Advertised Documents - DA0282.2017 PDF

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
advertised: 28/06/2017
Planning Administration
This document is subject to copyright and is protected by law. In displaying this
N
document on its website the Council grants website users a non-exclusive licence to
reproduce the document in their web browser for the sole purpose of viewing the
content. The Council reserves all other rights. Documents displayed on the Council's
website are intended for public perusal only and should not be reproduced
without the consent of the copyright owner.
STR EET
LIN DSAY
SW
SW
SW
SW
TING
SPS SW
EXIS
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
R
IVE
SW
KR
SW
SW
SW
ES
SW
SW
H
RT
SW
SW 0 10 20 30m
NO
SW SCALE 1:1000 AT ORIGINAL SIZE
SW
PRELIMINARY
B FOR APPROVAL
SW SW
SW
SW
A INITIAL ISSUE
rev description app'd date
SW
SW City of Launceston
SW Northbank Development
Stormwater Drainage
SW
Layout Plan
LEGEND:
TA
M AR
SW
SW PROPOSED SURFACE 11/F Alphaland Southgate Tower 2258 Chino Roces Ave corner EDSA
RI
WATER PIPEWORK Makati City 1232 Philippines

VE
T 63 2 479 5600 F 63 2 479 5601

R
E mnlmail@ghd.com W www.ghd.com
PROPOSED SURFACE
WATER OPEN DRAIN GHD Pty Ltd
Conditions of Use: This document may only be used by GHD's client (and any other
person who GHD has agreed can use this document) for the purpose for which it was
PROPOSED AMENITIES prepared and must not be used by any other person or for any other purpose.
OUTFALL PIPELINE
scale 1:1000 for A3 job no. 32-18399
CADASTRAL / PARCEL
date June 2017 rev no. B
PROPOSED PIT LOCATION
approved (PD) SK 010
GHD STANDARD A3 SHEET CAD File No.: GHD_G_1022 Updated: 08-07-03 Version: 1.1
Plot Date: 15 June 2017 - 1:36 PM Plotted by: Robert Casaclang Jr Cad File No: G:\32\18399\CADD\Drawings\32-18399-SK010.dwg
Document Set ID: 3555021
Version: 1, Version Date: 20/06/2017
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
North Bank Precinct Site Works

Development Application
City of Launceston
June 2017
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Contents
1. Introduction 4
1.1 Purpose of the Report 4
1.2 Statutory References 4
1.2.1 Name of Planning Instrument 4
1.2.2 Name of Planning Authority 4
1.3 Description of Proposed Development 4
1.3.1 Limitation of proposed development 5
2. Subject Site 6
2.1 The Subject Land 6
2.2 Title Information 9
2.3 Description of Area 9
2.4 Servicing 9
2.5 Access and Road Network 10
2.6 Site Contamination 10
3. Background to the Proposed Development 11
4. Development Application Assessment 13

4.1 Zoning 13
4.2 Use Categorisation 13
4.3 Approval Status 14
4.4 Open Space Zone Provisions 14
4.4.1 Zone Purpose 14
4.5 Bushfire Prone Area Code E1.0 16
4.6 Potentially Contaminated Land Code E2.0 17
4.7 Landslide Code E3.0 20
4.8 Road and Railway Asset Code E4.0 20
4.9 Flood Prone Areas Code E5.0 20
4.10 Parking and Sustainable Transport Code 21
4.11 Scenic Management Code E7.0 21
4.12 Biodiversity Code E8.0 21
4.13 Water Quality Code E9.0 21
4.14 Recreation and Open Space Code E10.0 28
4.15 Environmental Impacts and Attenuation Code E11.0 28
4.16 Airports Impact Management Code E12.0 28
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
4.17 Local Historic Heritage Code E13.0 28

4.18 Coastal Code E14.0 28
4.19 Telecommunications Code E15.0 28
4.20 Invermay/Inveresk Flood Inundation Area Code E16.0 28
4.21 Cataract Gorge Management Area Code E17.0 33
4.22 Signs Code E18.0 33
4.23 Development Plan Code E19.0 33
5. Conclusion 34
Appendices
A Stormwater Drainage Layout Plan
B Electrical Reticulation Layout Plan
C Levee Modification Plans
D Title Documentation
E Letter of Consent
F Conceptual Landscape Plan
G Environmental Site Assessment
H Construction and Environmental Management Plan
I Stormwater Infrastructure Plan

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the Report

Commercial Project Delivery (CPD) have been engaged on behalf of City of Launceston Major Projects
Department, to prepare and lodge an application to undertake site works for the purposes of installing
underground services within the North Bank precinct development site.
This report forms the basis of the application and has been prepared taking into account the
provisions of the Launceston Interim Planning Scheme 2015.
Enquiries relating to this request can be directed to:
Chloe Lyne
Planning and Development Consultant
Commercial Project Delivery
1/47A Brisbane St
Launceston TAS 7250
0408 397 393
1.2 Statutory References
1.2.1 Name of Planning Instrument

The subject of the proposed amendment is the Launceston Interim Planning Scheme 2015 (hence
forth referred to as the interim planning scheme).
1.2.2 Name of Planning Authority

The Planning Authority is the Launceston City Council (Council)
1.3 Description of Proposed Development

It is proposed to undertake site works which will facilitate the provision of underground services within
the North Bank precinct in addition to modifications to the redundant flood levee. The site works will
involve digging trenches to a nominal depth of between 600mm and 700mm for the installation of
underground stormwater pipes and electrical cabling whereas the levee modification will involve
shaving the top of the levee crest.
Stormwater drainage layout

Approximately 800m of trenches will be dug for the provision of underground stormwater piping with
an additional 140m of above surface channelling to be incorporated into the overall stormwater
network. Two primary trenches will be dug for the installation of stormwater piping with one running
parallel with Lindsay Street for a length of approximately 190m and the other running perpendicular to
Lindsay Street for a length of approximately 165m. The perpendicular pipeline will have a number of
4
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
smaller pipelines branching off in easterly and westerly directions through the body of the pipeline.
The stormwater network has been designed to capture and drain surface water runoff from the various
recreational and open space areas of future development sites associated with the North Bank precinct
which include playground and BBQ areas.
The proposed stormwater network will tap into the existing stormwater main which dissects the
subject site in a north-south direction connecting into an existing penstock which is located along the
southern perimeter of the subject site and discharges into the Tamar Estuary. A stormwater drainage
layout plan is attached as Appendix A.
Electrical cabling layout

Approximately 485m of underground electrical cabling will be located throughout the subject site
which will supply power to future amenities and BBQ shelters within the North Bank precinct in
addition to external lighting of the precinct. The electrical works will involve bringing power to an
above ground pole within the subject site via existing TasNetworks poles located within the Lindsay
Street road casement before installing the electrical cable underground. The underground electrical
cabling will be serviced by various switchboards and pits which will be installed along the network.
The electrical cabling will be predominately located within the same area as the branched stormwater
line which will run perpendicular to Lindsay Street. Additional works will be located to the north of the
North Esk Rowing Club and office building which largely involves the reconfiguration of the current
electrical infrastructure from above ground to underground. An electrical reticulation layout plan is
attached as Appendix B.
Levee modification
It is proposed to modify the levee between the St Patricks College rowing shed to the east and the
stormwater penstock to the west. The purpose of the levee modifications is to lower the crest in order
to achieve the required gradient to connect into the north bank abutment of the pedestrian bridge
which has be proposed as part of development application DA0210/2017. The area of works will occur
at the crest of the levee for a distance of approximately 220m with the depth of the excavation varying
from 0.134m to 0.982m. All the material that will be cut from the levee will be reused within the
subject site as fill. The layout, sections and levels of the levee works are attached in Appendix C.
1.3.1 Limitation of proposed development

The proposed development subject to this application is limited to the site works and installation of
infrastructure and services that has been described within section 1.3 and detailed within the
respective plans attached within Appendix A and B. No other works or development associated with
the North Bank precinct are proposed at this stage.
5
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
2. Subject Site
2.1 The Subject Land

The subject site is located on the southern side of the Lindsay Street at the confluence of the North Esk
River and the Tamar Estuary and encompasses several land titles which are described within section 2.2
covering an area of approximately 6.1ha (refer to Figure 1). However, the proposed site works will be
isolated to a smaller area within the vicinity of the Taroona Street road casement with the majority of
site works to be undertaken on land addressed as 79 Lindsay Street and 61 Lindsay Street.
Figure 1 - Aerial view of the subject site indicated by the red transparent layer.
The land encapsulated within the title addressed as 79 Lindsay Street is largely vacant comprising the
flood levee along the perimeter of the Tamar and North Esk rivers and includes a walking track atop
the levee, in addition to a portion of the Boral storage yard located on the eastern side of Taroona
Street (refer to Photo 1 and 2).
6
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Photo 1 Partial view of 79 Lindsay Street looking south with a portion of the Boral facility
within the middle ground.
Photo 2 Partial view of 79 Lindsay Street looking south-west over the vacant portion of the
land.
The land encapsulated within the title addressed as 61 Lindsay Street is the site of Boral concrete
batching plant which comprises the site office, materials and equipment storage area and the concrete
batching plant (refer to Photo 3).
7
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Photo 3 Partial view of 61 Lindsay Street showing the location of the concrete batching plant.
The subject site is zoned Open Space in accordance with the interim planning scheme and adjoins the
Environmental Management zone which encapsulates the water bodies and riparian zones of the
Tamar and North Esk rivers in addition to the Particular Purpose Zone 9 - North Bank Silos (refer to
Figure 2). In this instance, all site works will occur within the land zoned Open Space. Overall, the land
subject to the site works is relatively flat being located within a sunken bowl which is bounded by the
flood levee banks.
Figure 2- Zoning Plan
8
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
2.2 Title Information

The proposed development application relates to the following titles:
Address Owner(s) Title Reference
61 Lindsay Street, Invermay City of Launceston 198362/1
50795/4
81-83 Lindsay Street, Invermay City of Launceston 101627/1
50795/3
3 Taroona Street, Invermay City of Launceston 133205/2
Not listed City of Launceston 84271/1
Not listed City of Launceston 252170/1
Not Listed City of Launceston 127765/2
Taroona Street road reserve City of Launceston No Title Reference
Copies of relevant certificate of titles are contained at Appendix D.
It is noted that all titles that are encapsulated within the subject site are under the ownership of City of
Launceston. Accordingly, pursuant to section 52(1B) of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993
the development application form has been signed by a representative of the General Manager and a
letter authorising the lodgement of the development application from a representative of the General
Manager has been provided. A copy of the letter is contained within Appendix F.
2.3 Description of Area

The North Bank precinct is in close proximity and within walking distance (500 metres) from the
Launceston Central Business District (CBD) and the Seaport which is located on the opposite side of
the river bank and is developed with a range of marina facilities, a hotel, restaurants and cafes and
residential uses. The subject site adjoins the Silos Hotel site to the north-west which is currently under
construction with Office Works and Bunnings retail precinct located to the north beyond Lindsay
Street. The North Bank Precinct has been compulsorily acquired as part of the levee development.
Boral Concrete still operate from the eastern portion of the site.
2.4 Servicing
The subject site is located within a serviced district and is capable of connecting to full reticulated
services.
9
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
2.5 Access and Road Network

Access to the subject site is provided from an existing junction between Lindsay Street and Taroona
Street.
2.6 Site Contamination

The land located at 61 Lindsay Street is identified as being potentially contaminated due to the
presence of the concrete batching plant use. Accordingly, the Potentially Contaminated Lands Code
(the code) applies to the proposed development. An Environmental Site Assessment for the
installation of the underground services has been prepared for the application which provides a history
of the land uses that have occurred at the site, an assessment of the potentially contaminating
activities, investigation of site contamination in addition to addressing the requirements of the code.
10
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
3. Background to the Proposed Development
The North Bank precinct development project stems from the draft North Bank Masterplan Vision
which was undertaken in 2013 and sought to develop a plan for the area which incorporated mixed
land uses, unique built form and recreational opportunities. A key driver of the masterplan was to
expand and enhance the existing open space network along the northern riverfront and to improve
connectivity and cohesiveness between open space areas and established activity centres which was
incorporated into the primary objectives of the masterplan:
1. Facilitate enhanced access to the river edge and improve natural values and visual amenity o
the area;
2. Deliver an expansion of the established walking and cycling trails, and facilitate enhanced
connectivity along the public open space network;
3. Invest in infrastructure to support community based events and passive recreation activities;
and
4. Provide a framework to identify and inform specific opportunities for both public and private
sector investment and to maximise the synergies between these development opportunities;
The site works proposed within this development application form part of the broader North Bank
precinct development project. Specifically, the subject site will be the location of the primary public
park and recreation space that will be adjacent to the Tamar and North Esk Rivers which was identified
as a priority open space and passive recreation area within the masterplan (refer to Figure 3). The site
excavation works are being applied for separately to the main passive recreation precinct to allow site
preparation works to begin and ensure the overall project can be completed in accordance with the
timing required by the funding deed. A separate application will be made for the facilities and
amenities associated with the North Bank Precinct recreation development.
11
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Figure 3 extract of the draft North Bank Masterplan 2013 indicating the overall vision of the
precinct including the portion of land that is subject to this application.
12
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
4. Development Application Assessment
4.1 Zoning
As described in section 2.1, the subject site is situated in the Open Space Zone.
4.2 Use Categorisation

Pursuant to clause 8.2.1 of the interim planning scheme, all proposed use and development must be
categorised into one of the use classes listed within Table 8.2 of the scheme. Furthermore, clause 8.2.2
specifies that a use or development that is directly associated with and a subservient part of another
use on the same site must be categorised into the same use class as that other use.
For the purposes of this application, and in accordance with clause 8.2.1, the proposed site works have
been categorised as Passive Recreation which is defined as follows in Table 8.2 of the interim
planning scheme:
use of land for informal leisure and recreation activities principally conducted in the open. Examples
include public parks, gardens and playgrounds, foreshore and riparian reserve.
The Passive Recreation use class is considered appropriate for the proposed development on the
basis that the levee modification, stormwater drainage and bulk of the electrical cabling will directly
facilitate the overarching open space and recreation areas by the following means:
1. providing reticulated power to BBQ shelters and external lighting facilities throughout the
recreation area; and
2. providing surface water drainage for the designated hard and soft stand playground,
recreation and events areas;
3. modifying the existing walkway which is located on top of the levee which will facilitate access
to the pedestrian footbridge proposed between North Bank and the Seaport in addition to the
broader North Bank recreation area.
In addition to the stormwater drainage and electrical cabling layout plans, a copy of the conceptual
landscape plan relating to the subject site is provided within Appendix F.
It is noted that a portion of the site works required for the underground electrical cabling will be
associated with the established North Esk Rowing club. The works will involve decommissioning and
removing the existing overhead powerlines for the provision of underground electrical supply to the
existing buildings. As such, all works involved with this aspect is considered to be exempt from
requiring a planning permit pursuant to clause 5.4 (a) of the Scheme.
Accordingly, all development that is assessed against the Scheme relates to the Passive Recreation
use class.
13
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
4.3 Approval Status

Passive Recreation is identified as a no permit required use class in the Open Space Zone. However,
the application is assessed as discretionary as it does not comply with the acceptable solutions
identified below. It relies on assessment against the associated Performance Criteria:
Open Space Zone:

19.4.2 Landscaping (P1)
Potentially Contaminated Land Code:

E2.5.1 Use Standards (P1)
E2.6.2 Excavation (P1)
Water Quality Code:

E9.6.1 Development in the vicinity of watercourses and wetlands (P1)
E9.6.2 Development of watercourses and wetland (P2)
4.4 Open Space Zone Provisions
4.4.1 Zone Purpose

19.1 Zone Purpose
23.1.1 To provide land for open space purposes including for passive recreation and natural
or landscape amenity.
The proposed use and development of the site for the purposes of site works to enable future
development of the North Bank passive recreation precinct is entirely in accordance with the
zone intent as demonstrated by its use status as no permit required.
Use Standards
In accordance with Table 19.3, the Use Standards do not apply to Passive Recreation.
Development Standards
19.4.1 Building height, setback and siting
Objective
To ensure that building bulk, form and siting:
(a) Is compatible with the character of the surrounding area;
(b) Protects the amenity of adjoining lots and surrounding uses; and
(c) Respects the natural and landscape values of the site.
Acceptable Solution Performance Criteria

A1 P1
Building height must be no greater than 5m. Building height must be compatible with the
character of the surrounding area, and
14
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
protect the amenity of adjoining lots and

surrounding uses, having regard to:
(a) the topography of the site;
(b) height of buildings on the site,
adjoining lots and adjacent lots;
(c) the natural and landscape values of
the site;
(d) the bulk and form of existing and
proposed buildings;
(e) the allowable building heights;
(f) the apparent height when viewed from
roads and public spaces;
(g) sunlight to private open space and
windows of habitable rooms on
adjoining lots;
(h) the existing screening or the ability to
implement screening; and
(i) any overshadowing of adjacent lots or
public places.
A2 P2
Setback from all boundaries must be no less Buildings must be sited so that there is not
than 10m unreasonable loss of amenity to the
occupiers of adjacent lots having
regard to:
(a) the topography of the site;
(b) the size, shape and orientation of the
site;
(c) the natural and landscape values of
the site;
(d) the setbacks of surrounding buildings;
(e) the height, bulk and form of existing
and proposed buildings;
(f) the privacy to private open space and
adjoining lots;
(g) sunlight to private open space and
adjoining lots;
(h) the existing screening or the ability to
implement screening; and
(i) the character of the surrounding area.
15
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Not applicable
No buildings or structures are proposed.
19.4.2 Landscaping
Objective
To ensure that development is landscaped to retain the natural values of the site and contributes
to the broader landscape of the area.
A1 P1
If for no permit required uses. Development must be landscaped to respect
the natural values of the site and the
broader landscape of the area, having
regard to:
(a) location and height of retaining walls;
(b) the existing vegetation and its
retention to where it is feasible to do
so;
(c) the location of any proposed buildings,
driveways, car parking, storage areas,
signage and utility services;
(d) proposed height and type of fencing;
(e) the location of pedestrian movement
routes;
(f) maintenance of plantings, weed
management and soil and water
management; and
(g) the character of the surrounding area
as shown in a detailed landscaping plan
Complies with P1
It is observed that Passive Recreation is a no permit required use.
4.5 Bushfire Prone Area Code E1.0

Not applicable because the subject site is not located within a bushfire prone area.
16
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
4.6 Potentially Contaminated Land Code E2.0

The Code applies on the basis that excavation works greater than 0.5m2 will occur on land, and
adjacent to land, identified as being potentially contaminated, notably 61 Lindsay Street, Invermay
which is the location of the Boral concrete batching plant.
A copy of the Environmental Site Assessment undertaken for the North Bank abutment is included as
Appendix G.
Code Purpose
E2.1 a) ensure that use or development of potentially contaminated land does not
adversely impact on human health or the environment.
Overall, the ESA accompanying the application has determined that the main risk to human
health and the environment during the construction phase of the trench digging and installation
of infrastructure and services, in addition to future users of the subject site is considered to be
low. This conclusion is consistent with the purpose of the Code.
Use Standards
E2.5.1 Use Standards
Objective
To ensure that potentially contaminated land is suitable for the intended use.

A1 P1
The Director, or a person approved by the Land is suitable for the intended use, having
Director for the purpose of this Code: regard to:
(a) certifies that the land is suitable for the (a) an environmental site assessment that
intended use; or demonstrates there is no evidence the land is
contaminated; or
(b) approves a plan to manage contamination
and associated risk to human health or the (b) and environmental site assessment that
environment that will ensure the land is demonstrates that the level of contamination
suitable for the intended use. . does not present a risk to human health or the
environment; or
(c) a plan to manage contamination and

associated risk to human health or the
environment that includes:
(i) an environmental site assessment;
17
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
(ii) any specific remediation and protection

measures required to be implemented before
any use commences; and
(iii) a statement that the land is suitable for the
intended use.
Complies with P1
Trenching works
The ESA concluded that the level of contamination identified within the proposed excavation
trenches is not considered to present a risk to human health or the environment stating the
following:
The risk to construction workers during installation of underground services is

considered to be low;
The risk of exposure to future users of the proposed recreational area is considered to b
low, given the depth of the identified contamination and given that it is located where
the North Bank car park is proposed to be built (paved); and
The risk to ecological receptors potential affected by the contamination (site flora and
fauna) is considered to be low, given the proposed use of the area as a car park with
little vegetation of significance.
It is therefore submitted that the land encapsulated within the subject site is suitable for the
intended development and subsequent passive recreation use in accordance with performance
criteria P1(b).
E2.6.1 Subdivision not applicable
E2.6.2 Excavation
Objective
To ensure that works involving excavation of potentially contaminated land does not adversely
impact on human health or the environment.
A1 P1
No acceptable solution Excavation does not adversely impact on
health and the environment, having regard to:
18
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
(a) an environmental site assessment that

demonstrates there is no evidence the land is
contaminated; or
(b) an environmental site assessment that
demonstrates that the level of contamination
does not present a risk to human health or the
environment; or
(c) a plan to manage contamination and

associated risk to human health and the
environment that includes:
(i) an environmental site assessment;
(ii) any specific remediation and protection

measures required to be implemented before
excavation commences; and
(iii) a statement that the excavation does not

adversely impact on human health or the
environment.
Complies with P1
Trenching works
Overall, the ESA concludes that the level of contamination identified within the proposed
excavation trenches is not considered to present a risk to human health or the environment.
However, the ESA included the following recommendations based on the findings of the
investigation which will need to be adhered to during the construction phase of the proposed
development:
1. According to the Tasmanian EPA information Bulletin No.105, which classifies soil for
offsite disposal, the samples analysed for this investigation would classify the soil in
trenches as Level 1 Fill, with the exception of the soil at location SB1 (near the new
flood gate and the former railways) where the shallow sample (0-500mm) would be
classified as Level 2 Low Level Contaminated and the deeper sample (500-700mm)
would be classified as Level 3 Contaminated, based on the benzo(a)pyrene
concentrations;
2. It is preferable that all soils are placed back into the trenches after completion of works.
However, if off-site removal of the soil from around location SB1 was required, it would be
recommended that the stockpile is sampled and tested for leachable PAHs to confirm
classification level;
3. It is recommended that the Health and Safety Management for trench construction
includes protective measures to address the potential exposure of construction workers to
19
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
contaminated soil (including asbestos). The CEMP for the works should make allowance
for the management of soil for offsite disposal, if required.
It is therefore submitted that all proposed excavation will not adversely impact on human health
and the environment in accordance with performance criteria P1(b).
In addition to the ESA, a Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the
service trenching works has been prepared for the development application. The CEMP details
potential impacts that may occur from the site works and mitigation measures which will assist
with managing potential impacts. A copy of the CEMP is contained within Appendix H.
Levee modification works
The works required for the modification of the levee will involve excavating the crest of the bank
over varying depths. The surplus material will then be utilised as fill within the subject site for
the future works involved with the North Bank precinct. The levee bank is located on land
addressed as 79 Lindsay Street, Invermay which is identified within certificate of title 16988/1.
The land is identified as being potentially contaminated on the basis that it adjoins land which is
identified as being potentially contaminated (Boral site) pursuant to the definition listed within
clause E2.3.1.
However, it is submitted that the levee is not (potentially) contaminated for the following
reasons:
1. The flood levee is constructed from clean uncontaminated fill imported to the site
which is required by engineering specifications; and
2. The potentially contaminating activity (Boral site) is located between 2 and 3m below
the crest of the levee where the excavation will occur. Accordingly, contaminating
material would not be able to transfer to the section of the levee to be modified.
Therefore, the code is not considered applicable to the works involved with the levee
modification.
4.7 Landslide Code E3.0

Not applicable because the subject site is not mapped as or otherwise known to be subject to a
landslip hazard.
4.8 Road and Railway Asset Code E4.0

Not applicable the proposed works do not require a new vehicle crossing, junction or level crossing
or intensify an existing access nor involve a sensitive use within 50 metres of a rail network or Category
1 or 2 road.
4.9 Flood Prone Areas Code E5.0

Not applicable because the subject site is not mapped under the flood prone areas overlay.
20
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
4.10 Parking and Sustainable Transport Code

The code applies to all use and development. However, it is identified that Table E6.1 does not
prescribe parking requirements for the Passive Recreation use class. Furthermore, it is not considered
necessary to provide dedicated car parking spaces for the proposed development it is for the
excavation of trenches to facilitate the provision of infrastructure and services.
Accordingly, the code is not considered an applicable to the development application pursuant to
clause 7.5.2 (b) on the basis that the code deals with a matter that will not be affected by the proposed
development.
4.11 Scenic Management Code E7.0

Not applicable because the subject site is not mapped as being within a scenic management tourist
road corridor or local scenic management area.
4.12 Biodiversity Code E8.0

Not applicable because the subject site is not mapped as being within a priority habitat area nor is it
proposed to clear native vegetation.
4.13 Water Quality Code E9.0

The code applies to the development on the basis that a small portion of the trenching excavation for
the electrical cabling will be located within 30m of the North Esk River. The Draft CEMP (Appendix H)
provides some assistance in the assessment of the proposed footbridge against the code.
Code Purpose
E9.1 The purpose of this provision is to:

(a) manage adverse impacts on wetlands and watercourses.
E9.6.1 Development in the vicinity of watercourses and wetlands
To protect watercourses and wetlands from the effects of development and minimise the
potential for water quality degradation.
A1 P1 P1
No acceptable solution. Development must not unreasonably impact
the water quality of watercourses or
wetlands, having regard to:
(a) the topography of the site
21
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
(b) the potential for erosion
(c) the potential for siltation and

sedimentation
(d) the risk of flood
(e) the impact of the removal of vegetation on

hydrology
(f) the natural values of the vegetation and the

land
(g) the scale of the development
(h) the method of works, including

vegetation removal, and the machinery
used
(i) any measures to mitigate impacts
(j) any remediation measures proposed
(k) any soil and water management plan and
(l) the requirements of the Department of

Primary Industries, Parks, Water and
Environment Wetlands and Waterways Works
Manual.
Complies with P1
Trenching works
Referring to the CEMP (Appendix H), the following assessment is made against the relevant
matters under the Performance Criteria with respect to the proposed development:
a) the section of land that triggers assessment against the code is located on the northern
side of the levee bank that is located adjacent to the North Esk River bank. This area is
flat an is unaffected by topographical constraints;
22
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
b) the potential for erosion is extremely low given that the excavation will involve the
digging of a linear trench which will be filled and reinstated once the electrical cabling is
installed. Furthermore, the area of excavation will be approximately 25m from the bank
of the North Esk River and will be located the levee embankment;
c) the potential for silt and sedimentation to be transferred as a result of the excavation is
extremely low given the presence of the flood levee embankment that separates the
excavation site and the North Esk River. In addition, sediment and erosion mitigation
measures are detailed within the CEMP which will further negate silt and sediment
transfer;
d) the risk of flooding within the subject site has been substantially mitigated by the
installation of the flood levees. Notwithstanding, the subsequent services will be
located underground and will be unaffected by severe flood events with the exception
of being saturated through excess water;
e) no vegetation will be removed as a result of the excavation works, nor will the natural
hydrological processes of the North Esk (and Tamar) River be impeded, altered or
obstructed by the proposed excavation;
f) the area of excavation within 30m of the North Esk River does not contain significant
natural or vegetation values;
g) the extent and scale of the excavation within 30m of the North Esk River will be minimal;
h) as detailed within the CEMP, the trenches will be excavated using a small excavator with
material to be placed beside the trench for reinstatement following the laying of
electrical cables. This method is considered reasonable for the proposed development;
i) mitigation measures have been recommended within the CEMP where potential impacts
and/or hazards are identified;
j) the trench will be reinstated with fill in accordance with the CEMP;
k) basic soil, erosion and water management plans have been recommended within the
CEMP where required;
l) it is not considered necessary for the proposed excavation to comply with the
requirement of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment
Wetlands and Waterways Works Manual given the minor scale of the proposed works
and distance and physical buffering of the proposed works from the North Esk River.
Levee modification
23
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
the following assessment is made against the relevant matters under the Performance Criteria
with respect to the proposed levee modificaitons:
a) the existing levee is located within 30m of the North Esk River. All works required by
the levee modifications will be located at the crest of the levee where the overall high of
the levee will be reduced. This area is flat an is unaffected by topographical constraints;
b) the potential for erosion is extremely low given that the excavation will involve the
stripping the crest of the levee and making good the surface. The existing pedestrian
walking track will be reinstated along the top of the levee. Accordingly, there will be not
overall changes to the existing structure and function of the levee;
c) the potential for silt and sedimentation to be transferred as a result of the excavation
will be reduced through the installation of sediment and erosion mitigation measures
which can be enforced by permit conditions;
d) the risk of flooding within the area of works is considered low given that they will be
located at the top of the flood levee bank;
e) no vegetation will be removed as a result of the excavation works, nor will the natural
hydrological processes of the North Esk (and Tamar) River be impeded, altered or
obstructed by the proposed excavation;
f) the existing flood levee does not contain significant natural or vegetation values;
g) the extent and scale of the excavation within 30m of the North Esk River will be minimal;
h) work will be undertaken using a small excavator with material to reused as fill within the
subject site. This method is considered reasonable for the proposed development;
i) no significant natural hazards have been identified which may affect the proposed
works;
j) the levee will be reinstated to accommodate the additional pedestrian traffic as a result
of the foot bridge;
k) basic soil, erosion and water management plans can be enforced by permit conditions;
l) it is not considered necessary for the proposed excavation to comply with the
requirement of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment
Wetlands and Waterways Works Manual given the minor scale of the proposed works
which will be located above the bank of the North Esk River.
24
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
E9.6.2 Development of watercourses and wetlands
Objective
To protect watercourses and wetlands from the effects of development and minimise water
quality degradation.
A1 P1 P1
A wetlands must not be altered, modified, filled, No performance criteria
drained, piped or channelled.
A2 P2P2P2
A pipe or culvert crossing of a watercourse for
Development within a watercourse must not
access purposes.
unreasonably impact the water quality or
ecological values of the watercourse, having
regard to:
(a) the topography of the site
(b) the potential for erosion
(c) the potential for siltation and

sedimentation
(d) the potential for dust generation
(e) the impact on hydrology
(f) the risk of flood
(g) the natural values of the watercourse
(h) the scale of the development
(i) the method of development, including any

vegetation removal, and the machinery
used
25
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
(j) the need for the development
(k) any measures to mitigate impacts
(l) any remediation measures proposed
(m) any soil and water management plan

and
(n) the requirements of the Department of

Primary Industries, Parks, Water and
Environment Wetlands and Waterways
Works Manual.
A1 Not applicable
It is not proposed to alter, modify, fill, drain, pipe or channel a wetland nor is it proposed to
construct a culvert or access across a watercourse.
E9.6.3 Discharge to Watercourses and Wetlands
To manage discharges to watercourses and wetlands so as not unreasonably impact the water
quality.
A1 P1 P1
All stormwater discharge must be:
Stormwater discharges must not
a) connected to the public stormwater unreasonably impact on the water quality
system or of watercourses or wetlands, having
regard to:
b) diverted to an on-site system that
contains stormwater within the site.
(a) the characteristics, volume and flow rates of
the discharge
(b) the characteristics of the receiving waters
(c) the potential for erosion
(d) the potential for siltation and

sedimentation
26
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
(e) the impact on hydrology
(f) any measures to mitigate impacts ad
(g) any soil and water management plan
Complies with A1 (a)
The stormwater drainage line will tap into the existing stormwater main which connects into an
existing penstock before discharging into the North Esk River. A copy of the location of existing
stormwater infrastructure within the subject site is contained within Appendix I.
A2.1 P1 P2
No new point source pollution discharging
directly into a watercourse or wetland. New and existing point source pollution
discharges must not unreasonably impact
A2.2 on the water quality of watercourses or
wetlands, having regard to:
For existing point source pollution discharge into
a watercourse or wetland, there is no more than
(a) the characteristics, volume and flow
a 10% increase in the volume or characteristics
of the discharge that existed at the effective rates of the discharge;
date. (b) the characteristics of the receiving
waters;
(c) the impact on hydrology;
(d) the opportunities to recycle or reuse
the discharge;
(e) any measures to mitigate impacts;
(f) best practice environmental
management; and
(g) any emission limit guidelines or
protected environmental values or
water quality objectives issued by
the Board of Environment
Protection Authority in accordance
with the State Policy for Water
Quality Management 1997.
Complies with A1 (a)
27
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
No new point source pollution will be discharged into the North Esk or Tamar Rivers.
Furthermore, the proposed development which involves the excavation of trenches, laying of
services and infrastructure and reinstating the trenches, will not increase surface water runoff
through the existing stormwater infrastructure and discharge point.
4.14 Recreation and Open Space Code E10.0

Not applicable because the application does not constitute a subdivision.
4.15 Environmental Impacts and Attenuation Code E11.0

Not applicable because the application does not involve a sensitive use or an activity listed in Tables
E11.1 or E11.2 with the potential to create environmental harm or nuisance.
4.16 Airports Impact Management Code E12.0

Not applicable because the subject site is not mapped as being within aircraft noise exposure forecast
contours and is not within prescribed airspace.
4.17 Local Historic Heritage Code E13.0

Not applicable because the subject site is not within an identified heritage precinct and is not
identified as a local heritage place or place of identified archaeological significance.
4.18 Coastal Code E14.0

Not applicable because the subject site is not mapped as being within a coastal area.
4.19 Telecommunications Code E15.0

Not applicable because the application does not involve telecommunications facilities.
4.20 Invermay/Inveresk Flood Inundation Area Code E16.0

The subject site is located within the Riveredge Recreational Precinct of the code.
Code Purpose
E16.1.1 The purpose of this provision is to reduce risks and hazards from flooding in the
Invermay/Inveresk flood inundation area and in particular:
(a) to limit development that increases the potential flood damage to residential
property subject to inundation;
(b) to limit land uses that create unacceptable levels of risk for residents in the
event of inundation; and
28
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
(c) to ensure that consideration is given to community, infrastructure and

environmental impacts of development on land subject to flood inundation.
Response
The proposed development is considered to be consistent with the purpose of the code on the
basis that the excavation works and installation of infrastructure and services and the
modification of the flood levee is not expected to result in unacceptable risks and hazards in the
event of a flood given that the infrastructure and services will be secured underground.
Use Standards
E16.6.1 Unacceptable Uses
Objective
To prevent unacceptable uses from establishing in areas subject to or isolated by, flood
inundation.
A1 P1 P1
Must not be: No performance criteria

a) Educational and occasional care; or
b) Emergency services; or
c) Hospital services..
Not applicable
The proposed use is defined as Passive Recreation.
A2 P1 P2
Must not be Residential unless: No performance criteria
(a) a single dwelling in the Invermay
Residential or Inveresk Residential
precincts;
(b) a multiple dwelling in the Invermay
Residential Precinct; or
(c) associated with and supporting the
educational activities within the
Inveresk Cultural precinct.
Not applicable
29
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
A3 P1 P3
Must not be Community meeting and No performance criteria
entertainment in the Riveredge Industrial or
Inveresk Residential precincts.
Not applicable
E16.7.1 Intensification of residential development
Objective
To limit the intensification of residential development in areas subject to, or seriously affected
by, flood inundation.
A1 P1 P1
New residential development or extensions of No performance criteria
existing buildings:
(a) must not increase the floor area of

individual dwellings or total floor area
on the title to more than 110% of that
existing or approved on the 1st January
2008; or
(b) must not result in more than 200m2 of
residential floor area on a single title;
or
(c) must be for residential uses associated

with and supporting the educational
activities within the Inveresk Cultural
Precinct.
Not applicable
A2 P1 P2
30
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Subdivision or division of land by strata plan No performance criteria

must not create any additional lots capable for
any future residential development.
Not applicable
No subdivision is proposed.
E16.7.2 Flood Impact
Objective
To ensure that new buildings and infrastructure are sited and designed to avoid or mitigate the
risk and minimise the impact of flooding.
A1 P1 P1
Floor levels of all habitable rooms within the No performance criteria
Residential use class must be at least 3.7m AHD.
Not applicable
A2 P1 P2
No acceptable solutions Buildings for residential purposes within the
Inveresk Cultural Precinct must be sited and
designed in accordance with a hydrological
report and an emergency management plan
prepared by a suitably qualified engineer
The report and plan must detail the risks and
likely impacts of a 1:20 year, 1:50 year and 1:100
year annual exceedance probability flood event
on the site, the building and its occupant and
how the development will be designed and how
the use will be managed to avoid, mitigate or
remedy the impacts to take account of:
a) the risk of levee failure in the vicinity of the
site;
31
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
b) the likely velocity of flood waters and depth

of inundation;
c) the need to locate electrical equipment and
other fittings above 1:100 year annual
exceedance probability flood level; the likely
affect of the use or development on flood
characteristics;
d) the safety of the occupants of the
development, potential evacuation routes
and whether there is a flood free access to
the land; and
e) the ability of the use or development to
withstand flood inundation and debris
damage and the necessity for the
incorporation of any flood proofing or
protection measures in the development.
Not applicable
No buildings for residential purposes are proposed as part of the works.
A3 P1 P3
All buildings not in the Residential use class Buildings not in the Residential use class must
must have a: be sited and designed in accordance with a
(a) floor level of at least 3.4m AHD; and hydrological report and an emergency
(b) gross floor area or not more than: management plan prepared by a suitably
i 400m2 qualified engineer. The report and plan must:
ii 10% more than that existing or approved (a) detail:
on the 1st January 2008
(i) the risks to life;
(ii) the likely impact on the use or
development; and
(iii) how the use or development will
manage the risk to tolerable levels;
during either an overtopping of the
levee or a levee breach at the closest
point in the levee during a 5% AEP,
2%AEP or a 1% AEP flood event; and
(b) consider the following:
32
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
(i) the likely velocity and depth of flood

waters;
(ii) the need to locate electrical

equipment and other fittings above the
1% AEP flood level;
(iii) the likely effect of the use or

development on flood characteristics;
(iv) the development and incorporation

of evacuation plans into emergency
management procedures for the
precinct; and
(v) the ability of the use or

development to withstand flood
inundation and debris damage and the
necessity for the incorporation of any
flood proofing measures in the
development.
Not Applicable
No buildings or structures (not in the Residential use class) have been proposed.
4.21 Cataract Gorge Management Area Code E17.0

Not applicable because the subject site is not mapped as being within Management Units MU1
MU18.
4.22 Signs Code E18.0

Not applicable. There are no signs proposed.
4.23 Development Plan Code E19.0

Not applicable because the application does not involve subdivision and is not mapped within an area
mapped as DPC.
33
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
5. Conclusion
The proposed site works involving the excavation of trenches for the provision of infrastructure and
services is categorised as a passive recreation use (no permit required) within the Open Space zone
and has been assessed against all relevant standards of the interim planning scheme. It has been
determined that the relies on Performance Criteria in relation to the following matters under the
following Codes:
Open Space Zone:

19.4.2 Landscaping (P1)
Potentially Contaminated Land Code:

E2.5.1 Use Standards (P1)
E2.6.2 Excavation (P1)
Water Quality Code:

E9.6.1 Development in the vicinity of watercourses and wetlands (P1)
E9.6.2 Development of watercourses and wetland (P2)
In all instances, compliance with the Performance Criteria has been demonstrated and significant
supporting information and assessments are included with the application.
Based on all the supporting information provided in this report, it is submitted that there is sufficient
justification to approve the proposed site works will directly facilitate the advancement of the North
Bank recreation project.
34
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Commercial Project Delivery ABN 51 921 459 008

PO Box 210 Newstead 7250
1/47A Brisbane Street, Launceston, 7250
T: 0408 397 393 E: chloe@cpdelivery.com.au
Document Status
Author: Chloe Lyne

Version: 1
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
river
urban
play
plaza
events
picnic lawn lawn
confluence
play
gorge
play
wild core
Sky walk
Northbank 03 | Titles & Cadastre Plan

28th April 2017 - V1
Design Development Client: Cit y of Launceston P L AY S T R E E T
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Environmental Site Assessment

Installation of Underground Services for
North Bank Redevelopment
transport | community | mining | industrial | food & beverage | carbon & energy
Prepared for: Launceston City Council
Client representative: Jade Kay
Date: 19 June 2017

Rev 00
Now part of the pitt&sherry group

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4
1.1 Background .................................................................................................................................... 4
1.2 Objectives....................................................................................................................................... 4
1.3 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................ 4
2. Site Setting ................................................................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Site identification ........................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Current and proposed land use and zoning ................................................................................... 5
2.3 Surrounding land use ..................................................................................................................... 5
2.4 Geology .......................................................................................................................................... 5
2.5 Topography .................................................................................................................................... 5
2.6 Vegetation ...................................................................................................................................... 5
2.7 Surface water and site drainage .................................................................................................... 6
2.8 Hydrogeology ................................................................................................................................. 6
2.9 Acid sulfate soils............................................................................................................................. 6
3. Historical Review ....................................................................................................................................... 6
3.1 Property title records ..................................................................................................................... 6
3.2 Aerial photography ........................................................................................................................ 7
3.3 Planning and regulatory review ..................................................................................................... 8
3.4 Launceston City Council records .................................................................................................... 8
3.5 Environmental prosecutions .......................................................................................................... 8
4. Other Northbank investigations ................................................................................................................ 9
4.1 Northbank Preliminary Investigation (2013) ................................................................................. 9
4.2 Boral (61 Lindsay St) Due Diligence Investigation (2015) .............................................................. 9
4.3 Groundwater bore installation and sampling (2015)...................................................................10
5. Site inspection and interviews ................................................................................................................10
6. Summary of past potentially contaminating activities ...........................................................................10
7. Site Investigation Methodology ..............................................................................................................11
8. Quality Assessment .................................................................................................................................12
9. Assessment Criteria .................................................................................................................................14
10.1 Sample description ......................................................................................................................14
10.2 Results ..........................................................................................................................................15
11. Discussion of results and risk assessment ...............................................................................................16
12. Conclusions and recommendations ........................................................................................................18
13. Important Information ............................................................................................................................19
13.1 Scope of services ..........................................................................................................................19
13.2 Reliance on data...........................................................................................................................19
13.3 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................................................19
List of tables
Table 1 - Site details............................................................................................................................................ 5
Table 2 Site ownership details ......................................................................................................................... 6
Table 3 - Review of historical aerial photographs .............................................................................................. 7
Table 4 - Summary of potential sources of contamination at the site .............................................................11
Table 5 - Summary of potential off-site sources of contamination..................................................................11
Table 6 - Summary of soil assessment methodology .......................................................................................12
Table 7 - Field QA/QC Procedure......................................................................................................................13
Table 8 - Laboratory QA/QC procedures ..........................................................................................................13
Table 9 - Soil assessment criteria .....................................................................................................................14
Table 10 - Soil sample description ....................................................................................................................15
Table 11. Summary of criteria exceedences.....................................................................................................15
pitt&sherry ref: HB17014H003 REP 31P Trenching ESA Rev00/SLR/lc

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
List of figures
Figure 1 - Conceptual Site Model (shading denotes potential pathway) ........................................................17
Appendices
Appendix A: Location of proposed trenches
Appendix B: Underground services (Northbank)
Appendix C: Historical aerial photographs
Appendix D: Sample location plan
Appendix E: Soil sampling results
Appendix F: Laboratory Certificates of Analysis
Prepared by: . Date: 19 June 2017

Sophie Le Roux
Reviewed by: . Date: 19 June 2017

Ian Woodward
Authorised by: . Date: 19 June 2017

David Lenel
Revision History
Rev
Description Prepared by Reviewed by Authorised by Date
No.
A Draft to client SLR IOW DL 08/06/17
00 Trenching ESA Report SLR IOW DL 19/06/17
2017 pitt&sherry
This document is and shall remain the property of pitt&sherry. The document may only be used for the purposes for
which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of
this document in any form is prohibited.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
pitt&sherry were commissioned by the City of Launceston (CoL) to prepare an Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA) to support the development application to install underground services for the proposed
Northbank redevelopment in Invermay.
An ESA is required as part of the development application to ensure that works involving excavation of
potentially contaminated land does not adversely impact on human health or the environment in
accordance with the Launceston Interim Planning Scheme 2015, section E2.6.2.
A separate environmental assessment has been undertaken by pitt&sherry for the whole of the Northbank
area (the Northbank ESA)1. Some of the findings of the Northbank ESA have been included in this report.
For this ESA, targeted soil testing for contaminants of potential concern identified in the Northbank ESA was
carried out along the proposed trenches for installation of underground services.
1.2 Objectives
The principal objective of this ESA is to assess potential contamination from historical activities through
targeted soil sampling and make recommendations as to the level of risk posed by excavation of the trenches
for installation of underground services at Northbank.
1.3 Scope of Work

The ESA was carried out in accordance with the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site
Contamination) Measure 1999 (NEPM - amended 2013), Tasmanian EPA guidelines and Australian
Standards. The scope of work included the following.
Preparation of a sampling plan based on information compiled in the Northbank ESA.
Targeted soil sampling and analysis, and review of results against relevant site investigation levels.
Preparation of Conceptual Site Model and risk assessment.
2. Site Setting
2.1 Site Identification
A plan showing the location of the proposed trenches for installation of underground services was forwarded
by CoL and has been attached in Appendix A (red lines). The area of land subject to this ESA is limited to the
location of the proposed trenches (referred to as the investigation area).
The main proposed trench runs along Taroona Street for about 80 m with three other shorter trenches
running from the main trench (Appendix A).
1
Draft Environmental Site Assessment, Northbank Redevelopment Launceston City Council. pitt&sherry, 13 April
2017.
pitt&sherry ref: HB17014H003 REP 31P Trenching ESA Rev00/SLR/lc 4

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Table 1 - Site details
Investigation Area Details
Street address Taroona Street, Invermay (Tasmania)

Property ID Part of 6568182 and 6568174
Title references Part of 169882/1
Site area Estimated 200 m2
Owner Launceston City Council
Local Government Area Launceston City Council
Proposed land use Excavation and recreational (parkland)
2.2 Current and Proposed Land Use And Zoning

Council is planning to install underground services before the redevelopment of Northbank into a
recreational area. CoL has indicated that the proposed trenches will be dug to a depth of 600-700 mm.
Under the Launceston Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the investigation area is zoned Open Space.
2.3 Surrounding Land Use

The proposed trenches are located in the Northbank area which has a history of mixed semi-industrial use.
The proposed trenches run through land vacant at the time of this report, with the currently operating Boral
site to the south-east and the North Esk River to the south.
2.4 Geology
As identified in The LIST2, the Mineral Resources Tasmania (MRT) Geological Polygons, 1:25,000 mapping,
the site is underlain by Quaternary sediments of the Undifferentiated Cenozoic sequences. The geology of
the investigation area is generally defined as Qhiv.
Qhiv is described as estuarine deposits of clayey silt, silt, sand and subordinate gravel, supra-estuarine swamp
and laterally derived alluvial, deposits, unmapped man-made deposits including silt dredgings; in
environments inferred to lie above frequent tidal influence. This description is consistent with observations
of cuttings along Lindsay Street and other investigations completed by pitt&sherry for unrelated projects
along Lindsay Street.
There is no indication that Northbank was reclaimed or infilled.
2.5 Topography
The investigation area sits at an elevation of approximately 5-6 m. The site is generally level, with a gentle
slope toward the river.
2.6 Vegetation
According to TASVEG 3.0 mapping, the vegetation community at most of the investigation area would be
classified as Agricultural, urban and exotic vegetation (FUR), Urban areas. The site hosts very little vegetation,
consistent with its previous semi-industrial use.
2
http://maps.thelist.tas.gov.au/listmap/app/list/map

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Due to the previous disturbance at the site and the surrounding area, there is considered to be no significant
flora or fauna values within or surrounding the site. A review of the Natural Values Atlas (DPIPWE) identified
no threatened flora or fauna species within or in the vicinity of the site.
2.7 Surface Water and Site Drainage

Northbank is located at the confluence between the North Esk and Tamar Rivers.
A plan showing current underground services for Northbank has been provided in Appendix B. A stormwater
drain runs across Northbank along Taroona Street into the river. As the vast majority of Northbank comprises
unsealed open ground, surface water is anticipated to either recharge to groundwater or run-off into the
river either directly or through the stormwater drain. All stormwater from the Boral plant is directed to the
local municipal wastewater treatment plant.
2.8 Hydrogeology
Groundwater is expected to be intercepted at shallow depths based on experiences from other sites in
Invermay and the local topography, and is expected to flow toward the river.
A groundwater bore was installed and monitored by pitt&sherry at the end of Taroona Street in September
2014. The measured groundwater depth was 0.5 m below natural ground level. Refer to Section 4.3 for
further information on groundwater quality monitored in the bore.
No groundwater bores are registered for use within a 2km radius of the site. No known groundwater uses
exist in the area and demand for groundwater is unlikely as the site is serviced by potable water network and
no stock grazing or irrigation occurs on or around the site.
2.9 Acid Sulfate Soils

The locations of the trenches (5-20 m AHD) are considered by DPIPWE (Resource Management and
Conservation) to have a low probability of coastal ASS occurrence (6-70%).
3. Historical Review
Information on the history of Northbank and surrounding land was obtained from the following sources:
Historical aerial photographs from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment
(DPIPWE)
Historical property records and certificates of title from The List (DPIPWE)
Current or historical dangerous good registered with Workplace Standard Tasmania (WST)
Property Information Request from the Contaminated Sites Unit of the Tasmanian EPA
Enquiries and interviews with Launceston City Council3 and Boral staff4 regarding any environmental
protection infringement notices issues at the site and historical activities.
3.1 Property Title Records

Property information reports were obtained from The LIST in March 2017. Recent ownership and known uses
of the parcels of land that the trenches will run through are shown in Table 2.
Table 2 Site ownership details
3
Jade Kay, Max Butler and Robert Holmes (Launceston City Council)
4
Angela Riley, Production Manager (Boral)

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
PID Original Ownership Time Uses and leases Comments

Derivation
6568182 The Crown Launceston City 9/2015 current Roberts wool Wool store building
Council store and grain contained asbestos,
DPIPWE 6/1988 1/2016 store (both sides building demolished
Roberts Ltd (lessee) 6/1988 12/2014 of Taroona St) in 2012
Crown 7/1982 6/1988
6568174 The Crown Launceston City 9/2015 - current Warehouse Demolished under
Council BA0707/2012
DPIPWE 4/2004 9/2015
DELM 3/1994 4/2004
DPIPWE 6/1988 9/2015
Crown 7/1982 - 6/1998
3.2 Aerial Photography

A total of nine historical aerial photographs of the Northbank area were examined from 1921 to 2009 in order
to determine past activities and land use at the site. Copies of the photographs are available in Appendix C
and a detailed review has been included in Table 3.
The photographs show the progressive development of the Northbank area from agricultural and vacant
grassland to an industrial area. However, the specific area of land subject to this ESA was never developed
and has remained vacant land used to access the river for recreational purposes.
Table 3 - Review of historical aerial photographs
Item Date and scale Observations

Photo 1921 Northbank and surroundings mostly vacant grassland. Some shed present on site,
1 Scale unknown possibly for agricultural use or for cargo shipping.
Photo 1955 Large Grain Shed and Roberts Wool Store present at 79 Lindsay Street.
2 Scale unknown Surroundings: Land for future concrete manufacturing (north-west of site) is still
vacant. Dirt track runs through northern part of Northbank, appears to be old
railway line from timber mill. Sheds present in Photo 1 no longer present.
Photo 1971 Surroundings: Large gravel yard present north-west of the site with office building
3 Scale 1:6000 (Woodfield & French). Railway line for timber mill visible through north of
Northbank. Grain storage in silos present north of the railway line (two large ASTs
and one smaller AST). Large track and small marina built along North Esk river.
Photo 1976 Surroundings: The white track running along the banks appears to a flood levee.
4 Scale 1:6200 Four large grain silos (Tas Grain) present in the north-west corner of Northbank.
Photo 1984 Surroundings: Concrete manufacturing plant has been developed (BMG, later Boral)
5 Scale 1:5000 north of the site, with two new buildings and concrete plant.
Photo 1986 Surroundings: Boral concrete plant further developed, layout similar to present.
6 Scale unknown
Photo 1991 Taroona Street appears to be a bitumen road.
7 Scale 1:4000 Surroundings: Railway line no longer present. Location of fuel dispensing stations
identified in WST files apparent at Boral site (just outside north-west corner of office
building and opposite chemical storage area).
Photo 2002 Tank farm present just north of 3 Taroona Street, believed to be owned by Tas Grain.
8 Scale 1:10000 Additional small tanks near two large silos.
Surroundings: Concrete plant expanded (three new tanks at 65 Lindsay Street).
Truck wash bay visible in south eastern part of Boral site.
Photo 2009 Surroundings: Rowing club rooms built (large white square roof).
9 Scale 1:7000

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
3.3 Planning and Regulatory Review

Information from the following regulatory agencies was gained in 2012 for the whole of Northbank5:
Tasmanian EPA and WorkSafe Tasmania (WST). This information has not been updated for this ESA as the
only changes in land use that have occurred since that time have been to create vacant land (cessation of
activities and demolition of buildings).
3.3.1 EPA Property Information Request

A Property Information Request Form (PIR) was submitted to the Tasmanian Environment Protection
Authoritys (EPA) Contaminated Sites Unit (CSU) in October 20125. The CSU maintains databases and records
held by the EPA relating to the Environmental Management and Pollution Control (Underground Petroleum
Storage Systems) Regulations 2010; industrial sites (which are or have been regulated by the EPA); historic
landfills; contamination issues reported to the Division; and incidents and complaints that have been
recorded relating to historical storage of dangerous goods (prior to 1993).
The search of relevant databases and records by the CSU identified no records relating to contamination or
potentially contaminating activities at the site. EPA records identified that fuel storage occurred at properties
along Lindsay Street, however their locations could not be confirmed due to incomplete records.
3.3.2 Dangerous Goods Register

A search of Workplace Standards Tasmania (WST) records of dangerous goods information was carried out
in October 2012. No files were identified for the area of land subject to this ESA.
However, a file was found for the adjacent Boral site (WST Reference: 0242)5. A review of the file indicated
some underground fuel storage of Petrol (5.4 kL) was licensed on 61 Lindsay Street, however a Statutory
Declaration dated 9 August 2000 indicated all dangerous goods kept or stored on 61 Lindsay Street had been
removed. The Statutory Declaration was accepted by WST.
The site plans included in the WST file highlighted two locations where underground tanks were housed.
Locations were near the site entrance and administration building and south west corner of the site. These
locations were later confirmed during pitt&sherry site inspection. The tanks are located about 80 to 100 m
away from the site subject to this ESA.
The file does not contain a decommissioning report for the underground tanks or reasons why they were
removed. It is assumed that no environmental assessment occurred during decommissioning of the
underground tanks as no relevant documentation is contained or referred to in the WST file; which also refers
to above ground storage. A diesel tank is present on site and used for the water heating system. The diesel
tank is located at least 50 m away from the proposed trenches.
3.4 Launceston City Council Records

Council does not hold any records of relevant environmental incidents that may have caused localised
environmental nuisance or harm and impact on future use or users of the site6. Clearance certificates for the
removal of asbestos from the Roberts store buildings (79 Lindsay Street) are held by Council.
3.5 Environmental Prosecutions

There have been no recorded prosecutions by court proceedings or environment protection notices for the
responsible persons or companies nominated on the EPA and WST files and databases.
5
Preliminary Contamination Investigation, North Bank, Launceston. pitt&sherry, July 2013
6
Verbal communication, Matthew Skirving and Jade Kaye of Launceston City Council.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
4. Other Northbank investigations

A separate ESA has been prepared by pitt&sherry of the whole Northbank area for Launceston City Council:
Draft Environmental Site Assessment, Northbank Redevelopment (13 April 2017) LCC.
The Northbank ESA includes a detailed description and results of the following previous investigations:
Preliminary Site Investigation, Northbank (July 2013) prepared by pitt&sherry for LCC
Due Diligence Investigation, 61 Lindsay Street, Launceston (20 February 2015) - prepared by pitt&sherry
for LCC
Installation and sampling of one groundwater bore at the end of Taroona Street (refer to Memo from
pitt&sherry addressed to Max Butler dated 7 October 2014).
A brief summary of these investigations has been provided below. The outcomes of all previous assessments
have been included in the summary of past potentially contaminating activities in Section 6.
4.1 Northbank Preliminary Investigation (2013)

Launceston City Council engaged pitt&sherry to conduct some preliminary soil sampling at Northbank, to
highlight any contamination issues that may require further investigation before redevelopment of the site.
The results of the preliminary investigation showed that no soil samples analysed recorded contaminants
exceeding the adopted criteria for recreational use. However, asbestos was detected by laboratory testing in
a surface soil sample from the location of the former wool store.
The report recommended immediate management of the identified asbestos, including fencing the site of
the former wool store to prevent public access and establishing a suitable cover to limit the potential for
airborne fragments. This was later implemented by CoL (refer to Section 5).
As no contaminants were identified in exceedance of the recreational use criteria, no further investigations
were recommended. However, assessment of the Boral site was recommended as it could not be assessed
at the time of the investigation. This was later done in 2014-2015 (refer to Section 4.2).
The installation of a groundwater monitoring bore at the end of Taroona Street was recommended to
determine whether any groundwater contamination is present that could potentially affect future users. A
bore was further installed and monitored in 2015 (refer to Section 4.3).
4.2 Boral (61 Lindsay St) Due Diligence Investigation (2015)

This investigation was a targeted soil sampling program to investigate the potential for soil contamination
from former underground storage tanks at the Boral site.
Former underground fuel storage tanks were identified at two separate locations within the Boral site,
through WST records and interviews with site employees. It is believed that all storage tanks were removed
but that no environmental assessment was carried out at the time of decommissioning.
A total of 16 soil samples were collected by pitt&sherry in September 2014 at the two locations of the former
tanks, at depths between 0.5 and 2.6 m below ground level. Lead and petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations
were identified in exceedance of health investigation levels in three samples near the administration block,
and hydrocarbons in one sample in the middle of the yard.
The lead contamination levels exceeded the health investigation level for recreational use (NEPM, 2013)7.
7
National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999 (amended 2013)

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
4.3 Groundwater bore installation and sampling (2015)

Launceston City Council engaged pitt&sherry to install and sample a groundwater bore at the end of Taroona
Street to identify any localised groundwater impacts that may need to be managed during the Northbank
redevelopment.
The groundwater was measured at 0.5 m below ground level in the bore. No odours, sheens or scums
indicative of gross contamination were observed during sampling. Phenolic compounds, polyaromatic
hydrocarbons, mercury and PCBs were all below the limit of reporting. Petroleum hydrocarbons were mostly
below the limit of reporting or marginally detected. Arsenic and lead levels in the groundwater exceeded
the drinking water criteria. No further investigations were recommended at the time of the assessment as
drinking water was not identified as a potential use at the site.
5. Site inspection and interviews

A site inspection and interviews with Boral and Launceston City Council staff8 were carried out on 16 March
2017 by Sophie Le Roux, Senior Environmental Scientist at pitt&sherry. The purpose of the site inspection
was to assess current site conditions.
The main information relevant to this ESA gained from the site inspection and interviews is as follows:
New flood levees and gates have been constructed on Taroona Street toward the Lindsay Street end,
along the boundary with the grain silos site and along Lindsay Street in front of the large rowing club. The
source of fill for the new levees is clay from the Carrick clay pit (assumed to be clean fill). Council staff
believe that the source of fill for the old levees is the same, although this could not be verified
Asbestos was removed from the former Roberts grain store building during demolition in 2015, however
no clearance certificate for that location has been provided to pitt&sherry
The sites of the former Roberts buildings have been backfilled with clayey soil and are overgrown with
grass and weeds. The fill source is from the Kings Meadow High School (assumed to be clean fill total
of 1500 m3). It is assumed that these parcels were backfilled to limit exposure to asbestos fines that may
have been present at the surface of the soil
A new bitumen road has been constructed through 3 Taroona Street and 65 Lindsay Street to provide
access to the Boral site and to the rowing rooms
The ground surface on the eastern portion of the Boral site is paved with concrete, with gravel surface
on the western portion
All sewage and stormwater from the Boral site report to the municipal sewage treatment system. A sump
is present at the north of the Boral site near the laboratory building
The truck wash runoff in the south-east corner of the Boral site is piped directly to sewer
There are no known environmental incidents at the Boral site. Spills are dealt with using spill kits (dust)
kept on site.
6. Summary of past potentially contaminating activities

The known current and historical potentially contaminating activities that have been identified at the site
and on adjacent land have been summarised in Table 5 and Table 5. Uncontrolled fill has not been considered
as a potential source of contamination as Council indicated that all fill imported to site for construction of
the levees or as backfill originated from known sources assumed to be clean (Carrick clay pit and Kings
Meadow high school).
8
Mr Max Butler and Mr Robert Holmes, Launceston City Council; Ms Angela Riley, Boral.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Table 4 - Summary of potential sources of contamination at the site
Potentially contaminating Potential contaminants Media Existing information

activities
Former grain storage (79 Pesticides and fungicides Soils Nil
Lindsay Street)
Railways Petroleum hydrocarbons, Soils Nil. The location of the former
polycyclic aromatic railway line has now been covered in
hydrocarbons, pesticides, bitumen.
metals
Asbestos in two former Asbestos (buried) Soils Asbestos removed from buildings and
Roberts store buildings was detected at location of former
wool store. Fill was subsequently
imported as cover.
Table 5 - Summary of potential off-site sources of contamination
Potential sources of Potential Distance Existing information

contamination contaminants to site
Concrete plant, waste oil Hydrocarbons, 50m + Lead measured in soil (1.2 and 1.8m depth)
storage, above ground fuel metals, asbestos (AST) at location of former underground storage
storage tank and former 80-100 tank, at levels exceeding recreational use
underground storage tanks m and industrial use criteria.
(61 Lindsay Street Boral (USTs) Hydrocarbons measured in soils (0.5 and 0.8
site) m depth) at levels exceeding management
limits.
Arsenic and lead measured in groundwater
bore (0.5 m) at end of Taroona Street above
drinking water levels (Section 4.3).
Gunns timber mill, Hydrocarbons, 50m + Due Diligence Environmental Site Assessment,
including above and metals, Lindsay Street, Invermay, Tasmania. Compass
underground fuel storage, chlorinated Environmental for Property-Logic Pty Ltd (4
waste oil storage and solvents November 2011)
possible use of chlorinated
solvents in workshop
7. Site Investigation Methodology

A sampling programme was developed based on the potential areas of contamination and potential
contaminants of concern identified in Tables 4 and 5.
Targeted soil sampling was completed by pitt&sherry on 30 May 2017 (sample locations are shown in
Appendix D). No water was encountered in the boreholes during sampling. A summary of the soil assessment
methodology adopted for this investigation is provided in Table 6.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Table 6 - Summary of soil assessment methodology

Activity Details / Comments
Sampling strategy Soil samples were collected at six locations along the proposed trenches (Appendix
D). A minimum sampling density of 1 sample per 25m3 was chosen to allow for the
potential classification for off-site disposal of the excavated soil (estimated volume
of excavated soil is 140m3). The locations were chosen based on the most likely
potential impact from current and historical activities. At each location, two or three
samples were collected from different depths to a maximum of 600-700mm (depth
of proposed trenches).
Sampling method Boreholes were dug using a hand auger. All soil samples were collected directly into
the sampling vessels to avoid cross-contamination.
Soil screening Soils were screened in the field for visual signs of contamination, including odour,
scums or the presence of asbestos.
Soil logging Soil types were logged by pitt&sherry field scientist (Table 9).
Laboratory The soil samples were submitted to ALS Laboratory in Melbourne (NATA accredited)
analysis for analysis of the following parameters identified as potential contaminants of
concern:
Metals
Total and Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH/TRH)
OC/OP pesticides
Polynuclear Aromatic Compounds (PAHs)
Holding times and Sample holding times and preservation were acceptable (based on NEPM 2013 and
preservation laboratory recommendations) from collection to laboratory processing.
8. Quality Assessment
Tables 7 and 8 of this document indicate conformance to field QA/QC and laboratory QA/QC procedures,
respectively.
It is considered that the QA/QC program implemented during this investigation is generally appropriate,
representative and robust, and the analytical results obtained are of acceptable quality for the purposes of
this report.
The field observations and analytical results are deemed reliable and can be relied upon to assess suitability
of the site for the proposed use.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Table 7 - Field QA/QC Procedure
QA/QC Requirement Completed Comments

Appropriate sampling Yes Sampling program was undertaken in accordance with AS4482.1-
strategy used and 2005 and NEPM (2013). The number and locations of samples
representative samples collected from each area are appropriate based on the site
collected assessment objectives.
Sampling conducted by Yes Sampling was conducted by pitt&sherry field scientist. Only staff
appropriately qualified with recent contaminated land sampling experience were selected
staff as part of the project team.
Appropriate and well Yes All sample containers and sample eskies were checked prior to use
documented sample to ensure that no cross-contamination risks were present.
collection, handling, Appropriately clean and/or sterile sampling equipment and
logging and transportation vessels were used. Samples were immediately transferred to the
correctly labelled sampling vessel. The samples were placed into a
cooled esky for sample preservation before transport and delivery
to the laboratory.
Chain of custody Yes All samples were transported under appropriate chain of custody
documentation completed procedures (signed CoC documents are included in Appendix F)
Required number of blind No No duplicate samples were collected (omission).
duplicates collected
(minimum 1:20)
Trip samples collected N/A
Acceptable trip blank N/A
results
Samples delivered to Yes Samples were delivered to the laboratories within the sample
laboratory within sample holding times and in laboratory-supplied containers. No holding
holding times time breaches were noted in laboratory report.
Table 8 - Laboratory QA/QC procedures
QA/QC Requirement Completed Comments

Samples extracted and analysed Yes All analytes were extracted within holding times.
within relevant holding times Refer to ALS Interpretive Quality Control Reports in
Appendix F.
All analyses NATA accredited Yes ALS is NATA accredited for all the analyses performed.
Appropriate analytical methodologies Yes Refer to the Interpretive Quality Control reports in
used, in accordance with Schedule Appendix H for methods used and relevance to
B(3) of the NEPM Schedule B(3) of the NEPM.
Acceptable laboratory LORs adopted Yes Laboratory LORs were all lower than assessment
criteria.
Acceptable laboratory QC results: Yes The internal laboratory quality control report is
Surrogates: 70% to 130% recovery provided within the laboratory certificates of analysis
(Appendix F).
Matrix Spikes: 70% to 130%
recovery for organics or 80%- Laboratory recoveries were all within acceptable
120% recovery for inorganics range.
Control Samples: 70% to 130% Matrix spike results were all within acceptable range.
recovery for soil or 80% to 120% Laboratory control blank results were all below the
recovery for waters LORs.
Duplicate Samples: < 20% to 50% No outliers of laboratory RPD values were reported.
RPD Method blank results were all below the LORs.
Method Blanks: zero to <PQL.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
9. Assessment Criteria
The criteria used to assess the soil analytical results, derived on the proposed site uses (excavation and
recreational), are summarised in Table 9Table 9. For soil disposal purposes, all results were also compared to
maximum recommended concentrations for EPA waste classification (IB 105)9.
Table 9 - Soil assessment criteria
Reference Sub Reference Reason for Use

National Environment Health Investigation
Protection (Assessment Assessment of human health risk based on
Levels for Recreational
of Site Contamination) proposed use of the site.
use HIL-C (Table 1A-1)
Measure, 1999 (amended
2013) Health Screening Levels
Assessment of human risk of vapour intrusion
for Recreational use for
from hydrocarbons in soils. CLAY was used as the
Vapour Intrusion (HSL-C)
dominant soil type.
(Table 1A-3)
Ecological Screen Levels
Assessment of ecological risk from hydrocarbons
(ESLs) for Open Space,
to site vegetation and fauna.
Fine material (Table 1B-6)
Ecological Investigation Assessment of ecological risk from metalloids to
Levels (EILs) for Open site vegetation and fauna. Additional parameters
Space (Table 1B-1 to 1B- such as pH, Cation Exchange Capacity and Clay
5) content were measured to allow use of EILs.
CRC Care (2011). Health Screening Levels Assessment of human risk of vapour intrusion
Technical Report No.10 for Vapour Intrusion into trench (to 1m) from hydrocarbons in soils.
Intrusive Maintenance
Workers (Table B3)
Health Screening Levels Assessment of human risk from direct contact
for Direct Contact with hydrocarbons in surface soils (recreational
Recreational/Open Space users).
(Table B4)
Health Screening Levels Assessment of human risk from direct contact
for Direct Contact with hydrocarbons in surface and subsurface soils
Intrusive Maintenance (excavation workers).
Workers (Table B4)
10. Results of Investigation

10.1 Sample description
Details of the soil samples collected for this investigation are provided in Table 10 and shown on the sample
location plan in Appendix D. Visual inspection of the soils during sampling didnt find any evidence of
asbestos. No water was encountered in the boreholes during sampling.
9
Tasmanian EPA, 2012. Information Bulletin No.105 - Classification and Management of Contaminated Soil for Disposal
(November 2012).

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Table 10 - Soil sample description
Sample Sample ID Sampling depth Notes

location (mm bgl)
SB1 SB1-A 0-500 Gravelly fill, clay based with pieces of brick and
concrete gravel
SB1-B 500-700 Finer gravels but still high clay content
SB2 SB2-A 250-500 Fine brown orange sand (under 250mm heavy dark
clay)
SB2-C 500-600 Grey clay with sand
SB2-B 600-700 Pure fine grey clay, moist and soft
SB3 SB3-A 100 Heavy dark and stiff clay. Ground level is about 1.2m
SB3-C 300 above Taroona Street (imported clay)
SB3-B 700
SB4 SB4-A 0-300 Stiff clay
SB4-B 600-700 Pure fine grey clay, moist and soft (under 300mm of
fine brown orange sand)
SB5 SB5-A 0-300 Stiff dark heavy clay
SB5-C 300-500 Dark friable dry clay
SB5-B 500-700 Light brown dry friable clay
SB6 SB6-A 100 Stiff dark heavy clay
SB6-B 600
10.2 Results
Tabulated soil results have been provided in Appendix E. The laboratory certificates of analysis are included
in Appendix F.
10.2.1 Comparison with site assessment criteria

No contaminants were measured in exceedance of the assessment criteria for the protection of excavation
workers.
One sample (SB1-B) contained carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (carcinogenic PAHs, reported
as benzo(a)pyrene TEQ toxic equivalent quotient) at a concentration higher than the human health
investigation level for recreational use (refer to Table 11). This sample was collected at the start of Taroona
Street, just on the inside of the new flood gate. It is likely that the presence of PAHs in the soil is related to
the presence of the former railways at that location.
Benzo(a)pyrene, a genotoxic carcinogen PAH, was measured at that location in exceedance of the ecological
screening level for public open space (Table 11).
Table 11. Summary of criteria exceedences
Location Depth Contaminants Concentrations Criteria Criteria description

(m bgl) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
SB1-B 500- Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ* 7.8 3 Health Investigation
700 Level (Recreational)
SB1-A, SB1-B 0-500 Benzo(a)pyrene 1 0.7 Ecological Screening
Level (Public Open
500- 5.3 0.7
Space)
700
* TEQ = Toxic Equivalent Quotient, based on 8 carcinogenic PAHs and their toxicity relative to benzo(a) pyrene
No other contaminants were measured above the adopted human health or ecological criteria.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
10.2.2 Classification of soil for disposal

The results were compared against soil classification levels for off-site disposal in accordance with EPA
Information Bulletin No.10510 (refer to the tabulated results in Appendix E).
Most of the samples would be classified as Level 1 Fill, with the exception of the soil at location SB1 (near
the new flood gate and the former railways) where, based on the benzo(a)pyrene concentrations, the shallow
sample (0-500mm) would be classified as Level 2 - Low Level Contaminated and the deeper sample (500-
700mm) would be classified as Level 3 - Contaminated.
Some minor exceedences of Level 1 -Fill concentrations were identified at location SB6 (arsenic and
chromium) and at SB5 (zinc) but these are not deemed significant enough to affect the classification level of
the soil.
11. Discussion of results and risk assessment

A risk assessment has been prepared to specifically address the potential contamination risk to human
receptors during and after excavation of trenches for installation of underground services. Given the small
size of the area of land subject to this ESA, the potential risk to off-site ecological receptors has been
addressed separately under the whole of Northbank ESA11.
A Conceptual Site Model (CSM) has been developed based on pitt&sherrys understanding of the site setting,
in order to identify potentially significant source-pathway-receptor linkages with regard to human health and
the environment (Figure 1).
Potential sources of contamination at the site have been listed in Section 6. As described in Section 10,
localised soil contamination was found within the investigation area. The contamination found was restricted
to benzo(a)pyrene and other carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sample SB1, located
at the entrance of Taroona Street near the new flood gate and near the location of the former railways.
The main pathways of human exposure to benzo(a)pyrene and PAHs are through ingestion, dermal contact
and dust inhalation. PAHs typically have low mobility in the environment. Groundwater has not been
considered as a potential pathway given the depth of the proposed excavation and that no water was
encountered during sampling. The likelihood of groundwater underneath the trenches being contaminated
with hydrocarbons to such levels that it will pose a risk from vapour inhalation is considered to be low.
Receptors potentially affected by the contamination are:

Future users of the proposed recreational area: carcinogenic PAHs were measured at location SB1 in
exceedance of the recreational health investigation criteria at a depth of 500-700 mm (concentration in
the surface sample was low). SB1 is located where the Northbank car park is proposed to be built (paved).
Therefore, the risk of exposure to future recreational users is considered to be low.
Construction workers during installation of underground services: all contaminant concentrations were
lower than the adopted assessment criteria for protection of intrusive maintenance workers. The
identified PAH contamination is therefore not considered to pose a risk to excavation workers during the
installation of underground services.
Ecological receptors potentially affected by the contamination are the site flora and fauna.
Benzo(a)pyrene was measured at SB1 (0-500 and 500-700 m depth) above the adopted ecological
screening level. However, this area is proposed to be paved for construction of the Northbank car park,
with little vegetation of significance. Therefore, the risk to ecological receptors is considered to be low.
10
Tasmanian EPA, 2012. Information Bulletin No.105 - Classification and Management of Contaminated Soil for Disposal
(November 2012).
11
Draft Environmental Site Assessment, Northbank Redevelopment LCC. pitt&sherry, 13 April 2017.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Primary Secondary Transport Exposure Potential Receptors

Sources Sources Mechanisms Pathways
Former grain storage Impacted surface soil Soil ingestion / Dermal

(pesticides, fungicides) (down to 1m depth) Contact On-site human and
BaP TEQ > HIL Wind erosion and
Atmospheric ecological:
(localised around SB1)
Dispersion
Former railways
(hydrocarbons, metals, Future recreational
pesticides) users
Volatilisation and
Atmospheric Inhalation Construction workers
Former buildings Impacted subsurface Dispersion
(asbestos) soil (> 1m depth) Site flora and fauna
Volatilisation and
Vapour Intrusion
Inhalation
Potential off-site sources: Leaching and
former underground fuel Groundwater (not Groundwater
tanks and waste oil storage encountered in Transport Dermal Contact
(metals, hydrocarbons) excavation)
Drinking
Use
Impacted surficial soil, Stormwater/
sediment, or surface Surface Water Recreational Use /
water Transport Sensitive Habitat
Legend Potential pathway
Risk unknown
Risk assessed and potentially unacceptable
Risk assessed and acceptable
Figure 1 - Conceptual Site Model (shading denotes potential pathway)

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
12. Conclusions and recommendations

pitt&sherry has undertaken an environmental assessment of the area of land that will be excavated for
installation of underground services for the planned Northbank recreational area. A separate site assessment
has been prepared by pitt&sherry for the whole Northbank redevelopment.
The investigation area is a proposed main trench from the flood gate to about 100 m along Taroona Street,
with four shorter trenches running on each side from the main trench. This assessment included a site history
review and targeted soil sampling at several locations along the proposed trenches.
A summary of the information gained through the site history review is as follows:
Although Taroona Street itself has remained mostly undeveloped, Northbank has been an
industrial/commercial area since the 1950s
Flood levees were constructed along the southern boundary of Northbank in the 1970s and more
recently along the northern boundary. The fill imported to construct the old and new flood levees was
sourced from the Carrick clay pit; anecdotal information from Council indicated that the fill was clean
A number of potential historical sources of contamination exist at or near the investigation area that may
present a potential risk of soil contamination, in particular the presence of former railways in the
northern part of Northbank, former wool and grain storage and the presence of asbestos in the former
storage sheds
Groundwater monitoring in one well installed at the end of Taroona Street in 2015 (around 130m from
the site) found arsenic and lead concentrations in shallow groundwater (0.5 m depth) above drinking
water levels. All other contaminants were measured below the limit of reporting or marginally detected.
Following the site history review, targeted soil sampling was conducted by pitt&sherry on 30 May 2017 and
identified localised soil contamination within the investigation area. The contamination found was restricted
to benzo(a)pyrene and other carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sample SB1, located
at the entrance of Taroona Street near the new flood gate and near the location of the former railways. The
measured PAH concentrations were lower than the assessment criteria for protection of excavation workers
but higher than the investigation levels for recreational use and ecological protection.
The main pathways of human exposure to benzo(a)pyrene and PAHs are through ingestion, dermal contact
and dust inhalation. Groundwater has not been considered as a potential pathway given the depth of the
proposed excavation and that no water was encountered during sampling. The likelihood of groundwater
underneath the trenches being contaminated with hydrocarbons to such levels that it will pose a risk from
vapour inhalation is considered to be low.
A Conceptual Site Model was developed based on all the information gained to date and the following risk
assessment has been made:
The risk to construction workers during installation of underground services is considered to be low
The risk of exposure to future users of the proposed recreational area is considered to be low, given the
depth of the identified contamination and given that it is located where the Northbank car park is
proposed to be built (paved)
The risk to ecological receptors potentially affected by the contamination (site flora and fauna) is
considered to be low, given the proposed use of the area as a car park with little vegetation of
significance.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
The level of contamination identified in the proposed excavation trenches is not considered to present a risk
to human health or the environment. However, the following recommendations are made based on the level
of contamination:
According to the Tasmanian EPA Information Bulletin No.105, which classifies soil for offsite disposal, the
samples analysed for this investigation would classify the soil in the trenches as Level 1 Fill, with the
exception of the soil at location SB1 (near the new flood gate and the former railways) where the shallow
sample (0-500 mm) would be classified as Level 2 - Low Level Contaminated and the deeper sample
(500-700 mm) would be classified as Level 3 - Contaminated, based on the benzo(a)pyrene
concentrations
It is preferable that all soils are placed back into the trenches after completion of works. However, if off-
site removal of the soil from around location SB1 was required, it would be recommended that the
stockpile is sampled and tested for leachable PAHs to confirm the classification level
It is recommended that the Health and Safety Management for trench construction includes protective
measures to address the potential exposure of construction workers to contaminated soil (including
asbestos). The CEMP for the works should make allowance for the management of soil for offsite
disposal, if required.
13. Important Information

13.1 Scope of services
This report (the Report) has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services set out in the contract,
or as otherwise agreed, between the client and pitt&sherry (the scope of services). In some circumstances
the scope of services may have been limited by a range of factors such as time, budget, access and/or site
disturbance constraints. The Report may only be used and relied on by the client for the purpose set out in
the contract or as otherwise agreed between the client and pitt&sherry. Any use which a third party makes
of this document, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, is the responsibility of such third
parties.
13.2 Reliance on data

In preparing the Report, pitt&sherry has relied upon data, surveys, analyses, designs, plans and other
information provided by the client and other individuals and organisations, most of which are referred to in
the Report (the data). Except as otherwise stated in the Report, pitt&sherry has not verified the accuracy
or completeness of the data. To the extent that the statements, opinions, facts, information, conclusions
and/or recommendations in the Report (conclusions) are based in whole or part on the data, those
conclusions are contingent upon the accuracy and completeness of the data. pitt&sherry does not warrant
the accuracy will not be liable in relation to conclusions should any of the data, be incorrect or have been
concealed, withheld, misrepresented or otherwise not fully disclosed to pitt&sherry.
13.3 Conclusions and recommendations

The conclusions in this Report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of
preparation of the Report. pitt&sherry has no responsibility or obligation to update this Report to account
for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the Report was prepared.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Appendix A
Concept Design for Proposed Development

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
N
STR EET
LIN DSAY
SW
SW
SW
SW
TING
SPS SW
EXIS
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
R
IVE
SW
KR
SW
SW
SW
ES
SW
SW
H
RT
SW
SW 0 10 20 30m
NO
SW
PRELIMINARY
B FOR APPROVAL
SW SW
SW
SW
A INITIAL ISSUE
SW
Stormwater Drainage
SW
Layout Plan
LEGEND:
TA
M AR
SW
RI

VE
T 63 2 479 5600 F 63 2 479 5601

R
PROPOSED SURFACE
OUTFALL PIPELINE
scale 1:1000 for A3 job no. 32-18399
CADASTRAL / PARCEL
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Appendix B
Underground services (Northbank)

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
<Double-click here to enter title>

!
#
#" "
"# !"" "
" "
"#
" "
"
! #
!
! "
"
# " #
#
"
"# !
"
"
!
!"
! # ! #
#
"
"
" ! !
"
reet "
## !
y St
Lindsa
""
! "# ! "
"
"# " "
"
#" !
"
! !
"
"
"
" "
# "
"
! !
"
" # "
Lower Cha
"
""
"
! !
"
! " "
"
"
" "
" " " !

" ""
"
rles Stree
"
"
"
! "
#
" " "
" !
t
"
! "" "
!! "
!!
! #
"
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!
the LIST State of Tasmania
Data sources:
Underground Services - LCC
Legend
Now part of the pitt & sherrygroup
Base image from www.theLIST.tas.gov.au
Sewer man holes Water points Stormwater Water services Launceston City Council
Northbank
(C) State of Tasmania #
"
Base data from www.theLIST.tas.gov.au

(C) State of Tasmania
Stormwater Points Drainage TasGas

!
Underground
File: HB17014R1 RevA

0 0.0075
0.015 0.03 0.045 " Utilities Points Sewer Utilities Map ref H17014R1
Services
Kilometres Revision A
Author ldrummond
Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55
Date 7/03/2017
1:2,360 When Printed at A4
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Appendix C
Historical Aerial Photographs

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Photo 1. 1921
Photo 2. 1955
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Photo 3. March 1971

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Photo 4. April 1976
Photo 5. December 1984

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Photo 6. 1986
Photo 7. December 1991

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Photo 8. March 2002

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Photo 9. March 2009

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Appendix D
Sample Location Plan

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date

God
Gord
Stree
Stree
erich
on
t
t
Kin
g
et
sW
re
ay St
Linds
ha
rf R
oa
d
SB1
Lower Cha
!
SB2
rles Stree
SB3
Lower Ch
!
Taroo
SB4
!
n
!
arles Stre
a Stre
t
e
Esplanad
et
SB5 !
et
SB6
!
River Tamar
Boulevard
North Esk
River
Seaport
lk
Wa
ra
d
xan
Ale
Data sources:
Aerial photo date unknown Legend
Soil samples Launceston City Council

Northbank - ESA
Appendix B
!
0 10 20 40 60 Cadastral parcels
Sample location

Map ref H17014R5
Metres Revision C
plan
Author ldrummond
Date 6/06/2017
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Appendix E
Soil Sampling Results

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Launceston City Council - Northbank Soil Sampling Units LOR HIL - C1 HSL - C2 Direct Contact HSL - IMW4 Direct Contact EIL6 - Urban ESL7 - Urban
for Underground Services Trenches (mg/kg) (mg/kg) HSL-C3 (mg/kg) (mg/kg) HSL-IMW5 Residental and Residental and IB 105 SOIL DISPOSAL CRITERIA (TOTAL
(mg/kg) Public Open Public Open Space CONCENTRATIONS)
SB1-A SB1-B SB2-A SB2-B SB2-C SB3-A SB6-A SB6-B SB3-B SB3-C SB4-A SB4-B SB5-A SB5-B SB5-C Space (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
ALS Reference: EM1706982 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Sample Date: 2/05/2017 Depth (mm) 0-500 500-700 250-500 600-700 500-600 100 100 600 700 300 0-300 600-700 0-300 300-500 500-700 Fill Material Low Level Contaminated
Contaminated
pH (CaCl2) pH unit ---- ---- 5.7 5.7 5.8 ---- ---- ---- ---- 5.7 ---- ---- ---- ---- 4.5 Max mg/kg Max mg/kg Max mg/kg
Clay content (%) % ---- ---- 53 25 14 ---- ---- ---- ---- 48 ---- ---- ---- ---- 47
Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) g/cm3 ---- ---- 2.61 2.61 2.64 ---- ---- ---- ---- 2.52 ---- ---- ---- ---- 2.54
Caiton Exchange Capacity meq/100 g ---- ---- 18.7 9.1 3.1 ---- ---- ---- ---- 18.4 ---- ---- ---- ---- 11.3
EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES

Arsenic mg/kg 5 7 12 <5 5 <5 <5 <5 28 <5 <5 <5 14 <5 11 15 300 100 20 200 750
Barium mg/kg 10 40 50 100 10 20 120 120 30 110 100 80 20 80 20 30 --- 300 3000 30000
Beryllium mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 2 <1 <1 <1 1 <1 <1 <1 90 2 40 400
Boron mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 20,000
Cadmium mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 90 3 40 400
Chromium mg/kg 2 24 38 17 16 8 10 15 58 19 14 16 32 29 24 35 300 408 50 500 5000
Cobalt mg/kg 2 8 9 13 8 6 35 12 13 17 12 15 26 22 4 9 300 100 200 7500
Copper mg/kg 5 34 56 49 8 5 39 43 38 50 44 42 18 31 12 21 17,000 135 100 2000 1000
Iron mg/kg 0.005 ---- ---- 5.25 2.53 1.88 ---- ---- ---- ---- 4.53 ---- ---- ---- ---- 3.05 ---
Lead mg/kg 5 46 64 12 7 24 11 8 34 10 7 8 16 15 13 18 600 1,100 300 1200 3000
Manganese mg/kg 5 226 214 119 224 438 241 136 243 204 101 145 130 227 76 150 19,000 500 5000 25000
Nickel mg/kg 2 16 19 14 10 6 13 14 28 14 14 12 30 11 9 15 1,200 176 60 600 3000
Selenium mg/kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 700 10 50 200
Vanadium mg/kg 5 49 74 116 30 19 128 94 78 167 114 132 41 99 43 60 ---
Zinc mg/kg 5 244 155 42 22 15 17 22 105 23 19 21 65 18 168 232 30,000 285 200 14000 50000
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS

Mercury mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.6 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.1 0.2 80 1 30 110
EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC)

Aldrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 10
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 10
Total Chlordane (sum) mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 70
Endosulfan (sum) mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 340
Endrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 20
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 10
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 10
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 400
Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 400 180 2 200 1000
Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 10 2 20 50
EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP)

Chlorpyrifos mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 250
Criteria exceeded
1- NEPM 1999 (2013) Schedule B1, HIL - Recreational, Table 1A(1), mg/kg
2- NEPM 1999 (2013) Schedule B1, HSL - Recreational, Clay, Table 1A(3), mg/kg
3- CRC Care (2011) Direct Contact HSL-C, Table B(4), mg/kg
4- CRC Care (2011) HSL-Intrusive Maintenance Workers (IMW), Table B(3), mg/kg
5- CRC Care (2011) Direct Contact HSL-IMW, Table B(4), mg/kg
6- NEPM 1999 (2013) Schedule B1, EIL- Urban Residental and Public Open Space, Table 1B(1-5), mg/kg
7- NEPM 1999 (2013) Schedule B1, ESL- Urban Residental and Public Open Space (Fine soils), Table 1B(6), mg/kg
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Contaminated
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Max mg/kg Max mg/kg Max mg/kg
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NL
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Fluorene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5 0.8 2.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1
Anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.6
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 1.8 6.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.6
Pyrene mg/kg 0.5 1.9 6.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.8
Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 1.1 4.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.1
Chrysene mg/kg 0.5 1 4.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9
Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 1.2 6.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 0.6 2.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.8
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 1 5.3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 0.08 2 20
Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 0.6 2.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/kg 0.5 0.8 3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6
Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons mg/kg 0.5 10.8 46.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 8.8 300 20 40 200
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (zero) mg/kg 0.5 1.4 7.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1 3
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (half LOR) mg/kg 0.5 1.6 7.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 3
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (LOR) mg/kg 0.5 1.9 7.8 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 3
EP080: BTEX
Benzene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 NL 120 350 1,100 65
Toluene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NL 18,000 NL 120,000 105
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NL 5,300 NL 85,000 125
meta- & para-Xylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NL NL 45
ortho-Xylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NL NL
Total Xylenes mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NL 15,000 NL 130,000 45
Sum of BTEX mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 NL
Naphthalene mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0 NL 1,900 NL 29,000 170
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

C6 - C9 Fraction mg/kg 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
C10 - C14 Fraction mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <100 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
C15 - C28 Fraction mg/kg 100 230 340 <100 <100 <100 <200 270 110 130 180 <100 <100 <100 <100 190
C29 - C36 Fraction mg/kg 100 210 250 <100 <100 <100 <200 250 170 230 360 <100 <100 <100 130 180
C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) mg/kg 50 440 590 <50 <50 <50 <100 520 280 360 540 <50 <50 <50 130 370
EP071 SG-S: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil - Silica gel cleanup
C10 - C14 Fraction mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
C15 - C28 Fraction mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
C29 - C36 Fraction mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM

2013
C6 Fractions
- C10 Fraction mg/kg 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 NL 5,100 NL 82,000
C6 - C10 Fraction minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 NL 62,000 180
>C10 - C16 Fraction mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 NL 3,800 NL 85,000
>C16 - C34 Fraction mg/kg 100 400 540 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 NL 5,300 120,000 1300
>C34 - C40 Fraction mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 NL 7,400 5600
>C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) mg/kg 50 400 540 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 NL
>C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene (F2) mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 NL 120
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup
>C16 - C34 Fraction mg/kg 100 150 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 NL 3,800 120,000 120
>C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) mg/kg 50 150 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 NL 7,400 2800
>C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene (F2) mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 NL
Criteria exceeded
4- CRC Care (2011) HSL-Intrusive Maintenance Workers (IMW), Shallow Trench 0-2m, Table B(3), mg/kg
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Appendix F
Laboratory Certificates of Analysis

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
0.00
0 True
Environmental
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Work Order : EM1706982 Page : 1 of 18
Client : PITT & SHERRY Laboratory : Environmental Division Melbourne
Contact : DAVID LENEL Contact : Shirley LeCornu
Address : PO BOX 94 199 MACQUARIE ST Address : 4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171
HOBART TAS, AUSTRALIA 7001
Telephone : +61 03 6223 1800 Telephone : +61-3-8549 9630
Project : HB17014 Date Samples Received : 31-May-2017 11:45
Order number : HB7737 Date Analysis Commenced : 01-Jun-2017
C-O-C number : ---- Issue Date : 07-Jun-2017 15:35
Sampler : CAMERON DANIEL
Site : ----
Quote number : ----
No. of samples received : 15
No. of samples analysed : 15
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:
l General Comments
l Analytical Results
l Surrogate Control Limits
Additional information pertinent to this report will be found in the following separate attachments: Quality Control Report, QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with
Quality Review and Sample Receipt Notification.
Signatories
This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
Signatories Position Accreditation Category
Chris Lemaitre Non-Metals Team Leader Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC

Dianne Blane Laboratory Coordinator (2IC) Newcastle - Inorganics, Mayfield West, NSW
Dilani Fernando Senior Inorganic Chemist Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC
Eric Chau Metals Team Leader Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC
Nancy Wang Senior Semivolatile Instrument Chemist Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC
Nancy Wang Senior Semivolatile Instrument Chemist Melbourne Organics, Springvale, VIC
Nikki Stepniewski Senior Inorganic Instrument Chemist Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC
Xing Lin Senior Organic Chemist Melbourne Organics, Springvale, VIC
RIGHT SOLUTIONS | RIGHT PARTNER

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 2 of 18
Work Order : EM1706982

Client : PITT & SHERRY
Project : HB17014
General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
When no sampling time is provided, the sampling time will default 00:00 on the date of sampling. If no sampling date is provided, the sampling date will be assumed by the laboratory and displayed in brackets without a
time component.
Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details.
Key : CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting
= ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests.
~ = Indicates an estimated value.
l Benzo(a)pyrene Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) is the sum total of the concentration of the eight carcinogenic PAHs multiplied by their Toxicity Equivalence Factor (TEF) relative to Benzo(a)pyrene. TEF values
are provided in brackets as follows: Benz(a)anthracene (0.1), Chrysene (0.01), Benzo(b+j) & Benzo(k)fluoranthene (0.1), Benzo(a)pyrene (1.0), Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene (0.1), Dibenz(a.h)anthracene (1.0),
Benzo(g.h.i)perylene (0.01). Less than LOR results for 'TEQ Zero' are treated as zero, for 'TEQ 1/2LOR' are treated as half the reported LOR, and for 'TEQ LOR' are treated as being equal to the reported LOR.
Note: TEQ 1/2LOR and TEQ LOR will calculate as 0.6mg/Kg and 1.2mg/Kg respectively for samples with non-detects for all of the eight TEQ PAHs.
l ED007 and ED008: When Exchangeable Al is reported from these methods, it should be noted that Rayment & Lyons (2011) suggests Exchange Acidity by 1M KCl - Method 15G1 (ED005) is a more suitable method
for the determination of exchange acidity (H+ + Al3+).
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 3 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID SB1-A SB1-B SB2-A SB2-B SB2-C
(Matrix: SOIL)
Client sampling date / time 30-May-2017 12:00 30-May-2017 12:00 30-May-2017 12:45 30-May-2017 12:45 30-May-2017 12:45
Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EM1706982-001 EM1706982-002 EM1706982-003 EM1706982-004 EM1706982-005
Result Result Result Result Result
EA001: pH in soil using 0.01M CaCl extract

pH (CaCl2) ---- 0.1 pH Unit ---- ---- 5.7 5.7 5.8
EA055: Moisture Content

Moisture Content (dried @ 103C) ---- 1 % 17.2 20.9 23.2 30.4 13.6
EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size

Clay (<2 m) ---- 1 % ---- ---- 53 25 14
EA152: Soil Particle Density

Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) ---- 0.01 g/cm3 ---- ---- 2.61 2.61 2.64
ED007: Exchangeable Cations

Exchangeable Calcium ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 8.1 4.3 1.8
Exchangeable Magnesium ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 9.8 3.9 1.0
Exchangeable Potassium ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 0.2 0.4 0.1
Exchangeable Sodium ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 0.6 0.5 <0.1
Cation Exchange Capacity ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 18.7 9.1 3.1

Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg 7 12 <5 5 <5
Barium 7440-39-3 10 mg/kg 40 50 100 10 20
Beryllium 7440-41-7 1 mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Boron 7440-42-8 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 24 38 17 16 8
Cobalt 7440-48-4 2 mg/kg 8 9 13 8 6
Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 34 56 49 8 5
Iron 7439-89-6 0.005 % ---- ---- 5.25 2.53 1.88
Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 46 64 12 7 24
Manganese 7439-96-5 5 mg/kg 226 214 119 224 438
Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 16 19 14 10 6
Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Vanadium 7440-62-2 5 mg/kg 49 74 116 30 19
Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 244 155 42 22 15

Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg 0.2 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 0.1
EP004: Organic Matter

Organic Matter ---- 0.5 % ---- ---- 2.4 2.2 <0.5
Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.5 % ---- ---- 1.4 1.3 <0.5
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 4 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)

alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 118-74-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
gamma-BHC 58-89-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
delta-BHC 319-86-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Aldrin 309-00-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
^ Total Chlordane (sum) ---- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
trans-Chlordane 5103-74-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
alpha-Endosulfan 959-98-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
cis-Chlordane 5103-71-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
4.4`-DDE 72-55-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Endrin 72-20-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
beta-Endosulfan 33213-65-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
^ Endosulfan (sum) 115-29-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
4.4`-DDD 72-54-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Endrin aldehyde 7421-93-4 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Endosulfan sulfate 1031-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
4.4`-DDT 50-29-3 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Endrin ketone 53494-70-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Methoxychlor 72-43-5 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
^ Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin 309-00-2/60-57-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
^ Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT 72-54-8/72-55-9/5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
0-2
Dichlorvos 62-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Demeton-S-methyl 919-86-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Diazinon 333-41-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Chlorpyrifos-methyl 5598-13-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Malathion 121-75-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 5 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)
EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) - Continued

Fenthion 55-38-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Chlorpyrifos 2921-88-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Parathion 56-38-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Pirimphos-ethyl 23505-41-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Bromophos-ethyl 4824-78-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Prothiofos 34643-46-4 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Ethion 563-12-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Carbophenothion 786-19-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Azinphos Methyl 86-50-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
>C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
>C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 150 <100 <100 <100 <100
>C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
^ >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg 150 <50 <50 <50 <50
^ >C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
(F2)
C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg 0.8 2.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg 1.8 6.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg 1.9 6.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg 1.1 4.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg 1.0 4.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 6 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued

Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene 205-99-2 205-82-3 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 6.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 2.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg 1.0 5.3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 2.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg 0.8 3.0 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ---- 0.5 mg/kg 10.8 46.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
^ Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (zero) ---- 0.5 mg/kg 1.4 7.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
^ Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (half LOR) ---- 0.5 mg/kg 1.6 7.8 0.6 0.6 0.6
^ Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (LOR) ---- 0.5 mg/kg 1.9 7.8 1.2 1.2 1.2

C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 230 340 <100 <100 <100
C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 210 250 <100 <100 <100
^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg 440 590 <50 <50 <50
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions

C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 10 mg/kg <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
^ C6 - C10 Fraction minus BTEX C6_C10-BTEX 10 mg/kg <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
(F1)
>C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
>C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 400 540 <100 <100 <100
>C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
^ >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg 400 540 <50 <50 <50
(F2)
EP080: BTEXN
Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 106-42-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
^ Sum of BTEX ---- 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
^ Total Xylenes 1330-20-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Naphthalene 91-20-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 7 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)
EP080: BTEXN - Continued

EP068S: Organochlorine Pesticide Surrogate
Dibromo-DDE 21655-73-2 0.05 % 76.2 86.6 75.9 87.2 98.0
EP068T: Organophosphorus Pesticide Surrogate

DEF 78-48-8 0.05 % 78.9 87.8 88.8 95.0 88.5
EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates

Phenol-d6 13127-88-3 0.5 % 88.2 86.8 91.8 89.4 84.3
2-Chlorophenol-D4 93951-73-6 0.5 % 100 99.5 106 104 97.8
2.4.6-Tribromophenol 118-79-6 0.5 % 55.8 63.7 59.0 60.4 50.2
EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates

2-Fluorobiphenyl 321-60-8 0.5 % 106 104 112 109 100
Anthracene-d10 1719-06-8 0.5 % 114 114 121 117 112
4-Terphenyl-d14 1718-51-0 0.5 % 118 110 126 121 114
EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates

1.2-Dichloroethane-D4 17060-07-0 0.2 % 97.7 87.5 91.9 82.0 84.5
Toluene-D8 2037-26-5 0.2 % 99.0 88.1 87.0 75.4 75.2
4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 0.2 % 115 85.0 80.5 84.7 86.5
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 8 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID SB3-A SB3-B SB3-C SB4-A SB4-B
(Matrix: SOIL)

pH (CaCl2) ---- 0.1 pH Unit ---- ---- 5.7 ---- ----


Clay (<2 m) ---- 1 % ---- ---- 48 ---- ----

Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) ---- 0.01 g/cm3 ---- ---- 2.52 ---- ----

Exchangeable Calcium ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 8.5 ---- ----
Exchangeable Magnesium ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 9.1 ---- ----
Exchangeable Potassium ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 0.3 ---- ----
Exchangeable Sodium ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 0.5 ---- ----
Cation Exchange Capacity ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 18.4 ---- ----

Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 <5 <5 14
Barium 7440-39-3 10 mg/kg 120 110 100 80 20
Beryllium 7440-41-7 1 mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 1
Boron 7440-42-8 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 10 19 14 16 32
Cobalt 7440-48-4 2 mg/kg 35 17 12 15 26
Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 39 50 44 42 18
Iron 7439-89-6 0.005 % ---- ---- 4.53 ---- ----
Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 11 10 7 8 16
Manganese 7439-96-5 5 mg/kg 241 204 101 145 130
Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 13 14 14 12 30
Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Vanadium 7440-62-2 5 mg/kg 128 167 114 132 41
Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 17 23 19 21 65

Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2

Organic Matter ---- 0.5 % ---- ---- 2.6 ---- ----
Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.5 % ---- ---- 1.5 ---- ----
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 9 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)

alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
gamma-BHC 58-89-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
delta-BHC 319-86-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Aldrin 309-00-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
4.4`-DDE 72-55-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Endrin 72-20-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
4.4`-DDD 72-54-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
4.4`-DDT 50-29-3 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
0-2
Dichlorvos 62-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Diazinon 333-41-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Malathion 121-75-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 10 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)

Fenthion 55-38-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Parathion 56-38-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Prothiofos 34643-46-4 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Ethion 563-12-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
>C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
>C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
>C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
^ >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
(F2)
C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 11 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)

Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene 205-99-2 205-82-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ---- 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
^ Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (zero) ---- 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

(F1)
>C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
>C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
>C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
(F2)
EP080: BTEXN
Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
^ Sum of BTEX ---- 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 12 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)

Dibromo-DDE 21655-73-2 0.05 % 99.2 79.6 87.7 84.9 101

DEF 78-48-8 0.05 % 84.4 79.5 95.2 96.7 84.2

Phenol-d6 13127-88-3 0.5 % 86.7 84.7 89.2 84.0 84.6
2-Chlorophenol-D4 93951-73-6 0.5 % 101 97.0 102 96.8 97.4
2.4.6-Tribromophenol 118-79-6 0.5 % 49.6 46.5 50.3 44.1 52.3

2-Fluorobiphenyl 321-60-8 0.5 % 103 104 106 102 101
Anthracene-d10 1719-06-8 0.5 % 115 113 117 114 112
4-Terphenyl-d14 1718-51-0 0.5 % 118 116 120 111 115

Toluene-D8 2037-26-5 0.2 % 77.0 90.6 88.2 81.4 74.3
4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 0.2 % 91.4 102 98.4 91.6 88.6
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 13 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)

pH (CaCl2) ---- 0.1 pH Unit ---- ---- 4.5 ---- ----


Clay (<2 m) ---- 1 % ---- ---- 47 ---- ----

Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) ---- 0.01 g/cm3 ---- ---- 2.54 ---- ----

Exchangeable Calcium ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 6.7 ---- ----
Exchangeable Magnesium ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 3.9 ---- ----
Exchangeable Potassium ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 0.5 ---- ----
Exchangeable Sodium ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 0.1 ---- ----
Cation Exchange Capacity ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- ---- 11.3 ---- ----

Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg <5 11 15 <5 28
Barium 7440-39-3 10 mg/kg 80 20 30 120 30
Beryllium 7440-41-7 1 mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 2
Boron 7440-42-8 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 29 24 35 15 58
Cobalt 7440-48-4 2 mg/kg 22 4 9 12 13
Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 31 12 21 43 38
Iron 7439-89-6 0.005 % ---- ---- 3.05 ---- ----
Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 15 13 18 8 34
Manganese 7439-96-5 5 mg/kg 227 76 150 136 243
Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 11 9 15 14 28
Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Vanadium 7440-62-2 5 mg/kg 99 43 60 94 78
Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 18 168 232 22 105

Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.6

Organic Matter ---- 0.5 % ---- ---- 2.1 ---- ----
Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.5 % ---- ---- 1.2 ---- ----
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 14 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)

alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
gamma-BHC 58-89-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
delta-BHC 319-86-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Aldrin 309-00-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
4.4`-DDE 72-55-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Endrin 72-20-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
4.4`-DDD 72-54-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
4.4`-DDT 50-29-3 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
0-2
Dichlorvos 62-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Diazinon 333-41-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Malathion 121-75-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 15 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)

Fenthion 55-38-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Parathion 56-38-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Prothiofos 34643-46-4 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Ethion 563-12-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
>C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
>C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
>C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
(F2)
C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 16 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)

Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene 205-99-2 205-82-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ---- 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
^ Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (zero) ---- 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

(F1)
>C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
>C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
>C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
(F2)
EP080: BTEXN
Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
^ Sum of BTEX ---- 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 17 of 18

Project : HB17014
Analytical Results
(Matrix: SOIL)

Dibromo-DDE 21655-73-2 0.05 % 84.0 86.0 78.8 86.5 87.7

DEF 78-48-8 0.05 % 82.4 89.2 93.1 110 102

Phenol-d6 13127-88-3 0.5 % 86.5 85.7 83.5 83.9 88.0
2-Chlorophenol-D4 93951-73-6 0.5 % 99.6 101 98.0 96.6 102
2.4.6-Tribromophenol 118-79-6 0.5 % 50.0 50.5 49.0 45.9 54.6

2-Fluorobiphenyl 321-60-8 0.5 % 105 104 101 101 105
Anthracene-d10 1719-06-8 0.5 % 116 114 112 113 117
4-Terphenyl-d14 1718-51-0 0.5 % 121 118 114 116 122

Toluene-D8 2037-26-5 0.2 % 83.3 85.5 79.2 100 78.7
4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 0.2 % 86.4 96.7 88.3 92.4 87.9
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 18 of 18

Project : HB17014
Surrogate Control Limits

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Recovery Limits (%)
Compound CAS Number Low High

Dibromo-DDE 21655-73-2 38 128
DEF 78-48-8 33 139
Phenol-d6 13127-88-3 54 125
2-Chlorophenol-D4 93951-73-6 65 123
2.4.6-Tribromophenol 118-79-6 34 122
2-Fluorobiphenyl 321-60-8 61 125
Anthracene-d10 1719-06-8 62 130
4-Terphenyl-d14 1718-51-0 67 133
1.2-Dichloroethane-D4 17060-07-0 51 125
Toluene-D8 2037-26-5 55 125
4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 56 124
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
8.00 8
Date
False
False
Environmental
QUALITY CONTROL REPORT

Address : PO BOX 94 199 MACQUARIE ST Address : 4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171
HOBART TAS, AUSTRALIA 7001
Project : HB17014 Date Samples Received : 31-May-2017
Order number : HB7737 Date Analysis Commenced : 01-Jun-2017
C-O-C number : ---- Issue Date : 07-Jun-2017
Site : ----
Quote number : ----
No. of samples received : 15
No. of samples analysed : 15
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.
This Quality Control Report contains the following information:
l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report ; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits
l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
l Matrix Spike (MS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
Signatories
This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
Signatories Position Accreditation Category
Chris Lemaitre Non-Metals Team Leader Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC

Dianne Blane Laboratory Coordinator (2IC) Newcastle - Inorganics, Mayfield West, NSW
Dilani Fernando Senior Inorganic Chemist Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC
Eric Chau Metals Team Leader Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC
Nancy Wang Senior Semivolatile Instrument Chemist Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC
Nancy Wang Senior Semivolatile Instrument Chemist Melbourne Organics, Springvale, VIC
Nikki Stepniewski Senior Inorganic Instrument Chemist Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC
Xing Lin Senior Organic Chemist Melbourne Organics, Springvale, VIC

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 2 of 16

Project : HB17014
General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture c
Key : Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
RPD = Relative Percentage Difference
# = Indicates failed QC
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges
for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:
No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%.
Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Original Result Duplicate Result RPD (%) Recovery Limits (%)
EA001: pH in soil using 0.01M CaCl extract (QC Lot: 921525)
EM1706921-001 Anonymous EA001: pH (CaCl2) ---- 0.1 pH Unit 8.7 8.7 0.00 0% - 20%
EM1706990-013 Anonymous EA001: pH (CaCl2) ---- 0.1 pH Unit 7.4 7.3 1.36 0% - 20%
EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 920588)
EM1706955-036 Anonymous EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103C) ---- 1 % 17.0 16.8 0.768 0% - 50%
EM1706982-002 SB1-B EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103C) ---- 1 % 20.9 18.1 14.2 0% - 20%
EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 920589)
EM1706982-012 SB5-B EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103C) ---- 1 % 17.4 17.1 1.82 0% - 50%
EM1706990-002 Anonymous EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103C) ---- 1 % 24.2 28.8 17.4 0% - 20%
ED007: Exchangeable Cations (QC Lot: 921319)
EM1706982-003 SB2-A ED007: Exchangeable Calcium ---- 0.1 meq/100g 8.1 8.1 0.00 0% - 20%
ED007: Exchangeable Magnesium ---- 0.1 meq/100g 9.8 9.8 0.00 0% - 20%
ED007: Exchangeable Potassium ---- 0.1 meq/100g 0.2 0.2 0.00 No Limit
ED007: Exchangeable Sodium ---- 0.1 meq/100g 0.6 0.6 0.00 No Limit
ED007: Cation Exchange Capacity ---- 0.1 meq/100g 18.7 18.7 0.00 0% - 20%
ED008: Exchangeable Cations (QC Lot: 921318)
EM1706982-003 SB2-A ED008: Exchangeable Calcium ---- 0.1 meq/100g 8.1 8.1 0.00 0% - 20%
ED008: Exchangeable Magnesium ---- 0.1 meq/100g 9.8 9.8 0.00 0% - 20%
ED008: Exchangeable Potassium ---- 0.1 meq/100g 0.2 0.2 0.00 No Limit
ED008: Exchangeable Sodium ---- 0.1 meq/100g 0.6 0.6 0.00 No Limit
ED008: Cation Exchange Capacity ---- 0.1 meq/100g 18.7 18.7 0.00 0% - 20%
EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 921372)
EM1706982-002 SB1-B EG005T: Beryllium 7440-41-7 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Barium 7440-39-3 10 mg/kg 50 50 0.00 No Limit
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 3 of 16

Project : HB17014

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 921372) - continued
EM1706982-002 SB1-B EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 38 35 8.04 0% - 50%
EG005T: Cobalt 7440-48-4 2 mg/kg 9 8 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 19 19 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg 12 14 14.2 No Limit
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 56 57 0.00 0% - 50%
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 64 58 9.67 0% - 50%
EG005T: Manganese 7439-96-5 5 mg/kg 214 216 0.826 0% - 20%
EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Vanadium 7440-62-2 5 mg/kg 74 61 19.3 0% - 50%
EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 155 142 9.29 0% - 20%
EG005T: Boron 7440-42-8 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 42100 38800 8.24 0% - 20%
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EG005T: Beryllium 7440-41-7 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 24 35 40.2 0% - 50%
EG005T: Cobalt 7440-48-4 2 mg/kg 8 7 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 34 33 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 46 44 4.02 No Limit
EG005T: Vanadium 7440-62-2 5 mg/kg 49 51 3.93 0% - 50%
EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 244 219 10.8 0% - 20%
EG005T: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 24200 25300 4.31 0% - 20%
EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 921374)
EM1706982-010 SB4-B EG005T: Beryllium 7440-41-7 1 mg/kg 1 <1 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Cobalt 7440-48-4 2 mg/kg 26 28 5.92 0% - 50%
EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 30 30 0.00 0% - 50%
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 18 14 21.2 No Limit
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 16 10 47.1 No Limit
EG005T: Vanadium 7440-62-2 5 mg/kg 41 39 4.70 No Limit
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 4 of 16

Project : HB17014

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 921374) - continued
EM1706982-010 SB4-B EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 65 64 0.00 0% - 50%
EG005T: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 26800 26400 1.58 0% - 20%
EP1705619-007 Anonymous EG005T: Beryllium 7440-41-7 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Cobalt 7440-48-4 2 mg/kg 2 <2 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg <5 <5 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg <5 <5 0.00 No Limit
EG005T: Vanadium 7440-62-2 5 mg/kg 11 10 14.9 No Limit
EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 6 9 39.3 No Limit
EG005T: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 6170 5300 15.1 0% - 20%
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 921373)
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg 0.2 0.2 0.00 No Limit
EM1706982-010 SB4-B EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg 0.2 0.1 69.5 No Limit
EP004: Organic Matter (QC Lot: 926130)
EM1706982-003 SB2-A EP004: Organic Matter ---- 0.5 % 2.4 2.1 11.8 No Limit
EP004: Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.5 % 1.4 1.2 11.7 No Limit
EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) (QC Lot: 920990)
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EP068: alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 118-74-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: gamma-BHC 58-89-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: delta-BHC 319-86-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Aldrin 309-00-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: trans-Chlordane 5103-74-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: alpha-Endosulfan 959-98-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: cis-Chlordane 5103-71-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: 4.4`-DDE 72-55-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Endrin 72-20-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: beta-Endosulfan 33213-65-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 5 of 16

Project : HB17014

EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) (QC Lot: 920990) - continued
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EP068: 4.4`-DDD 72-54-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Endrin aldehyde 7421-93-4 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Endosulfan sulfate 1031-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Endrin ketone 53494-70-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: 4.4`-DDT 50-29-3 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Methoxychlor 72-43-5 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit
EM1706982-011 SB5-A EP068: alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 118-74-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: gamma-BHC 58-89-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: delta-BHC 319-86-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Aldrin 309-00-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: trans-Chlordane 5103-74-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: alpha-Endosulfan 959-98-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: cis-Chlordane 5103-71-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: 4.4`-DDE 72-55-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Endrin 72-20-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: beta-Endosulfan 33213-65-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: 4.4`-DDD 72-54-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Endrin aldehyde 7421-93-4 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Endosulfan sulfate 1031-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Endrin ketone 53494-70-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: 4.4`-DDT 50-29-3 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Methoxychlor 72-43-5 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit
EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) (QC Lot: 920990)
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EP068: Dichlorvos 62-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Demeton-S-methyl 919-86-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Chlorpyrifos-methyl 5598-13-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Malathion 121-75-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Chlorpyrifos 2921-88-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Pirimphos-ethyl 23505-41-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Bromophos-ethyl 4824-78-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 6 of 16

Project : HB17014

EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) (QC Lot: 920990) - continued
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EP068: Prothiofos 34643-46-4 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Ethion 563-12-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Carbophenothion 786-19-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Azinphos Methyl 86-50-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Parathion 56-38-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit
EM1706982-011 SB5-A EP068: Dichlorvos 62-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Demeton-S-methyl 919-86-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Chlorpyrifos-methyl 5598-13-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Malathion 121-75-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Chlorpyrifos 2921-88-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Pirimphos-ethyl 23505-41-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Bromophos-ethyl 4824-78-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Prothiofos 34643-46-4 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Ethion 563-12-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Carbophenothion 786-19-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Azinphos Methyl 86-50-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit
EP068: Parathion 56-38-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup (QC Lot: 920991)
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EP071SG-S: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.00 No Limit
EP071SG-S: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.00 No Limit
EM1706982-011 SB5-A EP071SG-S: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.00 No Limit
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup (QC Lot: 920991)
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EP071SG-S: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 150 140 0.00 No Limit
EP071SG-S: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.00 No Limit
EM1706982-011 SB5-A EP071SG-S: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 920988)
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 7 of 16

Project : HB17014

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 920988) - continued
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg 0.8 0.6 33.6 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg 1.8 1.6 8.55 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg 1.9 1.8 6.54 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg 1.1 1.0 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg 1.0 1.0 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 1.3 0.00 No Limit
205-82-3
EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg 1.0 1.0 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 0.6 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg 0.8 0.8 0.00 No Limit
EM1706982-011 SB5-A EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
205-82-3
EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 920494)
EM1706928-001 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.00 No Limit
EM1706982-005 SB2-C EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.00 No Limit
EM1706968-001 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.00 No Limit
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 230 240 5.32 No Limit
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 8 of 16

Project : HB17014

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 920989) - continued
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 210 230 9.08 No Limit
EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.00 No Limit
EP071: C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg 440 470 6.59 No Limit
EM1706982-011 SB5-A EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.00 No Limit
EP071: C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.00 No Limit
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QC Lot: 920494)
EM1706928-001 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.00 No Limit
EM1706982-005 SB2-C EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.00 No Limit
EM1706968-001 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.00 No Limit
EM1706982-001 SB1-A EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 400 430 6.74 No Limit
EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.00 No Limit
EP071: >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg 400 430 7.23 No Limit
EM1706982-011 SB5-A EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.00 No Limit
EP071: >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.00 No Limit
EP080: BTEXN (QC Lot: 920494)
EM1706928-001 Anonymous EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
106-42-3
EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit
EM1706982-005 SB2-C EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit
EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
106-42-3
EP080: BTEXN (QC Lot: 920512)
EM1706968-001 Anonymous EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 9 of 16

Project : HB17014

EP080: BTEXN (QC Lot: 920512) - continued
EM1706968-001 Anonymous EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit
106-42-3
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 10 of 16

Project : HB17014
Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC
parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target
analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.
Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)
Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Result Concentration LCS Low High
ED007: Exchangeable Cations (QCLot: 921319)

ED007: Exchangeable Calcium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 21.6 meq/100g 89.6 80 120
ED007: Exchangeable Magnesium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 10.5 meq/100g 100 80 120
ED007: Exchangeable Potassium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 1.7 meq/100g 94.0 80 120
ED007: Exchangeable Sodium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 1.33 meq/100g 107 80 120
ED007: Cation Exchange Capacity ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 ---- ---- ---- ----
ED008: Exchangeable Cations (QCLot: 921318)

ED008: Exchangeable Calcium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 21.6 meq/100g 89.6 80 120
ED008: Exchangeable Magnesium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 10.5 meq/100g 100 80 120
ED008: Exchangeable Potassium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 1.7 meq/100g 94.0 80 120
ED008: Exchangeable Sodium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 1.33 meq/100g 107 80 120
ED008: Cation Exchange Capacity ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 ---- ---- ---- ----
EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 921372)

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg <5 21.7 mg/kg 104 79 113
EG005T: Barium 7440-39-3 10 mg/kg <10 143 mg/kg 101 87 114
EG005T: Beryllium 7440-41-7 1 mg/kg <1 5.63 mg/kg 111 77 125
EG005T: Boron 7440-42-8 50 mg/kg <50 33.2 mg/kg 114 84 124
EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 4.64 mg/kg 89.8 85 109
EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg <2 43.9 mg/kg 105 89 113
EG005T: Cobalt 7440-48-4 2 mg/kg <2 16 mg/kg 96.4 81 117
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg <5 32 mg/kg 104 84 116
EG005T: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg <50 8400 mg/kg 101 95 109
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg <5 40 mg/kg 100.0 85 107
EG005T: Manganese 7439-96-5 5 mg/kg <5 130 mg/kg 100 87 113
EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg <2 55 mg/kg 95.5 89 111
EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 5.37 mg/kg 101 93 109
EG005T: Vanadium 7440-62-2 5 mg/kg <5 29.6 mg/kg 95.8 81 117
EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg <5 60.8 mg/kg 100 89 111

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg <5 21.7 mg/kg 108 79 113
EG005T: Barium 7440-39-3 10 mg/kg <10 143 mg/kg 105 87 114
EG005T: Beryllium 7440-41-7 1 mg/kg <1 5.63 mg/kg 116 77 125
EG005T: Boron 7440-42-8 50 mg/kg <50 33.2 mg/kg 114 84 124
EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 4.64 mg/kg 93.2 85 109
EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg <2 43.9 mg/kg 109 89 113
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 11 of 16

Project : HB17014
EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 921374) - continued

EG005T: Cobalt 7440-48-4 2 mg/kg <2 16 mg/kg 100 81 117
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg <5 32 mg/kg 108 84 116
EG005T: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg <50 8400 mg/kg 101 95 109
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg <5 40 mg/kg 104 85 107
EG005T: Manganese 7439-96-5 5 mg/kg <5 130 mg/kg 105 87 113
EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg <2 55 mg/kg 100 89 111
EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 5.37 mg/kg 102 93 109
EG005T: Vanadium 7440-62-2 5 mg/kg <5 29.6 mg/kg 99.7 81 117
EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg <5 60.8 mg/kg 105 89 111
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 921373)

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 2.57 mg/kg 85.5 85 103
EP004: Organic Matter (QCLot: 926130)

EP004: Organic Matter ---- 0.5 % <0.5 77 % 82.7 81 112
EP004: Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.5 % <0.5 43.5 % 84.9 83 114
EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) (QCLot: 920990)

EP068: alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 88.9 45 131
EP068: Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 118-74-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 85.6 45 125
EP068: beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 92.4 46 134
EP068: gamma-BHC 58-89-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 126 49 133
EP068: delta-BHC 319-86-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 96.2 52 128
EP068: Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 78.4 48 128
EP068: Aldrin 309-00-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 85.3 52 128
EP068: Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 85.5 52 130
EP068: trans-Chlordane 5103-74-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 82.3 51 131
EP068: alpha-Endosulfan 959-98-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 97.7 57 135
EP068: cis-Chlordane 5103-71-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 88.5 51 131
EP068: Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 87.0 51 131
EP068: 4.4`-DDE 72-55-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 90.3 51 131
EP068: Endrin 72-20-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 75.4 41 131
EP068: beta-Endosulfan 33213-65-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 94.0 52 132
EP068: 4.4`-DDD 72-54-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 103 50 134
EP068: Endrin aldehyde 7421-93-4 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 77.4 49 130
EP068: Endosulfan sulfate 1031-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 77.4 50 132
EP068: 4.4`-DDT 50-29-3 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 0.5 mg/kg 75.5 38 140
EP068: Endrin ketone 53494-70-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 95.2 64 132
EP068: Methoxychlor 72-43-5 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 0.5 mg/kg 89.7 41 141
EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) (QCLot: 920990)

EP068: Dichlorvos 62-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 89.1 54 135
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 12 of 16

Project : HB17014
EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) (QCLot: 920990) - continued

EP068: Demeton-S-methyl 919-86-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 93.9 51 143
EP068: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 0.5 mg/kg 42.6 10 136
EP068: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 86.7 43 128
EP068: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 98.3 53 131
EP068: Chlorpyrifos-methyl 5598-13-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 93.0 53 131
EP068: Malathion 121-75-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 86.3 51 133
EP068: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 87.9 51 130
EP068: Chlorpyrifos 2921-88-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 93.4 54 130
EP068: Parathion 56-38-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 0.5 mg/kg 81.6 51 135
EP068: Pirimphos-ethyl 23505-41-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 87.0 49 133
EP068: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 83.0 50 134
EP068: Bromophos-ethyl 4824-78-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 88.6 53 131
EP068: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 82.8 46 134
EP068: Prothiofos 34643-46-4 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 90.6 51 133
EP068: Ethion 563-12-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 96.3 51 133
EP068: Carbophenothion 786-19-6 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 84.2 51 133
EP068: Azinphos Methyl 86-50-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 0.5 mg/kg 65.8 14 124
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup (QCLot: 920991)
EP071SG-S: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 751 mg/kg 98.2 57 109
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup (QCLot: 920991)
EP071SG-S: >C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 1135 mg/kg 98.3 59 109
EP071SG-S: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 4080 mg/kg 89.2 58 120
EP071SG-S: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 162 mg/kg 135 52 150
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 920988)

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 113 80 121
EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 96.7 70 130
EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 116 80 120
EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 105 70 124
EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 116 80 122
EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 117 80 126
EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 116 70 128
EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 118 80 125
EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 102 70 130
EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 120 80 126
EP075(SIM): Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 84.6 70 124
205-82-3
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 13 of 16

Project : HB17014
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 920988) - continued

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 96.3 75 125
EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 77.4 65 125
EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 108 65 128
EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 113 65 126
EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 3 mg/kg 111 65 127
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 920494)

EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 36 mg/kg 93.5 70 127

EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 36 mg/kg 89.8 70 127

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 734 mg/kg 129 65 131
EP071: C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 ---- ---- ---- ----
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QCLot: 920494)

EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 10 mg/kg <10 45 mg/kg 93.5 68 125

EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 10 mg/kg <10 45 mg/kg 84.2 68 125

EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 1101 mg/kg 129 68 130
EP071: >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 ---- ---- ---- ----
EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 920494)

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 2 mg/kg 95.9 74 124
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 2 mg/kg 94.5 77 125
EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 2 mg/kg 102 73 125
EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 4 mg/kg 104 77 128
106-42-3
EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 2 mg/kg 111 81 128
EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 1 mg/kg <1 0.5 mg/kg 84.4 66 130

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 2 mg/kg 91.5 74 124
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 2 mg/kg 94.2 77 125
EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 2 mg/kg 91.2 73 125
EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 4 mg/kg 94.7 77 128
106-42-3
EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 2 mg/kg 96.6 81 128
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 14 of 16

Project : HB17014
EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 920512) - continued

EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 1 mg/kg <1 0.5 mg/kg 82.2 66 130
Matrix Spike (MS) Report

The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on
analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.
Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report
Spike SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)

Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number Concentration MS Low High

EM1706956-042 Anonymous EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 50 mg/kg 91.1 78 124
EG005T: Barium 7440-39-3 50 mg/kg 79.8 71 135
EG005T: Beryllium 7440-41-7 50 mg/kg 93.8 85 125
EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 50 mg/kg 98.2 84 116
EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 50 mg/kg 82.2 79 121
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 50 mg/kg 87.0 82 124
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 50 mg/kg 82.8 76 124
EG005T: Manganese 7439-96-5 50 mg/kg 107 68 136
EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 50 mg/kg 81.3 78 120
EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 50 mg/kg 77.7 71 125
EG005T: Vanadium 7440-62-2 50 mg/kg 79.8 76 124
EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 50 mg/kg 84.6 74 128
EM1706982-006 SB3-A EG005T: Manganese 7439-96-5 50 mg/kg 106 68 136
EM1706982-006 SB3-A EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 50 mg/kg 94.6 78 124
EG005T: Barium 7440-39-3 50 mg/kg 86.7 71 135
EG005T: Beryllium 7440-41-7 50 mg/kg 98.8 85 125
EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 50 mg/kg 88.0 84 116
EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 50 mg/kg 91.1 79 121
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 50 mg/kg 91.5 82 124
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 50 mg/kg 82.7 76 124
EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 50 mg/kg 81.3 78 120
EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 50 mg/kg 94.0 71 125
EG005T: Vanadium 7440-62-2 50 mg/kg 85.6 76 124
EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 50 mg/kg 86.0 74 128
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 921373)

EM1706982-006 SB3-A EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 5 mg/kg 90.6 76 116
EP004: Organic Matter (QCLot: 926130)
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 15 of 16

Project : HB17014

EP004: Organic Matter (QCLot: 926130) - continued

EM1706982-004 SB2-B EP004: Organic Matter ---- 77 % 83.8 70 120
EP004: Total Organic Carbon ---- 43.5 % 83.8 70 120
EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) (QCLot: 920990)

EM1706982-002 SB1-B EP068: gamma-BHC 58-89-9 0.5 mg/kg 85.6 22 139
EP068: Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.5 mg/kg 71.0 18 130
EP068: Aldrin 309-00-2 0.5 mg/kg 66.5 23 136
EP068: Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.5 mg/kg 96.7 42 136
EP068: Endrin 72-20-8 0.5 mg/kg 101 23 146
EP068: 4.4`-DDT 50-29-3 0.5 mg/kg 68.0 20 133
EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) (QCLot: 920990)
EM1706982-002 SB1-B EP068: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.5 mg/kg 90.9 49 135
EP068: Chlorpyrifos-methyl 5598-13-0 0.5 mg/kg 82.3 41 127
EP068: Pirimphos-ethyl 23505-41-1 0.5 mg/kg 80.2 47 133
EP068: Bromophos-ethyl 4824-78-6 0.5 mg/kg 74.3 45 133
EP068: Prothiofos 34643-46-4 0.5 mg/kg 84.0 40 128
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup (QCLot: 920991)
EM1706982-003 SB2-A EP071SG-S: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 751 mg/kg 101 56 110
EP071SG-S: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 3103 mg/kg 98.1 57 107
EP071SG-S: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 1482 mg/kg 104 62 112
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup (QCLot: 920991)
EM1706982-003 SB2-A EP071SG-S: >C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 1135 mg/kg 101 57 109
EP071SG-S: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 4080 mg/kg 94.7 59 113
EP071SG-S: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 162 mg/kg 86.1 68 144
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 920988)

EM1706715-005 Anonymous EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 3 mg/kg 94.2 67 117
EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 3 mg/kg 114 52 148

EM1706928-002 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 28 mg/kg 60.3 42 131

EM1706968-003 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 28 mg/kg 85.7 42 131

EM1706715-004 Anonymous EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 734 mg/kg 120 53 123
EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 3091 mg/kg 104 70 124
EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 1507 mg/kg 111 64 118
EM1706928-002 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 33 mg/kg 59.3 39 129
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page : 16 of 16

Project : HB17014


EM1706968-003 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 33 mg/kg 81.2 39 129

EM1706715-004 Anonymous EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 1101 mg/kg 121 65 123
EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 3914 mg/kg 108 67 121
EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 283 mg/kg 101 44 126
EM1706928-002 Anonymous EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 2 mg/kg 82.5 50 136
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 2 mg/kg 81.5 56 139

EM1706968-003 Anonymous EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 2 mg/kg 98.5 50 136
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 2 mg/kg 102 56 139
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
True
Environmental
QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality Review

Contact : DAVID LENEL Telephone : +61-3-8549 9630
Project : HB17014 Date Samples Received : 31-May-2017
Site : ---- Issue Date : 07-Jun-2017
Sampler : CAMERON DANIEL No. of samples received : 15
Order number : HB7737 No. of samples analysed : 15
This report is automatically generated by the ALS LIMS through interpretation of the ALS Quality Control Report and several Quality Assurance parameters measured by ALS. This automated
reporting highlights any non-conformances, facilitates faster and more accurate data validation and is designed to assist internal expert and external Auditor review. Many components of this
report contribute to the overall DQO assessment and reporting for guideline compliance.
Brief method summaries and references are also provided to assist in traceability.
Summary of Outliers
Outliers : Quality Control Samples
This report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report.
l NO Method Blank value outliers occur.
l NO Duplicate outliers occur.
l NO Laboratory Control outliers occur.
l NO Matrix Spike outliers occur.
l For all regular sample matrices, NO surrogate recovery outliers occur.
Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance

l NO Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist.
Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples

l NO Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page
: 2 of 10

Project : HB17014
Analysis Holding Time Compliance

If samples are identified below as having been analysed or extracted outside of recommended holding times, this should be taken into consideration when interpreting results.
This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with ALS recommended holding times (referencing USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container
provided. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein.
Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics
14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.
Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and
should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern.
Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: = Holding time breach ; = Within holding time.
Method Sample Date Extraction / Preparation Analysis
Container / Client Sample ID(s) Date extracted Due for extraction Evaluation Date analysed Due for analysis Evaluation

Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA001)
06-Jun-2017 05-Jun-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B, 30-May-2017 05-Jun-2017 05-Jun-2017
SB2-C, SB3-C,
SB5-C
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA055-103)
---- ---- 13-Jun-2017
SB1-A, SB1-B, 30-May-2017 ---- 01-Jun-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
Snap Lock Bag (EA150H)
---- ---- 26-Nov-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B, 30-May-2017 ---- 06-Jun-2017
SB2-C, SB3-C,
SB5-C
Snap Lock Bag (EA152)
---- ---- 26-Nov-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B, 30-May-2017 ---- 06-Jun-2017
SB2-C, SB3-C,
SB5-C
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (ED007)
27-Jun-2017 27-Jun-2017
SB2-C, SB3-C
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (ED008)
27-Jun-2017 27-Jun-2017
SB5-C 30-May-2017 01-Jun-2017 05-Jun-2017
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page
: 3 of 10

Project : HB17014


Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG005T)
26-Nov-2017 26-Nov-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG035T)
27-Jun-2017 27-Jun-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP004)
27-Jun-2017 27-Jun-2017
SB2-C, SB3-C,
SB5-C
13-Jun-2017 12-Jul-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page
: 4 of 10

Project : HB17014


13-Jun-2017 12-Jul-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP071SG-S)
13-Jun-2017 12-Jul-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP071SG-S)
13-Jun-2017 12-Jul-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP075(SIM))
13-Jun-2017 12-Jul-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page
: 5 of 10

Project : HB17014


13-Jun-2017 13-Jun-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
13-Jun-2017 12-Jul-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
13-Jun-2017 13-Jun-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
13-Jun-2017 12-Jul-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page
: 6 of 10

Project : HB17014

EP080: BTEXN
13-Jun-2017 13-Jun-2017
SB2-A, SB2-B,
SB2-C, SB3-A,
SB3-B, SB3-C,
SB4-A, SB4-B,
SB5-A, SB5-B,
SB5-C, SB6-A,
SB6-B
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page
: 7 of 10

Project : HB17014
Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance

The following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(were) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to
the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.
Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; = Quality Control frequency within specification.
Quality Control Sample Type Count Rate (%) Quality Control Specification
Analytical Methods Method QC Regular Actual Expected Evaluation
Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)

Exchangeable Cations 1 4 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
ED007 25.00 10.00
Exchangeable Cations with pre-treatment 1 1 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
ED008 100.00 10.00
Moisture Content 4 39 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
EA055-103 10.26 10.00
Organic Matter 1 8 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
EP004 12.50 10.00
PAH/Phenols (SIM) 2 20 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
EP075(SIM) 10.00 10.00
Pesticides by GCMS 2 15 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
EP068 13.33 10.00
pH in soil using a 0.01M CaCl2 extract 2 20 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
EA001 10.00 10.00
Total Mercury by FIMS 2 20 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
EG035T 10.00 10.00
Total Metals by ICP-AES 4 35 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
EG005T 11.43 10.00
TRH - Semivolatile Fraction 2 19 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
EP071 10.53 10.00
TRH - Semivolatile Fraction (Silica Gel Clean Up) 2 15 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
EP071SG-S 13.33 10.00
TRH Volatiles/BTEX 3 30 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
EP080 10.00 10.00
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)
ED007 25.00 5.00
ED008 100.00 5.00
EP004 12.50 5.00
EP075(SIM) 5.00 5.00
EP068 6.67 5.00
EG035T 5.00 5.00
EG005T 5.71 5.00
EP071 5.26 5.00
EP071SG-S 6.67 5.00
EP080 6.67 5.00
Method Blanks (MB)
ED007 25.00 5.00
ED008 100.00 5.00
EP004 12.50 5.00
EP075(SIM) 5.00 5.00
EP068 6.67 5.00
EG035T 5.00 5.00
EG005T 5.71 5.00
EP071 5.26 5.00
EP071SG-S 6.67 5.00
EP080 6.67 5.00
Matrix Spikes (MS)
EP004 12.50 5.00
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page
: 8 of 10

Project : HB17014
Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; = Quality Control frequency within specification.
Quality Control Sample Type Count Rate (%) Quality Control Specification
Analytical Methods Method QC Regular Actual Expected Evaluation
Matrix Spikes (MS) - Continued

EP075(SIM) 5.00 5.00
EP068 6.67 5.00
EG035T 5.00 5.00
EG005T 8.57 5.00
EP071 5.26 5.00
EP071SG-S 6.67 5.00
EP080 6.67 5.00
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page
: 9 of 10

Project : HB17014
Brief Method Summaries

The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the
Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.
Analytical Methods Method Matrix Method Descriptions
pH in soil using a 0.01M CaCl2 extract EA001 SOIL In house: Referenced to Rayment and Higginson 4B1 (mod.) 10 g of soil is mixed with 50 mL of 0.01M CaCl2
and tumbled end over end for 1 hour. pH is measured from the continuous suspension. This method is
compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 103)
Moisture Content EA055-103 SOIL In house: A gravimetric procedure based on weight loss over a 12 hour drying period at 103-105 degrees C.
This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Section 7.1 and Table 1 (14 day holding time).
Particle Size Analysis by Hydrometer EA150H SOIL Particle Size Analysis by Hydrometer according to AS1289.3.6.3 - 2003
Soil Particle Density * EA152 SOIL Soil Particle Density by AS 1289.3.5.1-2006 : Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes - Soil
classification tests - Determination of the soil particle density of a soil - Standard method
Exchangeable Cations ED007 SOIL In house: Referenced to Rayment & Lyons (2011) Method 15A1. Cations are exchanged from the sample by
contact with Ammonium Chloride. They are then quantitated in the final solution by ICPAES and reported as
meq/100g of original soil. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 301)
Exchangeable Cations with ED008 SOIL In house: Referenced to Rayment & Higginson (2011) Method 15A2. Soluble salts are removed from the sample
pre-treatment prior to analysis. Cations are exchanged from the sample by contact with Ammonium Chloride. They are then
quantitated in the final solution by ICPAES and reported as meq/100g of original soil. This method is compliant
with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 301)
Total Metals by ICP-AES EG005T SOIL In house: Referenced to APHA 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010. Metals are determined following an appropriate
acid digestion of the soil. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma, emitting a characteristic
spectrum based on metals present. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix
matched standards. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Total Mercury by FIMS EG035T SOIL In house: Referenced to AS 3550, APHA 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCl2) (Cold Vapour generation) AAS)
FIM-AAS is an automated flameless atomic absorption technique. Mercury in solids are determined following an
appropriate acid digestion. Ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCl2 which is then
purged into a heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration curve. This
method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Organic Matter EP004 SOIL In house: Referenced to AS1289.4.1.1 - 1997. Dichromate oxidation method after Walkley and Black. This
method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3).
Pesticides by GCMS EP068 SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS and quantification is
by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This technique is compliant with NEPM (2013)
Schedule B(3) (Method 504,505)
TRH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071 SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8015A Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/FID and
quantified against alkane standards over the range C10 - C40. Compliant with NEPM amended 2013.
TRH - Semivolatile Fraction (Silica Gel EP071SG-S SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8015A. Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/FID and
Clean Up) quantified against alkane standards over the range C10 - C40. Compliant with NEPM amended 2013.
PAH/Phenols (SIM) EP075(SIM) SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8270D. Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS in Selective Ion
Mode (SIM) and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is
compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 502 and 507)
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Page
: 10 of 10

Project : HB17014
Analytical Methods Method Matrix Method Descriptions

TRH Volatiles/BTEX EP080 SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8260B. Extracts are analysed by Purge and Trap, Capillary GC/MS.
Quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. Compliant with NEPM
amended 2013.
Preparation Methods Method Matrix Method Descriptions
pH in soil using a 0.01M CaCl2 extract EA001-PR SOIL In house: Referenced to Rayment and Higginson 4B1, 10 g of soil is mixed with 50 mL of 0.01M CaCl2 and
tumbled end over end for 1 hour. pH is measured from the continuous suspension. This method is compliant
with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 103)
Exchangeable Cations Preparation ED007PR SOIL In house: Referenced to Rayment & Higginson (1992) method 15A1. A 1M NH4Cl extraction by end over end
Method tumbling at a ratio of 1:20. There is no pretreatment for soluble salts. Extracts can be run by ICP for cations.
Hot Block Digest for metals in soils EN69 SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA 200.2. Hot Block Acid Digestion 1.0g of sample is heated with Nitric and
sediments and sludges Hydrochloric acids, then cooled. Peroxide is added and samples heated and cooled again before being filtered
and bulked to volume for analysis. Digest is appropriate for determination of selected metals in sludge,
sediments, and soils. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 202)
Organic Matter EP004-PR SOIL In house: Referenced to AS1289.4.1.1 - 1997. Dichromate oxidation method after Walkley and Black. This
method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 105)
Methanolic Extraction of Soils for Purge ORG16 SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 5030A. 5g of solid is shaken with surrogate and 10mL methanol prior
and Trap to analysis by Purge and Trap - GC/MS.
Tumbler Extraction of Solids ORG17 SOIL In house: Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 10g of sample, Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 30mL 1:1
DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is decanted, dehydrated and concentrated (by KD) to the
desired volume for analysis.
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Environmental
SAMPLE RECEIPT NOTIFICATION (SRN)
Address : PO BOX 94 199 MACQUARIE ST Address : 4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia
HOBART TAS, AUSTRALIA 7001 3171
E-mail : dlenel@pittsh.com.au E-mail : shirley.lecornu@Alsglobal.com
Facsimile : +61 03 6223 1299 Facsimile : +61-3-8549 9601
Project : HB17014 Page : 1 of 2

Order number : HB7737 Quote number : ----
C-O-C number : ---- QC Level : NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
Site : ----
Dates
Date Samples Received : 31-May-2017 11:45 Issue Date : 31-May-2017
: 07-Jun-2017 Scheduled Reporting Date
Client Requested Due : 07-Jun-2017
Date
Delivery Details
Mode of Delivery : Carrier Security Seal : Intact.
No. of coolers/boxes : 1 Temperature : 2.6C - Ice Bricks present
Receipt Detail : No. of samples received / analysed : 15 / 15
General Comments
l This report contains the following information:
- Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances
- Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis
- Proactive Holding Time Report
- Requested Deliverables
l Please direct any queries related to sample condition / numbering / breakages to Client Services.
l Sample Disposal - Aqueous (14 days), Solid (60 days) from date of completion of work order.
l Analytical work for this work order will be conducted at ALS Springvale & ALS Newcastle.
l Please refer to the Proactive Holding Time Report table below which summarises breaches of
recommended holding times that have occurred prior to samples/instructions being received at
the laboratory. The absence of this summary table indicates that all samples have been received
within the recommended holding times for the analysis requested.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Issue Date 31-May-2017

:
Page : 2 of 2
Work Order : EM1706982 Amendment 0
Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances

All comparisons are made against pretreatment/preservation AS, APHA, USEPA standards.
l No sample container / preservation non-compliance exists.
Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis

Some items described below may be part of a laboratory
process necessary for the execution of client requested
tasks. Packages may contain additional analyses, such
15 Metals (NEPM 2013 Suite - incl. Digestion)

as the determination of moisture content and preparation
tasks, that are included in the package.
If no sampling time is provided, the sampling time will
default 00:00 on the date of sampling. If no sampling date
Soil Characterisation Package

is provided, the sampling date will be assumed by the
TRH Silica Gel Clean Up
TRH/BTEXN/PAH (SIM)
laboratory and displayed in brackets without a time
component
SOIL - EP071SG-S
SOIL - P-22 (Melb)

SOIL - EA055-103
OC/OP Pesticides
Moisture Content
Matrix: SOIL
SOIL - S-03
SOIL - S-07
SOIL - S-12
Laboratory sample Client sampling Client sample ID
ID date / time
EM1706982-001 30-May-2017 12:00 SB1-A
EM1706982-002 30-May-2017 12:00 SB1-B
EM1706982-003 30-May-2017 12:45 SB2-A
EM1706982-004 30-May-2017 12:45 SB2-B
EM1706982-005 30-May-2017 12:45 SB2-C
EM1706982-006 30-May-2017 13:15 SB3-A
EM1706982-007 30-May-2017 13:15 SB3-B
EM1706982-008 30-May-2017 13:15 SB3-C
EM1706982-009 30-May-2017 14:00 SB4-A
EM1706982-010 30-May-2017 14:00 SB4-B
EM1706982-011 30-May-2017 14:20 SB5-A
EM1706982-012 30-May-2017 14:20 SB5-B
EM1706982-013 30-May-2017 14:20 SB5-C
EM1706982-014 30-May-2017 14:45 SB6-A
EM1706982-015 30-May-2017 14:45 SB6-B
Proactive Holding Time Report

Sample(s) have been received within the recommended holding times for the requested analysis.
Requested Deliverables
DAVID LENEL
- *AU Certificate of Analysis - NATA (COA) Email dlenel@pittsh.com.au
- *AU Interpretive QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QCI Rep) (QCI) Email dlenel@pittsh.com.au
- *AU QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QC Rep) - NATA (QC) Email dlenel@pittsh.com.au
- A4 - AU Sample Receipt Notification - Environmental HT (SRN) Email dlenel@pittsh.com.au
- A4 - AU Tax Invoice (INV) Email dlenel@pittsh.com.au
- Attachment - Report (SUBCO) Email dlenel@pittsh.com.au
- Chain of Custody (CoC) (COC) Email dlenel@pittsh.com.au
- EDI Format - ENMRG (ENMRG) Email dlenel@pittsh.com.au
SOPHIE LE ROUX
- *AU Certificate of Analysis - NATA (COA) Email sleroux@pittsh.com.au
- *AU Interpretive QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QCI Rep) (QCI) Email sleroux@pittsh.com.au
- *AU QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QC Rep) - NATA (QC) Email sleroux@pittsh.com.au
- A4 - AU Sample Receipt Notification - Environmental HT (SRN) Email sleroux@pittsh.com.au
- Attachment - Report (SUBCO) Email sleroux@pittsh.com.au
- Chain of Custody (CoC) (COC) Email sleroux@pittsh.com.au
- EDI Format - ENMRG (ENMRG) Email sleroux@pittsh.com.au
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Contact
Dr Sophie LeRoux
03 6210 1465
sleroux@pittsh.com.au
transport | community | mining | industrial | food & beverage | carbon & energy
Brisbane Hobart Newcastle E: info@pittsh.com.au

Level 2 199 Macquarie Street Level 1
W: www.pittsh.com.au
276 Edward Street GPO Box 94 81 Hunter Street
Brisbane QLD 4000 Hobart TAS 7001 Newcastle NSW 2300 incorporated as
T: (07) 3221 0080 T: (03) 6210 1400 T: (02) 4910 3600 Pitt & Sherry (Operations) Pty Ltd
F: (07) 3221 0083 F: (03) 6223 1299 ABN 67 140 184 309
Sydney
Canberra Launceston Suite 902, Level 9,
PO Box 3124 Level 4 1-5 Railway Street
Manuka ACT 2603 113 Cimitiere Street Chatswood NSW 2067
T: 1300 748 874 PO Box 1409 PO Box 5487
Launceston TAS 7250 West Chatswood NSW 1515
Devonport T: (03) 6323 1900 T: (02) 9468 9300
Level 1 F: (03) 6334 4651
35 Oldaker Street
PO Box 836
Devonport TAS 7310 Melbourne
T: (03) 6424 1641 Level 1, HWT Tower
F: (03) 6424 9215 40 City Road
Southbank VIC 3006
PO Box 259
South Melbourne VIC 3205
T: (03) 9682 5290
F: (03) 9682 5292

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
North Bank Redevelopment

Construction Environmental Management Plan
Service Trenching Works
transport | community | mining | industrial | food & beverage | energy
Prepared for: Launceston City Council
Client representative: Jade Kay
Date: 19 June 2017

Rev 00

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Table of Contents
1. Background ....................................................................................................................................1
2. Project Description..........................................................................................................................2
2.1 Construction Expected Timeframes .......................................................................................2
2.2 Construction Methodology & Materials .................................................................................2
2.3 Operating Hours...................................................................................................................2
3. Legislative requirements..................................................................................................................2
4. Water.............................................................................................................................................2
5. Vegetation......................................................................................................................................3
6. Soils ...............................................................................................................................................3
7. Surrounding land uses .....................................................................................................................4
8. Operational Requirements...............................................................................................................5
9. Summary of Mitigation Measures ....................................................................................................5
List of figures
Figure 1 Locality plan ...............................................................................................................................1
List of tables
Table 1 Weeds and other introduced species observed on site ...................................................................3
Table 2 Summary of mitigation measures..................................................................................................5
Appendices
Appendix A: Plan of trench locations
Appendix B: Weed Management Plan
Appendix C: Soil sampling plan and results
Appendix D: Acid Sulphate Soils Management Plan
Prepared by: Date: 19 June 2017

Leigh Knight
Reviewed by: Date: 19 June 2017

David Lenel
Authorised by: Date: 19 June 2017

David Lenel
pitt&sherry ref: HB17014 31P CEMP Rev 00.docx/LK/DL

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Revision History
Rev
Description Prepared by Reviewed by Authorised by Date
No.
A Draft report LK DL DL 08.06.2017
00 Final report LK DL DL 19.06.2017
2017 pitt&sherry
This document is and shall remain the property of pitt&sherry. The document may only be used for the purposes for
which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of
this document in any form is prohibited.
pitt&sherry ref: HB17014 31P CEMP Rev 00.docx/LK/DL

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
1. Background
City of Launceston (Council) is redeveloping former industrial land located on the northern bank of the North
Esk River at Invermay. The site forms part of the proposed North Bank recreation precinct which will
ultimately include the adjoining land containing the Boral concrete batching plant. The site is identified in
Figure 1.
pitt&sherry was engaged by Council to prepare an Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to support a
development application for aspects of the redevelopment. The ESA included a review of historical land uses
and determined that a number of potential sources of contamination existed across the North Bank site. The
site has been extensively disturbed in the past and contains no native vegetation. No mature trees are
present on site. The ground is uneven with the south-western segment being lower than the balance of the
site and holding some standing water.
This Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) has been prepared to identify potential risks
associated with earthworks required to provide services across the site, and to outline measures to avoid or
mitigate potential impacts.
Figure 1 Locality plan
pitt&sherry ref: CEMP/LK/DL 1

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
2. Project Description
The works proposed involve the digging of trenches for the installation of services including water and
electricity. A plan showing the location of the trenches required is provided in Appendix A. Trenches will be
600-700 mm deep and will extend in to the site from Lindsay St along the current Taroona St alignment,
branching off to the east and the west midway along the main trench.
2.1 Construction Expected Timeframes

Works will occur over a relatively short timeframe and are expected to be completed by 31 August 2017.
2.2 Construction Methodology & Materials

Trenches will be dug using an excavator. Material will be placed beside the trench for re -instatement
following installation of services.
2.3 Operating Hours

Works will generally be undertaken during the following hours:
Monday to Friday: 7am to 6pm
3. Legislative requirements
A development application is to be submitted for Council approval and works will be required to be
conducted in accordance with the planning permit issued and the DA documentation. No approvals under
the Environmental Management and Pollution Control Act 1994 are considered necessary as no significant
environmental impacts are likely to result from the proposed works. The following additional legislative
requirements may apply:
a permit to take may be required under the Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 if threatened plants
are to be disturbed by the proposed works
declared weeds are required to be managed in accordance with the Weed Management Act 1999.
4. Water
The site is located at the confluence of the North Esk River with the South Esk and Tamar Rivers. A flood levee
extends around the site to protect Invermay from inundation. There is a drain which runs around the site at
the toe of the levee which contained extensive vegetation at the time of reporting. There was free standing
stormwater on site with shallow dish drains present alongside the bitumen road. There is no public
stormwater infrastructure shown in this portion of the site on the List mapping, and those services in Lindsay
St are identified as gravity mains. These are higher than the site and are unlikely to offer any service to the
development.
Digging of trenches for service installation is unlikely to have significant impacts on water within or adjoining
the site. The trench locations are not near the drain surrounding the site and there is limited potential for
any surface run-off to enter this drain or the river. If soils are very wet at the time of excavation, some
leachate may run from spoil but this is unlikely to travel a sufficient distance to reach the drain and/or river.
The trenches are unlikely to stay open long enough to fill with sufficient water to warrant pumping out.
Given the relatively limited duration of the works and the separation between the trenches and any water
sources, it is not considered that any special measures are required to minimise or mitigate impacts.
Implementation of standard erosion and sediment control measures, including si lt mesh and diversion bunds
if trenches are to remain open for extended periods, will ensure any mobilised sediments do not cause any
environmental nuisance.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
No refuelling will be occurring on site and the activities proposed are not considered to have the potential
for the release of fuels or other pollutants. No special precautions are considered necessary.
5. Vegetation
The vegetation on site is non-native, mapped as Agricultural, urban and exotic in TASVEG 3.0. The List
mapping contains a record for two threatened flora species within the large lot that includes the site of the
works. These were sea clubsedge (Bolboschoenus caldwellii) and river clubsedge (Schoenoplectus
tabernaemontani). It is likely however that these species were observed within riparian vegetation on the
river side of the levee with river clubsedge recorded during the flora and fauna assessment conducted for
the pedestrian bridge near the rowing club (City of Launceston 2017). Any disturbance of threatened plants
is considered unlikely however will require a permit to take if required.
Non-native species were observed on site including a number of declared and non-declared / environmental
weeds outlined in Table 1. The balance was a mix of non-native grasses and herbaceous plants. Blackberry, a
declared weed, is growing along the fence around the Boral site while the cumbungi is restricted to the drain.
The cotoneaster is also restricted to the Boral fence, with a small infestation at the south-western corner of
the fence. Scotch-thistles were observed over the south-western portion of the site with the umbrella sedge
most dense along the road edge. The willow-leaf fleabane was widespread across the site.
Table 1 Weeds and other introduced species observed on site
Scientific name Common name Status

Rubus fruticosus Blackberry Declared
Weed of National Significance
Cirsium vulgare Scotch thistle Non-declared / Environmental
Cotoneaster sp. Cotoneaster Non-declared / Environmental
Cyperus eragrostis Umbrella sedge Introduced
Erigeron bonariensis Willow-leaf Fleabane Introduced
Rumex sp. Curled dock Non-declared / Environmental
Typha latifolia Broad-leaf cumbungi Non-declared / Environmental
The trenching works are unlikely to impact the blackberry on site however the landowner can be directed to
take action to control or eradicate the weed under the Weed Management Act 1999. Any clearing for
trenching should ensure other weeds disturbed are disposed of appropriately and not placed in any mulching
facilities. It is noted that Council has prepared a weed management plan for the North Bank site and any
works should be carried out in accordance with that plan.
6. Soils
The history of development and use across the site means that soils are unlikely to be reflective of original
sediments. The area is alluvial in nature and is comprised of estuarine deposits. Some fill material has been
imported to the site and various land uses may have resulted in contamination of soils on site. Material placed
between Taroona St and the Boral site includes obvious concrete rubble and road pavement material. Other
surface soils included very heavy clay soils, particularly along the central bitumen road. Some litter has been
dumped at the end of the road.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Sampling and testing of soils was undertaken by pitt&sherry in May 2017 along the location of the proposed
trenches1. The results show that a localised area of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
contamination was found at sampling location SB1, near the flood gate (refer to Appendix C).
The risk assessment undertaken as part of the environmental site assessment ( pitt&sherry, 2017)
determined that the risk to excavation workers and future recreational users from exposure to the identified
contamination was low, particularly as the area around SB1 is proposed to be used as a sealed car park.
It is therefore recommended that the excavated soil is placed back into the trenches after instal lation of
underground services.
However, disturbance of contaminated soils has the potential to expose workers on site and on the adjacent
sites to airborne particulates. Dust could be created if material dug from trenches is allowed to dry out during
installation of services. Exposed filled trenches are also potential dust sources. The trench areas are relatively
small dust sources in the context of the whole site (and the Boral site to the east) and potential hazards are
considered to be limited to those faced by workers in the immediate vicinity of the works. Overall risks can
be reduced by returning excavated material to the trenches as soon as possible after installation preventing
excessive drying out. Risks to workers can be lowered through the use of appropriate personal protective
equipment (PPE) during works such as protective clothing, eye wear and face masks when conditions require.
An operational Workplace Health and Safety (WHS) Plan is to be prepared and implemented. The WHS Plan
should include the potential presence of asbestos in soils.
If soil excavated from around sampling location SB1 could not be placed back in the excavation after
trenching, the soil would have to be considered contaminated for off -site disposal purposes (Level 2/Level
3) 2. Management and transport of the soil would have to be subject to EPA approvals. Disposal of
contaminated materials must be to an approved facility. It would be recommended that the stockpiled soil
is sampled and analysed for leachable contaminants to confirm the classification level.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are known to have low mobility in the environment, therefore any leachate
from stockpiled material is unlikely to be contaminated.
Land on the edge of the river is mapped as having a High (greater than 70%) probability of occurrence of acid
sulfate soils (ASS). This is generally land on the river side of (and under) the levee however does extend
landward further to the east of the site (across Boral and the rowing club site). Land subject to the trenching
works are mapped as having a Low (6-70%) probability of occurrence of ASS. The site has an elevation of
below 5 m AHD.
There is limited potential for disturbance of acid sulfate soils due to the location and depth of the proposed
trenches. Council has prepared an Acid Sulfate Soils management plan for the North Bank site which is to be
implemented throughout the duration of works.
The soils on site are predominantly alluvial in origin and comprised of fine clays, silts and sands. Small areas
are to be disturbed for the trenches however these are located well clear of any water sources. There is
limited potential for any mobilised soils to enter watercourses or the drain on site however implementation
of standard erosion and sedimentation control measures will slow flows and filter any run-off.
7. Surrounding land uses

The proposed works are located at the confluence of the North Esk and South Esk Rivers with the Tamar River
and is joined on the south west and south by water. Land to the west is occupied by the disused grain silos
1 Environmental Site Asssessment Installation of Underground Services, Northbank Redevelopment. pitt&sherry (June
2017)
2 EPA Information Bulletin No.105. Classification and Management of Contaminated Soil for Disposal.

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
which are currently being converted into residential apartments. Land to the east is occupied by the Boral
concrete batching plant. Land to the north is vacant land while land to the north east contains the Bunnings
/ Office Works complex. There are currently no sensitive uses adjoining the site however there are sites either
side where workers are present on a daily basis. The Seaport development is located on the southern side of
the river however is separated from the site of the works by the Boral plant. Houses on Home Point Parade
are in excess of 250 m from the proposed trenching areas.
The works will be conducted using small earthmoving equipment and will be completed in a relatively short
period of time. The site of the works is immediately adjacent the Boral plant which is a consistent noise
source during operating hours. The noise generated by an excavator for trench construction would not be
distinguishable from the noise generated by machinery and vehicles on the Boral plant in terms of volume or
duration. The works will not result in any ongoing disturbance of adjoining land users beyond those currently
resulting from the Boral site. The apartment development to the west is still under construction and there
are no other sensitive uses which are likely to be impacted by noise generated by the works. No special
control or mitigation measures are considered necessary for noise other than adherence to hours of
operation. A complaints protocol is to be developed for the proposed works
Traffic to and from the site associated with the trenching will be limited and is not expected to impact the
safety or efficiency of the road network. No special traffic management arrangements are considered
necessary.
8. Operational Requirements
The site will be secured at all times with no public access possible. This is to prevent any incidents related to
pedestrians falling into open trenches.
Staff and visitors are to be inducted into the WHS Plan and the required protective measures required relating
to potential soil contamination on site. A copy of documentation confirming inductions is to be provided to
Council.
A complaints and communications strategy is to be developed with all complaints being referred to the
contractor for immediate action and a copy provided to Council by the contractor. Signage providing contact
details is to be installed on all frontages of the site.
9. Summary of Mitigation Measures

Measures to be implemented to avoid or mitigate impacts potentially occurring from the works are
summarised in Table 2.
Table 2 Summary of mitigation measures
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure

Water
standard erosion and sediment control measures
silt mesh barriers if sediments are saturated
diversion bunds if trenches are to remain open for extended
periods
Vegetation Management
implementation of the North Bank Precinct Weed Management
Plan
Contaminated soil
prepare and implement WHS Plan

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure
place excavated soil back into trenches as soon as possible after

completion of works to prevent soil drying out
if off-site removal of contaminated soil necessary, sample and test
stockpile around SB1 for leachable contaminants and remove
contaminated material to an approved disposal facility (pending
results and EPA approval)
Dust and Air Emissions
public access to be restricted during works
preparation and implementation of WHS Plan
site inductions for personnel and visitors
use of appropriate PPE by all personnel on site when required
return excavated fill to trenches as soon as practical
Acid Sulfate Soils
implementation of the North Bank Precinct Acid Sulfate Soil
Management Plan
Soil Management
standard erosion and sediment control measures
silt mesh if sediments are saturated
diversion bunds if trenches are to remain open for extended
periods
Noise Impacts
adherence to hours of operation
all machinery to be in good working order with appropriate noise
attenuation devices fitted
follow up on any complaints received in accordance with complaints
procedure

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
References
City of Launceston 2017. North Bank Precinct Footbridge Vegetation, Flora and Fauna Assessment
Appendix A Plan of trench locations

Appendix B Weed Management Plan
Appendix C Soil sampling plan and results
Appendix D Acid Sulphate Soils Management Plan

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Appendix A
Plan of trench locations
pitt&sherry ref: HB17014 31P CEMP Rev 00.docx/AUTHOR/word processor

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
N
STR EET
LIN DSAY
SW
SW
SW
SW
TING
SPS SW
EXIS
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
R
IVE
SW
KR
SW
SW
SW
ES
SW
SW
H
RT
SW
SW 0 10 20 30m
NO
SW
PRELIMINARY
B FOR APPROVAL
SW SW
SW
SW
A INITIAL ISSUE
SW
Stormwater Drainage
SW
Layout Plan
LEGEND:
TA
M AR
SW
RI

VE
T 63 2 479 5600 F 63 2 479 5601

R
PROPOSED SURFACE
OUTFALL PIPELINE
scale 1:1000 for A3 job no. 32-18399
CADASTRAL / PARCEL
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Appendix B
North Bank Weed Management Plan

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
North Bank Precinct

Weed Management Plan
April 2017
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
1. Introduction
Located in the inner city suburb of Invermay, the North Bank site area encompasses
the riverfront parcels of land at the confluence of the North Esk River and the Tamar
Estuary to the south of Lindsay Street, and the former light industrial and mixed use
parcels to the north.
The southern river edge frontage to the North Esk River and Tamar Estuary is
characterised by a high level of user amenity and high quality built form along the
Royal Park and Old Seaport areas. In direct contrast to this aesthetically pleasing
and active precinct, the northern river frontage is currently characterised by
undesirable aesthetic qualities, low amenity river edge and intertidal zone,
unmanaged natural environment, and poor quality built form. A Masterplan vision for
the regeneration of the former commercial and industrial land on the southern side of
Lindsay Street in Invermay is complete. This land includes the river edge parcels
created by the new Flood Levee.
The redevelopment of this North Bank precinct will create an exciting new precinct
on the northern edge of the city, and the project is aiming to 'break new ground' in
urban riverside development. It will be a 'must visit' destination for both tourists and
visitors to Launceston.
2. Purpose and Scope
The City of Launceston (COL) is committed to achieving environmentally sustainable
development. Major construction projects such as the North Bank Precinct are
important to Launceston's economic development. However, during construction,
such projects can pose a significant risk to the environment, which must be
addressed. To maximise environmental outcomes, the COL requires the
implementation of high quality environmental controls and effective environmental
management systems for each project.
The management of weeds is identified as a high priority by CoL. This document
outlines a weed management framework to be applied to the North Bank Precinct
during construction.
3. Background
Weeds can be defined as introduced plants, both exotic and non-endemic native
species, which have invaded natural ecosystems. Environmental weeds are often a
symptom of other degrading impacts on bushland such as high nutrient stormwater
runoff, erosion and sedimentation, dumping of green waste and clearing. Once
established, the weed populations also become a degrading factor which further
alters environmental conditions to promote increased native vegetation loss. Adverse
impacts of environmental weeds include:
Degraded landscape values and impeded access which impacts on urban
amenity and tourism;
Competition with local native plants for sunlight, moisture and nutrients;
Inhibition of the native plant germination;
Alteration of habitat for threatened/endemic species;
Encouraging more frequent and intense fires;
Changes to soil characteristics such as nutrient cycles, pH, moisture and
microbiology; and
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Increase nutrient levels in water and lower levels of oxygen that may threaten
aquatic fauna.
The site of the proposed North Bank Precinct and immediate surrounds contain
"declared weeds" within the meaning of the Tasmanian Weed Management Act
1999:
- crack willow Salix spp.
- blackberry, Rubus fruticosus aggregate
- Paterson's curse Echium plantagineum
- ragwort Senecio jacobaea
Two species, willow and blackberry, are also Weeds of National Significance
(WoNS).
The proposed project area also contains the environmental weed Scotch thistle,
Cirsium vulgare.
4. Weed Management Plan
Mitigation measures identified during the pre-construction phase include:
Prior to works commencing, declared and environmental weeds within the
construction area will be controlled by a licensed contractor;
Prior to entering the construction area all personnel will complete a weed
management inductions;
A wash down area will be established on site, and will be maintained to
prevent the further spread of declared and environmental weeds. Prior to
leaving site vehicles and/or machinery must be adequately clean to prevent
the spread of weeds;
Soil and vegetative matter from the clean down area is to be removed
regularly and stockpiled and/or disposed of to an appropriate site;
Signage will be established at clean and wash-down points, directing
machinery/ vehicle operators to use these facilities;
Weeds have the potential to germinate in the project area during construction
within areas such as around infrastructure, fencing, soil stockpiles, disturbed
areas, etc. As such, on-going weed control works will be maintained during
construction;
Any topsoil/bedding that is imported to site is required to be certified weed
free (where practicable);
Any excess soil/fill cannot be used onsite, will be disposed of at a licensed
receiving facility or other property with an approved planning permit to receive
such material;
Weed-infested stockpiles as well as topsoil which are to be transported away
must be covered to protect against further spread and contamination; and
Disturbed areas must be re-sown as soon as practicable to minimise the area
of exposed soil for weed establishment and spread.
Post-works monitoring will be undertaken by CoL staff, with appropriate control of
novel or exacerbated infestations.
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Appendix C
North Bank Soil Sampling Plan and Results

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date

God
Gord
Stree
Stree
erich
on
t
t
Kin
g
et
sW
re
ay St
Linds
ha
rf R
oa
d
SB1
Lower Cha
!
SB2
rles Stree
SB3
Lower Ch
!
Taroo
SB4
!
n
!
arles Stre
a Stre
t
e
Esplanad
et
SB5 !
et
SB6
!
River Tamar
Boulevard
North Esk
River
Seaport
lk
Wa
ra
d
xan
Ale
Data sources:
Aerial photo date unknown Legend
Soil samples Launceston City Council

Northbank - ESA
Appendix B
!
0 10 20 40 60 Cadastral parcels
Sample location

Map ref H17014R5
Metres Revision C
plan
Author ldrummond
Date 6/06/2017
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Contaminated
pH (CaCl2) pH unit ---- ---- 5.7 5.7 5.8 ---- ---- ---- ---- 5.7 ---- ---- ---- ---- 4.5 Max mg/kg Max mg/kg Max mg/kg
Clay content (%) % ---- ---- 53 25 14 ---- ---- ---- ---- 48 ---- ---- ---- ---- 47
Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) g/cm3 ---- ---- 2.61 2.61 2.64 ---- ---- ---- ---- 2.52 ---- ---- ---- ---- 2.54
Caiton Exchange Capacity meq/100 g ---- ---- 18.7 9.1 3.1 ---- ---- ---- ---- 18.4 ---- ---- ---- ---- 11.3

Arsenic mg/kg 5 7 12 <5 5 <5 <5 <5 28 <5 <5 <5 14 <5 11 15 300 100 20 200 750
Barium mg/kg 10 40 50 100 10 20 120 120 30 110 100 80 20 80 20 30 --- 300 3000 30000
Beryllium mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 2 <1 <1 <1 1 <1 <1 <1 90 2 40 400
Boron mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 20,000
Cadmium mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 90 3 40 400
Chromium mg/kg 2 24 38 17 16 8 10 15 58 19 14 16 32 29 24 35 300 408 50 500 5000
Cobalt mg/kg 2 8 9 13 8 6 35 12 13 17 12 15 26 22 4 9 300 100 200 7500
Copper mg/kg 5 34 56 49 8 5 39 43 38 50 44 42 18 31 12 21 17,000 135 100 2000 1000
Iron mg/kg 0.005 ---- ---- 5.25 2.53 1.88 ---- ---- ---- ---- 4.53 ---- ---- ---- ---- 3.05 ---
Lead mg/kg 5 46 64 12 7 24 11 8 34 10 7 8 16 15 13 18 600 1,100 300 1200 3000
Manganese mg/kg 5 226 214 119 224 438 241 136 243 204 101 145 130 227 76 150 19,000 500 5000 25000
Nickel mg/kg 2 16 19 14 10 6 13 14 28 14 14 12 30 11 9 15 1,200 176 60 600 3000
Selenium mg/kg 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 700 10 50 200
Vanadium mg/kg 5 49 74 116 30 19 128 94 78 167 114 132 41 99 43 60 ---
Zinc mg/kg 5 244 155 42 22 15 17 22 105 23 19 21 65 18 168 232 30,000 285 200 14000 50000

Mercury mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.6 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.1 0.2 80 1 30 110

Aldrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 10
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 10
Total Chlordane (sum) mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 70
Endosulfan (sum) mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 340
Endrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 20
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 10
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 10
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 400
Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 400 180 2 200 1000
Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 10 2 20 50

Chlorpyrifos mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 250
Criteria exceeded
4- CRC Care (2011) HSL-Intrusive Maintenance Workers (IMW), Table B(3), mg/kg
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Contaminated
EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Max mg/kg Max mg/kg Max mg/kg
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NL
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Fluorene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5 0.8 2.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1
Anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.6
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 1.8 6.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.6
Pyrene mg/kg 0.5 1.9 6.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.8
Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 1.1 4.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.1
Chrysene mg/kg 0.5 1 4.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9
Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 1.2 6.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 0.6 2.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.8
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 1 5.3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 0.08 2 20
Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 0.6 2.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/kg 0.5 0.8 3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6
Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons mg/kg 0.5 10.8 46.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 8.8 300 20 40 200
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (zero) mg/kg 0.5 1.4 7.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1 3
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (half LOR) mg/kg 0.5 1.6 7.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 3
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (LOR) mg/kg 0.5 1.9 7.8 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 3
EP080: BTEX
Benzene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 NL 120 350 1,100 65
Toluene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NL 18,000 NL 120,000 105
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NL 5,300 NL 85,000 125
meta- & para-Xylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NL NL 45
ortho-Xylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NL NL
Total Xylenes mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NL 15,000 NL 130,000 45
Sum of BTEX mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 NL
Naphthalene mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0 NL 1,900 NL 29,000 170

C6 - C9 Fraction mg/kg 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
C10 - C14 Fraction mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <100 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
C15 - C28 Fraction mg/kg 100 230 340 <100 <100 <100 <200 270 110 130 180 <100 <100 <100 <100 190
C29 - C36 Fraction mg/kg 100 210 250 <100 <100 <100 <200 250 170 230 360 <100 <100 <100 130 180
C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) mg/kg 50 440 590 <50 <50 <50 <100 520 280 360 540 <50 <50 <50 130 370
C10 - C14 Fraction mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
C15 - C28 Fraction mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
C29 - C36 Fraction mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM

2013
C6 Fractions
- C10 Fraction mg/kg 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 NL 5,100 NL 82,000
C6 - C10 Fraction minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 NL 62,000 180
>C10 - C16 Fraction mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 NL 3,800 NL 85,000
>C16 - C34 Fraction mg/kg 100 400 540 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 NL 5,300 120,000 1300
>C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) mg/kg 50 400 540 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 NL
>C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene (F2) mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 NL 120
>C16 - C34 Fraction mg/kg 100 150 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 NL 3,800 120,000 120
>C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) mg/kg 50 150 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 NL 7,400 2800
>C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene (F2) mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 NL
Criteria exceeded
4- CRC Care (2011) HSL-Intrusive Maintenance Workers (IMW), Shallow Trench 0-2m, Table B(3), mg/kg
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
Date
Contact
Leigh Knight
(03) 6323 1973
lknight@pittsh.com.au
transport | community | mining | industrial | food & beverage | energy
Brisbane Launceston Newcastle E: info@pittsh.com.au

Level 2 Level 4 Level 1
W: www.pittsh.com.au
276 Edward Street 113 Cimitiere Street 81 Hunter Street
Brisbane QLD 4000 PO Box 1409 Newcastle NSW 2300 incorporated as
T: (07) 3221 0080 Launceston TAS 7250 T: (02) 4910 3600
Pitt & Sherry (Operations) Pty Ltd
F: (07) 3221 0083 T: (03) 6323 1900 ABN 67 140 184 309
F: (03) 6334 4651
Devonport Sydney
Level 1 Suite 902, Level 9,
35 Oldaker Street Melbourne 1-5 Railway Street
PO Box 836 Level 1, HWT Tower Chatswood NSW 2067
Devonport TAS 7310 40 City Road PO Box 5487
T: (03) 6424 1641 Southbank VIC 3006 West Chatswood NSW 1515
F: (03) 6424 9215 PO Box 259 T: (02) 9468 9300
South Melbourne VIC 3205
Hobart T: (03) 9682 5290
199 Macquarie Street F: (03) 9682 5292
GPO Box 94
Hobart TAS 7001
T: (03) 6210 1400
F: (03) 6223 1299

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0282/2017
g
Date
150
g
W
L
B

150
e t
y S tre
BLW
W
a
BLW
Linds
L
B LW
B
g
B L
225
W
B L
g
S. N/A
I. N/A
B L
W
B L
Taro
o na SW
B L
W
tr eet
B L
W
S. N/A
g225 B L
W
I. N/A
B L
W
g
B L
W
2 5 B
2
L
W
S. N/A
I. N/A
B L
W
B L
W
600 B L
W
B L
W
B L
W
S. N/A
g225
B L
I. N/A
W
B L
W
B L
W
2 5 g
2
B L
B
L
W
S. N/A
I. N/A
B L
W
S. 2.2
I. .85
B
@
!
B
LW
S.

g I.
B
@
!
S. 5.95
I. 0.33
O
Scale at A4 :
!
S.
1:1,000
I.
<
!!
Metres
0 20
Printed: 26/04/2017
NOTE:
While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the
information portrayed on this plan its purpose is to provide a general
indication of the location of Council services. The information provided
may contain errors or omissions and the accuracy may not suit all users.
A site inspection and investigation is recommended before commencement of
any project based on this data. This note forms an integral part of this plan.
City of Launceston 2017
Document Set ID: 3555021 A4P

Advertised Documents - DA0282.2017 PDF

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Advertised Documents - DA0282.2017 PDF

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

PLANNING EXHIBITED

WATER PIPEWORK Makati City 1232 Philippines

T 63 2 479 5600 F 63 2 479 5601

Version: 1, Version Date: 20/06/2017

North Bank Precinct Site Works

3. Background to the Proposed Development 11

4. Development Application Assessment 13

4.17 Local Historic Heritage Code E13.0 28

B Electrical Reticulation Layout Plan

C Levee Modification Plans

F Conceptual Landscape Plan

G Environmental Site Assessment

H Construction and Environmental Management Plan

I Stormwater Infrastructure Plan

1.1 Purpose of the Report

0408 397 393

1.2 Statutory References

1.2.1 Name of Planning Instrument

1.2.2 Name of Planning Authority

1.3 Description of Proposed Development

Stormwater drainage layout

Electrical cabling layout

1.3.1 Limitation of proposed development

2.1 The Subject Land

Figure 2- Zoning Plan

2.2 Title Information

Address Owner(s) Title Reference

61 Lindsay Street, Invermay City of Launceston 198362/1

65 Lindsay Street, Invermay City of Launceston 133205/1

79 Lindsay Street, Invermay City of Launceston 169882/1

81-83 Lindsay Street, Invermay City of Launceston 101627/1

3 Taroona Street, Invermay City of Launceston 133205/2

Not listed City of Launceston 84271/1

Not listed City of Launceston 252170/1

Not Listed City of Launceston 127765/2

Taroona Street road reserve City of Launceston No Title Reference

Copies of relevant certificate of titles are contained at Appendix D.

2.3 Description of Area

2.5 Access and Road Network

2.6 Site Contamination

3. Background to the Proposed Development

4. Development Application Assessment

4.2 Use Categorisation

4.3 Approval Status

Open Space Zone:

Potentially Contaminated Land Code:

Water Quality Code:

4.4 Open Space Zone Provisions

4.4.1 Zone Purpose

19.4.1 Building height, setback and siting

Acceptable Solution Performance Criteria

protect the amenity of adjoining lots and

Acceptable Solution Performance Criteria

as shown in a detailed landscaping plan

4.5 Bushfire Prone Area Code E1.0

4.6 Potentially Contaminated Land Code E2.0

E2.5.1 Use Standards

Acceptable Solution Performance Criteria

(c) a plan to manage contamination and

(i) an environmental site assessment;

(ii) any specific remediation and protection

The risk to construction workers during installation of underground services is

E2.6.1 Subdivision not applicable