Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Joanna Belechak
Miss Burke
Honors English 11
Americas civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s was a fight against racial
segregation and discrimination against African Americans. Two of the most important leaders of
the movement were Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Both men dedicated their lives to
overcome the racism and injustice faced by the African Americans. In this time of racial division,
there was debate over whether it be solved in a violent or nonviolent manner. Malcolm X
believed that violent protesting was the only way to get a point across, while Martin Luther King
Jr. believed that nonviolence would have a more positive and successful impact. In my opinion,
Martin Luther King Jr.s nonviolent approach to racial equality and justice for African Americans
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X saw the civil rights movement in vastly opposite
ways. Dr. King was a pacifist. He way influenced by Gandhi and hoped for racial equality.
Malcolm X was more of a warmonger who hoped to achieve black supremacy through violent
speech, The Ballot or the Bullet, Itll be liberty, or it will be death There were only two
outcomes that could play out when fighting with threatening actions. Dissimilarly, in Dr. Kings
Belechak 2
Nonviolence: The Only Road to Freedom, he made clear that not a single person has been
killed in a nonviolent demonstration. If the African Americans shed the blood of the white men,
the white men would retaliate ruthlessly. Progress could be made without risking the lives of
those fighting.
The nonviolent movement was also far more thought out and designed for success. In his
speech, Martin Luther King Jr. states, What is needed is a strategy for change, a tactical program
which will bring the Negro into the main stream of American life as quickly as possible. The
nonviolent protestors set goals for what they were trying to achieve. Demonstrations were
tactical, so that any ill feelings would not intensify and a more peaceful vibe would remain. A
non-confrontational demonstration showed that the African Americans simply wanted to live
equally. On the other hand, violent protests were simply centered around hurting those who were
racist or discriminatory. Their actions were rash and led to more hostility and enmity. They
would give off a feeling of the African Americans being anti-white, though Malcolm X clearly
states in his speech that it doesn't mean were anti-white, but it does mean were anti-
protesters have to say. As soon as it gets violent, resentment grows towards the dissenters. Those
on the other side of the protest will begin to close off and become unwilling to make any
compromises. This was clearly seen at the most recent presidential inauguration. A series of
protests erupted throughout Washington D.C. and turned violent quickly. If it would have
remained peaceful, police forces would have respected the peoples right to protest. Instead
tensions heightened, turbulence increased, and people ended up injured and arrested. It is
Belechak 3
volatile situation will lead to many more compromises and favorable outcomes, as seen through
the actions and results of Martin Luther King Jr.s nonviolent approach to racial equality.