Some others I feel are of less value.

While perhaps informative as

examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error. Some others I feel are of less value. While perhaps informative as
examples of the "findings" of one magician's experimentation, the
distinction is not always made clear as to what is the author's speculation
and innovation and what actually are the procedures suggested in the
original documents. Then, to make matters even more confusing, the
author presumes to define to the reader what they can expect to
experience, intimating that if they get anything else they are somehow in
error.