distribution of these G. duodenalis geno- regulation of epithelial permeability, are
types is wide. destroyed. As a result, enterocytic brush
Giardia isolates from humans belong border is damaged, the epithelial perme-
to two assemblages A and B, and the ability is increased, resulting in inflamma-
genetic differences between them are tion and gastrointestinal troubles (Scott et
more than those specific for other proto- al., 2002). Giardia also trigger apoptosis
zoan species (Andrews et al., 1989; Maur- causing loss of epithelium barrier function
hofer et al., 1995; Monis et al., 1996; with a subsequent increase in permeability
Monis & Thompson, 2003). Additional (Chin et al., 2002). Apoptosis and severity
subgroups are also reported in each of disease are determined by strain-
assemblage. Isolates from Assemblage A dependent virulent factors of the parasite
belong to two subgroups: I and AII. as well as by physiological and immunolo-
Subgroup AI consists of closely related gical status of the host (Chin et al., 2002;
animal and human isolates. The extent of Scott et al., 2002). It is established that
their geographic areal is high and they the increased intestinal permeability could
have a significant zoonotic potential. Sub- also result from increased luminal anti-
group AII consists only of human isolates. gens. This could provoke the appearance
Assemblage B includes the subgroups III of allergic reactions a complication, of-
and IV, the latter being human-specific. ten observed in humans infected with
Assemblages C and D consist only of ca- Giardia (Scott et al., 2002; Chakarova,
nine isolates, group E isolates from pro- 2004; Chakarova et al., 2009).
ductive animals (cattle, sheep, pigs). Giardiasis depends on both the para-
Assemblage F comprises feline Giardia site and the host. Its variability is mani-
isolates, and group G isolates from rats. fested in symptoms, clinical signs and the
The group without a name includes iso- severity of the disease. The described
pathophysiological changes could be
BJVM, 13, No 2 67
Giardia and giardiasis
encountered in most infected hosts but (Thompson et al., 1990; Monis &
their consequences could vary according Thompson, 2003).
to nutrition mode, the immune status and On the basis of the information about
accompanying enteric infections. Chronic the transmission of Giardia in the
giardiasis in underfed infants infected with different animal species and men, and the
other parasites such as Hymenolepis or genetic data for G. duodenalis assemb-
Ancylostoma is a primary factor for stun- lages, four cycles of transmission ensuring
ted growth or development (Thompson, the contact of the parasite with mam-
2002; Sackey et al., 2003). In young ani- malian host, are determined.
mals with deficient nutrition, overcrow- The transmission from human to
ding or low temperature stress, Giardia human occurs indirectly through water
could be an additional factor for a severe and food contaminated with cysts or
disease. It is believed that they could be the directly, when hygiene is poor. In direct
cause for mortality encountered among the transmission the conditions are favou-
nestling ibis (Mc Roberts et al., 1996). rable, the incidence is high and the preva-
lence of specific genotypes could be
EPIDEMIOLOGY expected. A study on Giardia from men
and dogs living in one community has
Data about the host specificity of Giardia shown that human isolates were from
collected so far are contradictory. The Assemblages A and B whereas canine
results from experimental cross infections isolates from C and D (Hopkins et al.,
showed both host-adapted species and 1997). Only one exception was recorded
species infecting a wide range of hosts. a dog with mixed B and C infection,
Experimental cross infections are not probably transmitted from a men. Another
considered reliable partly because expe- investigation of giardiasis among gorillas
rimental animals could not be free from in a protected territory in Uganda demon-
Giardia and partly because the high doses strated that they were infected with
of infective cysts used are not likely to Assemblage A and that rangers were
occur in a natural infection (Thompson et probably responsible for the infection
al., 1990; Monis & Thompson, 2003). (Graczyk et al., 2002). In a study
The utilization of non-genotyped isolates examining 35 human samples performed
in these experiments further limits their in the UK, 64% were found to be from
application. The analysis of results from Assemblage B, 27% from II and the rest
cross-infection is hindered by the contra- from groups and II (Amar et al.,
dictory data for success and failure to 2002). A similar research performed in
reproduced cross infections in various Australia showed that infections with
animal species. The cause is probably in Giardia from Assemblage B were more
the genetic variances of used isolates, common (70%) as compared to those
differences in cysts viability, immune sta- from Assemblage (30%) (Read et al.,
tus of experimental hosts or the low 2001). The Assemblage B genotype has
sensitivity of diagnostic techniques. Im- provoked an infection in 21/24 children
portant data evidencing that dogs could be (88%) from a nursery in the UK (Amar et
infected with Giardia from Assemblage al., 2002). The ratio of infections by
AI and that beavers are susceptible to in- Assemblages B and A in 18 people from
fection with human Giardia strains are ob-
tained from cross-infection studies
68 BJVM, 13, No 2
A. I. Ivanov
communities growing tea in Assam, India sion is observed in infected calves as well
was 61% to 39% (Traub et al., 2004). as in chronically infected adult cattle but
A small part of human samples is still transmission rate is the highest in dairy
genotyped and therefore, the distribution calves (Xiao & Herd, 1994; OHandley et
and the prevalence of genotypes infecting al., 1999; 2000).
men could not be determined. Genetic Calves are reported to be hosts of one
studies have provided data for the viru- out of two G. duodenalis genotypes. The
lence of genotypes from Assemblages A livestock Assemblage E is the most
and B. Children in kindergartens from frequently encountered among cattle. Re-
Perth, Western Australia, infected with search carried out in Canada and Australia
Giardia from Assemblage A exhibited has proved that a small part of cattle in
diarrhoea 26 times more frequently than herds (<20%) could harbour more patho-
those infected by parasites from Assemb- genic, human-infecting Giardia from
lage B (Read et al., 2001). The children Assemblage A (OHandley et al., 2000;
infected with Giardia from Assemblage B Appelbee et al., 2002). Also, more de-
were not treated and stayed in kinder- tailed and extensive studies in dairy cattle
gartens. A similar situation was observed herds in Australia have shown that 100%
in Aboriginal communities in northern of calves were infected during the first 12
Australia when giardiasis was implicated weeks of life with the livestock genotype.
as a cause for alimentary disorders and Investigations among domestic dogs
suboptimal growth and development. In and cats in Australia revealed that G.
them, isolates from Assemblage B were duodenalis was the commonest intestinal
more commonly found than those from parasite (Bugg et al., 1999; McGlade et
assemblage A (Thompson & Meloni, al., 2003). It is widely distributed in the
1993; Meloni et al., 1995; Hopkins et al., USA and frequently encountered among
1999). Similar data are reported by Miteva pets in other countries as well (Thompson
et al. (2009), observing that a higher & Robertson, 2003). It is established that
proportion (66.7%) of people with mixed Giardia infections of companion animals
Giardia infection from genotypes AII and are underestimated. Investigations on ca-
B exhibited clinical disease than those nine giardiasis showed that this species is
infected only with genotype B (41.5%). infected by two genotypes their own and
Among cattle, giardiasis is widely pre- the zoonotic one.
valent and the degree of infection is high Wild animals are carriers of own
(Thompson, 2000; Olson et al., 2004). Giardia genotypes but are also susceptible
Giardia has been established in beef and to infection by zoonotic assemblages.
dairy cattle with prevalence of 100% The major part of beavers, nutrias and
(Xiao & Herd, 1994; OHandley et al., deers from North America are infected
1999; OHandley, 2002; Ralston et al., with Giardia with infection rate over 50%
2003). Faecal cysts appear about the age (Rickard et al., 1999; Dinlap & Thies,
of 4 weeks. Calves exhibit the highest cyst 2002; Dixon et al., 2002; Heitman et al.,
shedding (105106 cysts/g) at the age of 2002). Data about the specific genotype
412 weeks (OHandley et al., 1999; are however few. Recent investigations
Ralston et al., 2003). Increased cyst exc- confirmed that beavers and white-tailed
retion rate has been observed near the par- deers were carriers of zoonotic G. duode-
turition (Ralston et al., 2003). Transmis-
BJVM, 13, No 2 69
Giardia and giardiasis
nalis genotypes (Apellbee et al., 2002; proved that the concentration of Giardia
Trout et al., 2003). was lower in wild animals, but in aquatic
The genotyping of Giardia from wild mammalian species such as beavers and
marsupials in Australia showed that they muskrats it was quite high. These results
were infected with a new, genetically should be interpreted in relation to data
different genotype (Adams & Thompson, for the Giardia genotypes encountered in
2002). Various Giardia genotypes have these mammals (Thompson, 2004).
been established in rodents and most birds The highest zoonotic risk comes from
(McRoberts et al., 1996; Thompson, 2002; Giardia of Assemblage I and at a lesser
Monis & Thompson, 2003). Thus, the extent, of Assemblage B. There are
established high percentage of infection animal-specific genotypes that are host-
among a wide range of wild animals could specific for productive animals, dogs
not be a hazard for human health (Kettle- and rodents. There are no evidence that
well et al., 1998). Another survey in hou- they appear frequently among humans and
se mice from two Australian islands exhi- therefore their zoonotic risk is assessed as
bited that the animals were carrying seve- minimal. Cattle breeding is a potential risk
ral different Giardia genotypes (Moro et for soil and surface water contamination
al., 2003). Zoonotic genotypes were en- (Donham, 2000), but with very little risk
countered in mice on both islands, but the for the population. The genotyping per-
source of infections has not been identified. formed in North America and Australia
Data from molecular studies proved has shown that the livestock genotype was
that productive animals, pets and wild prevailing in cattle (OHandley et al.,
animals were carriers of zoonotic and 2000; Hoar et al., 2001). They are suscep-
host-specific G. duodenalis genotypes tible for infection by zoonotic Giardia
(Thompson, 2002). Giardia are conside- genotypes and infected calves shed about
red zoonotic agents by the WHO (WHO, 105 t 106 cysts/g (Xiao, 1994; OHandley
1979), transmitted either directly by the et al., 1999). his way, a number of
faecal-oral route or through water. calves infected with parasites from
The consumption of water from un- Assemblage A could be hazardous for the
reliable sources is a considerable risk with farm personnel either directly or indi-
regard to infection with Giardia (Hoque et rectly, by water contamination. The stu-
al., 2002; Jakubowski & Graun, 2002). dies show that zoonotic genotypes appear
The major part of human giardiasis only transiently among cattle especially
outbreaks due to filtered water sources are when the transmission rate of the livestock
attributed to flaws and damage (Jaku- genotype (Assemblage E) is high. This is
bowski & Graun, 2002). Irrigation waters probably due to competition among the
used for raw food processing are also at different Giardia genotypes. On the other
high risk for infection with Giardia side, research carried out in the National
(Thurston-Enriquez et al., 2002). Water Park of Uganda has shown that men were
contamination may be of human, agricul- a source for giardiasis for wild animals
tural or wild animal origin (Heitman et al., and dairy cows (Graczyk et al., 2002).
2002). Sewage waters most commonly The detection of Giardia isolates
contained Giardia but the concentration morphologically identical to G. duodena-
of cysts was lower as compared to that of lis in wild mammals is one of the main
cattle faeces. Several investigations have factors to determine Giardia as zoonotic
70 BJVM, 13, No 2
A. I. Ivanov
agents. Yet, the role of wild animals as a Australian study, genotypes of Assemb-
source of infection for men is not clear. lage A and the canine genotype of Assem-
Water is the main route of zoonotic blage D were found simultaneously in
transmission of Giardia. A relationship dogs (Thompson et al., 1999). It is there-
between infected wild animals (beavers) fore assumed that two cycles of trans-
and humans drinking from the same water mission could occur: one only among
source is evidenced, but the information dogs and another between pets and their
about the genotypes involved in water- owners (Thompson, 2004). Bugg et al.
borne infections in wild animals and men (1999) established that dogs in kennels
is scarce (Thompson, 2004). were more often infected with Giardia
Wild animals, and aquatic mammals in compared to dogs reared individually. A
particular, are often infected with Giardia, survey among domestic dogs in Japan
but few data are provided to assume that demonstrated that all isolates belonged to
these infections are a primary source for the specific Assemblage D (Abe et al.,
water contamination. Probably, these 2003). Epidemiological studies in isolated
animals are infected from water contami- endemic areas where the transmission rate
nated with human or least probably, ani- of zoonotic and non-zoonotic genotypes is
mal faeces (Monzingo & Hibler, 1987; high (for instance, Aboriginal communi-
Bemrick & Erlandsen, 1988; Thompson et ties in Australia) showed that dog-specific
al., 1990; Thompson, 1998). A study Giardia genotypes prevailed among infec-
genotyping Giardia obtained from bea- ted dogs (Hopkins et al., 1997). On the
vers confirmed the hypothesis that these contrary, among men and dogs from tea-
animals were probably infected by a growing communities in Assam, north-
human source (Monzingo & Hibler, 1987; eastern India, 20% of dogs were infected
Richard et al., 1999; Dixon et al., 2002). with Giardia from zoonotic genotypes,
In one study (Appelbee et al., 2002), 12 mainly from Assemblage A, probably a
out of 113 (10.6 %) beaver faecal samples result of the close contacts between men
were positive for Giardia from the and their pets (Traub et al., 2002).
Assemblage A zoonotic genotype. In conditions when giardiasis is com-
Investigations on some molluscs mon for dogs and humans, dogs would be
demonstrated that they could be an impor- continuously exposed to infection with
tant indicator for the presence of patho- canine and zoonotic G. duodenalis
gens in water. In North America, Giardia genotypes (Hopkins et al., 1997; Thomp-
isolates from clams have been genotyped son, 2002). Australian Aboriginal commu-
(Graczyk et al., 1999) and all isolates nities are endemic areas with high fre-
were shown to belong to Assemblage A, quency of Giardia transmission and high
i. e. a sign for contamination from mam- infection rates in children and dogs, often
malian, possibly human faeces. Such wa- over 50% (Meloni et al., 1993; Thomp-
ter-filtering molluscs could accumulate son, 2002). Experimental data show that
pathogens from water sources and after dog-specific genotypes inhibit competiti-
genotyping, they could serve as bioindi- vely the other genotypes and prevent their
cators for contamination with Giardia development in canine small intestine
cysts (Thompson, 2004). (Thompson et al., 1996). In households
The clinical importance of Giardia and tea-growing communities in India, the
isolates from dogs and cats is minor. In an frequency of dog-to-dog transmission was
BJVM, 13, No 2 71
Giardia and giardiasis
lower than that of genotype A and stage could be forgotten and they could
therefore the latter was likely to persist. exhibit only slight to moderate persisting
This study was the first to provide direct or recurrent signs. During the chronic
evidence for zoonotic transmission bet- stage, lethargy, headache and muscle pain
ween dogs and men through detection of with progressive weight loss, loss of
the same Giardia genotype in people and appetite and malabsorption could be pre-
dogs (Traub et al., 2004). sent. The chronic infection in children
could be manifested with slowed growth
CLINICAL SIGNS (Burke, 1975; Craft, 1982). Urticaria
(Webster, 1958), cholecystitis (Soto &
Clinical symptoms of giardiasis include Dreiling, 1977) and pancreatitis (Kosyar-
acute or chronic diarrhoea, dehydration, ska, 1977) have been also reported in
abdominal pain and weight loss, that giardiasis. Rare symptoms may include
could be of various extent and could be arthritis (Shaw & Stevens, 1987), retinal
not manifested in infected individuals arteritis and iridocyclitis (Knox & King,
(Thompson et al., 1993; Rodriguez-Her- 1982) that resolve after specific anti-
nandez et al., 1996). Giardia treatment. According to experi-
The clinical manifestations of human enced investigators, the symptomatology
giardiasis are individual and depend on of giardiasis is complex and unpredic-
various factors such as the route of table, of individually variable and inter-
infection, the duration of infection and the mittent nature, characterized with inces-
physiological condition of the host, and santly changing symptoms (Jokipii &
probably, parasitic factors. The incubation Jokipii, 1983). Many of infection episodes
period lasts usually 915 days. The acute resolve after a diferent period of time and
stage generally begins with intestinal up to 13% of infected adults and 50% of
troubles, colics, followed by nausea and infected children remain symptomatic.
anorexia. Early signs could be low-degree The duration of asymptomatic shedding of
fever and lethargy. Later symptoms inclu- cysts is not known. The haemogramme of
de profuse, watery, foul-smelling diar- patients with giardiasis is usually normal
rhoea, meteorism and enhanced peristalsis and eosinophilia is rare. Fat, glucose, lac-
with extensive flatulence, eructation and tose, xylose, vitamin A and 12 malabsor-
bad taste, epigastric cramping. Rarely, ption have been established in some pa-
faeces could contain mucus or blood. The tients (Meyer & Radulesku, 1979; Gillon,
acute stage of the disease that lasts for 34 1985; Cordingley & Crawford, 1986).
days, is similar to that caused by other Cattle giardiasis is clinically and eco-
parasites and a tentative diagnosis of nomically important because of the occur-
giardiasis is rarely made. Most patients ring reduction of productivity (OHandley
have diarrhoea and the other symptoms et al., 2001; Olson et al., 2004). Giardia
are less frequently observed (Chakarova, are involved either solely or in combi-
2004). Although some acute episodes of nation with other intestinal pathogens in
giardiasis could resolve spontaneously, diarrhoea of calves (Xiao & Herd, 1994;
they usually pass into a subacute or Olson et al., 1995; OHandley et al.,
chronic stage (Lalova, 1977). his stage 1999; Huetink et al., 2001). Investigations
could be characterized with 2 or more have shown that co-infections by Giardia
years of intermittent diarrhoea. In people and Cryptosporidium in calves are very
returning from endemic area, the acute
72 BJVM, 13, No 2
A. I. Ivanov
frequent and are a major cause of diar- tion of identical or similar, but genetically
rhoea in animals older than 30 days of different Giardia is not possible (OHand-
age. Giardia only cause diarrhoea in adult ley, 2002). It is believed that PCR and
calves. Chronic giardiasis in calves result other molecular techniques have the best
in weight loss, lower feed conversion ratio sensitivity and specificity for Giardia dif-
and reduced slaughter weight. Identical ferentiation (McGlade et al., 2003).
results have been obtained with expe- Molecular techniques provide information
rimental infection of lambs (Olson et al., about the genotype of Giardia, by com-
1995). At the same time, other studies bination of PCR with restriction fragment
have reported no effect of giardiasis on length polymorphism analysis (Groth &
daily weight gain and feed conversion in Wetherall, 2000; Amar et al., 2002; Cac-
fattening beef calves, probably due to the cio et al., 2002). These procedures, apart
small number of animals used to establish being sensitive and specific, are also fast
the effect of the infection on productivity and easy to perform in a large set of
traits (Ralston et al., 2003). samples (Morgan, 2000).
Giardia infections in dogs and cats are PCR has the major advantage to allow
rarely manifested clinically. Clinical giar- easy interpretation of results. Neverthe-
diasis occurs mainly in connection with less, the very high sensitivity could be a
rearing conditions overpopulation, cau- problem as well. For example, microscopy
sing stress and aggravation of infection of samples from domestic cats showed
(Robertson et al., 2000). Infected dogs that 5% of them were infected with
and cats should be preferably treated be- Giardia, whereas by means of PCR, 80%
cause of their potential for zoonotic trans- of animals were determined as positive
mission. (McGlade et al., 2003). A survey among
The factors predetermining the clinical dogs in India has detected 3% infection
onset of giardiasis are individual host and rate by microscopy and 20% by PCR
environmental factors, as well as the para- (Traub et al., 2004). These results do not
sitic strain type. The elucidation of the take consideration about the irregular cyst
nature of these factors and host interac- shedding with faeces (McGlade et al.,
tions, resulting in clinical giardiasis, re- 2003) and raise concern for the epidemio-
quire future investigation. logical importance of infection of low
extent. The filtration, flocculation, flow
DIAGNOSIS cytometry, immunomagnetic separation
and monoclonal antibody immunofluo-
The detection of Giardia by conventional rescence are among the contemporary
microscopic methods such as ZnSO4 methods for detection of Giardia in tap
flotation and centrifugation (Zajac et al., water (Slifko et al., 2000). These techni-
2002) is still a primary parameter of ques are used for investigation of natural
infection. The detection of G. duodenalis or treated water sources. PCR methods are
by microscopy or ELISA of faeces is of more and more used in addition to immu-
limited epidemiological value, especially nofluorescence for water quality control.
when the source of infection has to be Molecular techniques could genotype
determined. Direct immunofluorescence parasites, isolated from water and deter-
microscopy has improved the sensitivity mine the source of the contamination
for detection and quantitation of cysts (Thompson, 2004).
shed, but the morphological differentia-
BJVM, 13, No 2 73
Giardia and giardiasis
74 BJVM, 13, No 2
A. I. Ivanov
BJVM, 13, No 2 75
Giardia and giardiasis
76 BJVM, 13, No 2
A. I. Ivanov
tors associated with beef cattle shedding Lalova, I. T., 1977. Investigation upon the epi-
pathogens of potential zoonotic concern. demiology and diagnostic of lambliasis
Epidemiology and Infection, 127, 147155. Dissertation. Sofia, Bulgaria (BG).
Hopkins, R. M., B. P. Meloni, D. M. Groth, J. Lambl, W., 1859. Mikroskopische untersu-
D. Wetherall, J. A. Reynoldson & R. C. A. chungen der darm-excrete. Vierteljahres-
Thompson, 1997. Ribosomal RNA sequ- schrift fr die praktische Heilkunde
encing reveals differences between the (Prag), 61, 158.
genotypes of Giardia isolates recovered Leclerc, H., L. Schwartzbrod & E. Dei-Cas,
from humans and dogs living in the same 2002. Microbial agents associated with
locality. The Journal of Parasitology, 83, waterborne diseases. Critical Reviews in
4451. Microbiology, 28, 371409.
Hopkins, R. M., C. C. Constantine, D. A. Levine, W. C., W. T. Stephenson & G. F.
Groth, J. D. Wetherall, J. A. Reynoldson & Craun, 1990. Waterborne disease out-
R. C. A. Thompson, 1999. DNA finger- breaks, 19861988. CDC Surveillance
printing of Giardia duodenalis isolates Summaries, 39, 113.
using the intergenic rDNA spacer.
Mayrhofer, G., R. H. Andrews, P. L. Ey & N.
Parasitology, 118, 531539.
B. Chilton, 1995. Division of Giardia
Hoque, M. E., V. T. Hope, T. Kjellstrom, R. isolates from humans into two genetically
Scragg & R. Lay-Yee, 2002. Risk of distinct assemblages by electrophoretic
giardiasis in Aucklanders: A case-control analysis of enzymes encoded at 27 loci and
study. International Journal of Infectious comparison with Giardia muris. Para-
Diseases, 6, 191. sitology, 111, 1117.
Jakubowski, W. & G. F. Graun, 2002. Update McGlade, T. R., L. D. Robertson, A. D. Elliott
on the control of Giardia in water & R. C. A. Thompson, 2003. High preva-
supplies. In: Giardia: The Cosmopolitan lence of Giardia detected in cats by PCR.
Parasite, eds Olson, B. E., M. E. Olson & Veterinary Parasitology, 110, 197205.
P. M. Wallis, CAB International, Walling-
ford, UK, pp. 217238. McRoberts, K. M., B. P. Meloni, U. M.
Morgan, R. Marano, N. Binz, S. L. Er-
Jarroll, E. L., A. K. Bingham & E. A. Meyer, landsen, S. A. Halse & R. C. A. Thomp-
1981. Effect of chlorine on Giardia son, 1996. Morphological and molecular
lamblia cyst viability. Applied Environ- characterisation of Giardia isolated from
mental Microbiology, 41, 483487. the straw-necked ibis (Threskiornis
Jokipii, L. & A. M. M. Jokipii, 1983. Trave- spinicollis) in Western Australia. The
ler's giardiasis. An analysis of clinical Journal of Parasitology, 82, 711718.
features. Travel and Traffic Medicine Meloni, B. P., A. J. Lymbery & R. C. A.
International, 1, 7580. Thompson, 1995. Genetic characterization
Kettlewell, J. S., S. S. Bettiol, N. Davies, T. of isolates of Giardia duodenalis by
Milstein & J. M. Goldsmidt, 1998. Epide- enzyme electrophoresis: Implications for
miology of giardiasis in Tasmania: A reproductive biology, population structure,
potential risk to residents and visitors. taxonomy, and epidemiology. Journal of
Journal of Travel Medicine, 5, 127130. Parasitology, 81, 368383.
Knox, D., & J. King, 1982. Retinal arteritis, Meloni, B. P., R. C. A. Thompson, R. M.
iridocyclitis, and giardiasis. Ophthalmo- Hopkins, J. A. Reynoldson & M. Gracey,
logy, 89, 13011308. 1993. The prevalence of Giardia and other
Kosyarska, J., 1977. Lambliasis as a cause of intestinal parasites in children, dogs and
acute pancreatitis. Wiadomoci Lekarskie cats from Aboriginal communities in the
(Warshaw, Poland: 1960), 30, 875877. west Kimberley region of Western Aust-
BJVM, 13, No 2 77
Giardia and giardiasis
ralia. The Medical Journal of Australia, Parasite, eds Olson, B. E., M. E. Olson &
158, 157159. P. M. Wallis, CAB International, Walling-
Meyer, E. A. & S. Radulescu, 1979. Giardia ford, UK, pp. 97105.
and giardiasis. Advances in Parasitology, O'Handley, R., C. Cockwill, T. A. McAllister,
17, 147. A. G. Buret, M. Jelinski & M. E. Olson,
Miteva, I., B. Chakarova & S. Stanilova. 2009. 1999. Duration of naturally acquired giar-
Genotyping of Giardia lamblia from diasis and cryptosporidiosis in dairy calves
human faeces in Bulgaria. In: Proceedings and their association with diarrhoea.
of the Eighth National Conference of Journal of the American Veterinary Medi-
Parasitology, 2326 September 2009, cal Association, 214, 391396.
Varna, Bulgaria, p. 30. O'Handley, R. M., M. E. Olson, D. Fraser, P.
Monis, P. T. & R. C. A. Thompson, 2003. Adams & R. C. A. Thompson, 2000. Pre-
Cryptosporidium and Giardia zoonoses: valence and genotypic characterisation of
Fact or fiction. Infection, Genetics and Giardia in dairy calves from Western
Evolution, 3, 233244. Australia and Western Canada. Veterinary
Parasitology, 90, 193200.
Monis, P. T., G. Mayrhofer & R. H. Andrews,
1996. Molecular genetic analysis of O'Handley, R. M., A. G. Buret, T. A.
Giardia intestinalis isolates at the gluta- McAllister, M. Jelinski & M. E. Olson,
mate dehydrogenase gene. Parasitology, 2001. Giardiasis in dairy calves: Effects of
112, 112. fenbendazole treatment on intestinal
structure and function. International
Monis, P. T., R. H. Andrews, G. Mayrhofer, Journal of Parasitology, 31, 7379.
G., J. Mackrill, J. Kulda, J. L. Isaac-Ren-
ton & P. L. Ey, 1998. Novel lineages of O'Handley, R. M., H. Ceri, C. Anette & M. E.
Giardia intestinalis identified by genetic Olson, 2003. Passive immunity and
analysis of organisms isolated from dogs serological immune response in dairy
in Australia. Parasitology, 116, 719. calves associated with natural Giardia
duodenalis infections. Veterinary Parasi-
Monis, P. T., R. H. Andrews, G. Mayrhofer & tology, 113, 8998.
P. L. Ey, 1999. Molecular systematics of
the parasitic protozoan Giardia intesti- Olson, M. E., T. A. McAllister & L.
nalis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, Deselliers, 1995. Effects of giardiasis on
16, 11351144. production in a domestic ruminant (lamb)
model. American Journal of Veterinary
Monzingo Jr., D. L. & C. P. Hibler, 1987. Research, 56, 14701474.
Prevalence of Giardia sp. in a beaver
colony and the resulting environmental Olson, M. E., H. Ceri & D. W. Morck, 2000.
contamination. Journal of Wildlife Disea- Giardia vaccination. Parasitology Today,
ses, 23, 576585. 16, 213217.
Moro, D., M. A. Lawson, R. P. Hobbs & R. C. Olson, M. E., R. O'Handley, B. Ralston & R.
A. Thompson, 2003. Pathogens of house C. A. Thompson, 2004. Emerging issues of
mice on arid Boullanger Island and Cryptosporidium and Giardia infections in
subantarctic Macquarie Island, Australia. cattle. Trends in Parasitology, 20, 185191.
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 39, 762771. Ralston, B. J., T. A. McAllister & M. E.
Morgan, U. M., 2000. Detection and charac- Olson, 2003. Prevalence and infection
terisation of parasites causing emerging pattern of naturally acquired giardiasis and
zoonoses. International Journal of Para- cryptosporidiosis in range beef calves and
sitology, 30, 14071421. their dams. Veterinary Parasitology, 114,
113122.
O'Handley, R. M., 2002. Giardia in farm
animals. In: Giardia: The Cosmopolitan Read, C., J. Walters, I. D. Robertson & R. C.
A. Thompson, 2001. Correlation between
78 BJVM, 13, No 2
A. I. Ivanov
BJVM, 13, No 2 79
Giardia and giardiasis
logical significance. Protozoological Abst- Van Keulen, H., D. E. Feely & P. T. Mace-
racts, 14, 128. chko, 1998. The sequence of Giardia
Thompson, R. C. A., J. A. Reynoldson & A. small subunit rRNA shows that voles and
H. W. Mendis, 1993. Giardia and giardia- muskrats are parasitized by a unique spe-
sis. Advances in Parasitology, 32, 71160. cies Giardia microti. Journal of Parasi-
tology, 84, 294300.
Thompson, R. C. A., A. J. Lymbery, D. A.
Pearce, K. C. Finn, J. A. Reynoldson & B. Webster, D. H., 1958. Human infection with
P. Meloni, 1996. Giardia duodenalis: Giardia lamblia. An analysis of 32 cases.
Exposure to metronidazole inhibits compe- Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 3, 6471.
titive interactions between isolates of the WHO, 1979. Parasitic Zoonoses. Report of a
parasite in vitro. The Journal of Parasi- WHO Expert Committee with the partici-
tology, 82, 679683. pation of FAO. Technical Report Series
Thompson, R. C. A., U. M. Morgan, K. J. 637. World Health Organization, Geneva.
Mellor & R. M. Hopkins, 1999. Genoty- WHO, 1996. The World Health Report 1996.
ping Giardia and Cryptosporidium. To- Fighting Disease Fostering Development.
day's Life Science, 11, 8086. World Health Organization, Geneva.
Thompson, R. C. A., R. M. Hopkins & W. L. Xiao, L., 1994. Giardia infection in farm ani-
Homan, 2000. Nomenclature and genetic mals. Parasitology Today, 10, 436438.
groupings of Giardia infecting mammals. Xiao, L. & R. P. Herd, 1994. Infection pattern
Parasitology Today, 16, 210213. of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in calves.
Thurman, R., B. Faulkner & D. Veal, 1998. Veterinary Parasitology, 55, 257262.
Water quality in rural Australia. Journal of Xiao, L., K. Saeed & R. P. Herd, 1996. Effi-
Applied Microbiology, 84, 627632. cacy of albendazole and fenbendazole
Thurston-Enriquez, J. A., P. Watt, S. E. Dowd, against Giardia infection in cattle. Veteri-
R. Enriquez, I. L. Pepper & C. P. Gerba, nary Parasitology, 61, 165.
2002. Detection of protozoan parasites and Zajac, A. M., T. P. LaBranche, A. R. Dono-
microsporidia in irrigation waters used for ghue & T. C. Chu, 1998. Efficacy of fen-
crop production. Journal of Food bendazole in the treatment of experimental
Protection, 65, 378382. Giardia infection in dogs. American Jour-
Traub, R. J., I. D. Robertson, P. Irwin, N. nal of Veterinary Research, 59, 6163.
Mencke, & R. C. A. Thompson, 2002. The Zajac, A. M., J. Johnson & S. E. King, 2002.
role of dogs in transmission of gastro- Evaluation of the importance of centrifu-
intestinal parasites in a remote tea-growing gation as a component of zinc sulfate fecal
community in northeast India. American flotation examinations. Journal of American
Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygi- Animal Hospital Association, 38, 221224.
ene, 67, 539545.
Traub, R. J., P. Monis, I. Robertson, P. Irwin,
N. Mencke & R. C. A. Thompson, 2004. Paper received 13.01.2010; accepted for
Epidemiological and molecular evidence publication 31.05.2010
supports the zoonotic transmission of
Giardia among humans and dogs living in
Correspondence:
the same community. Parasitology, 128,
253262. Assoc. Prof. Andrey Ivanov
Trout, J. M., M. Santini & R. Fayer, 2003. Department of Veterinary Microbiology,
Identification of Assemblage A Giardia in Infectious and Parasitic Diseases,
white-tailed deer. The Journal of Parasi- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,
tology, 89, 12541255. 6000 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
e-mail: andrey1958@abv.bg
80 BJVM, 13, No 2