Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
J. Murray
Aerospace Engineering Student, Lab Section 1007, Tempe, AZ, 85287
The experiment was preformed to examine what effect a change in the Reynolds number
would have on the lift and drag characteristics of the NACA 0012 wing section. The wing
profile is common and well studied. It has well documented properties that provide precise
data to compare with the experimental data. The results of this lab showed the lift and drag
characteristics of the wing section. These results were a maximum coefficient of lift was
about .8, and happened at 9 to 10 degrees. The drag and lift increase together until around
10 degrees where lift no longer increases but drag does. The lift and angle of attack are
linearly related up to point of stall. The results also show that the drag on the wing section
increases as the angle of attack increased. The wing section was tested at three data points.
These were Reynolds numbers of 50000, 100000, and 150000. The Reynolds numbers were
set by the velocity and air density inside the wind tunnel. The data produced a very small
error for the results. Because of historical data it was known before the experiment that low
Reynolds numbers produce erroneous data. This is caused by premature stall of the wing
section. This result was present in our data, even with these results the experiment provided
data that is accurate and expected.
Nomenclature
A = area of the wing section
AOA = angle of attack
Cd = coefficient of drag
Cl = coefficient of life
Cy = force coefficient in the y direction
c = chord
D = Drag
L = Lift
l = chord length
q = dynamic pressure
Re = Reynolds number
UCd = uncertainty of the coefficient of drag
Ud = uncertainty of drag
Uq = uncertainty of total pressure
URe = uncertainty of Reynolds number
v = velocity
= atmospheric density
= viscous forces
I. Introduction
The laboratory procedure was an exploration of the aerodynamic lift and drag forces experienced by a NACA
0012 wing section at low Reynolds numbers. The model experienced a low speed uniform free stream velocity. This
velocity was set by using specific Reynolds numbers. When low Reynolds numbers are used, the data for the
velocities will show the characteristics of the laminar-separation bubble on the top surface of the wing section. This
laminar-separation is caused by low velocities and is not representative of actual results found at Reynolds numbers
The coefficients of lift and drag that are calculated show the increase in these values in response to the increase
in AOA, and also the point at which the laminar-separation occurs. Laminar separation can also be referred to as
wing stall. The equations to calculate these forces are the Coefficient of Lift (1), and the Coefficient of Drag (2).
L
Cl (1)
qA
D
Cd (2)
qA
The coefficient for lift shows the point of separation where the lift curve levels off or falls when it is plotted against
the AOA. The separation point is the maximum value of the plot line. The separation occurred when the lift falls
The polar plot is a plot of Cd versus Cl that shows the best climb or sink rate that the wing section has at the
specific Reynolds number. To find the best climb rate of the wing section in this experiment a tangential line is
drawn from the origin of the plot to the plot line. This point is the best climb rate the wing section has for the
Although we know the Reynolds number that we are testing at, the true number needs to be found for the sake of
vl
Re (3)
3
2
T
air 1.458 10 6 (4)
T 110.4
This allowed the calculation of the Reynolds number for each data set.
Once all of these values have been found it is important to know what the uncertainty of each one is. To do this,
2
U DU a DU q
2 2
U Cd d 2 (5)
qA qA q A
2
To find the uncertainty of the coefficient of lift the equation used is (6)
U LU a LU q
2 2 2
U Cl l 2
2
(6)
qA qA q A
Then the uncertainty of the Reynolds number was found using the equation (7)
Re vl
(7)
2
These numbers make it possible to evaluate the lift and drag at the different Reynolds numbers and to see how they
II. Procedure
Barometer
Thermometer
Pressure transducer
Load Cell
The experiment was conducted by first recording the ambient temperature and pressure. This was done using a
barometer and thermometer. These values were then entered into the computer which was running the program
LABView, with the experiment already programmed into it. The chord length and the span width of the wing
section were also recorded and entered into the program. The type of wing section at this time was also noted as
The wing section was then placed into the wind tunnel test section. The wing section was fastened onto a pylon
that had a cross section that was a NACA 0012. This pylon was attached to a pressure gauge that would measure the
force of lift created by the wing section. The pitch of the wing section was then adjusted so that the AOA was zero
degrees. The pitch angle was adjusted by a knob that was located underneath the pylon and outside of the wind
tunnel.
The next step was to calculate the ambient temperature and viscosity. To calculate this Bernoulli’s equation was
used for the pressures, and Sutherland’s equation was used to find the viscousity. The data was acquired with a pitot
tube in the test section and a thermometer. This data was used to determine the dynamic pressure in the wind tunnel
at each Reynolds number. The data was entered into LABView for automatic calculation of the required values.
These calculations used the equations (1), (2), (3), and (4).
The wind tunnel was then turned on and adjusted until LABView had a Reynolds number reading of 50000.
Once this value was reached and the value that the pressure gauge was recording settled the measurement was
written into LABView. This procedure was done for all angles from negative 10 to positive 15 with each step being
one degree. The data acquisition was carried out the same way for each Reynolds number that was evaluated. These
Reynolds numbers were 50000, 100000, and 150000. All the steps were repeated until the complete data sets were
acquired.
III. Results
The results of this experiment were very precise and matched what was expected very closely. The Reynolds
numbers were found using equation (3). The true value for each measurement was used to create an average value
for the setting. The calculated average value for 50000 was 50356 +/-690. For the setting of 100000 the calculated
average value was 100300 +/- 1374. And for the setting of 150000 the calculated average value was 149710 +/-
2050.5. These values are shown in table (10) in the appendix. The error for these values is close to one percent. This
is not a very significant error at the low Reynolds numbers but can become significant if the numbers get close to the
The lift was plotted against the AOA for each Reynolds number. This provided a plot that shows what the lift on
the wing is at each AOA for the specific Reynolds number. This is shown in figure (1).
Coefficient of Lift versus Angle of Attack
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Cl
0
The plot clearly shows that as the angle of attack increases so does the lift of the wing section. The plot also shows
the laminar-separation at an AOA of 9 and 10 degrees. The plot also shows that laminar-separation is smaller as the
Reynolds number increases. This is because as the Reynolds number increases, the air becomes more viscous. The
viscosity in turn keeps the boundary layer attached to the wing surface. With the laminar flow being smoother over
the wing surface the lift is greater as the Reynolds number increases. This separation can be seen in figure (3).
Figure 3: Laminar-separation
The coefficient of drag was plotted against the coefficient of lift for figure (2). This plot shows that as the lift
0.2
Cd
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Cl
Also in figure (2) the plot shows when laminar-separation occurs. This is between the coefficients of lift of .7 to .9.
At this value the NACA 0012 wing section no longer provides anymore lift but is creating a large amount of drag.
The plot shows that both drag and lift are related. The two coefficients are related by the equation (8).
C d C do KCl (8)
This equation describes that the drag coefficient increases as the parasite drag increases and the coefficient of lift is
IV. Conclusion
The experiment has shown that as the AOA increases so does lift until laminar-separation occurs. The
relation between lift and AOA is linear until laminar-separation starts to occur. The experiment data does not match
the data from the NACA 0012 data. This is because of the low Reynolds number. If the number was closer to normal
The lift and drag also increase together as the AOA of the wing section changes. This suddenly changes with
laminar-separation. At this point the wing section no longer produces more lift but it does increase the drag as more
The errors that happened in the experiment were very obvious in figure (2). The data point that causes a spike
does not belong in the set. It could possibly be from recording the data before the velocity stream settled or the
vibrations from the wing section settled. It is too far out to have been from a degree adjustment. Where the lift vs.
AOA plot has an increase in lift at -1 AOA could possibly be from a mistaken angle adjustment that was not
corrected, or it could have been from the adjustment knob not being used accurately. These errors did not prove to
References
Anderson, J.D. A History of Aerodynamics and Its Impact on Flying Machines,Chapter 7 pp. 308.
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/6/67/Flow_separation.jpg
&imgrefurl=http://www.answers.com/topic/flow-
separation&h=189&w=320&sz=12&hl=en&start=7&um=1&tbnid=doUK_kpUoFyVcM:&tbnh=70&tbnw=118&pr
ev=/images%3Fq%3Dlaminar%2Bflow%2Bseparation%2Bon%2Ba%2Bwing%2Bsurface%26svnum%3D10%26u
m%3D1%26hl%3Den
Appendix A
Ambient
Drag Temp DyPres Angle of
Lift (N) Pres Renumber
(N) (K) (Pa) attack
(Pa)
0.11 0.12 310.18 67.71 96500 0 50720.11
0.18 0.14 309.92 67.52 96500 1 50761.38
0.42 0.17 310.13 66.98 96500 2 50440.12
0.74 0.18 310.95 66.29 96500 3 50197.04
0.89 0.19 311.07 66.38 96500 4 50048.35
1 0.21 310.99 67.28 96500 5 50469.94
1.14 0.23 311.09 67.24 96500 6 50574.89
1.27 0.27 311.39 67.1 96500 7 50210.14
1.38 0.28 311.29 67.07 96500 8 50349.39
1.46 0.31 311.13 66.51 96500 9 50184.36
1.74 0.13 310.81 65.78 96500 10 49988.88
1.5 0.43 310.2 65.07 96500 11 49751.92
1.42 0.48 310.48 64.99 96500 12 49709.91
1.38 0.53 310.26 65.63 96500 13 49926.27
1.38 0.59 310.32 65.71 96500 14 50002.92
1.38 0.65 310.47 66.79 96500 15 50341.16
0.14 0.11 310.3 67.34 96500 -1 50657.43
0.04 0.1 310.39 67.61 96500 -2 50664.95
-0.22 0.09 310.92 67.58 96500 -3 50699.85
-0.47 0.08 310.55 67.49 96500 -4 50675.4
-0.68 0.08 311.03 67.06 96500 -5 50389.84
-0.78 0.07 310.93 66.4 96500 -6 50033.63
-0.89 0.07 311.13 66.95 96500 -7 50264.53
-1 0.07 310.8 67.16 96500 -8 50456.63
-1.13 0.07 311.06 67.26 96500 -9 50459.38
-1.21 0.07 311.11 67.63 96500 -10 50528.61
Appendix B
Equations used
L
Cl
qA
D
Cd
qA
vl
Re
3
2
T
air 1.458 10 6
T 110.4
2
U DU a DU q
2 2
U Cd d 2
qA qA q A
2
Re vl
2
Re vl
2
2 2
P
err U P U T
RT
Appendix C
function lab2=lift()
clc;
clear;
load lift1.txt;
load lift2.txt;
load lift3.txt;
Chord=.0794;%m
Ucord=.001;%m
Span=.4001;%m
Uspan=.001;%m
Ulift=.001;%N
Utemp=.1;%C
Upress=.01;%1 percent
A=Chord*Span;
% Calculate Re
Temp=lift1(:,3);
Temptwo=lift2(:,3);
Tempthree=lift3(:,3);
L=lift1(:,1);
z=length(L);
Ltwo=lift2(:,1);
Lthree=lift3(:,1);
D=lift1(:,2);
Dtwo=lift2(:,2);
Dthree=lift3(:,2);
R=287;
t=length(Temp);
P_atm=lift1(:,5);
P_atmtwo=lift2(:,5);
P_atmthree=lift3(:,5);
q=lift1(:,4);
qtwo=lift2(:,4);
qthree=lift3(:,4);
P=P_atm + q;
Ptwo=P_atmtwo + qtwo;
Pthree=P_atmthree + qthree;
rho=zeros(size(P));
l=Chord;
Vf=zeros(size(Temp));
mu=1.458e-6;
for i = 1:t
Vf(i)=(mu*(Temp(i)^1.5))/(Temp(i)+110.4);
Vftwo(i)=(mu*(Temptwo(i)^1.5))/(Temptwo(i)+110.4);
Vfthree(i)=(mu*(Tempthree(i)^1.5))/(Tempthree(i)+110.4);
rho(i)=P(i)/(R*Temp(i));
rhotwo(i)=Ptwo(i)/(R*Temptwo(i));
rhothree(i)=Pthree(i)/(R*Tempthree(i));
V(i)=sqrt((2*q(i))/rho(i));
Vtwo(i)=sqrt((2*qtwo(i))/rhotwo(i));
Vthree(i)=sqrt((2*qthree(i))/rhothree(i));
Re(i)=(rho(i)*V(i)*l)/Vf(i);
Retwo(i)=(rhotwo(i)*Vtwo(i)*l)/Vftwo(i);
Rethree(i)=(rhothree(i)*Vthree(i)*l)/Vfthree(i);
i=i+1;
end
Reynolds_Number =sum(Re)/z;
Reynolds_Number_two = sum(Retwo)/z;
Reynolds_Number_three = sum(Rethree)/z;
Temp=lift1(:,3);
Temptwo=lift2(:,3);
Tempthree=lift3(:,3);
R=287;
t=length(Temp);
t=length(Temptwo);
t=length(Tempthree);
P_atm=lift1(:,5);
P_atmtwo=lift2(:,5);
P_atmthree=lift3(:,5);
q=lift1(:,4);
qtwo=lift2(:,4);
qthree=lift3(:,4);
P=P_atm + q;
Ptwo=P_atmtwo + qtwo;
Pthree=P_atmthree + qthree;
rho=zeros(size(P));
rhotwo=zeros(size(Ptwo));
rhothree=zeros(size(Pthree));
l=Chord;
Vf=zeros(size(Temp));
Vftwo=zeros(size(Temptwo));
Vfthree=zeros(size(Tempthree));
mu=1.458e-6;
for i = 1:t
Ua=sqrt((.0794*.001)^2+(.4001*.001^2)^2);
Vf(i)=(mu*(Temp(i)^1.5))/(Temp(i)+110.4);
Vftwo(i)=(mu*(Temptwo(i)^1.5))/(Temptwo(i)+110.4);
Vfthree(i)=(mu*(Tempthree(i)^1.5))/(Tempthree(i)+110.4);
rho(i)=P(i)/(R*Temp(i));
rhotwo(i)=Ptwo(i)/(R*Temptwo(i));
rhothree(i)=Pthree(i)/(R*Tempthree(i));
V(i)=sqrt((2*q(i))/rho(i));
Vtwo(i)=sqrt((2*qtwo(i))/rhotwo(i));
Vthree(i)=sqrt((2*qthree(i))/rhothree(i));
Upatm(i)=P_atm(i)*.01+P_atm(i);
Upatmtwo(i)=P_atmtwo(i)*.01+P_atmtwo(i);
Upatmthree(i)=P_atmthree(i)*.01+P_atmthree(i);
Utemp(i)=Temp(i)+.1;
Utemptwo(i)=Temptwo(i)+.1;
Utempthree(i)=Tempthree(i)+.1;
Uchord=Chord*.001+Chord;
Uspan=Span*.001+Span;
Ulift=.005;
Udrag=.005;
Uq(i)=.001*.001*q(i);
Uqtwo(i)=.001*.001*qtwo(i);
Uqthree(i)=.001*.001*qthree(i);
Umu(i)=((.000002187*(Utemp(i))^.5)/(Utemp(i)+110.4)-(.000001458*Utemp(i)^1.5/(Utemp(i)+110.4)^2)*.1);
Umutwo(i)=((.000002187*(Utemptwo(i))^.5)/(Utemptwo(i)+110.4)-(.000001458*Utemptwo(i)^1.5/(Utemptwo(i)+110.4)^2)*.1);
Umuthree(i)=((.000002187*(Utempthree(i))^.5)/(Utempthree(i)+110.4)-
(.000001458*Utempthree(i)^1.5/(Utempthree(i)+110.4)^2)*.1);
Urho(i)=sqrt((-Upatm(i)/(R*(Temp(i))^2)*.1)^2+(1/(R*Utemp(i)))*1.1^2);
Urhotwo(i)=sqrt((-Upatmtwo(i)/(R*(Temptwo(i))^2)*.1)^2+(1/(R*Utemptwo(i)))*1.1^2);
Urhothree(i)=sqrt((-Upatmthree(i)/(R*(Tempthree(i))^2)*.1)^2+(1/(R*Utempthree(i)))*1.1^2);
Uv(i)=sqrt(.5*(sqrt(2)/(sqrt(q(i)/rho(i))*rho(i))*1.1)^2+(-.5*(sqrt(2)*q(i)/(sqrt(q(i)/rho(i)))*(rho(i))^2)*Urho(i))^2);
Uvtwo(i)=sqrt(.5*(sqrt(2)/(sqrt(qtwo(i)/rhotwo(i))*rhotwo(i))*1.1)^2+(-
.5*(sqrt(2)*qtwo(i)/(sqrt(qtwo(i)/rhotwo(i)))*(rhotwo(i))^2)*Urhotwo(i))^2);
Uvthree(i)=sqrt(.5*(sqrt(2)/(sqrt(qthree(i)/rhothree(i))*rhothree(i))*1.1)^2+(-
.5*(sqrt(2)*qthree(i)/(sqrt(qthree(i)/rhothree(i)))*(rhothree(i))^2)*Urhothree(i))^2);
UCl(i)=sqrt((Ulift/(q(i) * A))^2 + ((-L(i) * Ua)/(q(i) * A^2))^2 + ((-L(i) * Uq(i))/(A * q(i)^2))^2);
UCltwo(i)=sqrt((Ulift/(qtwo(i) * A))^2 + ((-Ltwo(i) * Ua)/(qtwo(i) * A^2))^2 + ((-Ltwo(i) * Uqtwo(i))/(A * qtwo(i)^2))^2);
UClthree(i)=sqrt((Ulift/(qthree(i) * A))^2 + ((-Lthree(i) * Ua)/(qthree(i) * A^2))^2 + ((-Lthree(i) * Uqthree(i))/(A * qthree(i)^2))^2);
UCd(i)=sqrt((Udrag/(q(i) * A))^2 + ((-D(i) * Ua)/(q(i) * A^2))^2 + ((-D(i) * Uq(i))/(A * q(i)^2))^2);
UCdtwo(i)=sqrt((Udrag/(qtwo(i) * A))^2 + ((-Dtwo(i) * Ua)/(qtwo(i) * A^2))^2 + ((-Dtwo(i) * Uqtwo(i))/(A * qtwo(i)^2))^2);
UCdthree(i)=sqrt((Udrag/(qthree(i) * A))^2 + ((-Dthree(i) * Ua)/(qthree(i) * A^2))^2 + ((-Dthree(i) * Uqthree(i))/(A * qthree(i)^2))^2);
Urerho(i)=(((V(i)*.0749)/Vf(i))*Urho(i))^2;
Urerhotwo(i)=(((Vtwo(i)*.0749)/Vftwo(i))*Urhotwo(i))^2;
Urerhothree(i)=(((Vthree(i)*.0749)/Vfthree(i))*Urhothree(i))^2;
UreV(i)=(((Urho(i)*.0749)/Vf(i))*Uv(i))^2;
UreVtwo(i)=(((Urhotwo(i)*.0749)/Vftwo(i))*Uvtwo(i))^2;
UreVthree(i)=(((Urhothree(i)*.0749)/Vfthree(i))*Uvthree(i))^2;
UreUl(i)=(((rho(i)*V(i))/Vf(i))*.001)^2;
UreUltwo(i)=(((rhotwo(i)*Vtwo(i))/Vftwo(i))*.001)^2;
UreUlthree(i)=(((rhothree(i)*Vthree(i))/Vfthree(i))*.001)^2;
UreUmu(i)=(((-rho(i)*V(i)*.0749)/(Vf(i)^2))*Umu(i))^2;
UreUmutwo(i)=(((-rhotwo(i)*Vtwo(i)*.0749)/(Vftwo(i)^2))*Umutwo(i))^2;
UreUmuthree(i)=(((-rhothree(i)*Vthree(i)*.0749)/(Vfthree(i)^2))*Umuthree(i))^2;
Ure(i)=sqrt(Urerho(i)+UreV(i)+UreUl(i)+UreUmu(i));
Uretwo(i)=sqrt(Urerhotwo(i)+UreVtwo(i)+UreUltwo(i)+UreUmutwo(i));
Urethree(i)=sqrt(Urerhothree(i)+UreVthree(i)+UreUlthree(i)+UreUmuthree(i));
i=i+1;
end
uncertainty_Reynolds_Number = sum(Ure)/z
uncertainty_Reynolds_Number_two = sum(Uretwo)/z
uncertainty_Reynolds_Number_three = sum(Urethree)/z
%Coefficient of lift
Clpositive=zeros(size(16));
for i = 1:16
Clpositive(i)=Lpositive(i)/(q(i)*A);
Clpositivetwo(i)=Lpositivetwo(i)/(qtwo(i)*A);
Clpositivethree(i)=Lpositivethree(i)/(qthree(i)*A);
i=1+i;
end
Clnegative=zeros(size(10));
for i = 1:10
Clnegative(i)=Lnegative(i)/(q(i+16)*A);
Clnegativetwo(i)=Lnegativetwo(i)/(qtwo(i+16)*A);
Clnegativethree(i)=Lnegativethree(i)/(qthree(i+16)*A);
i=i+1;
end
FCln=fliplr(Clnegative);
FClntwo=fliplr(Clnegativetwo);
FClnthree=fliplr(Clnegativethree);
FAOAn=fliplr(AOAnegative);
FAOAntwo=fliplr(AOAnegativetwo);
FAOAnthree=fliplr(AOAnegativethree);
Cltotal= [FCln Clpositive];
Cltotaltwo= [FClntwo Clpositivetwo];
Cltotalthree= [FClnthree Clpositivethree];
AOAtotal=[FAOAn AOApositive];
AOAtotaltwo=[FAOAntwo AOApositivetwo];
AOAtotalthree=[FAOAnthree AOApositivethree];
figure(1)
hold on
plot(AOAtotal,Cltotal,'r');
errorbar(AOAtotal,Cltotal,Ulift,'r');
plot(AOAtotaltwo,Cltotaltwo,'g');
errorbar(AOAtotaltwo,Cltotaltwo,Ulift,'g');
plot(AOAtotalthree,Cltotalthree);
errorbar(AOAtotalthree,Cltotalthree,Ulift);
Dpositive=zeros(size(16));
Dnegative=zeros(size(10));
for i = 1:16
Dpositive(i)=D(i);
Dpositivetwo(i)=Dtwo(i);
Dpositivethree(i)=Dthree(i);
i=1+i;
end
for i = 1:10
Dnegative(i)=D(i+16);
Dnegativetwo(i)=Dtwo(i+16);
Dnegativethree(i)=Dthree(i+16);
i=1+1;
end
%Coefficient of Drag
Cdpositive=zeros(size(16));
for i = 1:16
Cdpositive(i)=Dpositive(i)/(q(i)*A);
Cdpositivetwo(i)=Dpositivetwo(i)/(qtwo(i)*A);
Cdpositivethree(i)=Dpositivethree(i)/(qthree(i)*A);
i=1+i;
end
Cdnegative=zeros(size(10));
for i = 1:10
Cdnegative(i)=Dnegative(i)/(q(i+10)*A);
Cdnegativetwo(i)=Dnegativetwo(i)/(qtwo(i+10)*A);
Cdnegativethree(i)=Dnegativethree(i)/(qthree(i+10)*A);
i=i+1;
end
FCdn=fliplr(Cdnegative);
FCdntwo=fliplr(Cdnegativetwo);
FCdnthree=fliplr(Cdnegativethree);
Cdtotal= [FCdn Cdpositive];
Cdtotaltwo= [FCdntwo Cdpositivetwo];
Cdtotalthree= [FCdnthree Cdpositivethree];
figure(3)
Hold on
plot(Cltotal,Cdtotal,'r');
errorbar(Cltotal, Cdtotal, UCd,'r');
plot(Cltotaltwo,Cdtotaltwo,'g');
errorbar(Cltotaltwo, Cdtotaltwo, UCdtwo,'g');
plot(Cltotalthree,Cdtotalthree);
errorbar(Cltotalthree, Cdtotalthree, UCdthree);
end
Abstract
An abstract appears at the beginning of Full-Length Papers (Survey and Design Forum Papers, History of Key
Technologies Papers, invited lectures, and Technical/Engineering Notes do not include abstracts). The abstract is
one paragraph long (not an introduction) and complete in itself (no reference numbers). It should indicate subjects
dealt with in the paper and state the objectives of the investigation. Newly observed facts and conclusions of the
experiment or argument discussed in the paper must be stated in summary form; readers should not have to read the
paper to understand the abstract. Format the abstract bold, indented 3 picas (1/2”) on each side, and separated from