Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
STRATEGIC ANALYSIS
OF
Submitted by:
Sir,Rana Waseem
Faculty of NCBA&E University
Table of Contents
1- Introduction of UNILEVAER
2- Company Summary
2.1- Vision
2.2- Mission
2.3- Objectives
3- Internal and External Audit
4- The Input Stage
4.1- EFE matrix
4.2- IFE Matrix
5- The Matching Stage
5.1- SWOT Matrix
5.2- SPACE Matrix
5.3- BCG Matrix
5.4- IE Matrix
5.5- Grand Strategy Matrix
6- The Decision Stage.
6.1- QSPM Matrix
7- Strategic Recommendation
8- References
Introduction
Unilever is one of the world's leading suppliers of fast moving consumer goods across
Foods and Home and Personal Care categories. Unilever's portfolio includes some of
the world's best known and most loved brands.
Unilever Pakistan (70.4% Unilever equity) is the largest FMCG company in Pakistan,
as well as one of the largest multinationals operating in the country. Unilever Pakistan
Ltd., a subsidiary of the Unilever Group is operating in Pakistan since 1948. The
Companys main business lines are Soaps and Detergents, Personal Products, Cooking
Oils and Fats, Packed Teas, and Ice Creams. Unilever has a long list of brands such as
Surf, Vim, Rin, Lifebuoy, Sunlight, Lux, Rexona, Sunsilk, Close-Up, Blue-Band,
Dalda, Planta, Liptons Yellow Label, Taaza and Richbru, Brook Bonds Supreme and
Kenya Mixture etc. which are common household names in Pakistan.
The Companys factory at Rahim Yar Khan was one of the first industrial units to be
constructed after the creation of Pakistan. As the consumer base expanded over the
years and the Company entered into new product lines like Personal Products and
Margarine, it invested further in the installation of modern manufacturing facilities
including a factory at Karachi. Today, the Company is using latest state-of-the-art
technology for producing high quality products.
In 1995, the Company established a new factory near Lahore to manufacture the
Walls range of ice creams, which have become popular within a short time. In 1996,
the present group Unilever UK acquired the Polka Group that produced ice creams.
In 1999, Pakistan industrial promoters (Private) Limited, owners of Polka brands of
Ice Cream were merged with Lever.
The company had a turnover of Rs. 23.3 bn (Euro 309 mn) in 2007, and enjoys a
leading position in most of its core Home and Personal Care and Foods categories,
e.g. Personal Wash, Personal Care, Laundry, Beverages (Tea) and Ice Cream.
The company operates through 5 regional offices, 4 wholly owned and 6 third party
manufacturing sites across Pakistan.
Since the time Unilever Pakistan began its operations in 1948, the Company has been
closely connected to the Pakistani people and its brands have been an integral feature
in their daily lives. In fact, the nature of our business enables our brands to be the
pulse and heartbeat of the 164 million people in Pakistan.
This is a huge commitment, which makes us responsible and accountable to all our
stakeholders and society as a whole and strengthens our resolve to:
Our Vision
Our Mission
Mission Is To Add Vitality To Life. We Meet Everyday Needs For Nutrition, Hygiene
and Personal Care With Brands That Help People Feel Good, Look Good and Get
More Out Of Life.
150 million times a day, in 150 countries, people use our products at key moments of
their day. In the future, our brands will do even more to add vitality to life. Our
vitality mission will focus our brands on meeting consumer needs arising from the
biggest issues around the world today ageing populations, urbanisation, changing
diets and lifestyles.
Our deep roots in local cultures and markets around the world give us our strong
relationship with consumers and are the foundation for future growth. We will bring
our wealth of knowledge and international expertise to the service of local consumers
- a truly multi-local multinational - extract from Unilevers Corporate purpose.
Strengths:
Customers Loyalty.
Latest state of the art facilities and technology for producing high quality
products.
Weaknesses:
Strategic alliance with other small mills for manufacturing purpose is the
weakness as well as a threat for UNILEVER. Although UNILEVER claims
that it is a part of its cost reduction strategy but it can not hide the reality that it
shows weakness of UNILEVER.
Opportunities:
Threats:
P & G is the major competitor and threat for UNILEVER. Other organized
players are Nestle and R & B.
Legal, political and regulatory factors of host country. For example, supportive
Government policies for attracting FDI, 1% tax rate on corporate profit and
inability of Pakistan Government to control smuggled products etc.
Although UNILEVER has a first mover advantage in ice cream segment but
Engro has announced to enter in ice cream segment and is considering a big
rival post CY2010.
Rapid increase in raw material cost and supply disruptions from suppliers of
raw material. The unprecedented surge in palm oil, tallow prices and other
materials has resulted in declining margins. Going forward, high raw material
costs are a key risk to UNILEVERs profitability.
EFE Matrix
Weighted
Key External Factors Weight Ratings
Score
OPPORTUNITIES
Market of developing countries due to more
1. 0.15 4 0.60
tendency towards consumption
2. Rapid increase in worlds population. 0.15 3 0.45
3. Unrelated diversification. 0.10 1 0.10
4. Rural area. 0.05 4 0.20
5. Hygiene Consciousness 0.10 2 0.20
THREATS
1. Competition from organized players, P & G 0.15 4 0.60
2. Inflation Rate 0.08 2 0.16
3. Smuggled products and local competition. 0.07 2 0.14
Legal, political and regulatory factors of host
4. 0.05 2 0.10
country.
5. Rapid increase in raw material cost. 0.10 4 0.40
Total Weighted Score 1.0 2.95
Ratings:
1 Poor 3 Above Average
2 Below Average 4 Superior
Total weighted score of EFE matrix of UNILEVER (2.95) shows strong response of
company towards external factors.
Justification of ratings:
On opportunity side:
1. It is a general observation that people of developing countries like Pakistan are
more inclined towards consumption rather than saving and the major portion
of spending is on FMCG.
4. The under penetrated rural market offers tremendous growth potential as rural
population constitutes around 60% of the total population. In the past few
years, favorable structural changes, such as double digit growth in agricultural
credit, increased penetration of television cable media have boosted demand
for FMCG products. Following table shows that rural population will be
almost 50% of total population in near future.
On threats side:
1. P & G with 50% market share is a big threat for UNILEVER. Nestle with
roundly 30% market share is also posing a threat in near future. Engro is
planning to enter in ice cream market and a future rival in ice cream as well.
2. Rapid increase in inflation rate can increase the prices of products and hence
can reduce demand.
4. Economic system of host country and rapid increase in raw material cost are
last two major threats for UNILEVER.
IFE Matrix
Weighted
Key Internal Factors Weight Ratings
Score
STRENGTHS
1. Customers Loyalty. 0.15 4 0.60
2. Micro level retail outlets 0.10 4 0.40
3. Latest state of the art facilities and technology. 0.10 4 0.40
4. International brand strength. 0.08 3 0.24
5. Market share of 41% 0.12 3 0.36
Committed to business ethics, safety, health,
6. environment and community. 0.10 3 0.30
WEAKNESSES
1. Strategic Alliance 0.15 1 0.15
2. Costly Products. 0.15 2 0.30
3. Operational Complexity. 0.05 1 0.05
Total Weighted Score 1.0 2.80
The score 2.80 shows that company has solid internal position, its strengths are
overcoming the weaknesses.
Ratings:
1 Major Weakness 3 Minor Strength
2 Minor Weakness 4 Major Strength
Justification of ratings:
On strength side:
1. Customers loyalty is not a hidden fact in UNILEVER case. People have
developed and adopted the taste of UNILEVERs high quality products and
there is no comprise on quality. 150 million times a day, in 150 countries,
people use UNILEVERs products at key moments of their day.
3. UNILEVERs continuous expansion and its large market share indicate their
strength in latest facilities and quality management. UNILEVER has ISO
certification.
On weakness side:
1. Although UNILEVER claims that strategic alliance with small firms for
manufacturing purpose is the part of its reducing cost objective but if we look
at the other side of the picture, strategic alliance is a weakness as well as threat
for UNILEVER. For example, Asad Soap Factory is manufacturing soap for
UNILEVER Rahim Yar Khan, and now Asad soap factory is searching for
buyers of soap plant.
STRENGHTS WEAKNESSES
1. Customers Loyalty. 1. Strategic Alliance
2. Micro level retail outlets 2. Costly Products.
3. Latest state of the art
facilities and technology. 3. Operational Complexity.
4. International brand
SWOT / TOWS Matrix strength.
5. Market share of 41%
6. Committed to business
ethics, safety, health,
environment and community.
4. Customers in rural areas and in developing countries usually have low income
level. UNILEVER should reduce its costs in order to capture that uncovered
markets effectively.
5. UNILEVER can use its international brand strength and wide network of retail
outlets in order to compete with organized and unorganized players of market.
7. If UNILEVER can obtain cheaper raw material, it can reduce cost of goods
manufactured.
SPACE Matrix
Total: +11
Industry Strength (IS)
Total: +11
Competitive Advantages (CA)
Total -9
Environmental Stability (ES)
Total: -17
Average scores:
FS = 11/5 = 2.2
IS = 11/4 = 2.75
CA = -9/5 = -1.8
ES = -17/5 = -3.4
X-axis = IS+CA = 2.75-1.8 = 0.95
Y-axis = FS+ES = 2.2-3.4 = -1.2
FS
+6
CA -6 + 0.95 +6 IS
-1.2
Competitive
Strategy
-6
ES
1. Product development
2. Market Development
Company will use Product Development to increase sales by slightly modifying its
products. It would eliminate its threat from unorganized market competitors which are
selling smuggled items and hurting the market of UNILEVER quite badly.
Following are some factors that prove why I choose this strategy for UNILEVER:
UNILEVERs existing products are very much successful across the globe. Its
41% market share shows the number of satisfied customers.
UNILEVER has both organized and un-organized rivals. Organized rivals are
competing by introducing comparable prices and un-organized rivals are
hurting UNILEVER by selling even at lower of the cost.
Market development is another strategy suggested for UNILEVER, weve seen that
UNILEVER is producing high quality products and captured the maximum market
share. But still lots of lower and middle income people are out of its user for most of
the products as they are highly priced. Rural area is also an untapped market for
UNILEVER. UNILEVER must consider about producing low-priced products as well
so company can earn maximum share.
BCG Matrix
Market Share
Ice cream
Knorr
INDUSTRY
SALES
GROETH
RATE (%) Detergents Dove
Medium 0
Beverages (Tea)
Soap
Low -20
Industry Classification:
Unilever has the first mover advantage in the capital intensive ice cream segment.
With around 65% market share, ULEVER is the only major operator in the industry.
The company is in the process of increasing production capacity and strengthening
its distribution channel. In CY07, sales were restricted by lost trade confidence, delay
in factory expansion resulting in plant shutdowns, and adverse weather conditions.
However, going forward with per capita consumption at a low 0.5 liters per annum
tremendous growth potential exists in the ice cream segment.
We expect segment revenue growth of CAGR 19% in CY08-CY12E.
According to matrix, UNILEVERs frozen foods like Knorr and some products of
household care business units like Dove are question marks as they are operating in a
growing market without high market share, thus holding the sales growth of the
companys 400 leading brands by 0.6%.
Therefore it can be noticed that not the whole divisions are under performing, as a
result UNILEVER needs to invest more in these business units to keep up with the
fast growing market because they are already successful but need better performance.
Brands such as Knorr and Lipton in food and Dove in the household product sector
are among the core brands that raise concern for UNILEVER. As they operate in a
growing market more investment is needed to boost sales and margin and as it is
unlikely that these units achieve sufficient cost reduction benefits, UNILEVER may
turn to its cash cow businesses to offset such investment.
As part of its path to growth strategy UNILEVER must build on these businesses to
improve performance as the market share must grow if they are to become stars
otherwise they may face alternative solutions that could include the sale of the
business, which should be the last alternative because of the growing divisions inside
the business.
UNILEVER might be better off investing more cash in frozen foods and household
care; since the market is growing it may gain more share and dominance
The mature tea segment continues to follow a declining trend as ULEVER faces stiff
competition in the tea market. ULEVER continues to lose sales volume to Tapal in
organized sector and to small local brands in rural areas that are using cheap
smuggled tea. Supply disruptions as a result of political turmoil and drought in Kenya
ensue in squeezed margins.
The companys strategy is to defend losing market share as no growth is expected in
beverages segment. ULEVER had two production facilities for tea located in Karachi
and Khanewal. Recently, ULEVER has closed down the Karachi tea factory in view
of low demand and sales volumes.
This is expected to result in restructuring charges in the short run, however, in the
long run the company is expected to benefit in terms of cost efficiencies and reduced
overheads.
In the backdrop of losing market share, the contribution of tea business to total
turnover has declined over the years (34% in CY09). Going forward, the tea segment
is expected to remain under pressure. It is forecasted a flat outlook for the segment
with decline in turnover of 5-6% each year.
Internal-External Matrix
3.0 iv v vi
Medium
Low 2.0
vii viii ix
1.0
The IFE matrix score for UNILEVER is 2.80 and for EFE matrix score is 2.95
therefore our IE matrix falls more around v cell.
The company should adopt HOLD & MAINTAIN STRATEGIES and I recommend
Market Development and Product Development for UNILEVER. UNILEVER can
introduce existing products to new geographical area that are rural markets and
markets of developing nations. On the other hand UNILEVER can also modifying its
existing products and introduce variants in order raise its market share.
Rapid
Rapid Market
market Growth
Growth
Q2 Q1
Weak Strong
Competitive Competitive
Position Position
Q3 Q4
QSPM Matrix
Market Product
Development Development
Attractive Attractive
External Factors Weight Total Total
Score Score
Untapped Rural area. 0.05 4 0.20 --- ---
Market of developing countries. 0.15 3 0.15 --- ---
Rapid increase in worlds 0.15 4 0.60 1 0.15
population.
Hygiene Consciousness 0.10 --- --- 2 0.20
Unrelated diversification. 0.10 --- --- --- ---
Legal, political and regulatory 0.05 4 0.20 1 0.05
factors of host country.
Inflation Rate. 0.08 2 0.16 3 0.24
Competition from P & G 0.15 4 0.60 3 0.45
Raw material cost increased. 0.10 3 0.30 4 0.40
Smuggled products and local 0.07 3 0.21 4 0.28
competition.
Strategic Recommendation
Following are necessary factors that must be present while choosing market
development strategy:
www.pakistanunilever.com
www.igisecurities.com.pk