RUBRIC FOR INTERGRATED PROJECT (BKF2343 MATERIAL & ENERGY BALANCE)
Please assess each item using the given scales. Fractional marks will be given for each category.
Subject : BKF2343 MATERIAL & ENERGY BALANCE
Section :
Evaluator :
Evaluation Date :
Matric No.
Attributes
History & background
Application and use of
products
Market survey
Screening of synthesis route.
Include the economic potential
analysis, raw materials,
effectiveness/efficiency of
selected processes, preliminary
safety and environmental
issues
Process Flowchart
Complete numbering, labeling
and convincingly describe the
processes & equipment
involved with novelty &
creativity
Manual Material Balance
Detail calculation and
assumption involved in
calculation must be clearly
stated and mentioned.
Manual Energy Balance
Detail calculation and
assumption involved in
calculation must be clearly
stated and mentioned.
Excel/Spreadsheet Material
Balance
Excel/Spreadsheet Energy
Balance
Auxiliary Equipment
Propose suitable of auxiliary
equipment heat exchangers,
pump, compressor and
calculate the material & energy
requirement
References
Format/Layout/Arrangement
ID
Acceptable (1)
Weak explanation and
information is not adequate.
Weak explanation and
information is not adequate.
Weak explanation and
information is not adequate.
Only one synthesis route is
discussed.
Poor numbering and labeling
of flow chart.
Material balance calculation
was reported with some major
errors, involving the major
equipment and process units
in the plant.
Energy balance was reported
with some major errors,
involving the major equipment
and process units in the plant.
Excel calculations are not
complete.
Excel calculations are not
complete.
Auxiliary equipment proposed
not completed and no
calculation made related to
material and energy
requirement
Ununiformed referencing
system / not cited in the text
So many format errors as to
make report ineffective
Good (3)
Adequate information with fair
explanation but the points is
not properly written and
connected
Adequate information with fair
explanation but the points is
not properly written and
connected
Adequate information with fair
explanation but the points is
not properly written and
connected
At least two synthesis routes
are presented but not
discussed thoroughly and
interestingly.
Incomplete or fair numbering
and labeling of flow chart. The
composition of the stream is
summarized in one table
below the flow chart
Material balance calculation
was reported fully with no
serious mistake and was
made on the major equipment
and process units in the plant.
Energy balance was reported
fully with no serious mistake
and was made on the major
equipment and process units
in the plant.
Excel calculations are
compete yet not flexible.
Excel calculations are
compete yet not flexible.
Majority of auxiliary
equipment proposed but still
contain some error on
calculation made related to
material and energy
requirement
A few citation not listed in test
/ few citation available in text
but not listed in the list of
reference
A few format errors
Very Good (5) Score
Complete explanation and all
information available with
X1
good writing style.
Complete explanation and all
information available with
X1
good writing style.
Complete explanation and all
information available with
good writing style. The data X1
for market survey is latest and
reasonable.
More than two synthesis
routes are discussed and
explained thoroughly and
interestingly. X2
Complete numbering and
labeling of flow chart. The
composition of the stream is
X2
summarized in one table
below the flow chart
Material balance calculation
reported has considerably
correct rigorous calculations
with less than three small X3
mistakes.
Energy balance reported has
considerably correct rigorous
calculations with less than
three small mistakes. X3
All the data/calculation is
connect properly and can be
X1
easily change to the desire
basis of calculation.
All the data/calculation is
connect properly and can be
X1
easily change to the desire
basis of calculation.
X2
Auxiliary equipment was
completely proposed with
detail calculation of material
and energy balance
requirement related to the
equipment.
All citations in text are
available and references are
X1
systematic
Unique format aspects that
enhance report impact X2
TOTAL (FULL MARK 100)
Last updated: 17 May 2016@Dr SMS
 BKF2343 MATERIAL & ENERGY BALANCE INTERGRATED PROJECT PEER EVALUATION

Use the following criteria as the basis for evaluating yourself and your team members on a scale of 1 (low) to 4 (high) according to the rubrics in the table below.

CRITERIA RANK DESCRIPTION

4 Proactively act as a leader and influence others
Leadership 3 Actively participate and occasionally influence others
I
skill 2 Participate without any effort to be a leader
1 Showing a passive behavior and tend to follow others
4 Contributions were a major portion of the team discussions, and decisions; contribution was of good quality
Contribution
3 Made valuable contributions to team discussions, and decisions; contribution was of good quality
II and Quality of
2 Occasionally contribute to team discussions, and decisions; contribution was of poor quality
Work
1 Made little contribution to team discussions, and decisions; contribution was of poor quality
4 Exceptionally helpful, respectful, and considerate of other team members
3 Respected team members, considerate, cooperative
III Team Work
2 Contribute to team effort, but not committed to team building; sometimes impatient, disrespectful, or inconsiderate of team members
1 Lack of commitment to the team effort, or overbearing and inconsiderate of team members
4 Adequately independent
3 Able to work individually with minimum supervision
IV Dependability
2 Able to work individually with supervision
1 Too dependent and can not work without instructions
4 Student proactively contributes to class by offering knowledge and ideas
Knowledge 3 Student frequently contributes to class by offering knowledge and ideas
V and Idea
Sharing 2 Student rarely contributes to class by offering knowledge and ideas
1 Student never contributes to class by offering knowledge and ideas

RANK RATING (1, 2, 3, or 4)

CRITERIA S1 (your self) S2 S3 S4 S5 S6

Name

I Leadership skill
II Contribution and Quality of Work
III Team work
IV Dependability
V Knowledge Sharing
TOTAL

COMMENTS

Last updated: 17 May 2016@Dr SMS