Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
http://spi.sagepub.com
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Additional services and information for School Psychology International can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://spi.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations http://spi.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/28/2/179
Introduction
The interactive paradigm, encompassing both situational and disposi-
tional factors has become increasingly popular and has proved to be
useful in research (see Carver et al., 1989; Endler and Parker, 1999;
Wrzesniewski, 1996; Wrzesniewski and W!odarczyk, 2001; Zeidner,
1995). This approach, however, encounters difficulties when empirical
verification of both groups of variables is required. One of the questions
to answer is the selection of appropriate measurement techniques.
179
180
181
182
183
School-related Gender,
Present life
stressful personality and
situation
situation other stable
individual traits
COPING COPING
STRATEGY STYLE
184
185
Form A Form B
Item Factor II Loadings Item Factor II Loadings
Form A Form B
Item Factor III Loadings Item Factor III Loadings
186
also differ with respect to grammatical form. Both forms of the CSSQ
consist of 42 items. New items were substituted for the ones which did
not conform with the theoretical scales. The questionnaires, thus
prepared, were administered to 696 1st-grade high-school pupils (393
girls and 303 boys), aged 1516 from five secondary schools in Warsaw.
In between the completion of the first and the second questionnaire
pupils were given the Marlow-Crown Social Desirability Scale and the
BWZ Questionnaire measuring Type A behaviour pattern (these data
were analysed elsewhere). Half of the participants filled in Form A of
the CSSQ first and Form B second, the other half filled in the question-
naires in the opposite order.
The responses were factor-analysed (Varimax rotation), with a limi-
tation to three factors (three types of coping), separately for boys and
girls. As in the previous studies, the criteria of inclusion in a factor
were a factor loading of 0.35 or more and negative or low loadings on
the remaining factors.
Table 1 provides a comparison of positive loadings for girls on Forms
A and B on each of the three factors. It can be seen that a considerable
degree of concordance occurs with the exception of items 4, 5, 11, 21, 35.
A similar comparison for boys of factor loadings on Forms A and B is
shown in Table 2. Here a slightly different strength of effect is shown
on factors two and three. The slightly weaker loadings here are seen on
items 5, 11, 21, 32. Table 3 provides the factor loadings for the whole
group taken together on Forms A and B.
The next step was to compare empirically derived scales with theo-
retical ones. We acquired full concordance between empirical Factor
one and a scale theoretically defined as Task-oriented coping. Nine out
of ten items on Factor two were consistent with the theoretical scale
defined as emotion-orieted coping.
The final three scales of the CSSQ are presented in Appendix 1. Each
scale is scored separately by summing up the reponse weights accord-
ing to the scoring key.
Conducted correlation analysis confirm also considerable independ-
ence of the scales.
Correlation between scales coefficients obtained separately for girls
and boys, in Form A and Form B are low and range from 0.017 to
0.286.
Correlational analyses were also conducted for the purpose of the
assessment of the possible social desirability bias. The obtained coeffi-
cients between three scales of the CSSQ and the Marlow-Crown Social
Desirability Scale range from 0.06 to 0.20. These findings confirm
that the responses in both forms of the CSSQ are not biased by social
desirability.
187
Form A Form B
Item Factor II Loadings Item Factor II Loadings
Form A Form B
Item Factor III Loadings Item Factor III Loadings
188
Table 3 Factorial analysis of the CSSQ, Form A and Form B, for the
entire group, n = 696
Form A Form B
Item Factor I Loadings Item Factor I Loadings
Form A Form B
Item Factor II Loadings Item Factor II Loadings
Form A Form B
Item Factor III Loadings Item Factor III Loadings
189
Table 4
Gender CSSQ. Form A CSSQ. Form B
190
Notes
Support for this work was partly provided by the Department of Psychology,
Warsaw University, grant number 1695/15.
1. The data were partly collected within the Master thesis of H. Zalewska.
191
References
Boekaerts, M. (1996) Coping with Stress in Childhood and Adolescence, in M.
Zeidner and N. S. Endler (eds) Handbook of Coping, pp.45284. New York:
John Wiley and Sons.
Blount, R. L., Landolf-Fritsche, B., Powers, S.W. and Sturges, J.W. (1991)
Differences Between High and Low Coping Children and Between Parent
and Staff Behaviours During Painful Medical Procedures, Journal of
Pediatric Psychology 16: 795809.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. and Weintraub, J. K. (1989) Assessing Coping
Strategies: A Theoretically Based Approach, Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology 56: 267283.
Compas, B. E., Phares, V. and Ledoux, N. (1989) Stress and Coping Preventive
Interventions for Children and Young Adolescents, in L. A. Bond and B. E.
Compas (eds) Primary Preventions and Promotion in the Schools, pp. 319
41. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Endler, N. S. and Parker, J. D. A. (1994) Assessment of Multidimensional
Coping: Task, Emotion and Avoidance Strategies, Psychological Assessment
6: 50-60.
Endler, N. S. and Parker, J. D. A. (1999) Coping Inventory for Stressful Situa-
tions (CISS): Manual (Revised Edition). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R., Dunkel-Schetter, C., De Longis, A. and Gruben, R. J.
(1986) Dynamics of Stressful Encounters: Cognitive Appraisal, Coping and
Encounter Outcomes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:
9921003.
Frydenberg, E. and Lewis, R. (1991) Adolescent Coping: The Different Ways in
Which Boys and Girls Cope, Journal of Adolescence 14: 11933.
Gror, M. W., Thomas, S. P. and Shoffner, D. (1992) Adolescent Stress and
Coping: A Longitudinal Study, Research in Nursing and Health 15: 20917.
Lohman, B. J. and Jarvis, P. A. (2000) Adolescents Stressors, Coping Strate-
gies, and Psychological Health Studied in The Family Context, Journal of
Youth and Adolescents 29: 1543.
Kulik, A. and Szewczyk, L. (2003) Radzenie sobie ze stresem u nastolatkw z
.
rznym poziomem zmeczenia [Coping Among Adolescents with Different
Levels of Fatigue], in Z. Juczynski and N. Oginska-Bulik (eds) Zasoby
osobiste i spo eczne sprzyjaja ce zdrowiu jednostki, pp. 17695. "dz,:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu "dzkiego.
Lazarus, R. S. (1980) The Stress and Coping Paradigm, in L. A. Bond and J. C.
Rosen (eds) Competence and Coping During Adulthood, pp. 2874. Hanover:
University Press of New England.
Lazarus, R. S. (1993) Coping Theory and Research: Past, Present and Future,
Psychosomatic Medicine 55: 23447.
Lazarus, R. S. and Folkman, S. (1984) Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York:
Springer.
Lazarus, R. S. and Folkman, S. (1987) Transactional Theory and Research on
Emotions and Coping, European Journal of Personality 1: 14169.
Ryan, N. M. (1989) Stress-Coping Strategies Identified From School Age Chil-
drens Perspective, Research in Nursing and Health 12: 11122.
Samdal, O., Nutbeam, D. Wold, B. and Lkannas L. (1998) Achieving Health
192
193
Appendix 1
Item
number Task-oriented coping
Emotion-oriented coping
Avoidance-oriented coping
1 I listen to music
5 I watch TV
11 I sleep more
14 I go to the cinema
16 I go shopping, buy myself something I like
21 I miss classes
24 I watch films on the video
27 I drink beer, wine or liquor
33 I socialize
36 I spend time with my sweetheart
42 I joke and retain my sense of humor
194