2. Zone concerned in RW P-2 3. Proposal Construction of Silkyara Bend Tunnel from Km. 25.400 to Km. 51.00 of NH-134 (Old NH-94) of district Uttarkashi in the state of Uttarakhand. 4. Existing carriageway width (including length). Carriageway (in m) Length (in km) 3.75 25.6 5. Proposed Tunnel construction 4.851 km long /7.0m with 1.5m Paved Shoulder on both sides with approach road of carriageway width (including shoulder width) 6. Funding under Plan/Non-Plan. Plan 7. Under which scheme. Chardham 8. Last work of original nature done New work on the stretch. 9. Defect Liability Period, up-to 4 years what date/year. 10. Type of maintenance work done N/A in view of para-8 last. 11. Year during which the above N/A maintenance work was completed. 12. Is the proposed work premature? No 13. If so, the reasons for the same. N/A 14. Defect Liability Period proposed 4 years for the instant work. 15. Traffic on the stretch. 1100 PCU, based on the traffic census carried out in 2014-2015. 16. Whether being tolled or N/A proposed to be tolled. 17. Length of the proposed stretch. 4.851 km (Including approach road 4.531 km long tunnel + 320 m long approach road 18. Major/Minor structures being Minor Bridges: 1 no.(Reconstruction) proposed for original Slab Culverts: 1 no. (New Construction) work/repair on the stretch. 19. Total cost of the project. 1131.24 Crore 20. Phasing. Year Physical Financial 2017-18 13.2 % 149.47 Crore
2018-19 11.90 % 134.60 Crore
2019-20 30.90% 349.89 Crore
2020-21 44 % 497.27 Crore
21. Per Km. Cost of the project. N/A
22. Per Km. Cost of the road work. N/A 23. Per Km. Cost/cost of other N/A structures on the stretch. 24. If cost is on the higher side, the Construction of Tunnel will provide all weather reasons for the same. connectivity between Silkyara and Barkot without compromising with nature. It will ease traffic flow and provide smooth passage to destination. It will significantly reduce time hence less consumption of fuel and carbon emission. 25. Is LA/Utility shifting involved, if LA cost is included while there is no utility shifting is envisaged. so, the details. 26. Whether feasibility report/DPR Yes available. 27. The status of the adjoining N/A stretch (including last treatment thereof, length of the stretch, year of completion of the project). 28. Whether the stretch is identified. Chardham under NHDP/NHIP/or some other scheme. 29. If so, whether status of the N/A proposal under NHDP indicated, and file referred with justification, with the approval of DG (RD). 30. BOS (with all relevant details) N/A
31. Whether file seen by IFD earlier No
(page number of note portion). 32. If so, whether its N/A queries/observations have been duly responded to 33. Whether included in approved Yes Annual Plan of the year. 34. Special features, if any, of the Construction of 4.531 Bi-directional Tunnel with Egress pass and proposal. parallel ventilation system.