Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
June 6, 2017
7:00 PM
City Hall 129 Holmes St.
Page 1 of 161
4. D.2. *Approval of Taproom, Sunday On-Sale and Small Brewery License for the
Shakopee Brew Hall
4. D.3. *Approval of On-Sale and Sunday On-Sale Liquor License for Sapporos
4. D.4. *Approval of 2017-2018 Liquor License Renewals
4. D.5. *Policy Statement Supporting Local Decision Making Authority
4. D.6. *Shakopee Chamber of Commerce request for Rhythm on the Rails Event
5. RECOGNITION OF INVOLVED CITIZENS BY CITY COUNCIL - Provides an
opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda.
Comments should not be more than five minutes in length. The Mayor may adjust that
time limit based upon the number of persons seeking to comment. This comment
period may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to
make political endorsements or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will
not enter into a dialogue with citizens, and questions from Council will be for
clarification only. This period will not be used to problem solve issues or to react to
the comments made, but rather for informational purposes only.
6. Business removed from consent will be discussed at this time
7. General Business
A. Planning and Development
7. A.1. Authorize Solicitation of Bids for Downtown Improvements
7. A.2. Final Plat for Lennar Homes of Ridge Creek First Addition
B. Personnel
7. B.1. Reclassification of City Engineer/Public Works Director
C. General Administration
7. C.1. Employment of City Engineer and Director of Public Works
8. Reports
8.A. Liaison and Administration
8.B. City Bill List
9. Other Business
10. Adjournment to June 20, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.
Page 2 of 161
4.A.1.
The purpose of an EAW is to identify potential environmental impacts associated with the
project and determine whether or not an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is needed.
The EAW analyzes a variety of topics including land use, geology, stormwater, wildlife
habitat, traffic, water use, wastewater generation, cultural resources, and noise. Analysis is
based on guidance provided by the Environmental Quality Board, who oversees the
Minnesota Environmental Review program. An overview of some of the information in the
EAW is summarized below:
The area is highly susceptible to groundwater contamination and is within the citys
Page 3 of 161
Drinking Water Supply Management Area. Therefore, infiltration is not anticipated to be
used to treat stormwater for the area.
Wastewater will be directed to the Blue Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant. There is
capacity to accommodate the additional wastewater from the project.
Two rare features the loggerhead shrike (an endangered bird) and the gopher snake were
identified by the DNR to be known in the area. The project will need to take mitigation
measures into account during development of the project to address threatened and
endangered species.
The project will generate additional traffic in the area. Mitigation measures to address the
increased traffic have been identified in the EAW.
The developer and City Staff have worked together to complete the EAW. The next step is
for the EAW to be submitted to the review agencies and public for a 30-day comment period.
Once the comment period is complete, the City will develop responses to comments and
determine if an EIS is needed.
The item for the City Council is to authorize distribution of the EAW to the review agencies
to start the 30-day comment period. If authorized, the EAW will be submitted for public
comment June 19-July 19, 2017. This can be authorized via a motion to authorize distribution
of the EAW for public comment.
Budget Impact:
No budget impact.
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 4 of 161
Page 5 of 161
Canterbury Park
Shakopee, MN
Environmental Assessment Worksheet
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Appendix A: Figures
Appendix B: Agency Correspondence
Appendix C: Geotechnical Report
Appendix D: Phase I Report
Appendix E: Traffic Report
Page 6 of 161
July 2013 version
If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): 4410.4300;
Subpart 19(d) Residential development and Subpart 32 Mixed residential and industrial-commercial
projects
5. Project Location:
County: Scott
City/Township: Shakopee
PLS Location (, , Section, Township, Range): NE S8, T115N, R22W and SW , SE S5,
T115N, R22W
Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Lower Minnesota River
GPS Coordinates:
Tax Parcel Number: 274500100, 274500050, 274500090, 274500010, 279080681, 279080411
page 1
Page 7 of 161
At a minimum attach each of the following to the EAW:
County map (Figure 1) showing the general location of the project;
U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute (Figure 2), 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries
(photocopy acceptable); and
Site plans (Figure 3) showing all significant project and natural features. Pre-construction site
plan and post-construction site plan.
6. Project Description:
a. Provide the brief project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50
words).
The project proposes the development of residential and commercial oriented uses adjacent to
Canterbury Park along with public street and utility improvements in the City of Shakopee. The
project includes development of approximately 856 residential units (700 apartments and 156
townhomes), 93,000 square feet of commercial uses (retail, restaurant and entertainment), and a 120
room hotel.
b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including
infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility.
Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical
manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment
or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures,
and 4) timing and duration of construction activities.
The project proposes the development of residential and commercial oriented uses and public street
and utility improvements in the City of Shakopee. The project site is located on the north side of
Eagle Creek Boulevard, west of County Highway 83, adjacent to Canterbury Park. The project
includes development of approximately 856 residential units (700 apartments and 156 townhomes),
93,000 square feet of commercial uses (retail, restaurant and entertainment), and a 120 room hotel.
Refer to Figure 3 in Appendix A.
As part of this project, Shenandoah Drive is proposed to be extended from its current terminus at
Eastway Avenue/Barenscheer Boulevard to the intersection of Vierling Drive and 12th Avenue East.
The two lane extension will include access to the proposed residential and commercial development
using roundabouts and minor-street stop controls. The road extension will include a pathway that will
provide connections to existing pedestrian trail networks.
The development is planned to be constructed in multiple phases with Phase I consisting of all
Shenandoah Drive improvements and a 350 unit apartment complex with a target opening year of
2020. The apartment complex will consist of two, three-story buildings connected by a central
clubhouse with pool. All other development components would be completed as part of future phases
with a target completion year of 2025.
The majority of the project site is vacant and undeveloped, but is utilized annually for Severs Fall
Festival and Corn Maze which will be relocated to an offsite location. The southwest corner of the
project site is in use as a farmstead and is not owned or operated by the project proposer. Any
development on this portion of the site would be dependent on future property ownership.
page 2
Page 8 of 161
Development on this portion of the site is included in this EAW to assess all potential environmental
impacts of full project buildout for the purpose of making future planning decisions.
Construction of the project will result in land disturbance totaling approximately 68.5 acres and will
create approximately 35 acres of new impervious surfaces. Construction of the proposed project is
anticipated to include:
Site preparation for building pads and pavement including excavation and grading.
Excavation for footing, utilities and stormwater retention basins.
Paving of roadways, sidewalks, and parking areas.
c. Project magnitude:
d. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the
need for the project and identify its beneficiaries.
The purpose of the project is to provide housing and commercial oriented services to accommodate an
increasing population in the City of Shakopee as well as persons visiting the area. The project will
benefit future and current city residents and visitors.
e. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or
likely to happen? Yes No
If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for
environmental review.
Continued redevelopment of the Canterbury Park site is always a possibility, but any such changes in
land use on the adjacent site would be reviewed as required by the City of Shakopee, and if necessary,
a separate environmental review may be required to be completed as a part of a future redevelopment
project.
page 3
Page 9 of 161
7. Cover types: Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after
development:
8. Permits and approvals required: List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals,
certifications and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits,
governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including
bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are
prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules,
Chapter 4410.3100.
page 4
Page 10 of 161
Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item
Nos. 9-18, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No. 19.
If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information requested
in EAW Item No. 19
9. Land use:
a. Describe:
i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks,
trails, prime or unique farmlands.
The majority of the project site is vacant with a vegetative land cover that is utilized annually for
Severs Fall Festival and Corn Maze. Small wooden carnival structures consisting of food and
beverage sale booths, carnival games, and performance stages remain onsite throughout the year. The
northern portion of the site contains gravel parking and drive areas that are used occasionally during
concerts and other events at Canterbury Park. The southeast portion of the site is currently being used
as a staging area for the adjacent power plant construction. The area consists of a gravel parking lot
that is being used to stage equipment and a job trailer until construction activities are complete. The
southwest corner of the project site is in use as a farmstead, and is not owned or operated by the
project proposer.
High density residential development is located directly west and adjacent to the project site.
Canterbury Park, an entertainment venue that offers a casino, horse-racing events, and host concerts
and other activities throughout the year, is located adjacent and east of the project site. The Upper
Valley Drainageway System is located against and to the west of the site (refer to Figure 4 in
Appendix A). A power plant is currently under construction in southeast quadrant of the intersection
of Eagle Creek Boulevard and Veirling Drive.
No unique resources or corridors are located on the project site. Pedestrian trails are located adjacent
to the project site along Eagle Creek Boulevard, Alysheba Road, and Shenandoah Drive. The site is
less than a mile south of the Minnesota River and the Minnesota Valley State Trail. The Minnesota
River corridor provides recreation opportunities with pedestrian and bicycle trails and water access
points.
ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any
other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional,
state, or federal agency.
The City of Shakopee Comprehensive Plan designates the project site as Entertainment (E). The City
of Shakopee conducts the surface water quality permitting activities on behalf of the Lower
Minnesota River Watershed District within the city.
iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and
scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc.
The project site is currently zoned Major Recreation (MR). The purpose of the MR zone is to create
opportunity for large amusement and recreation attractions with a regional draw, with land use
compatibility and street efficiency. There are no shoreland or floodplain overlays.
page 5
Page 11 of 161
b. Discuss the projects compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a
above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects.
The proposed residential components would be consistent with the residential land uses located
adjacent and west of the project site. The Shenandoah Drive extension will provide a buffer between
the new residential uses and Canterbury Park. Eagle Creek Boulevard will serve as a buffer between
existing residential uses to the south and the proposed hotel, restaurant, and retail uses.
Restaurants are a permitted, conditional, and Planned Unit Development (PUD) use allowed under the
Major Recreation zoning. Hotel and retail are conditional and PUD uses under the Major Recreation
zoning. A Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay does allow for single use and mixed use
residential development in this zone. The majority of the project site does not lie within the approved
PUD for Canterbury Park. A new PUD for the 700-unit apartment project is anticipated to be
submitted to the City concurrently with the EAW, the remainder of the development will be
submitted to the City at a future date as needed.
The Comprehensive Plan states that the area of land adjacent to Canterbury Park has been reserved
for expansion and spin-off uses. The Comprehensive Plan goes on to state that the intent of the Major
Recreation zone is to accommodate recreation and associated uses. The Comprehensive Plan does not
exclude any of the uses proposed for the project and the project does not require a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment.
c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential incompatibility
as discussed in Item 9b above.
The project will incorporate landscaping and setbacks to provide buffers between uses as needed. The
proposed uses are compatible with existing zoning as permitted, conditional, and PUD uses as noted
above. A PUD will be submitted to the City for approval.
Surficial geologic deposits are classified as grey Cloud terrace. Bedrock beneath the site consists of
the Prairie du Chien Group limestone formation which is predominantly dolomitic limestone and
dolomite. A geotechnical evaluation was prepared in February 2017 for the portion of the site where
the apartments for Phase I will be developed and is included in Appendix C. The results of this report
are assumed to generally represent the entirety of the site for the purposes of this EAW, however,
additional geotechnical investigations can be completed for future development phases if deemed
needed by the City. The study characterizes subsurface conditions for the purposes of underground
utility siting and subgrade preparation requirements for foundations, floor slabs, exterior slabs, and
pavements. Soil borings and test pits were conducted onsite. Topsoil onsite ranges in thickness from
half a foot to three and a half feet. Bedrock deposits were found within 2 feet of the surface.
Recommendations from this report will be incorporated into engineering and design as needed.
page 6
Page 12 of 161
A SWPPP will be implemented during construction as part of the NPDES permit requirements for the
project. The SWPPP will list all best management practices that will be utilized to minimize impacts
to groundwater from project development.
b. Soils and topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and
descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions
relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly
permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading.
Discuss impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational
activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after project construction
to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections or other measures.
Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to
Item 11.b.ii.
The project site is level or gently sloping and does not contain any hydric soils as shown in the soil
characteristics table below. Refer to Figure 5 in Appendix A.
A SWPPP will be implemented during construction as part of the NPDES permit requirements for the
project. The SWPPP will list all best management practices that will be utilized to minimize erosion
and sedimentation from the site during construction.
There is one potential wetland within the project site that has been identified through an aerial photo
review and will need to be field verified in the future. It is located in a depression towards the
southeast end of the site. There is a 24-inch pipe, whose invert is approximately 18 inches higher than
the basin low point, which exits to the northeast. This basin is charged through overland flow. This
potential wetland is identified on NWI mapping as a PEM1A (Palustrine, Emergent, Persistent,
Temporarily flooded) wetland. Refer to Figure 6 in Appendix A. No DNR public waters are located
on or adjacent to the project site (refer to Figure 7 in Appendix A).
page 7
Page 13 of 161
There is a wooded depression along the northwest edge of the site which is currently used for
stormwater storage. There is a 30-inch pipe, whose invert is approximately 36 higher than the basin
low point, which exits to the east. This basin is charged through overland flow.
A drainage feature called the Upper Valley Drainageway System (shown in Figure 4) is located near
the western edge of the project site. It enters the site from the south via culvert beneath Eagle Creek
Boulevard and travels north until it reaches about the midpoint of the site, on the west side, where it
then turns to the northwest and continues offsite. This ditch system drains numerous portions of the
City of Shakopee and directs flow towards a pretreatment area and eventually to the Minnesota River.
The Minnesota River lies within a mile of the Project Site and has been listed by the MPCA as an
impaired waterbody. The river is impaired for mercury in fish tissue, mercury in the water column,
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in fish tissue, and turbidity.
Groundwater was not encountered during the soil borings and test pits conducted for the geotechnical
evaluation included in Appendix C. The project site is located within the wellhead protection area and
the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) for the City of Shakopee. Do to the
proximity and type of bedrock, groundwater is highly vulnerable to contamination from land use
activities. Karst conditions are possible and infiltration is not recommended or proposed to manage
stormwater from the site.The MDH County Well Index did not identify any wells on the project site.
If any wells are encountered they will be sealed in accordance with MDH requirements.
b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate
the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below.
i. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition
of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the
site.
1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any
pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and
waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal
wastewater infrastructure.
The proposed development will generate wastewater typically associated with residential households
as well as commercial type facilities such as retail shopping and restaurants. Wastewater will be
conveyed to the Blue Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) via the City of Shakopee sanitary
sewer system.
It is estimated that the proposed development will generate an average of 309,615 gallons per day
(GPD). This estimate is based on equivalent Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) values, and unit
parameters, taken from Met Council SAC Procedure Manual (2017) and illustrated in the table below.
Wastewater from the proposed development will be conveyed via new sanitary sewer pipe, installed
page 8
Page 14 of 161
and connected as part of the development, to the existing public sanitary sewer main line located at
the east property line.
The Blue Lake WWTP has an average wastewater design flow of capacity of 42 million GPD and has
seen an average inflow value of 26.73 million GPD over a recent 12 month period (Metropolitan
Council Inflow Summary Report dated January 2017).
The City of Shakopee has indicated that the existing sanitary sewer system was designed and
constructed to include wastewater flows generated by future developments within the area of the
proposed development. Wastewater generated by the proposed development will not require
modification of the existing wastewater infrastructure or treatment plant.
No wastewater will be discharged to a subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS). All wastewater
generated by the proposed development will be conveyed to the Blue Lake WWTP.
Wastewater from the proposed development will be treated at the Blue Lake WWTP. The plant
provides mechanical, biological, and chemical treatment to the wastewater before discharging it into
the Minnesota River. There are no groundwater or surface water impacts anticipated from the
wastewater produced by the proposed development.
page 9
Page 15 of 161
ii. Stormwater - Describe the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the site prior to
and post construction. Include the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the
site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss
any environmental effects from stormwater discharges. Describe stormwater pollution
prevention plans including temporary and permanent runoff controls and potential BMP
site locations to manage or treat stormwater runoff. Identify specific erosion control,
sedimentation control or stabilization measures to address soil limitations during and
after project construction.
The proposed project site is tributary to the Minnesota River and lies within two sub-watersheds, Mill
Pond and Blue Lake, of the City of Shakopees Sub-watershed Delineation Map (Figure III-4) of the
Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (January 2012).
The City of Shakopee Water Resource Management Plan (WRMP) applies Nationwide Urban Run-
off Program (NURP) Standards for the design of new stormwater management ponds and the use of
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agencys Best Management Practices (BMPs) for all proposed
developments to reduce non-point source pollution associated with stormwater run-off.
The majority of existing site runoff would be from the current farmstead and previously farmed areas
with the exception of a small northerly portion of the site which is currently a paved and/or gravel
parking lot, and the southeast portion of the project site which has most recently been used a gravel
lay down area for staging purposes related to the offsite construction of the new power plant to the
west.
The type of run-off generated by the existing farmstead, and previous agricultural area, is typical
pasture and previously farmed land (i.e. residual fertilizer, herbicide, pesticide, sediment from tilling
and planting, etc). The stormwater run-off generated by this area is directed to a large centrally
located depression where it is infiltrated.
The existing parking areas to the north, and the gravel construction staging area at the southeast, drain
to a subsurface storm sewer system which leads to an existing stormwater management system
located on the adjacent Canterbury Park property where it is treated prior to discharge via an existing
42 storm sewer pipe to the Upper Valley Drainage Way System which drains northwest to the
Minnesota River approximately 1.5-miles away.
The proposed development must provide a stormwater management system which provides water
quality treatment, as well as water quantity and rate control, in compliance with the Citys WRMP.
Water quality treatment must meet NURP guidelines; however, the City will accept other treatment
methods on a case-by-case basis. Due to excavation difficulties inherent with the existing shallow
bedrock found throughout the project site, the proposed development will consist of a series of wet
ponds and dry ponds which shall meet or exceed the required water quality treatment through wet
detention in accordance with City standards and/or filtration in accordance with accepted practices
such as media and vegetative filters as specified in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual.
Attempts to reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff in accordance with the Citys WRMP, as well as
the MPCA General Permit, through the use of infiltration is prohibited due to the presence of shallow
page 10
Page 16 of 161
bedrock, potential karst soils, and the identification of a majority of the site being located within the
Citys Drinking Water Supply Management Area.
Rate control will be provided in accordance with the Citys WRMP which allows a maximum
discharge rate of 1/3 CFS per acre of newly developed land for areas of land tributary to the
Minnesota River via within the Mill Pond Subcatchment Area, and 1/10 CFS per acre of newly
developed land for areas within the Blue Lake Subcatchment Area. However, the Citys WRMP
allows the maximum peak discharge rate to be waived to the extents necessary to be limited to no less
than the area of an 8-inch opening, and/or allow the outlet to be sized to allow the detention area to
draw down to within one foot of the normal run-out elevation within the 72-hour following the onset
of a 100-year rainfall event.
The proposed project site will require approximately 17.6 AC-FT of storage to meet the allowable
discharge rate requirements of the Citys WRMP for the portion of the project tributary to Mill Pond
Subcatchment and approximately 3.0 AC-FT of storage to meet the allowable discharge rate
requirements of the Citys WRMP for the portion of the project tributary to the Blue Lake
Subcatchment which will be included as part the stormwater management designs for development
plan approval. Future phases will require additional assessment of surface water management system
needs and will comply with all applicable rules and regulations.
Erosion control measures during construction will include BMPs as required by the City of Shakopee,
the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, and the NPDES requirements. Temporary erosion
control measures may include:
Rock entrances
Silt fence
Biorolls
Erosion control mats and wood fiber blankets (as required)
Inlet Protection
Rock check dams
Temporary seeding and mulching
Temporary sedimentation basins (as required)
page 11
Page 17 of 161
iii. Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or
groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and
purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe
any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the
wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal
water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including
an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Identify any measures to
avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation.
Groundwater was not encountered during soil borings and test pits. The project is not anticipated to
encounter water during construction or operation and therefore, need for a water appropriation permit
is not anticipated. However, groundwater levels can fluctuate in response to rainfall, flooding,
irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications, and other factors. Project
planning will anticipate fluctuations and an appropriation permit will be obtained as needed.
It is anticipated that the one wetland onsite will be removed and replaced through mitigation banking.
This wetland may have been created to assist in stormwater management and may be considered as an
incidental wetland. Its contribution to the stormwater management of the area has been accounted for
in the stormwater management plan for the site. A delineation will be completed and reviewed and
approved as applicable. Final assessment of impact and replacement of the wetland will be completed
as part of the permitting process.
The wooded depression on the north end of the site will be removed and its stormwater management
functions will be accounted for by a stormwater pond at the north end of the site. No Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designated floodplains are located on the site.
page 12
Page 18 of 161
The Upper Valley Drainageway System has no impacts proposed and will be avoided during future
development.
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared for the project site by Wenck and
Associates and is included in Appendix D. The ESA identifies environmental conditions and
historical conditions on the site related to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substance
or petroleum product in, on or near the site, including any past release that has been addressed in
accordance with applicable requirements. The ESA included all project parcels currently owned by
the project proposer but does not include the farmstead parcels located on the southwest corner of the
project site. The ESA included records retrieval and review of records, site reconnaissance, and
interviews of people with knowledge of the site.
Historic use of the site indicates it was vacant agricultural cropland and farmstead until about 1993
after which the Corn Maze began utilizing the property. The historic uses for the majority of the
project site show no evidence of a release or material threat of a release of petroleum products or
hazardous materials. The ESA did identify that the farmstead on the project site was enrolled in the
Petroleum Brownfields Program for a non-tank related petroleum release. Contamination to
groundwater or off-site was not reported. Phase I and Phase II ESAs were prepared for the farmstead
portion of the site and the MPCA granted a regulatory closure of their investigation. Due to the lack
of groundwater and off-site contamination reported this site was determined to not be a regulatory
environmental condition for the rest of the project site. However, if this portion of the site is
developed further assessment may be required. Additionally, other nearby sites of regulatory interest
including Canterbury Park, a registered Concentrated Animal Feedlot Operation, were found to have
material threat of release to the project site.
b. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored during
construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential
environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify measures to
avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including
source reduction and recycling.
Construction of the proposed project will result in the generation of solid waste and construction
waste material. All waste and unused building materials will be properly disposed of off-site.
During project operation, municipal solid waste will be hauled away by a local, licensed garbage
hauler and new residential and commercial tenants will be encouraged to recycle.
page 13
Page 19 of 161
Indicate the number, location and size of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or
other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of
hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the
use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include
development of a spill prevention plan.
During construction and operation of the project vehicles containing gasoline will be present on site.
Minimal amounts of gasoline may be stored on site, in approved containers with secondary leak
protection. Toxic or hazardous materials present after construction will be consistent with residential
and commercial uses and may include pesticides and herbicides. The potential for contamination is
considered to be low. No above or below ground tanks are proposed to be stored onsite following
construction.
Construction of the project will not involve the generation of significant amounts of hazardous waste.
Hazardous waste generated will be properly disposed of. The anticipated land uses proposed for the
project site will may generate or require the storage of business type hazardous waste materials onsite
and would be typical of residential, retail, and restaurant uses.
13. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features):
a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site.
The site is has some vegetative cover, some gravel parking areas, and some structures. The site is located
in the vicinity of the Minnesota River wildlife corridor. The surrounding area includes developed areas as
well as vacant land and land in agricultural use.
b. Describe rare features such as state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native
plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other
sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement
number (LA-____) and/or correspondence number (ERDB 20170287) from which the data were
obtained and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or
species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the results.
No areas of biodiversity significance are located on or adjacent to the project site (refer to Figure 8 in
Appendix A). The DNRs Natural Heritage Information System was reviewed for the presence of
State-listed threatened, endangered, or special concern species within an approximate one-mile radius
of the site. The DNR identified two rare features, the loggerhead shrike and the gopher snake, in
correspondence dated March 27, 2017, included in Appendix B. The loggerhead shrike is state-listed
endangered bird that was documented breeding the project area in 1994. Loggerhead shrike can be
found in native prairie, pastures, old fields and orchards, cemeteries, grassy roadsides, and farmyards.
The project site and surrounding area does contain suitable habitat so it is possible that the loggerhead
shrike could breed in the area. The gopher snake, a state-listed species of special concern, has been
page 14
Page 20 of 161
documented in the project area and could be found onsite. The gopher snake prefers dry, sandy or
bluff prairies and will nest or hibernate in old burrows.
c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be
affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the
project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered
species.
During construction of the project there is potential to disturb or harm the rare features identified in
the NHIS database. The loggerhead shrike may be nesting on or near the site between April and July
and removal of trees or shrubs during this time has the potential to impact this species. Additionally,
use of plastic erosion control mesh has the potential to entangle and kill a variety of small animals
including the gopher snake.
d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish,
wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources.
The DNR identified measures to be taken in their correspondence dated March 27, 2017, included in
Appendix B. To minimize potential impacts to the gopher snake erosion control mesh, if used, will be
made of only wildlife friendly materials. To minimize potential impacts to the loggerhead shrike the
following mitigation measures will be implemented during construction:
Avoid or minimize tree and shrub removal within suitable habitat during loggerhead shrike
breeding season (April through July).
If any tree or shrub will be removed from suitable habitat suitable habitat during breeding
season, inspect the trees/shrubs for active nests prior to removal.
Report any loggerhead shrike sightings to the DNR.
Implementation of these measures will mitigate any potential impacts to rare features located on or near
the project site.
The SHPO was contacted regarding the potential for historic, cultural, or architectural resources on
and near the site. SHPOs records, included in Appendix B, indicates there are numerous resources in
the project vicinity, but not on the project site. Offsite resources are not anticipated to be impacted by
the development of the project. Although no resources have been identified onsite, in the event that a
possible resource is encountered during project construction, all activities will cease and proper
authorities will be contacted.
15. Visual:
Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual
effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the
project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects.
page 15
Page 21 of 161
Development of the site will change the visual landscape from vacant vegetated land to an urban
landscape with buildings and streets. This will result in a change to the views on or near the site.
However, these views are consistent with surrounding land uses and anticipated land use for the site
16. Air:
a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any
emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air
pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including
any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of
any methods used assess the projects effect on air quality and the results of that assessment.
Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or
mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions.
b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the projects traffic generation on air emissions.
Discuss the projects vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic
operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or
mitigate vehicle-related emissions.
Motor vehicle emissions will be associated with vehicles traveling to and from the development site
and from construction equipment necessary for the proposed construction activities. The most critical
pollutant associated with vehicular traffic in Minnesota is carbon monoxide (CO). Carbon monoxide
(CO) is one of five vehicle emission pollutants for which the US Environmental Protection Agency
has standards. CO is a colorless, odorless and tasteless toxic gas produced by the incomplete burning
of carbon in fuel.
Concentrations of carbon monoxide are typically greatest at intersections with poor levels of service
because of excessive idling or acceleration of vehicles. The existing concentration of carbon
monoxide at the project location is considered to be low because no part of Scott County has been
identified as a Carbon Monoxide Level Non-Attainment Location. The Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency has a nearby ambient air quality monitoring station in Shakopee (MPC Station SPPRC 505)
to track carbon monoxide levels.
c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and
odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under
item 16a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby
sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate
the effects of dust and odors.
Odors generated during construction will be mitigated by maintenance of the construction equipment
to the manufacturers specifications and by using appropriate fuel additives when necessary. Grading
and construction will temporarily generate dust. BMPs and other standard construction methods will
be used to reduce construction impacts such as intermittent applications of water to exposed soils as
needed to reduce dust during dry weather. Construction dust control is required to be in conformance
with City of Shakopees ordinances and the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit. Following
page 16
Page 22 of 161
construction, no dust is anticipated generated. The operation of the project is not anticipated to
involve processes that would generate odors.
17. Noise
Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project
construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1)
existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise
standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the
effects of noise.
The site is located in an urban/suburban area and is surrounded by residential areas, entertainment and
commercial land uses. Existing noise sources are those typical of residential areas and consist mainly
of traffic on the area roadways. Additionally, noise from the existing Canterbury Park may include
concert noise and noise associated with racing or special event activities. The nearest sensitive
receptors are the residential uses to the west and south. Following completion of the first project
phase, sensitive receptors will be located in the apartments constructed. During construction of future
phases these receptors would be subject to construction noise.
Grading and construction will temporarily generate noise. BMPs and other standard construction
methods will be used to reduce construction impacts such as limiting hours of operation to comply
with the noise regulations in City ordinance. Construction noise will be limited to daytime hours
consistent with the City of Shakopees construction and noise ordinances (7 am to 10 pm on
weekdays, 9 am to 9 pm on weekends and holidays). Construction equipment is expected to be
dispersed on the site rather than concentrated in one limited area for extended periods of time to limit
potential impacts.
18. Transportation
a. Describe traffic-related aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and
proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3)
estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip
generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative
transportation modes.
Based on the conceptual site plan, there will be a total of 2,290 parking spaces provided for the entire
mixed-use development. Following provides a breakdown of where the spaces will be allocated:
North Townhomes 135 parking spaces (2.25 spaces per unit)
Multi-Family Apartments 1,050 parking spaces (1.5 spaces per unit proposed based upon
developers experience with similar apartment projects of similar scale and unit mix.)
South Townhomes 216 parking spaces (2.25 spaces per unit)
West Commercial 150 parking spaces
East Commercial 700 parking spaces
An estimated parking needs assessment based upon the requirements of City Code is provided below.
All uses can comply with or exceed the City Code requirements, but it is anticipated the developer
will seek a reduction in the amount of required parking associated with the apartments through a PUD
application. Parking usage studies from similar developments elsewhere in the Metro can be
provided to document the real-world parking need for the proposed style and mix of units to be
proposed on this site.
page 17
Page 23 of 161
# of Total Parking
Land Use Number
Units Spaces
Residential 2.25 per unit 856 1,926
Hotels/Motels 1 per room 120 120
Hotels/Motels 1 per 2 employees 40 20
General
Commercial/
Retail 1 per 200 square feet 93,000 465
Total 2,531
While there are currently no transit options in the site vicinity, the project proposer is coordinating
with MetroTransit to provide a Bus Rapid Transit stop along the Shenandoah Drive extension.
b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements
necessary. The analysis must discuss the projects impact on the regional transportation system.
If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a
traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures
described in the Minnesota Department of Transportations Access Management Manual, Chapter
5 (available at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local
guidance,
c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects.
A comprehensive Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was conducted for the project in order to determine
the projects impact on the surrounding transportation system. The TIA is included Appendix E. The
analysis considered Existing conditions, Phase 1 (2020) conditions (Background and Total) and Full-
Build (2025) conditions (Background and Total). Background growth volumes were generated for the
Phase 1 (2020) and Full-Build (2025) conditions using a two percent annual growth rate. The
following provides a general summary of forecasted trips and measures necessary to mitigate
anticipated impacts of the development on the surrounding transportation system.
Trip generation estimates for the proposed project were based on information provided in ITEs Trip
Generation 9th Edition. Reductions in the overall trip generation forecast were considered to account
for internal capture and pass-by. The following provides an explanation of these trip reductions:
Internal Capture Represents traffic that is generated by the proposed development that will
make a stop at another land use with the development, therefore never entering the external
roadway network. These trips are reduced from the base trip generation potential to determine
the total number of driveway trips the proposed development will generate. In this case,
internal capture trips will travel along Shenandoah Drive, but are still considered to be
internal for the purposes of this traffic analysis.
Pass-By Reflects the travel patterns of motorists who are already traveling on the adjacent
study roadways (Eagle Creek Boulevard) and stop at the site in route to another primary
destination. Based on ITEs Trip Generation Handbook, pass-by reduction can be applied to
General Commercial (0% during the AM peak and 34% during the PM peak) and Restaurants
(0% during the AM peak and 43% during the PM peak).
page 18
Page 24 of 161
The table below provides trip generation estimates for daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour, and
accounts for trip reductions due to internal capture and pass-by. Based on the calculation, the overall
development is anticipated to generate 13,136 net new daily trips, 771 net new AM peak hour trips,
and 632 net new PM peak hour trips. At the completion of Phase 1 (350 apartment units), the
development is anticipated to generate 2,328 net new daily trips, 179 net new AM peak hour trips,
and 217 net new PM peak hour trips. More detail information on the trip generation calculation is
provided Appendix C of the traffic study.
Based on the analysis, the following measures are necessary to minimize project related
transportation effects on the surrounding transportation system. More detailed information regarding
these measures is provided in Appendix C of the traffic study.
County Highway 83 & US 169 (Eastbound) Extend the inside northbound right-turn lane to
Eagle Creek Boulevard to provide a full-length lane between the two intersections.
County Highway 83 & Eagle Creek Boulevard Convert the existing northbound right-turn
lane to a shared through-right lane and construct a new dedicated northbound right-turn lane.
County Highway 83 & 12th Avenue E Construct an additional westbound left-turn lane. This
improvement was identified in the County Highway 83 Corridor Readiness Study (Bolton &
page 19
Page 25 of 161
Menk, 2016). This improvement was included in the analysis but should be considered a
background improvement and not responsibility of the proposed mixed-use development.
County Highway 83 & Eagle Creek Boulevard Extend the eastbound right-turn and left-turn
lanes to provide a total of 350 feet of storage.
County Highway 83 Corridor Evaluate and Optimize traffic signal timings from 12th
Avenue E to Eagle Creek Boulevard.
19. Cumulative potential effects: (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are
addressed under the applicable EAW Items)
a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that
could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects.
Phase I of the project is proposed to be completed by 2020 and Phase II is anticipated to be completed by
2025. Any impacts to the environment (e.g., wetland, stormwater) will be required to meet Federal, State,
and Local regulation and will be mitigated as required; therefore, it is not anticipated that these impacts
will combine to create a cumulative potential effect.
b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been
laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic
scales and timeframes identified above.
No known development in the immediate project vicinity is proposed. Should projects be proposed in the
vicinity of the project in the future, the impacts associated with those projects will be assessed and
mitigated as needed. It is not anticipated that future projects will combine with the impacts caused by the
proposed projects in this EAW to cause significant cumulative potential effects.
c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available
information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental
effects due to these cumulative effects.
No known development is planned adjacent to the proposed project site at this time. Development of
the project is not anticipated to cause any future projects. Continued redevelopment of the Canterbury
Park site is always a possibility, but any such changes in land use on the adjacent site would be
reviewed as required by the City of Shakopee, and if necessary, a separate environmental review may
be necessary to be completed as a part of a future redevelopment project.
page 20
Page 26 of 161
20. Other potential environmental effects: If the project may cause any additional environmental
effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will
be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects.
RGU CERTIFICATION. (The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental
Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor.)
Title ________________________________
page 21
Page 27 of 161
4.B.1.
Resolution 7893
Certificate of Completion
Location Map-Plan Cover Sheet
Page 28 of 161
RESOLUTION NO. 7893
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Shakopee on August 6,
2014, JTS Construction Inc. has satisfactorily completed the 2014 Bituminous Trail Improvement
Projects in accordance with such contract.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby directed to
issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of $32,262.76, taking the
contractors receipt in full.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this
th
6 day of June, 2017.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ENGR/2014PROJECTS/2014BituminousTrailImprovements/WORD/RES7893-ACCEPT-WORK
Page 29 of 161
Page 30 of 161
Page 31 of 161
4.B.2.
Attached is Resolution 7894, which restricts parking and approves construction plans for
CSAH 83 (SAP 070-683-013). Currently, there is no parking of vehicles on this roadway.
Staff has reviewed and commented on the construction plans for the improvements to
CSAH 83. This resolution is required by Mn/DOT for State-Aid funding for Scott County.
Scott County has provided an exhibit showing staging and traffic control during the
improvement project and a few sample sheets from the construction plans showing the
proposed layout of CSAH 83. These documents are also attached to the memo. The project
is proposing to install concrete pavement on CSAH 83 and thus the longer time frame needed
for traffic control and phasing.
Page 32 of 161
Budget Impact:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution 7894
CSAH 83 Staging & Traffic Control Plan
CSAH 83 Construction Plans (sample)
Page 33 of 161
RESOLUTION 7894
A Resolution
Approving Plans for County State Aid
Highway 83 (SAP 070-683-013)
And
Restricting Parking on County State Aid
Highway 83 (SAP 070-683-013)
WHEREAS, Scott County has planned the improvement of County State Aid Highway 83
from County State Aid Highway 101 to Valley Industrial Boulevard South in the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, plans for Project No. S.A.P. 070-683-013 showing proposed alignment,
profile grades and cross-sections for the reconstruction and improvement of County State Aid
Highway 83 within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project have been prepared and presented to
the City; and
WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides
of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a County State Aid Street project must
therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions.
1. Such plans, a copy of which is on file and of record in the Office of the Scott County
Engineer, are hereby approved.
2. The City of Shakopee shall prohibit the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of
County State Aid Highway 83 at all times.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
__________________________________________
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk
ENGR/2017-PROJECT/COUNTY-PROJECTS/ /RES7894-CSAH83-NOPARK-APPROVE-PLANS
Page 34 of 161
F:\P\8322\09_CAD\8322_STAGING.dwg (5/26/2017 2:47 PM ) Page 35 of 161
F:\P\8322\09_CAD\8322_STAGING.dwg (5/26/2017 2:56 PM ) Page 36 of 161
F:\P\8322\09_CAD\8322_STAGING.dwg (5/26/2017 3:04 PM ) Page 37 of 161
GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS
PLAN SYMBOLS
STATE LINE
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT THE 2016 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN.
COUNTY LINE
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
TOWNSHIP OR RANGE LINE
ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE
SECTION LINE
QUARTER LINE
SIXTEENTH LINE
C.S.A.H. 83 AND 4TH AVE INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION TO THE "MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" (MN MUTCD)
AND PART VI, "FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS".
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
VACATED PLATTED PROPERTY LOCATED ON C.S.A.H. 83 FROM C.S.A.H. 101 TO 60' NORTH OF VALLEY INDUSTRIAL BLVD S INDEX
CORPORATE OR CITY LIMITS
P.I.
.
.
P .T
P .C
P.I.
TRUNK HIGHWAY CENTER LINE
RIVER OR CREEK
NAME
BRIDGES-LENGTH FEET MILES 6 STANDARD PLATES & INDEX OF TABULATIONS
7 EARTHWORK TABULATIONS
DRY RUN EXCEPTIONS-LENGTH 143.67 FEET 0.03 MILES
8 CONSTRUCTION AND SOILS NOTES
SIZE
DRAINAGE DITCH
NET LENGTH 1866.29 FEET 0.353 MILES 9 TABULATIONS
DRAIN TILE
LENGTH AND DESCRIPTION BASED UPON <NB83> 10 - 17 EXISTING UTILITY TABULATIONS
CULVERT
18 - 20 WATERMAIN PLANS
DROP INLET
GUARD RAIL
DESIGN SPEED NOT ACHIEVED AT: END (C.S.A.H. 83) 21 - 25 TYPICAL SECTIONS
P P
STA. 818+25.00 TO STA. 819+80.00 26 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS DETAIL
BARBED WIRE FENCE S.A.P. 070-683-013
27 - 30 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
WOVEN WIRE FENCE W W
STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE NOT MET FOR VERTICAL CURVE
BEGIN (C.S.A.H. 83) COUNTY PROJ. NO. CP83-22 31 - 51 STANDARD PLAN SHEETS
CHAIN LINK FENCE XC XC
HEDGE
COUNTY PROJ. NO. CP83-22 35 70 - 72 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY & UTILITY PLANS
RAILROAD CROSSING SIGN
73 - 75 REMOVAL PLANS
STA. 801+16.94 76 - 78
RAILROAD CROSSING BELL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
ELECTRIC WARNING SIGN 79 - 83 INTERSECTION AND ADA RAMP DETAILS
CROSSING GATE
END (C.S.A.H. 83) 84 - 88 PROFILES
MEANDER CORNER DESIGN EXCEPTION 89 - 90 CONCRETE PAVEMENT PLANS AND DETAILS
MAIL BOX MB
91 - 92 RETAINING WALL PLANS
STA. 819+80.00
SPRINGS
ACF
IIC 3
93 -104 DRAINAGE PLANS, PROFILES, TABULATIONS AND DETAILS
UNO
IN P 105-107 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)
MARSH 108- 113 EROSION CONTROL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
5 C.
S.A. 101 114- 125 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS
TIMBER H.
101
ORCHARD
126- 135 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLANS
(TIMBER)
BRUSH
136 CONTOUR PLANS
NURSERY 83 Rai
lr
137 CROSS SECTION LAYOUT PLANS
FIRE HYDRANT
RO AD
CATTLE GUARD
163 SHEETS
THIS PLAN CONTAINS
RD.
OVERPASS (Highway Over)
EA 169
GL
E 9
UNDERPASS (Highway Under)
BRIDGE
11 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
35'
B-BRICK ST-STUCCO CR
17TH SIGNATURE
IRON PIPE OR ROD
EE
K 21 BEGIN (C.S.A.H. 83)
53246 PRINT NAME KEVIN LARUE
CANTERBURY
MONUMENT (STONE, CONCRETE, OR METAL) DATE LIC. NO.
WOODEN HUB
GRAVEL PIT G
SHAKOPEE 16
DESIGN EXCEPTION
STA. 818+25.00
SAND PIT S
POP. 20,568
BORROW PIT B 15 BLV
D.
ROCK QUARRY Q 17
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL 20
CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF SHAKOPEE
UTILITY SYMBOLS
POWER POLE LINE
TELEPHONE OR TELEGRAPH
POLE LINE
T
HCADT (Future Year) 2037 8.6%
TELEPHONE CABLE IN CONDUIT
P
PAVEMENT DESIGN 10 TON
ELECTRIC CABLE IN CONDUIT
AERIAL TELEPHONE CABLE ESALS (20) 2,456,000 (20 YRS.) DISTRICT : METRO
V
SEWER, (SANITARY)
Design Speed 50 MPH
V
V
V
SEWER, (STORM)
SEWER MANHOLE
TITLE SHEET 1
5/5/2017
THIS PLAN AND/OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS PROJECT, AND ANY RE-USE OF DETAILS THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D.
OR SPECIFICATIONS ON OTHER PROJECTS IS NOT INTENDED OR AUTHORIZED BY THE DESIGNER. LIABILITY FOR THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02. C.P. # C.S.A.H. 83 AND 4TH AVE OF
ANY RE-USE ON OTHER PROJECTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERSON, AGENCY, OR CORPORATION USING ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING 83-22 INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION 163
PLAN OR SPECIFICATION DATA FROM THIS PROJECT. SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA".
Page 38 of 161
GENERAL NOTES: NOTES:
LEGEND
THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHOWN IN THIS PLAN GIVES CONSTRUCT APPROACH NOSE
A
A GRAPHICAL LOCATION WITH RESPECT TO THE (MNDOT STD PLATE 7113) 7" BITUMINOUS PAVING
GEOMETRIC DESIGN AND MAP DATA. THE EXACT
RIGHT-OF-WAY AND BOUNDARY CORNERS ARE C 10' CURB TRANSITION 0 50 100
4" BITUMINOUS PAVING
LOCATED BY REFERENCE TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
PLATS AND ARE IDENTIFIED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY scale in feet
MAP.
4" BITUMINOUS TRAIL
ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE B424 UNLESS NOTED 6" CONCRETE WALK (ADA RAMPS)
OTHERWISE.
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
COORDINATE PLACEMENT OF 6" PVC SIGN COLLARS IN
MEDIANS WITH THE ENGINEER. ALL WORK AND COSTS
ASSOCIATED FOR THE SIGN POST OPENINGS IS
INCIDENTAL.
BEGIN
217,500
ALL STATION/OFFSETS ARE SHOWN WITH RESPECT TO
S.A.P. 070-683-013
N.B. CSAH 83 ALIGNMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
COUNTY PROJ. NO. CP83-22
{ N.B. C.S.A.H. 83 <NB83> SEE CONCRETE PAVEMENT PLANS & DETAILS FOR
STA. 801+16.94 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
EX. R/W
{ S.B. C.S.A.H. 83 +98.2 PROP. R/W +87.2
TEMP. ESMT.
20.00' LT 66.61' LT
77
38.61' LT
S
100'R 36'
VD
108'R
8' BIT. TRAIL
8' SHLD
BL 8' BIT. TRAIL
TEMP. ESMT.
EX. R/W 8' BLVD (BOC)
+03.0
L
+15.3
+89.5 40.61'RT
TEMP. ESMT.
TR
{ N.B. C.S.A.H. 83
(AHTR_DRIVEWAY)
14.61' RT
(AHTR_DRIVEWAY)
S524 CURB
S
DU
18.60' LT
IN
18.60' RT
MODULAR BLOCK WALL
PROP. R/W
+38.7
+38.7
Y
LE
L
VA
460,500
460,500
460,500
217,500
218,000
218,500
H:\Projects\09000\9026\CAD_BIM\Plan\9026_cp01.dgn
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report S.A.P. 070-683-013 DRAWN BY
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and COUNTY PROJECT NO. H. FURAN
SCOTT COUNTY SHEET
that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
83-22
the laws of the State of Minnesota. DESIGNED BY
10:48:07 AM
D B424 C&G (MOD) GUTTER OUT ROADWAY WIDTH DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB
7
4" CONCRETE WALK UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. STATION/OFFSET AND
E B624 C&G (MOD) GUTTER OUT RADIUS DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB.
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 6" CONCRETE WALK (ADA RAMPS) F B418 C&G (MOD) GUTTER OUT ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE B424 UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE.
1
DETAIL SHEETS.
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
+32.82 (IP2) COORDINATE PLACEMENT OF 6" PVC SIGN COLLARS IN
15.00' LT EX. R/W MEDIANS WITH THE ENGINEER. ALL WORK AND COSTS
ASSOCIATED FOR THE SIGN POST OPENINGS IS
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS INCIDENTAL.
{ IP DRIVEWAY 3
PROP. R/W
1 SEE DRAINAGE PLANS FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
9 TEMP. ESMT. AND PROPOSED STORM SEWER
+74.2
38.00' LT
(4TH_AVE)
460,000
2
INFILTRATION POND 460,000 ALL STATION/OFFSETS ARE SHOWN WITH RESPECT TO
N.B. CSAH 83 ALIGNMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 460,000
+19.2 (IP3)
219,000
219,500
0.00' RT
220,000
+15.3 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SEE CONCRETE PAVEMENT PLANS & DETAILS FOR
+15.3
25.61' LT
25.61' RT
(4TH_AVE)
(4TH_AVE)
8.0
' B
LVD
(BO CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
8' C)
B BIT
76
. T
1:10 RAI
B L
+69 +72
51. .3 .
14' 51. 0
SEE SHEET NO.
+60.9 72'
810 815 LT 84'
+65.5 12' 72.61' LT LT
3
31.39' LT 12' B
+77.1 12' +60.9 8'
1:10 +40
.00 1:
SHL
19.39' LT 6' 14' B D
A 14' 19.39' LT 5
17.0' +88
A .50
810 14'
815 14'
C 1:5
C
29.4'R 12' +47.1 12'
2
+67.1 C
20.61' RT 1:20 29.4'R E 49.4'R
26.61' RT 14' C B
B D A 12'
B A 3.2 820
B 14' '
B E 14'
3 B624 CURB
19.10' RT
(4TH_AVE)
14'
18.80' LT
(4TH_AVE)
B
4
A
B 820
18.61' RT
(4TH_AVE)
+82.8
18.61' LT
F
+82.5
LT
+07.0
3
TEMP. ESMT. 'BL B B
8' VD(
+20.0 BIT BOC
. T ) F
25'
RAI
4
40.61' RT L
PROP. D&U ESMT.
29.4'R
5
219,000
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
220,000
'
.1
32
EX. R/W
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report S.A.P. 070-683-013 DRAWN BY
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and COUNTY PROJECT NO. H. FURAN
SCOTT COUNTY SHEET
that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
83-22
the laws of the State of Minnesota. DESIGNED BY
10:48:11 AM
SPU Memo
Page 41 of 161
Page 42 of 161
Page 43 of 161
Page 44 of 161
Page 45 of 161
Page 46 of 161
4.C.1.
Upon closer review of the scope of services submitted, staff was able to eliminate the lowest
submittal for lack of understanding of the services required. The number two and three
submittals were a difference of $5,200 per year. Multi-Services, Inc., the city's current
custodial company for the city's recreation facilities, submitted the third lowest bid.
Staff checked references on the remaining two lowest submittals and feels that Multi-
Services, Inc. has done a very good job providing the needed services for the city for the
past seven years, they know staff's expectations, no additional training is required and they
are aware of the current facilities.
Budget Impact:
Page 47 of 161
The 2017 budget includes $90,700 for cleaning services; $55,000 for the Community Center,
$28,000 for the Ice Arena and $7,700 for the Youth Building. The proposal by Multi-
Services, Inc. would be an increase in the 2018 budget by $8,516. The proposal includes
$59,256 for the Community Center, $32,340 for the Ice Arena and $7,620 for the Youth
Building totaling $99,216/year.
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 48 of 161
Page 49 of 161
Page 50 of 161
Page 51 of 161
Page 52 of 161
Page 53 of 161
Page 54 of 161
Page 55 of 161
Page 56 of 161
Page 57 of 161
Page 58 of 161
Page 59 of 161
Page 60 of 161
Page 61 of 161
Page 62 of 161
Page 63 of 161
Page 64 of 161
Page 65 of 161
Page 66 of 161
4.C.2.
The City Council has denied previous requests for similar fee waivers for non-profit
organizations.
All other aspects of the event fall within the established city ordinances and facility use
guidelines. The SDA will not be selling alcohol and is not requesting the extension of park
hours or additional police presence.
Budget Impact:
The SDA will pay the required park rental and special permit fees totaling $650 plus a $100
returnable deposit fee if their request is denied.
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 67 of 161
SDA Request Letter
Page 68 of 161
The Shakopee Diversity Alliance (SDA) is excited to present the Fifth Annual International
Festival, Friday, June 23rd, 2017 at Huber Park from 4 PM 9 PM.
The SDA is a 501c3 organization consisting of volunteers from our community dedicated to
celebrating the ethnic diversity of our City. The volunteer sub-committee of SDA that is running
the festival has been hard at work finalizing details for this years events. The committee is
asking the City of Shakopee for assistance with this event and is asking for the following:
Access:
The City will grant the committee full access to the park.
Police:
Shakopee PD will provide the regular patrol, (extra patrols are thought to be
unnecessary)
No alcohol will be sold at this event.
No pedestrian or traffic control is anticipated.
Parking:
Parking behind the buildings North of First Ave/101 and West of Fillmore St. will
be regulated during the festival. Event staff parking only, along with a loading
zone will be allowed on the North side of the parking lot (signs, cones will be
posted). Residents/business parking will be allowed on the South side of the
parking lot. The committee will manage signs and notices.
Bluff Ave between Main St. and the emergency gate, will be used for over-flow
parking. The City will open the emergency gate by 1 PM June 23rd, and close and
lock it again any time after 11 PM June 23rd.
We are asking that the City mark the area between Filmore and Main St.s with
parking slots, as they have in the past, with chalk or paint.
Public Works:
20 extra garbage bins will be placed by the support building by 10 AM June 23rd.
8 extra picnic tables will be placed in the park between the stage and support
building, by 10 AM June 23th.
Garbage containers will be placed in one area of the parking lot, by committee
volunteers, following the event for pick-up by city.
20 orange pylons (cones) will be placed by the support building by 10 AM June
23rd
Permits and fees:
The City will waive any City licensing fees for food vendors and peddlers
associated with this event, including display/sales vendors.
Page 69 of 161
The City grants the committee the right to charge for spaces within the park.
All insurance waivers will be provided to the city by the committee as needed.
Park:
Page 70 of 161
4.D.1.
Page 71 of 161
Shakopee City Council Minutes
May 16, 2017
7:00 PM
City Hall 129 Holmes St.
Staff Present: Administrator Bill Reynolds, Assistant Administrator Nate Burkett, City
Attorney Jim Thomson, Public Works Director Bruce Loney, Finance Director Darin
Nelson Planning and Development Director Michael Kerski, Park and Recreation Jamie
Polley, Senior Planner Mark Noble, Senior Planner Eric Weiss City Clerk Lori Hensen
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approval of Agenda
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to approve the agenda as presented, seconded
by Councilmember Kathi Mocol and the motion Passed.
5-0
4. Consent Business - (All items listed in this section are anticipated to be routine. After
a discussion by the Mayor there will be an opportunity for members of the Council to
remove any items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items
removed will be considered following the Public hearing portion of the agenda. Items
remaining on the Consent Agenda will not be discussed and will be approved in one
motion.)
Councilmember Mike Luce removed items 4.D.2. and 4.D.3. for further discussion
Councilmember Matt Lehman made a motion to approve the amended agenda, seconded
by Councilmember Kathi Mocol and the motion Passed.
5-0
A. Planning and Development
4. A.1. *Set Public Hearing for Vacation of Public Drainage & Utility Easement -
Riverview Estates 2nd Addition
Approve Resolution No. 7882, a resolution setting the public hearing date to consider
Page 72
1 ofof6161
the vacation of public drainage & utility easements for property located north of
CSAH 16, west of Kelly Circle, and east of CSAH 18. (Motion was carried under
consent agenda.)
4. A.2. *Letter of Support to MHFA for Village Apartments to preserve and
rehabilitate 62 units of Senior Housing
Adopt Resolution 7890 authorizing submission of a letter of support for assistance
from the Minnesota Housing and Finance Agency. (Motion was carried under consent
agenda.)
B. Police and Fire
4. B.1. *Declaration of Surplus Property
Motion to declare the listed property as surplus and authorize its disposal. (Motion
was carried under consent agenda.)
C. Public Works and Engineering
4. C.1. *Approve 2016 Street Lighting Quotes, Project 2016-5
Approve a motion approving quotes for the installation of lights on the 2016 Street
Lighting Project No. 2016-5. (Motion was carried under consent agenda.)
4. C.2. *Wetland Replacement Plan for Ridge Creek
Approve Resolution 7887, a Resolution approving a Wetland Replacement Plan for
the Ridge Creek project. (Motion was carried under consent agenda.)
4. C.3. *Approve a CenterPoint Energy Community Partnership Grant Application
Approve Resolution 7885 which is an application to CenterPoint Energy's 2017
Community Partnership Grant. The City of Shakopee is requesting $2,500.00, the
maximum grant funding amount allowed, to purchase two
TrafficLogix SafePace 100 Compact Speed signs. (Motion was carried under
consent agenda.)
4. C.4. *Award a contract for the Whispering Oaks Sanitary Sewer Extension
Project 2017-3
Approve Resolution 7878 which accepts the bids and awards a contract for Project
2017-3 to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. and approve a 5% contingency amount on the
project for use by the City Engineer in authorizing change orders or quantity
adjustments. Also, to authorize the appropriate city officials to execute an extension
agreement with Bolton & Menk, Inc. for construction engineering services. (Motion
was carried under consent agenda.)
4. C.5. *(SPUC) Shakopee Avenue Electric Undergrounding Project 2017-9
Page 73
2 ofof6161
Adopt Resolution 7888, a resolution receiving a Preliminary Engineering report and
calling for a public hearing on the (SPUC) Shakopee Avenue Electric Undergrounding
Project 2017-9. (Motion was carried under consent agenda.)
D. Parks and Recreation
4. D.1. *Tahpah Park West Extended Work Hours Request
Approve Saturday work hours for the Tahpah Park West project to begin at 7:00 am
through July, 2017. (Motion was carried under consent agenda.)
4. D.2. *Donation from the Shakopee Lions Club to the Lions Park Fund
Page 74
3 ofof6161
fundraiser. (Motion was carried under consent agenda.)
4. E.4. *Temporary Beer Licenses for the Shakopee Lions Club
Approve the applications and grant temporary on-sale 3.2 percent malt liquor licenses
to the Shakopee Lions Club for their softball tournament held at Tahpah Park on June
2 through June 4, 2017. (Motion was carried under consent agenda)
5. RECOGNITION OF INVOLVED CITIZENS BY CITY COUNCIL - Provides an
opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda.
Comments should not be more than five minutes in length. The Mayor may adjust that
time limit based upon the number of persons seeking to comment. This comment
period may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to
make political endorsements or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will
not enter into a dialogue with citizens, and questions from Council will be for
clarification only. This period will not be used to problem solve issues or to react to
the comments made, but rather for informational purposes only.
6. Business removed from consent will be discussed at this time
7. Public Hearings
7.A. Vacation of Portion of Drainage and Utility Easement In Ridge Creek
Subdivision
Councilmember Matt Lehman made a motion to open the public hearing, seconded by
Councilmember Kathi Mocol and the motion Passed.
5-0
Councilmember Kathi Mocol made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by
Councilmember Matt Lehman and the motion Passed.
5-0
Councilmember Matt Lehman made a motion to open the public hearing, seconded by
Councilmember Kathi Mocol and the motion Passed.
5-0
Page 75
4 ofof6161
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by
Councilmember Kathi Mocol and the motion Passed.
5-0
Councilmember Kathi Mocol made a motion to open the public hearing, seconded by
Councilmember Jay Whiting and the motion Passed.
5-0
Councilmember Kathi Mocol made a motion to close the pubic hearing, seconded by
Councilmember Matt Lehman and the motion Passed.
5-0
Page 76
5 ofof6161
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to approve Resolution 7889, which
awards a contract to MKSK for planning services related to the 2040 comprehensive
plan., seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol and the motion Passed.
5-0
11. Reports
11.A.Liaison and Administration
12. Other Business
13. Closed Session to discuss the Sale of City-owned properties located at 339 1 Ave W, 321
1 Ave W and 129 Holmes St S
No action was taken
14. Adjournment to June 6, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.
Councilmember Kathi Mocol made a motion to adjourn to June 6, 2017 at 7:00 pm,
seconded by Councilmember Matt Lehman and the motion Passed.
5-0
Page 77
6 ofof6161
4.D.2.
The applications and evidence of insurance are in order. The Police Department has
conducted the background investigations. The investigation has produced nothing that would
prohibit the issuance of the licenses.
Inspections by the Building Department and Fire Department are still needed and will be
completed before final issuance of the licenses.
Budget Impact:
None
Page 78 of 161
4.D.3.
The Police Department has conducted the customary background investigation and has
advised that it identified nothing that would prohibit the issuance of the licenses.
Inspections by the Building Department and Fire Department are still needed and will be
completed before final issuance of the licenses.
Budget Impact:
None
Page 79 of 161
4.D.4.
According to section 114.02 (I) of the city code, no on-sale license shall be granted for
operation on any premises which does not have city water. The council may waive this
requirement for any business having obtained an on-sale license prior to July , 1997,
1
and operating at premises where potable water is supplied from a well, i water
f quality
from the well is tested and approved by the Minnesota Department of Health in
accordance with their standards.
Staff has been in contact with the Minnesota Department of Health, Environmental Health
Services. They have advised that the wells at Dangerfield's Restaurant, Stonebrooke Golf
Club and at the Knights Event Center have been tested and meet water quality requirements.
Page 80 of 161
Budget Impact:
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 81 of 161
Page 82 of 161
Page 83 of 161
4.D.5.
This resolution, having been passed by many other cities throughout the State of Minnesota
does not take a specific position for or against any specific legislation. The intent of this
resolution is to show support for cities throughout the state, including Shakopee, to make
local decisions that impact a local constituency without undue interference from the State.
Budget Impact:
No budget impact.
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 84 of 161
RESOLUTION NO. 7895
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING LOCAL DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, local elected decision-makers are in the best position to determine what health,
safety and welfare regulations best serve their constituents; and
WHEREAS, just like state legislative leaders, local elected officials are held accountable through
Minnesotas robust elections process; and
WHEREAS, ordinances at the local level are enacted only after a comprehensive, legal and open
process; and
WHEREAS, local units of government are required to publish notices about meetings where
policies will be discussed and decisions will be made; and
WHEREAS, under the states Open Meeting Law, public policy discussions and decisions must
occur in meetings that are accessible to members of the public; and
WHEREAS, cities are often laboratories for determining public policy approaches to the
challenges that face residents and businesses; and
WHEREAS, preservation of local control in Minnesota has yielded statewide benefits such as the
2007 Freedom to Breathe Act, an amendment to the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act; and
WHEREAS, more than two dozen bills that restrict local decision-making have been introduced in
2017 to date.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 6th day of
June, 2017.
______________________________
William Mars
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
______________________________
City Clerk
Page 85 of 161
4.D.6.
The Shakopee Chamber has submitted the attached letter with requests for road closure,
picnic tables and barricades. The Chamber will be handling their own garbage pick up. The
Chamber is not requesting any fee waivers.
The applications for the event and liquor licenses are in order. They are requesting that the
council suspend city code 114.11 (A) Consumption and possession on public streets, property
and the like to allow patrons to drink on Lewis Street. They will be putting wrist bands on
persons purchasing liquor at the event.
Budget Impact:
Staff time will be needed to drop off and pick up the picnic tables, barricades and clear the
streets for the event. Most of this can be accomplished through normal working hours.
ATTACHMENTS:
Letter of Request
Page 86 of 161
Page 87 of 161
Page 88 of 161
7.A.1.
Council will be requested to approve the final award of bids at a future meeting after bids
have been reviewed and approved by RJM and WSB.
Budget Impact:
Project is budgeted in the CIP under Downtown Improvements, Lewis Street Alley and
Lewis Street Parking Lot with funding from the General Fund, Special Assessments,
Stormwater and the Tree Fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 89 of 161
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
Project:
City of Shakopee Downtown Improvements
Downtwon Shakopee
Shakopee, MN 55379
City Project No. 2193. For Downtown Project
6842. For Lewis Street Alley
6844. For Lewis Street Parking Lot
Owner:
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes St. S
Shakopee, MN 55379
Architect:
WSB & Associates
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Construction Manager:
RJM Construction
701 Washington Avenue North, Suite 600
Minneapolis, MN 55401
NOTICE TO QUALIFIED CONTRACTORS Notice is hereby given that the City of Shakopee will
receive sealed bids from qualified bidders until 2:00 p.m., Thursday, June 29th at Shakopee City Hall,
129 Holmes St. S, Shakopee, MN 55379.
The project work scope consists of the reconstruction of a new surface parking area at Lewis Street,
new plaza area at River City Plaza, and new plaza area at Gateway Plaza.
A bid security in the amount of 5% of the base bid will be required to accompany bids. Bids received
after that time will not be accepted and will be returned unopened.
Sealed bids will be received at the Shakopee City Hall, 129 Holmes St. S, Shakopee, MN 55379 until
2:00 p.m., Thursday, June 29, 2017 at which time bids will be publically opened, reviewed, and read
aloud. Envelopes containing bids must be sealed, marked City of Shakopee Downtown
Improvements and the Bid Category No. being bid. The name and address of the Bidder must be
shown on the outside of the envelope. The date and time of the bid is to be noted on the label. Bids
received after this time will not be accepted and will be returned unopened.
Bidding documents including the Proposal Form, Drawings and Specifications will be on file at the
office of the Construction Manager:
RJM Construction
701 Washington Avenue North, Suite 600
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Phone: (952) 837-8600
A pre-bid meeting and walk thru will be conducted at the Shakopee City Hall, 129 Holmes St. S.,
Shakopee, MN 55379 Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 1:00 p.m.
Page 90 of 161
HOW TO GET PLANS:
Complete set(s) of hard copy Bidding Documents can be obtained through National Reprographics as
noted in AIA Document A701, Article 1 for a check deposit made payable to RJM Construction of
$125.00 per set. A CD of the documents will be available for purchase in the amount of $20.00 per CD
plus shipping with check made payable to National Reprographics. National Reprographics can be
contacted at (651)779-8000, 11343 39th Street North, Suite B, Lake Elmo, MN 55042. The documents
will be available on or about June 7, 2017. National Reprographics will refund the cost of only one set
to those bidders who submit a bona fide bid and return the bid documents to National Reprographics
within 30 days of the bid date, subject to the conditions of AIA Document A701. If more than one
hardcopy set is required additional sets may be purchased at $200.00 each.
Plans will also be available for review only at the following locations (hard copy or electronic documents
are available only at National Reprographics):
RJM Construction
701 Washington Avenue North, Suite 600
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Make Bids in duplicate in exact accordance with the proposal form in the Project Manual, and sign in
long-hand. No oral, telegraphic or fax bids will be accepted or considered.
Submit with each bid a certified check or acceptable bidders bond payable to the City of Shakopee in
the amount equal to five percent (5%) of the total bid.
All bids will be evaluated by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager. The Owner
reserves the right to accept any bid or reject any or all bids, or parts of such bids and waive
informalities or irregularities in bidding. Successful bidders will be required to furnish satisfactory Labor
and Material Payment Bond, Performance Bond, and Certificates of Insurance and a signed contract
within 10 days of award of contract. No bidder may withdraw his/her bid for at least 60 days after the
scheduled bid opening.
The schedule for the project is to commence work on August 2017. Work will be completed according
to the preliminary project construction schedule issued in the Bid Documents.
END OF ADVERTISEMENT
Page 91 of 161
7.A.2.
On March 21, the City Council approved the preliminary plat and PUD of Ridge Creek,
which included 104 single-family lots. Lennar is currently grading the site and plans to begin
construction of the first phase of houses in the development after the grading and
infrastructure installation is complete.
Ridge Creek First Addition is a proposed plat of 44 single-family residential lots on the south
side of the Ridge Creek Planned Unit Development (PUD), adjacent to Eagle Creek Blvd.
The property is zoned R1B, Urban Residential and guided for single-family residential
development.
The first addition also includes the right-of-way for the extension of Crossings Blvd from
Riverside Bluffs to Pike Lake Road and three outlots. Outlot C is intended for future
development, Outlots A and B are open space, totaling approximately 38.6 acres.
The first addition will complete the extension of Oak Ridge Trail between Riverside Bluffs
and Ridgeview Estates. The applicant will also complete the trail along Eagle Creek Blvd
Page 92 of 161
and the connection to the trail from Red Oak Path. The proposed final plat is consistent with
the approved preliminary plat of Ridge Creek.
The applicant and staff have discussed landscaping within this development at length. The
applicant has removed 10 additional trees for a haul road and additional trees in the county
road 21 right-of-way during site grading. Planning staff and Natural Resources staff are
recommending that the applicant replace the additional trees at rate approved by City Code
and trees removed in the county highway right-of-way be replaced at a 1:1 ratio, since the
trees were not on the applicant's property.
As approved by the City Council in the preliminary plat, the park dedication fees collected
for this development will be committed to development of the open space within this
development, with any remaining park dedication funds committed to the park reserve fund.
The Public Works Director intends to contribute stormwater funds to the development of the
open space around the Prior Lake - Spring Lake Outlet Channel. The watershed district may
also contribute funds.
Budget Impact:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Location Map
Aerial Photo
Proposed Final Plat
Landscape Plan
Watershed District Comments
Engineering / Natural Resources Comments
Parks and Recreation Comments
Resolution No. 7897
Legal Description for Resolution
Page 93 of 161
Page 94 of 161
Title
March 3, 2017
Page 95 of 161
Map Powered by DataLink
from WSB & Associates
Page 96 of 161
Page 97 of 161
Page 98 of 161
Page 99 of 161
Page 100 of 161
Page 101 of 161
Page 102 of 161
Page 103 of 161
Page 104 of 161
Page 105 of 161
Page 106 of 161
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
INTRODUCTION
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Parks and Recreation Department staff
has reviewed the final plat proposal application for the Ridge Creek development. The
applicant is proposing to dedicate 38 acres of wetland as park dedication. Per the
approved preliminary plat the applicant is required to provide cash in lieu of land for park
dedication.
The following conditions are recommended by the PRAB and Parks and Recreation
Staff;
1. Park dedication fees in the amount required by the City Code and adopted City fee
schedule shall be paid at the time of recording of the final plat.
Preliminary park dedication calculations (to be confirmed at time of final plat) are as
follows:
2. The applicant to provide a trail connection along County Road 16 to tie into the trail
to the east and west.
3. The applicant is required to install sidewalk on one side of all residential streets.
4. The applicant is required to construct maintenance trails along the ponds or drainage
ditch at the time the wetlands are restored or the drainage ditch is improved or
moved (if part of the development project).
6. Wetland, ponding areas, drainageways, and utility easements accepted by the city
shall not be considered in the park land and/or cash contribution to the city.
7. The applicant shall provide and install open space, and trail boundary signage as
determined to be needed by the city. The city shall provide the signage for open
space and trail boundary, and the applicant provide the posts and installation of the
signage.
WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described
as:
See Attached Exhibit; and
WHEREAS, public notice was provided and the Planning Commission of the City of
Shakopee held a public hearing on March 9, 2017, at which the Planning Commission heard from
City Planning staff and invited members of the public to comment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee approved the Preliminary Plat
and PUD of Ridge Creek on March 21, 2017, and
WHEREAS, the City Council heard from staff and the Applicant regarding the final plat
of Ridge Creek First Addition at their meeting on June 6, 2017; and
II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall
apply:
1. The applicant must comply with all the conditions of Resolution No. 7851, the
resolution approving the Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development.
2. Outlots A and B must be deeded to the City of Shakopee.
3. The applicant will provide adequate wetland buffers and associated easements/outlots
as set forth in Section 54.32 of our Code of Ordinances.
4. The applicant shall provide and install open space, and trail boundary signage as
determined to be needed by the city. The city shall provide the signage for open space
and trail boundary, and the applicant provide the posts and installation of the signage.
5. A utility coordination plan is required and must receive approval from the City of
Shakopee. Right-of-way permits will not be granted without an approved coordination
plan.
6. Locations of trees planted by the applicant must be marked by the applicant and
approved by the city prior to planting.
____________________________
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
______________________________
Lori Hensen, City Clerk
PREPARED BY:
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379
While hiring for the position, staff analyzed data from our comparable cities based on a City
Engineer/Public Works Director salary range. Out of our ten comparable cities, only two
cities had a similar dual role of a City Engineer/Public Works Director, Coon Rapids and St.
Louis Park. The rest of our eight comparable cities have separated the role and have both a
City Engineer and a Public Works Director.
Coon Rapids and St. Louis Park have their salary ranges for the City Engineer/Public Works
Director annually from approximately $120,000 to $150,000. The eight cities that have the
roles separated are paying between $203,000 and $270,000 annually for both positions. More
and more cities are converting to having both a Public Works Director and a City Engineer
due to their difficulties in hiring a dual position.
Based on staying competitive within the market, and the need to fill the City Engineer/Public
Works Director, staff is requesting that the position of City Engineer/Public Works Director
be reclassified to a Grade 12.
Applications were solicited as part of an initial search, however after a review of resumes,
staff reopened the search due to the quality of candidates received. Subsequently, first
and second round interviews were conducted involving a variety of city staff and officials
including employees of the Engineering and Public Works divisions. A thorough background
check has been conducted for the final candidate.
Based upon this process, staff recommends that the City Council authorize the hiring of
Steve Lillehaug as the city's next City Engineer and Director of Public Works, subject to the
completion of a pre-employment physical and drug test.
Mr. Lillehaug has over 13 years experience working for municipalities including the cities of
Edina and Minnetonka where he served as their Assistant City Engineer, and in Brooklyn
Center as the City Engineer and Director of Public Works. He holds a Bachelor of Science
The proposed compensation and benefits for Mr. Lillehaug are as follows:
1. Starting salary of Step A, Grade 12 of the City's 2017 Non-Union Pay Plan ($134,644 per
year).
2. Vacation of 160 hours annually.
3. Sick Leave at the standard accumulation rate and cap as designated in the Personnel
Handbook.
Mr. Lillehaug will need to complete the required pre-employment physical and drug test and
provide notice to his current employer. His anticipated start date is July 12, 2017.
Budget Impact:
Position is currently allocated in the budget. Although this position hire is at the top of the
city pay scale, recent hires in the department have saved over $39,000 per year. In addition,
when looking at personnel costs as a whole, the city will not be looking to fill the position of
Economic Development Coordinator.
ATTACHMENTS:
RJM Construction LLC has requested payment 16 for construction services on the
community center renovation project. $768,580.95
Soft Play LLC 2nd installment for indoor playground equipment was made in the
amount of $41,349.25.
Included in the check list are various refunds, returns, and pass through.
Budget Impact:
Operating and capital expenditures within the 2017 budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
Key
Varies more than 10% than budget positively
Varies more than 10% than budget negatively
Within 10% of budget
&RPSDQ\ $PRXQW
*(1(5$/)81'
)25)(,785(
(&2120,&'(9(/230(17$87+25,7<
$*2,03%21'6
3$5.5(6(59(
&$3,7$/,03529(0(17)81'
&20081,7<&(17(5 ,&($5(1$
&,7<+$//
75((5(3/$&(0(17
6(:(5)81'
685)$&(:$7(5)81'
3$5.$66(7,6)81'
,1)27(&+,6)81'
%8,/',1*,6)81'
6:0(752'58*7$6.)25&(
(6&52:)81'
,19(670(1775867)81'
5HSRUW7RWDOV
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
$&7,21)/((7,1&
(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ),5(
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
&20&$67 &RQWLQXHG
(48,30(175(17 32/,&(
0$<
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
*$5</),6&+/(5 $662&,$7(63$ &RQWLQXHG
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 ),5(
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 ),5(
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
+25,=21&200(5&,$/322/6833/< &RQWLQXHG
-' 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 322/
1'3<07
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
.1(&+7
61856(5,(6 /$1'6&$3,1* &RQWLQXHG
0$7(5,$/6 75((5(3/$&(0(17
0$7(5,$/6 75((5(3/$&(0(17
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
/2*,6 &RQWLQXHG
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,163(&7,21
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ),1$1&(
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
&20387(56(59,&(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
3527(&+'(6,*1 &RQWLQXHG
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 &20081,7<&(17(5 ,&($5(1$
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
6+$.23((3(77<&$6+&,7<2) &RQWLQXHG
322/ 3(77<&$6+&+$1*()81' 322/
67$5783
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
6287+:(671(:63$3(5,1& &RQWLQXHG
$35,/ 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3/$11,1*
$35,/ 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* &/(5.
$35,/ 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* &/(5.
$35,/ 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* &/(5.
$35,/ 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* &/(5.
$35,/ 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* &/(5.
$35,/ 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3/$11,1*
$35,/ 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3/$11,1*
$35,/ 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3/$11,1*
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
675(,&+(5
6 &RQWLQXHG
, 81,)2506&/27+,1* ),5(
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
:+((/(5+$5':$5(&2 &RQWLQXHG
63 %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
$0(5,&$1*/$66 0,5525,1& &RQWLQXHG
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
)$67(1$/ &RQWLQXHG
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
0,11($32/,6),1$1&('(37 &RQWLQXHG
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
5 563(&,$/7,(62):,6&216,1,1& &RQWLQXHG
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
6.</,1(%8,/',1*(19(/23(&2168/7$176 &RQWLQXHG
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
9(5,=21:,5(/(66 &RQWLQXHG
7(/(3+21( ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
7(/(3+21( ),5(
7(/(3+21( ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
7(/(3+21( ),5(
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
9(5,=21:,5(/(66 &RQWLQXHG
7(/(3+21( &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
7(/(3+21( ,&($5(1$
7(/(3+21( ,&($5(1$
7(/(3+21( 3/$11,1*
7(/(3+21( ,19(67,*$7,21
7(/(3+21( 3$752/
7(/(3+21( 3$752/
7(/(3+21( 3$752/
&20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
&20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
&20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
9(5,=21:,5(/(66 &RQWLQXHG
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
&20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
&20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
&20387(5$&&(66 75,%$/6(59,&(6
7(/(3+21( 3$5.
7(/(3+21( )/((7
7(/(3+21( 52:0*7
7(/(3+21( 3$5.
7(/(3+21( 675((7
7(/(3+21( 675((7
7(/(3+21( 675((7
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
9(5,=21:,5(/(66 &RQWLQXHG
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
7(/(3+21( ('$0$1$*(0(17
&20387(5$&&(66 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
7(/(3+21( 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
7(/(3+21( 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
7(/(3+21( 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
&20387(5$&&(66 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
&20387(5$&&(66 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
%5<$152&.352'8&76 &RQWLQXHG
0$7(5,$/6 $//(<0$,17
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
'5,9(5$1'9(+,&/(6(59,&(6 &RQWLQXHG
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
,17/,167,78(72)081,&,$/&/(5.6 &RQWLQXHG
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
/,1.&$%,1(76 &RQWLQXHG
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
0$5&2 &RQWLQXHG
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
08/7,6(59,&(6,1& &RQWLQXHG
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
52%(57%+,//&2 &RQWLQXHG
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
6+5('5,*+7$52+1,1'8675,(6&2 &RQWLQXHG
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06 &RQWLQXHG
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 $35 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 $35 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 $35 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
3$1(5$%5($' $35 )22' ,19(67,*$7,21
*5$1'9,(:/2'*($1'7(11, $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,19(67,*$7,21
*5$1'9,(:/2'*($1'7(11, $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,19(67,*$7,21
*5$1'9,(:/2'*($1'7(11, $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,19(67,*$7,21
*5$1'9,(:/2'*($1'7(11, $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,19(67,*$7,21
*5$1'9,(:/2'*($1'7(11, $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,19(67,*$7,21
*5$1'9,(:/2'*($1'7(11, $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,19(67,*$7,21
*5,==/<6*5,//$1'6$/221 $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,19(67,*$7,21
.5<7(5,21,1& $35 &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* $'0,1,675$7,21
)$67(1$/&203$1< $35 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 1$785$/5(6285&(6
%8,/'$6,*1&20 $35 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 1$785$/5(6285&(6
/2:(6
$35 0$7(5,$/6 75((5(3/$&(0(17
7+(+20('(327 $35 %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
(0(5*(1&<0(',&$/352'8& $35 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06 &RQWLQXHG
7$5*(7 $35 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 322/
3$<3$/
':5:163<5 $35 81,)2506&/27+,1* ),5(
$0$=21&20$0=1&20%,// $35 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 $35 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
836
0-02 $35 3267$*( ),5(
836
=-%7 $35 3267$*( ),5(
67($.16+$.(4 $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
8%(586$35)<=5 $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
7,/7('.,/738%$1'($7(5 $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
0,11($32/,6$,53257 $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
'(/7$$,5%$**$*()(( $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
'(/7$$,5%$**$*()(( $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
'(/7$$,5%$**$*()(( $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
'(/7$$,5%$**$*()(( $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
'(/7$$,5%$**$*()(( $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
2)),&(0$;2)),&('(327 $35 2)),&(6833/,(6 &2'((1)25&(0(17
6+$.23((&+$0%(52)&200( $35 &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* &/(5.
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06 &RQWLQXHG
:0683(5&(17(5 $35 2)),&(6833/,(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6
2)),&(0$;2)),&('(327 $35 2)),&(6833/,(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6
0,11(627$67$7(&2//(*(6 $35 &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* (1*,1((5,1*
3,==$13$67$ $35 )22' (1*,1((5,1*
0,11(627$67$7(&2//(*(6 $35 &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* (1*,1((5,1*
:0683(5&(17(5 $35 2)),&(6833/,(6 (1*,1((5,1*
*2(6/,7+2*5$3+,1*&203$1 $35 2)),&(6833/,(6 0$<25 &281&,/
0$''(16*8///$.( $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( $'0,1,675$7,21
0$''(16*8///$.( $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( $'0,1,675$7,21
$91*$7(
029$9,&20 $35 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 7(/(&20081&$7,21
<($5/,&20 $35 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3(56211(/3$<52//
3$<3$/
6287+0(7523 $35 &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 32/,&(
%&$75$,1,1*('8&$7,21 $35 &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 32/,&(
0,11(627$6+(5,))6$661 $35 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,19(67,*$7,21
3$<3$/
*2*,,,1& $35 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 32/,&(
,1
0,11(627$&,72)),&(5 $35 &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 3$752/
0,11(627$&+,()62)32/,& $35 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 5(&25'6
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06 &RQWLQXHG
706(48,3&20 $35 %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
6833/<+286(&20 $35 %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
6833/<+286(&20 $35 %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
6833/<+286(&20 $35 %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
&8%)22'6 $35 )22' ),5(
'2187&211(&7,212)6+ $35 )22' ),5(
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
01'(372)/$%25 ,1'8675< &RQWLQXHG
%/'*,163685&+*307 $35,/ %/'*3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+*307 $35,/ 3/80%,1*3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+*307 $35,/ (/(&75,&3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+*307 $35,/ +($7,1*3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+*307 $35,/ : 63(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+*307 $35,/ ),5(3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+*307 $35,/ $'0,1,675$7,9(&+$5*(6 ,163(&7,21
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\
&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
/<1&+&$3,7$/&253 &RQWLQXHG
23(5$7,1*/($6( 2/ (48,30(175(17 &20081,7<&(17(5
&KHFNV
()73D\PHQWV
7RWDO3D\PHQWV
Funds transferred electronically May 17, 2017 to June 6, 2017
PAYROLL $ 564,679.93
FIT/FICA $ 182,308.76
STATE INCOME TAX $ 37,155.74
PERA $ 172,190.77
HEALTH CARE SAVINGS $ 21,924.61
HEALTH SAVINGS ACCT $ 14,200.74
NATIONWIDE DEF COMP $ 22,580.20
ICMA DEFERRED COMP $ 1,964.28
MSRS $ 7,632.10
FSA $ 4,604.45
MN WAGE LEVY $ -
Total $ 1,029,241.58