Sunteți pe pagina 1din 6

[

Vol. 28, No. 5, 604/609 (1992)]

Minimum Fuel Cruise of Aircraft by Periodic Control

Seiya UENO*

The long-range aircraft cruise problem is very important for airlines which desire to minimize fuel
consumption. Many papers have been appeared including the case which the criteria involve cruising
time. Most of them, however, solve the problems under condition of a steady-state flight. In other word,
they optimize the constrained problem. In the present operation, the altitude and velocity are chosen the
optimal ones that are derived from the solution of a minimum fuel problem for a steady-state level flight.
This solution satisfies the neccessary conditions of optimality. However, it is shown that the steady
cruise is non-convex. The non optimality of a steady cruise is also reported, and the optimal solutions
are solved using a periodic control that repeats the same sequence of unsteady controls and trajectories.
In this paper, the long range minimum fuel problem is solved numerically under the assumption that
the optimal thrust control becomes a bang-bang type. The aircraft weight change during one period is
ignored. Under the boundary condition that the initial states are the same as the terminal ones, the
optimal problem is solved. The equations of motion for an aircraft is the point-mass model, the
atomospheric density is a funcion of the altitude.
It is shown that the optimal arc consists of two quasi-steady subarcs. It is also shown that the same
subarcs are derived by using a reduced order model. The optimal controls for this model become the
chattering type. The control and state variables of this solution are characteristic of the unsteady
optimal cruise.

Key Words: optimal control, periodic control, chattering, aircraft cruise

,
1.
1 , 2
.
, , ,


1)4). , 5)9).
,
, , ,
. 10)12).

, ,
. ,
. , ,
.
7 (199011)
156 ,
* Faculty of Engineering, Yokohama National Univer-
.
sity, Yokohama

(Received July 22, 1991)
(Revised October 2, 1991) , 16). ,

TR 0005/92/2805-0604 (C) 1991 SICE


: 605


. , ,

.
,

, ,
.
,

. ,
Fig. 2 Drag coefficient as a function of Mach number
, 0
,
Table 1 Data of an aircraft used in analysis
,
. , ,
.

2.
. k ,
,
k=6 3).
Fig. 1 , 13).
.
M=CT-SwM2(CD0+C2L)-sin (1a)
Table 1 .
=(SwM2CL-cos)/M (1b)

h=Msin (1c)
.
x=Mcos (1d)
,
M, ,
. (t=0) (t=TF)
h ( ) x . ,
() .
.
CL
M(0)=M(TF) (5a)
CT .
(0)=(TF) (5b)
.
h(0)=h(TF) (5c)
CTminCTCTmax (2)
x(0)=0, x(TF)=XF (5d)
Sw, CD0, ,
,
Sw , . ,
CD0 .
, .
Sw=Sw exp(-h) (3)
.
CD0=CD0(1+Mk) (4)
J=1/XFTF0CTdt (6)
Sw

, CD0Fig. 2 1 ,
.

3.

, ,
. ,
,
.
, . ,


Fig. 1 Variables in vertical motion .
606 19925 28 5

= ------)
Mssk 2
k-1/k+7<< (10)

2 1/k 7'ss=0
, ,
hss=-1
Q
In Swss(M-1)Zkk 2 CDo
K
.
(CT)Ss= K CDOSS, (CL)ss= CDOSSK (7)
4.
2 -test ,

12). ,
, L , f . ,
, . 1
()=GT(-j)PG(j)+QTG(j) . , ,
+GT(-j)Q+R ,
G(s)=(sI-A)-1B, H=L+Tf 2
A=f/, B=f/ . ,
P=2H/2, Q=2H/, R=2H/2 (8) boost-arc,
adjoint , coast-arc .
, . , z*z<0

z , ,

(8) , ,

. () (1, 1) .

11=(){(14+2k)(2/)3-(12+4k)(2/)2
-(2-2k)(2/)} (9)

() .
Fig. 3 Transformation of a time axis
, (9) .

-XF=16
--- XF=8

--- XF=4

(a) Mach number (c) Lift coefficient

(b) Flight path angle (d) Trajectory


Fig. 4 Optimal trajectories by periodic control
(terminal ranges are specified 4, 8, and 16)
: 607

, 14) 15) , =1 , (1) .


. , =0 ,
, . , 0
. (5) , outer . (14a), (14b) CL

16). , 2 (E, x), 2 (CT,


=t/Tc (0tTc) (11a) M) , .
=(TF-t)/(TF-Tc) (TctTF) (11b) E=M(CT-SWM2CD0-/(SWM2))
, Tc x=M (15)

. , . (13) ,
CT=CTmax (0tTc) (12a) .
CT=CTmin (TctTF) (12b)
(11) Fig. 3 , . , -test .
. =0 , (5) ,

, =1 .
. , Tc TF ()=-1/M2<0 (16)
. , ,

, Fig. 4 . , ,
XF=4, 8, 16 . , .
40, 80, 160km ,
. Fig. 4(a)(c) .

. Fig. 4 (a) (), Fig. 4 (b) 3


, Fig. 4 (c) . , Fig. 5 .

t/TF=0.75 . XF=16 , ,
, .
. Fig. 5 (a) , Fig. 5 (b) , Fig. 5 (c)
. . .
. CL=1/SWM2 (17)
Fig. 4 (d) M, ,CL , ,
. , .
XF=8 .
(1) . , ,
.
.
5.

, . , boost-arc coast-arc
. , . . Table
E=h+M2/2 (13) 1 , ,
Table 2 . B boost-arc, C
. coast-arc . Fig. 5 (d)
. , . ,
, (13) , . , B C
. .
E=M(CT-SWM2(CD0+C2L)) (14a) ,
=(SWM2CL-cos)/M (14b) .
h=Msin (14c)
x=Mcos (14d) .
608 19925 28 5

-APPROX

--- EXACT

(a) Mach number (c) Lift coefficient

(b) Trajectory (d) Mach number vs height


Fig. 5 Approximate and chattering solutions
(terminal range is specified 16)

Table 2 Chattering solution of a reduced order model



1) R. L. Schultz and N. R. Zagalsky: Aircraft Perfor-
mance Optimization, J. of Aircraft, 9-2, 108/114 (1972)
2) H. Erzberger and H. Lee: Constrained Optimum Tra-
jectories with Specified Range, J. of Guidance and
Control, 3-1, 78/85 (1980)
6. 3) E. Large: Minimum Fuel Paths for a Subsonic Air-
craft, J. of Aircraft, 18-5, 410/414 (1981)
4) J. W. Burrows: Fuel-Optimal Aircraft Trajectories
with Fixed Arrival Times, J. of Guidance, Control, and
.
Dynamics, 6-1, 14/19 (1983)
, . 5) J. L. Speyer: On the Fuel Optimality of Cruise, J. of
Aircraft, 10-12, 763/765 (1973)
, ,
6) J. L. Speyer: Nonoptimality of the Steady State Cruise
. , for Aircraft, AIAA J., 14-11, 1604/1610 (1976)
, 7) E. G. Gilbert: Vehicle Cruise: Improved Fuel Econo-
my by Periodic Control, Automatica, 12-3, 159/166
. (1976)
, 8) W. Grimm, K. H. Well and H. J. Oberle: Periodic
. Control for Minimum-Fuel Aircraft Trajectories, J. of
Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 9-2, 169/174 (1986)
. , 9) P. K. A. Menon: Study of Aircraft Cruise, J. of Guid-
, ance, Control, and Dynamics, 12-5, 631/639 (1989)
10) : ,
. 509/510, (1983)
, 11) G. Guardabassi, A. Locatelli and S. Rinaldi: Status of
Periodic Optimization of Dynamical Systems, J. of

Optimization Theory and Applications, 14-1, 1/20
. (1974)
: 609

12) S. Bittanti, G. Fronza and G. Guardabassi: Periodic 16) : ,


Control: A Frequency Domain Approach, IEEE , 37-429, 502/506 (1989)
Trans. Automatic Control, AC-18-1, 33/38 (1973)
13) S. Uehara, H. J. Stewart and L. J. Wood: Minimum-
Time Loop Maneuvers of Jet Aircraft, J. of Aircraft,
15-8, 449/455 (1978) [ ]
14) A. K. Wu and A. Miele: Sequential Conjugate Gradi-
ent-Restoration Algorithm for Optimal Control Prob- ( )
lems with Non-Differential Constraints and General
1985, (
Boundary Conditions, Part 1, J. Optimal Control
) . , (). 1988,
Application Methods, 1-1, 69/88 (1980)
. 1990
15) S. Gonzalez and S. Rodriguez: Modified Quasilinear-
ization Algorithm for Optimal Control Problems with .
Nondifferential Constraints and General Boundary ,
Conditions, J. Optimization Theory and Applications, . (
50, 109/128 (1986) ).

S-ar putea să vă placă și