Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
UCLA
Peer Reviewed
Title:
Persian Period
Author:
Klotz, David, New York University
Publication Date:
09-19-2015
Series:
UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology
Permalink:
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/04j8t49v
Keywords:
History, Old Persian, hybrid, foreign domination
Local Identifier:
nelc_uee_8777
Abstract:
In the last two centuries before the arrival of Alexander the Great, Persia invaded Egypt twice
and administered it as a satrapy of the Achaemenid Empire. Although the Ptolemies later
demonized the Persians, and most traces of their rule were systematically removed, the history
of this fascinating period can be reconstructed thanks to written sources from different languages
(hieroglyphic, Demotic, Aramaic, Old Persian, Greek) and the multicultural archaeological record.
These periods of foreign domination helped solidify Egypt's national identity during the intervening
Late Period (Dynasties 28-30) and set the stage for subsequent centuries of Greek and Roman
rule.
Copyright Information:
All rights reserved unless otherwise indicated. Contact the author or original publisher for any
necessary permissions. eScholarship is not the copyright owner for deposited works. Learn more
at http://www.escholarship.org/help_copyright.html#reuse
David Klotz
EDITORS
WILLEKE WENDRICH
Editor-in-Chief
University of California, Los Angeles
JACCO DIELEMAN
Editor
University of California, Los Angeles
ELIZABETH FROOD
Editor
University of Oxford
WOLFRAM GRAJETZKI
Area Editor Time and History
University College London
JOHN BAINES
Senior Editorial Consultant
University of Oxford
Short Citation:
Klotz, 2015, Persian Period. UEE.
Full Citation:
Klotz, David, 2015, Persian Period. In Wolfram Grajetzki and Willeke Wendrich (eds.), UCLA
Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles.
http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002k45rq
David Klotz
Perserzeit
Priodes perses
In the last two centuries before the arrival of Alexander the Great, Persia invaded Egypt twice
and administered it as a satrapy of the Achaemenid Empire. Although the Ptolemies later
demonized the Persians, and most traces of their rule were systematically removed, the history of
this fascinating period can be reconstructed thanks to written sources from different languages
(hieroglyphic, Demotic, Aramaic, Old Persian, Greek) and the multicultural archaeological record.
These periods of foreign domination helped solidify Egypt's national identity during the intervening
Late Period (Dynasties 28-30) and set the stage for subsequent centuries of Greek and Roman
rule.
.
( )
.
30-28
.
cholars divide the Persian Period Depuydt 2006). To distinguish from other
S in Egypt into two separate eras, the
First Domination (Dynasty 27,
stages of Iranian history, this era is also called
Achaemenid, named after the eponymous
525-402 BCE) and the brief Second founder of the dynasty, Achaemenes
Domination that ended with the arrival of (Egyptian: jAxmjnS). In both periods, Egypt
Alexander the Great (Dynasty 31, 343-332 was governed by a Persian satrap (Egyptian:
BCE; for the problematic category of Dynasty xStrpn; Klinkott 2005).
31, see Lloyd 1988; for the chronology, see
Figure 5a. Egyptian official wearing baggy tunics, Cambyses (Klotz 2010: 152-154).
wraparound robes, and distinctly Achaemenid Archaeological evidence in some cases is
jewelry. Brooklyn Museum, 37.353. inconclusive (Burkard 1994b and 1995; von
Pilgrim 2003), but various evidence suggests
major disruptions, if not destruction, precisely
(< Bactria or Ecbatana?), refuses to return the in the late sixth century BCE (e.g., Coulon and
cult statue of Chonsu-pA-jr-sxrw to Egypt Defernez 2004: 141-142; Masson 2011: 269-
(Posener 1934: 77). 270).
This reputation may have some basis in While the Ptolemies later emphasized the
reality. The first few Ptolemies repeatedly impieties and abuses of their predecessors, the
claimed to have recovered lost Egyptian divine Persian Period was not all repression and
statues in Syro-Palestine, supposedly stolen by exploitation, and in fact there is evidence for
the Persians (Winnicki 1994). These sources acculturation and international contact during
are often dismissed as a mere anti-Persian this era. Egyptian elite officials donned Persian
topos or Ptolemaic propaganda, but garments and jewelry (figs. 5a and b; Cooney
surprisingly detailed accounts of such 1965; Mathieson, et al. 1995), just as indigenous
discoveries are recounted in the Pithom Stela officials later wore the Hellenizing mitra on
of Ptolemy II (Thiers 2007: 45-49, 100-106) their statues in the late Ptolemaic Period
and the recently discovered decree of Ptolemy (Moyer 2011); in this way privileged native
III from Akhmim (Altenmller 2009; el-Masry officials distinguished themselves as what
et al. 2012: 97-102, 164-167). Moreover, certain Pierre Briant dubbed the ethno-classe
30th Dynasty texts refer to such temple dominante (Briant 1988; Vittmann 2009).
destruction prior to the invasion by Artaxerxes Meanwhile, Persian dignitaries composed
III, and the systematic damnatio memoriae against hieroglyphic dedications for Egyptian deities in
Amasiss monuments can only be attributed to the Wadi Hammamat (Klotz 2008). Religious
Tuplin, Christopher
Image Credits
Figure 1. Carefully erased cartouche of Amasis. White Monastery Church, Sohag. Photograph by the
author.
Figure 2. Darius Cylinder, from Luxor (see Yoyotte 1952). British Museum 89.132. Photograph courtesy
of the Trustees of the British Museum.
Figure 3. Wooden shrine. Darius I offering to Anubis and Isis. British Museum, EA 37496. Photograph
courtesy of the Trustees of the British Museum.
Figure 4. Apis Stela of the General Amasis. Louvre IM 4017. (After Vercoutter 1962: pl. VIII.)
Figure 5. Egyptian officials wearing baggy tunics, wraparound robes, and distinctly Achaemenid jewelry.
Brooklyn Museum, 37.353 (fig. 5a) and 71.139 (fig. 5b). Photographs courtesy of the Brooklyn
Museum, Creative Commons.