Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Hi Donna,
Doesnt it feel good when you can get stuff off your plate and onto someone elses!!
Regards,
Charles
Charles F. Myers
FDA/CDRH/OIR/DRH
Phone: 301-796-5619
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda hhs.gov
From: Engleman, Donna
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 10:52 AM
To: Myers, Charles F
Cc: OC Medical Device Complaints and Responses
Subject: FW: information about GE Healthcare
Hello Charles,
As always, going through some older stuff. Is this one that James Woods may have sent to your
group by any chance? Please let me know if you have this complaint and/or accept it.
Thanks!!
Donna
Thanks and Ill wait to hear back from James before processing this complaint further in OC.
Donna
http://www.volusonclub.com/emea/insite
Donna,
James ccing you in case these devices are OIR regulated. Thanks
-- Steve
Steve Silverman
Director, Office of Compliance
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
(301) 796-5500
Our mission is to protect and promote public health by evaluating, enhancing, and
ensuring compliance with medical device laws, resulting in the availability of high-quality
medical devices.
Our vision is to take actions that enable maximum device safety and effectiveness.
Respected Steven,
I am a lead engineer by profession. Background in electronics & communications engg, India. I have
masters degree in computer science from Cleveland state and post graduate management-economics
from India & system design from MIT(I haven't completed MIT course). I haveextensive work
experience for designing and developing products and services for over 8 years now. I have worked on
Genome sequencing InVitro as well.
My point was::Fixing defects are very early stage, doing proper design at the beginning/early stage is
better, because doing the same LATER ON..cost, time, efforts increase exponentially higher and puts
lots of consequences andrippleeffects on the team, company, customers and stake holders.
Ph: 4843629716-----------------------------------------------------------------
There were issues with product quality itself.ProductInsite Excwas aging and dying with
almost disaster level situation (60000 medical devices communicate to this product/system.
)There were 2000-600 Defects in connectivity platform in production and some were
unresolved for almost ten years. I found out security issues /HIPPA issues.
Insite Exc(Insite Express Connect)product does not have a proper logging/audit trail/reporting available in
production environment. I confirmed it with Mike Walls.
HIPPA 164.312(b) Technical safeguards Standard: Audit controlsAudit controls refer to the capability to
record and examine system activity.
And it's replacement project RSVP with GE intelligent platforms; failed after two years.The
previous connectivity model Insite Exc have performance and maintainability , quality,
security issues. This new connectivity model for the connectivity platformsby
retaining the existing agents at device side while upgrading the back office
infrastructure.
When it occurred that "why we are still shipping defective InsiteExc product ; David Mehring manager replied
during a group meeting that "Connectivity isbetterthan InsiteExc product" (means at least medical device will
have connectivity).
Customers have complained several times asInsiteExc productwas not working and unavailable for
more than 23 times in a year.
Note to Trevor:
Please include this URL in the complaint.
http://www.volusonclub.com/emea/insite
Yes that is correct. We need to enter this and follow up with Charles to see if they will accept it.
If he accepts it, and he should, we will close it out referred to another center and place OIR at the
beginning of the naming convention.
Donna
From: OC Medical Device Complaints and Responses
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 2:26 PM
To: Engleman, Donna
Subject: RE: OIR-GE Healthcare
(b) (5)
From: Engleman, Donna
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 12:08 PM
To: OC Medical Device Complaints and Responses
Subject: RE: OIR-GE Healthcare
Do you see that in CARS? I ask as below I see where a complaint needed to be created and I dont
know if it has.
Does that help?
Donna
From: OC Medical Device Complaints and Responses
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 11:56 AM
To: Engleman, Donna
Subject: FW: OIR-GE Healthcare
Hi Donna.
I feel like Im suffering from brain freeze today J My notes on this one tell me to change the
naming convention ad take care of closing it through CTS. I ran a CARS report and there are a ton of
GE complaints. However, I grabbed 1400016. Could you read through that one to be sure I have the
right one? Im not convinced so Im squeamish about changing anything without checking with you.
Thanks!
Kellie
Note to Kellie:
Per phone conv. With DE 1/17/14holding until we hear from Charles Myers. Based on feedback,
may need to enter as new then send forward and close.
Hello Charles,
As always, going through some older stuff. Is this one that James Woods may have sent to your
group by any chance? Please let me know if you have this complaint and/or accept it.
Thanks!!
Donna
Thanks and Ill wait to hear back from James before processing this complaint further in OC.
Donna
http://www.volusonclub.com/emea/insite
Donna,
James ccing you in case these devices are OIR regulated. Thanks
-- Steve
Steve Silverman
Director, Office of Compliance
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
(301) 796-5500
Our mission is to protect and promote public health by evaluating, enhancing, and
ensuring compliance with medical device laws, resulting in the availability of high-quality
medical devices.
Our vision is to take actions that enable maximum device safety and effectiveness.
Respected Steven,
I am a lead engineer by profession. Background in electronics & communications engg, India. I have
masters degree in computer science from Cleveland state and post graduate management-economics
from India & system design from MIT(I haven't completed MIT course). I haveextensive work
experience for designing and developing products and services for over 8 years now. I have worked on
Genome sequencing InVitro as well.
My point was::Fixing defects are very early stage, doing proper design at the beginning/early stage is
better, because doing the same LATER ON..cost, time, efforts increase exponentially higher and puts
lots of consequences andrippleeffects on the team, company, customers and stake holders.
Ph: 4843629716-----------------------------------------------------------------
There were issues with product quality itself.ProductInsite Excwas aging and dying with
almost disaster level situation (60000 medical devices communicate to this product/system.
)There were 2000-600 Defects in connectivity platform in production and some were
unresolved for almost ten years. I found out security issues /HIPPA issues.
Insite Exc(Insite Express Connect)product does not have a proper logging/audit trail/reporting available in
production environment. I confirmed it with Mike Walls.
HIPPA 164.312(b) Technical safeguards Standard: Audit controlsAudit controls refer to the capability to
record and examine system activity.
And it's replacement project RSVP with GE intelligent platforms; failed after two years.The
previous connectivity model Insite Exc have performance and maintainability , quality,
security issues. This new connectivity model for the connectivity platformsby
retaining the existing agents at device side while upgrading the back office
infrastructure.
When it occurred that "why we are still shipping defective InsiteExc product ; David Mehring manager replied
during a group meeting that "Connectivity isbetterthan InsiteExc product" (means at least medical device will
have connectivity).
Customers have complained several times asInsiteExc productwas not working and unavailable for
more than 23 times in a year.
From: Kangoma, Prince P*
To: Myers, Charles F
Cc: Ochs, Robert
Subject: FW: information about GE Healthcare
Date: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 11:44:42 AM
Attachments: RE information about GE Healthcare.msg
Thanks,
Peter
Hello Peter,
Please scan this chain of e-mails and the attachment into CTS as a Trade Complaint, assign a COR
number, and please assign to me. I spoke with the complainant and will receive this as an
assignment so I can make notes in CTS.
Thanks,
Charles
Charles F. Myers
FDA/CDRH/OIR/DRH
Phone: 301-796-5619
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda hhs.gov
From: Engleman, Donna
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 10:52 AM
To: Myers, Charles F
Cc: OC Medical Device Complaints and Responses
Subject: FW: information about GE Healthcare
Hello Charles,
As always, going through some older stuff. Is this one that James Woods may have sent to your
group by any chance? Please let me know if you have this complaint and/or accept it.
Thanks!!
Donna
From: Engleman, Donna
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 6:43 PM
To: Silverman, Steven
Cc: Woods, James L.; MacFarland, William C; Welch, Jan; OC Medical Device Complaints and Responses
Subject: RE: information about GE Healthcare
Thanks and Ill wait to hear back from James before processing this complaint further in OC.
Donna
http://www.volusonclub.com/emea/insite
Donna,
James ccing you in case these devices are OIR regulated. Thanks
-- Steve
Steve Silverman
Director, Office of Compliance
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
(301) 796-5500
Our mission is to protect and promote public health by evaluating, enhancing, and
ensuring compliance with medical device laws, resulting in the availability of high-quality
medical devices.
Our vision is to take actions that enable maximum device safety and effectiveness.
Respected Steven,
I am a lead engineer by profession. Background in electronics & communications engg, India. I have
masters degree in computer science from Cleveland state and post graduate management-economics
from India & system design from MIT(I haven't completed MIT course). I haveextensive work
experience for designing and developing products and services for over 8 years now. I have worked on
Genome sequencing InVitro as well.
My point was::Fixing defects are very early stage, doing proper design at the beginning/early stage is
better, because doing the same LATER ON..cost, time, efforts increase exponentially higher and puts
lots of consequences andrippleeffects on the team, company, customers and stake holders.
Ph: 4843629716-----------------------------------------------------------------
There were issues with product quality itself.ProductInsite Excwas aging and dying with
almost disaster level situation (60000 medical devices communicate to this product/system.
)There were 2000-600 Defects in connectivity platform in production and some were
unresolved for almost ten years. I found out security issues /HIPPA issues.
Insite Exc(Insite Express Connect)product does not have a proper logging/audit trail/reporting available in
production environment. I confirmed it with Mike Walls.
HIPPA 164.312(b) Technical safeguards Standard: Audit controlsAudit controls refer to the capability to
record and examine system activity.
And it's replacement project RSVP with GE intelligent platforms; failed after two years.The
previous connectivity model Insite Exc have performance and maintainability , quality,
security issues. This new connectivity model for the connectivity platformsby
retaining the existing agents at device side while upgrading the back office
infrastructure.
When it occurred that "why we are still shipping defective InsiteExc product ; David Mehring manager replied
during a group meeting that "Connectivity isbetterthan InsiteExc product" (means at least medical device will
have connectivity).
Customers have complained several times asInsiteExc productwas not working and unavailable for
more than 23 times in a year.
From: Ochs, Robert
To: Myers, Charles F
Subject: FW: Question ref: complaints about a GE software interfacing program
Date: Monday, February 22, 2016 3:21:00 PM
Hi Charlie,
Yes, please proceed with providing the documents, and answering questions. You can cc Mary and
the ombudsman. You could let him know that we have forwarded him to the ombudsman over
repeated contact as Mary just sent.
Thanks,
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer
service you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=500&D=560&B=561&E=&S=E
I think I already did, but please go ahead. Meanwhile I have another FOI request which I will
look at this evening. Will forward to you and Charlie now.
-mary
Sentfrommygovernment-issuedhandhelddevice
From: Ochs, Robert
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 3:11 PM
To: Pastel, Mary
Subject: FW: Question ref: complaints about a GE software interfacing program
Hi Mary,
Im going to recommend that Charlie answer the question and provide any documents, and cc you
the ombudsman since we had forwarded this person to them after repeated contacts.
Thank you,
Robert
Robert Ochs, PhD
Director
FDA/CDRH/OIR/Division of Radiological Health
(301) 796-6661
Robert.Ochs@fda.hhs.gov
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer
service you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=500&D=560&B=561&E=&S=E
_____________________________________________
From: Myers, Charles F
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:03 PM
To: Pastel, Mary
Cc: Ochs, Robert
Subject: FW: Question ref: complaints about a GE software interfacing program
Hi Mary,
Thanks,
Charlie
Charles F. Myers
FDA/CDRH/OIR/DRH
Phone: 301-796-5619
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda.hhs.gov
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer
service you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=500&D=560&B=561&E=&S=E
_____________________________________________
From: Smith, James - OCC
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 8:56 AM
To: Myers, Charles F
Subject: Question ref: complaints about a GE software interfacing program
Charles
The US Attorneys Office in San Francisco contacted me yesterday asking about whether there had
been an FDA investigation into allegations of safety issues with the GE Insite Exc, which appears to
me, from the GE Healthcare website information, to be some sort of software which allows a GE
tech to remote into ultrasound displays to help troubleshoot issues with those devices. The
allegations come from someone who contacted the USAO and asked them to investigate GE
Healthcare for health care fraud based on the purported problems with the GE Insite Exc.
Ive attached (below) what appears to be an email from you to the complainant, Madhuri Trivedi,
from February 2014, as well as what appears to be a letter to the same person from you in April
2015 about the complainants reporting of purported problems with this software.
I could not find anything in the Device Master Database for this software, so I am wondering
whether it is even considered a medical device, or if it is cleared as part of some other device made
by GE Healthcare.
Jim Smith
Senior Counsel
Office of the Chief Counsel
US Food and Drug Administration
White Oak Bldg. 32
Room 4374
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Telephone: 301.796.8718
cell: 202.510.4283
fax: 301.847.8618
james.smith@fda.hhs.gov
This e-mail message is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s)
named above. It may contain information that is protected, privileged, or
confidential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to
persons not authorized to receive such information. If you are not the
intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly
prohibited. If you think you have received this e-mail message in error, please
e-mail the sender immediately at james.smith@fda.hhs.gov.
Hello Jim
As you requested attached are the multiple e-mails (some with attachments) that involve Ms. Madhuri Trivedi.
Regards
Charles
Charles F. Myers
Post Market Team Leader - Radiological Health
Division of Radiological Health
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological
Health (OIR)
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
WO66 - Room 4645
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring MD 20993
Phone 301-796-5619
Fax 301-847-8502
E-mail Charles.Myers@fda.hhs.gov
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer service you have received https //www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O 500&D 560&B 561&E &S E
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Charles
The US Attorneys Office in San Francisco contacted me yesterday asking about whether there had been an FDA investigation into allegations of safety issues with the GE Insite Exc which appears to me from the GE
Healthcare website information to be some sort of software which allows a GE tech to remote into ultrasound displays to help troubleshoot issues with those devices. The allegations come from someone who
contacted the USAO and asked them to investigate GE Healthcare for health care fraud based on the purported problems with the GE Insite Exc.
I ve attached (below) what appears to be an email from you to the complainant Madhuri Trivedi from February 2014 as well as what appears to be a letter to the same person from you in April 2015 about the
complainant s reporting of purported problems with this software.
I could not find anything in the Device Master Database for this software so I am wondering whether it is even considered a medical device or if it is cleared as part of some other device made by GE Healthcare.
Jim Smith
Senior Counsel
Office of the Chief Counsel
US Food and Drug Administration
White Oak Bldg 32
Room 4374
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
This e-mail message is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) named above It may contain information that is protected, privileged, or confidential, and it
should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination,
distribution or copying is strictly prohibited If you think you have received this e-mail message in error, please e-mail the sender immediately at
james smith@fda hhs gov
(b) (5)
Hi James,
I will speak with Robert and we can set something up with Madhuri Trivedi.
Charles
Charles F. Myers
FDA/CDRH/OIR/DRH
Phone: 301-796-5619
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda hhs.gov
From: Woods, James L.
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:47 PM
To: Myers, Charles F; Ochs, Robert
Cc: Boyd, Sean M; Weixel, Patrick B; Pastel, Mary; Morris, Janine M.; Gutierrez, Alberto
Subject: RE: information about GE Healthcare
Hello Charles and Robert: I am troubled by some of the statements made by this person such
There were issues with product quality itself , 60000 medical devices communicate to this
product/ system . Would it be possible if you guys could call this person and get to what he or she
is saying ? thanks
From: Myers, Charles F
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:20 PM
To: Ochs, Robert; Woods, James L.
Cc: Boyd, Sean M; Weixel, Patrick B; Pastel, Mary; Morris, Janine M.
Subject: RE: information about GE Healthcare
Robert,
Thanks for your valuable insight!
Charlie
Charles F. Myers
FDA/CDRH/OIR/DRH
Phone: 301-796-5619
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda hhs.gov
From: Ochs, Robert
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:17 PM
To: Myers, Charles F; Woods, James L.
Cc: Boyd, Sean M; Weixel, Patrick B; Pastel, Mary; Morris, Janine M.
Subject: RE: information about GE Healthcare
Hi,
(b) (5)
(b) (5)
Thanks,
Robert
From: Myers, Charles F
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:56 PM
To: Woods, James L.; Pastel, Mary; Morris, Janine M.
Cc: Boyd, Sean M; Weixel, Patrick B; Ochs, Robert
Subject: RE: information about GE Healthcare
James,
(b) (5)
(b) (5)
Charles
Charles F. Myers
FDA/CDRH/OIR/DRH
Phone: 301-796-5619
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda hhs.gov
From: Woods, James L.
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:44 PM
To: Pastel, Mary; Morris, Janine M.
Cc: Boyd, Sean M; Weixel, Patrick B; Myers, Charles F
Subject: RE: information about GE Healthcare
I feel as though I am becoming a pest about this issue. Please excuse me. Has a decision been
made? thanks
From: Woods, James L.
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 10:45 PM
To: Pastel, Mary; Morris, Janine M.
Subject: Fw: information about GE Healthcare
My point was::Fixing defects are very early stage, doing proper design at the beginning/early stage is
better, because doing the same LATER ON..cost, time, efforts increase exponentially higher and puts
lots of consequences andrippleeffects on the team, company, customers and stake holders.
Ph: 4843629716-----------------------------------------------------------------
There were issues with product quality itself.ProductInsite Excwas aging and dying with
almost disaster level situation (60000 medical devices communicate to this product/system.
)There were 2000-600 Defects in connectivity platform in production and some were
unresolved for almost ten years. I found out security issues /HIPPA issues.
Insite Exc(Insite Express Connect)product does not have a proper logging/audit trail/reporting available in
production environment. I confirmed it with Mike Walls.
HIPPA 164.312(b) Technical safeguards Standard: Audit controlsAudit controls refer to the capability to
record and examine system activity.
And it's replacement project RSVP with GE intelligent platforms; failed after two years.The
previous connectivity model Insite Exc have performance and maintainability , quality,
security issues. This new connectivity model for the connectivity platformsby
retaining the existing agents at device side while upgrading the back office
infrastructure.
When it occurred that "why we are still shipping defective InsiteExc product ; David Mehring manager replied
during a group meeting that "Connectivity isbetterthan InsiteExc product" (means at least medical device will
have connectivity).
Customers have complained several times asInsiteExc productwas not working and unavailable for
more than 23 times in a year.
From: McFarland, Scott
To: Lubert, Ryan; Myers, Charles F; Pastel, Mary; Woods, James L.; Ochs, Robert
Cc: CDRH-OIR-RegCounsel
Subject: RE: Information about GE Healthcare
Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 8:41:26 PM
Can someone send me an electronic copy of the letter that went out? Thanks.
Scott
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE PARTY TO WHOM IT IS
ADDRESSED. IT MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL,
AND PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE BY LAW. If you are not the addressee, or a person
authorized to deliver the document to the addressee, you are hereby notified that any review,
disclosure, dissemination, copying, or other action based on the content of this communication is
not authorized. If you have received this document in error, immediately notify the sender by e-
mail or phone.
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer
service you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=500&D=510&B=511&E=&S=E
The updated letter attached to this email has incorporated those edits.
Regards,
Ryan
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE PARTY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED. IT MAY CONTAIN
INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE BY LAW. If you are not
the addressee, or a person authorized to deliver the document to the addressee, you are hereby notified that any
review, disclosure, dissemination, copying, or other action based on the content of this communication is not
authorized. If you have received this document in error, immediately notify the sender by e-mail or phone.
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding
the customer service you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?
O=100&D=130&B=131&E=&S=E
Hi Ryan,
Thank you for your DRAFT e-mail. I have 1-2 suggested edits.
Regards,
Charles
Charles F. Myers
FDA/CDRH/OIR/DRH
Phone: 301-796-5619
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda.hhs.gov
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer
service you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=500&D=560&B=561&E=&S=E
Hi Everyone,
(b) (5)
Regards,
Ryan
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE PARTY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED. IT MAY CONTAIN
INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE BY LAW. If you are not
the addressee, or a person authorized to deliver the document to the addressee, you are hereby notified that any
review, disclosure, dissemination, copying, or other action based on the content of this communication is not
authorized. If you have received this document in error, immediately notify the sender by e-mail or phone.
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding
the customer service you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?
O=100&D=130&B=131&E=&S=E
Hi Ryan,
Can you modify the attached letter to fit the situation below and make a suggested reply back?
Thanks.
Regards,
Scott
Scott McFarland, J.D.
Associate Director, Regulatory Counsel
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and
Radiological Health
Center for Devices and
Radiological Health
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Ave
WO66, Room 5543
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Phone: 301-796-6217
E-mail: scott.mcfarland@fda.hhs.gov
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE PARTY TO WHOM IT IS
ADDRESSED. IT MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL,
AND PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE BY LAW. If you are not the addressee, or a person
authorized to deliver the document to the addressee, you are hereby notified that any review,
disclosure, dissemination, copying, or other action based on the content of this communication is
not authorized. If you have received this document in error, immediately notify the sender by e-
mail or phone.
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer
service you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=500&D=510&B=511&E=&S=E
From: Pastel, Mary
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:08 PM
To: Woods, James L.; Myers, Charles F; Ochs, Robert
Cc: CDRH-OIR-RegCounsel
Subject: RE: Information about GE Healthcare
(b) (5)
- mary
Mary S Pastel, ScD
Deputy Director for Radiological Health
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
White Oak Bldg 66 Rm 4680
10903 New Hampshire Ave
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
301-796-6887
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer service
you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=500&D=510&B=510&E=&S=E
Typically we do not share any info involving an open investigation. Is this matter different? thanks
Okay. I have a question: Can we know what is the status/details of this investigation. It would help QuiTam
attorney for the analysis related to it.
Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Woods, James L. <James.Woods@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
I think it is best that we take a look at the email first then if there are questions we can have a good
dialogue through the phone or email. thanks
Thanks Mr. Woods. I will send that..Is there a way to talk as well because in two way
conversation helps to clarify and ask questions if need to understand more and/or provide
information etc.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Woods, James L. <James.Woods@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
Hello Madhuri Trivedi: Please send me an email that describes the additional info. I will then make
sure that Charles as well as others in his Division are alerted. thanks
There was something with email of Mr. Myers hence I am forwarding this to you. Usually
Mr. Myers's reply promptly so. I have some additional information and wanted to talk.
Attorney Tevy Deming calculated money amount-fraud to government ..it was large amount....Also there were 600-
2000 defects in production software . many were unresolved for ten years. So Tevy was calculating that would
government have paid GE for buying medical devices and service contract..if they would have known these ...Also
GE claimed HIPPA/HITECH compliance and solid and robust audit trails and reporting in this Insite Exc product as
false claims and hence induced government to buy multi million worth of devices/service contract as this serivce
contracts range from $200k plus per device etc.
Law firm attorney in Washington DC wanted to talk to earlier, but wasn't sure. He said one
of his client worked with FDA for two three years in investigation for pharma company and it
was successful . Then he worked on this matter. We need to talk . There are fraudulent
inducement and other whistleblower matter so. Thanks and regards . First I was scared that
GE would try to hurt me/ harm me; but they already know that I have spoken to FDA. So i
became stronger. I reported to OSHA -whistleblower.gov; but their 22 statues excludes
medical device and pharma.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Madhuri Trivedi <mcis99@gmail.com> wrote:
Respected Charles,
I waned to get in touch about this information. Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Myers, Charles F <Charles.Myers@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
Further, on 01/31/2014, I spoke with you on the telephone regarding this matter and
confirmed that this product is a software based connectivity product that is used to
directly connect GE medical equipment to live clinical applications and technical
support experts.
Thank you for providing this information to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Information from regulated industry is often very helpful to us in identifying problems
with marketed products and possible violations of the laws that we enforce. We take
such reports seriously, and we will evaluate this matter to determine what follow-up
action is appropriate. The type and extent of any follow-up is dependent upon the
nature of the problem, the possible impact on the public health, and the availability of
our resources.
While FDA does not provide information on ongoing investigations, information can
be obtained pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, once an
investigation is closed. Requests for information may be online at the following
address:
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/foi/FOIRequest/requestinfo.cfm
Should you have any questions or comments pertaining to this letter, please contact
Charles Myers at the above letterhead address, by telephone at 301-796-5619 or by
e-mail at Charles.myers@fda.hhs.gov. In any written follow-up response, please
clearly reference FDA reference number COR14000050.
Regards,
Charles
Charles F. Myers
Post Market Team Leader - Radiological Health
Division of Radiological Health
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological
Health (OIR)
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
WO66 - Room 4645
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
Phone: 301-796-5619
Fax: 301-847-8502
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda hhs.go v
From: McFarland, Scott
To: Pastel, Mary; Woods, James L.; Myers, Charles F; Ochs, Robert; Lubert, Ryan
Cc: CDRH-OIR-RegCounsel
Subject: RE: Information about GE Healthcare
Date: Monday, March 16, 2015 9:29:42 PM
Attachments: FDW5110552CA272 LDAPMAIL 10122012-172703.pdf
Hi Ryan,
Can you modify the attached letter to fit the situation below and make a suggested reply back?
Thanks.
Regards,
Scott
Scott McFarland, J.D.
Associate Director, Regulatory Counsel
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and
Radiological Health
Center for Devices and
Radiological Health
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Ave
WO66, Room 5543
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Phone: 301-796-6217
E-mail: scott.mcfarland@fda.hhs.gov
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE PARTY TO WHOM IT IS
ADDRESSED. IT MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL,
AND PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE BY LAW. If you are not the addressee, or a person
authorized to deliver the document to the addressee, you are hereby notified that any review,
disclosure, dissemination, copying, or other action based on the content of this communication is
not authorized. If you have received this document in error, immediately notify the sender by e-
mail or phone.
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer
service you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=500&D=510&B=511&E=&S=E
From: Pastel, Mary
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:08 PM
To: Woods, James L.; Myers, Charles F; Ochs, Robert
Cc: CDRH-OIR-RegCounsel
Subject: RE: Information about GE Healthcare
(b) (5)
- mary
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer service
you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=500&D=510&B=510&E=&S=E
Typically we do not share any info involving an open investigation. Is this matter different? thanks
Okay. I have a question: Can we know what is the status/details of this investigation. It would help QuiTam
attorney for the analysis related to it.
Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Woods, James L. <James.Woods@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
I think it is best that we take a look at the email first then if there are questions we can have a good
dialogue through the phone or email. thanks
Thanks Mr. Woods. I will send that..Is there a way to talk as well because in two way
conversation helps to clarify and ask questions if need to understand more and/or provide
information etc.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Woods, James L. <James.Woods@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
Hello Madhuri Trivedi: Please send me an email that describes the additional info. I will then make
sure that Charles as well as others in his Division are alerted. thanks
There was something with email of Mr. Myers hence I am forwarding this to you. Usually
Mr. Myers's reply promptly so. I have some additional information and wanted to talk.
Attorney Tevy Deming calculated money amount-fraud to government ..it was large amount....Also there were 600-
2000 defects in production software . many were unresolved for ten years. So Tevy was calculating that would
government have paid GE for buying medical devices and service contract..if they would have known these ...Also
GE claimed HIPPA/HITECH compliance and solid and robust audit trails and reporting in this Insite Exc product as
false claims and hence induced government to buy multi million worth of devices/service contract as this serivce
contracts range from $200k plus per device etc.
Law firm attorney in Washington DC wanted to talk to earlier, but wasn't sure. He said one
of his client worked with FDA for two three years in investigation for pharma company and it
was successful . Then he worked on this matter. We need to talk . There are fraudulent
inducement and other whistleblower matter so. Thanks and regards . First I was scared that
GE would try to hurt me/ harm me; but they already know that I have spoken to FDA. So i
became stronger. I reported to OSHA -whistleblower.gov; but their 22 statues excludes
medical device and pharma.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Madhuri Trivedi <mcis99@gmail.com> wrote:
Respected Charles,
I waned to get in touch about this information. Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Myers, Charles F <Charles.Myers@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
Further, on 01/31/2014, I spoke with you on the telephone regarding this matter and
confirmed that this product is a software based connectivity product that is used to
directly connect GE medical equipment to live clinical applications and technical
support experts.
Thank you for providing this information to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Information from regulated industry is often very helpful to us in identifying problems
with marketed products and possible violations of the laws that we enforce. We take
such reports seriously, and we will evaluate this matter to determine what follow-up
action is appropriate. The type and extent of any follow-up is dependent upon the
nature of the problem, the possible impact on the public health, and the availability of
our resources.
While FDA does not provide information on ongoing investigations, information can
be obtained pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, once an
investigation is closed. Requests for information may be online at the following
address:
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/foi/FOIRequest/requestinfo.cfm
Should you have any questions or comments pertaining to this letter, please contact
Charles Myers at the above letterhead address, by telephone at 301-796-5619 or by
e-mail at Charles.myers@fda.hhs.gov. In any written follow-up response, please
clearly reference FDA reference number COR14000050.
Regards,
Charles
Charles F. Myers
Post Market Team Leader - Radiological Health
Division of Radiological Health
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological
Health (OIR)
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
WO66 - Room 4645
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
Phone: 301-796-5619
Fax: 301-847-8502
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda hhs.go v
From: Pastel, Mary
To: Woods, James L.; Myers, Charles F; Ochs, Robert
Cc: CDRH-OIR-RegCounsel
Subject: RE: Information about GE Healthcare
Date: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:08:00 PM
(b) (5)
- mary
Mary S Pastel, ScD
Deputy Director for Radiological Health
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
White Oak Bldg 66 Rm 4680
10903 New Hampshire Ave
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
301-796-6887
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer service
you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=500&D=510&B=510&E=&S=E
From: Woods, James L.
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 2:56 PM
To: Pastel, Mary; Myers, Charles F; Ochs, Robert
Subject: FW: Information about GE Healthcare
Typically we do not share any info involving an open investigation. Is this matter different? thanks
From: Madhuri Trivedi [mailto:mcis99@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 2:32 PM
To: Woods, James L.
Cc: Myers, Charles F
Subject: Re: Information about GE Healthcare
Okay. I have a question: Can we know what is the status/details of this investigation. It would help QuiTam
attorney for the analysis related to it.
Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Woods, James L. <James.Woods@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
I think it is best that we take a look at the email first then if there are questions we can have a good
dialogue through the phone or email. thanks
Thanks Mr. Woods. I will send that..Is there a way to talk as well because in two way
conversation helps to clarify and ask questions if need to understand more and/or provide
information etc.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Woods, James L. <James.Woods@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
Hello Madhuri Trivedi: Please send me an email that describes the additional info. I will then make
sure that Charles as well as others in his Division are alerted. thanks
There was something with email of Mr. Myers hence I am forwarding this to you. Usually
Mr. Myers's reply promptly so. I have some additional information and wanted to talk.
Attorney Tevy Deming calculated money amount-fraud to government ..it was large amount....Also there were 600-
2000 defects in production software . many were unresolved for ten years. So Tevy was calculating that would
government have paid GE for buying medical devices and service contract..if they would have known these ...Also
GE claimed HIPPA/HITECH compliance and solid and robust audit trails and reporting in this Insite Exc product as
false claims and hence induced government to buy multi million worth of devices/service contract as this serivce
contracts range from $200k plus per device etc.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Madhuri Trivedi <mcis99@gmail.com> wrote:
Respected Charles,
I waned to get in touch about this information. Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Myers, Charles F <Charles.Myers@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
Further, on 01/31/2014, I spoke with you on the telephone regarding this matter and
confirmed that this product is a software based connectivity product that is used to
directly connect GE medical equipment to live clinical applications and technical
support experts.
Thank you for providing this information to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Information from regulated industry is often very helpful to us in identifying problems
with marketed products and possible violations of the laws that we enforce. We take
such reports seriously, and we will evaluate this matter to determine what follow-up
action is appropriate. The type and extent of any follow-up is dependent upon the
nature of the problem, the possible impact on the public health, and the availability of
our resources.
While FDA does not provide information on ongoing investigations, information can
be obtained pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, once an
investigation is closed. Requests for information may be online at the following
address:
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/foi/FOIRequest/requestinfo.cfm
Should you have any questions or comments pertaining to this letter, please contact
Charles Myers at the above letterhead address, by telephone at 301-796-5619 or by
e-mail at Charles.myers@fda.hhs.gov. In any written follow-up response, please
clearly reference FDA reference number COR14000050.
Regards,
Charles
Charles F. Myers
Post Market Team Leader - Radiological Health
Division of Radiological Health
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological
Health (OIR)
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
WO66 - Room 4645
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
Phone: 301-796-5619
Fax: 301-847-8502
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda hhs.go v
From: Myers, Charles F
To: Kangoma, Prince P*
Cc: Ochs, Robert
Subject: RE: information about GE Healthcare
Date: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 11:45:33 AM
Thanks, Peter!
Charles
Charles F. Myers
FDA/CDRH/OIR/DRH
Phone: 301-796-5619
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda hhs.gov
From: Kangoma, Prince P*
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 11:45 AM
To: Myers, Charles F
Cc: Ochs, Robert
Subject: FW: information about GE Healthcare
Thanks,
Peter
Hello Peter,
Please scan this chain of e-mails and the attachment into CTS as a Trade Complaint, assign a COR
number, and please assign to me. I spoke with the complainant and will receive this as an
assignment so I can make notes in CTS.
Thanks,
Charles
Charles F. Myers
FDA/CDRH/OIR/DRH
Phone: 301-796-5619
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda hhs.gov
From: Engleman, Donna
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 10:52 AM
To: Myers, Charles F
Cc: OC Medical Device Complaints and Responses
Subject: FW: information about GE Healthcare
Hello Charles,
As always, going through some older stuff. Is this one that James Woods may have sent to your
group by any chance? Please let me know if you have this complaint and/or accept it.
Thanks!!
Donna
Thanks and Ill wait to hear back from James before processing this complaint further in OC.
Donna
http://www.volusonclub.com/emea/insite
Donna,
James ccing you in case these devices are OIR regulated. Thanks
-- Steve
Steve Silverman
Director, Office of Compliance
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
(301) 796-5500
Our mission is to protect and promote public health by evaluating, enhancing, and
ensuring compliance with medical device laws, resulting in the availability of high-quality
medical devices.
Our vision is to take actions that enable maximum device safety and effectiveness.
Respected Steven,
I am a lead engineer by profession. Background in electronics & communications engg, India. I have
masters degree in computer science from Cleveland state and post graduate management-economics
from India & system design from MIT(I haven't completed MIT course). I haveextensive work
experience for designing and developing products and services for over 8 years now. I have worked on
Genome sequencing InVitro as well.
My point was::Fixing defects are very early stage, doing proper design at the beginning/early stage is
better, because doing the same LATER ON..cost, time, efforts increase exponentially higher and puts
lots of consequences andrippleeffects on the team, company, customers and stake holders.
Ph: 4843629716-----------------------------------------------------------------
There were issues with product quality itself.ProductInsite Excwas aging and dying with
almost disaster level situation (60000 medical devices communicate to this product/system.
)There were 2000-600 Defects in connectivity platform in production and some were
unresolved for almost ten years. I found out security issues /HIPPA issues.
Insite Exc(Insite Express Connect)product does not have a proper logging/audit trail/reporting available in
production environment. I confirmed it with Mike Walls.
HIPPA 164.312(b) Technical safeguards Standard: Audit controlsAudit controls refer to the capability to
record and examine system activity.
And it's replacement project RSVP with GE intelligent platforms; failed after two years.The
previous connectivity model Insite Exc have performance and maintainability , quality,
security issues. This new connectivity model for the connectivity platformsby
retaining the existing agents at device side while upgrading the back office
infrastructure.
When it occurred that "why we are still shipping defective InsiteExc product ; David Mehring manager replied
during a group meeting that "Connectivity isbetterthan InsiteExc product" (means at least medical device will
have connectivity).
Customers have complained several times asInsiteExc productwas not working and unavailable for
more than 23 times in a year.
I believe contact with this person is through the Ombudsman. Please dont reply or forward the
email to anyone but Abiy Desta.
Also I need to support myself work part time and work on start up so I can afford financing.
Venture capitalists don't like start up founders as such who are looking for their money to
pay own bills. :).....
Respected Mr. Woods, It was a tough day yesterday and I may have vented some frustration
of yesterday into email..if so ..I apologies..for example "lawyer language" ..I know I can
write in my simple language to FDA..:)
Also GE released a statement to all shareholders around Nov 2014 ..and gave warning about
security it their product dated back to 2010..I started to work for GE in 2010..so looks some
coincident.
Also David Boise law firm - BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP..attorney David Nelson
looked into SEC matter....He said that there is a case but at that point I was looking
for reinstatement and also QUiTam was another thing..More cases have been filed under
QuiTam then SEC...He said they usually represent company ..
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Madhuri Trivedi <mcis99@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Woods,
I have been very tied up..and I am not a lawyer but engineer so writing such things gets
tricky..
I can draft info but don't have time..so just sending a letter that attorney sent last year to
GE...
This letter is just so things are in lawyer language and also for more details I will send
another email..
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Woods, James L. <James.Woods@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
I think it is best that we take a look at the email first then if there are questions we can have a good
dialogue through the phone or email. thanks
Thanks Mr. Woods. I will send that..Is there a way to talk as well because in two way
conversation helps to clarify and ask questions if need to understand more and/or provide
information etc.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Woods, James L. <James.Woods@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
Hello Madhuri Trivedi: Please send me an email that describes the additional info. I will then make
sure that Charles as well as others in his Division are alerted. thanks
There was something with email of Mr. Myers hence I am forwarding this to you. Usually
Mr. Myers's reply promptly so. I have some additional information and wanted to talk.
Attorney Tevy Deming calculated money amount-fraud to government ..it was large amount....Also there were 600-
2000 defects in production software . many were unresolved for ten years. So Tevy was calculating that would
government have paid GE for buying medical devices and service contract..if they would have known these ...Also
GE claimed HIPPA/HITECH compliance and solid and robust audit trails and reporting in this Insite Exc product as
false claims and hence induced government to buy multi million worth of devices/service contract as this serivce
contracts range from $200k plus per device etc.
Law firm attorney in Washington DC wanted to talk to earlier, but wasn't sure. He said one
of his client worked with FDA for two three years in investigation for pharma company and it
was successful . Then he worked on this matter. We need to talk . There are fraudulent
inducement and other whistleblower matter so. Thanks and regards . First I was scared that
GE would try to hurt me/ harm me; but they already know that I have spoken to FDA. So i
became stronger. I reported to OSHA -whistleblower.gov; but their 22 statues excludes
medical device and pharma.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Madhuri Trivedi <mcis99@gmail.com> wrote:
Respected Charles,
I waned to get in touch about this information. Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Myers, Charles F <Charles.Myers@fda.hhs.gov> wrote:
Further, on 01/31/2014, I spoke with you on the telephone regarding this matter and
confirmed that this product is a software based connectivity product that is used to
directly connect GE medical equipment to live clinical applications and technical
support experts.
Thank you for providing this information to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Information from regulated industry is often very helpful to us in identifying problems
with marketed products and possible violations of the laws that we enforce. We take
such reports seriously, and we will evaluate this matter to determine what follow-up
action is appropriate. The type and extent of any follow-up is dependent upon the
nature of the problem, the possible impact on the public health, and the availability of
our resources.
While FDA does not provide information on ongoing investigations, information can
be obtained pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, once an
investigation is closed. Requests for information may be online at the following
address:
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/foi/FOIRequest/requestinfo.cfm
Should you have any questions or comments pertaining to this letter, please contact
Charles Myers at the above letterhead address, by telephone at 301-796-5619 or by
e-mail at Charles.myers@fda.hhs.gov. In any written follow-up response, please
clearly reference FDA reference number COR14000050.
Regards,
Charles
Charles F. Myers
Post Market Team Leader - Radiological Health
Division of Radiological Health
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological
Health (OIR)
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
WO66 - Room 4645
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
Phone: 301-796-5619
Fax: 301-847-8502
E-mail: Charles.Myers@fda hhs.go v
From: Sm th, James - OCC
To: Myers, Charles F
Cc: Ochs, Robert; Pastel, Mary
Subject: RE: Question ref: complaints about a GE software interfac ng program
Date: Monday, February 22, 2016 4:16:16 PM
(b) (5)
Jim Smith
Senior Counsel
Office of the Chief Counsel
US Food and Drug Administration
White Oak Bldg 32
Room 4374
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Telephone: 301 796 8718
cell: 202 510 4283
fax: 301 847 8618
james smith@fda hhs gov
This e-mail message is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) named above It may contain information that is protected, privileged, or confidential, and it
should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination,
distribution or copying is strictly prohibited If you think you have received this e-mail message in error, please e-mail the sender immediately at
james smith@fda hhs gov
Hi Mary,
I would recommend sending the letter. If you Cc me on that email I will follow-up with Ms. Trevide
and request that all future interactions be with the Ombudsmans office.
Many thanks
Abiy
Abiy B. Desta
Ombudsman
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(301)796-0293
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer service you
have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=100&D=140&B=140&E=&S=E
From: Pastel, Mary
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 9:35 AM
To: CDRH Ombudsman; McFarland, Scott
Cc: Myers, Charles F; Woods, James L.; Sage, Melissa; Ochs, Robert
Subject: RE: RE: Madhuri Trivedi
(b) (5)
- mary
Mary S Pastel, ScD
Deputy Director for Radiological Health
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
White Oak Bldg 66 Rm 4680
10903 New Hampshire Ave
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
301-796-6887
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer service
you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=500&D=510&B=510&E=&S=E
Scott,
Have you been able to locate a copy of the signed letter sent to Ms. Trividi?
Thanks
Abiy
Abiy B. Desta
Ombudsman
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(301)796-0293
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer service you
have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=100&D=140&B=140&E=&S=E
Scott,
I will contact Mr. Trivedi and ask him to direct future inquiries to the Ombudsmans office. It will be
very useful to have the signed copy of what was sent.
Many thanks
Abiy
Abiy B. Desta
Ombudsman
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(301)796-0293
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer service you
have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=100&D=140&B=140&E=&S=E
From: McFarland, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 8:49 PM
To: Desta, Abiy B.; Sage, Melissa
Cc: Myers, Charles F; Pastel, Mary; Woods, James L.; CDRH-OIR-RegCounsel; Gutierrez, Alberto
Subject: RE: Madhuri Trivedi
(b) (5)
Regards,
Scott
Scott McFarland, J.D.
Associate Director, Regulatory Counsel
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and
Radiological Health
Center for Devices and
Radiological Health
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Ave
WO66, Room 5543
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Phone: 301-796-6217
E-mail: scott.mcfarland@fda.hhs.gov
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE PARTY TO WHOM IT IS
ADDRESSED. IT MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL,
AND PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE BY LAW. If you are not the addressee, or a person
authorized to deliver the document to the addressee, you are hereby notified that any review,
disclosure, dissemination, copying, or other action based on the content of this communication is
not authorized. If you have received this document in error, immediately notify the sender by e-
mail or phone.
Excellent customer service is important to us. Please take a moment to provide feedback regarding the customer
service you have received: https://www.research.net/s/cdrhcustomerservice?O=500&D=510&B=511&E=&S=E