LTE Huawei PDF

Security Level:
LTE for Claro
www.huawei.com
Jan Berglund
Wireless Marketing Director
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

Contents
Spectrum usage for Claro
LTE in a SRAN perspective
Interworking
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 2

Proposed Claro spectrum layout
LTE Capacity Layer LTE Data Overlay
AWS B4: 20MHz Urban LTE Capacity LTE AWS
LTE
APT700 : X MHz LTE Coverage APT700
Smartphone
Capacity
Legacy voice capacity layer and new data capacity
1900MHz: 17.5MHz GSM -> 5+5U + 7.5G G1900 GU1900
Smartphone
Coverage
3G Coverage Layer
850MHz: 5 +5 MHz UMTS U850 Voice Capacity
Indoor coverage layer

850MHz: 2.5MHz GSM G850 Voice Coverage
2013 2014 2015 2015
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 3Page 3

Contents
Interworking

SingleRAN Broad Hardware Pipe
Solution

BBU RF Cabinet Controller
SingleBBU and CloudBB Evolution
Before SRAN8.0 Near Future SRAN8.0 Coming Near Future
Separated Concurrent Concurrent
BBU Stack BBU Pooling Cloud BB
MPT MPT BBP
Centralized Pool for capacity Open API
maintenance gain and sharing
General Hardware
30%+ capacity improving
CloudBB 30%+ OPEX saving
UBBP(GUL)
QOE enhancing
UMPT(GUL)
WBBP LBBP
UMPT( GUL)
WBBP LBBP
GTMU UMPT( U) UMPT( L)
SingleBBU, not Just Co-BBU Evolve to CloudBB Step by Step

5B3M in One BBU BBU Capability Double Every Year
From MPT Concurrent to BBP Concurrent BBU Architecture Evolution Matching BBU Growth

SingleBBU Architecture from SRAN8.0
SRAN 6.0/SRAN7.0 SRAN8.0
SingleRAN SingleRAN SingleRAN SingleOM

in OSS in OSS
G U L GUL
Separate
OAM Single OAM
interface interface
G U L GUL
WMPT LMPT
Dedicated UMPT
HW for each Common
RAT HW for
GTMU WBBP LBBP GBBP WBBP LBBP each RAT
UMPT GUL Concurrent , Making Separated G/U/L OM to SingleOM

SingleRAN Common BBU Benifits Single Operation
From One Team to One Knowledge 6
Common Hardware test instance
4 -80%
2
GSM UMTS LTE
0
UMTS LTE GSM SingleRAN(With
SingleOM)
Common part (iRAT part) Common part (Single RAT) RAT related
Common Hardware 1
MML Commands (x1000)
0.8
-40%
SingleRAN 3 brains(~2013)
0.6
0.4
0.2
GSM UMTS LTE
0
NodeB eNodeB GBTS SingleRAN( with
SingleOM)
4 Integration Parameters (x1000)
Common Hardware 3 -40%
2
SingleRAN 1 brain (2013~) 1
0
NodeB eNodeB GBTS SingleRAN(with
SingleOM)
UMPT Evolution and Specification
UMPT Evolution UMPT Specification & Capacity
4E1/T1
2FE/GE
GUL Concurrent
Same Hardware Dynamically
for UMTS and LTE Signaling Sharing
In-house Chipset
Hardware Ready for
GUL Concurrent
Before Now
evolution
G: 60 TRX(IP) G: 72 TRX; U: 1500 CNBAPs
U: 170 CNBAP/s L: 120 CAPs
L: 30 CAPs GUL(Typical Concurrent ):

SRAN7.0 SRAN8.0 18 TRX+1000CNBAPS+30CAPS

Blade RRU, Designed for Multi-band and Multi-RAT Scalability
Scenario 1: Scenario 2: Scenario 3:

Band X Band X + Y Band X + Y + Z
Sector 1 Or Sector 1 + 2 Or Sector 1 + 2 + 3
Blade RRU
Unique Seamless Assembly Smallest & Fastest Best-in-class RF Performance

One Box 12L/14KG Up to10W/L Power Density
Multi-band, Multi-RAT and Industrys most lightweight Up to 60MHz IBW
Multi-sector Scalability macro RRU, three modules 30% Less Power Consumption
installed under 5 minutes

Software Defined Equipment
Blade RRU Flexible Installation

Blade RRU Clean Site 36L
6 Boxes 2 Boxes
66% Box saved per site One Chip for

50% Workload saved for cable Dielectric duplexer
All Digital Functions
50% Wind resistance reduction
50% Decrease 30%

Highest Power Efficiency Power Consumption
12 Cables 4 Cables
Blade RRU Flexible Expansion
24L 36L Super Slim Fin

12L Chimney channel
Die-Casting for ultra Fresh Air
Band X + Y Band X + Y + Z high efficiency heat sink Compensation
or or
Sector 1 + 2
or
Sector 1 + 2 + 3 12L/14KG ONE
4 x 4 MIMO Industry Highest Integration Box Assembly

Software Defined Equipment
Best-in-class RF Performance
PA Efficiency
370W 320W
50% 13.5%
45%
DPD+A DHT/
40% Y-Power
DPD+A DHT 10% PA efficiency
DPD+Doherty
Improved, 13.5%
Blade RRU Power saved
Instantaneous Bandwidth Power Density

60M 10W/L
Blade RRU
5W/L Blade RRU
25M
IBW Up to 60M full Up to 10W/L ,

bandwidth, One RRU Power integration
support RAN Sharing doubled
RRU3838 260W@24L 260W@12L

Blade RRU Portfolio
2012 2013
3268
2T2R
3260
2.6G 2x40W
2T4R
Blade RRU (2.1G) available for
2x40W rollout in Q3, 2012
3832 Blade RRU portfolio will cover

2T4R
AWS 2x60W
all mainstream bands by 2013
3824 3838
1T2R
3826 2T2R
3832
2.1G
1x60W
1T2R 2x40W
2T4R More bands will be supported
1x80W 2x60W
by Blade RRU according the
900M/ 3936 3938
1T2R 2T2R market needs beyond 2013
1800M 1x80W 2x40W
3268
2T2R
APT700 2x40W
2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2013 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 Note: 850/1900 under planning

Uplink 4Rx achieve 60% capacity gain
60%
UL 4-Antenna Receive Diversity
Increase
With 4 antennas per 2Rx
sector for receiving 4Rx
Cell Average Throughput
2Rx -> 4Rx In operator X Commercial trial network,2012

Uplink Shared Channel IRC
Shared Channel IRC vs. MRC
PUSCH IRC
Scenario: Urban area, small ISD (Inter Site Distance) sites
2.4~3.7dB gain in 2Rx
UEs Interfering on PUSCH
Parameter Assumption
Cellular Layout Hex grid, 19 cell sites, 3 cells per site
Distance Dependant path-loss L = I + 37.6log10R

(R in km)
I = 128.1 2GHz
Lognormal Shadowing Similar to UMTS 30.03, B1.4.1.4
Shadowing Standard Deviation 8dB
Correlation distance of Shadowing 50m
Shadowing Correlation Between cells 0.5

Victim cell Interfering cell Between sectors 1.0
Antenna pattern (Horizontal) 2

3-sector cell sites with fixed antenna pattern A min 12 , Am

1dB
1dB 70 deg, Am 20dB
Channel Model SCME
Total BS TX power (Ptotal) 43 dBm 1.25 / 5MHz carrier

46dBm - 10MHz carrier
Antenna configuration 2 or 4 for Rx, 1, 2 or 4 for Tx

4Tx: x-pol, 0.5
4Rx: x-pol, 0.5
5dB noise figure
Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) IRC 14dBi BS antenna gain plus cable loss
UE power class 24dBm (250mW)
9.55% increase UL Cell average Throughput (1X2 UE Antennas 2 or 4 Rx antennas, 1 Tx antenna

0dBi antenna gain
9dB noise figure
MMSE-IRC compared with MMSE-MRC ) Inter-Cell Interference modelling Modelling the strongest interfering sectors (B=8 sectors for DL, B=10
users for UL) as spatially correlated processes whose covariance is
Support of adaptive switch between MRC and IRC determined by their channel matrices
Model the remaining sectors as AWGN interferences
Minimum distance between UE and cell 35m
Thermal noise spectral density -174dBm/Hz

Users dropped evenly across the cell
Uplink Control Channel IRC
Control Channel IRC vs. MRC
Scenario: Urban area small ISD (Inter Site Distance) sites
UEs Interfering on PRACH and PUCCH PUCCH IRC

Format1x 1dB gain in 2Rx
Format2x 0.5dB gain in 2Rx
Format1x 2dB gain in 4Rx
Format2x 0.7dB gain in 4Rx
PRACH IRC
4~4.8dB gain in 2Rx
Victim cell Interfering cell
Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH/PRACH) IRC

20-40% increase in UL control channel coverage
Improve network access success rate
Support of adaptive switch between MRC and IRC

LTE Feature
No-Edge of UL Intra-eNodeB CoMP: Improve 10% Cell Edge UL Throughput
UL CoMP w/t Co-demodulation & Interference Benefits*

Rejection
No CoMP
Without CoMP
Throughput (Mbps)
7% Increase With CoMP
Intra-eNB CoMP 10% Increase
Intra-eNB CoMP Legend Cell Average Cell Edge

Throughput. Throughput
Gain for UE1: Co-demodulated.
Gain for UE2: Interference (UE1) Rejection. * Simulation assumption: 10MHz, 2-Sector CoMP
UL Intra-eNB, Improve User throughput with software upgrade only

LTE Feature
Carrier Aggregation(CA)
2.6G CC1 Scenario:
Intra-band CA (2CC) : 2.6G, 1.8G
Inter-band CA(2CC): 2.6G+1.8G, 2.6G+800M,
LTE-A UE 1.8G+800M, 700M+AWS
LTE-A UE 800M CC1
2.6G CC2 2.6G CC2 Up to 40MHz total bandwidth
Benefit:
Up to 300Mbps per UE CAT6 (DL 300 / UL
Intra-band CA Inter-band CA
50Mbps @ 2x2 MIMO)
Fast load balance between the two LTE
carriers
up to 300Mbps@2*2MIMO Dependency:
CC2
R10 UE need to support CA.
Require LBBPc/LBBPd + LBBPd to support
2CC
LTE-A UE Intra-band CA requires that the time deviation
between the RF channels of different CC less
than 130 ns.
CC1
LTE UE

Contents
Interworking

Interworking Solution
Interworking Strategy Interworking Detail Features
RAT Priority Definition Standard Interworking Function

Camping Strategy Camping
Handover Strategy Customized Priority Definition based
on SPID
Connected Mobility
Handover Process
CSFB

GUL Interworking Priority Strategy Claro Peru
Coverage based HO
MLB based HO
High 4 LTE 2100 (20Mx2)
3 UMTS 1900
2 UMTS 850
GU same as before
Low
0/1 GSM 850/1900
Priority Order
Camping Strategy When Idle Strategy When Connected

Load balancing between LTE AWS and 700
Better spectral efficiency (LTE - UMTS - GSM ),
higher priority Load balancing between LTE and UMTS
Higher frequency point, Higher priority

Idle Mobile Distribution Strategy
Cell
Priority Suggested strategies,
UE System Priority
Individual
To better serve 4G-preferred UE
Priority Coverage
and offload traffic from 3G
Coverage (Better Cell)
To let UE stay in the service area
UE Individual Priority based on SPID
To provide better service
LTE FDD FDD/GSM/UMTS FDD/GSM/UMTS FDD/GSM/UMTS experience for subscriber.
Multi Mode UE UL sensitive UE Multi Mode UE
GSM/UMTS LTE/GSM/UMTS Multi Mode UE

GSM/UMTS Handset Voice centric
Out of LTE coverage
Multi Mode UE
eNodeB/BTS

Handover categories
Load balance
Coverage
Based on the radio link quality Based on the RB utilization
UL Quality Service

X
Based on UL Quality Based on the service

Distance
Coverage based is recommended by default at initial stage
Load based is useful when LTE traffic significantly increased
Service based is for better utilization of each radio technologies
Distance and UL quality is to manage sub optimal cases Based on the distance
Flexible Mobility Strategy Satisfies Different Scenarios

Interworking Solution
Interworking Strategy Interworking Detail Features
RAT Priority Definition Standard Interworking Function

Camping Strategy Camping
Handover Strategy Customized Priority Definition based
on SPID
Connected Mobility
Handover Process
CSFB

LTE TDD/FDD/GSM/UMTS Interworking Standard Function
Cell Selection
RRC_IDLE
Cell Reselection
PS HO
CCO/NACC
Data Service Continuity
Redirection
RRC_CONNECTED
CS FallBack
Voice Service Continuity SRVCC
Dual Radio UE
Huawei Support All feature of Interworking

UE Switch ON PLMN/Cell Initial Selection
PLMN Select When UE Switch On
Stored in UE Last RPLMN
HPLMN or EHPLMN select

HPLMN & EHPLMN
Set in SIM
User Controlled PLMN Selector

Set in UE with Access Technology The Timer of HPLMN
Reselection is Saved in SIM
Card (no less 6 min)
Operator Controlled PLMN Selector
Set in SIM with Access Technology
Suggested PLMN List in SIM card: The PLMN of Better Wireless Quality
PLMN + E-UTRAN
PLMN + UTRAN
PLMN + GSM
Other PLMN Base On Wireless Quality
Customized PLMN/Frequency List in SIM card, UE Prefers to Camp on LTE Network

Camping Reselection to Higher Priority Cell
GSM, UMTS, FDD cells
broadcast same priority list
in SIB
LTE FDD (Higher) UE reads SIB and get

SI neighbor list, priority, and
B cell reselection parameters
GSM/UMTS (Low)
SI
UE measures signal
B
strength of higher priority
neighbor cells
Suggested RAT Priority:
LTE FDD (Higher)
GSM/UMTS (Low)
Reselection happens when
RF condition is fulfilled. UE
camps on LTE FDD

LBFD-00201803 Cell Selection and Rese
Idle Mobility Reselection to Better Cell

Cell Reselection Principal
FDD 1800 S-eNB is worse than Thresh_serving.low & T-BTS is

better than Thresh_x.low
Cell Reselection
FDD 800 High Prio. Low Prio.
T-eNB is better than Thresh_x.high
eNodeB eNodeB/BTS
UMTS/GSM
Low Prio. -> High Prio.

Happens when UE enters
Higher Priority Cell
High Prio. -> Low Prio.
Happens when UE moves
out of Higher Priority Cell
UEs camp on Cell which

providing best service
Cell Reselection From High -> Low Cell Reselection From Low > High

LOFD-00105401 Camp & Handover Based on
Customized: UE Individual Priority based on SPID

S6a
SPID) HSS: Set User SPID info & tell eNodeB via
MME
HSS MME eNodeB send UE Individual priority
Data centric UE: eNB not send individual
in RRCConnectionRelease based
Subscriber S1-MME priority to UE, common priority in SIB
Profile ID SPID) on SPID works, then UE prefer camping on LTE TDD
Voice centric UE: eNB send UE individual
Cell reselection
Info
priority message which gives GSM higher
Cell reselection
Info FDD Priority 5 priority than LTE, then individual cell
GSM Priority 5 TDD Priority 4 reselection priority overwrite common
eNodeB Cell reselection
UMTS Priority 4 UMTS Priority 3 Info priority, UE prefer camping on GSM
GSM Priority 2 TDD Priority 5
TDD Priority 3
FDD Priority 4
UL sensitive UE: eNB send UE individual
FDD Priority 2
UMTS Priority 3
priority message which gives LTE FDD
GSM Priority 2
higher priority than LTE TDD, then
individual cell reselection priority will
overwrite common priority and UE prefers
Voice centric dual-Mode UE UL sensitive UE Data centric dual-Mode UE camping on LTE FDD
Voice Centric UE Prefers GSM/UMTS & Data Centric UE Prefers LTE TDD/FDD

LOFD-001019 PS Inter-RAT Mobility between E-UTRAN and
Connected Mobility Scheme: LOFD-001020 PS Inter-RAT Mobility between E-UTRAN and
Redirection/PS Handover/CCO/NACC
To GSM To UMTS:
PS HO > CCO/NACC > Redirection PS HO > Redirection
eNodeB
GSM UMTS
LTE FDD
Proper Interworking Policy is Chosen based on UE Capability

LBFD-00201801 Coverage Based Intra-frequency Handover
LBFD-00201802 Coverage Based Inter-frequency Handover
Coverage-based Handover LOFD-001019 PS Inter-RAT Mobility between E-UTRAN and

WRFD-020126 Mobility Between UMTS and LTE
Moves to neighbor
LTE FDD cell Threshold of trigger Inter-
freq HO (IF A2) is higher
Moves out of LTE
than threshold of trigger
coverage
LTE FDD LTE FDD Inter-RAT HO (IR A2),
AWS 700 which means that inter-

freq HO is triggered earlier
Inter-RAT than inter-RAT HO.
Inter-Frequency
UMTS
If UE under UMTS move to LTE coverage, there are two options:

Moves to LTE 1. Service is still provided by UMTS. When service ends, UE will
coverage camp on LTE network by cell reselection
2. UMTS triggers Inter-RAT handover to LTE
Using different event threshold to decide handover target

Handover Priority: Intra-frequency > inter-frequency , Intra-RAT > inter-RAT

LOFD-001032 Intra-LTE Load Balancing
LOFD-001044 Inter-RAT Load Sharing to UTRAN
Load Balancing based Handover LOFD-001045 Inter-RAT Load Sharing to GERAN

WRFD-020306 Inter-RAT Handover Based on Load
WRFD-070004 Load Based GSM and UMTS Handover Enhancement
Based on Iur-g
WRFD-070006 GSM and UMTS Load Balancing Based on Iur-g
Huawei provide the seamless
synergy among multiple layer of High
the network Trigger redirection
directly
Trigger inter-RAT HO
Offload within FDD Trigger inter-freq HO

(intra-freq HO)
Trigger intra-freq HO
LTE FDD AWS According to cell load

(PRB utilization ratio)
Offload between FDD/UMTS Exchange load info via Low

(inter-RAT HO) RIM Procedure Load
UMTS 850/1900
Load balance is optimal when traffic significantly
increasing
Offload between UMTS/GSM Steering the newly-access subscriber to low-load network.
Iur-g
(inter-RAT HO) Leverage the load among LTE/UMTS network. Make full use
of LTE/UMTS network resource.
GSM 850/1900

LBFD-00201802 Coverage Based Inter-frequency Ha
UL Quality based Handover
Scenario: DL quality is good, but

UL quality is limited, which result
to poor service experience

X
Principle: When UL IBLER is
higher than threshold, trigger
handover to a better neighbor cell
HO
Improve Edge User Experience in Interference or UL-Limited Scenario

Win Together

LTE Huawei PDF

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

LTE Huawei PDF

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Security Level:

LTE for Claro

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

Spectrum usage for Claro

LTE in a SRAN perspective

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 2

Indoor coverage layer

2013 2014 2015 2015

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 3Page 3

Spectrum usage for Claro

LTE in a SRAN perspective

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 4

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 5

SingleBBU, not Just Co-BBU Evolve to CloudBB Step by Step

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 6

SingleRAN SingleRAN SingleRAN SingleOM

UMPT GUL Concurrent , Making Separated G/U/L OM to SingleOM

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 7

SingleRAN 1 brain (2013~) 1

L: 30 CAPs GUL(Typical Concurrent ):

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 9

Blade RRU, Designed for Multi-band and Multi-RAT Scalability

Scenario 1: Scenario 2: Scenario 3:

Unique Seamless Assembly Smallest & Fastest Best-in-class RF Performance

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 10

Blade RRU Flexible Installation

66% Box saved per site One Chip for

50% Decrease 30%

Blade RRU Flexible Expansion

24L 36L Super Slim Fin

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 11

Instantaneous Bandwidth Power Density

IBW Up to 60M full Up to 10W/L ,

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 12

3832 Blade RRU portfolio will cover

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 13

Uplink 4Rx achieve 60% capacity gain

Cell Average Throughput

2Rx -> 4Rx In operator X Commercial trial network,2012

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 14

Cellular Layout Hex grid, 19 cell sites, 3 cells per site

Distance Dependant path-loss L = I + 37.6log10R

Lognormal Shadowing Similar to UMTS 30.03, B1.4.1.4

Shadowing Standard Deviation 8dB

Correlation distance of Shadowing 50m

Shadowing Correlation Between cells 0.5

Antenna pattern (Horizontal) 2

Total BS TX power (Ptotal) 43 dBm 1.25 / 5MHz carrier

Antenna configuration 2 or 4 for Rx, 1, 2 or 4 for Tx

UE power class 24dBm (250mW)

9.55% increase UL Cell average Throughput (1X2 UE Antennas 2 or 4 Rx antennas, 1 Tx antenna

Minimum distance between UE and cell 35m

Thermal noise spectral density -174dBm/Hz

UEs Interfering on PRACH and PUCCH PUCCH IRC

Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH/PRACH) IRC

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 16

No-Edge of UL Intra-eNodeB CoMP: Improve 10% Cell Edge UL Throughput

UL CoMP w/t Co-demodulation & Interference Benefits*

Intra-eNB CoMP 10% Increase

Intra-eNB CoMP Legend Cell Average Cell Edge

UL Intra-eNB, Improve User throughput with software upgrade only

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 17

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 18