Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
IN ASSOCIATION WITH
DURGA LAL SHRESTHA, MACROECONOMIC MODELING SPECIALIST
VIKAS RAJ SATYAL, ECONOMETRICIAN
ROJAN BAJRACHARYA, NATIONAL IT SPECIALIST
1
The modeling team would like to express their gratitude to Mr. Shahid Parwez,
Program/ Project Implementation Officer, and Mr. Yubraj Acharya, Economics
Officer, ADB Nepal Resident Mission for providing all possible support for the
project; Mr. Ravindra Prasad Pande, Executive Director (Research), Nepal Rastra
Bank (NRB) and Chairman, Technical Committee on Modeling for strategic
guidance; Dr. Nephil Matangi Maskay, Director (Research), NRB and Focal Officer
for day-to-day supervision; Dr. Ram Sharan Kharel, Deputy Director (Research)
and Secretary, Technical Committee for valuable discussions and comments on
modeling; Mr. Suman Neupane, Assistant Director (Research) for logistics
support and all the concerned divisions in the Research Department, NRB for
their enthusiastic cooperation, keen interest, useful discussions and for providing
relevant data and documents.
1
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
CONTENTS
Contents Pages
2. Current status of works and proposed Work Plan for the second 6-19
phase (6 April-31 May 2010) presented at the Tripartite meeting
held on the 20th April 2010
2
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
During the second phase (6th April to 31st May 2010), it is propose to complete the works on
development and test and calibration of the upgraded Nepal Macroeconomic Mode. During
the month under review, significant progress has been made towards that goal.
Derailed discussions have been held with all the concerned divisions in the Research
Department of NRB and the model structures of five sub-models have been finalized. Time
series data on about 160 variables for 36 years 1975-2009 have been compiled and coded
in the EViews7. Unit Root Tests have been conducted for all variables and Ganger Causality
Tests have been conducted for meaningful pairs of observations.
Equations have been specified, tested and calibrated for two sub-models viz. the Real
Sectors and National Accounts, and the Government Finance Blocks. Tests and calibrations
for other sub-models are continuing.
The following reports have been prepared during the month. Copies of all these Reports
are attached herewith for ready reference. These reports have been prepared with full
support and close collaboration with the National Consultants and the concerned Divisions
of NRB.
2. Current status of works and work plan for the second phase- power point
presentation at the Technical Committee Meeting held on the 26th April 2010.
Tarun Das, International Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist and team Leader attended
the following major meetings during April 2010:
(1) Day-to-day briefings by Dr. Maskay, Focal Officer for about half an hour every day;
3
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
(2) Tuesday, the 6th April 2010 –0830-0900 Briefing meetings with Mr. Shahid Parwez,
Project Coordinator, and Ms. Shreejana, Finance Officer, ADB Nepal Resident
Office, Kamladi, Kathmandu.
(3) Tuesday, the 6th April 2010 –1000-1030 Briefing meetings with Dr. Kharel, Deputy
Director (Research) and Secretary, Technical Committee, NRB and Mr. Suman
Neupane, Assistant Director (Research), NRB.
(4) Wednesday, the 7th April 2010 –1130-1230 Briefing meetings with Mr. Ravindra
Pande, ED (Research), NRB and Chairman, Technical Committee.
(5) Thursday, the 8th April 2010 – Forenoon, Discussions and feedback sessions with
National Accounts and Prices Divisions of the Research department, NRB.
(6) Thursday, the 8th April 2010 – Afternoon, Discussions and feedback sessions with
BOP Division of the Research department, NRB.
(7) Sunday, the 11th April 2010- Forenoon, Discussions and feedback sessions with
Monetary and Financial Division of the Research department, NRB.
(8) Sunday, the 11th April 2010- Afternoon, Discussions and feedback sessions with
Government Finance Division of the Research department, NRB.
(9) Tuesday, the 20th April 2010 – 1600-1800 hours: Tripartite Meeting among NRB,
ADB and Consultants on the status of works and Work Plan for the second phase.
(10) Monday, the 26th April 2010 – 0930-1100 hours: Technical Committee Meeting
chaired by Mr. Ravindra Prasad Pande, ED (Research) and Chairman, Technical
Committee regarding current status of works and the Work Plan during the second
phase.
(11) Thursday, the 29th April 2010- 1500-1600 Discussions with Dr. Maskay and Dr.
Kharel along with all consultants and Mr. Neupane regarding the Visual Display
software
As per the proposed Work Plan, the following works are at different stages of completion
and the associated Outputs/ Reports will be produced in May 2010:
(b) Test and Calibration of all sub-models of the Nepal Macroeconomic Model;
(c) Integration of all Models, Simulations and Projections under baseline and alternative
scenario;
(d) Preparation of the Visual Display Software with the help of local vendors;
(e) Organization of five internal seminars for presentation of five sub-models by the
consultants;
(f) Organization of five internal seminars for presentation of revised sub-models by the
concerned divisions of the Research Division of the NRB;
4
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
(g) Organization of the Final Workshop foe multi-stakeholders on the 28th/ 29th May
2010;
(h) Preparation of the final Report on the test and calibration techniques, projections and
simulations of the integrated Nepal Macroeconomic Model.
(Tarun Das)
Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist and Team Leader
The 30th April 2010
Copy to: Dr. Nephil Matangi Maskay, Director (Research), NRB and Focal Officer
5
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
At the instance of Dr. Nephil Matangi Maskay, Director (Research), NRB and Focal Officer
for the Component B of the ADB TA Project, the International Consultant returned to
Kathmandu on Monday, the 5th April 2010 after more than five and half months of the
completion of the first phase in the middle of October 2009. He resumed works on Modeling
in the NRB Project Room with effect from Tuesday, the 6th April 2010, under the strategic
guidance of Mr. Mr. Ravindra Prasad Pandey, ED (Research Department), NRB and the
Chairman of the Technical Committee, and the day-to-day supervision and direction by Dr.
Nephil Matangi Maskay.
Mr. Suman Neupane, Assistant Director (Research) is working with the International
Consultant on continual basis and providing all logistics support. Dr. Ram Sharan Kharel,
Deputy Director (Research) and secretary (Technical Committee) is providing necessary
help and advice on the model. The local consultants Prof. Durga Lal Shrestha and Prof.
Vikash Raj Satyal have also started working in the NRB Project Room on two or three
working days in a week.
In the meantime, on the basis of ADB approval, orders have been placed by the NRB for the
procurement of hardware. Mr. Rojan Bajracharya, local consultant on IT, has initiated steps
to place orders for the procurement of the EVIEWs7 software from the designated vendor.
The installation of the hardware may take one more week, and the procurement and
installation of the software may not be complete until the end of April 2010. The non-
availability of the requisite hardware and software is a major constraint for the full
involvement of the local consultants and stakeholders in the process of test and calibration
of the model. However, the International Consultant has procured and installed EViews7 on
his lap top at his own expenditure and has already started test and calibration of the model
on his own laptop. EViews4 is available on the PC of Mr. Neupane for performing initial tests
of the model.
During discussions, it was agreed that the ultimate model structure has to satisfy not only
the economic theories but also the standard statistical tests for specification and calibration
such as unit root test for stationary, granger causality tests and the co-integration tests in
addition to the usual goodness of fit statistics. Divisions also expressed their willingness to
be directly involved in the modeling process, particularly for their sub-model, from the very
beginning.
6
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
1.3 Limitations of the NMEM and Steps Taken in the Upgraded Model
Annex-1 in this report summarizes the limitations of the ADB NMEM and the steps taken in
the Proposed Upgradation by us to rectify these limitations. Annex-2 presents the
differences of basic features between ADB NMEM and Upgraded NMEM in a tabular form.
In brief, the earlier NMEM was a demand-based model in the Keynesian framework and
ignored the role of supply for the real sectors and money and credits. Upgraded model has
specific blocks for the supply sides of GDP and money.
In addition, the upgraded model has fully developed the government finance and balance of
payments blocks which were very weak in the NMEM. For all the sub-models, the upgraded
model is more detailed than the ADB NMEM and uses more up-to-date data on national
accounts, BOP and government finance on the basis of revised base or revised IMF
concepts, which were not available at the time of building NMEM more than five years ago.
For example, the NMEM consisted of only 59 variables, out of which 37 were endogenous
(comprising 20 behavioral equations and 17 identities) and 22 were exogenous. On contrast,
the upgraded model comprises 151 variables, of which 139 variables are treated as
endogenous and determined within the sub-models, and only 12 variables are treated as
exogenous and determined outside the model. Out of 139 endogenous variables, 92
variables will be determined by equations and the residual 47 variables are identities to
ensure consistency and equilibrium within the sub-models.
We also propose use more modern techniques on the test and calibration. For example, the
NMEM did not use unit root test for stationarity, granger causality test for determining
directions of causality and the Cointegration test to examine whether the dependent and
independent variables are integrated at the same level. All these tests will be used for test
and calibration of the upgraded model.
On the 13th April 2010, the International Consultant submitted a proposed work plan which is
reproduced in Annex-4. Dr. Maskay provided brief comments on the Work plan on the
Friday, the 16th April 2010, which are reproduced in Annex-5. This report presents a revised
Work plan in response to these comments.
2 Updated Work plan during the Second Phase (6 April-31 May 2010).
The week-wise updated work plan is presented in a matrix form in Table-1 below where first
column indicates the weekly time schedules, the second column indicates different activities
and the third column specifies the role of local consultants and the stakeholders in these
activities. The table is self-explanatory. We summarize below the proposed steps and the
role of local consultants and the stakeholders in the NRB in building up the model and in the
test and calibration of the model,
7
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
As mentioned earlier, during the first week in the current phase, the local consultants
provided detailed data matrix for 151 variables for the period 1975-2009 to the international
consultant. These data have been supplemented by additional data supplied by the
concerned divisions. All these data have been processed and the relevant EViews7 Workfile
has been prepared on the lap top of the international consultant. With the help of local
consultants, data sets have been validated and some preliminary tests have been carried
out on EViews7.
As per the terms of reference, the modeling work is a joint team work by the international
and national consultants. Although the international consultant has the major responsibility in
upgrading the model, the local consultants, who are also experts in their respective fields,
are supposed to provide necessary advice to the international consultant. In addition to
providing data, the local consultants are expected to provide economic, statistical and
econometric advice and help to the international consultant for building up the sub-models,
for test and calibration of the sub-models, for preparing the working papers, manuals and
guideline and for providing training and helping in capacity building and dissemination of
knowledge for the stakeholders. All these activities require physical presence of the local
consultants in the NRB Project room. It is, therefore, advisable that like the international
consultant, the local consultants also attend the NRB Project Office on full time basis on all
working days during the remaining six weeks of the second phase until the end of May 2010
and fully participate in the test and calibration of the model and in writing the report.
The EAD will have the sole responsibility to update the upgraded model and to review it from
time to time and the conduct the relevant simulations and projections for monetary policy
planning and for providing inputs to for the preparation of the Annual Budgets and national
Development plans. For this purpose, Mr. Suman Neupane has been fully involved in the
day-to-day works and test and calibrations by the consultants. Mr. Neupane and Dr. Kharel
may also present a paper on the integrated model structure under the overall supervision by
Dr. Maskay and with the help by the consultants.
As mentioned earlier, the concerned divisions have expressed their willingness to be directly
involved along with the consultants for the test and calibration of the respective sub-model
and for preparation and presentation of the sectoral paper in the workshop.
A separate report will be prepared on the possible academic visits or study tours on
modeling to other countries. As desired, in addition to the proposed Indian institutes,
possibility of attachment to other academic institutes in Malaysia and Korea will be explored.
8
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
Table-1: Work Plan Matrix during Second phase (6 April 2010 to 31 May 2010)
Weeks in the Second Activities Specific Role of local
Phase consultants and other
(6 April-31 May 2010) divisions*
First week- Tuesday, 6th 1.1 Strategic guidance by Local consultants provided
April to Sunday, 11th April ED and Focal officer; detailed data base, collected
2010 1.2 Discussions on during the intermittent period,
consolidated comments and attended meetings with
by the concerned the respective divisions on
divisions, two days.
1.3 Detailed discussions
on data base, structure,
test and calibration of the
sub-models with various
divisions viz. national
accounts, BOP, Govt.
Finance, Monetary and
Prices Units;
1.4 Collection of relevant
data on sub-models
Second week- Monday, 12th 2.1 Submission of the Prof. Satyal attended NRB
April to Sunday, 18th April proposed work-plan; Project Room on three days
2010 2.2 Preparing Workfile on and Prof. Shrestha attended
EViews7 with collected on two days during the week.
data
2.3 Validation of the
Workfile and matching
the data with those
obtained from various
divisions;
2.4 Carrying out selected
test runs on Eviews7
along with local
consultants regarding
Unit Root, Granger
Causality and
Cointegration Tests and
fitting of sample
Regression lines;
2.5 Discussions on the
comments on the work-
plan received from Dr.
Maskay, Dr. Kharel and
Mr. Neupane;
2.6 Submission of revised
work-plan in response to
these comments.
Note: * International consultant Tarun Das and Mr. Suman Neupane will be involved on full
time basis for all activities and on all working days during the second phase.
9
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
10
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
11
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
Annex-1
The following table summarizes the limitations of the earlier Nepal Macroeconomic Model
and the steps to be taken to rectify the limitations and upgrade the model in the proposed
model:
Limitations of the earlier Nepal Steps taken to rectify the limitations in the
Macroeconomic Model proposed upgraded model
a) Model considers only the demand side Supply side of GDP will be projected by the sub-
of GDP, but does not consider the sector wise econometric time trends as well as by
supply side of the real sectors. fitting Cobb-Douglas type production functions in the
framework of Solow technical progress
b) Money, credit and price blocks were Supply of different components of money will be
not fully developed and did not projected. Prices and exchange rates will be fully
consider the supply side and the role developed. Role of expectations will be considered
of expectations. in the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium
model.
c) The Government block was the Government finance block is being fully developed
weakest block with only equation for with separate equations for different components of
the non-tax revenue and all other expenditure and revenues.
variables were defined by simple
accounting identities.
d) Basically, all the fiscal variables such In the upgraded model, government expenditures
as taxes, current and capital and revenues are not treated as exogenous
expenditure are treated as policy variables, rather would be determined by the overall
variables and left to be decided by the prospects of the economy and given upper limits on
policy makers. This is not a very the fiscal deficits and other fiscal sustainability
convincing assumption because taxes measures.
and government expenditures also
depend on economic prospects,
composition of GDP and many other
variables.
e) Similarly, balance of payments block BOP block is being fully developed by endogenizing
were not well developed. It considered different components in the current and capital
only merchandise exports and accounts such as net services, net income,
merchandised imports but did not remittances, FDI inflows etc. External debt
endogenize the other components in sustainability measures will also be estimated.
the current account (such as services
and remittances). In the capital
account, loans and amortization was
endogenized, but the underlying
econometric relations are less
convincing.
f) There had been structural changes in The model is also being updated on the basis of
the economy and also changes in the data for the period 1975-2009 incorporating new
basic concepts of data for different data available for the national accounts, government
blocks. The model also needs to be finance and balance of payments, and to take care
updated and upgraded on the basis of of structural change of the economy over the years..
new data available for the national
accounts and balance of payments.
12
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
Annex-2
The following table summarizes the basic characteristics of the earlier Nepal Macroeconomic
Model and the present upgraded Nepal Macroeconomic Model
Basic characteristics of the earlier Basic characteristics of the present
Nepal Macroeconomic Model upgraded Nepal Macroeconomic Model
a) The NMEM is a basically The upgraded NMEM considers demand and
Keynesian income-expenditure supply side of real, money and external
model in which the demand side sectors and attempts to provide partial
determines GDP. equilibrium in the macroeconomic
consistency accounting framework.
b) The supply side is not explicitly Supply sides of sectoral GDP, money supply
specified as the aggregate and external sectors are specifically
production function is not considered in the upgraded model.
estimated.
c) There are 5 building blocks in the There are also five blocks in the upgraded
NMEM viz. final demand, prices, model viz. (a) supply and demand for real
credit and money, government, sectors and National accounts; (b) supply
and the balance of payments and demand for money and credits; (c)
blocks. Final demand is the sum government finance with detailed projections
of private consumption, for major components of expenditure and
government consumption, private revenues; (d) balance of payments with
fixed investment, government detailed projections of major components in
fixed investment, increase in the current account and the capital and
stock or inventory, and net financial accounts; (e) prices, interest rates
exports. In NMEM, development ad exchange rates.
expenditure is a determinant for
the private fixed investment,
public fixed investment and public
consumption.
d) The NMEM is a mid-sized model The upgraded NMEM is a large sized model
with 37 equations. A medium- with 151 variables. It will provide more
sized model has an advantage in flexibility for the policy makers to analyze the
policy analysis as it incorporates impact of many variables o the fiscal,
more detail of the structure of the monetary, balance of payments and overall
economy. economic outlook.
e) The NMEM consists of 59 The upgraded model comprises 151
variables, out of which 37 are variables, of which 139 variables are treated
endogenous (20 behavioral as endogenous and determined within the
equations and 17 identities) and sub-models, and only 12 variables are
22 are exogenous. The NMEM treated as exogenous and determined
distinguishes policy variables outside the model. Out of 139 endogenous
from simple exogenous variables, variables, 92 variables will be determined by
as these policy variables are equations and the residual 47 variables are
determined by non-economic identities to ensure consistency and
forces or foreign sectors. Taxes, equilibrium within the sub-models.
regular expenditures,
development expenditures,
foreign borrowing, and the
exchange rate were taken as
policy variables in the NMEM.
13
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
f) The NMM attempts to incorporate While the upgraded model also considers
Nepal’s strong economic ties with the predominance of external sector flows
India in international transactions with India, it makes an attempt to
although economic relationships endogenize many external sector flows such
with other countries are also as remittances, income, service, FDI etc.
becoming important.
g) The impact of the exchange rate The role of NEER and REER and the dollar
on trade in Nepal is quite limited exchange rate will be taken as determining
since the Nepalese rupee is factors for external trade and commerce
pegged to the Indian rupee and
India is the major trading partner
of Nepal. The exchange rate
variables were incorporated in the
trade equations since the changes
in the exchange rate with respect
to the US dollar can affect trade
with the rest of world by changing
the relative prices with other
countries.
14
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
Annex-3
1. Background
The modeling team comprising International Consultant Tarun Das and National Consultants
Prof. Durga Lal Shrestha and Prof. Vikash Raj Satyal submitted a detailed Inception Report
on Nepal Macroeconomic Modeling (in two parts) in the middle of October 2009. At the
instance of Dr. Nephil Matangi Maskay, Director, Research Division, Nepal Rastra Bank
(NRB) and Focal Officer, ADB Project No.TA7165NEP (Component B), the International
Consultant returned to Kathmandu on Monday, the 5th April 2010 and resumed works
modeling in the NRB Project Room with effect from Tuesday, the 6th April 2010.
Subsequently the local consultants also joined him for executing project assignments as per
the terms of reference.
Subsequently, the consultants held detailed discussions with the respective units on the
model structures, data base, and test and calibration techniques. It is well known that the
proposed model has an integrated model with five sub-models viz. real sector, prices and
interest rates, BOP, government finance, monetary and fiscal sectors.
Comments given by the units are very constructive and vary valuable for modifying the
model structures. However, in some cases, the required data are not available. During
detailed discussions with the Divisions, it was agreed that the ultimate model structure has to
satisfy not only the economic theories but also the standard statistical tests for specification
and calibration such as unit root test for non-stationary or stochasticity or randomness of the
variables, granger causality tests and the co-integration tests in addition to the usual
goodness of fit statistics. So at this stage it is not advisable to argue theoretically regarding
the exact form of equations. It will be more useful to start the test and calibration procedures
on EVIEWs with actual set of data.
It was also agreed by all the units that they would like to be involved directly in the modeling
process and activities, particularly for their sub-model, from the very beginning. For this, they
would like to nominate one or two officers from their units to work with the modeling team for
about a week for developing the sub-model. They would not only provide advice and
feedback for the specification, test and calibration of the respective sub-model but also
prepare a detailed working paper on the sub-model under the guidance of the modeling
team for presentation in the NMEM Workshop to be organized at the end of May 2010. Such
arrangement will not only help in capacity building and transfer of knowledge, which is the
basic purpose of the ADB funded project on modeling, but also enable the respective
15
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
Divisions and the NRB as a whole to own the model and update and upgrade it in future
without the help of consultants.
3.1 Work Plan for upgrading NMEM during second phase (6 April to 31 May
2010)
On the basis of above discussion and further consultation with the national consultants, the
international consultant would like to propose the following Work Plan for consideration by
the Focal officer:
During the current phase the consultants will be fully pre-occupied for upgrading the
NMEM and organizing the Workshop. Depending on the availability of time, they might
provide some directions towards modifying the DSGE Model. But the exact model will
be built, tested, calibrated, simulated and projected during the two months period of the
third phase.
3.3 Final phase- for winding up the Project- one person month
The residual time of one person month will be fully devoted to prepare the terminal report for
the project along with preparation of detailed guidelines and manuals for both the models.
Consultants agree with the views of the NRB that the hands-on training to be conducted by
the consultants and the Workshops to be organized, as mentioned above, are necessary but
not sufficient to communicate models to the stakeholders and effective transfer of
knowledge.
16
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
For wider exposure of the modelers, it is proposed that an appropriate training program for a
group of selected six officers engaged in modeling, comprising one officer from each sub-
model and one from the research division may be devised in consultation with Dr. Maskay,
Focal officer. In this respect, an academic visit by the Group for about a week to the Reserve
Bank of India (RBI) or to the Indira Gandhi Development Research Institute (IGDRI) in
Mumbai or to the Institute of Economic Growth (IEG) and the Delhi School of Economics
(DSE), who are engaged in the development of the UN-Link Model for India or to the
National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER) in New Delhi, which has
developed a Computerized General Equilibrium (CGE) Model for the Indian Finance
Ministry, may be explored. ADB will be requested to fund this academic visit, which is
considered to be an integral part of the Capacity Building Activity under the project.
Required approval has come from the ADB and the Consultants are willing and ready to
provide all possible help and advice for this activity. Urgent administrative arrangements are
necessary within the NRB. In the meantime, international consultant is working with his own
laptop on which he has installed EViews7 at his own expenditure. Until the required
hardware and software are installed in the project room, suitable arrangements may please
be made for the local consultants so that they can perform their duties more productively
and more efficiently.
6. Action Points
Dr. Maskay, Focal Officer, may please like to request formally each of the Division Heads to
nominate two officers from their division who could be directly involved on the modeling
works for about a week for the respective sub-model. The division head may also please
indicate the tentative week when they will be available for one day hands-on training on
applications of EViews7 and subsequently for a week for actual test and calibration of the
model.
(a) It is proposed that a Workshop on Upgrading NMEM will be organized on 22-23 May
2010 after completion of the test and calibration of sub-models and the core model
during the previous six weeks. A detailed schedule for the Workshop will be prepared
and submitted to ADB. Tentatitavely, the Workshop will have six working sessions
(five sessions on five sub models and one session for the core integrated model) in
addition to an inaugural session and a concluding session. For five sub-models, five
working papers are proposed to be prepared and presented by the respective units
under the guidance of the consultants, while the consultants will consolidate the sub-
models and carry out the necessary simulation and forecasting for the integrated
model and prepare and present the integrated model in the Workshop. Consultants
are of the views that such arrangement will help in active participation of the
stakeholders in modeling and effective capacity building cum hands-on training. In
principle approval of the ADB is requested for the following:
17
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
(v) Total estimated honorarium for the above activities are indicated below:
1. Return economy class air fare from 500 per person 3000
Kathmandu to Delhi/ Mumbai for six
officers
2. Per diem for 6 days for six officers 150 per person per 5400
day
Total 8400
(Tarun Das)
The 13th April 2010
18
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
Annex-4
Comments on Proposed Work-Plan
It's our great pleasure to receive your proposed work-plan which covers the period 6 April to
31 May, 2010. It is the period to upgrade and update NMEM model. The work-plan
comprises the status of the project; work guideline to complete the project; human capacity
building plan through training and participative approach; and learning through academic
visits and workshops.
We reviewed and discussed the proposed work-plan in our economic analysis division
(EAD). Comments that were raised during the discussion and review process have been
presented point wise, which are as follows.
a) While the proposed work-plan is in the concise form, it would also be better if the
detailed work-plan, including day-to-day division of works for the modeling team, is
provided available to us. This would both facilitate for preparing a progress report as
well provide a road-map to complete the work within a given time frame. We would
request that this be submitted in a matrix format.
b) The work plan does a thorough job in describing the involvement of respective
divisions' in calibrating and report writing to each blocks of macroeconomic model.
However, it is not clearly specified the role, involvement and necessary contribution
of EAD. This may be such as having EAD the sole responsibility to update and
upgrade the macroeconomic model.
c) In work plan, there is a need to have a clear picture of the difference between old
NMEM and upgraded NMEM. In this regard, it is requested that this analysis be
provided, at the greatest detail possible such as equation by equation.
d) Regarding the academic visits, given the budget, you are requested to expand you
proposal and manage the visits to institution's beyond India, such as to Korea;
Indonesia; Thailand etc., which have developed similar macroeconomic models.
It goes without saying that your discretion is required in sharing this information (such as in
regard to academic visit).
You are requested to revise your work plan accordingly for necessary discussion during the
forthcoming tripartite meeting, on April 20, 2010 at 13.00 in NRB.
19
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
Contents of presentation
1. Basic Tasks of the Project
2. Works completed in the First Phase
3. Proposed Works in Second Phase
4. Current Status of Works
5. Work Plan for the Second Phase
6. Role of National Consultants
7. Role of concerned divisions of NRB
8. Organizing Workshop
9. Proposed Study Tours
10. Concluding Observations
Second phase started on the 6th April 2010 and is expected to continue until the end of
May 2010. Major tasks include the following:
a) Installation of hardware and software
b) To build up, test, calibrate, simulate the upgraded NMEM and make projections for
the medium term
c) To prepare Manuals, guidelines and report on the upgraded NMEM
d) Capacity building cum hands-on training on NMEM for the stakeholders
e) To organize Workshop on NMEM
20
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
f) Works on DSGEM and Terminal Report will be completed in next two phases
spanning over three person months.
21
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
• National Consults will be fully involved with the test and calibration of the sub-
models, simulation and projections of the core model, preparation and presentation
of the working papers, manuals and guidelines, capacity building and hands-on
training on the models.
• National IT Expert, along with local vendors, will develop user-friendly
Macroeconomic Page on the Model data base, fitted equations and results, and
updating mechanism.
• The EAD will have the sole responsibility to update the upgraded model and to
review it from time to time.
• For this purpose, Mr. Suman Neupane, Assistant Director, has been fully involved in
the day-to-day works and test and calibrations of the sub-models.
• Mr. Neupane and Dr. Kharel may also present a paper on the integrated model
structure under the overall supervision by Dr. Maskay and with the help of the
consultants.
• In our initial work-plan, it was proposed that at least one representative of a division
will be directly involved for the test and calibration of the respective sub-model and
for preparation and presentation of the sectoral paper in the workshop.
• All the divisions expressed their willingness for this proposal.
22
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
• But, due to preoccupation with the preparation of inputs for the budget and the
Economic Survey, divisions did not get time to be involved with the modeling works.
8. Organizing Workshop
23
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
TARUN DAS
MACROECONOMIC MODELING SPECIALIST AND TEAM LEADER
IN ASSOCIATION WITH
DURGA LAL SHRESTHA, NATIONAL MODELING SPECIALIST
VIKAS RAJ SATYAL, NATIONAL ECONOMETRICIAN
ROJAN BAJRACHARYA, NATIONAL IT SPECIALIST
30 APRIL 2010
24
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
CONTENTS
25
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
The basic purpose of this exercise is to build an operational macroeconomic model for Nepal
in the consistent macroeconomic accounting framework, depicting the underlying structure,
trends and interrelations among major macroeconomic variables. As compared with the
upgraded Nepal Macroeconomic Model, which is being calibrated on EViews7 on the basis
of more advanced econometric techniques, this is a spreadsheet model calibrated on Excel
file on the basis of simple econometric relations. However, this model satisfies the basic
statistical and econometric tests for modeling, and has the following advantages:
(1) The model is based on simple economic concepts viz. trend growth rates and elasticity of
a variable with respect to GDP at current market prices;
(2) It is a spreadsheet model and can be calibrated very easily on Excel Files;
(3) As mentioned above, the model satisfies the basic econometric tests on calibration.
First of all, time series data on 150 macroeconomic variables have been collected and
processed on Excel file. The data along with standard descriptive statistics are given in the
Appendix-1 of this Report. Then, we have carried out the KPSS Unit Root tests on EViews7
for all the variables used in our model and observed that most of the variables are trend
stationary within 5 percent level of significance. The results are indicated in Appendix-3 of
this Report. Therefore, the standard least squares method can be used to fit the regression
lines. Then we test the Granger causality test and observe that the GDP at current market
prices granger causes most of the macroeconomic variables in the government finance,
balance of payments, and monetary and financial blocks. Therefore, we can use GDP
elasticity for forecasting a variable provided we get a good fit relating a variable to GDP at
market prices.
26
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
The basic structures of these sub-models and their interrelations are depicted in the form of a
flow diagram in Box-1.1. The linkages between key aggregates of the national accounts and
the balance of payments flows and government finance statistics can be summarized
algebraically within a savings/investment framework. Let us use the following symbols,
On the supply side, overall GDP equals the sectoral value added for different sectors such as
agriculture, industry and services. In our model, industry has four sub-sectors viz. mining and
quarrying, manufacturing, construction and public utilities (comprising electricity, gas and
water supply). Service has four sub-sectors viz. (a) wholesale and retail trade, hotels and
restaurants; (b) transport and communications; (c) financial services and real estate; and (d)
social sectors comprising health, education, public administration, religious, personal and
community services. GDP for the sub-sectors are projected at both constant factor cost and
current market prices.
On the demand side, GDP at factor cost equals government consumption, private
consumption, investment and inventories, and exports less imports. These items are projected
at current basic prices. By adding indirect taxes less subsidies, we get the GDP at current
market prices.
GNI equals GDP plus Net Factor Income from abroad, while Gross National Disposable
Income equals GNI plus Net Transfer.
27
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
R = Revenue = T + NT
T = Tax revenue
NT = Non-Tax revenue
GR = Grants
GEXP = Government expenditure and net lending = G + GK
G = government consumption expenditure
GK = Government capital expenditure and net lending = GCE + ND
GCE = Government capital expenditure
ND = Net lending
GFD = Gross Fiscal Deficit
= (R+GR) - GEXP
28
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
Interrelationship between the internal and external sectors of an economy can be seen in
greater detail by distinguishing between private and public sectors. Private saving and
investment (Sp and Ip) and government saving and investment (Sg and Ig) are identified as:
Use of the definition of the external current account from equation (1) then gives:
CAB = (Sp–Ip) + (Sg–Ig) = S–I (9)
Equation (9) shows that the private savings-investment balance plus the government fiscal
balance equals the current account balance. It also implies that, if government sector
dissaving is not offset by net saving of the private sector, the current account will be in
deficit. More specifically, the equation shows that the budgetary position of the government
(Sg-Ig) may be an important factor influencing the current account balance.
Government deficit is financed by borrowing from the domestic sector, borrowing from the
external sector and borrowing from the central bank. All these factors have influences on the
domestic capital and financial markets and also on the balance of payments.
Economists generally agree that a persistent fiscal deficit may ultimately spill over the
current account deficit in the balance of payments. On the converse, a sustained current
account deficit may reflect persistent government spending in excess of receipts, and such
excess spending may suggest that fiscal tightening is the appropriate policy action to tackle
both fiscal and balance of payments problems.
Where TB, SB, FIB and NCT stand for trade balance, services balance, factor incomes
balance and transfer balance respectively.
29
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
MONETARY SECTOR
Balance of Payments Monetary Authorities
CURRENT ACCOUNT • Net Foreign Assets
• Exports of goods and Net domestic assets:
Non-factor services • Net credit to central
• Imports of goods and govt.
Non-factor services • Credit to banks
• Factor services (net) • Other items (net)
• Transfers (net) • Reserve money
• Official
• Private
Deposit Money Banks
Banks' reserves
• Net Foreign Assets
CAPITAL ACCOUNT Net domestic assets:
• Net credit to central
Direct investment
govt.
Medium/long-term • Credit to private sector
capital (net) • Other items (net)
Short-term capital (net) • Liabilities to monetary
Overall balance authorities
Change in net foreign Private sector deposits
assets
30
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
In a paper entitled “Balances, Imbalances and Fiscal Targets- a New Cambridge Model”
Wynne Godley and Alex Izurieta of the Cambridge Endowment for Research in Finance
(CERF), University of Cambridge used a simplified accounting matrix to illustrate the
interrelations of financial transactions among various sectors of the economy. They
argued that macroeconomic analysis would be easier if the main income and expenditure
flows comprising the GDP are arranged in a double entry format as in Table-1. The two-
way table indicates clearly the transactions among any two economic agents viz.
producers, consumers, government, and rest of the world. The matrix shows how the gap
between receipts and outlays of any sector implies an equivalent rise or fall in its net
acquisition of financial assets.
2.Gov. Exp +G -G 0
3.Exports +X -X 0
4.Imports -M +M 0
5.GDP +Y -Y 0
6. Taxes, -TP +T -TF 0
Fact. Pay.
7.Financial +NAFA 0 +PSNB -BP 0
Balances = Y-C-TP =T-G =M-X-TF
In this matrix the national income identity is shown, running vertically down in column 2,
as the appropriation account of a postulated production sector. It says that gross domestic
product, Y, is equal to private expenditure, C plus government expenditure, G, plus
exports, X, less imports, M. Every item in the GDP identity has a counterpart with the
opposite sign in some other column. Taxes less transfers, T, are received or paid by the
government; net property income, taxes and transfers, TF and TP, are paid by
respectively the external and private sectors. The total in line 7 shows that public
borrowing, PSNB, equals the private net acquisition of financial assets, NAFA, (that is
saving less investment, or net saving) minus the balance of payments surplus, BP or plus
the deficit. Wynne Godley and Alex Izurieta illustrated the analysis with the help of UK
and USA data. One important conclusion of the analysis is that the financial balances
(relative to income flows) must stay within certain limits for maintaining the
sustainability of public debt over time. This in turn implies that that a strict monitoring of
these basic balances is essential for formulation of effective macro stabilization policies.
31
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
2 Data Base
The basic data for 160 variables2 for the years 1975-20093 are obtained from the official sources.
Basic data on national accounts are obtained from the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), Nepal
supplemented by the data from the Nepal Rastra Bank. Data on government finance statistics are
obtained from the Nepal Ministry of Finance and the Nepal Rastra Bank. Data on monetary and
financial statistics and the balance of payments statistics are obtained from the Nepal Rastra Bank
supplemented by the data from the International Monetary Fund. Data on sectoral employment and
investment are estimated by the national consultants Prof. Durga Lal Shrestha and Prof. Vikas Raj
Satyal by using standard interpolation and extrapolation techniques on the basis of limited data
obtained from official sources. So the data base can be considered to be authentic and reliable.
It presents time series data on sectoral GDP at both current and constant 2000-01 prices in
national currency (millions of Nepalese rupee) for the years 1975-2009. It has data on both
broad sectors of the economy viz. agriculture, industry and services, and sub-sectors within
these broad sectors. No sub-sector is considered for Agriculture due to lack of long term
series, while industry is sub divided into four sub-sectors viz. mining and quarrying,
manufacturing, construction and public utilities (comprising electricity, gas and water
supply), and services sector is sub divided into four subsectors viz. wholesale and retail trade
and hotels and restaurants; transport, storage and communications; finance and insurance and
real estate; and social services (comprising health, education, public administration,
community, social and personal services).
Data on Balance of Payments for the years 1975-2009 are obtained from the Nepal Rastra
Bank, supplemented by the data from the IMF. Necessary adjustments have been made to
take care of changes in the basic concepts, definitions and classifications over the years.
Data on Monetary Survey, Financial Statistics and CPI for the years 1975-2009 are obtained
from the Research Department of the Nepal Rastra Bank.
Basic data on government financial statistics for the years 1975-2009 are taken from the
Nepal Rastra Bank supplemented by the data from the Ministry of Finance. Necessary
adjustments have been made to take care of changes in the basic concepts, definitions and
classifications over the years.
2.5 Basic Presumptions for Projections
2
The list of variables with descriptions is presented in Annex-1 in the proposed work plan.
3
The year 1975 refers to the fiscal year ending with mid-July 1975 i.e. the fiscal year from mid-July 1974 to
mid-July 1975. Similarly, the year 2009 refers to the fiscal year ending with mid-July 2009 i.e. the fiscal year
from mid-July 2008 to mid-July 2009.
32
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
As discussed in the Inception Report on Modeling prepared in October 2009, despite the
global financial crisis and economic recession, the Nepalese economy performed well in
2008 and achieved real growth of 5.3 percent aided by agricultural growth at 4.7 percent,
industrial growth at 1.8 percent and services growth at 7 percent. Inflation was contained at
7.7 percent and there was a surplus on the current account of the balance of payments. The
reasons for no significant adverse impact of global financial crisis on the Nepalese economy
include the following:
(a) Nepal’s financial sector has limited external liabilities and assets.
(b) Although its external current account has close links with the rest of the world, the
major link is with India which maintained relatively high growth rates during the
crisis period.
(c) Nepal and India also maintained normal trade links during the crisis period.
Although the global slowdown did not have much adverse impact on the Nepal’s financial
sector, the real sector growth in 2008/09 was affected adversely by the domestic factors such
as unfavorable monsoon, power shortage and labor unrest. The Central Bureau of Statistics
(CBS) has estimated that the real GDP growth rate at basic prices has decelerated from 5.3%
in FY2008 to 3.8% in FY2009. The slowdown is broad-based, encompassing agriculture,
industry and services. The agriculture sector is estimated to grow by only 2.2% in FY2009,
down from 4.7% in FY2008; industrial sector by 1.8% almost the same as 1.9% in FY2008;
and service sector by 5.8%, significantly down from 7.0% in FY2008.
There was significant acceleration of the consumer price inflation from 7.7% in 2008 to
13.2% in 2009 contributed by food inflation of 14.8 percent and non-food inflation of 9.8
percent. However, the fiscal situation and the balance of payments have surplus on current
accounts and macroeconomic fundamentals are sound. Both the government and the
monetary authority deserve to be complemented for maintaining economic stability in a
difficult socio-economic-political context.
There are now indications that these adverse factors also continued in 2010. As per the
estimates made by the ADB Nepal Resident Office, real GDP growth rate is expected to
“remain subpar at approximately 3.5% in FY2010 (16 July 2009 – 15 July 2010). Services
are expected to expand robustly, but may not sufficiently offset the weak performance of
industry and agriculture. Industrial growth may remain subdued due to continued political
disturbances, frequent power cuts, and fuel shortages. Assuming normal weather conditions
during the winter, agriculture output growth is also expected to decelerate from last year in
view of significantly reduced summer crop output due to poor weather”. There is liquidity
crunch in the banking sector caused by a number of factors such as decelerating remittances,
heavy imports and excessive lending by commercial banks. Fuelled by high import prices and
high CPI inflation in India, domestic inflation is also running at high levels, and challenging
macroeconomic stability during 2010. Consequently, there was upward trend of deposit and
lending rates in contrast to the declining trend in the recent past.
Despite the political turmoil and the labor unrest, both the government and the Nepal Rastra
Bank deserve complements for adopting sound macroeconomic and prudent monetary
policies to tackle the adverse impact of the global financial crisis and economic recession and
spiraling inflation in Nepal.
In the Budget estimate for 2010, the Ministry of Finance projected a rise of the expenditure
outlay by 37% and revenue by 37% over FY2009. Although the targets were ambitious, the
33
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
mid-term review of the budget carried out by the Ministry of Finance in February 2010
suggested that both expenditure and revenue targets are likely to be met.
Our forecasts of key macro-economic variables for the years 2011-2015 take into account the
developments in the current year 2010. We further assume that the transitional problems of
strikes and labor unrest will be solved by the next year. In addition, our projections are based
on the following presumptions:
3 Projection Techniques
Components of supply side of the GDP (i.e. sectoral value added) are projected on the basis
of the historical growth rates adjusted for large variations, if any. Other variables in the
model are estimated by elasticity with respect to nominal GDP at current market prices.
However, only individual items in different sub-models are projected by this method, while
the aggregates are estimated on the basis of standard identities and balance equations to
satisfy consistency among various variables and partial equilibrium within the system.
Basic methodology used is the standard time series analysis to estimate historical growth
rates on the basis of three kinds of time trend growth rates viz., least squares time trend
growth rate, exponential growth rate and simple average annual growth rate.
To start with, we estimate the average historical growth rate for each of 9 sub-sectors of GDP
(1 in agriculture, 4 in industry and 4 in services) viz. agriculture (Agr), mining and quarrying
(Min), manufacturing (Manf), public utilities (Utilities), construction (Const), wholesale and
retail trade (Trade), transport and communications (Trans), financial services (Fin), and social
sectors (Social) comprising health, education, public administration and community, religious
and personal services. Three kinds of growth rates, as indicated below, are estimated on the
basis of the past time series data for 1975-20094 and presented in the Appendix-2.
The IMF uses the Least-squares growth rates to forecast the country growth rates for their
World Economic Outlook (WEO) published twice in a year, wherever there is past data for at
least 9 years to permit a reliable calculation. The least-squares growth rate, r, is estimated by
4
Data are obtained from the official sources such as the Ministry of Finance, Nepal Rastra Bank and Central
Bureau of Statistics. Data on balance of payments for the past are supplanted by data from the International
Monetary Fund (IMF).
34
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
fitting a linear regression trend line to the logarithmic annual values of the variable in the
relevant period. The regression equation takes the form
Ln Yt = a + bt
Yt = Yo (1 + r)t
In this equation, Y is the variable, t is time, r is the trend growth rate, Ln is the natural
logarithm operator, and a = log Yo and b = Ln (1 + r) are the parameters to be estimated.
The calculated growth rate is an average rate that is representative of the available
observations over the entire period. It does not necessarily match the actual growth rate
between any two years.
The exponential growth rate between two points in time for a variable is calculated from the
following equation
where Yn and Y1 are the last and first observations in the period, n is the number of years in
the period, and Ln is the natural logarithm operator. This growth rate is based on a model of
continuous and exponential growth between two points in time. It does not take into account
the intermediate values of the series.
35
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
On the supply side, the projections of sectoral value added for the years 2010-2015 are done
on the basis of the minimum of the three types of growth rates as mentioned above. In
general, for most of the variables, the exponential growth rate is lower than the least squares
trend growth rate, which in turn is lower than the average annual growth rates. Thus the
exponential growth rate happens to be lowest growth rate and is taken for projecting the
sectoral GDP at both constant and current prices5. The same methodology is used to project
net indirect taxes (INDT, i.e. indirect taxes less subsidies and transfers). Thus we have,
YCST= YCSTAGR+YCSTIND+YCSTSER-YCSTFISM
YFC=YFCAGR+YFCIND+YFCSER-YFCSISM
YFCIND=YFCMIN+YFCMANF+YFCUTILITY+YFCCONST
YFCSER=YFCTRADE+YFCTRANS+YFCFIN+YFCSOCIAL
YMP=YFC+YINDTAX
YGNI = YMP+BOPINCOME
YGNDI=YGNI+BOPTRANSFER
As mentioned earlier, past data for the years 1975-2009 along with standard descriptive
statistics are presented in Appendix-1 and the projections of sectoral GDP at both current
and constant prices for the years 2010-2015 are presented in the Appendix-2. The latter
Tables also indicate the fitted regression lines log (Yt) = α + β Time and log (Yt) = α + β
log (GDPMPt) and the corresponding R2 for estimation of the trend growth rates of the
variables and the elasticity of the variable with respect to the GDP at current market prices.
5
It may also be possible that annual growth rates are volatile with high standard deviation
(SD) and co-efficient of variation (CV=SD/µ). Then the corresponding average annual
growth rates cannot hold good for the medium and long term. If for any variable, there is high
CV (say exceeding 200%), the projected growth rate can be modified on the basis of the
following formula:
Projected growth rate = Trend growth rate minus 25 percent of SD.
36
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
Yt = Yo (1 + r)t
LnYt = α + β LnGDPt
where Yt is the value of a variable in year t and GDPt is the nominal GDP at current market
prices in year t for the years 1990 to 2007. It is clear that β is the elasticity of the variable
with respect to GDP.
Projected growth rate for the variable for a year is estimated by the following relation:
Projected growth rate for a variable Y = β y,gdp times GRgdp
Where β y,gdp = elasticity of Y with respect to GDP (which is constant) and
GRgdp = Growth rate of GDP in year t (which may change over the years).
Appendix-2 presents the projections of all variables for the years 2010-2015 along with
resultant annual growth rates and the ratio of a variable to the GDP at the current market
prices. The table clearly indicates the projection method and the average growth rate with CV
for a variable for the projection period.
As mentioned earlier, trend growth rates are estimated by fitting exponential (semi-log)
time trends and elasticity of a variable with respect to GDP at current market prices is
estimated by fitting log-linear (double log) regression equations. The ordinary least
squares (OLS) method is used for fitting these relations. The goodness of fit is judged by
R2 which is observed to be very high for most of the variables (Appendix-2).
4. Summary Results
4.1-A Supply Side of Real Sector
(Annual Growth Rates in percentage)
37
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
4.2-A Growth rates of demand for Nominal GDP at current prices (in percentage)
Year/ Overall Consump- Private Public Investment GFCF
Items GDP (MP) tion Cons. Cons.
2007 11.3 10.2 9.5 17.7 16.6 9.5
2008 12.4 10.7 9.5 21.9 27.0 16.4
2009 17.3 21.5 20.3 31.3 9.6 18.1
2010 est. 15.0 15.1 15.0 15.7 17.8 16.6
2011 proj. 13.0 13.0 12.9 13.5 15.4 14.3
2012 proj. 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.6 15.5 14.4
2013 proj. 13.1 13.1 13.0 13.6 15.5 14.5
2014 proj. 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.7 15.6 14.5
2015 proj. 13.2 13.2 13.1 13.7 15.7 14.6
38
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
4.2-C Composition of demand for Nominal GDP at current prices (in percentage)
Year/ Overall Consump- Private Public Investment GFCF
Items GDP (MP) tion Cons. Cons.
2007 100.0 90.1 80.9 9.2 28.1 20.4
2008 100.0 88.8 78.8 10.0 31.8 21.1
2009 100.0 92.0 80.9 11.1 29.7 21.2
2010 est. 100.0 92.0 80.8 11.2 30.4 21.5
2011 proj. 100.0 92.0 80.8 11.3 31.1 21.8
2012 proj. 100.0 92.0 80.7 11.3 31.8 22.1
2013 proj. 100.0 92.0 80.7 11.4 32.4 22.3
2014 proj. 100.0 92.1 80.6 11.4 33.2 22.6
2015 proj. 100.0 92.1 80.6 11.5 33.9 22.9
4.2-D Composition of demand for Nominal GDP at current prices (in percentage)
Year/ Private Public Stocks Exports Imports GDP at FC
Items GFCF GFCF
2007 2.9 17.5 7.7 13.0 31.3 92.9
2008 3.1 18.0 10.7 12.1 32.7 92.5
2009 4.1 17.1 8.5 15.7 37.4 92.0
2010 est. 4.1 17.4 8.9 16.0 38.5 92.0
2011 proj. 4.0 17.8 9.3 16.3 39.4 92.0
2012 proj. 4.0 18.1 9.7 16.6 40.4 91.9
2013 proj. 3.9 18.4 10.1 16.9 41.4 91.8
2014 proj. 3.9 18.7 10.6 17.2 42.4 91.7
2015 proj. 3.8 19.1 11.0 17.5 43.4 91.7
39
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
40
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
41
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
42
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
43
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
TARUN DAS
MACROECONOMIC MODELING SPECIALIST
AND TEAM LEADER
44
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
Appendix-1
45
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
46
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
47
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
48
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
Appendix-2:
49
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
50
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
51
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
52
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
53
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
54
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
55
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
56
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
57
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
58
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
59
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
60
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
61
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
62
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
63
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
64
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
65
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
66
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
07
2,0 35,934 (29,675) 65 171,455 323,922 442,282 92,092
08
2,0 65,718 (41,280) 77 221,084 411,662 557,779 109,015
09
Descriptive Statistics
Mean 9,944 (488) 41 46,186 75,721 110,135 28,786
Median 6,320 561 43 20,792 24,878 41,609 19,002
Skewne 2.6 (2.2) 0.1 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.1
s
Kurtosis 9.0 6.1 (1.7) 1.5 3.0 2.2 0.3
Max 65718 16001 78 221084 411662 557779 109015
Min -2878 -41280 11 1029 949 1638 286
SD 13124 11106 26 56639 101171 141035 30113
CV (%) 132 -2276 62 123 134 128 105
67
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
68
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
07
2,0 7,317 342,873 (118,361) 495,377 495,377 154,344 100,175
08
2,0 6,468 442,296 (146,118) 632,745 632,745 196,461 125,760
09
Descriptive Statistics
Mean 5,909 75,439 (34,414) 121,907 121,907 41,581 28,033
Median 4,739 17,780 (16,731) 45,671 45,671 19,458 13,640
Skewne 1.1 1.9 (1.2) 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.4
s
Kurtosis 0.4 3.4 0.4 2.5 2.5 1.9 1.3
Max 19329 442296 -603 632745 632745 196461 125760
Min 511 716 -146118 2064 2064 1338 917
SD 5229 108248 40483 157315 157315 49370 32499
CV (%) 88 143 -118 129 129 119 116
69
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
70
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
07
2,0 54,169 341,033 146 132 143 154 4.3
08
2,0 70,701 436,284 164 151 156 171 4.8
09
Descriptive Statistics
Mean 13,548 80,326 61 61 68 57 7.1
Median 5,818 26,213 52 55 67 43 8.0
Skewne 1.8 1.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.9 (0.8)
s
Kurtosis 3.1 2.7 (0.7) (1.1) (1.4) (0.4) (0.9)
Max 70701 436284 164 151 156 171 9.5
Min 421 727 11 14 11 8 3.4
SD 16953 108041 45 41 46 48 2.0
CV (%) 125 135 74 67 68 85 28.5
71
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
72
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
07
2,0 4.3 4.8 6.5 10.0 10.0 8.3 8.3
08
2,0 6.0 6.1 6.5 10.8 10.8 8.8 11.0
09
Descriptive Statistics
Mean 9.8 10.8 11.3 14.0 13.4 12.3 15.6
Median 11.8 12.8 11.0 14.0 12.5 12.0 16.0
Skewne (0.6) (0.7) (0.4) 0.2 0.5 0.1 (0.7)
s
Kurtosis (1.0) (1.1) (1.5) (1.0) (0.7) (0.8) (0.8)
Max 15.0 16.0 15.0 18.5 18.0 18.0 19.5
Min 3.6 4.0 5.5 10.0 10.0 7.8 8.3
SD 3.5 3.8 3.7 2.5 2.3 2.9 3.5
CV (%) 35.9 35.4 32.5 17.9 17.4 23.4 22.2
73
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
74
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
07
2,0 200.2 196.9 204.0 7.7 10.1 5.0 6.3
08
2,0 226.7 226.0 224.0 13.2 14.8 9.8 12.4
09
Descriptive Statistics
Mean 85.2 83.8 87.1 8.1 8.1 8.0 8.0
Median 72.4 73.7 70.2 8.3 7.8 8.0 7.7
Skewne 0.6 0.6 0.6 (0.3) 0.3 (0.2) 0.1
s
Kurtosis (0.9) (0.8) (0.9) 0.8 (0.1) 1.1 0.9
Max 226.7 226.0 224.0 21.1 24.5 14.9 19.3
Min 15.4 14.8 15.3 (4.8) (3.9) (0.6) (1.7)
SD 62.3 61.1 63.5 5.3 6.3 3.2 4.1
CV (%) 73.1 73.0 72.9 65.1 77.9 39.6 51.1
75
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
76
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
07
2,0 7.2 7.5 5.2 100.2 205.0 141.7 160.9
08
2,0 14.9 9.1 11.2 70.0 220.0 157.0 173.2
09
Descriptive Statistics
Mean 7.1 8.4 9.5 29.2 68.3 62.3 69.7
Median 7.2 7.9 8.1 23.2 44.2 51.8 57.7
Skewne (0.0) 0.9 2.4 2.0 0.9 0.6 0.6
s
Kurtosis (0.0) 4.0 7.2 4.0 (0.3) (1.0) (0.7)
Max 18.9 31.2 36.3 100.2 220.0 157.0 173.2
Min (5.8) (9.4) 1.7 9.4 5.0 13.0 17.1
SD 5.4 6.9 7.1 20.2 65.3 43.1 46.4
CV (%) 76.4 82.2 74.7 69.2 95.7 69.3 66.5
77
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
Appendix-3:
78
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
79
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
80
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
81
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
82
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
83
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
84
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
85
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
86
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
87
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
88
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
89
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
90
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
91
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
92
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
93
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
94
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
95
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
96
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
97
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
98
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
99
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
100
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
APPENDIX-3:
Unit Root Tests (KPSS with trend)
Finding of the Unit Root Test on the set of variables in time series using
the method of KPSS (Kwiatkowski, Phillips, Schmidt, and Shin, 1992) is
presented below. All the tests are performed at the leveled form and with
trend and intercept. This test is based on the null hypothesis that the time
series being tested is stationary around a deterministic trend.
==================================================================
Notes: A variable will be stationary in KPSS test if it has the LM statistics is smaller than the
critical value at the desired level. For example, in table 1 below H0: AGCROPAREA is
stationary has LM= 0.15155 which is greater than 0.146 so Ho (AGCROPAREA is stationary)
is rejected at 10% level.
The stationary test of KPSS is a one-sided right-tailed test so that one rejects the
null of stationarity at the 100 · α% level if the KPSS test statistic is greater than
the 100 · (1 − α)% quantile from the appropriate asymptotic distribution. For
example, suppose for any variable the estimates KPSS statistic = 1.641, and 99%
quintile is 0.762. Since the KPSS statistic 1.641 is greater than the 99%
quantile, 0.762, the null that Vt is I(0) is rejected at the 1% level.
101
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
102
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
103
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
104
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
105
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
106
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
107
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
108
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
109
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
110
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
111
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
112
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
113
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
114
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
115
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
116
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
117
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
118
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
119
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
120
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
121
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
122
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
123
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
124
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
125
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
126
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
127
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
128
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
129
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
130
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
131
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
132
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
133
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
134
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
135
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
136
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
137
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
138
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
139
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
140
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
141
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
142
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
143
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
144
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
145
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
146
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
147
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
148
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
149
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
150
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
151
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
0.146000
0.119000
152
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
153
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
154
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
155
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
156
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
157
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
158
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
159
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
160
Monthly Activity/ Progress Report of Tarun Das, Macroeconomic Modeling Specialist
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
LM-Stat.
5% level 0.146000
161