CUADRO PRECIPITACIONES TOTALES ANUALES CORREGIDAS POR ANALISIS DE

1 2 3 4 5 6
CASAPALCA SANTA EULALIA NIMA COLQUI MATUCANA TAMBORAQUE BELLAVISTA
AO PTA PTA PTA PTA PTA PTA
1946 904.60 212.50 1360.00 416 731.20 858.60
1947 826.10 182.80 1266.60 363.5 641.20 765.00
1948 934.80 217.60 1410.00 394.6 754.30 839.20
1949 718.10 148.50 1122.40 280.9 533.00 627.50
1650 845.60 204.60 1292.50 442.8 698.10 895.00
1951 362.30 59.80 650.50 161.2 231.10 353.10
1952 811.10 181.90 1246.80 277.9 629.90 592.00
1953 866.40 202.90 1319.10 399 698.90 820.10
1954 829.60 199.60 1272.30 386.9 662.70 805.20
1955 618.80 132.90 990.50 267.9 467.80 560.80
1956 547.40 117.80 897.50 215.4 405.50 461.30
1957 521.90 80.60 863.60 209.7 372.10 448.30
1958 626.00 177.80 1001.90 197.6 453.30 425.80
1959 950.10 221.40 1428.60 329.6 766.50 698.10
1960 615.90 128.10 984.60 160.1 457.00 358.50
1961 992.50 249.70 1384.00 515.1 842.70 1227.60
1962 579.20 119.90 935.30 398.4 420.20 822.30
1963 906.00 229.90 1444.10 376.6 750.40 770.90
1964 624.70 129.60 995.40 235.2 471.40 494.20
1965 429.03 98.57 1265.89 150.1 484.90 331.80
1966 742.98 148.20 1414.60 331 491.40 697.60
1967 706.10 251.07 1400.04 447.9 581.20 735.90
1968 322.80 127.94 1177.10 211.2 239.60 471.80
1969 239.90 108.43 950.37 232.5 412.70 528.30
1970 551.02 192.27 999.17 282.4 537.00 600.00
1971 477.57 115.70 756.66 308.9 547.90 625.50
1972 397.19 210.15 1242.77 390.6 507.40 588.20

ESTACION CASAPALCA

Ao N dato Tm t Txt (Tmi - Tm)2 (ti-t)2

1946 1 904.60 1 904.60 57537.78 169.00
1947 2 826.10 2 1652.20 26040.38 144.00
1948 3 934.80 3 2804.40 72937.98 121.00
1949 4 718.10 4 2872.40 2848.39 100.00
1650 5 845.60 5 4228.00 32714.08 81.00
1951 6 362.30 6 2173.80 91463.71 64.00
1952 7 811.10 7 5677.70 21424.27 49.00
1953 8 866.40 8 6931.20 40670.92 36.00
1954 9 829.60 9 7466.40 27182.23 25.00
1955 10 618.80 10 6188.00 2109.53 16.00
1956 11 547.40 11 6021.40 13766.25 9.00
1957 12 521.90 12 6262.80 20400.31 4.00
1958 13 626.00 13 8138.00 1499.99 1.00
1959 14 950.10 14 13301.40 81436.23 0.00
1960 15 615.90 15 9238.50 2384.34 1.00
1961 16 992.50 16 15880.00 107433.39 4.00
1962 17 579.20 17 9846.40 7315.32 9.00
1963 18 906.00 18 16308.00 58211.37 16.00
1964 19 624.70 19 11869.30 1602.37 25.00
1965 20 429.03 20 8580.60 55554.24 36.00
1966 21 742.98 21 15602.57 6123.03 49.00
 1967 22 706.10 22 15534.20 1711.50 64.00
1968 23 322.80 23 7424.50 116912.90 81.00
1969 24 239.90 24 5757.70 180476.75 100.00
1970 25 551.02 25 13775.41 12930.68 121.00
1971 26 477.57 26 12416.89 35027.79 144.00
1972 27 397.19 27 10724.24 71575.35 169.00
n= 27

Tm t t .T m (Tmi T m )2 (tit )2
664.73 14.00 8428.91 1149291.09 1638.00

STm= 210.24629
St= 7.93725
R= -0.52572
Bm = -13.92546
Am= 859.68612

Am Bm
859.69 -13.92546
R -0.52572
ANALISIS DE LA MEDIA

I) HIPOTESIS
Hipotesis Planteada : =0
Hipotesis Alterna : 0
Tcal = 3.09
Nivel de Significacia : 5 %
Como n-2 = 25
Entonces
Ttab = 2.06
Comparando:
Tcalc > Ttab

II) CONCLUSION
Como : Tcal > Ttab
ACEPTAMOS LA H. ALTERNA
El coeficiente de correlacion es significativo al
95% de probabilidades
Se debe corregir los datos

CASAPALCA PTA
CORREGIDO
AO PTA
1946 904.60 723.57
1947 826.10 658.99
1948 934.80 781.62
1949 718.10 578.85
1650 845.60 720.27
1951 362.30 250.90
1952 811.10 713.62
1953 866.40 782.85
1954 829.60 759.97
1955 618.80 563.10
1956 547.40 505.62
1957 521.90 494.05
1958 626.00 612.07
1959 950.10 950.10
1960 615.90 629.83
1961 992.50 1020.35
1962 579.20 620.98
1963 906.00 961.70
1964 624.70 694.33
1965 429.03 512.58
1966 742.98 840.46
1967 706.10 817.50
1968 322.80 448.13
1969 239.90 379.16
1970 551.02 704.20
1971 477.57 644.68
1972 397.19 578.22
RREGIDAS POR ANALISIS DE SALTOS
7 8 9 10
TICLIO CARAPOMA LAGUNA QUISHA MILLOC
PTA PTA PTA PTA
995.10 461.60 1504.2 1139.2
888.00 420.20 1391.5 1041.3
971.90 479.30 1373.2 1157.1
730.20 353.80 1148.9 903.8
1035.60 442.40 1558.6 1065.1
416.70 157.70 728.9 456.9
689.50 409.80 1094.4 1021.8
949.60 443.10 1443.9 1091.2
933.00 425.60 1421.3 1045.8
653.90 307.00 1082.4 778.5
540.20 265.80 894.4 689.5
592.90 257.10 874.5 657.4
624.50 322.40 841.2 788.5
875.50 494.60 1256.8 1196.9
631.70 302.90 737.1 775.9
834.20 530.90 1970.6 1250
636.70 278.40 1247.2 729.8
760.70 477.30 1368.4 1141.3
665.20 313.10 944.9 774.2
680.50 217.10 675.4 899.91
650.80 377.90 1256.4 1200.99
707.80 495.60 1314.7 1233.57
486.30 185.00 910.3 760.16
618.00 325.80 1037.3 589.79
685.70 408.60 893.8 1029.45
730.00 468.40 991.4 954.08
685.10 85.00 1179.5 786.46

ESTACION SANTA EULALIA

Ao N dato Tm t Txt (Tmi - Tm)2

1946 1 212.50 1 212.50 204511.67
1947 2 182.80 2 365.60 232256.21
1948 3 217.60 3 652.80 199924.94
1949 4 148.50 4 594.00 266493.07
1650 5 204.60 5 1023.00 211719.31
1951 6 59.80 6 358.80 365939.91
1952 7 181.90 7 1273.30 233124.49
1953 8 202.90 8 1623.20 213286.64
1954 9 199.60 9 1796.40 216345.61
1955 10 132.90 10 1329.00 282842.80
1956 11 117.80 11 1295.80 299132.06
1957 12 80.60 12 967.20 341207.47
1958 13 177.80 13 2311.40 237100.50
1959 14 221.40 14 3099.60 196541.20
1960 15 128.10 15 1921.50 287971.40
1961 16 249.70 16 3995.20 172249.63
1962 17 119.90 17 2038.30 296839.37
1963 18 229.90 18 4138.20 189076.84
1964 19 129.60 19 2462.40 286363.76
1965 20 98.57 20 1971.40 320536.77
1966 21 148.20 21 3112.26 266799.75
 1967 22 251.07 22 5523.47 171116.95
1968 23 127.94 23 2942.53 288147.22
1969 24 108.43 24 2602.42 309464.70
1970 25 192.27 25 4806.85 223214.48
1971 26 115.70 26 3008.19 301433.99
1972 27 210.15 27 5674.07 206641.99
n= 27

Tm t t .T m (Tmi T m )2
164.82 14.00 2262.94 6820282.74

STm= 512.17045
St= 7.93725
R= -0.01097
Bm = -0.70775
Am= 174.73205

Am Bm
174.73 -0.70775
R -0.01097
ANALISIS DE LA MEDIA

I) HIPOTESIS
Hipotesis Planteada : =0
Hipotesis Alterna : 0
Tcal = 0.05
Nivel de Significacia : 5 %
Como n-2 = 25
Entonces
Ttab = 2.06
Comparando:
Tcalc < Ttab

II) CONCLUSION
Como : Tcal < Ttab
ACEPTAMOS LA H. PLANTEADA
Es decir : El coeficiente de correlacion no es
significativo
 ESTACION NIMA COLQUI

(ti-t)2 Ao N dato Tm t Txt

169.00 1946 1 1360.00 1 1360.00
144.00 1947 2 1266.60 2 2533.20
121.00 1948 3 1410.00 3 4230.00
100.00 1949 4 1122.40 4 4489.60
81.00 1650 5 1292.50 5 6462.50
64.00 1951 6 650.50 6 3903.00
49.00 1952 7 1246.80 7 8727.60
36.00 1953 8 1319.10 8 10552.80
25.00 1954 9 1272.30 9 11450.70
16.00 1955 10 990.50 10 9905.00
9.00 1956 11 897.50 11 9872.50
4.00 1957 12 863.60 12 10363.20
1.00 1958 13 1001.90 13 13024.70
0.00 1959 14 1428.60 14 20000.40
1.00 1960 15 984.60 15 14769.00
4.00 1961 16 1384.00 16 22144.00
9.00 1962 17 935.30 17 15900.10
16.00 1963 18 1444.10 18 25993.80
25.00 1964 19 995.40 19 18912.60
36.00 1965 20 1265.89 20 25317.77
49.00 1966 21 1414.60 21 29706.51
 64.00 1967 22 1400.04 22 30800.95
81.00 1968 23 1177.10 23 27073.39
100.00 1969 24 950.37 24 22808.97
121.00 1970 25 999.17 25 24979.21
144.00 1971 26 756.66 26 19673.22
169.00 1972 27 1242.77 27 33554.92
n= 27

(tit )2 Tm t t .T m
1638.00 1150.83 14.00 15870.73

STm= 544.57445
St= 7.93725
R= -0.05572
Bm = -3.82287
Am= 1204.34655

Am Bm
1204.35 -3.82287
R -0.05572
ANALISIS DE LA MEDIA

I) HIPOTESIS
Hipotesis Planteada : =0
Hipotesis Alterna : 0
Tcal = 0.28
Nivel de Significacia : 5 %
Como n-2 = 25
Entonces
Ttab = 2.06
Comparando:
Tcalc < Ttab

II) CONCLUSION
Como : Tcal < Ttab
ACEPTAMOS LA H. PLANTEADA
Es decir : El coeficiente de correlacion no es
significativo
UI ESTACION MATUCANA

(Tmi - Tm)2 (ti-t)2 Ao N dato Tm t

483400.83 169.00 1946 1 416.00 1
362247.89 144.00 1947 2 363.50 2
555427.86 121.00 1948 3 394.60 3
209462.13 100.00 1949 4 280.90 4
394095.59 81.00 1650 5 442.80 5
202.48 64.00 1951 6 161.20 6
338805.87 49.00 1952 7 277.90 7
428200.53 36.00 1953 8 399.00 8
369141.71 25.00 1954 9 386.90 9
106126.31 16.00 1955 10 267.90 10
54182.03 9.00 1956 11 215.40 11
39549.41 4.00 1957 12 209.70 12
113683.83 1.00 1958 13 197.60 13
583497.88 0.00 1959 14 329.60 14
102317.03 1.00 1960 15 160.10 15
517349.81 4.00 1961 16 515.10 16
73208.30 9.00 1962 17 398.40 17
607418.11 16.00 1963 18 376.60 18
109342.87 25.00 1964 19 235.20 19
361391.66 36.00 1965 20 150.10 20
562299.43 49.00 1966 21 331.00 21
 540685.89 64.00 1967 22 447.90 22
262527.37 81.00 1968 23 211.20 23
81592.47 100.00 1969 24 232.50 24
111849.22 121.00 1970 25 282.40 25
8451.61 144.00 1971 26 308.90 26
334136.39 169.00 1972 27 390.60 27
n= 27

(T mi T m )2 (tit )2 Tm t
7710594.50 1638.00 310.48 14.00

STm= 374.64083
St= 7.93725
R= -0.03509
Bm = -1.65638
Am= 333.67078

Am Bm
333.67 -1.65638
R -0.03509
ANALISIS DE LA MEDIA

I) HIPOTESIS
Hipotesis Planteada : =0
Hipotesis Alterna : 0
Tcal = 0.18
Nivel de Significacia : 5 %
Como n-2 = 25
Entonces
Ttab = 2.06
Comparando:
Tcalc < Ttab

II) CONCLUSION
Como : Tcal < Ttab
ACEPTAMOS LA H. PLANTEADA
Es decir : El coeficiente de correlacion no es
significativo
ON MATUCANA ESTACION TAMBORAQUE

Txt (Tmi - Tm)2 (ti-t)2 Ao N dato Tm

416.00 61866.45 169.00 1946 1 731.20
727.00 90739.31 144.00 1947 2 641.20
1183.80 72970.04 121.00 1948 3 754.30
1123.60 147325.22 100.00 1949 4 533.00
2214.00 49252.78 81.00 1650 5 698.10
967.20 253542.13 64.00 1951 6 231.10
1945.30 149637.19 49.00 1952 7 629.90
3192.00 70612.26 36.00 1953 8 698.90
3482.10 77189.33 25.00 1954 9 662.70
2679.00 157473.79 16.00 1955 10 467.80
2369.40 201897.15 9.00 1956 11 405.50
2516.40 207052.00 4.00 1957 12 372.10
2568.80 218210.13 1.00 1958 13 453.30
4614.40 112311.90 0.00 1959 14 766.50
2401.50 254651.10 1.00 1960 15 457.00
8241.60 22389.04 4.00 1961 16 842.70
6772.80 70931.49 9.00 1962 17 420.20
6778.80 83018.71 16.00 1963 18 750.40
4468.80 184495.74 25.00 1964 19 471.40
3002.00 264843.70 36.00 1965 20 484.90
6951.00 111375.49 49.00 1966 21 491.40
 9853.80 47015.11 64.00 1967 22 581.20
4857.60 205689.16 81.00 1968 23 239.60
5580.00 186822.49 100.00 1969 24 412.70
7060.00 146175.98 121.00 1970 25 537.00
8031.40 126614.75 144.00 1971 26 547.90
10546.20 75147.08 169.00 1972 27 507.40
n= 27

t .T m (Tmi T m )2 (tit )2 Tm
4242.39 3649249.50 1638.00 547.76

STm= 197.70017
St= 7.93725
R= -0.23694
Bm = -5.90159
Am= 630.37778

Am Bm
630.38 -5.90159
R -0.23694
ANALISIS DE LA MEDIA

I) HIPOTESIS
Hipotesis Planteada : =0
Hipotesis Alterna : 0
Tcal = 1.22
Nivel de Significacia : 5 %
Como n-2 = 25
Entonces
Ttab = 2.06
Comparando:
Tcalc < Ttab

II) CONCLUSION
Como : Tcal < Ttab
ACEPTAMOS LA H. PLANTEADA
Es decir : El coeficiente de correlacion no es
significativo
ESTACION TAMBORAQUE ESTACION BE

t Txt (Tmi - Tm)2 (ti-t)2 Ao N dato

1 731.20 4418.30 169.00 1946 1
2 1282.40 553.65 144.00 1947 2
3 2262.90 8022.84 121.00 1948 3
4 2132.00 17352.71 100.00 1949 4
5 3490.50 1113.58 81.00 1650 5
6 1386.60 188034.69 64.00 1951 6
7 4409.30 1213.11 49.00 1952 7
8 5591.20 1167.61 36.00 1953 8
9 5964.30 4.12 25.00 1954 9
10 4678.00 38781.30 16.00 1955 10
11 4460.50 67200.02 9.00 1956 11
12 4465.20 85632.12 4.00 1957 12
13 5892.90 44702.51 1.00 1958 13
14 10731.00 10357.20 0.00 1959 14
15 6855.00 43151.62 1.00 1960 15
16 13483.20 31673.44 4.00 1961 16
17 7143.40 59794.76 9.00 1962 17
18 13507.20 7339.41 16.00 1963 18
19 8956.60 37376.36 25.00 1964 19
20 9698.00 32338.71 36.00 1965 20
21 10319.40 30043.17 49.00 1966 21
 22 12786.40 6977.21 64.00 1967 22
23 5510.80 180735.24 81.00 1968 23
24 9904.80 63518.95 100.00 1969 24
25 13425.00 16314.87 121.00 1970 25
26 14245.40 13649.17 144.00 1971 26
27 13699.80 24752.63 169.00 1972 27
n= 27

t t .T m (T mi T m )2 (tit )2
14.00 7296.78 1016219.28 1638.00

STm= 205.33102
St= 7.93725
R= -0.22475
Bm = -5.81405
Am= 725.93745

Am Bm
725.94 -5.81405
R -0.22475
ANALISIS DE LA MEDIA

I) HIPOTESIS
Hipotesis Planteada :
Hipotesis Alterna :
Tcal = 1.15
Nivel de Significacia : 5 %
Como n-2 =
Entonces
Ttab = 2.06
Comparando:
Tcalc <

II) CONCLUSION
Como : Tcal < Ttab
ACEPTAMOS LA H. PLANTEADA
Es decir : El coeficiente de correlacion no es
significativo
 ESTACION BELLAVISTA

Tm t Txt (Tmi - Tm)2 (ti-t)2 Ao

858.60 1 858.60 37585.70 169.00 1946
765.00 2 1530.00 10054.14 144.00 1947
839.20 3 2517.60 30439.90 121.00 1948
627.50 4 2510.00 1386.05 100.00 1949
895.00 5 4475.00 53024.42 81.00 1650
353.10 6 2118.60 97113.05 64.00 1951
592.00 7 4144.00 5289.60 49.00 1952
820.10 8 6560.80 24139.94 36.00 1953
805.20 9 7246.80 19731.91 25.00 1954
560.80 10 5608.00 10801.38 16.00 1955
461.30 11 5074.30 41383.63 9.00 1956
448.30 12 5379.60 46841.80 4.00 1957
425.80 13 5535.40 57087.39 1.00 1958
698.10 14 9773.40 1113.58 0.00 1959
358.50 15 5377.50 93776.61 1.00 1960
1227.60 16 19641.60 316823.01 4.00 1961
822.30 17 13979.10 24828.41 9.00 1962
770.90 18 13876.20 11272.14 16.00 1963
494.20 19 9389.80 29080.37 25.00 1964
331.80 20 6636.00 110842.17 36.00 1965
697.60 21 14649.60 1080.46 49.00 1966
 735.90 22 16189.80 5065.22 64.00 1967
471.80 23 10851.40 37221.86 81.00 1968
528.30 24 12679.20 18613.05 100.00 1969
600.00 25 15000.00 4189.93 121.00 1970
625.50 26 16263.00 1538.97 144.00 1971
588.20 27 15881.40 5856.79 169.00 1972
n=

Tm t t .T m (Tmi T m )2 (tit )2
644.54 14.00 8657.29 1096181.47 1638.00

STm=
St=
R=
Bm =
Am=

Am
850.54
R
SIS DE LA MEDIA ANALISIS DE LA MEDIA

) HIPOTESIS I) HIPOTESIS
=0 Hipotesis Planteada :
0 Hipotesis Alterna :
Tcal =
Nivel de Significacia : 5 %
25 Como n-2 =
Entonces
Ttab =
Comparando:
Ttab Tcalc

CONCLUSION II) CONCLUSION

Tcal < Ttab Como :
OS LA H. PLANTEADA ACEPTAMOS LA H. ALTERNA
ciente de correlacion no es El coeficiente de correlacion es significativ
significativo 95% de probabilidades
Se debe corregir los datos

AO
1946
1947
1948
1949
1650
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
 ESTACION TICLIO

N dato Tm t Txt (Tmi - Tm)2 (ti-t)2

1 995.10 1 995.10 109144.55 169.00
2 888.00 2 1776.00 49849.64 144.00
3 971.90 3 2915.70 94353.61 121.00
4 730.20 4 2920.80 4286.36 100.00
5 1035.60 5 5178.00 137544.80 81.00
6 416.70 6 2500.20 61518.72 64.00
7 689.50 7 4826.50 613.57 49.00
8 949.60 8 7596.80 81151.10 36.00
9 933.00 9 8397.00 71968.97 25.00
10 653.90 10 6539.00 117.28 16.00
11 540.20 11 5942.20 15507.64 9.00
12 592.90 12 7114.80 5159.50 4.00
13 624.50 13 8118.50 1618.43 1.00
14 875.50 14 12257.00 44424.13 0.00
15 631.70 15 9475.50 1090.96 1.00
16 834.20 16 13347.20 28720.19 4.00
17 636.70 17 10823.90 785.66 9.00
18 760.70 18 13692.60 9210.30 16.00
19 665.20 19 12638.80 0.22 25.00
20 680.50 20 13610.00 248.70 36.00
21 650.80 21 13666.80 194.04 49.00
 22 707.80 22 15571.60 1855.05 64.00
23 486.30 23 11184.90 31837.15 81.00
24 618.00 24 14832.00 2183.66 100.00
25 685.70 25 17142.50 439.75 121.00
26 730.00 26 18980.00 4260.22 144.00
27 685.10 27 18497.70 414.95 169.00
27

Tm t t .T m (T mi T m )2 (tit )2
728.49 14.00 9649.67 758499.18 1638.00

170.80119
7.93725
-0.40513
-8.71787
850.54280

Bm
-8.71787
-0.40513
ANALISIS DE LA MEDIA

I) HIPOTESIS
potesis Planteada : =0
potesis Alterna : 0
2.22
vel de Significacia : 5 %
25

2.06

> Ttab

II) CONCLUSION
Tcal > Ttab
ACEPTAMOS LA H. ALTERNA
El coeficiente de correlacion es significativo al
95% de probabilidades
Se debe corregir los datos

TICLIO PTA
CORREGIDO
PTA
995.10 881.77
888.00 783.39
971.90 876.00
730.20 643.02
1035.60 957.14
416.70 346.96
689.50 628.47
949.60 897.29
933.00 889.41
653.90 619.03
540.20 514.05
592.90 575.46
624.50 615.78
875.50 875.50
631.70 640.42
834.20 851.64
636.70 662.85
760.70 795.57
665.20 708.79
680.50 732.81
650.80 711.83
707.80 777.54
486.30 564.76
618.00 705.18
685.70 781.60
730.00 834.61
685.10 798.43
 ESTACION CARAPOMA

Ao N dato Tm t Txt (Tmi - Tm)2 (ti-t)2

1946 1 461.60 1 461.60 41261.66 169.00
1947 2 420.20 2 840.40 59794.76 144.00
1948 3 479.30 3 1437.90 34384.16 121.00
1949 4 353.80 4 1415.20 96677.26 100.00
1650 5 442.40 5 2212.00 49430.48 81.00
1951 6 157.70 6 946.20 257079.09 64.00
1952 7 409.80 7 2868.60 64989.14 49.00
1953 8 443.10 8 3544.80 49119.71 36.00
1954 9 425.60 9 3830.40 57183.00 25.00
1955 10 307.00 10 3070.00 127970.52 16.00
1956 11 265.80 11 2923.80 159144.88 9.00
1957 12 257.10 12 3085.20 166161.95 4.00
1958 13 322.40 13 4191.20 117189.60 1.00
1959 14 494.60 14 6924.40 28944.10 0.00
1960 15 302.90 15 4543.50 130920.71 1.00
1961 16 530.90 16 8494.40 17910.38 4.00
1962 17 278.40 17 4732.80 149250.61 9.00
1963 18 477.30 18 8591.40 35129.88 16.00
1964 19 313.10 19 5948.90 123643.42 25.00
1965 20 217.10 20 4342.00 200372.32 36.00
1966 21 377.90 21 7935.90 82271.26 49.00
 1967 22 495.60 22 10903.20 28604.85 64.00
1968 23 185.00 23 4255.00 230140.56 81.00
1969 24 325.80 24 7819.20 114873.32 100.00
1970 25 408.60 25 10215.00 65602.41 121.00
1971 26 468.40 26 12178.40 38545.34 144.00
1972 27 85.00 27 2295.00 336086.49 169.00
n= 27

Tm t t .T m (Tmi T m )2 (tit )2
359.50 14.00 4815.05 2862681.87 1638.00

STm= 331.81795
St= 7.93725
R= -0.08273
Bm = -3.45867
Am= 407.91770

Am Bm
407.92 -3.45867
R -0.08273
ANALISIS DE LA MEDIA

I) HIPOTESIS
Hipotesis Planteada : =0
Hipotesis Alterna : 0
Tcal = 0.42
Nivel de Significacia : 5 %
Como n-2 = 25
Entonces
Ttab = 2.06
Comparando:
Tcalc < Ttab

II) CONCLUSION
Como : Tcal < Ttab
ACEPTAMOS LA H. PLANTEADA
Es decir : El coeficiente de correlacion no es
significativo
 ESTACION LAGUNA QUISHA

Ao N dato Tm t Txt (Tmi - Tm)2

1946 1 1504.2 1 1504.20 704710.43
1947 2 1391.5 2 2783.00 528195.11
1948 3 1373.2 3 4119.60 501930.21
1949 4 1148.9 4 4595.60 234420.91
1650 5 1558.6 5 7793.00 799004.17
1951 6 728.9 6 4373.40 4117.83
1952 7 1094.4 7 7660.80 184616.59
1953 8 1443.9 8 11551.20 607106.40
1954 9 1421.3 9 12791.70 572398.66
1955 10 1082.4 10 10824.00 174448.50
1956 11 894.4 11 9838.40 52748.46
1957 12 874.5 12 10494.00 44003.59
1958 13 841.2 13 10935.60 31141.78
1959 14 1256.8 14 17595.20 350547.28
1960 15 737.1 15 11056.50 5237.46
1961 16 1970.6 16 31529.60 1705297.32
1962 17 1247.2 17 21202.40 339271.69
1963 18 1368.4 18 24631.20 495151.93
1964 19 944.9 19 17953.10 78495.41
1965 20 675.4 20 13508.00 113.86
1966 21 1256.4 21 26384.40 350073.78
 1967 22 1314.7 22 28923.40 422461.43
1968 23 910.3 23 20936.90 60304.79
1969 24 1037.3 24 24895.20 138808.65
1970 25 893.8 25 22345.00 52473.22
1971 26 991.4 26 25776.40 106713.50
1972 27 1179.5 27 31846.50 264988.49
n= 27

Tm t t .T m (Tmi T m )2
1153.38 14.00 15475.86 8808781.46

STm= 582.06468
St= 7.93725
R= -0.14533
Bm = -10.65755
Am= 1302.58354

Am Bm
1302.58 -10.65755
R -0.14533
ANALISIS DE LA MEDIA

I) HIPOTESIS
Hipotesis Planteada : =0
Hipotesis Alterna : 0
Tcal = 0.73
Nivel de Significacia : 5 %
Como n-2 = 25
Entonces
Ttab = 2.06
Comparando:
Tcalc < Ttab

II) CONCLUSION
Como : Tcal < Ttab
ACEPTAMOS LA H. PLANTEADA
Es decir : El coeficiente de correlacion no es
significativo
 ESTACION MILLOC

(ti-t)2 Ao N dato Tm t Txt

169.00 1946 1 1139.2 1 1139.20
144.00 1947 2 1041.3 2 2082.60
121.00 1948 3 1157.1 3 3471.30
100.00 1949 4 903.8 4 3615.20
81.00 1650 5 1065.1 5 5325.50
64.00 1951 6 456.9 6 2741.40
49.00 1952 7 1021.8 7 7152.60
36.00 1953 8 1091.2 8 8729.60
25.00 1954 9 1045.8 9 9412.20
16.00 1955 10 778.5 10 7785.00
9.00 1956 11 689.5 11 7584.50
4.00 1957 12 657.4 12 7888.80
1.00 1958 13 788.5 13 10250.50
0.00 1959 14 1196.9 14 16756.60
1.00 1960 15 775.9 15 11638.50
4.00 1961 16 1250 16 20000.00
9.00 1962 17 729.8 17 12406.60
16.00 1963 18 1141.3 18 20543.40
25.00 1964 19 774.2 19 14709.80
36.00 1965 20 899.91 20 17998.11
49.00 1966 21 1200.99 21 25220.76
 64.00 1967 22 1233.57 22 27138.54
81.00 1968 23 760.16 23 17483.66
100.00 1969 24 589.79 24 14155.06
121.00 1970 25 1029.45 25 25736.15
144.00 1971 26 954.08 26 24806.00
169.00 1972 27 786.46 27 21234.41
n= 27

(tit )2 Tm t t .T m
1638.00 931.80 14.00 12852.07

STm= 347.94476
St= 7.93725
R= -0.06993
Bm = -3.06550
Am= 974.71694

Am Bm
974.72 -3.06550
R -0.06993
ANALISIS DE LA MEDIA

I) HIPOTESIS
Hipotesis Planteada : =0
Hipotesis Alterna : 0
Tcal = 0.35
Nivel de Significacia : 5 %
Como n-2 = 25
Entonces
Ttab = 2.06
Comparando:
Tcalc < Ttab

II) CONCLUSION
Como : Tcal < Ttab
ACEPTAMOS LA H. PLANTEADA
Es decir : El coeficiente de correlacion no es
significativo
(Tmi - Tm)2 (ti-t)2
225122.09 169.00
141805.21 144.00
242428.54 121.00
57154.62 100.00
160296.40 81.00
43193.17 64.00
127499.22 49.00
181876.94 36.00
145214.60 25.00
12943.69 16.00
613.57 9.00
53.72 4.00
15319.09 1.00
283205.26 0.00
12358.84 1.00
342541.36 4.00
4234.15 9.00
227119.28 16.00
11983.75 25.00
55307.72 36.00
287573.72 49.00
 323579.34 64.00
9106.78 81.00
5615.36 100.00
133017.93 121.00
83721.88 144.00
14818.20 169.00

(Tmi T m )2 (tit )2
3147704.45 1638.00