Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
We have introduced the Wigner rotation. We represented special and most general Lorentz transformations. The
velocity addition formula for special and most general Lorentz transformations are clearly explained. We have derived the
formula of Wigner rotation in two different ways. We have calculated the numerical values of Wigner rotation for
different cases. The graph of the Wigner rotation with respect to different velocities has plotted
KEYWORDS: Special Lorentz Transformation; Most General Lorentz Transformation; Lorentz Transformation; Velocity
Addition Formula Most General Lorentz Transformation; Velocity Addition Formula Special Lorentz Transformation;
Wigner Rotation. PACS: 03.30. + P
Received: Feb 18, 2017; Accepted: May 31, 2017; Published: Jun 13, 2017; Paper Id.:IJPRJUN20171
Original Article
1. INTRODUCTION
Wigner rotation results from the formation of two non-collinear Lorentz boosts that is not a pure boost, but
is the composition of a boost and a rotation. This rotation is known as Thomas rotation, ThomasWigner
rotation or Wigner rotation. The rotation was discovered by Thomas in 1926[1]and derived by Wigner in
1939[2]. When a sequence of non-collinear boosts returns the spatial origins of a sequence of inertial frame to the
starting point, then the sequence of Wigner rotations combine to produce a net rotation called the Thomas
, and e where the frame S is the lab frame which is
precession [3].Consider four inertial frames of references S ,
r
at rest and the frame is moving with uniform velocity U with respect to S, is moving with uniform velocity
r r
V with respect to , e is moving with uniform velocity W respect to . We want to find the velocity of the
electron with respect to lab frame S. There are two ways to get the velocity of electron with respect to lab frame.
( )
r r r r
Firstly, we can take the Lorentz sum of U and V i.e. U V (where denotes the Lorentz sum) and then we
( ) ( )
r r r r r r r
can take the Lorentz sum of U V and W i.e. U V W . Secondly, we can take the Lorentz sum of V
(r ) ( ) ( )
r r r r r r r r
and W i.e. V W and then, we can take the Lorentz sum of U and V W i.e. U V W . The angle
( ) ( )
r r r r r r
between these two velocities U V W and U V W is Wigner rotation.
www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org
2 MD. Tarek Hossain& MD. Shah Alam
2. LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION
The transformation which relates the observations of position and time made by the two observers in two different
inertial frames is known as Lorentz transformation.
Let us consider two inertial frame of references S and S, where the frame S is at rest and the frame S is moving
along x-axis with velocity v with respect to S frame. The space and time coordinates of S and S are (x, y, z, t) and (x, y,
z, t) respectively. The relation between the coordinates of S and S, which is called special Lorentz Transformation, can
be written as [5-8]
vx
t (1)
x vt c2
x = , y = y , z = z, t =
2
v v2
1 1 2
c2 c
And
v x
t +
x + v t c2 (2)
x = , y = y , z = z , t =
2
v v2
1 1 2
c2 c
Special Lorentz Transformation is one dimensional. The velocities of moving frames are along x-axis. So, there is
no Wigner rotation Special Lorentz Transformation.
Figure 4: The Frame S is at Rest and the Frame S is Moving with Respect to
r
S with Uniform Velocity v Along any Arbitrary Direction
www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org
4 MD. Tarek Hossain& MD. Shah Alam
r r
When the velocity v of S with respect to the S is not along x-axis i.e. the velocity v has three components vx, vy
and vz then the relation between the coordinates of S and S, which is called most general Lorentz transformation, can be
written as [5, 8-10]
r r r r r
X = X + v [{( X . v )/v2}{(1 v2/c2) 1/2 1} t(1 v2/c2) 1/2] (3)
r r
t = (1 v2/c2)1/2 (t X . v /c2)
and
r r
r r r ( X . V )
X = X + V ( 1) t
V
2
(4)
( )
r r
t = t X . V
1
r r
V2
= 1 and V = V
2
Where, = 1 ,c
c2
r r
Here X and X is the space part of the S and S frame respectively.
Consider three inertial frames of reference S , S and S where the frame S is at rest and the frame S is
moving along X-axis with velocity v with respect to S frame and the frame S is moving along X-axis with velocity u
with respect to S . Then,
x x + v t
=
t v x
t + 2
c
x + t v
or, w = t t
t +x v
t t
x
Putting u= we have
t
u+v
w= (5)
1+ u v
Equation (5) is the relativistic or Einstein velocity addition theorem for special Lorentz transformation.
Consider three inertial frames of reference S , S and S where the frame S is at rest and the frame S is moving
r r
with velocity v with respect to S frame and the frame S is moving with velocity u with respect to S frame. From the
equation (4), we have
r
r r ( X . vr )
r X + v 2
( 1) + t
X
= v
t ( r r
t + X . v ) (6)
r r
r r (u . v )
u + v 2 ( 1) +
r
w= v
(1 + u . v )
r r (7)
r r
1
X r X v2 2
Where w = ,u = , = 1 2
t t c
Equation (7) is the relativistic velocity addition theorem for most general Lorentz transformation.
www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org
6 MD. Tarek Hossain& MD. Shah Alam
3.3 Relativistic Velocity Addition Formula of Most General Lorentz Transformation in the Case of Perpendicular
Velocities
Let us consider the special cases of perpendicular velocities between Alice and Bob,Alice is moving with velocity
r r
v1 with respect to mission control and Bob is moving with velocity v 2 with respect to Alice, as shown in Figure 7. The
r
velocityof Bob is supposed to read v 21 by mission control using equation (7)it can be written as,
r r v v cos 90 0
v 2 + v1 1 2 2 { 1 1} + 1
r v2 1
v 21 = Where 1 =
( )
and c=1.
1 1 + v1v 2 cos 90 0
v
2
(1 12 )
c
v 2 + v1 ( 1 )
r r
r
v 21 =
1
r
r r v r r
v 21 = v1 + 2 = v1 + v 2 1 v12 (8)
1
r
Similarly,using equation (7) the relativistic combination of velocities v12 can be written as,
r r v1v 2 cos 90 0
v1 + v 2 2 { 2 1} + 2
r v1 1
v12 = Where 2 =
(
2 1 + v1v 2 cos 90 0
) v
2
(1 22 )
c
v1 + v 2 ( 2 )
r r
r
v12 =
2
r
r r v1 r r
v12 = v 2 + = v 2 + v1 1 v 22 (9)
2
These formulas are extremely useful to introduce the concept of relativistic ally combining velocities.
3.4 Relativistic Velocity Addition Formula of Most General Lorentz Transformation in the Case of Parallel
velocities
r r v v cos 0 0
v 2 + v1 1 2 2 { 1 1} + 1
r
v 21 = v2 Where = 1
( )
and c=1.
1 1 + v1v 2 cos 0 0 1
2
v
(1 12 )
c
r r
r v +v
v 21 = 1 r 2r
1 + v1 v 2
r
Using equation (7) the relativistic combination of velocities v12 can be written as,
r r v v cos 0 0
v1 + v 2 1 2 2 { 2 1} + 2
r v1 1
v12 = Where 2 =
(
2 1 + v1v 2 cos 0 )
0
v
2
(1 22 )
c
r r
r v1 + v 2
v12 = r r
1 + v1 v 2
So we can write,
r r
r r v1 + v 2
v 21 = v12 = r r (10)
1 + v1 v 2
r r
Here c = 1. The magnitudes of the two combined velocities v 21 and v12 are the same, and hence there will be no
resulting Wigner rotation or Thomas precession.
www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org
8 MD. Tarek Hossain& MD. Shah Alam
We have derived the formula of Wigner rotation in two ways. Initially we have calculated change of Wigner
rotation of Bob with respect to mission control. Later, we have calculated Wigner rotation of , and e.
r r r r
v 21 v12 , But v12 = v 21 = v12 + v 22 v12 v 22 (11)
r r
In subfigure 10a), we decompose the velocity v 2 of Bob as measured by Alice into the components v 2 1
and
r r r
v 2 1 , parallel and perpendicular to v1 respectively. The relativistic ally combined velocity v 21 is the velocity of Bob as
o ro
seen by mission control. In subfigure 10b), we see the S frame, which is observed to have velocity v1 by mission
r r o
control, which represents the relativistic combination of velocities v 2 1 and v1 . In the S frame Bob is measured to have
r o ro
velocity v 2 , perpendicular to v1 .
r r
As v 2 1
and v1 are collinear by (10) the velocity of S o as measured by mission control is
r r r r
ro v 2 1 + v1 v 2 1 + v1
v1 = r r = r r (12)
1 + v 2 1 v1 1 + v1 .v 2
There is no Wigner rotation of the S o frame relative to mission control. Therefore, we can think of a new situation, as
o r0
illustrated in Figure 10b), where we have S moving at velocity v1 relative to mission control, and Bob moving at some
r 0 o r0 r 0
velocity v 2 as measured in the S frame. Since v1 and v 2 are perpendicular then we can write,
ro r
v 2 = 21 v 21 (13)
1
2 1
=
Where 1 v22 1
r
Thus, as mission control sees S o moving at velocity v1 0 , and the observer S o sees Bob to be moving at the
r r
perpendicular velocity v2 = 21v2 1 , we see that the velocity of Bob with respect to mission control is given by
o
r r r
v21 = v1o + 2o 1 v2 1
1 (14)
r 1 r r
1o = = 2 1 1 (1 + v1 .v 2 ) (15)
1 v ( ) o 2
1
r r r
r v1 + v 2 1
+ 1 v12 v 2 1
v 21 . = r r
1 + v1 .v 2
r
r r r r v1
1 .v1 + v 2 + ( 1 1)( v1 .v 2 )
r v12
v 21 = r r
1 (1 + v1 .v 2 )
www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org
10 MD. Tarek Hossain& MD. Shah Alam
r r r
r v1 + (1 11 )v 2 1 + 11v 2
v 21 = r r
1 + v1 .v 2 (16)
Similarly, we find
r r r
r v 2 + v1 2
+ 1 v 22 v1 2
v12 = r r
1 + v1 .v 2
r
r r r r v2
2 .v 2 + v1 + ( 2 1)( v1 .v 2 )
r v 22
v12 = r r
2 (1 + v1 .v 2 )
r r r
r v 2 + (1 21 )v1 2 + 21v1
v12 = r r
1 + v1 .v 2 (17)
similar procedure to
These are the most elementary formulae for the composition of general velocities.We use a
r r 2 r r
v1 + v2 v1 v2
2
r r r r
consider the Wigner rotation, where we must have v 21 = v12 . v 21 = v12 = r r
1 + v1 .v2 (18)
As previously described for the perpendicular case, the Wigner rotation angle is exactly the angle between
r r
v 21 and v12 as measured by mission control.
r r
The Wigner rotation angle then follows from the cross-product of the vectors v 21 and v12 . Using (16), (17) and
(18)we can write,
r r r r
v 21 v12 = v 21 v12 sin (19)
r r r r r 2 r r r r 2 r r
v1 + (1 11 )v 2 1 + 11v 2 vr + (1 1 )vr + 1vr v1 + v 2 v1 v 2
2
v1 + v 2 v1 v 2
2
r r 2 2
r r
1 2 2 1
= r r r r sin
1 + v1 .v 2 1 + v1 .v 2 1 + v1 .v 2 1 + v1 .v 2
r r r r r r
(v 2 + (1 21 )v1 2 + 21v1 ) (v1 + (1 11 )v 2 1
+ 11v 2 )
sin = r r 2 r r 2
v1 + v 2 v1 v 2
r r r r r r
(v 2 + (1 21 )v1 2 + 21v1 ) (v1 + (1 11 )v 2 1
+ 11v 2 )
sin = r r 2 r r 2 (20)
v1 + v 2 v1 v 2
r r
r r 1 1 (v1 v 2 )
(1 1 2 + (v1 v 2 )(
1 1
+ )+ 1
1 11
1 2
1
(1 1 )(1 2 )
1
r 1 r r
12 = r 2 = 1 2 (1 + v1 v 2 )
1 v12
rearranged to give
12 1 2
cos =
v1v 2 1 2
r r
r r 1 1 (v1 v 2 )
(1 1 2 + (v1 v 2 )(
1 1
+ )+ 1
1 11
1 2
1
(1 1 )(1 2 )
1
v1v 2 1 2 (1 + 1+ 2 + 12 )
sin = sin
( 1+1)( 2+1)( 12+1)
v v (1 + 1+ 2 + 12 )
= sin 1 1 2 1 2 sin
( 1+1)( 2+1)( 12+1)
Which, some may recognize as Stapp's elegant formula [28]. Similarly, using the definition of the dot-product to
find the Wigner rotation angle , one finds
r r
r r 2 r r 2 1 1 (v1 v 2 )
v1 + v 2 v1 v 2 ( + ) 1
1 1 1 2 (1 1 )(1 2 )
1 1 1
cos = r r 2 r r 2
v1 + v 2 v1 v 2
( 12 + 1+ 2 + 1) 2
cos + 1 =
( 1+1)( 2+1)( 12+1)
( 12 + 1+ 2 + 1) 2
cos = 1
( 1+1)( 2+1)( 12+1)
( + + + 1) 2
= cos 1 12 1 2 1
( 1+1)( 2+1)( 12+1)
(22)
Equation (22) is the Wigner rotation angle between the Bob and Alice.
www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org
12 MD. Tarek Hossain& MD. Shah Alam
Let us consider the Alice velocity 0.4C, which is constant, and the different velocity of Bob and corresponding
Wigner rotation values calculated using equation (22) in the following table.
Table 1
Bob Velocity Wigner Rotation
0.3c 4.320
0.4c 4.830
0.5c 6.400
0.6c 7.980
0.7c 9.840
0.8c 11.890
0.9c 14.890
The Alice velocity is constant 0.4C and the change of Bob velocity with respect to change of Wigner rotation as
shown in the figure 11.
16
14
o
Wigner rotation in
12
10
4
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
Bob velocity in unit of C
Figure 11: The Change of Wigner Rotation with Respect to Different Bob Velocity
r r Ur .Vr
V +U (
2 ( U 1) + U
)
r r r U
W = U V = r r
U 1+ U. V ( ) (23)
r r
Now, if muon moves with velocity W with respect to lab frame and electron moves with velocity W respect to
muon,then according to the velocity addition, formula for the most general Lorentz transformation [13] we can write
r r
r r (W . W )
W + W ( Wr 1) + Wr
W r r
2
r r r
W = W W =
Wr (1 + W . W ) (24)
)( ) (
r r r
r r U V . W
r
(
W + U V r r 2 (Ur Vr ) 1 + (Ur Vr ) )
(
r r
)
or , U V W =
r (
U V )
( )
r r r
(U V ) (1 + U V . W )
r r
Again, from moun and electron according to the velocity addition formula for most general Lorentz
r r
transformation [29-30] the resultant velocity of V and W can be written as
r r
r r (V .W )
W +V 2
( V 1) V (25)
r r r V
W = V W = r r
V (1 + V . W )
r
Finally, if electron moves with velocity W with respect to piont, then the resultant velocity [29] electron with
respect to lab frame can be written as
r r
r r (U . W )
W +U 2
( U 1) U
r r r U
W = U W = r
U (1 + U . W )
( )
r r r (26)
( )
r r r U . V W
V W +U ( U 1) U
( )
2
r r r U
or ,U V W = r r r
U 1 + . V W .U ( ( ) )
Specifically, to illustrate Wigner rotation for velocity vectors in unit of c are defined as,
1 1 1
u = = 1.18678, v = = 1.23091, U V = = 8.45154
1U 2 1V 2 (
r r
1 U V )2
0.7237
( )
r r r r
From equation (23) and (24) we have U V W = 0.96175 = A (say)
0
www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org
14 MD. Tarek Hossain& MD. Shah Alam
6.65228
( )
r r r r
From equation (25) and (26) we get U V W = 5.17574 = B (say)
0
r r
A . B = AB cos
r r
1 A . B
We know that
= cos
AB
r
Where A = 0.7237 i + 0.96175 j + 0 k , A = (0.7237 )2 + (0.96175 )2 = 1.20362
r
And B = 6.65228 i + 5.17574 j + 0 k , B = (6.65228 )2 + (5.17574 )2 = 8.428589
r r
A . B = 9.792
Again let,
Be two sets of velocity vectors of pion decay chain e , as figure 1 then using equations (23),(24),(25)
( ) ( )
r r r r r r
and (26) we have the velocity vectors of electron relative to lab frame, U V W and U V W are
Using similar process as previous we have the Wigner rotations in this case
= cos 1 (0.99296) = 7.17 o (App.) and = cos 1 (0.9995) = 1.8o (App.) respectively.
5. CONCLUSIONS
We have derived the formula of Wigner rotation in two different ways. We have observed that there is no Wigner
rotation for two linear Lorentz boosts. We have calculated the numerical values of Wigner rotation for different cases. We
have observed that the Wigner rotation increases due to the increase of velocity.
REFERENCES
6. A RBaizid and M SAlamAmerican Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 2(5) 153-163 (2012)
8. A R Baizid and M S AlamInternational Journal of Reciprocal Symmetry and Theoretical Physics Volume 1, No 1 (2014)
12. J. D. Jackson (Wiley, New York), 3rd ed., pp. 548553, 563564, 571 (1998)
14. H. Arzelie`s, Relativistic Kinematics (New York pp. 173180, 198, 201203) (1966)
15. H. Goldstein, C. Poole, and J. Safko Classical Mechanics (Addison Wesley, New York, 3rd ed.) pp. 282285 (2002)
17. J. D. Jackson Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 3rd ed.) pp. 548553, 563564, 571(1998)
19. H. Arzelie`s Relativistic Kinematics New Yorkpp. 173180, 198, 201203 (1966)
24. C W Misner, K S Thorne and J A Wheeler Gravitation (San Francisco, CA: Freeman) pp 175176 (1973)
www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org