Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
THE CRAFTSMAN
W . K i r k M a c N u l t y was born in California in 1932. He studied at
Stanford University and the University of Tennessee, and has followed mil-
itary and business careers. His involvement in freemasonry spans more
than 39 years.
W KIRK MACNULTY
THE WAY OF
THE CRAFTSMAN
LONDON
This Edition First Published in England 2002
Copyright 2002
1 Background
1 THE MYSTERIES 1
2 HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS 2
3 COSMOLOGY 12
4 PSYCHOLOGY 20
Freud 23
Jung 25
2 The Craft
1 PREREQUISITES AND MOTIVES 29
2 T H E L O D G E AS A M O D E L O F T H E P S Y C H E 33
Structure - The Temple 33
Consciousness - The Officers of the Lodge 36
Dynamics - The Basic Laws 46
5 King S o l o m o n ' s P o r c h
1 T H E C E R E M O N Y OF RAISING 127
2 THE TRADITIONAL HISTORY 131
3 DEATH 135
4 THE WORK OF A MASTER MASON 138
6 T h e W a y o f the C r a f t s m a n
1 T H E L O D G E AS A W O R K I N G G R O U P 143
2 INDIVIDUAL LABOUR 145
London,
Foreword
For thirty years I have been in the privileged position o f being able t o
make a real 'daily advancement in M a s o n i c k n o w l e d g e ' and t o
ponder the great questions relating t o Freemasonry. In m y time in the
G r a n d Lodge L i b r a r y and M u s e u m I w a s regularly asked if there w a s
a b o o k which gave the 'official' e x p l a n a t i o n o f w h a t either a
particular piece o r the ritual as a w h o l e m e a n t . I w a s delighted t o be
able t o say n o . It might seem totally at odds with m y profession -
Librarianship - t o delight in n o t being able t o produce a b o o k but on
those occasions I believe m y reaction was right. Surely the essence o f
any initiatory system - f o r that is w h a t F r e e m a s o n r y is - is the
individual's p e r s o n a l p r o g r e s s t h r o u g h s e l f - k n o w l e d g e and
understanding t o an individual perception o f the relevance o f
Freemasonry b o t h t o their o w n lives and t o the w o r l d at large.
In 1 8 1 6 G r a n d L o d g e established the basic ceremonies o f the C r a f t
and then, matters o f great principle apart, s t o o d b a c k . In particular
they did n o t explain the ritual and gave n o c o m m e n t o n any authors
w h o chose t o do s o . As a result English F r e e m a s o n r y has developed
since 1 8 1 6 w i t h o u t any f o r m o f d o g m a . T h a t , surely, is o n e o f its
strengths and one o f the ways it has maintained the b r o a d basis o f its
membership and brought together those ' w h o must otherwise have
remained at a perpetual distance' (Old C h a r g e s ) . B y having n o
dogma English F r e e m a s o n r y encompasses the full spectrum f r o m
those w h o see it in purely social terms t o those w h o , perhaps, read
t o o m u c h into o u r rituals, with all other shades o f opinion between
them. In fine, English F r e e m a s o n r y allows its m e m b e r s t o m a k e their
o w n j o u r n e y t h r o u g h the Craft and to make that journey
c o m f o r t a b l e t o the traveller's immediate circumstances.
T h a t being said, however, there is n o reason w h y the individual
should n o t f r o m time t o time share with others his perspectives and
insights on that journey - provided that the reader is a w a r e t h a t the
writer is simply relating his o w n experiences and insights a n d is n o t
propounding fundamental 'truths' on which all must agree. All t o o
often such authors are fundamentalist in style, believing that they
have f o u n d a universal truth which must be accepted and adopted by
all. W e describe o u r M a s o n r y as being speculative but t o o m a n y
forget the meaning o f that w o r d and in their d o g m a t i s m w o u l d
deprive others o f the privilege o f speculation.
W h e n , m o r e t h a n a decade a g o , K i r k M a c n u l t y asked m e t o read
the draft o f this b o o k I w a s impressed by the c a l m , simple and
u n d o g m a t i c w a y in which he retold the thoughts and experiences he
has so far h a d during his journey t o w a r d s understanding the
mysteries o f Freemasonry. I do n o t always agree with his conclusions
but his w o r d s stimulated m y thoughts and gave me a wider
perspective in m y o w n journey.
T o those within the C r a f t w h o are m a k i n g the same journey and t o
those outside seeking t o understand the p h e n o m e n o n o f F r e e m a s o n r y
I w o u l d r e c o m m e n d this b o o k as a thoughtful and stimulating guide.
J M Hamill
2001
INTRODUCTION
This b o o k has a very particular orientation t o w a r d Freemasonry. It
interprets the C r a f t as a " G o d - c e n t e r e d p s y c h o l o g y " . F o r s o m e , even
for some M a s o n s , t h a t m a y seem t o be a strange idiom w h i c h does
not appear to have m u c h t o do with F r e e m a s o n r y as it is generally
understood today. T h e idea is n o t as farfetched as it might at first
seem. T h e C r a f t as we k n o w it h a d its origin in the British Isles at the
end o f the R e n a i s s a n c e . If one considers the philosophical writings o f
that period, it b e c o m e s clear that the scholars o f the time gave a great
deal o f attention t o the subject o f psychology, as C. G . J u n g has
pointed out in Psychology and Alchemy.
T h e essential belief o f the R e n a i s s a n c e scholar, w h i c h distinguished
his ideas f r o m the conventional teachings o f the C h u r c h , w a s that the
individual h u m a n being could turn within himself, rise up through
the "celestial world o f the s o u l " (psyche) a n d the "super-celestial
world o f the S p i r i t " , and perceive the Presence o f G o d within himself.
T h e Renaissance scholar w h o practiced this idea encountered his
psyche as s o o n as he t u r n e d w i t h i n t o e x a m i n e his o w n
consciousness, as does the present day practitioner w h o seeks t o
understand human behaviour. T h e difference between the
Renaissance and c o n t e m p o r a r y views is that the goal o f psychology
today is t o enable everyone t o m a k e a satisfactory adjustment t o
c o n t e m p o r a r y society and life in the physical w o r l d , while the
Renaissance scholar considered the psyche t o be a bridge between the
physical world and the w o r l d o f the Spirit.
T h i s latter view e m b r a c e s a very exalted idea o f h u m a n potential.
It seems t o me t h a t a great deal has been lost, and a great deal o f
human suffering has been caused, by the a b a n d o n m e n t o f this
R e n a i s s a n c e view o f the h u m a n being. F r e e m a s o n r y , being a
codification o f the essential philosophy o f the R e n a i s s a n c e , e m b r a c e s
this exalted view o f h u m a n i t y ; and it describes, in the process o f its
T h r e e Degrees, the interior ascent t o w h i c h the scholars o f the
Renaissance aspired. It is m y hope that the interpretation o f the
C r a f t ' s s y m b o l i s m described in this b o o k will c o n t r i b u t e the
rediscovery o f that interior w a y o f ascent, the W a y o f the C r a f t s m a n .
Arlington, Virginia
Spring 2 0 0 1
CHAPTER 1
Background
1 THE MYSTERIES
2 HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS
O u r purpose in considering historical material is t o establish s o m e
link between the C r a f t as it exists today and the ancient disciplines
which we have called ' T h e M y s t e r i e s ' . Writers w h o try t o establish
that link usually ascribe s o m e historical authority t o the legends
which are t o be f o u n d within the Craft's ritual. T h e y use t h a t
'evidence' t o s h o w that the C r a f t itself originated in ancient times.
W h i l e valid in its o w n terms, such an a p p r o a c h does little t o convince
those w h o give serious t h o u g h t t o the subject. M o r e o v e r , claims o f
that sort c o n t r a d i c t the real evidence that is available w h i c h suggests
that the C r a f t is o f relatively recent origin - p r o b a b l y n o t older t h a n
four hundred years, at m o s t . O u r a p p r o a c h t o m a k i n g a c o n n e c t i o n
between the C r a f t and its ancient predecessors will be t o l o o k at the
history o f t h o u g h t . W e will n o t attempt a t h o r o u g h study o f the
subject (indeed, c o n t e m p o r a r y scholars do n o t yet have a complete
understanding o f the period which is o f interest t o us); we will try
only to describe the intellectual climate within which the Craft
evolved as a m e a n s o f determining the c o n t e x t within w h i c h to
interpret its symbolism.
Freemasonry itself c a m e into existence in its present general f o r m
in 1 7 1 7 w h e n four Lodges w h i c h h a d been meeting in L o n d o n 'since
lime i m m e m o r i a l ' joined t o f o r m the G r a n d L o d g e o f E n g l a n d , the
first such body t o exist anywhere in the w o r l d . T h e r e is very little
accurate i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t the C r a f t prior t o that time. W e k n o w of
a few isolated incidents - f o r e x a m p l e , that Elias A s h m o l e w a s made
a M a s o n in 1 6 4 6 and Sir R o b e r t M o r a y in 1 6 4 1 - but very few facts
are available; and in his recently published History of English
Vreemasonry J o h n H a m i l l lists only nineteen verifiable events prior to
the founding o f the G r a n d Lodge ( J o h n H a m i l l , The Craft, Crucible,
1 9 8 6 ) . After considering w h a t evidence is available, m o s t serious
historians ( M a s o n s and n o n - m a s o n s alike) w h o have e x a m i n e d the
subject consider that the O r d e r evolved in the late 1 5 0 0 s o r early
1600s that is, t o w a r d s the end o f the English R e n a i s s a n c e . It is to the
history o f the R e n a i s s a n c e and o f R e n a i s s a n c e thought that we will
give o u r attention.
T h e Renaissance is a difficult period t o study. If one stands well
hack and views it as a w h o l e (say f r o m the G r e a t Plague in 1 3 4 7 t o
the founding o f the R o y a l Society in 1 6 6 0 ) one c a n see it as a period
of the m o s t p r o f o u n d social c h a n g e . Western civilization entered the
Renaissance as an otherworldly society with a religious orientation
and emerged f r o m it as a pragmatic society with a materialistic
orientation. T h e m e c h a n i s m o f this p r o f o u n d change is still n o t
completely understood.
Until relatively recently historians have recognised t w o principal
s c h o o l s o f t h o u g h t as being c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f t h e p e r i o d :
Scholasticism, w h i c h w a s o f medieval origin and f o r m e d the basis o f
the rigorous views o f the C a t h o l i c C h u r c h ; and H u m a n i s m , which
was o f R e n a i s s a n c e origin and w a s substantially m o r e liberal in its
o u t l o o k . T h e i n t e r a c t i o n o f these t w o w a y s o f t h i n k i n g is
conventionally considered t o have been played out against the
background o f the contest for p o w e r between the P a p a c y (and the
Church in general) and the H o l y R o m a n E m p e r o r (and the secular
authorities in general). T h i s struggle had been the m a j o r social
ideological issue o f the M i d d l e Ages and was t o continue well into the
sixteenth century.
W e c a n say, s o m e w h a t arbitrarily, that H u m a n i s m started in the
middle o f the fourteenth century with a resurgence o f interest in the
study o f the Classical w o r l d . T h e H u m a n i s t s developed a perspective
o n the Classics w h i c h h a d n o t been possible within the strictly
defined limits o f Scholastic t h o u g h t . T h e H u m a n i s t view focused o n
m a n (who w a s considered t o be unique because o f his ability t o
l e a r n ) , on h u m a n values, and on h u m a n superiority over nature. In
particular the H u m a n i s t s valued the free will o f h u m a n beings, a n d
their ideas c a m e t o be m o r e a n d m o r e m a n - c e n t r e d , t o consider ' m a n
as the measure o f all t h i n g s ' . All the richness and creativity o f
R e n a i s s a n c e art and literature has been until recently generally
considered t o have been the p r o d u c t o f this n e w freedom o f m a n -
centred t h o u g h t . It goes w i t h o u t saying t h a t such a w a y o f thinking
m u s t have c o m e in c o n f l i c t with the R o m a n C h u r c h . In f a c t ,
H u m a n i s t t h o u g h t developed along t w o lines. O n e w a s the r e f o r m o f
the Papacy, w h i c h envisaged significant changes in doctrine as well
as the correcting o f such well k n o w n abuses as the selling o f
indulgences a n d benefices. T h i s b r a n c h o f H u m a n i s m emerged as the
R e f o r m a t i o n a n d reached its c u l m i n a t i o n in 1 5 1 7 w h e n it resulted in
the f o r m a t i o n o f the P r o t e s t a n t c h u r c h e s . T h e s e i n d e p e n d e n t
churches h a d a powerful (if dangerous) appeal t o m a n y m o n a r c h s
w h o were still c a u g h t up in their p o w e r struggle with the Papacy.
M a n y e m b r a c e d one o f the Protestant faiths a n d imposed it o n their
subjects for secular r e a s o n s . T h e o t h e r line o f H u m a n i s t t h o u g h t
devoted its attention t o secular matters a n d developed the techniques
o f critical analysis and e x p e r i m e n t a l investigation. M o d e r n critical
scholarship a n d the scientific m e t h o d a r e , in p a r t , descended f r o m
this w a y o f thinking.
T h e position o f C a t h o l i c Scholasticism w a s m u c h m o r e c o m p l e x .
W h i l e H u m a n i s m w a s n e w with the R e n a i s s a n c e , the C h u r c h w a s an
established institution. It h a d filled the vacuum left by the demise o f
the R o m a n E m p i r e , and had been the only agency t o hold E u r o p e a n
society together during the D a r k Ages. It h a d acquired substantial
secular p o w e r and materialistic interests in the process; and its
scholastic p h i l o s o p h y supported these as well as the religious
doctrines o f Latin C h r i s t e n d o m . As we shall see, there w a s within the
C h u r c h substantial recognition o f the need f o r r e f o r m , b o t h in terms
o f correcting the corrupt practices and revitalising the doctrines. It
would appear that the inertia which a c c o m p a n i e d the Church's
materialistic interests prevented the effective interior r e f o r m w h i c h
might have m a d e the Protestant R e f o r m a t i o n unnecessary. W h e n
internal r e f o r m did c o m e t o the C a t h o l i c C h u r c h it w a s in response
to the open rebellion o f the Protestant churches, and it t o o k the f o r m
of the C o u n t e r - R e f o r m a t i o n .
T h e C o u n t e r - R e f o r m a t i o n had three m a i n objectives: the long
overdue internal r e f o r m ; the re-establishment o f Papal authority
throughout E u r o p e ; and the eradication o f the Protestant heresy. T h e
internal reform w a s apparently very real. T h e doctrines were restated
.it the Council o f T r e n t between 1 5 4 5 and 1 5 7 3 , a n d several O r d e r s ,
such as the Ursulines, C a p u c h i n s a n d the Jesuits were f o r m e d . T h e
I.liter Order, in particular, was effective in teaching the doctrines and
enforcing the prohibition o f abuses w h i c h emerged f r o m the C o u n c i l .
This internal r e f o r m did m u c h t o slow the g r o w t h o f the Protestant
c h u r c h e s a n d t o r e - e s t a b l i s h t h e C a t h o l i c C h u r c h ' s spiritual
orientation. T h e re-establishment o f the Papal authority over the
Protestant States o f E u r o p e t o o k the f o r m o f the military operation
we k n o w as the T h i r t y Y e a r s ' War. It was under-taken by the C a t h o l i c
League under the leadership o f the H a b s b u r g rulers o f Spain and
Austria. It certainly failed in its objective t o re-convert Protestant
I'urope t o C a t h o l i c i s m . It s u c c e e d e d o n l y in e x h a u s t i n g the
p a r t i c i p a n t s a n d h a r d e n i n g t h e p o s i t i o n s o f b o t h sides. T h e
eradication o f heresy was the task o f the Papal Inquisition. T h a t
institution w a s reconstituted in 1 5 4 2 and (to-gether with the inciting
of witch-crazes) during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries it
effectively eliminated all traces o f Protestants f r o m Italy, Spain and
I* ranee.
In this brief sketch o f the conventional a n d generally familiar view
of the R e n a i s s a n c e one sees the C a t h o l i c and Protestant churches,
together with the princes w h o supported t h e m , expending their
energies in religious conflicts and terminating the intellectual and
artistic R e n a i s s a n c e in the process. M e a n w h i l e , the m o r e secularly
inclined H u m a n i s t bides his time, adapts t o the changing situation,
and emerges in the relative stability o f the mid-to-late seventeenth
century t o found such institutions as the R o y a l Society, establish the
physical sciences and m a k e w a y for the Age o f R e a s o n .
Within the last thirty years it has b e c o m e increasingly clear that
I his generally accepted view o f the Renaissance and its philosophies
is incomplete. C o n t e m p o r a r y scholarship has s h o w n that, in addition
to the C a t h o l i c and H u m a n i s t viewpoints, there w a s a third b o d y o f
thought which had a p r o f o u n d influence on the period. T h i s w o r k
has centred on the researches conducted at the W a r b u r g Institute at
t he University o f L o n d o n and particularly o n the w o r k o f Frances A.
Yates. M o s t o f the material w h i c h follows is derived f r o m her w o r k .
See especially her b o o k s The Occult Philosophy in the Elizabethan
Age (Ark edition, 1 9 8 3 ) , The Art of Memory (Ark edition, 1 9 8 4 ) ,
The Rosicrucian Enlightenment (Ark edition, 1 9 8 3 ) , and Giordano
Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition (Routledge &c K e g a n Paul, 1 9 6 4 ) .
T h i s third b o d y o f t h o u g h t w a s based o n a c o m b i n a t i o n o f
N e o p l a t o n i c a n d H e b r e w mystical philosophy w h i c h w a s very old (or
t h o u g h t to be very old) and which emerged f r o m the H u m a n i s t
r e d i s c o v e r y o f t h e C l a s s i c a l w o r l d . It is i m p o r t a n t f o r o u r
consideration because it is beginning t o appear t h a t this third body o f
t h o u g h t m a y have been a m a j o r factor in the cultural development o f
the R e n a i s s a n c e . It was certainly central t o m u c h o f the intellectual
life o f the period, and it c a m e into p r o m i n e n c e because o f the capture
o f t w o cities.
In 1 4 5 3 the city o f C o n s t a n t i n o p l e w a s captured by the T u r k s . As
a result o f this loss to Christendom a large n u m b e r o f manuscripts
w h i c h had been salvaged f r o m the libraries o f that city f o u n d their
w a y via the M e d i t e r r a n e a n trade routes t o the prosperous mercantile
centres o f Italy and in particular t o the culturally brilliant court o f
C o s i m o di M e d i c i w h o s e family ruled Florence m o r e o r less openly
f r o m 1 4 3 4 . T h e s e manuscripts included the writings o f Plato and a
n u m b e r o f neo-platonic w o r k s f r o m the second and third centuries
A D . T h e s e latter documents m a y have originated in the neo-platonic
schools at Alexandria where their authors could have acquired the
influence o f Hellenised J u d a i s m which s o m e o f the texts exhibit. T h e y
are, in any case, written in an apparently Egyptian f o r m , a n d
comprise the m a i n b o d y o f a literature o f mystical experience which
is currently called the H e r m e t i c a . T h e c o s m o s is presented in these
w o r k s in an astrological idiom, which w a s easily accessible t o the
fifteenth-century E u r o p e a n Christian; and the writings relate t o the
application o f divine laws, expressed in astrological terms, t o the
individual's life and experience.
M a r c i l i o F i c i n o , the Italian physician, priest and scholar, w h o
translated the H e r m e t i c documents for his M e d i c i employers, w a s
convinced that these writings were Greek translations o f the w o r k o f
H e r m e s Trismegistus, w h o m he c o n c e i v e d t o be a n E g y p t i a n
c o n t e m p o r a r y o f M o s e s . T o this devout R e n a i s s a n c e scholar w h o w a s
steeped in the doctrine that w h a t w a s old w a s holy because it w a s
closer t o m a n in his Edenic state, such a d o c u m e n t must have h a d a
sanctity almost o n a par with the scripture itself. As his translations
revealed concepts w h i c h appear in b o t h Platonic philosophy and
Christian doctrine, Ficino ( w h o h a d n o knowledge o f the d o c u m e n t s '
real origin) b e c a m e convinced that he w a s w o r k i n g with the basic
material which h a d been transmitted to Plato via Pythagoras and w a s
actually a pagan prophecy which foretold Christianity. This
interpretation w a s convenient because it m a d e the study and use o f
I U'rmetic material acceptable in the eyes o f the C h u r c h . T h e antiquity
ill the H e r m e t i c a based o n Ficino's erroneous beliefs, continued t o be
k u ccpted until early in the seventeenth century.
In 1 4 9 2 the city o f G r a n a d a w a s captured by the forces o f
lerdinand and Isabella. It w a s the last o f the M o o r i s h strongholds in
Spain and its fall opened the w a y for the implementation o f
Torquemada's policy o f 'an all Christian Spain', a policy which
resulted in the expulsion (or enforced conversion) o f Spanish J e w s
>uid M u s l i m s . T h e expulsions m a r k e d the end o f several centuries o f
remarkable philosophical and cultural development. Until the latter
part of the fifteenth century Christian, M u s l i m and J e w had lived in
Spain in close p r o x i m i t y and in relative peace and harmony. In cities
such as Toledo and C o r d o b a m a n y ideas h a d been exchanged
between K a b b a l i s t s , Sufis and Christian mystics, ideas w h i c h h a d a
profound effect on the development o f each region. T h i s situation o f
religious tolerance and mutual respect deteriorated gradually with the
progress o f the Christian reconquest o f Spain. Even before the
expulsion in 1 4 9 2 life h a d been increasingly difficult for Spanish
lews, and there was a steady trickle o f emigration t o m o r e hospitable
countries including Italy. T h e r e must have been K a b b a l i s t s a m o n g
I hose early emigrants because as early as 1 4 8 6 Pico della M i r a n d o l a ,
another o f the neoplatonists in the M e d i c i circle, m a d e his f a m o u s
offer t o reconcile nine hundred theses which he had derived f r o m
Christian, Hebrew, M u s l i m and pagan sources. A m o n g these were
seventy-two K a b b a l i s t i c propositions which, in Pico's view, showed
I lebrew support f o r the Christian religion. In fact, Pico practiced a
form o f f i f t e e n t h - c e n t u r y S p a n i s h K a b b a l a h w h i c h he h a d
Christianised by proving (at least t o his o w n satisfaction) with
K a b b a l i s t i c a r g u m e n t t h a t J e s u s w a s t h e M e s s i a h . L i k e his
I Iermeticist colleague, F i c i n o , Pico found in K a b b a l a h a c o n f i r m a t i o n
of the tenets o f Christianity which m a d e its practice acceptable to the
(church.
It m a y seem strange that the C h u r c h , which w a s to re-establish the
Inquisition in 1 5 4 2 f o r the very purpose o f c o m b a t i n g these 'heresies',
should be willing t o permit and even encourage their practice a r o u n d
1 5 0 0 . T o understand this, one must recognise a point w h i c h w a s (and
still is) fundamental t o Christian doctrine. In the Christian view the
Old T e s t a m e n t is considered t o be a prophecy o f the N e w . If we
examine the Christian year we find that each festival celebrates n o t
only an event in the life o f Christ, but also the event in the O l d
Testament which is t h o u g h t t o foretell it. F r o m this p o i n t o f view
additional prophetic material f r o m J e w i s h and pagan sources w a s t o
be expected, and might actually be seen to strengthen the position of
Christianity. Moreover, such non-Christian material could be (and
was) used as powerful argument and justification for the conversion
o f J e w s and others to Christianity; an activity to which the C h u r c h
gave m u c h a t t e n t i o n . O n e gets the i m p r e s s i o n t h a t t h e re-
establishment o f the Inquisition in 1 5 4 2 was as much a reaction to
the s e c u l a r s i t u a t i o n , w h i c h had g o t o u t o f h a n d w i t h the
establishment o f Protestant states, as it was to the non-Christian
doctrines themselves. In fact, as the H e r m e t i c a b e c a m e m o r e
generally available and Kabbalistic documents flooded into Italy after
1492, many prominent churchmen considered the
Hermetic/Kabbalistic tradition as an appropriate basis for the
internal reform of the C h u r c h , and produced a widely distributed
literature on the subject.
F r a n c e s c o Giorgi was such a m a n . H e was an aristocratic Venetian,
a friar o f the Franciscan Order, and a scholar o f considerable
reputation. H e was also active in the political life o f Venice for which
he undertook several diplomatic assignments. In 1 5 2 5 he published
D e H a r m o n i a M u n d i , a b o o k in which he integrated Pico's Christian
K a b b a l a h , new H e b r e w sources available f r o m Spanish refugees, and
his o w n Franciscan mysticism. In this w o r k , we find such concepts as
hierarchy o f worlds, the plan o f a building being used as the model of
the universe, an astrological frame o f reference, and m a n considered
as the m i c r o c o s m o f the universal m a c r o c o s m . M o r e important,
Giorgi also m a k e s the M o n a s , the Divine O n e , the central focus o f his
w o r k . This Franciscan, w h o was a participant in the main stream of
Italian political and artistic life, was also in the main stream of
Hermetic/Kabbalistic thought which he proposed as a basis o f
C a t h o l i c d o c t r i n a l r e f o r m . H e a l s o i n f l u e n c e d the G e r m a n
H u m a n i s t s , and was o f great influence in Elizabethan England.
T h e s e early Italian followers o f the Hermetic/Kabbalistic tradition
were Catholics seeking to revitalise the C a t h o l i c C h u r c h by means o f
an infusion o f a Classical mystical tradition. W e c a n find a similar
turn o f mind in G e r m a n y in the w o r k o f J o h a n n e s Reuchlin, a
H u m a n i s t scholar w h o produced t w o b o o k s in the tradition o f
Christianised K a b b a l a h . T h e second, D e Arte C a b a l i s t i c a , w a s
published in 1 5 1 7 . T h e w o r k is i m p o r t a n t as the first c o m p l e t e
treatment o f J e w i s h mysticism t o be written by a non-Jew, and was to
become a fundamental w o r k for Christian Kabbalists. T h e
appearance o f the b o o k in the same year that Luther posted his these?
on the church d o o r in Wittenberg associates Reuchlin with the starl
o f the R e f o r m a t i o n . Unlike Luther, w h o w a s proposing radical
changes in the Church's doctrine, Reuchlin's r e f o r m sought t o provide
a virile replacement f o r the sterile scholastic a p p r o a c h t o C a t h o l i c
ihcology. C o r n e l i u s A g r i p p a s e e m s , in t h e light o f m o d e r n
scholarship, to have h a d a point o f view and an objective very similar
to that o f Reuchlin. Agrippa is i m p o r t a n t f o r three reasons. First, he
was a H u m a n i s t , and is k n o w n t o have been in E n g l a n d in 1 5 1 0 and
associated with T h o m a s M o r e , J o h n C o l e t and the beginnings o f
I English H u m a n i s m . S e c o n d , he w r o t e D e O c c u l t a Philosophia which
presents K a b b a l a h in a Christian perspective similar to that o f
Keuchlin and P i c o . Agrippa described himself as an ' E r a s m i a n ' and
'obedient t o the C h u r c h ' ; he is certainly n o t an atheist but rather a
preacher of idealistic reform in the context of the
I lermetic/Kabbalistic t r a d i t i o n . T h e third thing t o n o t e a b o u t
Agrippa is that he is popularly remembered as the archetypal black
magician and conjurer o f d e m o n s , and until recently he has been
considered by scholars t o be u n w o r t h y o f serious consideration. T h i s
reputation is based largely o n the writings o f C o u n t e r - R e f o r m a t i o n
authors, and particularly o n the w o r k o f the Jesuit, M a r t i n del R i o ;
these are hardly unbiased sources. T h e quite different picture o f
Agrippa which is emerging f r o m c o n t e m p o r a r y research suggests that
assassination o f c h a r a c t e r w a s c o m m o n p l a c e in the sixteenth century.
It is important t o recognise this, as it seems likely that a similar
defamation o f c h a r a c t e r happened t o the English Christian K a b b a l i s t ,
|ohn D e e .
The Renaissance came late to England, and the
I lermetic/Kabbalistic tradition h a d already b e c o m e well developed
and established o n the C o n t i n e n t by the time Elizabeth I ascended t o
the throne. A m o n g the courtiers w h o surrounded Elizabeth were a
number o f m e n w h o were very m u c h involved with t h a t body o f
thought. A m o n g these w a s J o h n D e e w h o appears t o have h a d a great
deal m o r e influence o n the thinking o f the English R e n a i s s a n c e than
has been generally recognised. Until recently historians have n o t
given J o h n D e e serious consideration because his reputation is that o f
a credulous R e n a i s s a n c e magician w h o died in poverty and was
deluded by his o w n efforts t o conjure d e m o n s . It is true that D e e fell
on hard times t o w a r d the end o f his life, but it is also clear that m u c h
of his bad fortune w a s due t o the fearful, superstitious attitudes o f
lames I. Dee's unsavoury reputation is largely due t o the w o r k o f
Merc C a s a u b o n w h o appears t o have written a destructive and
heavily biased b o o k , some forty years after Dee's death, in order t o
iichieve objectives o f his o w n . F o r material which re-establishes Dee's
reputation, see Peter J . French, J o h n D e e (Routledge &c K e g a n Paul,
1 9 7 2 ) . D e e is o f interest t o us because he epitomises the thinking
w h i c h characterised sixteenth-century England.
Until 1 5 8 3 , w h e n he left England for a t o u r o f the C o n t i n e n t ,
J o h n D e e w a s one o f the m o s t highly respected English scholars, an
influential advisor t o Elizabeth I, and closely associated with m a n y o f
the m o s t powerful people in the land, the same people w h o were
responsible f o r the English R e n a i s s a n c e . H i s library, w h i c h is
acknowledged t o have been the greatest in England at the time,
contained nearly four thousand items, and was frequently visited by
the m o s t influential m e n o f the period. Although m u c h o f his writing
related t o applied m a t h e m a t i c s and navigation, his library is k n o w n
t o have contained Hermetic/Kabbalistic documents including such
w o r k s as De Harmonia Mundi and De Occulta Philosophia. Almost
all his o w n w o r k reflects his p r o f o u n d interest in mystical subjects
and shows the influence o f Agrippa, Reuchlin and particularly
Giorgi. T h e essence o f J o h n Dee's thought appears to be contained in
his f a m o u s Preface t o the English edition o f Euclid, published in
1 5 7 0 . T h i s is a thoroughly neo-platonic w o r k with m a n y q u o t a t i o n s
f r o m Pico della Mirandola. It uses the K a b b a l i s t i c c o s m o l o g y o f
Agrippa and gives fundamental priority t o the M o n a s , the O n e , as the
representation o f Divinity. W e have seen this last theme in Giorgi's
w o r k ; and for D e e , w h o s a w the Divine Presence pervading the
Universe, it was t o b e c o m e the single idea, central t o all his w o r k . D e e
w a s by n o means the only m e m b e r o f the English intelligentsia t o be
interested in the Hermetic/Kabbalistic tradition; and if he w a s
influenced by the w o r k o n the C o n t i n e n t , he also affected the views
o f his colleagues. H e is k n o w n t o have been an i m p o r t a n t m e m b e r o f
Sidney's circle, C h a p m a n , Spenser and Shakespeare all s h o w evidence
o f a familiarity with his ideas and with Hermetica in general. So also
do B a c o n , M i l t o n , Fludd and later Elias A s h m o l e .
Dee's view o f the w o r l d , w h i c h is c o m i n g t o be recognised in m a n y
ways as typical o f the R e n a i s s a n c e philosophers o f his s c h o o l , is a
provocative o n e . H e seemed t o see the universe as a sort o f spectrum
o f p h e n o m e n a with the Deity, the universal source, at one e x t r e m e
and extending through 'celestial' a n d 'planetary' realms t o gross
materiality at the other. H e w a s convinced that m a n could operate
within this spectrum o f p h e n o m e n a t o produce useful and beneficial
effects; and the interest in m a g i c , w h i c h occupied D e e and m a n y (but
n o t all) Renaissance thinkers, derived f r o m this conviction. M a g i c
appears t o have had a s o m e w h a t different meaning t o D e e and his
colleagues than it does today. T h e y seem n o t t o m a k e the same
distinction between material, planetary and celestial w o r l d s ; and
operations in any o f them were considered t o be ' m a g i c a l ' . T h u s
devices w h i c h w e w o u l d call m e c h a n i c a l or hydraulic were termed
examples o f ' m e c h a n i c a l m a g i c ' . In spite o f the general interest in
magic a m o n g p r o m i n e n t scholars o f the period, there were those w h o
studied the Hermetic/Kabbalistic tradition while avoiding magic
altogether. Indeed, K a b b a l a h in its pure f o r m is very strict in its
opposition t o the use o f magical practices t o achieve one's personal
ends. Since the C r a f t evolved in an era when magical concepts were
prominent in c o n t e m p o r a r y t h o u g h t , w e c a n e x p e c t it t o have some
position on the subject. As we e x a m i n e the symbolic structure we will
find that M a s o n s are instructed t o leave m a g i c a l o n e . It is also
interesting t o recall t h a t C. G . J u n g has pointed out that m u c h
Renaissance t h o u g h t , particularly in the area o f alchemy, is relevant
to c o n t e m p o r a r y psychology. It m a y be that additional research will
reveal that 'planetary m a g i c ' w a s a primitive research into psychology
and w h a t we call p a r a n o r m a l p h e n o m e n a today. Peter French has
called the Hermetic/Kabbalistic revival the ' d a w n o f the scientific a g e '
(ibid., p , 8 6 ) . If that be so, it seems strange that o u r science-based
society should be so ignorant o f the subject, and we will benefit by
giving attention t o the circumstances surrounding its decline.
As one might expect, the Hermetic/Kabbalistic tradition did n o t
prosper in C o n t i n e n t a l E u r o p e during the C o u n t e r - R e f o r m a t i o n .
When the C o u n c i l o f T r e n t defined the doctrines within which the
Catholic C h u r c h w o u l d r e f o r m itself, other proposals f o r change
(including the w o r k o f all the thinkers mentioned a b o v e ) were
proscribed. Even the w o r k o f such staunch believers as F r a n c e s c o
(iiorgi, which h a d been acceptable as late as 1 5 4 5 , w a s censored. In
the y e a r s f o l l o w i n g 1600 many other followers of the
Hermetic/Kabbalistic school were burned either by the Inquisition
itself, the C a t h o l i c (or Protestant) armies participating in the T h i r t y
Years' War, o r in the witch-scares, which were used as an instrument
of policy t o eliminate heretics. T h e situation b e c a m e m u c h worse for
the H e r m e t i c school w h e n , in 1 6 1 4 , Isaac C a s a u b o n , using his newly
developed H u m a n i s t technique o f critical scholarship, established the
correct date o f the Hermetica as second or third century A D .
Although a powerful interest in H e r m e t i c material remained, o n e
could n o longer use the n o t i o n o f H e r m e s Trismegistus as a pagan
prophet o f Christianity as a defence against heresy, and the risks
attending the study o f H e r m e t i c material increased markedly.
T h e situation w a s rather different in England, which w a s beyond
the reach o f the Inquisition. As we have seen, interest in the
Hermetic/Kabbalistic tradition continued m o r e openly. In the mid-
seventeenth century Elias Ashmole's writings s h o w that he was
thoroughly conversant with Dee's w o r k and c o n c e r n s (and that he
shared t h e m h i m s e l f ) , a n d N e w t o n ' s interests in the mystical
traditions are well k n o w n . Still, England was by n o means entirely
free o f conflict and religious prejudice. In the mid-seventeenth
century the Civil W a r w a s an actual presence, witch crazes were a
distinct possibility (indeed, an occasional event), and the conflicts
between C a t h o l i c and Protestant m o n a r c h s were the reality o f living
memory. It seems likely that the founders o f the R o y a l Society chose
t o give their attention to the physical sciences where differences o f
opinion could be resolved by the results o f experiments in the
laboratory, and t o ignore the m o r e philosophical considerations
w h i c h had led to conflict before. If the R o y a l Society h a d e m b r a c e d
the entire spectrum o f Hermetic/Kabbalistic endeavour (which its
charter is certainly framed t o a c c o m m o d a t e ) , one might speculate
that psychology w o u l d have developed m u c h earlier t h a n it did and
the conflict between science and the C h u r c h might have been avoided
entirely. As it happened, the nature o f the times determined t h a t the
physical w o r l d was t o be e x a m i n e d openly a n d o t h e r realms
('planetary' and 'celestial') were t o be investigated privately - in the
safety o f one's o w n group o f friends.
This brief overview of Renaissance thought and the
Hermetic/Kabbalistic tradition omits m a n y facets o f the subject; f o r
e x a m p l e , alchemy and the R o s i c r u c i a n m o v e m e n t are n o t mentioned
at all. It certainly does n o t ' p r o v e ' , through the tenuous c o n n e c t i o n o f
Elias A s h m o l e , that F r e e m a s o n r y is a M y s t e r y tradition. It does
introduce a c o n c e p t w h i c h is n o t part o f general k n o w l e d g e , but
w h i c h is b e c o m i n g increasingly clear t o serious historians: that the
Hermetic/Kabbalistic tradition w a s a m o d e o f t h o u g h t w h i c h was
fundamental t o the R e n a i s s a n c e a n d widely accepted t h r o u g h o u t
E u r o p e at the time. It also reveals the frame o f mind t h a t w a s
prevalent in England during the period and a m o n g the people w h o
would have been the originators o f the Speculative C r a f t . O n this
basis, we will turn t o o n e o f the original w o r k s o f this tradition t o
find a c o n t e x t within w h i c h t o interpret the Craft's symbolism.
3. COSMOLOGY
'.... f r o m a point t o a line, f r o m a line t o a superficies, and f r o m a
superficies t o a solid' is a phrase familiar t o every M a s o n a b o v e the
rank o f Fellowcraft. B u t here we t a k e the c o n c e p t n o t f r o m the
Lecture o f the Second Degree, but f r o m the Fons Vitae written by the
Spanish K a b b a l i s t , S o l o m o n ibn G a b i r o l . Ibn G a b i r o l , w h o lived and
worked in M a l a g a a r o u n d the middle o f the eleventh century, w a s
one o f the first philosophers t o teach n e o p l a t o n i s m o n the continent
of E u r o p e . H e w a s also instrumental in reformulating the J e w i s h
Mystical tradition, w h i c h h a d been up until that time essentially
devotional in its a p p r o a c h , into the metaphysical structure w h i c h was
to emerge later as Spanish K a b b a l a h . T h e G e o m e t r i c progression
mentioned in the q u o t a t i o n is a n e o p l a t o n i c image w h i c h w a s widely
used by Kabbalists in medieval Spain t o describe the process by w h i c h
I he relative universe c o m e s into existence. Although this c o n c e p t is
not introduced into the Craft's symbolism until the S e c o n d Degree,
we will introduce it here because it typifies the Hermetic/Kabbalistic
cosmology w h i c h , as we have seen, w a s o f i m p o r t a n c e in R e n a i s s a n c e
thought. It thus forms a b a c k g r o u n d for our consideration o f the
(!raft's symbolic structure.
T h e J e w i s h tradition is unusually reticent w h e n it c o m e s t o talking
about G o d . ' G o d is G o d , and w h a t is there t o c o m p a r e with G o d ? ' is
a rabbinical q u o t a t i o n which describes the traditional attitude pretty
well. T h i s cautious turn o f mind seems t o be derived f r o m the idea
that if one assigns an attribute t o G o d , one implies that G o d lacks the
opposite attribute. F o r e x a m p l e , if o n e says ' G o d is merciful' one
might suggest that in his mercy G o d might o m i t t o administer justice,
lint the n o t i o n o f a G o d w h o is n o t just is inconsistent with an infinite
( i o d , which is equally unacceptable. T h e solution t o this p r o b l e m is
not to try t o assign attributes t o G o d at all. W e c a n n o t properly
assign even the attribute o f existence t o G o d because existence is a
concept w h i c h we c a n understand, discuss, and define (or at least
agree on the differences between our definitions). W e c a n hold the
concept o f existence in our heads, and t o assign such a limited quality
to G o d is inconsistent with his limitless nature. G o d is G o d a n d is
considered t o be beyond even existence. In H e b r e w , the w o r d for G o d
is Ay in, which means ' N o T h i n g ' and also its c o m p l e m e n t , Ayin Sof,
which means ' W i t h o u t E n d ' . T h a t , for us, is a l m o s t all that c a n be
known a b o u t G o d .
There is a difficulty with this sort o f thinking, however, because a
limitless G o d must infuse all existence a n d , indeed, the history o f
human religious experience suggests that G o d does just t h a t . T h i s
difficulty w a s resolved by the idea o f the relative universe. T h e oral
tradition has it that ' G o d wished to behold G o d ' and t o this end the
boundlessness which is G o d withdrew f r o m a dimensionless dot, t o
create a void within w h i c h something might exist. T h a t something
was to be the relative universe which is the m i r r o r within w h i c h ' G o d
will behold G o d ' . T h e void was the first thing t o exist. Into this void,
the Will o f G o d projected itself as several principles - there are ten in
the K a b b a l i s t i c system. T h e s e 'Divine Principles', ' T h e G a r m e n t s o f
G o d ' , ' T h e Faces o f G o d ' , ' T h e Divine Potencies', as they are
variously called, organised themselves into a specific relationship
w h i c h c o n t a i n e d , in potential, all the universe which w a s t o c o m e into
being, together with the laws by which t h a t universe w a s t o be
governed. T h i s set o f related principles which exists n e x t t o the Deity
is called, in Hebrew, Azilut w h i c h means ' t o stand n e a r ' and is said t o
be the 'Image o f G o d ' , the ' G l o r y o f G o d ' , the Divine W o r l d . T h i s
Divine W o r l d o f Azilut is n o t a w o r l d as we k n o w it. It is a world
c o m p o s e d entirely o f Consciousness. It is timeless, in the sense that
there is n o time there. It exists so long as the H o l y O n e wills it t o
exist, thus to us it is eternal. In the Classical, four-element universe
which is c o m m o n t o m o s t ancient M i d d l e Eastern cultures, this world
o f pure consciousness w a s represented by light o r fire, and in our
geometric progression it is represented by the Point.
T h e world o f Azilut, the Image o f G o d , is sometimes called A d a m
K a d m o n , the Primordial M a n . T h e illustration reproduced as Figure
2 is a b o u t as close t o an a n t h r o p o m o r p h i c representation o f G o d as
J u d a i s m ever gets. It is called ' H a Shem H a M e f o r a s h ' , the Special
N a m e , and is the same Divine N a m e which appears o n the (Harris)
Second Degree Tracing B o a r d , but here it is arranged in vertical f o r m .
W h e n displayed in this f o r m it is said t o represent A d a m K a d m o n , the
Primordial M a n , and f r o m it we c a n derive s o m e o f the laws by which
the emerging universe is t o be governed.
T h e first is the L a w o f Unity. Although the diagram is c o m p o s e d o f
various c o m p o n e n t s they f o r m a single, c o h e r e n t , c o m p l e t e thing - the
Special N a m e . N e x t c o m e the L a w o f Opposites and the R u l e o f
T h r e e , b o t h o f w h i c h are represented in the Divine N a m e by the three
columns formed by the vertical strokes in the c h a r a c t e r s . T h e L a w o f
Opposites is implied by the t w o outside c o l u m n s . T h e right-hand
column is c o m p o s e d o f bold straight strokes and is said to be active,
creative, expansive, merciful a n d masculine. Left t o its o w n devices
this expansive principle w o u l d dissipate itself into the void. It is,
however, c o m p l e m e n t e d by the left-hand c o l u m n , which is c o m p o s e d
o f g r a c e f u l , yielding s t r o k e s , said t o be p a s s i v e , c o n t a i n i n g ,
conserving, severe and feminine. By itself the passive principle w o u l d
i m p l o d e because it is entirely constraining. T h e s e t w o outside
i olinnns contain in potential all the pairs o f contrasting p h e n o m e n a
*t ilir u n e r r i n g universe. T h e y are t o be held in b a l a n c e by a
M M iliiiiiii|f ti^riicy implied by the central C o l u m n o f Consciousness, in
I lie middle o f the N a m e . Its task is t o hold the other t w o (and the
m i ire universe) in dynamic b a l a n c e . T h e N a m e is c o m p o s e d o f four
i ha meters. T h e y represent four levels within the Divine W o r l d . T h e s e
A\C called the Levels o f Divine A c t i o n , Divine E m o t i o n , Divine
Intellect and a C o n t a c t with the Deity and are seen as the source o f
I lie four worlds w h i c h will comprise the relative universe. W e should
not fall into the trap o f thinking t h a t the laws derive f r o m the shape
ol the Divine N a m e . T h e K a b b a l i s t i c tradition is based o n the experi-
ence o f these laws by those w h o formulated it, and the H e b r e w
language and alphabet are said t o have been designed t o facilitate the
transmission o f the tradition. T h u s , the Special N a m e in its vertical
l o r m should be regarded a an aide-memoire written in a language
designed specifically for the c o n s t r u c t i o n o f such sacred models. T h e
letters in this f o r m represent the laws, but are n o t t o be thought o f as
the source o f the laws.
This divine world o f Azilut is pure, innocent a n d perfect because
ol its p r o x i m i t y t o the Deity. W h i l e all things exist in Azilut in
potential, they c a n n o t manifest. N o t h i n g happens in this w o r l d
because it is static, unchanging, perfect. In order t h a t the relative
universe c a n accomplish its task o f reflecting G o d , A d a m K a d m o n
must experience all things; and t o facilitate that process a w h o l e new
world, the World o f C r e a t i o n , c o m e s into existence, H e r e t o f o r e , we
have been w o r k i n g with the oral tradition, but with the process o f
(Creation we m o v e t o the written tradition w h i c h is c o n t a i n e d in the
Torah - the first five b o o k s o f the Bible. T h e first chapter o f Genesis
starts with the w o r d s 'In the beginning G o d c r e a t e d . . . . ' , in H e b r e w
'herashit b a r a E l o h i m . . . . ' and in these first w o r d s we have a
contradiction w h i c h we must resolve. E l o h i m is a plural f o r m ,
meaning literally ' m a n y G o d s ' , b u t J u d a i s m is a m i l i t a n t l y
monotheistic religion. T h e resolution o f this conflict points us b a c k t o
i he oral tradition. T h e w o r d E l o h i m refers t o the ten principles, the
' l a c e s ' o r G a r m e n t s o f G o d ' w h i c h were originally e m a n a t e d t o f o r m
the Divine W o r l d . C r e a t i o n is seen t o be effected by the agency o f
Divine Will operating through these ten principles. T h u s , the W o r l d
of Creation is seen as springing forth f r o m the centre o f the Divine
World.
T h e w o r d Creation has a m o r e precise, and therefore m o r e
restricted meaning in this c o n t e x t than it has in ordinary (even
ordinary religious) usage. H e r e it refers specifically and exclusively to
this second world which springs f r o m the primordial world o f A d a m
Kadmon. T h i s World o f Creation unfolds according t o the description
in the first chapter o f Genesis. As the first world o f separation f r o m
the static perfection o f Divinity, it is a world o f change. It is the
beginning o f time and space, o f g o o d and evil, and o f all the other
relative concepts which comprise the universe in which we live.
Creation - that is, the second world - unfolds according to the pattern
established in the Divine World o f Azilut, and it is completed in seven
days - o r steps - but again, we are n o t speaking o f the ordinary
physical world with which we are familiar. As the world o f E m a n a t i o n
is a world o f Consciousness, so the World o f Creation is a world o f
Spirit, o f ideas, o f essences, o f energy. It is Heaven in J e w i s h
terminology; the Celestial world in Renaissance terms. T h e World o f
the Spirit is governed by the same set o f laws as those which we
observed in the Divine W o r l d . It has unity, in that it is a consistent
w h o l e , it has active and passive aspects which are co-ordinated by a
conscious element, and it has four levels; action, e m o t i o n , intellect and
a c o n t a c t with the source - in this case the C r e a t o r at the centre o f the
Divine W o r l d . In the Kabbalistic tradition, this world is inhabited
(largely) by archangels w h o perform the active and passive celestial
functions. In the classical four-element universe it is the World o f Air.
It is the Line in the Craft's geometric progression.
W h e n C r e a t i o n w a s complete a third world derived f r o m its centre
in the same w a y that C r e a t i o n w a s derived f r o m the midst o f Divinity.
T h e second chapter o f Genesis has a real similarity t o the first and
some scholars pass it o f f as repetition for emphasis. It is i m p o r t a n t t o
n o t e , however, that whereas in Genesis 1 , the w o r l d is 'created', the
operative verb in Genesis 2 is ' f o r m e d ' . T h e repetitive nature o f the
t e x t tells us that the same laws w h i c h are f o u n d in the Divine and
Spiritual Worlds will also operate in this n e w w o r l d . But there is a
world o f difference between C r e a t i o n and F o r m a t i o n . T h e W o r l d o f
F o r m a t i o n is the 'Planetary' w o r l d in R e n a i s s a n c e terminology. In
K a b b a l i s t i c terminology it is called Paradise and Eden, a n d it is
inhabited by angels. H e r e , with the W o r l d o f F o r m s , we have reached
a level t o w h i c h w e c a n relate o u r o r d i n a r y e x p e r i e n c e s . In
c o n t e m p o r a r y terminology w e w o u l d call this w o r l d the psyche. It is
the realm o f Archetype and S y m b o l . In the Classical G r e e k idiom, it
is the w o r l d o f the gods w h o s e adventures depict the dynamics o f the
psyche in symbolic, mythical f o r m . Its ever changing images are
represented by the element W a t e r in the four element universe. T h i s
World o f F o r m a t i o n is symbolised by the Superficies in the Craft's
geometric progression and it is the world w h i c h is represented by the
symbolic structure o f the M a s o n i c L o d g e .
By a similar process a fourth w o r l d , the W o r l d o f Action c o m e s
into being f r o m the midst o f Paradise. T h i s is the physical w o r l d , and
W o r l d of:
Divinity
Fire
Calling
W o r l d of:
Spirit
Air
Creation
W o r l d of:
Psyche
Water
Formation
W o r l d of:
Physicality
Earth
Making
Figure 1
includes ' s p a c e ' a n d all the p h e n o m e n a w h i c h are the subject for
investigation by the physical sciences. It is called ' E a r t h ' in the
terminology o f the four-element universe, and the Solid in the
geometric progression. It is the w o r l d which m a n k i n d entered w h e n
he w a s sent out o f Eden (in Paradise) and given 'coats o f skin'
(bodies) - an event o f which we will have a great deal t o say in due
course.
W e c a n represent this scheme, t o a limited extent, in a diagram
such as the one s h o w n in Figure 1 . E a c h w o r l d is represented by a
circle, each being a successively grosser reflection o f the w o r l d a b o v e .
T h e uppermost p o i n t o n each circumference touches the centre o f the
circle a b o v e , reminding us that the source o f each w o r l d is the centre
o f the n e x t higher w o r l d . T h e worlds interpenetrate each other, as do
the elements w h i c h represent them. T h u s , Light penetrates Air, Air
dissolves in W a t e r ; and W a t e r saturates E a r t h . C o m m o n h u m a n
experience verifies the last o f these e x a m p l e s : the h u m a n psyche
seems t o permeate the body, but it is quite clear t h a t the psyche is n o t
a physical thing. It is also a c o m m o n experience for h u m a n beings t o
realise that the b o d y and psyche are t w o different things, that is, t o
realise, 'This is m y body. It is mine, but it is n o t m e . ' T h e dimension
which is represented by the vertical axis o f the diagram is the
' D i m e n s i o n o f C o n s c i o u s n e s s ' . At the b o t t o m is found the grossest
materiality f r o m w h i c h consciousness rises in gradual stages t o the
m o s t refined awareness o f Divinity at the t o p . T o the K a b b a l i s t this
model represents the entire relative universe, the w h o l e o f existence.
It is the ' t h a t ' in the Divine Utterance 'I a m that I a m ' , w h i c h brings
it into existence and holds it there.
T h e oral tradition has it t h a t all the universe, e x c e p t m a n k i n d
itself, w a s created, f o r m e d and m a d e in the three lower worlds.
H u m a n beings, it is said, existed as cells (so t o speak) in A d a m
K a d m o n - were m a d e in the Image o f G o d - w h e n c e they descend as
individual Divine Sparks through the three lower w o r l d s . In the
process o f this descent each Divine Spark is enwrapped in a Spirit as
it enters the W o r l d o f C r e a t i o n , the spirit is enclothed in a Soul as it
descends into the W o r l d o f F o r m a t i o n (psyche), and finally, it
acquires a body w h e n it incarnates. H e r e , in the farthest remove o f
physical existence, these individual h u m a n beings start the long
journey b a c k t o their Divine origin. T h i s is the task o f the h u m a n
being; as the scriptures have it ' f o r this you were called f o r t h , created,
f o r m e d and m a d e ' . W h e n each cell o f A d a m K a d m o n has returned t o
its original place A d a m K a d m o n will again be c o m p l e t e , as he was in
the beginning. But he will n o longer be i n n o c e n t and naive; rather he
will have the richness o f all experience, at w h i c h time G o d will
behold G o d in the M i r r o r o f E x i s t e n c e .
T h e c o s m o l o g y outlined a b o v e gives a r e a s o n a b l e , if rather
simplistic, view o f the K a b b a l i s t i c scheme o f the universe set out in
I he c o n t e m p o r a r y idiom (For a m o r e complete treatment o f this
subject see Z ' e v ben S h i m o n Halevi, A Kabbalistic Universe, Ryder,
1 >77). T h e assiduous reader c a n relate it t o the narrative in the B o o k
1
>l Genesis, and this will be the basic c o s m o l o g y t o which we will refer
throughout. T h e h u m a n being fits into this scheme o f things in a
unique w a y because he c a n , if he c h o o s e s t o do s o , operate
i onsciously in all four worlds - a capacity w h i c h is possessed by n o
oilier being. T o be conscious in all f o u r worlds is the subject taught
by t h e Mysteries, n o m a t t e r w h a t their idiom o r terminology f o r this
i oncept m a y be. F r o m this point o f view, the C r a f t o f F r e e m a s o n r y is
said to be a Lesser Mystery, since it deals with the W o r l d o f
l o r m a t i o n , that is, with the psyche, the m o r e elementary part o f this
process.
Before we leave this cosmology, we must t o u c h o n one m o r e
i oncept which is inherent in the scheme. T h e lecture in the Second
D e g r e e describes G e o m e t r y as 'a science w h e r e b y we find out the
M i n t e n t s o f bodies unmeasured by c o m p a r i n g them with those
ill ready measured'. T h i s is a statement o f the principle that m a n is the
microcosm o f the universe. It is a principle w h i c h is put even m o r e
succinctly as, 'As a b o v e , so b e l o w ' . W e have seen t h a t the same set o f
l a w s a r e said to apply in each o f the four worlds - they simply operate
dillcrently at different levels. W e have seen also that h u m a n beings
h a v e , within themselves, each o f these levels. T h e tradition has it that
l here is a resonance between events in each o f the worlds and that an
e v e n t in the physical world causes analogous events in the upper
worlds. T h i s idea o f resonance between worlds is the principle which
underlies the use o f c e r e m o n y and ritual. It c a n be verified easily - at
least for t h e c a u s e o f r e s o n a n c e b e t w e e n t h e p h y s i c a l a n d
psychological worlds - by c o m m o n experience. O n e has only t o view
ii well conducted ceremony, say the T r o o p i n g o f the Colour, and by
o b s e r v i n g one's o w n response, feel the reaction in the psyche t o the
e v e n t in the physical w o r l d . If the same person will w a t c h the
M o n a r c h place a w r e a t h at the C e n o t a p h or attend quietly the funeral
I a stranger at a village c h u r c h , he will learn quickly h o w ceremonies
i an be structured to produce specific and quite discrete psychological
e v e n t s . T h e s e are simple, straightforward exercises conducted with
M i m m o n l y available ceremonies t o verify the fact that suitably
d e s i g n e d rituals produce definite psychological states. Q u i t e subtle
rituals c a n be constructed using this principle o f resonance between
the w o r l d s , and the ceremonies o f the C r a f t are designed along these
lines. T h e y have been constructed with great care t o produce
psychological experiences which provide the candidate with an
insight into his psyche, while at the same time protecting him f r o m
the risks w h i c h are associated with e x p l o r a t i o n o f the W o r l d o f
F o r m a t i o n . H e r e we see one o f the principal reasons w h y the C r a f t is
so very reluctant t o introduce changes into its symbolic structure.
Well meaning changes t o the ritual introduced w i t h o u t a knowledge
o f their effect in the upper worlds could have a very detrimental
i m p a c t on the participants in the ceremonies.
T h i s brief sketch o f K a b b a l i s t i c c o s m o l o g y provides us with the
f r a m e o f reference we require. It is a fair view, in m o d e r n terms, o f
the conceptual f r a m e w o r k o f the Renaissance scholar w h o w a s
interested in his interior g r o w t h . W i t h this model o f the four worlds
and their interrelationships in the b a c k o f our minds we will l o o k in
a little m o r e detail at s o m e c o n t e m p o r a r y models o f the W o r l d o f
F o r m a t i o n , the psyche, the field o f study e m b r a c e d by the Craft's
symbolic structure.
4 PSYCHOLOGY
W e said in the preceding section that the M a s o n i c Lodge c a n be
considered t o be a model o f the Psychological W o r l d . M o r e precisely,
it is a model o f the h u m a n psyche, the h u m a n being as he exists in the
W o r l d o f F o r m a t i o n . In this sense we m a y think o f the C r a f t as an
antique, G o d - o r i e n t a t e d , psychology - as a sort o f science o f h u m a n
mental processes set o u r in a symbolic structure which m a y appear
quaint by m o d e r n standards but which is consistent and valid w h e n
considered in its o w n terms. W e might think o f its originators as
practitioners o f a discipline which w e w o u l d describe today as a
b r a n c h o f the a c a d e m i c field c a l l e d C o n s c i o u s n e s s R e s e a r c h .
However, if we are going t o consider the Craft as a sort o f psychology
(as we will be doing t h r o u g h o u t this b o o k ) , we must be very careful
in several respects. W e need t o understand clearly the differences
between the theories, aims and attitudes o f c o n t e m p o r a r y psychology
and those o f the C r a f t before we begin t o e x a m i n e the parallels
between the t w o .
In the first place, psychology as it is practiced in the twentieth
century has a distinctly therapeutic c o n t e x t in the public view. T h i s
association o f psychology with the medical profession is p r o b a b l y
inevitable. O u r materialistic social and intellectual paradigm w h i c h
emerged during the Industrial R e v o l u t i o n did n o t have m u c h place
for the psyche, and it w a s through treating physical symptoms o f
psychological origin that physicians first c a m e t o give any attention
to the psyche at all. T h u s , the t w o p r o m i n e n t pioneers in the field,
I'Veud and J u n g , were b o t h medical practitioners; and o u r society has
come t o be interested in psychological matters through a c c o u n t s o f
l heir psychotherapeutic activities. In fact, this blurring in the public
awareness o f the distinction between psychotherapy (which is a
medical c o n c e r n ) and psychology (which is a general knowledge o f
our mental processes) is an inconvenience for practitioners in b o t h
fields and it is c o m m o n t o find this distinction m a d e in the literature
on the subject. T h e C r a f t is in a s o m e w h a t different situation. It
derives f r o m a society w h o s e paradigm w a s n o t materialistic. It w a s
a paradigm w h i c h h a d a fundamentally psychological orientation, a
paradigm in w h i c h knowledge w a s based on a 'psychological reality'
rather than a 'physical reality'. Psychological development, as an
intellectual c o n c e p t , w a s as n o r m a l as physical development. T h e
psychological models o f the time, o f which the C r a f t offers an
example, were designed t o facilitate this n o r m a l psychological
growth . T h u s the first caution o f which w e must be a w a r e : w h e n we
consider the C r a f t as a psychology we must understand it t o be an
approach t o n o r m a l h u m a n development; we must n o t confuse it
with a m e a n s for treating psychological disorders.
T h e second notion o f w h i c h we must be careful is t o avoid the
temptation t o think o f the C r a f t as 'only a n o t h e r f o r m o f psychology'.
I r e e m a s o n r y and c o n t e m p o r a r y psychology have m u c h in c o m m o n
because they b o t h deal with the same area o f h u m a n experience, but
each approaches that area in its o w n way, and each has different
objectives. Psychology as a twentieth-century scientific discipline is
atheistic (in the strict sense o f the w o r d ) , and its objectives have t o do
with enabling people to live n o r m a l lives in a materialistic society.
Normal, in this sense, is a statistical c o n c e p t ; and has to do with
b e h a v i o u r w h i c h is c o m m o n t o m o s t p e o p l e in t h e society.
( i o n t e m p o r a r y psychology does n o t use ' n o r m a l ' in its other c o n t e x t ,
'behaviour in a c c o r d a n c e with design criteria', because it does n o t
recognise the existence o f a 'designer', n o r can it identify the 'design
criteria'. T o say that a n o t h e r way, psychology as a scientific discipline
does n o t acknowledge the c o n c e p t o f G o d or Divine purpose f o r
mankind. T h e C r a f t , in c o n t r a s t , is a psychology which acknowledges
the primacy o f G o d and envisions a psychological development in
which the individual fulfills his potential in order best t o serve the
Divine Will.
In the third p l a c e , w e should n o t be led t o believe t h a t , because
the C r a f t ' s p s y c h o l o g i c a l c o n c e p t s are expressed in t e r m s w h i c h are
q u a i n t by m o d e r n scientific s t a n d a r d s , they are o u t m o d e d o r n o
l o n g e r useful. T h e field o f p s y c h o l o g y h a s n o t a d v a n c e d as rapidly
in the last ninety years as its ' h a r d s c i e n c e ' c o u n t e r p a r t s ; a n d , in
g e n e r a l , p s y c h o l o g y has n o t lived up t o the p r o m i s e w h i c h it seemed
t o o f f e r w h e n it first a p p e a r e d a r o u n d the turn o f the twentieth
century. T h e r e is a real possibility t h a t c o n t e m p o r a r y scientific
t e c h n i q u e s m i g h t be better a d a p t e d t o p s y c h o l o g i c a l investigation
by the addition o f s o m e ' o l d - f a s h i o n e d ' c o n c e p t s a n d p r a c t i c e s .
( T h i s is actually h a p p e n i n g . S o m e psychologists a n d physicians are
turning their a t t e n t i o n t o research i n t o such areas as p a r a n o r m a l
p h e n o m e n a , near-death e x p e r i e n c e , a n d regression t o p r e b i r t h
e x p e r i e n c e . Such research is very difficult in the c o n t e x t o f the
scientific p a r a d i g m . T h e progress in this area will be slow, b u t
initial results p r o v i d e e v i d e n c e w h i c h c o n c u r s w i t h t h e o l d ,
'mystical' world view). O n the other hand, c o n t e m p o r a r y
p s y c h o l o g y h a s c o m p i l e d a vast a m o u n t o f o b s e r v a t i o n a l d a t a , a n d
a great deal o f serious t h o u g h t by dedicated a n d c o n s c i e n t i o u s
s c i e n t i s t s lies b e h i n d t h e c u r r e n t t h e o r i e s w h i c h h a v e b e e n
f o r m u l a t e d as a result o f the r e s e a r c h . It w o u l d be a r r o g a n t a n d
foolish simply t o dismiss this w o r k . T o the c o n t r a r y , if o u r view o f
the C r a f t as a p s y c h o l o g y be an a c c u r a t e o n e , w e should be able t o
e m b r a c e these findings (at least in a general w a y ) , a n d we m a y
e x p e c t t o find s u b s t a n t i a l areas o f c o r r e s p o n d e n c e b e t w e e n the
c o n t e m p o r a r y theories and our interpretation of the Craft's
s y m b o l i c structure. As w e will see, t h o s e c o r r e s p o n d e n c e s do e x i s t ,
a n d we will m a k e a g o o d deal o f use o f m o d e r n p s y c h o l o g i c a l
c o n c e p t s w h e r e they are a p p r o p r i a t e . B e c a u s e o f the different w o r l d
views outlined a b o v e , however, we will start with s o m e different
a s s u m p t i o n s a n d arrive at s o m e different c o n c l u s i o n s . W e should
n o t feel badly a b o u t these differences; c o n t e m p o r a r y p s y c h o l o g y is,
itself, by n o m e a n s a h o m o g e n e o u s body o f theory. In t h e
p a r a g r a p h s t h a t f o l l o w w e will i n t r o d u c e the m a j o r c o n c e p t s o f the
t w o m o s t influential c o n t e m p o r a r y psychologists, Freud and J u n g ,
and f o r o u r purposes w e will require only their m o s t basic ideas.
A l t h o u g h these t w o theories are quite different, we will use
c o n c e p t s f r o m b o t h . As we will see in the C o u r s e o f o u r
e x a m i n a t i o n o f M a s o n r y , the differences which so separated the
t w o m e n m a y very well derive from the fact that they were e a c h
studying a different p a r t o f the s a m e thing.
Freud
Freudian psychology w a s f o r m u l a t e d , as m u c h as possible, within
the c o n t e x t o f the scientific m e t h o d . A l t h o u g h d e b a t e s h a v e
continued t h r o u g h o u t the twentieth century a b o u t the validity o f
psychology's claim t o be a science, it is certainly true that Freud did
his best t o establish the discipline o n a scientific footing and that his
successors have continued those efforts. T h e r e has been, in recent
years, a proposal t o distinguish between Freud's clinical theories and
his philosophical w o r k on the origin and purpose o f the mind and t o
a b a n d o n the latter in favour o f the former. As a result o f these efforts
Freud's w o r k has been the Psychological theory m o s t acceptable t o
our materialistic twentieth-century society a n d , n o t surprisingly, the
least c o m p a r a b l e t o M a s o n r y .
In Freud's model the h u m a n psyche comprises three levels, w h i c h
he calls the id, the ego and the super-ego. T w o o f these levels, the id
and the super-ego, reside in a d o m a i n called 'the u n c o n s c i o u s ' , while
the third, the ego, comprises the conscious portion o f the m i n d . Freud
considers the id t o be the basic and m o s t real level o f the psyche. It is
in intimate c o n t a c t with the body, is the residence o f the instincts, and
is the source o f all o f the psyche's energy. T h e id operates o n the
pleasure principle. T h a t is, it acts t o seek pleasure through the release
of tension which the id perceives as pain. T h u s w h e n a bright light is
shined into a person's eyes he blinks, relieving the pain. T h i s reflex is
the sort o f action w h i c h is within the scope o f the id. W h i l e there are
a great m a n y tensions which c a n be resolved by such direct reflexes,
it is really a very primitive sort o f behaviour; and the id is described
as being infantile, a m o r a l and non-ethical.
W h i l e reflex is a satisfactory response t o m a n y situations, a far
greater n u m b e r o f t e n s i o n - p r o d u c i n g s i t u a t i o n s d e m a n d m o r e
sophisticated behaviour, if the tension is to be relieved. Hunger, for
example, produces tension w h i c h c a n n o t be relieved by reflex action.
A hungry person must identify, locate, acquire and eat f o o d before
the tension is relieved. M o r e o v e r he must acquire the f o o d in a w a y
which does n o t produce greater pain o r tension. T h e m a n a g e m e n t o f
this m o r e sophisticated behaviour is the task o f the ego, w h i c h
evolves out o f the id during childhood as the child learns t o cope with
increasingly c o m p l e x situations. T h e ego performs several tasks: it
builds, and stores in memory, images o f things in the physical w o r l d
which c a n be used to m e e t its needs; it postpones actions t o relieve
tension until the actions are appropriate (that is until they will n o t
produce a w o r s e situation); and it formulates plans to release tension
in an acceptable way. T o state these functions in terms o f the e x a m p l e
o f a hungry person, the ego r e m e m b e r s w h a t f o o d is, which things are
g o o d t o eat and w h i c h are p o i s o n o u s ; it does n o t steal f o o d (at least,
n o t in the presence o f a p o l i c e m a n ) ; and it arranges circumstances
(such as a purchase o r barter) t o acquire f o o d and eat it in p e a c e . All
o f these processes involve w h a t we call 'thinking'. In Freudian terms
the ego operates using the 'reality principle' t o relate the individual's
instinctual needs t o the constraints o f the physical w o r l d . T h u s the
ego thinks, plans, and tolerates tension until it c a n achieve pleasure
in a realistic manner. T h e ego is n o t (necessarily) primitive o r
infantile, but it is a m o r a l - seeking rewards and avoiding punishment.
T h e super-ego, w h i c h like the id is in that p o r t i o n o f the psyche o f
which the individual is u n c o n s c i o u s , is the agency which introduces
morality into the personality. Freud suggests that as the individual
develops through c h i l d h o o d he receives rewards (physical, such as
f o o d o r privilege, o r psychological, such as love o r approval) and
punishments (physical, such as deprivation, o r psychological, such as
disapproval) for his behaviour. T h e s e c h i l d h o o d experiences are
f o r g o t t e n in t i m e , b u t are s t o r e d in t h e u n c o n s c i o u s n e s s as
associations of reward with certain kinds of behaviour and
punishment with others. T h e y develop into the super-ego w h i c h has
t w o facets: conscience, w h i c h defines w r o n g and ego-ideal, which
defines right. T h r o u g h this process o f rewards and punishments,
administered by parents, teachers and others in authority, the child
learns h o w he is expected t o behave (not h o w his parents actually
behave but w h a t behaviour they think is right and w r o n g ) ; and by
reference t o his super-ego the individual can regulate his behaviour in
a c c o r d a n c e with his p a r e n t s ' , and later his society's, e x p e c t a t i o n s .
Ultimately, the function o f the super-ego is t o enable the individual t o
relate t o society.
Freud recognised in his later w o r k that there were t w o general
classes o f instincts w h i c h reside in the id and put energy into the
psyche; those which tend t o p r o m o t e life and those which tend t o
cause death. T h e f o r m e r group were termed (by Freud) as L i b i d o , and
the latter have been called (by his successors) M o r t i d o . T h e general
business o f Freudian Psychology (and psychotherapy) is the study o f
the interaction o f these constructive and destructive instinctual
energies as they are e x c h a n g e d between the various structural
elements o f the model described a b o v e . In particular, it is c o n c e r n e d
with the role o f the ego as the central feature, conscious essence, and
controlling agency o f the psyche. W e can see that Freud's psychology
is very m u c h orientated t o w a r d clinical evidence and environmental
determinism, and is quite devoid o f mystical o r even metaphysical
speculation.
Jung
Jung was several years younger than Freud and while his early career
was profoundly influenced by his predecessor, his m a t u r e w o r k was
quite different. H e felt m u c h less constrained t o produce w o r k which
was acceptable t o the conventional scientific community. Jung's
concepts include reference t o a wide variety o f classical, primitive,
and historical materials w h i c h might appear (at first) t o be quite
unrelated t o his clinical experience. F o r this reason J u n g has often
been accused o f being fuzzy, o f dabbling in metaphysics; and it is only
relatively recently that his w o r k has enjoyed a growing a c c e p t a n c e .
Like Freud, J u n g recognised the i m p o r t a n c e o f the unconscious
portion o f t h e p s y c h e . H e c o u l d n o t , h o w e v e r , a c c e p t t h e
overwhelming priority that his older colleague attached t o instinct
(and particularly the sex instinct) as the sole causal agency in the
development o f the psyche. Like Freud, J u n g regarded the analysis o f
dreams as one o f the m o s t valuable devices for examining the
unconscious, but his dream analysis led him t o a very different model
of the psyche. According t o Jung's c o n c e p t the individual's psyche is
whole t o begin with. Psychological development is a process o f
bringing the c o m p o n e n t s o f the psyche into consciousness and
synthesising them. Jung's view o f the psyche consists o f three levels,
the individual consciousness, the personal unconscious and the
collective unconscious.
T h e r e are four functions potentially available t o the individual
consciousness - thinking, feeling, sensation, a n d intuition. T h e first
two are rational in the sense t h a t they involve ordering things;
thinking orders t h e m by analysis, feeling orders them by value. T h e
second t w o are said t o be irrational functions in that they do n o t
involve judgment o r reasoning; sensation involves perception o f
reality (internal o r e x t e r n a l ) , intuition is perception o f the potential
inherent in an event, sometimes f r o m the unconscious as with a
1
hunch' o r 'just k n o w i n g ' . T h e individual m a y also have t w o
attitudes: extroversion, which is an orientation t o w a r d s events
outside one's self, and introversion, which is a c o n c e r n with one's
interior life. T h e ego is the conscious part o f the psyche and in this
respect is the supervisor o f day-to-day psychological activity. It has,
a m o n g others, the task o f selecting the p h e n o m e n a (thought, memory,
perception o r feeling) w h i c h will be permitted into consciousness.
The criteria for selection and rejection depend upon w h i c h function
and attitude is d o m i n a n t and upon the extent t o w h i c h the person is
self-possessed. T h i s selectivity o f the ego is an essential defence for the
psyche w h i c h would otherwise be overwhelmed by input o f one sort
o r another. T h e ego has the task o f relating the individual t o his
physical a n d social environment. O n e o f the principal adaptive
devices used by the ego is the persona (from the G r e e k w o r d for
m a s k ) , w h i c h is the facade w h i c h the ego presents t o the w o r l d . F a r
f r o m being hypocritical, the persona permits one t o fit into the
demands o f social situations while maintaining one's individuality. A
person m a y use several personae, one at h o m e , a n o t h e r at w o r k , a
third for his time at the p u b . E a c h permits him t o relate differently to
different situations. In managing these personae the ego provides for
a continuity o f consciousness so that one k n o w s one's self t o be the
s a m e p e r s o n w h i l e e x h i b i t i n g d i f f e r e n t p e r s o n a e in d i f f e r e n t
situations.
T h e personal unconscious c o n t a i n s material which has been
conscious at some time, and has since been forgotten o r repressed,
together with impressions o f experiences which the ego did n o t , o r
c o u l d n o t , a l l o w i n t o c o n s c i o u s n e s s . It c o n t a i n s a s o r t o f
comprehensive record o f the individual's experience. M a t e r i a l c a n
generally be recalled f r o m the personal unconscious as, f o r e x a m p l e ,
w h e n one remembers a telephone n u m b e r o f which one is conscious
only w h e n it is being used. T h e personal unconscious also c o n t a i n s
w h a t J u n g called ' c o m p l e x e s ' . A c o m p l e x is a cluster o f attitudes,
feelings and behaviour patterns w h i c h have b e c o m e associated
around a c o m m o n element which m a y be any event o r o b j e c t in the
individual's history. People are usually unaware o f their c o m p l e x e s ,
although they generally have p r o f o u n d effect on the person's
behaviour. T h e effect m a y be detrimental, such as a c o m p l e x w h i c h
regards m o n e y as evil and causes the individual t o reject it, live in
poverty, and c o n d e m n all c o m m e r c i a l activity; or advantageous as in
the case o f an inventor w h o is driven to pursue his practice with
single-mindedness and finally produces a device which m a k e s a great
advance in the well being o f society. In the exploration o f the personal
unconscious one encounters the ' S e l f . J u n g uses the term t o describe
a p r i n c i p l e w h i c h pulls t o g e t h e r a n d i n t e g r a t e s the several
c o m p o n e n t s o f the psyche. It usually remains beyond the threshold o f
consciousness only t o emerge, if at all, in middle or later life, after the
other elements o f the psyche have b e c o m e reasonably well identified
and disciplined.
T h e collective unconscious is a part o f the psyche which does n o t
depend upon individual experience. It is shared by all m e m b e r s o f the
human race and contains material, o f which the individual m a y never
have been c o n s c i o u s . T h e collective unconscious consists o f prototype
images; that is, o f images w h i c h provide the basis upon w h i c h similar
psychological experiences will be built. T h e s e primordial images,
which J u n g called archetypes, consist only o f ' f o r m w i t h o u t c o n t e n t ,
representative merely o f the possibility o f a certain perception and
action'. An e x a m p l e will help clarify this point. T h e r e is an archetype
in the collective unconscious o f the H e r o . It c o n t a i n s the essence o f
heroism and each individual h u m a n being has access t o the hero
archetype. T h e particular image w h i c h any one individual will have
of a hero will depend upon his experience with heroic individuals in
his o w n life. T h e r e are a vast n u m b e r o f archetypes: concepts such as
birth, death, m o t h e r and father; objects such as rivers, stones,
animals; artifacts such as candles, swords, rings a n d b o x e s m a y all be
archetypes. In fact, J u n g conceived that there is an archetype for each
basic h u m a n s i t u a t i o n . In studying the a r c h e t y p e s w h i c h he
encountered in the course o f his professional practice J u n g drew on
material f r o m a n t h r o p o l o g y as well as f r o m Classical, medieval and
Renaissance literature. H e spent substantial time investigating the
symbolic structure o f alchemy, and w a s p r o b a b l y the first m o d e r n
investigator t o recognise t h a t m u c h medieval and R e n a i s s a n c e
thought, w h i c h o u r society usually calls superstition, is actually a
description o f psychological processes expressed in an unfamiliar
symbolic f o r m .
Some archetypes are o f such basic i m p o r t a n c e as t o have a central
role in Jung's theories. S o m e we have already n o t e d : the persona,
which we have seen is the c o n f o r m i n g archetype; and the Self, the
archetype o f integration and c o - o r d i n a t i o n . O t h e r s include the
animus, the a n i m a , and the shadow.
All theories o f the psyche treat the subject o f sexuality and J u n g
approaches it through the archetypes o f the animus and a n i m a . E a c h
human psyche is, in Jung's view, complete; and like the body which
contains the chemistry o f b o t h sexes, the psyche c o n t a i n s the essential
psychological qualities o f b o t h sexes, male and female, animus and
anima respectively. In m e n the animus is identified with the ego, while
the a n i m a is c o n c e a l e d ; the reverse is true with w o m e n . T h e nature o f
a man's a n i m a and his relationship t o it will determine the nature o f
his relationship with the w o m e n he meets in the w o r l d , and the
reverse situation is true f o r w o m e n .
T h e s h a d o w is the archetype which c o n t a i n s a great deal o f
instinctual material, as well as aspects o f the individual's o w n psyche
which he w o u l d prefer n o t t o acknowledge. T h e process o f fitting in
t o society causes m a n y people t o put their powerful instincts and
strong e m o t i o n s out o f their consciousness and suppress them by
exercising a strong p e r s o n a . T h i s suppressed material w h i c h one
c h o o s e s n o t t o acknowledge a b o u t one's self resides in the s h a d o w
where it is always ready t o break out into manifestation. Frequently
people p r o j e c t the contents o f their o w n s h a d o w on others, assigning
t o them the faults which they c a n n o t acknowledge in themselves.
J u n g i a n psychologists describe the psychological processes in terms
o f the e x c h a n g e o f energy between the elements in the structure
outlined a b o v e . T h e s e elements m a y c o m p e n s a t e f o r one another,
oppose o n e another o r unite t o f o r m a synthesis. Like their Freudian
colleagues, the J u n g i a n s envision a development within the psyche;
but the objectives are quite different. Freud envisions a strengthening
o f the ego so that it c a n cope with the situations presented by life.
J u n g envisions a differentiation o f the m a n y archetypes w h i c h m a k e
up the psyche by their being admitted by the ego into consciousness
where they are integrated into the w h o l e by the co-ordinating
function o f the Self.
T h i s overview o f the t w o m o s t p r o m i n e n t psychological schools
hardly scratches the surface o f each. Indeed, it touches only upon the
m o s t basic concepts o f the founders o f these t w o s c h o o l s , and ignores
the development w h i c h has occurred in b o t h theories. O u r purpose
here, however, is n o t to c o m p a r e the C r a f t with c o n t e m p o r a r y
psychology. T h e review a b o v e is intended only t o provide us with a
definition o f the basic concepts t o use when we discuss the symbols
o f the C r a f t . It a l s o i n d i c a t e s t h a t F r e u d ' s w o r k , a l t h o u g h
a c k n o w l e d g i n g t h e i m p o r t a n c e o f the u n c o n s c i o u s , t e n d s t o
c o n c e n t r a t e on the m o r e concrete area o f conscious processes; while
J u n g was prepared t o forego approval o f the scientific c o m m u n i t y t o
develop m o r e completely his theories o f the unconscious and its
structure. Because o f this difference we will find that Jung's w o r k is
m o r e generally parallel t o the Craft's symbolism than that o f Freud;
but, as we have said, we will use concepts f r o m both as we m o v e , at
last, f r o m our survey o f b a c k g r o u n d material t o our e x a m i n a t i o n o f
the Craft itself.
CHAPTER 2
The Craft
W o r l d of:
Spirit
Air
Creation
W o r l d of:
Psyche
Water
Formation
W o r l d of:
Physicality
Earth
Making
Figure 4
r e m e m b e r also that n o officer is m o r e i m p o r t a n t than a n o t h e r ; each
stage o f consciousness must be functioning and in the correct
relationship t o the others, if the incarnate individual is t o realise his
potential.
T h e first, and m o s t junior, o f the officers is the O u t e r G u a r d or
Tyler. H e stands outside the Lodge where he represents that part of
the psyche which is in direct c o n t a c t with the body through the
central nervous system and with the physical w o r l d through the sense
o r g a n s . In everyday living we have very little awareness o f this body
consciousness. Unless the body itself malfunctions through disease,
accident o r deprivation; o r unless we direct o u r attention t o it
specifically, it operates pretty m u c h o n its o w n . W h i l e a few o f its
functions, such as breathing, c a n be controlled consciously within
certain limits, the m o r e c o m p l e x o f the essential functions, such as
digestion and heartbeat, are usually quite inaccessible a n d are
regulated automatically. Although the physical b o d y is c a p a b l e of
m o r e o r less independent operation, it does have real and legitimate
d e m a n d s such as hunger, t h i r s t , s e x u a l drives, a p p r o p r i a t e
environment, etc. and these demands together with i n f o r m a t i o n
a b o u t the physical w o r l d are c o m m u n i c a t e d by the b o d y t o the
psyche through the level o f consciousness represented by the Tyler.
W e c a n see that the physical body provides a substantial input of
energy t o the psyche in the f o r m o f physical demands and sensory
i n f o r m a t i o n , and the Tyler represents that psychological function
which first receives this energy and directs it properly. S o m e o f this
energy is passed t o the m o r e senior officers - higher conscious states
o f the psyche - as sensory data a b o u t the environment and the body
itself. A significant part o f the incoming energy is passed directly into
the unconscious parts o f the psyche w i t h o u t the individual being
aware o f it. S o m e o f this i n f o r m a t i o n is used by the a u t o n o m i c
nervous system in its task o f regulating the body's functioning. T h e
rest passes into the personal unconscious. H e r e we see t w o points
which need our attention. First, we c a n see the Tyler in his role as a
guardian, because he protects the consciousness f r o m being swamped
by an overload o f sensory input f r o m the physical w o r l d . S e c o n d , we
c a n see w h y the Tyler must be under conscious c o n t r o l . M a n y people
misuse the Tyler's ability t o bypass i n f o r m a t i o n t o the unconscious to
enable them t o ignore unpleasant things they do n o t wish t o
acknowledge. T h e p h e n o m e n o n o f being u n a w a r e o f significant
events w h i c h o c c u r in one's presence is n o t an u n c o m m o n o n e .
As we have seen, Freud recognised that the psyche receives a large
input f r o m the body. H e referred t o that part o f the unconscious in
which this energy originates as the id (although he did n o t associate
l he id specifically with the body) and he s a w this energy as being
associated with constructive and destructive instincts. Freudian
psychologists refer t o this positive and negative instinctual energy as
l i b i d o and M o r t i d o respectively. W e will see h o w the Craft's
HV in holism deals with this c o n c e p t o f active and passive energy in due
i ourse. F o r the m o m e n t we should recognise that the psyche receives
i substantial a m o u n t o f positive and negative energy f r o m the body
.ind its instincts. It will be useful t o think o f this area f r o m which the
hotly's energy enters the psyche as the sub-conscious a n d t o reserve
I he term unconscious for the higher stages o f awareness within the
temple. T h e Tyler, as the lowest and m o s t outwardly orientated o f
I he Officers, represents that very i m p o r t a n t faculty w h i c h relates the
psyche to its physical vehicle and through it to the physical w o r l d .
The second officer in r a n k a n d stage o f awareness is the Inner
(tiiard. His position within the d o o r indicates that this stage o f
consciousness is genuinely within the psyche, while his intimate
relationship with the O u t e r G u a r d indicates that he is very m u c h
concerned with the physical w o r l d . In the terminology o f m o d e r n
psychology, the Inner G u a r d represents the ordinary consciousness;
l he ego. ( T h e w o r d ego is used here in the general c o n t e x t assigned by
c o n t e m p o r a r y psychologists w h o s e m o d e l s w e are using as a
h a m e w o r k t o study the C r a f t and w h o s e terminology is in general
use. Some nineteenth and early twentieth century writers have used
the term E g o (capitalised) t o represent the interior essence o f the
individual, a c o n c e p t which we will identify in this b o o k by the
lungian term, Self). N o w , m o s t people give primary attention t o the
physical w o r l d ; and in a person so orientated, the ego is directed
outward t o w a r d s the body a n d its physical activities. T h e Freudian
school o f psychology, w h o s e theories were formulated on the basis o f
observation o f people with this orientation, considers the ego t o be
I he executive agency o f the individual. H e r e we see one o f the
principal differences between the Craft's c o n c e p t o f the h u m a n being
and that o f the Freudian psychologist. If we were t o attempt t o
express the Freudian model in M a s o n i c symbolism, the Inner G u a r d
I he ego - stands in the d o o r w a y o f the Lodge peering over the Tyler's
shoulder, so t o speak, and trying as best he can t o direct the activity
of the body; all the while he is oblivious o f the activities o f the Lodge
which o c c u r behind him in his unconscious. T h i s is an unfortunate
situation, because the ego, while a g o o d servant, and routine
operator, does n o t have the capacity o r scope o f understanding t o be
A good master. Indeed, it frequently leads the individual into trouble.
T h i s is, o f c o u r s e , the situation in which m a n y people find themselves;
a n d it a c c o u n t s for m u c h h u m a n grief - but it falls far short o f h u m a n
potential.
T h e open lodge is a model o f the psyche w h e n it is a w a k e to its
p o t e n t i a l . In the M a s o n i c m o d e l we see that the Inner G u a r d l o o k s in
t w o directions - i n w a r d , t o the junior W a r d e n , t o receive instruction
f r o m deep within the psyche and o u t w a r d , t o the Tyler, t o receive
perceptions f r o m the body. H e r e w e see the ego operating as it
should, as a level o f consciousness w h i c h mediates between the
psyche and the physical w o r l d . In this capacity as an intermediary, the
Inner G u a r d , o r e g o , presents itself in various ways t o the world at
large. T h e s e personae c h a n g e as the individual finds himself in
different situations a n d this conveys part o f the meaning o f the Inner
Guard's protective role, because the ego usually presents the socially
a c c e p t a b l e persona and the w o r l d sees only that aspect o f the psyche
w h i c h the Inner Guard/ego presents at the door. Like m o s t sentinels,
the Inner G u a r d functions very nicely in routine situations; and the
ego w h i c h he represents is properly charged with the supervision o f
the minute-to-minute routine activities o f thinking, doing and feeling
in the everyday physical experience. In cases o f emergency, however,
a n d in the O p e n L o d g e , w h i c h is c o n c e r n e d with serious w o r k at the
psychological level, the ego is seen in his proper perspective: as an
excellent doorkeeper.
T h e D e a c o n s are messengers (the title derives f r o m the G r e e k 'dai-
k o n o s ' - he w h o h a s b e e n p u s h e d t h r o u g h ) . As s t a t e s o f
consciousness, these stages exist, for m o s t people, at or just beyond
the threshold o f ordinary awareness and they carry 'messages' o r
reflect the situation from the deeper levels o f the psyche (the Principal
Officers) to the ego (the Inner G u a r d ) . A l m o s t everyone is a w a r e , at
s o m e time o r another, o f the states o f consciousness represented by
the D e a c o n s w h i c h , in c o n t e m p o r a r y terms, we might call a feeling o r
intuition and a w a k e n i n g .
T h e junior D e a c o n represents the stage o f feeling, intuition o r
sensitivity which a l m o s t everyone recognises f r o m time t o t i m e ,
although s o m e people are far m o r e a w a r e o f their intuition t h a n
others. Intuition is n o t directly c o n n e c t e d with the physical w o r l d ,
although, o f c o u r s e , it c a n be related t o physical things. Intuition is a
sort o f direct knowledge which is presented to the Inner G u a r d (ego)
f r o m the Principal Officers deep in the u n c o n s c i o u s , together with the
reciprocal (and a u t o m a t i c ) function o f passing external i n f o r m a t i o n
b a c k to the Principal O f f i c e r s . O n e o f the m o s t c o m m o n experiences
o f the J u n i o r D e a c o n ' s message is the pang o f c o n s c i e n c e . O f t e n we
hear a person say, i k n o w I have done the wrong thing', even in the
absence o f external evidence. T h i s sort of message originates quite deep
in the psyche (with the Senior Warden, as we shall see) and it is brought
to the Inner Guard's (ego's) attention by the J u n i o r D e a c o n as the
intuitive knowledge of the error (or Tightness) o f one's action. Another
frequently recognised e x a m p l e o f the J u n i o r D e a c o n ' s stage of
awareness is the foreboding which warns o f a dangerous or unpleasant
situation. In films this state is indicated by dark lighting and sinister
music, but in real life perceptive people can sense directly the hostility
which may be present in an ostensibly congenial surrounding. T h e
intuitions o f the J u n i o r D e a c o n may be responses to external events, or
indications o f activities in the unconscious; but they, themselves, are
relatively superficial in the same way that the message is usually
unimportant compared t o the event t o which it refers.
T h e Senior D e a c o n c o r r e s p o n d s t o the stage o f a w a k e n i n g . It is a
stage o f awareness w h i c h is n o t particularly c o m m o n in ordinary
experience, and to attain it confers substantial advantage. T o be
a w a k e is to be present in the m o m e n t . G o o d athletes experience this
sort o f awareness immediately prior t o a contest. S o , also, do lovers
w h e n they recognise their relationship and discover their mutual
w o r l d for the first time. S o , t o o , does the driver o f an a u t o m o b i l e
frequently ' a w a k e n ' w h e n his c a r starts to skid into danger on a slick
patch o f r o a d . T h e s e are situations in which the individuals have been
thrust into the a w a k e n i n g stage by external events. A n y o n e w h o
c o m m u t e s in a m a j o r city c a n identify easily the stage o f a w a k e n i n g .
F o r e x a m p l e , w h e n riding the L o n d o n U n d e r g r o u n d , o n e can
' a w a k e n ' a n d realise s u d d e n l y t h a t o n e has been f o l l o w i n g
automatically a familiar, although quite c o m p l e x , route through
several tube stations, catching the proper trains w i t h o u t conscious
attention and w i t h o u t the ability t o recall doing s o . T h i s habitual
behaviour is being asleep, and a large p r o p o r t i o n o f people live m o s t
o f their lives in this fashion and c o m p l a i n vociferously when asked to
break the pattern. C o n t r a s t this habitual behaviour with the state o f
mind adopted by the infrequent visitor t o L o n d o n w h o must travel on
the Underground changing at t w o c o m p l e x stations to arrive at a
tightly scheduled a p p o i n t m e n t . Such a person is a w a k e voluntarily.
T h i s state o f a w a k e n i n g is characterised by sharpness o f image, by an
objectivity, by a clarity o f perception and by a general alertness to
events ( b o t h internal a n d e x t e r n a l ) and t o their i m p l i c a t i o n s .
Everyone has a few m o m e n t s o f being a w a k e in this sense, and those
experiences are generally available as vivid memories because the
individual w a s alert and acutely a w a r e at the time.
A relatively small p r o p o r t i o n o f people are ' a w a k e ' m o s t o f the
time although their attention is often directed principally outward,
t o w a r d the w o r l d , rather than inward t o w a r d their o w n natures. Such
people are alert t o the circumstances around t h e m , and because they
are a w a k e , they see and seize opportunities o f which others are
entirely u n a w a r e . T h u s , they rise t o prominence as the leaders in
politics, business, trade unions and a c a d e m e . T h e y are perceived
(correctly) as being people o f great ability and they m a n a g e the affairs
o f the w o r l d , for g o o d o r f o r ill, according t o the disposition o f the
other c o m p o n e n t s o f their psyches. W h e n a person c o m m i t s himself
t o s o m e sort o f p r o g r a m m e o f self-knowledge, such as the W o r k of
the C r a f t , the experience o f being a w a k e , o f being in the place o f the
Senior D e a c o n , b e c o m e s less u n c o m m o n . In time it b e c o m e s a m o r e
and m o r e familiar state o f mind as one tries t o adopt it regularly. T h e
thing which sets the C r a f t s m a n apart is that as well as being a w a k e
t o his external circumstances, he also seeks t o be a w a k e t o his
motives, t o the long-term effects o f his actions o n himself a n d others,
t o the personal interior g r o w t h he should be trying t o achieve, a n d ,
n o t least, t o w h a t he c a n grasp o f the intention o f Divinity f o r him
(his purpose in the w o r l d ) . Providence frequently offers a m o m e n t o f
a w a k e n i n g by w a y o f e n c o u r a g e m e n t t o a person newly started in
interior w o r k , and it is usually an ecstatic experience as one sees the
symbolic structure o f his chosen discipline c o m e t o life with great
clarity. T h e ecstasy usually fades, however; the h o n e y m o o n period
ends, and the hard w o r k , symbolised by M a s o n i c Labour, begins.
Gradually one w h o c o m m i t s himself t o that l a b o u r finds that he
becomes a w a k e m o r e and m o r e frequently. In this state, the person
w o r k i n g on himself is a w a r e , n o t simply o f the situation in the w o r l d
a b o u t him, but o f the situation within himself.
T h e f o u r Officers w h i c h we have considered thus far are the
Assistant Officers, those w h o s e places and duties are o n the floor o f
the L o d g e , the G r o u n d F l o o r o f the Temple. In other w o r d s the
Assistant Officers all represent levels o f consciousness w h i c h are
concerned in some w a y with the relationship between the psyche a n d
the body. T h i s situation is reflected in Figure 5 . W e have seen this
diagram before, but n o w the positions o f the Officers are indicated.
T h e Assistant Officers are all t o be found on the G r o u n d Floor, t h e
area o f the psychological world w h i c h interpenetrates the physical
w o r l d . T h e situation o f the Principal Officers is quite different. T h e i r
places are above the floor, and their positions are fixed. In o u r
consideration o f these three Officers, w h o together 'govern t h e
L o d g e ' , it is particularly i m p o r t a n t t o recognise the limitations w h i c h
Figure 5
are imposed by the nature o f ritual. W h i l e the three officers are, of
necessity, represented symbolically by three separate people, we must
r e m e m b e r t h a t the levels o f consciousness they represent are n o t
really separate things; they are, rather, three enduring aspects o f the
individual himself.
T h e least o f these Principal Officers is the J u n i o r W a r d e n . H e is
associated with the First Degree, the custodian o f the Apprentice's
t o o l s , and the director o f activity on the G r o u n d F l o o r o f the Temple.
W h e n this symbolism is applied t o the individual, we see the junior
W a r d e n as representing that stage o f consciousness which directs - o r
should direct - the activities o f the individual in the physical w o r l d .
H e r e is one o f the i m p o r t a n t differences between eastern and western
traditions. M a n y people w h o are w o r k i n g t o develop their interior
capacities tend t o minimise the i m p o r t a n c e o f ordinary m u n d a n e
activities; this is an essentially eastern view. T h e western m i n d ,
however, tends to be by nature relatively inquiring and analytical and
often requires a w a y o f w o r k i n g which matches that quality. T h e
C r a f t is such a w a y ; it acknowledges t h a t there is a Divine Plan and
that each individual's life has s o m e role in it. F r o m that perspective
the circumstance o f one's incarnation has some real i m p o r t a n c e , and
the m a n a g e m e n t o f one's life in the w o r l d is seen as an essential part
o f one's interior g r o w t h in w h i c h the J u n i o r Warden plays a central
role.
T h e J u n i o r Warden stands in an i m p o r t a n t position. In the diagram
o f the four worlds we have seen each w o r l d as a successively grosser
reflection o f the world a b o v e it. T h e J u n i o r Warden's situation is at
the place where the three lower worlds meet, and it is this unique
location that gives the individual w h o operates f r o m t h a t level o f
consciousness his particular quality. Being at the a p e x o f the Physical
W o r l d , he is the directing agency o f the G r o u n d Floor, the epitome o f
the physical nature o f m a n , the master o f his material situation. At
the same time he is at the centre o f his psychological being where he
is the 'reflection o f the reflection' o f the C r e a t o r at the centre o f
Divinity; thus, he is reminded that he is 'made in the image o f G o d ' .
Being in the south he is associated with the sun at n o o n , that is t o say,
with the bright unclouded consciousness which sees with clarity, and
is a w a r e o f his psychological state and the effect it has on people and
things around him. His position also touches the b o t t o m o f the world
o f the Spirit which gives him a glimpse o f his destiny. T h i s is a stage
o f c o n s c i o u s n e s s n o t universally r e c o g n i s e d by c o n t e m p o r a r y
psychology. Freud did n o t incorporate the c o n c e p t into his theory;
but something similar is found in Jung's model as the archetype he
calls the Self, the essence o f the individual. T h e l o c a t i o n at the
I unction o f the three l o w e r w o r l d s is w h a t gives the J u n i o r
Warden/Self its scope a n d its capacity t o integrate the other elements
of the p s y c h e . W h e n a p e r s o n o p e r a t e s f r o m this stage o f
consciousness he sees his psychological processes and understands his
motives clearly. H e negotiates with the physical w o r l d through his
ego which assumes its appropriate role as an intermediary. (This
c o m m a n d relationship between J u n i o r W a r d e n and Inner G u a r d is
touched on in the C e r e m o n y o f O p e n i n g the Lodge and we will
examine it in a little detail w h e n w e speak o f L a b o u r in the First
Degree.) At the same time, he c a n be open t o the influence o f the
Spirit which enlivens him f r o m a b o v e .
T h e J u n i o r Warden is the first glimpse we have o f the psyche itself,
of that part o f the h u m a n being which existed before birth and will
survive after the body dies. T h e Senior W a r d e n presides over the
Middle C h a m b e r , w h i c h associates him with the S e c o n d Degree. H e
represents a stage o f consciousness yet m o r e p r o f o u n d than that o f his
junior colleague; the Senior W a r d e n symbolises the consciousness o f
the Soul. Even a cursory review o f the Fellowcraft's W o r k i n g T o o l s
and the Perfect Ashlar o f w h i c h the Senior Warden is the custodian
indicate that the activities which o c c u r in the Soul o r M i d d l e
(!hamber have t o do with morality, with trying a n d testing and with
proving against absolute criteria. Consciousness at the stage o f the
Senior W a r d e n (the Soul) is consciousness o f m o r a l i t y ; and with this
stage o f awareness one prescribes the rules by w h i c h the J u n i o r
Warden (the Self) c o n d u c t s his business. T h e Senior W a r d e n (Soul)
does n o t , usually, have m u c h difficulty c o m m u n i c a t i n g with the
Junior W a r d e n (Self); but in the c o m m o n situation o f an individual
working f r o m his ego, his limited consciousness is u n a w a r e o f the
general functioning o f his psyche. In such a case the Senior W a r d e n
frequently finds it hard t o get his message through t o consciousness.
In this situation the Senior Warden's messenger - the J u n i o r D e a c o n
(intuition) - m a k e s his w a y t o the Inner G u a r d (ego) and the
individual b e c o m e s a w a r e o f his Soul's activity as a pang o f
conscience. In the diagram o f the F o u r Worlds (Figure 5 ) the Senior
Warden/Soul is s h o w n occupying the small zone entirely with the
psyche, a n d it is this position that gives the Soul its particular quality.
As we have seen, the G r o u n d F l o o r is in c o n t a c t with the physical
world and the J u n i o r W a r d e n is constrained n o t only by the laws
which operate in the psyche, but also by the physical laws as he
c o n d u c t s his a c t i v i t i e s . T h e W o r s h i p f u l M a s t e r is s i m i l a r l y
constrained by the laws operating in the spiritual w o r l d with w h i c h
he is intimately associated. But the Senior W a r d e n , the Soul, exists
entirely within the psyche and is subject only t o the laws o f the
psychological w o r l d . It is in this relative freedom that free will is
possible t o the h u m a n being, and it is the reason morality is the
central issue in the Second Degree.
T h e Worshipful M a s t e r serves at the P o r c h w a y entrance t o the
H o l y o f Holies. T h i s area o f the psyche, as the diagram o f the F o u r
W o r l d s (Figure 5 ) s h o w s , is intimately related t o the spiritual world
in the same w a y that the G r o u n d F l o o r is related t o the physical
world - at the t o p it touches the very lowest part o f Divinity. As the
J u n i o r Warden is the M a n a g e r w h o integrates the psyche and
oversees the w o r k a n d the Senior Warden is the Controller w h o sets
the standards, so the Worshipful M a s t e r is the D i r e c t o r w h o
establishes the objectives and defines the policies. H e is qualified t o
do so because, at this level o f consciousness one sees past one's
personal considerations t o perceive the needs and aspirations o f one's
tribe, one's nation o r perhaps o f the race, as a w h o l e . It is a difficult
state o f consciousness t o c o m p r e h e n d , relating as it does t o the T h i r d
Degree, ' t o a complete understanding (of which) few attain'. W e will
e x a m i n e the Worshipful M a s t e r in a little greater detail w h e n we
consider the M a s t e r M a s o n ' s Degree. F o r the m o m e n t we should
recognise t h a t f r o m this position one c a n ' t o u c h the hem o f the R o b e ' ;
and one c a n c o m e , if it be the Divine W i l l , into the presence o f the
M o s t High.
H e r e then, is the Craft's model o f the h u m a n psyche, a three-storey
temple f o r indwelling Divinity in which seven Officers serve. T h e
latter represent seven stages o f consciousness w h i c h range f r o m
awareness o f physicality a t the b o t t o m , to c o n t a c t with Divinity at the
t o p . T h e psyche is by n o m e a n s a static environment. It is, rather, an
area o f intense activity. W e will complete our preliminary overview o f
the Craft's m o d e l by considering the laws w h i c h govern this
psychological activity.
Notice that the officers whose task it is to relate the individual to the
physical world are not active in a Fellowcraft Lodge (or, more
precisely, they are active, but do not obtrude into consciousness at
this level). It is to this interior work, to the discovery of 'hidden
pathways of Nature and Science', that the candidate is introduced at
the Ceremony of Passing.
We have noted the simplicity of the Second Degree ritual which has
often caused it to he neglected or at least regarded as of secondary
importance in the Craft's system. This misleading simplicity is
reflected in the Charge to the Fellowcraft which, like the obligation,
is almost disappointing in its brevity. Beyond recommending
continued attention to the elaborate advice given him as an
Apprentice, the Charge in the Second Degree simply 'observes' that
the candidate is 'now permitted to extend his researches into the more
hidden mysteries of Nature and Science.' The ceremony does not even
comment on what those mysteries might be. If the ritual in the Second
Degree is simple, we must assume that it was structured in that
fashion for some purpose; because the principal material of the
Degree (which is both rich, and broad in scope) is contained not in
the ritual, but in the Lecture. This is entirely appropriate because
Work in the Middle Chamber, one's Soul, is essentially interior work
and must, necessarily, tend to emphasise the approach of
contemplation over that of ritual. With this in mind, we will consider
the Lecture for some clue to the nature of the hidden mysteries into
which the new Fellowcraft may now research.
Of the five sections of the Second Lecture, one recapitulates the
ceremony and three discuss the symbolism of the Tracing Board. The
remaining (second) section introduces three apparently unconnected
subjects: Geometry, Travel and Creation. We will look at the Tracing
Board in the next chapter; here we will confine our attention to the
second section of the Lecture. As we do that it will be useful to keep
two things in mind. First, although the Masonic Lectures are said to
be explanatory, that is hardly the case. It is more accurate to say that
they introduce material for study, and they often do that by the
merest hint. Second, the material in the Lectures was originally
addressed to Englishmen living in the eighteenth and early nineteenth
centuries, and if it is to be interpreted properly, it must be seen in the
context of that period. This puts a double burden on the twentieth-
century Mason. He must understand what the Craft's symbols meant
to their intended recipients before he can apply them to himself.
The three topics which require our attention in the second section
of the Lecture are Geometry, Creation and Travel. At first glance they
appear to be quite separate subjects, which gives the Lecture a
discontinuous quality. As we examine them here, however, it will
become clear that they are but three important aspects of a single
subject, western metaphysical cosmology, to which the new
Fellowcraft is to be introduced. We touched on this subject when we
introduced the doctrine of the four worlds and we will not repeat all
that material here; but it will be useful to see how the Craft
introduces other related concepts which we have been using.
The candidate is said to have been passed to the Second Degree 'for
the sake of Geometry' which is defined as 'a science whereby we find
out the contents of bodies unmeasured by comparing them with those
already measured'. The subjects are said to include 'a regular
progression of science from a point to a line, from a line to a
superficies, and from a superficies to a solid.' This is certainly an
incomplete, perhaps even, inaccurate, definition of Geometry. Even
considering the language of the seventeenth century, mathematical
concepts were defined with greater precision than the lecture exhibits
.uid this incompleteness should lead us to look further for a different
meaning which is accurately stated. The first quotation, while
incomplete in the mathematical sense, is a very nice statement of the
old principle of interior work, 'If you want to understand the
invisible, observe the visible.' This principle, which we have been
using throughout the book, is based on the Law of Unity, and it
suggests that there is a single set of laws operating throughout the
lour worlds which comprise the relative universe. When we see them
operate to produce observable results in the physical (visible) world
we can be sure that the same laws are operating in an analogous way
in the psychological and spiritual worlds because the laws themselves
lake their origin in the Divine World. As we have observed before, the
most succinct statement of this principle is 'As above, so below'.
We have seen that the second quotation is a direct reference to the
doctrine of the Four Worlds which we developed in Chapter 1,
Section 3. It was the symbolic idiom used by Proculus, the last of the
classical neoplatonic philosophers, and we may assume that the
eighteenth-century Mason with his education in the classics would
have come across it in his readings and would recognise the context.
Should the new Fellowcraft not be familiar with neoplatonic
literature, the Lecture pointed him in that direction by informing him
that 'Geometry was founded as a science' in Alexandria by Euclid.
Actually, Geometry was practised in Greece by Pythagoras who was
about two hundred years Euclid's senior. The questionable accuracy
might be rationalised by arguing the meaning of 'founded as a
science', but it is more fruitful to ask why the framers of the Lecture
chose to emphasise Euclid and Alexandria. The passage is almost
certainly a pointer, because the enquiring Craftsman who turned his
attention to Alexandria would surely have found Plotinus, the
Alexandrian Greek who was the founder of neoplatonism. Similarly,
if he turned to Euclid in the eighteenth century he would find John
Dee's famous introduction to the English translation; and that, as we
have seen, guides him directly into the Hermetic/Kabbalistic
tradition, part of the main-stream of Renaissance thought.
Once we have seen the subject of Geometry and the geometric
progression as a device for introducing the doctrine of the Four
Worlds, its relationship to the Creation story becomes clear. In fact,
each is drawn from substantially the same source. The Lecture's
illustration of the seven periods of Creation is a summary of the first
two chapters of Genesis - the first of the five books of Moses. The
Geometric progression as a representation of the Four Worlds is
taken from Proculus whose work was subsequently incorporated into
the Spanish Kabbalistic work of Isaac ibn Latif which covers the same
material and includes part of the old Jewish oral tradition as well
(Latif, Isaac ibn; quoted in Bernhard Pick, The Cabala, La Salle,
Illinois: Open Court, 1913). The Lecture uses these two references to
describe the structure of the relative universe; the processes by which
it was created, formed and made, and some qf the approaches by
which it can be understood. A critical reading of the first two
chapters of Genesis is rewarding for the Fellowcraft. It is instructive,
not only because it gives an indication of the processes by which the
Four Worlds unfold, but it also gives a brief glimpse into the structure
of the World of Creation, the Spiritual World. The seven periods of
creation describe seven levels within the Spiritual World. They are
analogous to the seven levels in the psyche which the Craft defines by
the seven Officers of the Lodge.
Taken together these two references, Geometry and Creation,
encapsulate much of the essence of western metaphysical cosmology.
Two other references make the Craft's cosmology complete. In any
God-centred system causality is a fundamental element and it is
incorporated into the Craft by the symbol of the Wind. The Wind is
introduced in the Lecture of the First Degree as a Divine Instrument,
the east wind which parted the Red Sea and saved the Children of
Israel from the Egyptian army. This wind, which is also said to
'refresh men at labour', is considered to be favourable when blowing
due east and west. There are several points in this image which enable
us to integrate it into our Masonic model. We have seen that east-
west is the 'dimension of consciousness', and we have observed that
the World of the Spirit is related to the element Air, while the psyche
is the Watery World. Now, the Book of Exodus and the journey from
Egypt to Caanan from which the incident at the Red Sea is taken is
itself an allegory of the psychological process which the Craft
represents as temple-building. (For a contemporary Kabbalistic
interpretation of this subject see Z'ev ben Shimon Halevi, Kabbalah
and Exodus, Rider, 1980.) In this context one sees parting of the
waters as the result of Divine Will, acting through the agency of the
Spirit (air) to produce an effect in the psyche (water). The Craft puts
the event in a broader context as one example of the favourable east
wind, and in this way defines its direction of causality from east to
west, from Divinity toward the physical world.
The final concept, which completes the Craft's allegory of the
relative universe, is the introduction of man into the model. Man is
pictured as a traveller; indeed, in some parts of the world the term
'travelling man' is a guarded synonym for a Mason. The concept of
travelling is found in all three degrees and the road is always the same
- the east-west direction - which tells us that the Mason's journey is
taken through the stages of consciousness. The Apprentice travels
from the materiality of the West and aspires to a consciousness of
Divinity in the east. This is a relatively straightforward idea and we
have seen how the work of an Apprentice starts him on that journey.
The Fellowcraft has made some progress in the easterly direction and
has access to the Middle Chamber, his Soul. In this intermediate state
he is said to travel east to receive instruction, by which we can infer
that when one withdraws to the level of consciousness represented by
the Soul, one gains valuable insights. He also travels west to teach,
which gives us some idea of the responsibility that a little progress in
the work imposes. The Master Mason comes from the East where he
is conscious of the presence of Divinity. While teaching is part of his
task, he is more directly concerned with an issue of much greater
scope as we shall see in due course. Through these three different
references to travelling, man is presented as a being who is able to
operate in all Four Worlds, to experience the entire spectrum of
consciousness represented by the east-west dimension.
In the brief paragraphs above we have seen how the Craft defines
the 'hidden mysteries of Nature and Science', and a little reading into
the seventeenth-century literature on the subject will give a clear
picture of the scope (if not the content) of the field into which the
Fellowcraft was expected to research. Like the Craft itself, we will say
little on the nature of this research beyond noting that one who
works at the (actual) Fellowcraft level can expect to develop
capacities which are presently classified as paranormal phenomena.
These capacities are highly individual and are related to a particular
person and to the task which he must accomplish in this life.
Generally speaking, they do not emerge until an individual has
achieved a substantial amount of psychological integration. To
understand how that integration comes about we must consider the
concepts introduced by the Second Degree Tracing Board.
Figure 7
elsewhere in the psyche. This idea gives us an insight into the cause
o f the difficulties which beset societies whose members live largely at
the level of ego consciousness. It also gives added emphasis to the
importance of the Command Relationship between Inner Guard/ego
and Junior Warden/Self.
The remaining subject of the Trivium is Rhetoric and is to be
associated with the Junior Deacon with whom we have already
identified the consciousness level of feeling and intuition. Rhetoric is
I he Art by which feeling is introduced into logical and well structured
communication; people are enabled to comprehend through the use
o f grammatical structure and are instructed by good logic, but they
are moved by Rhetoric. As the Junior Deacon is stationed within the
Lodge, so feelings and intuition belong to the psyche proper and not
lo the physical world. Our feelings are frequently about things in the
physical world, but they are a purely psychological phenomenon. We
saw also that Rhetoric includes formal training of the memory which
is not only an exclusively psychological process, but one which relates
to a part of the psyche of which one is normally unconscious. The
Junior Deacon is the first of the Officers to be associated with an
Order of Architecture, which suggests that at this level of
consciousness we enter the psyche proper, the area with which
Vitruvius deals when he writes of Architecture in a philosophical
sense. This is the interior temple of the psyche; and the Tuscan Order,
which is the simplest and least refined, indicates that the Junior
I )eacon/feelings represents the crudest and least sophisticated level of
purely psychological activity.
We have associated the Senior Deacon with a level of
consciousness which we have called awakening, a state of acute
alertness to events which are occurring around the individual and
within his lower psyche. Arithmetic, the first of the Sciences, is related
to the Senior Deacon. The subject deals with the properties of
numbers and the relationships between them and, although it has
myriad practical applications, arithmetic itself is entirely abstract
with no relationship to the physical world. As a practice it provides
training in the precise manipulation of abstract ideas, and it has been
used since the time of Pythagoras to convey philosophical concepts.
It is a prerequisite for the other sciences which follow in the
curriculum in the same way that a capacity for abstraction and an
ability to be 'awake' are required for progress in the interior work.
While Arithmetic points out the abstract aspects of the level of
Awakening, the Composite Order reflects the practical ones. The
Composite column combines, in a single capital, the features of all the
other orders, and is thus the most complicated of the five. In a similar
way the individual who is awake is aware of a vast complex of
considerations and ramifications which enable him to recognise that
the seemingly separate phenomena of the physical world are, in fact,
interacting parts of a single system. Indeed, this is one of the pitfalls
of the Awakening state because the integrated view of the world is
sometimes so breathtaking that it is mistaken (by credulous
candidates) for Illumination. The difference between the two states is
that Illumination is a lasting condition, while the ecstasy of
Awakening soon fades and leaves the candidate with an opportunity
to practise perseverance.
Before moving on to a consideration of the levels of consciousness
represented by the Principal Officers we should note one more point
about those represented by the Deacons. We have said that feeling
and awakening are 'purely psychological' levels of awareness and
have based this idea on two symbols: the fact that the Deacons are
positioned within the Lodge, and that each is associated with an
Order of Architecture from Vitruvius' interior model. It is significant,
also, that the Orders of Architecture belonging to the Deacons are the
Roman Orders which are considered to be the lesser of the five and
that the Deacons' place is on the Ground Floor within the Lodge.
These two points suggest that although feeling and awakening are
purely psychological levels of awareness, they are very much involved
with the interface between psyche and body and with the individual's
ability to operate in the physical world.
With the Junior Warden we begin to consider a part of the psyche
which is quite different from that represented by the Assistant
Officers, and this difference is indicated by the fact that the Junior
Warden and his colleagues are associated with the characters in the
Hiramic Legend. Without anticipating our analysis of that story we
can observe here that the staircase symbolism associates Hiram Abiff
with the Junior Warden, the level of consciousness which we have
called the Self. As the Junior Grand Warden at the building of
Solomon's Temple, Hiram Abiff was responsible for the actual day-
to-day accomplishment of the work. It is from this role and from the
association of the Junior Warden with the First Degree, that we derive
the idea of the Junior Warden/Self as the immediate director of that
part of the psyche which is in contact with the physical world and
through which we accomplish the purpose for which we incarnate.
The identification of Hiram Abiff with the Junior Warden suggests
that one who is 'self conscious' knows who he is, what he is here to
do and how to go about doing it properly. These are qualities which
make the junior Warden/Self an excellent commander for the Inner
Guard/ego.
The assignment of Geometry to the Junior Warden's step
emphasises the distinction between the principal and assistant
Officers. We have devoted a substantial amount of attention to
Geometry, and we have seen how it defines the cosmology upon
which the Craft's symbolism rests. We need not repeat the details of
that cosmology here, but only recognise that at the level symbolised
by the Junior Warden one's perspective shifts from a purely individual
view to a perspective with which one can be consciously aware of
one's place in the cosmos which Geometry describes. As the picture
of the relative universe shown in Figure 5 indicates, the Junior
Warden/Self is located at the meeting place of the three lower worlds,
and is thus in command of his physical being, at the centre of his
psyche and in contact with his spirit. It is this unique location in
consciousness which gives the Junior Warden/Self the remarkable
capacities ascribed to Hiram Abiff. We can look at the Junior Warden
from a third perspective; from the point of view of the Spark of
individual consciousness, which originates in Divinity and makes its
way through the four worlds into manifestation. In the context of this
journey the Junior Warden/Self is the farthest point of progress before
the individual incarnates. It is the 'reflection of the reflection' of its
Divine source, and it contains within itself all that it has acquired
during its journey toward manifestation. In this sense it is like the
Corinthian Column which, being the most recent and most refined of
the Greek Orders, represents the culmination and farthest
development of the Greek Architectural tradition.
The Senior Warden presides over the Middle Chamber, the Soul of
the individual. Hiram, King of Tyre is the legendary character
associated with the Senior Warden/Soul and, at first glance, it may
seem a strange connection. The Hiramic Legend does not have a great
deal to say about this personage beyond the fact that he was Senior
Grand Warden at the building of the Temple, that he was King of
Tyre, and that he provided the materials and the labour for the
project. Since Tyre was a vigorous and successful commercial port,
King Hiram appears to have been very much an influential man of the
world, and it is that which makes his connection with the Soul seem
unusual. We must remember, however, which world we are talking
about. Solomon's Temple, in the sense that we are considering it here,
is a building which exists in the psychological world; and that is the
context in which King Hiram must be evaluated. Thus the staircase
symbolism pictures the Senior Warden/Soul as a highly competent
ruler of the psyche, and our notion of the Soul as the central essence
of the psychological organism is derive^ from this image. From
Hiram's role in the legend we may infer that one who is conscious at
the level of the Senior Warden/Soul has control over the resources of
the psyche (the materials of the Temple) and over the psychological
vehicle which the individual occupies while operating in the World of
Forms. This makes the Senior Warden/Soul responsible for the proper
operation of the psyche as a whole and that brings us to the Science
of Music.
From the perspective of the winding stairs, Music has little to do
with the business of playing upon instruments which is, in any case,
an art. The Science of Music is concerned with music theory upon
which whole metaphysical systems have been based, as a glance at
Robert Fludd's work will show. Among other ideas, Fludd uses the
concept of resonance between the same notes in different octaves as
an analogy of interaction between corresponding parts of the four
worlds. Harmony is a subject which occupies a prominent place in
music theory. It deals with the relationships between the several
components which make up the musical structure, and by associating
it with the Senior Warden/Soul we infer that the Soul's functions
include maintaining a harmonious relationship between the
components of the psyche. An interesting parallel between the
physical and psychological worlds suggests itself. In the physical body
the metabolism regulates the balance between the anabolic and
katabolic processes which store energy in tissue or break down tissue
to produce energy in order that the organism can operate
satisfactorily in its environment. Similarly, the Soul regulates the
balance between the disciplinary or judgmental and the merciful or
forgiving psychological processes in order to keep the psychological
organism operating properly. Here, for the first time, we encounter
emotion which is a phenomenon of the Soul (in contrast to the
feelings of the ego); and we will consider it in greater detail in
connection with Labour in the Second Degree. The last insight which
the Staircase provides into the nature of the Soul is by reference to the
Doric Order. It is the oldest and simplest of the Greek Orders, and
there is a certain austerity about it which communicates two ideas.
The first is the concept of the Senior Warden/Soul as the paymaster.
It is a role which derives from the task of maintaining harmonious
relationships, but which also has its sombre side because the Senior
Warden pays exactly the wages that have been earned. We will look
more closely at this concept in due course. The second idea is that of
duration. The Soul and the individual to whom it belongs are things
which endure, and the age of the Doric Order conveys the notion that
the Soul existed prior to the individual's birth into the physical world
and will continue to exist after his passing out of it.
The Worshipful Master is the most senior officer of the Lodge. We
have seen how he represents that part of the psyche which is closely
associated with the world of Spirit, just as the Junior Warden is
closely involved with the physical world. As Figure 5 suggests, the
Master is in contact with the very least part of Divinity. Our
interpretation of the Winding Stairs provides three more perspectives
to assist us in understanding this level of consciousness which resides
within each human being, but which is experienced only rarely.
Solomon, King of Israel, conceived the idea to build the Temple.
While the other two Grand Officers facilitated the project or
accomplished the work, it was Solomon who saw the opportunity
and comprehended the purpose of the undertaking. There is a world
of difference between the level of competence of the two Grand
Masters who read the plans and constructed the building and that of
Solomon, who understands the Grand Design (or at least the part of
it involving him) and acts, as a free agent, to bring (his part of) the
Design to fruition. This difference in competence gives us a clue about
the difference between the Psychological and Spiritual Worlds. The
psychological perspective is orientated toward the individual; the
spiritual perspective, while recognising the individual and
acknowledging his value, at the same time transcends the personal
view and understands the individual as being an essential part of the
Grand Design. As we have seen, the Tracing Board, the Immovable
jewel associated with the Master, reflects this idea. It is an instrument
of design which relates not to individual stones, but to the whole
structure containing many stones property related.
The science of astronomy (or more properly, astrology) is assigned
to the step of the Worshipful Master/Spirit and the association
extends the idea of a transcendent perspective introduced above.
While it has become a commonplace to say that the observation of
the Heavens gives one an appreciation of the Majesty of Divinity, it
is nonetheless true that contemplation of the night sky can give one a
glimpse of the feeling of awe which is one characteristic of contact
with one's Spirit (in fact, the relationship between the Junior
Warden/Self and the Worshipful Master/Spirit is called the Path of
Awe in some traditions). From the Astrological perspective, which is
the one likely to have been taken by the Craft's founders, the study of
the Heavens enables one to obtain an insight into the Divine Plan.
Whether or not one can legitimately interpret astrological data in that
fashion is an open question today. However, the Mason who practises
his Craft from the point of view we are considering here would do
well to accept Isaac Newton's advice and make a thorough, open-
minded study of the subject before formulating an opinion. The
legitimacy of Astrology notwithstanding, from the point of view of
interpreting the staircase symbolism, the intention is quite clear; the
level of consciousness represented by the Worshipful Master/Spirit
has access to a view of the Grand Design. The Worshipful Master is
also identified with the Ionic Order of Architecture. The Ionic Order
is in many ways a middle ground. The capital is a symmetrical
balance between two decorative volutes. These can be thought of as
representing the source of the active and passive principles which are
integrated at the level of the spirit. The overall Ionic style
incorporates the strength of the Doric Order without its bluntness
and the grace of the Corinthian Order, without its exuberance. This
balanced integration of architectural qualities reflects the integration
of the components of the psyche which occurs for one who is
conscious at the level of the Worshipful Master/Spirit.
These comments on the staircase symbolism are quite inadequate
as descriptions of levels of consciousness. If the descriptions of the
Guards seem more 'realistic' and 'precise' than those of the Principal
Officers, that is because the Guards' levels of consciousness are
familiar in our common experience. In a very real sense one cannot
describe a level of consciousness at all; the thing must be experienced
to be comprehended. In one way of thinking, the very purpose of
Masonic Labour is to climb this staircase of consciousness and the
purpose of the symbols is to give a clue about the experience at each
step. With this in mind we can turn again to the Second Tracing
Board itself, and consider other symbols which give an insight into
the dynamics of the psyche at this level and will assist us in our
ascent.
The person who examines the interior reasons for his behaviour also
begins to recognise that under some circumstances it might be better
if he behaved differently. We have seen that the purpose of the super-
ego-ideal is to enable the individual to fit into his society. As the
Fellowcraft begins to have access to the material stored in the two
pillars, that is the experiences which form his super-ego-ideal or his
emotional and intellectual complexes, he comes to realise that the
literal interpretation which his unconscious places upon this stored-
up experience may not always produce the best result or generate the
wisest counsel to govern his behaviour. He then begins to analyse the
requirements of his society and to choose to comply with them when
it is appropriate; but now he can also choose not to comply, or to
comply in some new and original way, when the circumstances
require it. Such a person becomes more of an individual, more in
possession of himself, and is in a position to be more understanding
and tolerant of others. The individual who has reached this stage is
at the point of a very profound change. His situation in the past has
been rather like that of a navigator who is guiding his ship down a
well-known coast. He shapes his course by reference to the familiar
landmarks which appear as the voyage progresses. There comes a
time, however, when the ship's destination requires that it venture out
of sight of land and at that point the navigator must cease to depend
upon external references and must shape his course solely by
reference to instruments carried within the ship. This is the point at
which the Fellowcraft finds himself. Heretofore, he has made his
judgments of right and wrong on the basis of the rules of his society.
Now he finds that he can judge right and wrong for himself and that
frequently he must do so. When he was an Apprentice, Providence
placed him in positions in which he could learn to control the
functions of his lower nature. Now, Providence acts to place him in
situations in which the conventionally correct answer is not good
enough. In these situations, the essentially external references
provided by the super-ego-ideal offer solutions which are acceptable
to the world at large but which the individual knows to be of
questionable morality. Alternatively, they may offer no help at all. In
cither case, the maturing Fellowcraft knows that some internal
reference is required which defines the truly correct course of action
in the situations in which he now finds himself.
The Craft represents this internal moral reference by the three
Working Tools of the Second Degree and labour in this degree
consists, in large measure, of recognising the influence of the quite
arbitrary rules of his super-ego-ideal (or the compulsions of his
complexes) and replacing them with those absolute standards of
morality which he finds to be within his Middle Chamber, that is
within his Soul.
Evil
In the ordinary way of things, most people do not encounter evil.
They experience the effects of evil and suffer a great deal as a result,
but real evil implies free choice. That is why 'the insidious' are
introduced in the Second Degree. In the everyday view, evil is
considered to be a power which opposes good; and the Devil, the
principal agent of evil, is understood to be in competition with the
Holy One, striving to undo His works and to enslave His followers.
This concept of evil is a useful approximation on which to build rules
of conduct for ordinary life in the physical world. However, for those
involved in trying to understand themselves and their relationship to
the universe and Deity, this conventional view raises a problem more
serious than any that it answers. The difficulty is that an evil power
supposes a power separate from God, whereas we have seen that our
cosmology is based on a God without limit who has brought the
entire relative universe and all it contains into being by an act of It's
will. Such a cosmology is incompatible with the existence of a
separate power. Indeed, the acknowledgment of an infinite Deity is
incompatible with the notion of anything opposing It.
In fact, a careful examination of the Bible (to use the West's most
familiar version of the Volume of Sacred Law) suggests a role of evil
quite different from the ordinary view, and most other scriptures
provide a similar content. In the story of Genesis, the archangels and
angels had been created and were performing their tasks before
mankind appeared on the scene on the sixth day. Now we are told
that while the angels and archangels are created beings (that is they
have their source in the World of Creation, the Spiritual World), man
is of a different nature, having been made 'in the image of God', that
is, having his source in the Divine World. When man appeared in
creation on the sixth day, the angelic beings were told that Mankind
was their superior, being of a different and higher order. This Divine
announcement produced a mixed reaction among the angels. The
majority, led by Michael, recognised this situation and accepted it.
However, about a third did not. This dissident group was led by
Lucifer, whose name means 'the Bearer of the Light', and who was,
at that time, the most intelligent and high ranking of the created
beings. We are told that he could not bring himself to accept the fart
that there could be a created being superior to himself. As a result of
Lucifer's refusal to accept man's position, there ensued the 'War in
Heaven' which culminated in the expulsion of Lucifer and the Angels
who had sided with him. There is clearly some need to interpret this
anthropomorphic imagery which was devised to represent a conflict
of principles and ideas (the content of the Heavenly World) to an
ancient culture. We can, however, obtain some quite useful
information from it. First, Lucifer's enmity is not with Deity, but with
man, whom he sees as supplanting him. Second, it appears that the
Deity has chosen to make use of Lucifer in his rebellious state. The
Book of Job indicates clearly that there remains close communication
between Deity and Satan, as Lucifer came to be called in his new role;
and it also gives insight into the nature of that role.
Satan, in Hebrew, means 'the Tester'; and it is his task, and that of
his associates, to travel throughout the Three Worlds of Separation
(east and west through all the levels of consciousness) to test the
quality of individual human beings and to lead them away from their
easterly course, if possible. It is a task for which he is well qualified,
first because he was once the highest of created beings and thus
knows his way round and second because of his irreconcilable enmity
towards mankind. If we are to believe the Book of Job, the testers are
permitted to use all manner of deception and to break every rule
except that they may not destroy the individual (although they may
lead the individual to destroy himself). It is to the actions of these
beings that the Craft refers when it warns against the 'attacks of the
insidious' and, although Satan and his associates cause a serious
threat to the progress of an individual, they also play a constructive
role in the universe, perhaps in spite of their intention.
We saw in the previous section that as an individual grows, in the
sense of knowing himself, he is able to choose, he is able to act more
freely and to exercise his own will. He is therefore able to exercise
progressively more influence in the world, and to do proportionately
more damage if he chooses to act with selfish or malicious intent.
This ability to do damage is inherent in man's capacity for free will,
and if one examines history, one can see, on occasions, the very point
at which a central figure chose wrongly, sometimes with the most
serious consequences. Napoleon Bonaparte provides an unusually
visible example. He embodied, at first, the democratic spirit which
was transforming Europe at the end of the eighteenth century, and he
had the opportunity to introduce important social and political
reform. Indeed, early in his career he was received not as a conqueror,
but as a liberator who would establish the new social order
throughout the land. However, at the ceremony during which he was
being crowned Emperor by the Pope (who had journeyed to Paris for
the occasion) he took the crown from the Pope's hands and placed it
on his own head. We can see, in this moment, the action of the Tester.
Napoleon was a man of great ability who had the opportunity
(indeed the task) to bring real peace and unity to Europe which
needed it desperately at the time. At the moment of his coronation he
transferred his commitment from the service of the Divine purpose to
the service of his own ego. This incident with the crown is, of itself,
of little consequence; but it reveals the change in Napoleon's
psychological motivation, the erosion of his personal integrity.
Napoleon's temptation and the resulting loss of integrity, which gave
Europe decades of war instead of the promised social and political
reform, is an example of the operation of the Lucific principle, an
'attack of the insidious'.
It is instructive to consider the 'testing by the Wardens' in this
context. That important aspect of the First and Second Degree
Ceremonies, in which the Wardens 'examine the work' of the
candidate, represents a process which occurs within the psyche of the
individual and which involves only the various components of the
individual's own psychological being. As the individual grows and
develops his increased capacities, the Wardens, representing his Self
and his Soul - the seat of his morality - examine the way in which he
uses these abilities, and approve or criticise. This is the activity of a
mature conscience. As long as the individual keeps himself within the
limits established by his Wardens he will have little difficulty. He will
experience temptation, to be sure; the insidious are an 'external
agency' whose job it is to test the quality of individuals. However, a
person who has encouraged an internal stability by keeping within
the bounds of his own conscience will be prepared to meet these tests
when they come. It is the person who has ignored the critique of the
Wardens in their testing capacities that is most susceptible to
temptation, most likely to sin.
Sin is a concept which is understood differently by different
people. Almost all agree that it is bad; but its impact on the
individual, its long-term implications, and the remedies appropriate
to mitigate its effects are the concerns of an individual's religion and
quite outside the purview of the Craft. From the more limited
perspective of our present interpretation the effect of sin is to retard,
or block, the individual's progress in coming to understand himself.
The word means 'to miss the mark' and it is, in this limited sense, an
error. There are a great many different errors, but we can usefully
think of them as each being a misapplication of some perfectly proper
activity. We can associate a sin with each of the Officers of the Lodge
and with each of the Working Tools. It is a useful concept because, if
we do find ourselves in difficulty, it helps in the understanding of the
problem. For example, the Tyler gone wrong fails to check the intake
at the physical level; either he admits improper material or an
excessive amount. The Tyler's sin is Gluttony. If the Deacons or Inner
Guard should fail, they report inaccurate information or carry
erroneous messages; the sin is False Witness. The obvious
misapplication of the Gavel or the creative, passionate side of one's
nature is Lust; while the improper use of one's analytical faculty, or
Chisel, results in Sloth. When we look at the Second Degree's tools
we find that one relates to the faculty of judgment and discipline, and
its associated sin is Anger. The complementary tool relates to
kindness and generosity, and when used wrongly its sin is Malice.
Every level - even that of the Worshipful Master - has its temptation
and corresponding sin (remember that before his fall Lucifer was the
highest of created beings). The sin which is usually associated with
the three Principal Officers, that is with achievement of some higher
level of consciousness, is Pride. These are the 'Seven Deadly Sins' and
they are used, in some variation or combination by 'the insidious' to
lead the maturing Fellowcraft away from his objective. Like all good
quality-control engineers, the insidious direct their tests at the most
vulnerable and least well-controlled area of the psyche. Those who
fail the test frequently cause substantial damage as they fail, but the
long-term effect of the Tester's work is to prevent human beings from
growing so rapidly that they acquire capabilities they cannot handle.
As with the situations which develop skill in the use of the
Working Tools, the tests come in the context of one's life experiences.
It will be instructive to look at a pair of samples which indicate that
the tests at this level become quite stringent. Consider the
businessman who had done very well when employed as a senior
manager, and by means of saving and careful investment had been
able to accumulate a substantial sum of money. He also had a strong
sense of social responsibility and was severely critical of exploitive
business practice. When he felt the moment right, he took early
retirement and started a manufacturing business of his own in a
provincial city. There was little competition for his products; and
because of his charm, ability and considerable reputation, he was
immediately able to attract a small customer base which would carry
his business comfortably through its first years of modest operation
while he established the foundation of a solid concern. At the same
time he saw in the enthusiastic consumer response for one of his
products the opportunity to make the business grow very rapidly.
This opportunity for rapid growth required substantial risk not only
to his own capital, but to the financial positions of his other
investors, creditors and employees, and to his clients who depended
heavily upon his firm for an uninterrupted supply of high-quality
products. The growth opportunity also involved stretching the
representations about his products to the very limit. None of it was,
however, illegal. Within the context of the ordinary rules, the
behaviour demanded by the high growth opportunity was acceptable.
Faced with this choice of growing slowly, with discipline,
responsibility and integrity, or quickly, with abandon and
questionable ethics, he chose the latter and more risky route. In the
Masonic terminology this test required integrity, the application of
the Square. It demanded the discipline of the Level to contain the
ambition, expansion and passion of the Plumb and Gavel. In the
event, he did not exercise that internal discipline. As the company's
situation deteriorated he concerned himself less and less with the
questions of morality and social responsibility which had been so
important to him previously, and more and more with expedient
behaviour. Operating, at last, entirely from the level of the ego, he
began to say 'If it's legal, it's all right'. When his business finally
failed, he lost his home, his savings, his reputation and the respect of
his clients, employees and friends. The essential thing to note in this
situation is the opportunity for choice. Businesses fail all the time, but
in this situation the opportunity for success by slow, steady growth
was almost assured. The test came when the individual chose to
embark on the course of action which required behaviour he knew
was wrong and of which he had, himself, been critical on previous
occasions.
Sometimes, the test is less spectacular. A well-established and
fashionable artist was recently approached by a young art student
seeking advice about his work. The older woman was shocked by the
realisation that the student's talent was greater than her own and
more deeply disturbed to realise that she felt threatened by the
student's talent. She faced a choice; she could acknowledge the young
man's talent and encourage it, or she could criticise harshly in an
attempt to destroy the talent which she saw as a threat to herself. This
was a test of pride, which she failed when she criticised her student
and depreciated his work. Only a few will know, only those friends
from whom the student sought to find encouragement. Some are
artists themselves who will take note of the event. But, in any ca&,
she will have lost an opportunity to grow herself, and, in some way,
she will become smaller. If she persists in such behaviour, she will
eventually destroy her reputation, her talent and herself. It may seem
that these circumstances are ordinary occurrences which happen to
everyone. It is, in some ways, true that they are ordinary events - the
curriculum for growth works through the events of the world. The
quality which sets both these examples of tests apart from every day
life is the fact that the individual had the opportunity to make a
moral choice about two actions both of which were 'legal' in the
ordinary sense, but one of which was 'wrong'. This is true free will
with all its responsibilities, and the ability to exercise it is one of the
characteristics of work at the level of the Soul.
3 DEATH
In spite of the meaning conventionally attributed to the ritual, the
death which is enacted by the candidate in the Third Degree is quite
clearly not the physical death which terminates our period in
incarnation; for at its conclusion the ritual includes reuniting the
candidate with 'the companions of his former toils'. The ceremony
implies an event which is much more profound and very much less
frequently experienced than the death of the body. Nonetheless, the
act of dying is one of the human processes most commonly used as
an allegorical representation of this more profound event which
occurs deep within the being of the mature and properly prepared
candidate; and an examination of that physical process will serve us
as a starting point for our attempt to glimpse the nature of the event
itself.
From the clinical point of view, death comes when the biological
machinery ceases to operate and the body begins to decompose into
its constituent chemicals. From the perspective of a materialistic
philosopher, the cessation of body function is the cause of death, and
that (apart from the chemistry of decomposition) is all there is to it.
The Craft's point of view of death is very different. We have seen
throughout that the human being is considered to be a native of the
Upper Worlds. He has a soul which acquires a body when it
incarnates at moment of birth. The individual human being occupies
his body in much the same way that a driver occupies his automobile
and the cessation of biological function, rather than being the cause
of natural death, is the result of the vacating of the body by its
occupant. In our model of the relative universe (Figure 5) there seems
to be a definite barrier between each of the Four Worlds. The barrier
between the Divine World and the World of Creation is referred to as
'the Abyss' in the description of creation in Genesis 1, and a similar
barrier exists at the boundary between the remaining Three Worlds.
Birth appears to be a process by which the individual, inhabiting the
Psychological World, acquires a vehicle suitable for operation in the
Physical World. As the child grows, he develops his ego, which, as we
have seen, acts as an agency by which the individual operates across
the boundary between the physical and psychological worlds. In the
Craft's symbolism, we have seen this boundary represented by the
door of the Lodge, and the Inner Guard, who controls the passages
across that boundary, is the Craft's representation of the ego's
function. In this way we can say that every incarnate human being
operates in two worlds, or at least in part of them. Physical death is
the individual's transition - in consciousness - back across the barrier
between the physical and psychological worlds. In this context, birth
and death can be seen as processes by which individuals cross the
boundary between the two lowest worlds. Birth is the process of
extending the consciousness 'downward' (in Figure 5) into the
physical world, and death the process of transition in an 'upward'
direction. We can think of incarnate humanity as the agency by which
a conscious link across that barrier between the psychological and
physical worlds is maintained. To this extent, it would seem that the
evolution of mankind has already made some progress in repairing
the loss described in the Legend of Creation. We have seen that man
is a being which is capable of conscious operation in all Four Worlds;
but at the present level of development of human consciousness the
majority of mankind bridges the boundary between only the lowest
two. The purpose of the transition in the Third Degree is to enable
the candidate to penetrate the barrier between the Psychological and
Spiritual worlds. It is analogous to the transition ordinarily
associated with physical death, but it relates to the next higher
boundary, and it is to be accomplished while the candidate remains
incarnate. With this concept of birth and death as a 'boundary
crossing' activity, we can approach consideration of the allegorical
death in the Ceremony of Raising.
The newly obligated Master Mason is provided with a brief
recapitulation of the first two Degrees. While it is not generally
appreciated by the candidate, this recapitulation puts his position in
perspective and it serves as an indicator of the sort of person to whom
the event symbolised by the Raising is likely to happen. Starting with
the ordinary ego consciousness, he has made contact with his Self, the
individual occupying the body. He has brought his passions and
analytical capacities of that physical vehicle under control so that it
has become a reliable servant. He has brought much of what is
generally known as the unconscious into his consciousness and
investigated the relationships and interactions between the
Psychological and Physical Worlds. He has been tempted to misuse
the abilities which this understanding and these investigations have
given him, and he has demonstrated his moral soundness by resisting
those temptations. In the process, he has developed his own will. It is
this man, in control of his psyche and his body and in a large measure
understanding the relationship of both to the Divine Plan, who is
'entitled to demand that last and greatest trial'.
It is unnecessary to comment on the details of the ceremony by
which the candidate is introduced to the transition process of which
death is the allegory, but we can extract some of the principles from
it. We have already seen that it is the crossing of a barrier between
worlds. We should note that it is not the ego which is slain, that was
subjugated long ago. It is the Self, symbolised by the Junior Warden
in the Lodge and the Junior Grand Warden in the traditional history,
that 'dies'. That Self is the individual, the resident of the
Psychological World, who must be true to his principles and
surrender his will (which he has worked so hard to attain) and his
concept of himself to the demands of a greater purpose. Note that in
this process the trusted functions of the psyche which have been
developed with such care are actually a liability in this situation. This
is because the individual, who had once thought of himself as a body
and now considers himself to be a psychological being, is about to
cross the threshold between the Psychological and Spiritual Worlds.
To do so he must die to his concept of himself as a Self (the essence
of the psychological organism) in order to realise his identity as a
Spiritual being who possesses a Self; just his Self possesses a body.
The allegorical death represents the entry into this transition process.
The act of Raising represents the emergence from the transition
process into the World of the Spirit. Notice that the two Wardens,
both representations of lower parts of the psyche, cannot accomplish
this process, but the Worshipful Master, representing that part of the
psyche at the level of the Spirit and in contact with Divinity,
accomplishes the task with the help of the Wardens. The Lecture on
the Third Degree indicates that one is enabled to be raised by 'the
help of God [Divinity], the united aid of the Square [Psyche] and
Compasses [Spirit] and my own industry (the Masonic Labour of the
candidate)'. The Lecture goes on to say that the candidate has been
raised 'from a superficial flat to a lively perpendicular'. The reference
is to the geometric progression by which the Craft describes the Four
Worlds, and shows quite clearly that the candidate is considered to
have crossed the barrier between the 'superficies' of the psyche and
the 'line' of the spirit.
The posture into which the candidate is raised is of great
importance. It is a symbol of the oneness which pervades the relative
universe. Heretofore, it has been one of the fundamental principles
upon which the Craftsman has based his work; now it is a conscious
experience. At this point in the ceremony the lights in the Lodge joom
are turned on, indicating to the candidate that his transition is
complete and that he is now able to see by the ambient light of a
Master Mason's Lodge. It is by this light that he will perform his
Labours in the Third Degree.
2 INDIVIDUAL LABOUR
It may be that the reader will find that these ideas are meaningful to
him, he may feel that there seems to he something to this
interpretation and that it may be worth pursuing. The question then
arises, 'What do I do next?'
Should such a one not be a Mason, he should realise there are many
idioms by which this work can be undertaken, and that of these the
Craft is only one. A person interested in this work should take some
care in evaluating a group or school before joining it. We have
indicated the importance of integrity on the part of those who teach in
this work. Sadly, some tutors fall short of the mark, and they should
be avoided. In general one should be wary of any group which solicits
membership. A very useful rule for evaluating any working group te
that it should be hard to find, harder to enter and easy to leave. If it
does not meet these criteria, the group is probably better left alone.
Should an individual be convinced that the Craft's idiom is
appropriate for him, he must petition a Lodge for the Three Degrees,
because it is not possible to practise the Craft properly outside the
framework of a Masonic Lodge. Such a person must be prepared to
do a substantial amount of independent work because the point of
view expressed in this book is not widely found in the contemporary
Craft. Nonetheless, Providence has a way of directing serious seekers,
and the door of a Masonic Lodge is certainly a way into the Mysteries.
It is more difficult to give advice about individual practice to one
who is already a Mason and who wishes to pursue the Craft from this
point of view. The ideas that follow provide only the most elementary
outline; but they too, if seriously practised, will result in providential
direction, which in the last analysis is the only kind worth having.
One of the most important considerations is an appropriate attitude
toward authoritative statements (including those in the preceding
pages), and the best attitude one can adopt is 'sceptical faith'. We can
learn a great deal from the student of physics in a contemporary
university. He reads about a physical principle in his text book, then
he attends a lecture on the subject, finally he goes to the laboratory
where he conducts an experiment which demonstrates the principle.
The faculty of the university is trying to encourage the student in the
use of the scientific method, which avoids faith in authority and relies
entirely on data collected in controlled experiments. But the
circumstances surrounding the educational process poses a dilemma
because; if the student does not 'believe' the authoritative material in
the text and lectures, he will have to recapitulate the entire history of
science in the laboratory in a single year. In practice, the student does
'accept the authority' of his tutors, trusting that the science faculty
will not mislead him, but he verifies their teachings with his own
work in the laboratory. A student wishing to practice the Craft in the
way we have considered it might well adopt a similar point of view.
He should receive the guidance of his teachers with tentative
acceptance, but he should verify his teachers' statements in his own
experience. And like the Physics student connecting wires for an
experiment in high voltage electricity, the student of interior work
should not undertake work he does not understand or which violates
his common sense.
As far as practical work is concerned, first, learn the Ritual. The
plain labour of learning it by rote is an exercise which will limber up
those psychological functions symbolised by the Gavel (repetitive
action) and the Chisel (communication). Then participate in the ritual
whenever possible. Ritual is a peculiar thing. Badly done, it is worse
than useless; but ritual which is well done is, in itself, not enough.
The essential point is that to perform complicated ritual properly one
must be awake; and being awake makes one receptive to the meaning
which is implicit in the ritual and symbols.
Second, make use of the Opening and Closing. We have seen that
the Lodge is a model of the individual psyche which shows the person
to have, at his centre, a contact with Divinity. The Ceremonies of
Opening and Closing the Lodge represent the opening of the
consciousness to that Divine Centre and closing it again with
reverence. A brief analysis of the Opening will be of assistance to
those who would use it in this way. The ceremony starts when the
Master knocks, in response to which the Tyler presents himself and is
posted. A similar process posts the Inner Guard. This fragment of
ritual symbolises the process by which one makes one's self secure
from interruption and turns one's ego consciousness from the
concerns of the physical world to the Temple within (symbolised by
the Lodge). With the Temple secure, the Master names each Officer
and reviews his duties. From the perspective we have adopted, we can
understand this part of the ritual as recalling and activating each level
of consciousness in the psyche in turn. Before declaring the Lodge
open, the Master invokes the blessing of Deity. This piece of ritual,
which takes only a moment, is of critical importance. No one should
undertake interior work without Divine Permission; and if, for some
reason, that permission is withheld, the work should be postponed -
the Lodge should not be opened. Only after the assurance of the
approbation of Deity does the Master open his Lodge and commence
the labour of the evening.
In order to use this ceremony in one's own work, one should set
aside a period each day for devotion and meditation; open that period
by reciting the Ceremony of Opening, make such prayers, devotions
and meditations as one's conscience and religion direct, and close the
period with the Ceremony of Closing.
Third, familiarise yourself with the Lectures and with the material
to which they refer. It will give an insight into the philosophical turn
of mind held by the early practitioners of the Craft. Learn to draw the
Tracing Board of each Degree. Practice until you can draw them from
memory. As you draw them, review in your mind the principles which
are represented by the various objects as they are discussed in the
Lectures. The Craft's symbolism is internally consistent. Remember
the rule that the symbolic structure cannot be changed; refine your'
concepts of the symbols until they reflect the consistency which is
inherent in the Craft. Remember that the principles are operating
within you and in the world every day. Observe their operation and
understand what is happening to you.
Lastly, remember your Lodge at regular intervals. This is a very old
practice among groups involved in the work, and has various
benefits. For the individual, the process of remembering is, again, an
exercise of the Gavel and Chisel. For the group, it is much more. A
group (or Lodge), like everything else in the relative universe, exists
in the several worlds. By calling the Lodge into consciousness and
thinking about it, one invests psychological energy in it, and it
becomes 'sharper' at the psychological level. There are a few Lodges
whose members have practised this remembrance diligently for many
years, and entering such a Lodge is an unforgettable experience.
Visitors sense the 'atmosphere' and never fail to comment on it.
Although they do not understand it, they know it is different,
welcoming, dedicated. One who wishes to use this practice should
call his Lodge and Brethren into his consciousness daily at regular
intervals, say 10.00 a.m., Noon and 3.00 p.m.; recall the obligations
they have to each other and the world, and commit them to the Deity
with a brief prayer, perhaps the Tyler's Toast. The process should not
require more than thirty seconds.
These exercises of individual labour are all that can, or need, be
given in such a book as this. If they are practised faithfully, they will
produce tangible results of great benefit. But one who would walk in
the Way of the Craftsman must do one thing more. He must
remember, always, that he is building a temple to God. He is building
an edifice in consciousness in which he, himself, is an individual
stone. In time, each human being will square his stone and place it in
that temple, and when that temple is complete, God will behold God
in the Mirror of Existence and there will be then, as there was at the
beginning, only God.
To all poor and distressed Masons
wherever dispersed over the face
of Earth and Water;
Wishing them a speedy relief from
all their suffering and a safe return
to their native country;
Should they so desire it.
Note for American Readers
In England in the latter half of the eighteenth century there were two
bodies which claimed jurisdiction over the activities of Masons in
that country. (In fact there were four, of which only two are of real
significance. For a complete treatment of the subject of early history
of the Grand Lodge of England see: John Hamill, The Craft
(Crucible, 1986) and Harry Sadler, Masonic Facts and Fictions
(Aquarian Press, 1985)). These two Grand Lodges, generally referred
to as the 'Ancients' and the 'Moderns', enjoyed a lively, and
sometimes tempestuous, competition; and it was inevitable that this
rivalry should be reflected in the North American colonies. In the
decades prior to the American Revolution there was general
agreement among the American colonists that the English
government was not treating them fairly. There was, however,
substantial disagreement about the remedies which were appropriate.
While many thought that independence was the only satisfactory
solution, there were also numerous people who felt a strong
allegiance to the Crown and were disinclined to break that
connection. While it would be overstating the situation to say that
Masonry in the colonies was divided on this issue, it is true that the
Ancients, who were generally the more egalitarian of the two bodies,
tended to attract members who were inclined toward independence,
while those who felt a strong connection with England often found
their way into Lodges chartered by the Moderns. At the end of the
Revolutionary War this pattern of membership resulted in a marked
reduction in the influence of the Moderns over Masonry in the United
States. As Grand Lodges formed in each of the States they did so
largely from Lodges which originally owed allegiance to the Ancient
Grand Lodge; and those Modern Lodges which remained were, in
general, assimilated into this system. As a result, the symbolic
structure which is characteristic of American Masonry was derived,
generally speaking, from that of the Ancient Grand Lodge (and also
from Scottish Lodges).
The situation was quite different in England. Both Grand Lodges
were well established, and by the beginning of the nineteenth century
it was clear to many members of both bodies that it was in their best
interests, and the best interests of Masons generally, that the Craft
be governed by a single authoritative body. To accomplish this a
Lodge of Reconciliation was formed by an action of the two bodies
which merged to form the United Grand Lodge of England in 1813.
The task of the Lodge of Reconciliation was to formulate the
symbolic structure and ritual which was to be used by the United
Grand Lodge. In doing so, it used material from both Modern and
Ancient workings and this produced a symbolic structure which,
while containing some new material, is in many ways more
representative of general Masonic practice and thought than either
of its progenitors. It is this symbolic structure which is interpreted in
this book. However, an American Mason will find that the symbolic
structure devised by the Lodge of Reconciliation differs in some
ways from that used in the United States, since the American
symbolism did not pass through that evolutionary process. With this
in mind we will comment briefly on the differences between the two
systems and on how the American Mason might interpret the
symbolism with which he is familiar in the context set out in this
book. (The material presented in this book is by no means a
comprehensive treatment of English Masonic symbols. For such an
examination see: Colin Dyer, Symbolism in Craft Freemasonry (A.
Lewis, 1976)).
The basic structure of the English and American craft symbolism
is very similar, in general terms, and only two areas of difference
require our attention here. These are the Officers of the Lodge and
the Working Tools. In general, in the American jurisdictions one finds
that a Private Lodge has six officers who are involved directly with
the ritual; a Master, two Wardens, two Deacons, and a Tyler. (In some
American Grand Lodges the Stewards have a large ritual role, and in
a few there is an Inner Sentinel.) To these six Officers, Lodges formed
under the English constitution add a seventh officer, the Inner Guard.
He is stationed inside the Lodge, at the door; and he controls access
in and out under the direction of the Junior Warden. When we
consider the Lodge as a model of the human psyche (which is one of
the principal notions upon which this book is based) we attach
considerable importance to the Inner Guard, who performs a role
comparable to that of the ego. In interpreting the American symbolic
structure, we must conceive that the Junior Deacon incorporates the
functions of the ego/Inner Guard into his own office of messenger.
This is not an unreasonable interpretation, since it places the ego
inside the Lodge.
With respect to Working Tools, English Lodges recognise three
tools belonging to each Degree; and in this book we consider one of
each set to be active or expansive, another passive or containing, and
the third co-ordinating. In the American jurisdictions the Apprentice
has only two tools, the Gavel and the Twenty-four-inch Gauge. In
interpreting the American tools we should say that the Gavel
represents force, passion and active psychological functions, while
the Gauge represents mental processes, analysis, and the containing
functions, and that it is the business of the Apprentice to keep them
in balance. We can be encouraged in this view by the fact that Albert
Pike advances a similar notion in Morals and Dogma. The tools of
the Second Degree are identical in both systems and do not require
our attention in this note. The English tools of the Third Degree, and
the concepts they represent, do not appear to be alluded to directly in
the American symbolic structure. Nonetheless, the tool which is
identified with the Master Mason in American Lodges is, like those
considered in these pages, concerned with the relationship between
stones. Thus, although the emphasis is different in each system, the
symbols in both systems indicate that the work of a Master Mason
transcends individual considerations and relates to a trans-personal
activity.
These brief comparisons of English and American Craft symbolism
will, it is to be hoped, present sufficient stimulating clues to enable
the American Masonic reader to relate his own symbolic structure to
the ideas which are presented in these pages.
Index
T h e Author
W . Kirk MacNulty was born in California in 1932. He studied at
Standford University and the University of Tennessee, and has followed
military and business careers. His involvement in freemasonry spans more
than 39 years. H e is the author of several papers and books.
ISBN 0 9 5 4 2 5 1 6 0 1
13 N E W T O N R O A D
H A R R O W B R O O K INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
H I N C K L E Y , L E I C E S T E R S H I R E . LE10 3DS
5 055015 058480 TEL: 01455 614911 or 01455 638920