Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
97 www.ijeas.org
The flow with unstable electroconductivity of an MHD fluid over a suddenly accelerated plate A study
(3.3) (3.4)
u 0, j R, 0, j
, 0, j forall j
u i, j 0, i, j 0, i, j 0 forall j
98 www.ijeas.org
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS)
ISSN: 2394-3661, Volume-3, Issue-4, April 2016
The computations are carried out for different values 2.00
' u
Gr = 5,Gc = 7
2 (5.1) 1.00
u0 y y0 U
0.75
0.50
1
Nu (5.2) 0.25
0,t y y0 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Y
Fig.4 Variation in Velocity Profiles for different Gr & Gc
Sh (5.3)
y y0
2.00
2.25
1.50
2.00 1.25
1.75
1.00
1.50 M =5 U
M 10 0.75
1.25 M = 15
M = 20 0.50
1.00
U
0.25
0.75
0.50 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.25 Y
0.00 Fig. 5 Variation in Velocity Profiles for different
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Y
Fig.1 Velocity profiles for different M
1.2
2.00
1.0
1.75
Pr=0.31
Pr = 0.51
K=1
1.50 K=7
Pr = 0.71
0.8
1/K = 0 Pr = 1
1.25
0.6
1.00
U
0.75 0.4
0.50
0.2
0.25
0.00 0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Y Y
Fig.2 Variation in Velocity profiles for different K Fig.6 Variation in Temperature profiles for different Pr
99 www.ijeas.org
The flow with unstable electroconductivity of an MHD fluid over a suddenly accelerated plate A study
1.1 1.0
1.0 0.9
1.0
1.1
0.9
1.0
R = 1.5
R = 3.5 0.8
0.9
R = 5.5 Sc = 0.66
0.8 0.7
R = 7.5 Sc = 2.01
0.7 0.6 Sc = 2.66
0.6
0.5
0.5 0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0 0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Y Y
Fig.8 Variation in temperature profiles for different R Fig.12 Variation in concentration profiles for different Sc
1.4 1.0
0.9
1.2 Q = 1 0.8
Q = 3 Kr = 1.63
Q = 5 0.7 Kr = 2.63
1.0 Kr= 3.63
Q = 7
0.6 Kr = 4.63
0.8 0.5
0.6 0.4
0.3
0.4 0.2
0.1
0.2
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.0
Y
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Fig.13 Variation concentration profiles for different Kr
Y
Fig.9 Variation in temperature profiles for different Q
1.0
0.9
0.5 0.3
0.4 0.2
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.0 Y
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Fig.14 Variation in concebtration profiles for different Ec
Y
Fig.10 Variation in temperature profiles for different Re
100 www.ijeas.org
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS)
ISSN: 2394-3661, Volume-3, Issue-4, April 2016
The effects of viscosity and thermophoresis on a suddenly
1.0
accelerated plate with variable approximated
0.9 electronegativity with MHD fluid influenced by chemical
0.8
R = 1.5 reaction and radiation is considered. To simulate thermal
R = 3.5
0.7 R = 5.5 radiation effects, the Rosseland diffusion flux model is used.
R = 7.5
0.6
The Governing equations are solved using the Finite
difference method. The results are discussed through graphs
0.5
and the conclusions are
0.4
The velocity increases with the magnetic field (M),
0.3
permeability (K), and the low inertial force (Re).
The thermal buoyancy and Solutal buoyancy also
0.2
0.1
increases the velocity.
As a result of sudden movement of the plate, the
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Y
Fig.15 Variation in concentration profiles for different R decrease in electronegativity,results in the increase
of velocity.
The thermal distribution increases with the increase of
The graphs for the velocity profiles are shown from 1 to 5. Pr, Re, and viscosity.
From the fig.1, it is evident that as the magnetic field (M)
increases the velocity decreases which can also be seen from With the increase of radiation and large amounts of
the case of A. T. Ngianga [11]. The variation of velocity with heat absorption, the temperature increases.
the porosity parameter (K) and the low inertial force (Re) is With the increase of Sr and Sc, and with the rise in the
showed in figures 2 and 3. Raise in the velocity is observed chemical reaction the concentration distribution of
with the increase of the porosity parameter and the low the fluid decreases
inertial force(Re). This effect is observed by A. T. Ngianga
With increase of viscosity a sharp decrease is
[11] also. The velocity of the fluid increases with the thermal
buoyancy (Gr) and Solutal Grashoff number (Gc) which is observed.
shown in the comparative figure 4. Figure 5 shows the With increase of radiation the concentration of the
increase of velocity profile of the fluid with the decrease in fluid is increased but it decreases in the boundary
electronegativity and is consistent with the studies of A. T. layer sharply
Ngianga [11].
In the figures through 6 to 10, the variation of temperature REFERENCES
with various physical parameters is shown and the analysis of [1] W. F Hughes and J. A. Brighton, Fluid Dynamics (Third edition).
temperature distribution is carried out.In figure 6 the variation (Schaums Outlines, McGraw-Hill, New York) Ch 11.P 275 (1999).
[2] H Pattayanak and R Mohapatra. Dufour and radiation effect on MHD
of Prandtl number for the temperature distribution is given. boundary layer flow past a wedge through porous medium with heat
For small values of Prandtl number, the thermal diffusivity source and chemical reaction, Jour. of Advan. In Math, 11(4): 5094,
dominates i.e. the temperature increases with the increase of (2015).
Prandtl number. The increase of temperature distribution is [3] M. A. Orukari, A. T Ngiangia and F Life-George.Influence of viscous
dissipation and radiation on MHD Couette flow in a porous Medium, J
shown for the variation in Eckert number in figure 7. In
of NAMP, 18: 201 (2011)
figures 8 and 9 variations of radiation and heat absorption are [4] A.T Ngiangia, The effects of permeability and radiation on the stability
shown. The temperature decreases with the increase of of plane Couette-Poiseuille flow in a porous medium,J of NAMP, 11:
Radiation, but with large amounts of heat absorption it 87-94 (2007)
increases. It is shown in the figure 10 that temperature [5] Z Boricic, D Nikodijevic, D Milenkovic and Z Stamenkovic. A form of
MHD universal equations of unsteady incompressible fluid flow with
increases with the Reynolds number. variable electroconductivity on heated moving plate, Theoret. Appl.
From the figures through 11 to 16, the variation of Mech. 32(1): 65 (2005)
concentration of the fluid is shown. In the figures 11 and 12,
variations of Soret and Schmidt numbers are shown for the [6] A.T Ngiangia, O Amadi and M.AOrukari.Cont, Jour. of Renewable
Energy, 2(1): 19 (2011).
concentration of the fluid. It is observed that with the increase [7] P Mebine J of NAMP. 3 (2): 191 (2007)
of Soret and Schmidt numbers, the concentration of the fluid [8] C Israel-Cookey, AOgulu and V. B Omubo-Pepple. Influence of
decreases in the boundary layer gradually for Soret number viscous dissipation and radiation on unsteady MHD free-convection
but for Schmidt number it reduces rapidly. For the increase flow past an infinite heated vertical plate in a porous medium with time-
dependent suction, Int. Jour. of Heat and Mass Trans. 46: 2305 -
with the chemical reaction, the concentration distribution of 2311 (2003).
the fluid decreases. This is shown in the figure 13.With the [9] G. Bodosa and A. K Borkakati.MHD Couette flow with heat transfer
increase of viscosity i. e. the Eckert number (Ec), the mass between two horizontal plates in the presence of a uniform transverse
transfer decreases. For the high viscosity i.e. large value of magnetic field, Theoret.Appl. Mech. 30(1): 1 9(2003)
[10] A.T Ngiangia and M.AOrukari.MHD Couette-Poiseuille Flow in a
Ec, i.e. Ec = 0.7, the decrease in the boundary layer is sharp. Porous Medium,Global J of Pure and Applied Maths. 9(2): 169 (2013)
This can be observed from the fig.14.As the radiation [11] Alalibo T. Ngiangia, Flow of viscous incompressible MHD fluid over a
convection parameter (R) increases the concentration of the suddenly accelerated plate with variable electroconductivity and
fluid increases. This effect is shown in the fig.15. chemical reaction provoked by radiation, World Scientific News 34
(2016) 135-145 (2016)
7. CONCLUSIONS
101 www.ijeas.org