Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The characteristics that effective leaders must apply is the ability to inspire and motivate
others to make a commitment. The key to motivating people lies in the ability to relate their
personal needs to the organizations goals and to inspiring people lies in the ability to relate what
Maslows Hierarchy of Needs array the basic human needs on five successive levels.
Esteem Needs
Social Needs
Safety/Security Needs
The lowest level in the hierarchy encompasses basic survival needs. People need air to breathe,
food to eat, water to drink, clothes to wear and shelter in which to live. The second level
encompasses safety/security needs which is feeling of safe from harm and secure in their life.
People enact laws, pay taxes to employ police and military personnel, buy insurance and install
security systems in their homes. The third level is social needs which is a fact manifests itself
through families, friendship, social organizations, civic groups and special clubs.
The fourth level is esteem needs. Self-esteem is a key ingredient in the personal
happiness of individuals. People need to feel self-worth, dignity and respect. People need to feel
their matter and can be seen in the clothes they wear and even the behavior people exhibit in
public. The highest level of Maslows hierarchy is self-actualization needs. Complete self-
fulfillment is a need that is rarely satisfied in people. The need of self-actualization manifests
itself in a variety of ways. Some people seek to achieve it through their work, others through
Leaders need to understand how to apply Maslows model to motivate and inspire their
asking and taking the time to establish trust. Inspiration, as a level of leadership, is on a higher
plane than motivation. Managers who become good enough leaders to inspire their workers will
LEADERSHIP STYLES
Leadership styles have to do with how people interact with those they seek to lead.
Autocratic Leadership
Autocratic leadership also known as directive or dictatorial leadership. People who take
this approach make decisions without consulting the employees who will have to implement
them or who will be affected by them. They tell others what to do and expect them to comply
obediently. Critics of this approach say that although it can work in the short run or in isolated
instances, in the long run it is not effective. Autocratic leadership is not appropriate in a total
quality setting.
Democratic Leadership
Democratic leadership is also called consultive or consensus leadership. People who take
this approach involve the employees who will have to implement decisions in making them. The
leader actually makes the final decision but only after receiving the input and recommendations
of team members. Critics of this approach say that the most popular decision is not always the
best decision and that democratic leadership, by its nature, can result in the making of popular
decisions, as opposed to right decisions. This style can also compromises that ultimately fail to
Participative Leadership
take this approach exert little control over the decision-making process. They provide
information about the problem and allow team members to develop strategies and solutions. The
underlying assumption of this style is that workers will more readily accept responsibility for
solutions, goals and strategies that they are empowered to help develop. Critics of this approach
say consensus building is time consuming and works only if all people involved are committed
Goal-Oriented Leadership
take this approach ask team members to focus solely on the goals at hand. Only strategies that
discussed. Critics of this approach say it can break down when team members focus so intently
on specific goals that they overlook opportunities or potential problems that fall outside of their
narrow focus.
Situational Leadership
Situational leadership also known as fluid or contingency leadership. People who take
this approach select the style that seems to be appropriate based on the circumstances that exist at
a given time. To identify the circumstances, leaders consider the following factors:
These factors are considered, the manager decides whether to take the autocratic,
manager would apply a different leadership style. Advocates of total quality reject situational
Leaders build and maintain followership by earning the respect of those they lead. The
characteristics of leaders that build respect are first sense of purpose where the successful leaders
have a strong sense of purpose. Second, Successful leaders develop discipline because through
it leaders could avoid negative self-indulgence, inappropriate displays of emotion such as anger
Third, successful leaders are trusted by their followers because they are open, honest and
forthright with other members of the organization and with themselves. Fourth, credibility is
established by being knowledgeable, consistent, fair and impartial in all human interaction by
setting a positive example and by adhering to the same standards of performance and behavior
expected of others. Next, successful leaders must have common sense which is important in a
given situation and what is not. Leaders know that applying tact is important when dealing with
Then, successful leaders must have stamina. They need to be the first to arrive and the
last to leave. Energy, endurance and good health are important to those who lead. Successful
leaders are committed to the goals of the organization, the people they work with and their own
ongoing personal and professional development. They are willing to do everything within the
limits of the law, professional ethics and company policy to help their team succeed. The final
characteristic is steadfastness and resolute. It means that people do not follow a person they
perceive to be wishy-washy and noncommittal. Successful leaders must have the steadfastness
John P. Kotter, What Leaders Really Do, Harvard Business Review (December 1, 2001):3
(Produ # R0111-PDF-ENG)