Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
html
Introduction
The analysis in this article offers a clear picture of the interaction of legal and economic factors
in FDI policy, and the international investment regime, focusing on BITs and the emerging
concept to establish multilateral rules governing international investment in the form of a MAI.
Within these episodes of evolution and development ASEAN countries have gone through the
process of FDI policy changes and legal adjustments to accommodate the changing global legal
and economic environment. The pace of investment liberalisation taken by these countries was
clearly influenced and affected by the interaction of legal and economic factors in the
international sphere, and by a combination of their economic relations outside the region and
their own economic policies.
In this article I will focus on analysing ASEAN countries' investment regimes i.e. national
investment laws, BITs, and regional investment agreement based on the theoretical background
analysed in the previous section. This will show how national laws of the ASEAN countries
actually further the process of open regionalism, or how they need to adjust their laws and
policies in order to facilitate the achievement of such aims. I will firstly discuss the ASEAN
countries' national investment laws followed by the analysis of the actual ASEAN BITs entered
into with the European countries and the US, the main home countries of inflow investment to
the region, and compare them with the ASEAN regional investment agreement. The comparison
among the ASEAN BITs, and also with ASEAN regional investment agreement emphasises the
nature of the BITs as a lex specialis that allows flexibility of ASEAN countries in liberalising
investment. However, as mentioned in earlier, the feasibility of a MAI prompts ASEAN
countries to adjust their laws and policy to comply with its standard if ASEAN countries would
accept a MAI that would establish a new and higher multinational standard of investment
liberalisation and protection. This might be seen as an instrument accelerating the process of an
open regionalism.
Since the 1980s ASEAN countries have embarked on significant reforms of their investment
regimes. These investment liberalisation initiatives were undertaken unilaterally(2). They have
occurred due to the recognition of the benefits of a degree of liberalisation and competition in
response to change in the international climate, rather than due to the requirements of regional or
international agreements. However, by 1995 ASEAN countries were conforming to the
Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs) to eliminate trade-related
performance requirements. Controls of FDI in ASEAN countries, however, remained quite
extensive and complex(3). The policy instruments include the following:
In addition, there are many other policies that influence FDI such as tariff and other trade
barriers, the lack of competition rules and policy, and the degree and type of protection of
intellectual property rights.
Table 1 summarises the regulations of FDI in ASEAN countries and shows the main
characteristics of investment regulations of these countries, on which the analysis of ASEAN
national investment laws is based.
Table 1
Part 2
_______________________________________________________________
(*) Assistant Professor, Dr., School of Law, STOU. She holds LL.B and LL.M. (Thammasat
University, Thailand), LL.M. (Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium), and Ph.D. (Lancaster
University, UK)
(1) The analysis in this chapter is by the author based on the compilation of ASEAN laws by
varoius sources i.e. CCH Asia, APEC, ESCAP and ASEAN Secreatariat. There is a paucity of
up-to-date secondary literature in this topic.
(2) All ASEAN countries gradually liberalise investment regulations step by step, aspect by
aspect, and sector by sector without entering into any agreement for each liberalisation at the
time. For instance, Indonesia launched various liberalisation packages: the January package of
1984: tax reform; the April package of 1985: shipping and customs reform; the May package of
1986: import and investment reform; the October package of 1986: sole importer and duty
reform; the December package of 1987: opened up the tourism sector to foreign investors and
relaxing the extension of divestment programme and relaxed the equity share of foreign investors
in joint venture companies which export at least 65% of their production; the October and
December package of 1988 : banking, capital markets, import and export reforms; the policy of
May 1989: re-issued negative list which more open; the May of 1990: simplification of licensing
and permit procedures; the June package of 1991: trade and investment reform; the July package
of 1992: investment, trade, financial and manpower reform; the May package of 1993: banking
reform; the June package of 1993: trade, industry and investment reform; the October package of
1993: trade, investment and environment; and the June package of 1994: simplification of the
license and permit procedures.
(3) The analysis in this section is based on national investment laws of ASEAN countries,
country study on investment regime of APEC member economies, and a study of the relevant
national laws, also a study compiled in Doing Business in Asia. Published by CCH Asia Limited.
The individual ASEAN country's laws in this loose-leaf are provided by (a) Indonesia: William
A. Sullivan; (b) Malaysia: Yoong Nim Chor; (c) The Philippines: Sycip Salazar Hernandez &
Gatmaitan; (d) Singapore: Drew & Napier; (e) Thailand: Baker & Mckenzie (Thailand)