Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
com
ScienceDirect
International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology xxx (2017) xxxxxx
www.elsevier.com/locate/IJPRT
Received 26 July 2016; received in revised form 8 December 2016; accepted 6 February 2017
Abstract
This paper concerned with the stabilization of subgrade soil using di erent types of locally available materials such as rice husk ash (RHA),
sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) and cow dung ash (CDA). The RHA, SCBA and CDA were mixed by partial replacement of soil by weight in
0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10% and 12.5%. The natural soil was found as intermediate plastic clay which reduces the dry density and increases the
optimum moisture content after stabilization. The trend of CBR and UCS are increasing and then decreasing, it indi-cates a peak point which
shows an optimum content of ash (7.5). This study shows that there is a significant improvement in CBR, UCS and also able to control the
volumetric change.
2017 Chinese Society of Pavement Engineering. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-
ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.02.001
1996-6814/ 2017 Chinese Society of Pavement Engineering. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Please cite this article in press as: A. Kumar Yadav et al., Stabilization of alluvial soil for subgrade using rice husk ash, sugarcane bagasse ash and cow dung ash
for rural roads, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.02.001
2 A. Kumar Yadav et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology xxx (2017) xxxxxx
Roy Aparna [5] studied the eect of rice husk
load bearing conditions. Therefore, there is a need to ash (RHA) along with cement on the subgrade
design one of the suitable methods of low cost road clayey soil char-acteristics. It was found that with
con-struction. The construction cost can be increase the proportion of rice husk ash and cement,
considerably decreased by selecting locally optimum moisture content and CBR increases
available materials for stabi-lization of the existing whereas maximum dry density decreases. Kumar &
soil. This study includes the stabi-lization of Preethi [8] studied the behaviour of clayey soil
subgrade soil using dierent locally available mixed with rice husk ash and lime and it was
materials such as sugarcane bagasse ash, cow dung
ash and rice husk ash.
2. Literature survey
observed that the maximum improvement in CBR
value is with combination of 6% lime + 10% RHA.
Shrivastava et al. [7] had seen the eect of lime and
RHA on engineer-ing properties of black cotton soil
and found that there is a significant increase in CBR
and UCS strength, whereas optimum moisture
content increases and maximum dry density
decreases. Basha et al. [1] replaced the soil with var-
ious proportions of rice husk ash and cement. It was
found that 68% of cement and 1520% RHA
shows the opti-mum value. Addition of rice husk
ash to the cement stabi-lized soil shows the
significant result in CBR. Chittaranjan et al. [2]
investigated the influence of agricultural wastes in
soil stabilization. Agricultural wastes such as sugar
cane bagasse ash, rice husk ash and groundnut shell
ash are used to stabilize the weak sub grade soil.
Onyelowe [9] carried out experiments on
stabilization of Actuate Lateritic Soil with
Sugarcane bagasse ash and cement. Result of CBR
showed tremendous improvement. Kiran & Kiran
[3] had analysed the strength characteristics of black
cotton soil using bagasse ash as stabilizer. The
strength parameters like CBR, UCS were
determined. It was observed that the blend results of
bagasse ash with dierent percentages of cement for
black cotton soil gave change in density, CBR and
UCS values. Kiran et al. [4] studied the stabiliza-
tion of lateritic soil using sugarcane straw ash and
cement. Sugarcane straw ash was an eective
stabilizer at 6% with 5% of cement for improving
the geotechnical properties of local lateritic soil
sample. Duna Samson et al. [6] inves-tigated the
pozzolanic potential of cow dung ash when used in
concrete by partial replacement of cement at 0, 5,
10, 15, 20, 25 and 30%. It was found that not more
than 15% of cow dung ash could be use to produce
good and quality mortar and concrete.
Table 1
Chemical properties.
SL. No. Component
1 Silica (SiO2)
2 Aluminium Oxide (Al2O3)
3 Iron Oxide (Fe2O3)
4 Calcium Oxide (CaO)
5 Magnesia (MgO)
Please cite this article in press as: A. Kumar Yadav et al., Stabilization of alluvial soil for subgrade using rice husk ash, sugarcane
bagasse ash and cow dung ash for rural roads, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.02.001
Table 2
Physical properties.
Sl.No. Property
1 Colour
2 Specific gravity
3 Liquid limit
4 Plastic limit
5 Optimum moisture content
6 Maximum dry density (gm/
4. Laboratory investigations
Please cite this article in press as: A. Kumar Yadav et al., Stabilization of alluvial soil for subgrade using rice husk ash, sugarcane
bagasse ash and cow dung ash for rural roads, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.02.001
Table 3
Atterbergs Limits in percentage.
100:0
97.5:2.5
95:5
92.5:7.5
90:10
87.5:12.5
14
12
10
0
0
Percentage replacement of soil with ash
25
20
15
10
0
0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5
Percentage replacement of soil with ash
Please cite this article in press as: A. Kumar Yadav et al., Stabilization of alluvial soil for subgrade using rice husk ash, sugarcane
bagasse ash and cow dung ash for rural roads, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.02.001
A. Kumar Yadav et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology xxx (2017) xxxxxx
shows there is no significant change in plasticity index with an increase in percentage contribution of ash.
the increase in mix proportion and decrease in quantity of free silt, clay fraction and coarser materials with
large formation of surface area. This process needs water to take place which means more water is needed in
order to com-pact the soilash mix.
Fig. 4 shows the variation in the maximum dry density of the stabilized soil, with using dierent
proportions of ashes. It has been seen that the dry density decreases and the optimum moisture content
increases as the proportion of dierent ashes increases. The decrease in maximum dry density may be due to
the addition of ash with a lower specific gravity than the soil.
1.66
1.64
1.62
1.6
1.58
1.56
1.54
1.52
1.5
1.48
0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5
Percentage replacement of soil with ash
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5
Percentage replacement of soil with ash
Please cite this article in press as: A. Kumar Yadav et al., Stabilization of alluvial soil for subgrade using rice husk ash, sugarcane
bagasse ash and cow dung ash for rural roads, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.02.001
6 A. Kumar Yadav et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology xxx (2017) xxxxxx
18.83%, 16.24% and 13.67% for RHA, SCBA and
4.3. Strength characteristics CDA respectively.
Soaked CBR characteristics of natural soil as
4.3.1. CBR test well as sta-bilized soil are shown in the Fig. 6. It has
The CBR test for natural soil and stabilized soil been observed that the soaked CBR increases and
was car-ried out as per IS: 2720 (Part-16) in both then decreases with an increase in proportion of the
soaked and unsoaked conditions to evaluate their dierent ash. The increase in the soaked CBR up to
load bearing capac-ity. The unsoaked CBR 7.5% ash content can be attributed to the gradual
characteristics are shown in the Fig. 5. It has been formation of cementitious compounds between the
observed that the unsoaked CBR increases then ashes and calcium hydroxide contained in the soil.
decreases with an increase in the proportion of the The decrease in the soaked CBR after 7.5% ash
dierent ash. The increase in unsoaked CBR may be content may be due to excess ash that was not
due to the formation of calcium silicates after mobilized in the reac-tion, which consequently
reaction of silica from ash and calcium from soil. occupies spaces within the sample and therefore
Afterwards the unsoaked CBR decreases as the reducing bond in the soilash mixtures. Max-imum
excess of silica does not react with calcium. The soaked CBR is 7.68%, 5.88% and 4.87% for RHA,
maximum unsoaked CBR was achieved at 7.5% of SCBA and CDA respectively at 7.5% of ash content.
ash. The maximum CBR value is
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5
Percentage replacement of soil with ash
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5
Percentage replacement of soil with ash
A. Kumar Yadav et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology xxx (2017) xxxxxx
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
10-30 30-60 60-100 100-200 200-300 300-600 600-1000 1000-1500 1500-2000
Load (ESAL in thousands)
5. Conclusions
Please cite this article in press as: A. Kumar Yadav et al., Stabilization of alluvial soil for subgrade using rice husk ash, sugarcane
bagasse ash and cow dung ash for rural roads, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.02.001
8 A. Kumar Yadav et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology xxx (2017) xxxxxx
References
at peak point when stabilized with RHA, SCBA
and CDA is increased by 134%, 79.81% and [1] E.A. Basha, R. Hashim, H.B. Mahmud, A.S. Muntohar,
48.92% respec-tively when compared to Stabilization of residual soil with rice husk ash and cement,
Constr. Build. Mater. 19 (2005) 448453.
unstabilized soil.
[2] M. Chittaranjan, M. Vijay, D. Keerthi, Agricultural wastes as
5. A similar trend of the CBR was obtained for soil stabilizers, in: Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng. 4 (6) (2011) 5051.
UCS. The value of UCS at peak point when [3] R.G. Kiran, L. Kiran, Analysis of strength characteristics of
stabilized with RHA, SCBA and CDA is Black cotton soil using Bagasse ash and additives as
increased by 45.94%, 27% and 38.51% stabilizer, in: Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 7 (2013) 22402246.
respectively when compared to unstabilized soil. [4] S.P. Kiran, A.N. Ramakrishna, H.R. Shrinivas, Stabilization of
lateritic soil by using sugarcane straw ash and cement, J. Civil
6. On the basis of maximum CBR and UCS value, Eng. Technol. Res. 2 (2014) 615620.
the ash content for stabilization is obtained as [5] Aparna Roy, Soil stabilization using rice husk ash and cement,
optimum value i.e.7.5%. At this value there is in: Int. J. Civil Eng. Res. 5 (1) (2014) 4954.
relatively low dry density and high moisture [6] Duna Samson, Omoniyi Tope Moses, Investigating the
pozzolonic potential of cow dung ash in cement paste and
content that will be helpful in con-trolling the
mortar, in: Civil Eng. Res. 6 (8) (2014) 110118.
volumetric changes. Hence, this optimum value [7] Dilip Shrivastava, A.K. Singhai, R.K. Yadav, Eect of lime
may be considered for stabilization of soil for and rice husk ash on engineering properties of black cotton
sub-grade construction. soil, Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 3 (2) (2014) 292296.
7. Thickness implication indicates that there is a [8] B. Suneel Kumar, T.V. Preethi, Behavior of Clayey Soil
Stabilized with Rice Husk Ash & Lime, Int. J. Eng. Trend
significant reduction in thickness while using ash Technol. 11 (1) (2014) 4448.
stabilized soil for subgrade construction. Hence, [9] Ken C. Onyelowe, Cement stabilized Akwuete lateritic soil
this will economize the cost of construction. and the use of bagasse ash as admixture, Int. J. Sci. Eng.
8. Comparatively priority may be given in this Investig. 1 (2012) 1620, Paper ID: 10212-05.
sequence to RHA, SCBA and then CDA for
stabilization of soil. CDA is not a very good
stabilizer but can still be used to improve the
engineering properties of alluvial soil.
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53] Please cite this article in press as: A. Kumar Yadav et al., Stabilization of alluvial soil for subgrade using rice husk ash, sugarcane bagasse
ash and cow dung ash for rural roads, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.02.001