Frustrated by impaired vision and wet shooting optics, STEVE MCDOWELL takes the plunge and opts for corrective laser eye surgery
I WRITE this with apologies to the excellent offices Satisfied shooter:
of JH Steward (Bisley) – the opticians in whose very spec-free Steve. Picture capable hands my shooting eyes have been for courtesy of James Mehta some years. But not any more. The short sightedness and the astigmatism that afflicted my vision have gone – eliminated by laser eye surgery. I’ve always had a hate/hate relationship with contact lenses. Ever since giving up cricket a couple of years ago – due to encroaching age and back problems – I’ve worn them only very occasionally. As such I was never very experienced, and never got used to plunging my finger into my eye, in the bleary mornings. Besides, firing prone means looking out of the very top of your eye and I found sometimes the lenses would get moved down while in the aim every time I blinked. Though I had been toying with the idea of corrective surgery for some time, it was this year’s Imperial Meeting that made me do it. Or rather, it was the weather at the Imperial Meeting that made me do it: rainstorms of biblical proportions ham- mered the event from day one. The first shoot – the Admiral Hutton – was cancelled for the first time in London Vision Clinic, just off Harley Street. For three Before: Steve anyone’s memory. hours my eyes were tested in every conceivable way with his pre- After being rained on for a fifth successive day, I by every conceivable machine. I met three experts, op. shooting optics. Picture lay face-down on the 1,000yd firing point adjusting who guided me through the process. Hallelujah: I was courtesy of my shooting glasses. My waterproofs were all over suitable for the LASIK surgery, the less invasive and James Mehta the place; water was dripping down my neck; the easier-to-recover-from of the two available forms. wind was blowing rain into my shooting box; and In an age where corrective laser eye surgery has my glasses steamed up (again) as I tried to wipe the reached the high street for less than the price of an More than one surgeon, however, had turned rain off them (again) with a cloth which was wetter exotic holiday, this treatment cost £4,200. Professor Jasmine, the young woman in front of me, away, at than the lens itself. In the end I just took them off, and Dan Rienstein, the American-born surgeon who runs -12 in each eye. threw them in a huff into my shooting box. the clinic, is proud of the price tag. “Would you buy a The procedure itself isn’t like any surgery you Conniving with the kind shooter to my right, discount parachute?” he asks. “These are your eyes might imagine. A completely sterile environment who agreed to spot for me, I could still barely see if we’re talking about.” isn’t necessary, because there is almost no invasion. the target, half-obscured by low cloud by the look of Rienstein’s qualifications are too long to list, but A small flap is cut in the cornea, and the laser, which it, was up or down. I locked my position rigidly, and most of those who are turned away by mainstream appears simply as a flashing light, is programmed to gripped my Gemini so I could be sure I was pointing clinics are accepted and successfully treated by vaporise a tiny slither before the flap is replaced. It at target 23. I could not even see the colours of the the London Vision Clinic. He even tackles referrals takes 10 minutes, and heals in a few hours. target boards, never mind the numbers. from the capital’s famous Moorefields Eye Hospital. I have endured much more unpleasant fillings. In the end, it was something of a miracle that Age; severity of vision defects; and even underlying Within moments I was sitting up, cheerfully reading the shoppers of Guildford were not endangered. But I disorders like diabetes, which other clinics will refuse the eye-card better than I had been ten minutes got through, not only without a miss, but with a 45.2 to treat, are usually embraced by Rienstein. “You before. There was some redness and soreness over- – and only one magpie. manage the condition at the same time. Where’s the night, and I was given a large collection of eye drops Pretty good, I thought. But it was time, finally, problem?” he offers. – antibiotic and moisturising – to use several times a to bite the bullet. My vision was not that bad: an easily manage- day for a week. But within a day or two my eyesight able -1.75 dioptres in each eye (bad enough to fail a was extraordinary. Less invasive driving test), plus the astigmatism that, uncorrected, I can now stand in my first-floor office and read And so it was I found myself, before an array of made the target appear almond-shaped through the number plates of the cars zooming by. I can see incredible machinery, in the stylishly appointed my sights. clearly and absolutely: it’s magic. No more specs.
Indeed, a month later I was re-tested and my eyesight,
Professor Dan at 20/12.5, is 40% better than 20/20 – which is Rienstein in enough to be a fighter pilot, never mind a motorist. action The clinic claims the vast majority of its short-sighted clients end up with better than 20/20 vision. Young Jasmine, meanwhile, was so delighted with the results she looked like she had just been released from solitary confinement. Her mum shed tears of joy. There was only one thing left for me: another trip to Bisley.
I can see clearly now
I entered a long-range competition. The format was two sighters and 10 to count at 900yd and 1,000yd. The first time I gazeed into the rear sight I found I could close down the aperture even further. The foresight looked as clear as a lighthouse, and I could even read the target number through the foresight. Blimey! I shot badly (91.6ex-100.10), but that’s largely because of the excitement and the fact that my 0.3-dioptre Eagle Eye was knocked about by the muzzle blast. I know: take it off. No problem: I can see like an eagle with a microscope. I talk to GB shooter Belinda Moore. An infinitely better shot than me, she reveals that with eyesight three times worse than me she went through a similar procedure just before the Meeting. I am disappointed: I’ll never catch her now. “I’m bionic,” she says, “but I didn’t win any- thing.” Then she makes the point that might, just might, prove interesting: “Are we cheating?”