Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Faculty of Engineering
Submitted by:
Submitted to;
Prof. Dr. Hassan Farag
February, 2012
ABSTRACT
This is a case study for cooling hydrogen sulfide gas by using water as cooling
fluid. The cooling process is carried out by using a shell and tube heat exchanger.
A theoretical background on the different classifications, different types of heat
exchangers and general methods for process design of heat exchangers was
mentioned. A detailed design work for the shell and tube heat exchanger suitable
for the case study is conducted according to the operating conditions. The design
work included the determination of the tube side, shell side, overall heat transfer
coefficient, pumping power and pumping costs of the tube side and shell side
fluids. Finally an optimization process is conducted to get the optimum
dimensions of the shell and tube heat exchanger and the optimum annual
pumping costs for the tube side and shell side fluids.
NOMENCLATURE
Ci = cost for supplying 1 ft.lbf to pump the fluid through the inside of the
tubes, $/ft. Ibf.
Co = cost for supplying 1 ft.lbf to pump the fluid through the shell side of the
exchanger, $/ ft.lbf.
CT = total annual variable cost for heat exchanger and its operation, $/year.
Dc = clearance between tubes to give smallest free area across shell axis, ft.
Gs = shell-side mass velocity across tubes based on the minimum free area
between baffles across the shell axis, lb/(h)(ft 2).
P, p = pressure, lbf/ft2.
Rdw = combined resistance of tube wall and scaling or dirt factors, [Btu/(h)(ft 2)
(oF)]-1.
V = velocity, ft/s.
GREEK SYMBOLS
= thermal diffusivity = k/pc, ft2/h.
= coefficient of volumetric expansion, l/R.
= t designates temperature-difference driving force, F; subscript f
designates across film; subscript m designates mean t; subscript oa or no
subscript designates overall t; t1 = t2 t1; t, = t1 t2; P and p designate
pressure drop; p = - P.
= emissivity, dimensionless.
= time, h.
c = latent heat of condensation, Btu/lb
= Lagrangian multiplier, dimensionless; defined by Eq. (43)
= absolute viscosity, lb/(h)(ft)
= 3.1416
= density, lb/ft3
= Stefan-Boltzmann dimensional constant for radiant heat transfer;
defined
= correction factor for nonisothermal flow, dimensionless.
i, o = dimensional factors for evaluation of Ei and Eo.
SUBSCRIPTS
f = across film or at average film temperature.
i = inside pipe or tube, based on average bulk temperature.
L = liquid at average liquid temperature.
m = mean.
o = outside pipe or tube, based on average bulk temperature.
oa = overall.
opt = optimum conditions.
u = utility fluid.
v = vapor at average vapor temperature.
w = tube or pipe wall, based on temperature at wall surface.
LIST OF FIGUR
Figure 2-2, Double pipe heat exchanger. (a) Single pass with counterflow; and (b)
multipass with counterflow............................................................................12
1. Construction,
2. Transfer processes,
3. Degrees of surface compactness,
4. Flow arrangements,
5. Pass arrangements,
6. Phase of the process fluids, and
7. Heat-transfer mechanisms.
Double Pipe Exchangers. A double pipe heat exchanger has two concentric
pipes, usually in the form of a U-bend design as shown in Figure 2-2. The flow
arrangement is pure countercurrent.
Figure 2-2, Double pipe heat exchanger. (a) Single pass with counterflow; and (b) multipass with
counterflow.
Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger. In process industries, shell and tube
exchangers are used ingreat numbers, far more than any other type of exchanger.
More than 90% of heat exchangersused in industry are of the shell and tube type.
The shell and tube heat exchangers are the work horses of industrial process
heat transfer. They are the first choice because of wellestablished procedures for
design and manufacture from a wide variety of materials, many years of
satisfactory service, and availability of codes and standards for design and
fabrication.
They are produced in the widest variety of sizes and styles. There is virtually no
limit on the operating temperature and pressure.
Coiled Tube Heat Exchanger Used for Liquefaction Systems. One of the three
classical heat exchangers used today for large-scale liquefaction systems is the
coiled tube heat exchanger (CTHE). Construction of these heat exchangers
involves winding a large number of small-bore ductile tubes in helix fashion
around a central core tube, with each exchanger containing many layers of tubes
along both the principal and radial axes. Tubes in individual layers or groups of
layers may be brought together into one or more tube plates through which
different fluids may be passed in counter flow to the single shell side fluid.
The high-pressure stream flows through the small-diameter tubes, while the low-
pressure return stream flows across the outside of the small-diameter tubes in
the annular space between the inner central core tube and the outer shell.
Pressure drops in the coiled tubes are equalized for each high-pressure stream by
using tubes of equal length and varying the spacing of these in the different
layers. Because of small-bore tubes on both sides, CTHEs do not permit
mechanical cleaning and therefore are used to handle clean, solid-free fluids or
fluids whose fouling deposits can be cleaned by chemicals. Materials are usually
aluminum alloys for cryogenics, and stainless steels for high-temperature
applications.
Plate heat exchangers are less widely used than tubular heat exchangers but
offer certain important advantages. Plate heat exchangers can be classified in
three principal groups:
Spiral Plate Heat Exchanger. Spiral plate heat exchangers (SPHEs) have been
used since the1930s, when they were originally developed in Sweden for heat
recovery in pulp mills. Spiral plate heat exchangers are classified as a type of
welded plate heat exchanger. An SPHE is fabricated by rolling a pair of relatively
long strips of plate around a split mandrel to form a pair of spiral passages.
Channel spacing is maintained uniformly along the length of the spiral passages
by means of spacer studs welded to the plate strips prior to rolling. An SPHE is
shown in Figure 2-5. For most applications, both flow channels are closed by
alternate channels welded at both sides of the spiral plate. In some services, one
of the channels is left open, whereas the other closed at both sides of the plate.
These two types of construction prevent the fluids from mixing.
Figure 2-5, Alpha-Laval spiral plate heat exchanger
SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER
The major components of a shell and tube exchanger are tubes, baffles, shell,
front head, rear head, tube sheet(s), and nozzles. Expansion joint is an important
component in the case of fixed tube-sheet exchanger for certain design conditions.
The selection criteria for a proper combination of these components are
dependent upon the operating pressures, temperatures, and thermal stresses,
corrosion characteristics of fluids, fouling, cleanability, and cost. Other
components include nozzles and supports.
Shell-and-tube heat exchangers have been constructed with heat transfer areas
from less than 0.1 m2 (1 ft2) to over 100,000 m2 (1,000,000 ft2), for pressures from
deep vacuum to over 1000 bar (15,000 psi), for temperatures from near 0 to over
1400 K (2000oF), and for all fluid services including singlephase heating and
cooling and multiphase vaporization and condensation. The key to such flexibility
is the wide range of materials of construction, forming and joining methods, and
design features that can be built into these exchangers.
The most popular type of shell and tube heat exchanger is the fixed tube-sheet
heat exchanger. It uses straight tubes secured at both ends into tube sheets,
which are firmly welded to the shell. Hence, gasketed joints are minimized in
this type, and thereby least maintenance is required. Fixed tube-sheet heat
exchangers are used where
3. The shell-side fluid is clean and tube bundle removal is not required.
(1) Stationary head-channel; (2) stationary headbonnet; (3) stationary head flange-
channel or bonnet; (4)channel cover; (5) stationary head nozzle; (6) stationary
tubesheet; (7) tubes; (8) shell; (9) shell cover; (10) shell flange-stationary head end;
(11) shell flange-rear head end; (12) shell nozzle; (13) shell cover flange; (14)
expansion joint; (15) floating tubesheet; (16) floating head cover; ( 17) floating
head cover flange; (18) floating head backing device; ( 19) split shear ring; (20)
slip-on backing flange; (21) floating head cover-external; (22) floating tubesheet
skirt; (23) paclung box; (24) packing; (25) packing gland; (26) lantern ring; (27)
tierods and spacers; (28) transverse baffles or support plates; (29) impingement
plate; (30) longitudinal baffle; (3 1) pass partition; (32) vent connection; (33) drain
The procedures used for developing the design of heat exchangers vary with the
type of problem and the preference of the worker. Some engineers prefer to
develop the design for a heat exchanger by a method known as rating an
exchanger. In this method, the engineer assumes the existence of an exchanger
and makes calculations to determine if the exchanger would handle the process
requirements under reasonable conditions. If not, a different exchanger is
assumed, and the calculations are repeated until a suitable design is developed.
For example, with a given set of process requirements, the engineer could assume
the existence of an exchanger with a designated tube size, tube spacing, baffle
type, baffle spacing, and number of tubes and passes. The engineer might then
proceed through the process-design calculations by computing an overall heat-
transfer coefficient and evaluating all flow rates, areas, lengths, and pressure
drops. Repeated trials may be necessary to obtain an accurate overall coefficient.
If the results of the final design indicate that the assumed exchanger has
reasonable dimensions, reasonable cost, and acceptable pressure drops, the unit
is considered as adequate and the design is complete.
1. Determine the rates of flow and rate of heat transfer necessary to meet the
given conditions.
2. Decide on the type of heat exchanger to be used, and indicate the basic
equipment specifications.
3. Evaluate the overall heat-transfer coefficient and also the film coefficients,
if necessary. In many cases, fluid velocities must be determined in order to
obtain accurate heat-transfer coefficients.
4. Evaluate the mean temperature-difference driving force.
5. Determine the necessary area of heat transfer and the exchanger
dimensions.
6. Analyze the results to see if all dimensions, costs, pressure drops, and
other design details are satisfactory.
7. If the results of (6) show that the exchanger is not satisfactory, the
specifications given in (2) are inadequate. Choose new specifications and
repeat steps 3 through 7 until a satisfactory design is obtained.
3. PROBLEM STATEMENT
H2S gas flowing at a rate of 4000 CFM (cubic feet per minute) at 20 bars is to be
cooled from 1200oF to 600oF using water that enters at 80 F and comes out at
150 F.
It is required to perform optimization to come out with a Shell and Tube Heat
Exchanger design that can carry out the duty and the following information
should be included in the design
OPTIMIZATION
1. FLUIDS TO BE USED
Process fluid: Hydrogen Sulfide gas (H2S), It is the tube side fluid
Fluid properties:
Bulk Temperature(tb)
Pressure(P) 1 atm
w i=135066lb m /h
Cooling water Consumption
w u=347312lbm /h
3. ENTRANCE TEMPERATURE
LMTD
T m=754.2
5. FOULING FACTOR
hd=300 Btu/h.ft2.h
Duty, 6 ,
q=2410 Btu/h
Overall heat transfer coefficient, Uoa=43 Btu/h.ft2.oF
MECHANICAL INFORMATION
1. SIZE OF TUBES
1 INCH OD 16BWG
3. SHELL SIZE
OPTIMIZATION
7. FLUIDS TO BE USED
Process fluid: Hydrogen Sulfide gas (H2S), It is the tube side fluid
Fluid properties:
Bulk Temperature(tb)
Pressure(P) 1 atm
w i=135066lb m /h
Cooling water Consumption
w u=347312lbm /h
9. ENTRANCE TEMPERATURE
LMTD
T m=754.2
hd=300 Btu/h.ft2.h
Duty, 6 ,
q=2410 Btu/h
Overall heat transfer coefficient, Uoa=20.193 Btu/h.ft2.oF
MECHANICAL INFORMATION
6. SIZE OF TUBES
1 INCH OD 16BWG
8. SHELL SIZE
2. Peter, Max. S. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers. Tokyo :
McGraw Hill, Inc., 1981.
APPENDIX
A. DESIGN CALCULATIONS
A.1. FLUIDS DATA AND PROPERTIES
Process fluid: Hydrogen Sulfide gas (H2S), It is the tube side fluid
Fluid properties:
Bulk Temperature(tb)
Density () 0.685lbm/ft31
1
Fluid properties:
Pressure(P) 1 atm
psia
20
P Mwt
= =
RT
Cp
N Pr =
k
Density (f) 0.536lbm/ft3
FOR H2S
Mwt=34 lbm/lb-mol
T1=1200+460=1660oR
3
ft
20 240000 2=34 lb m/lbmol
P V Mwt h
wi= = 3
=134688 l bm /h
RT 10.73 ft .atm /lbmol R 1660 R
qu=qp=Uavg AavgTm
TO CALCULATE DUTY Q
l bm Btu 7
q=135066 0.3 (1200600 ) =2.410 Btu/h
h lb m.
FOR WATER
q=wuCpwT=wiCpt
6 Btu
24 10
q h
w u= = =346341lb m /h
Cp w T Btu
1 ( 15080 ) F
lbm F
TO CALCULATE TM 1200 F
600 F
Tm=FT*T lm
T1=1050F
T2=520oF
T1/ T2 =1050/520=2.019
T 1 T 2
T m = =754.2
T 1
ln
T 2
Assume Ud=35 Btu/h oF ft2 and, hd=300 Btu/h oF ft2
6
q 2410 Btu/h 2
A o= = =918 f t
U d T m 35Btu/h ft 2 754.2
2
A o =N t Di L=909 f t
2
918f t
N t = =439 tubes
1
ft 8 ft
12
Assuming H2S gas is the tube side fluid and cooling water is the shell side fluid
First trial
TO CALCULATE hI
Calculate Reynolds Number (NRe) to assure turbulent flow for better heat
transfer (assuming one tube pass)
4w p
N =
N
D i( t )
np
4 134688 lb m /h
N = =79,994>10,000
0.782 439
0.075 lbm /(h.ft ) ft ( )
12 1
0.8 1 0.14
hi D i cp
k
=0.023 ( ) ( )( )
DG
k
3
w
0.8 1 0.14
cp
hi =
0.023 ( ) ( )( )
DG
k
3
w
k=
0.8
0.023 ( 79994 ) (1.19 )
1
3
0.0188
Btu
=59
Btu
Di 0.782 h . ft . h . ft
2
.
ft
12
TO CALCULATE hO
w u 346341lbm /h 2
G s= = =432476lb m /hf t
A s 0.801f t 2
From equation 29 page 595, Max Peter, Plant Design and Economics for
Chemical Engineer,
0.6 1
ho D o ao D o G s cp
=
kf F s ( )( )
f k
3
0.6
lb
( )
1 Btu
0.6 1 ft 432476 m2 1 0.0232
ao DoGs c p 3 k f 0.33 12
ho =
Fs
( )( )
f
=
k f Do 1.6
hf t
0.053 lbm ( h. ft )
3
( 1.256 )
1
h. ft .
ft
=195
B
h . ft
12
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
= + + = + +
U o hi h d h o 59 300 195
Btu
U o=39 2
h.f t . F
Relative error=|(35-39)/39|*100=11%
Iteratio 1 2 3
n
U 35 39.3697 41.8803
6 5
Ao 918.414 816.476 767.531
8 6
Nt 439 390 367
G 92089.2 103586. 110192.
4 6 3
NRe 79993.9 89981.2 95719.3
9 5 1
hi 58.9930 64.8151 68.1011
4 4 6
shell 31 31 31
ID
As 0.80083 0.80083 0.80083
3 3 3
Gs 432476 432476 432476
Nres 676928. 676928. 676928.
4 4 4
ho 195.475 195.475 195.475
8 8 8
U 39.3697 41.8803 43.2281
6 5 2
error 0.11099 0.05994 0.03117
3 7 8
A.3. PRESSURE DROP AND POWER CONSUMPTION
CALCULATIONS
2
Bi 2f i Gi Ln p
Pi=
gc i D i i
wi 134688 lbm
Gi= = =109989
A i 0.782 2 2
ft h
4 12 ( ) ( 367 )
( )
lb
N =
Di G i
=
0.782
12( )(
ft 109989 2m
ft h )
=95542
i l bm
0.075
ft .h
From Moody Fanning friction factor chart, for smooth tube, fi =0.0011
( 1 ) 2 ( 0.0011 )( 95542 )2 ( 8 ) (1 ) lb
Pi= =11 2f =0.08 psi
( 32.174 36002 ) ( 0.68 ) 0.782 ( 1 ) f t
( ) 12
f t
3
l b f 1 min 1 hp
power=V Pi=4000 11 2 =1.4 hp
min f t 60 s 550 l b f . ft
s
B o 2 f ' N r G2s
Po=
g c o
x pitch 1.25
T= = =1.25
Do 1
0.11 0.11
bo =0.23+ 1.08
=0.23+ 1.08
=0.72
x
(T )
1 ( 1.251 )
0.15
1
'
f =bo
Do Gs
f
0.15
( ) =0.72
12
(
432476
0.053 ) =0.096
620.096194324762 lbf
Po= =159 =1.1 psi
32.17426002 61.79 f t2
Cooling water pumping power;
wu 346341 f t 3 lb f 1 min 1 hp
power=V Po= Po = 159 2 =0.45 hp
o 61.79 min f t 60 s 550 l bf . ft
s
B. OPTIMIZATION
CT=AoKFCAo+wuHyCu+AoEiHyCi+AoEoHyCo
BASIC ASSUMPTIONS
Do=1
Di=0.782
np=1
pitch= 1.25
Thickness= 0.109
Tubes are laid out on staggered pattern i.e ao=0.33.
tm=754.2
Bi=1
Bo/nb=1
Dc=0.25
Nr Nc/Nt=1
Working hours Hy=8000 h/year
CAo=L.E.20/ft2
Ci=Co=L.E.0.4/kWh
KF=0.2
From equation 33 page 602
x pitch 1.25
T= = =1.25
Do 1
0.11 0.11
bo =0.23+ 1.08
=0.23+ 1.08
=0.72
( x T 1 ) ( 1.251 )
i=Bi
12200 D
1.5 1.83
i i ( )
2 2.33 1.17
g c D o i k i c p i
0.63
w
Let
()
=
1
[ ]
1.5
0.782
=
( ) 12200
( 0.075 )
12
1.83
=0.00466
i
1
32.174 3600 ( ) 0.68 0.0188
2 2 2.33 1.17
0.3
12
[ ]
0.75 4.75 1.42
Bo N r N c 2 bo D c Do F s f
o= o
[ ]
0.75
0.25 1
o=
2 0.72
12
( )( )
12
4.75
1.6 0.053
1.42
=1.0 1 0
8
4.75 2 2 3.17 1.58
0.33 32.174 3600 61.79 0.0232 0.55
0.83
3.5
(
h 2.5 i H i C i +
i opt
3.5 i H y Ci Di R dw hi , opt
Do
+2.9
i Ci D i
D0 ( ) 0.17
( o Co ) H y h0.22 )
i , opt = K F C A 0
Rearranging
1
KFCA
(( )
3.5
hi = 0
0.83
)
opt
3.5 i H y C i Di Rdw hi ,opt i C i Di
2.5 i H i C i+
Do
+2.9
D0 ( ) 0.17 0.22
( o C o ) H y hi ,opt
Equation (45c)
0.17
0.74 i Ci Di
ho =
opt
(
o Co D0 ) 0.78
hi ,opt
1
D0
Uo =op t
( 1
+ +R dw
Di hi , opt ho opt
)
Where Rdw=Rw+Rd=1/hd =1/300, assuming thin walled tube i.e Rw=0
Ci=Co=LE 1.50647x10-7/ft.lbf
KF =0.2
o =0.00466 ,
i=1.010(8)
Using fixed point method, a solution for hi,opt can be found using initial
Guess hi,opt= 68.101Btu/h.ft2.oF
Iteration 0 1 2
hi,opt 68.101 32.170 33.293
ho,opt 224.655 125.160 128.555
Uo,opt 37.648 19.580 20.193
ER(hi,opt)% 1.117 0.034
ER(ho,opt) % 0.795 0.026
ER(Uo,opt) 0.923 0.030
(
hD
Gopt = i i i
ki
0.023 k i C pi i ( )( ) ) 3 wi
i
Gs , opt =
(
ho D o f o Fs k o
k f o ao ( ))
C po o
3
wi
S i,opt =
Gopt
4 n p S i, opt
N t, opt =
D2i
Q
A opt =
U opt T
A 0,opt
Lopt =
D0 N t, opt
Wo
S 0,opt =
G s,opt
0.5
N 3.7
N c ,opt =0.94+ t,opt
0.907( )
From equation (55)
N c ,opt Dc Lopt
nb, opt =
S o,opt
Table A- 3, Calculating optimum parameters
Iteratio 0 1 2
n
Gopt 205091.000 80318.000 83838.000
Si,opt 0.657 1.677 1.607
Nt,opt 197 503 481
Aopt 853.827 1641.739 1591.853
Lopt,ft 16.564 12.473 12.624
Gs,opt 2944647.000 1108587.000 1159263.000
So,opt 0.118 0.312 0.299
Nc,opt 15.532 24.393 23.891
nb,opt 45.000 27.000 27.000
Nre 178154 69769 72827
fi 0.0041 0.0049 0.0049
pi,psi 2.058 0.286 0.308
shell ID 21.250 37.000 37.000
po,psi 352.100 52.891 57.837
From table 7 page 608, Max Peter, Plant Design and Economics for
Chemical Engineer, Do=1, Nt=481, triangular pitch, then shell ID =37,
pitch=1.25, Dc =clearance= pitch-Do= 0.25
NOTES