Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Abstract
This study conducted creep tests for inorganic and organic types of post-installed anchors. The slope of the load
displacement curve at the time of the bond strength test and the beginning of the creep test was equivalent to
approximately 1/3 of the ultimate load. The slope of the inorganic-type anchor was more than 1.5 times that of
the organic type.
The displacement at creep failure during the creep test was approximately two times that at the ultimate load
regardless of the anchor type. The times to reach the displacement at the ultimate load were estimated at the free
and load ends. The estimated value from the result of the free end was smaller than that from the load end.
Accordingly, a remarkable difference between the estimated values from the load and free ends was observed in
the specimen with a small amount of creep deformation.
The displacement variation of 1 to 90 days was examined to estimate the creep limit of the post-installed
anchors. The displacement variation in the organic-type anchor became quite larger at a stress level of
approximately more than 0.50. In comparison, the variation of the inorganic-type anchor increased at a stress
level of ~0.60.7. Assuming that the creep limits of the post-installed anchors were represented by the inflection
points of the variationstress level curves, the creep limits of the inorganic and organic types are ~0.60.7 and
~0.50, respectively.
1. Introduction
The ceiling of the Ted Williams Tunnel in South Boston, Massachusetts, USA collapsed on July 10, 2006. The
National Transportation Safety Board subsequently released a report about the accident mainly attributing the
collapse to epoxy creep [1]. Meanwhile, the concrete ceiling panels inside the Sasago Tunnel in Japan
collapsed on December 2, 2012. It has been a topic of concern that the used post-installed anchors of the ceiling
panels may have deteriorated from long-term use. Post-installed anchors are essential for successful construction
when equipment is attached to a concrete structure. These post-installed anchors can be exactly and easily
positioned. More than 500 million post-installed anchors are used in Japan annually, which makes their safety an
important topic. However, only a few studies have been conducted on the tensile creep behavior of the post-
installed bonded anchors in Japan. Accordingly, Yano et al. studied the creep behavior of the post-installed
anchors of polyester resin [2], while Nakano et al. studied the anchors of epoxy ester [3]. The creep behavior of
the organic-type bonded anchors is summarized in the book entitled Anchorage in Concrete Construction [4].
Nevertheless, few studies have focused on the creep behavior of the inorganic-type post-installed bonded
anchors. This study is conducted to investigate deformation and compare the inorganic and organic types of
post-installed bonded anchors.
16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017
Santiago Chile, January 9th to 13th 2017
2
16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017
Santiago Chile, January 9th to 13th 2017
Load cell
M 14 Spherical seat
125
Center hole
D 13 hydraulic jack
120 Stressing chair
Bonded anchor Steel plate Specimen
Concrete L
Steel pipe
91
Displacement
F
meter
206
3
16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017
Santiago Chile, January 9th to 13th 2017
Clamp
Displacement meter
F
Specimen
91
Steel plate
Dispalcement meter
L
200
Coupling
435
Coil spring
Load cell
600
Hydraulic jack
3. Results
3.1 Bond strength
Table 4 shows the results of the bond strength test. The bond strengths (b1) were calculated using the following
equation:
where b1 = bond strength, Pmax = ultimate load, da1 = nominal diameter of the deformed bar, and lb =
embedment length.
The average ultimate loads of the In-30N and Ep-30N anchors were 110.2 kN and 122.7 kN, respectively. As
for the failure mode, bond failure occurred after rebar yielding at all the specimens with a concrete strength of
30 N/mm2. The bond strengths of the In-24N and Ea-24N anchors were 25.1 N/mm2 and 22.6 N/mm2,
respectively. The data were not used for the average because the hardening failure only occurred in one
specimen even if three specimens were tested in the Ea-24N anchors. As regards the displacement of the free end
at the time of ultimate load, the displacement of the Ea-24N anchors was about two times that of the In-24N
anchors. Similarly, the displacement of the Ep-30N anchors was larger than that of the In-30N anchors. As a
result, the displacement of the organic type was larger than that of the inorganic type. The difference in the
material characteristics has appeared.
4
16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017
Santiago Chile, January 9th to 13th 2017
5
16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017
Santiago Chile, January 9th to 13th 2017
6
16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017
Santiago Chile, January 9th to 13th 2017
S(t) = So + a tb (2)
where So = initial displacement under the sustained load at t = 0, and a and b are constants (tuning factors). The
time to reach the displacement at the ultimate load of the In-24N and Ea-24N anchors was estimated at the free
and load ends. The time to reach the displacement at the ultimate load of the In-24N-0.34 and In-24N-0.50
anchors was estimated to be 64 years and 15 years at the free end, respectively. Meanwhile, the time of the In-
24N-0.34 and In-24N-0.54 anchors was estimated to be more than 10,000 years at the load end. Consequently, a
remarkable difference was observed between the estimated values from the load and free ends. The time of the
Ea-24N-0.33 anchor was estimated to be 2400 years and 7300 years at the free and load ends, respectively. The
time of the Ea-24N-0.50 anchor was also estimated to be 5.7 years and 20 years at the free and load ends,
respectively. The estimated value from the free end was smaller than that from the load end. A remarkable
difference between the estimated values from the load and free ends was observed in the specimen with a small
amount of creep deformation. Two reasons were provided for this finding. The displacement of the load end
contained both creep deformation and rebar extension. The first reason was the difference in the amount of the
rebar extension between the ultimate and creep test loads. The second reason was the function of the estimate
formula used, which was an exponential function. Applying the exponential function for the inorganic-type
anchor with a small amount of creep deformation was thought to increase the error.
Table 5 and Fig. 6 present the relationships between the stress level and the difference of the displacement
from 1 to 90 days. The variation in the displacement for the organic-type anchors became quite larger at a stress
level of approximately more than 0.50. The displacement of the inorganic-type anchor became larger at a stress
level of ~0.60.7. Assuming that the creep limits of the post-installed anchors were represented by the inflection
points of the displacement curves in Fig. 6, the creep limit of the inorganic type was ~0.60.7, whereas that of
the organic type was ~0.50. The compressive concrete creep failure was known to occur at a stress level larger
than 0.70, which was consistent with these results. The creep limit of the inorganic-type anchor was likely higher
than that of the organic type.
7
16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017
Santiago Chile, January 9th to 13th 2017
8
16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017
Santiago Chile, January 9th to 13th 2017
Table 5 Relationships between the stress level and the variation in displacement
Displacement of the free end
Symbol Type of anchor (mm)
1 day 90 days Dif.*1
In-30N-0.30 0.052 0.052 0.000
In-30N-0.45 Inorganic 0.080 0.084 0.004
In-30N-0.59 0.174 0.232 0.058
Ep-30N-0.48 0.154 0.290 0.136
Ep-30N-0.54 Epoxy 0.446 1.058 0.612
Ep-30N-0.59 3.034 - -
In-24N-0.34 0.062 0.100 0.038
In-24N-0.50 0.082 0.166 0.084
In-24N-0.68 Inorganic 0.196 0.450 0.254
2
In-24N-0.72 0.490 (1.793)* (1.303)*2
Ea-24N-0.33 0.164 0.272 0.108
Ea-24N-0.50 0.382 0.618 0.236
Ea-24N-0.57 Epoxy acrylate 0.426 1.066 0.640
Ea-24N-0.65 - - -
Ea-24N-0.72 - - -
*1: difference of the displacement between 1 and 90 days
*2: estimated value from Eq. (2)
4. Conclusions
The creep deformation of the inorganic- and organic-type post-installed bonded anchors was examined. The
influences of the sustained load were also evaluated for the embedment length that was seven times the nominal
diameter.
The slope of the load displacement curve at the time of the bond strength test and the beginning of the creep
test was equivalent to about 1/3 of the ultimate load. The slope of the inorganic-type anchor was more than 1.5
9
16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017
Santiago Chile, January 9th to 13th 2017
times that of the organic type. The deformation by the load increased in several seconds for the creep test of the
organic type at high-stress level tests.
The displacement of the inorganic type at the free end at the creep failure was 1.13 mm, whereas that of the
organic type was about 3.5 mm. The displacements at the creep failure were about two times as large as that at
the ultimate load regardless of the anchor type.
The displacement variations from 1 to 90 days were examined to estimate the creep limits. The variation in
the displacement increased at a stress level of approximately more than 0.50. The displacement of the inorganic-
type anchor increased at a stress level of ~0.60.7. Assuming that the creep limits of the post-installed anchors
were represented by the inflection points of the displacement curves, the creep limit of the inorganic-type (In-
24N) was ~0.60.7, whereas that of the organic type (Ea-24N) was ~0.50.
5. References
[1] National Transportation Safety Board (2006). Highway accident report: ceiling collapse in the Interstate 90 Connector
Tunnel, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, July 10, 2006.
[2] Yano A, Suigaya S, and Matuszaki Y (1981). Study about capacity for the long term sustained tensile load part 8,
Architectural Institute of Japan, Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, pp. 15171518.
[3] Nakano K., Matsuzaki Y, and Sugiyama T (2011). Study on the long-term allowable stress for post-installed anchor part
3 experiment on tensile creep deformation, Architectural Institute of Japan, Summaries of Technical Papers of
Annual Meeting, The Conformation IV, pp. 639640.
[4] Elighausen R, Mallee R, and Silva JF (2006). Anchorage in Concrete Construction. A Wiley Company.
[5] European Organisation for Technical Approvals (2008). ETAG 001, Part Five, Bonded Anchors, p. 25.
10