This post is intended to shed some light on the effects
pornography is having on society and specifically on men
of this generation. There is no end to the vitriol spewed against the pornography industry ranging from them accused of objectifying the female body , by the feminist circles extending to their branding as agents of Satan by the conservative right. Feminists call it the male gaze which reduces the woman to an object forgetting that such has been the case for the whole of history, the difference being only the medium of expression which determined the extent of the intensity and savagery so to say depicted in that medium. There has never been a medium like the internet with its depth of reach and technological capacity and so porn is just another rider on this global technical revolution. In an episode of Boston Legal, the case revolves around a Professor of Art who is caught having sex with a prostitute and his eventual release, facilitated by the portrayal of the sex as art which is immune to prostitution charges. The professor happens to be a connoisseur of Victorian era sex gadgets. A comment from his defense attorney, Shirley is notable. She says the first use of any technological revolution is always in the realm of erotica and sex. This should be easy to explain given that sex is such a powerful force inside us and seizes the first chance to express itself in any form that appears. Porn as such is just an extension of this tendency in the realm of the internet. Dissidents of technology are quick to point out the disastrous effects of the internet in our lives but they neglect the sweeping benefits that the same technology has brought out. Technology like any other tool has its good and bad sides and porn only happens to be the darker aspect. But this increased intensity of sexual expression that now finds release in pornography is leading to changes that were simply not possible before and its a dangerous trend which can very much lead to deep generational disorders once it drops below the level of our collective consciousness and becomes embedded in our very psyches. Its this aspect that I want to talk about.
Its a given in our times that pleasure is our driving maxim.
We look to enjoy as much as possible, create happier lives as much as we can and dont think about death until we reach there, stumbling towards it or otherwise. In it, we are no different from the past since man has always sought happiness for himself and his loved ones. Except today, we dont have any restraining force to counter this pursuit of happiness. Its happiness for its own sake and not as a means to a higher end or the by product of a life lived with values and dignity. The Greeks considered happiness or eudamonia as a by product of a life of courage and it was in short supply in the mortal world. True happiness was a reward after death hence the saying, Never call a man happy until he is dead. This world was not the place to seek happiness or pleasure. Pleasure was not forbidden but there was a strong emphasis on self-control which acted as the strong counter force to an unrestrained chase for pleasure. Today that force has vanished and we can boldly claim to be the first people in history who are exclusively hunters for happiness. Of course life is harder today and we have to deal with lifes burdens but the goal remains to somehow handle these burdens and look out the window for the next pleasure to be grabbed and used up. A philosophy like this is not new as there were Epicureans in Ancient Greece and Charvakas in Ancient India who has pretty much the same hedonistic approach to life. But back then, philosophy was a national occupation and there were many philosophies contending for mass approval besides epicureanism like stoicism and platonism, or christian theology all of which, in some form or another expounded a philosophy of restraint whether because of the fear of God or for the benefit of the soul. There was no one philosophy that reigned supreme. Today pleasure and its relentless pursuit is a global axiom and what more fruitful an arena for the cultivation and enjoyment of pleasure than sex ?
Pornography though has its intellectual supporters like
Camille Paglia who rightly interprets it as a symbol of the savagery and chaos that resides deep in our subconscious, the violence and dirt that inhabit our depths and which remain hidden from the mainstream discourse only because society today has been sanitized beyond recognition with Political Correctness and easily offended feminists who wont take a deeper look at the origins of this and prefer to shout polemics of theoretical abstraction like male gaze and so on. Paglia terms pornography as the necessary expression of the Dionysian chaos in opposition to our cleanliness obsessed intellectual Appolonian mindset which wants life to be ruled by theories and cut-and-dried goodness without understanding the volcanoes growling beneath our skins. Which is true to a large extent. Life will always be an interplay of chaos and order and if we ignore the chaos, we run the risk of being blown away when its pressure erupts underneath. Feminists who point out moral degradation and terms like patriarchy dont understand that morality today is ultimately just an intellectual framework and its deeper spiritual underpinnings which gave it meaning are now lost. No one today is convinced by such moral arguments because there are equal arguments to not be moral today. For an immoral male gaze, we can always point out attention whoring and exhibitionist tendencies of the women. One can just say that porn is a victimless crime done in the privacy of ones home and we all have the right to privacy so where is the problem ? Anti-porn activists talk of porn encouraging rape but this causation is very difficult to prove as this is a deep psychological causation and very intractable to prove by empirical evidence. Thus no such argument will ever have an end.We see this not only in porn debates but also in abortion arguments where we cannot come to any conclusion because both sides have their points.In the meantime, porn just keeps expanding its tentacles and infecting millions of lives. There are now research studies how porn creates depression, erectile dysfunction, dopamine exhaustion and so on. Science can detect chemical changes and prescribe some remedies but its not a forceful argument against porn. The primitive drives that force us to see porn are not amenable to reason else feminists and intellectual arguments would have won us over long back. These are truly Dionysian Chaotic forces which take over our minds when we sit in front of our comfortable laptops at the end of a tired day spent doing whatever. The chaos is real but should this chaos be just let to play itself out or we need to take a hard look at what purpose is solved by the very existence of this chaos. This is what I intend to do here.
Christian Evangelists who term porn an agent of Satan
frequently call it an evil which wants to corrupt the soul of man. The theological aspect aside, its not unknown today that repeated porn use leads to many physical problems like depression and sexual dysfunction. In effect, the people watching the most amount of porn of people engaging in sex, are the least likely to have it themselves. Their minds are so attuned to watching millions of women naked that for a real flesh and blood woman to turn them on are limited. This should be the first reason to stop watching porn but as I said, such arguments hardly lead to change as the will of these drives are more powerful than the power of intellectual persuasion. Porn addicts are like those helpless sailors in a drowning ship who see their boats capsizing and try to hold on to it, all the time knowing that death is coming near and they are powerless to do anything about it. Except one little catch; porn addicts dont mind such a death if such an idea is at all in their heads. As porn eats away at their will power, they feel bad occasionally but the next wave of pleasure beckons and they rush headlong to satisfy that urge of ecstatic release of wet fluids. Its the seeking of pleasure that drives the universe of porn and here is its connection to all those bygone times and philosophies which advocated restraint and self-control. Their reasons were metaphysical and theological and probably the biggest tragedy of our age is the loss of these higher perspectives ,in the language of modern liberalism but to me they represent higher truths. A wise man once said that all problems are ultimately spiritual problems but I wont get into the metaphysical arguments against porn but highlight something more closer to home. And these arguments are embedded in the very discourse of pornographic portrayal.
Porn is not some random guy having sex with some
woman. Yes there are those kinds but its a universe with its own language and codes. These codes are visible to any keen observer who can take some break from his own enjoyment and look closely at the stereotypes and mannerisms of the actors in pornography. Just one axiom remains unchallenged, that porn is a means to experience pleasure. Some might say, its also a theatre of power but we will come to this complex interplay a bit later. Let us try to imagine one such porn viewer and his motives. He wants to watch porn because he loves that release that comes at the end of his short journey, one which leaves him satiated and exhausted, though pleased. Thats the goal which he can achieve by any category of porn, be it a inter-racial porn, cuckold, femdom, submissive or whatever. Its this 2 second release that drives him. He wants to quickly get that eruption and drown in the post-coital bliss of nothingness which typically makes him sleep out of a weakness which he interprets as peace. We here have to note that even today, most porn viewers are male and to a large extent, the male gaze is true. Porn is made for men, viewed by men, discussed by men much more than women. We can find some feminists objecting to this and claim the equal right to watch porn but statistically thats a lesser percentage though increasing steadily. I will focus on the effects of porn on men and then on women in the end.
Real life sex for such a porn viewer is pretty much an
extension of his virtual life. He is quick to do it if he at all can get it up and quick to sleep. He might loiter around in the womans body for some time but action is limited in our dudes real theatre of sex. Now we come to an aspect of sex which has become controversial for reasons I shall explore later. Its the question of power in sex. As Oscar Wilde said, Everything is about sex, and sex is about power. The question is , whose power ? Oscar Wilde said it in the context of a man and Kevin Spacey reiterated that in House of Cards as Frank Underwood was fucking a journalist in return for his giving her some inside information on the White House. He too is a powerful man in the drama and the portrayal is consistent with that character. He is as ruthless in sex as in life. The woman is portrayed as enjoying this encounter with relish and desire. He demands sex and possesses his willing victim with a combination of violent urge and cold control. Sex will always be about the possessor and the possessed. The only difference is how man and woman divide themselves in the occupation of these two roles. Who wants to possess and who wants to be possessed ? Who wants power and who wants pleasure ? More importantly, how does power and pleasure related to possessor and possessed. These are timeless questions and worthy of deep contemplation but we have these answers in the world of pornography itself. But before that, spare a moment for our dude now sleeping after his satiated release. Think for a moment about the woman he had sex with. What is going on in her mind ? Sex was barely starting when he exclaimed his achievement of that much desire climax and retreated like a coy puppy inside his blanket. Unless its her first experience, in which case she has no understanding other than a vague sadness, any experienced woman is likely to never have sex again or have anything to do with such a man. But whats the real problem ? Why is she unhappy really ? Is time such an important factor in love and its physical expression ? Why wont love for this man over rule any such feelings of disapproval on the part of the woman ? The reason is pleasure is something women want too. And the classical taunt to such a man is that he is selfish, that he cares about his own pleasure and has no idea how to pleasure his woman. But of course, every porn addict is selfish, else why would he even watch porn ? But usually this habit is hidden from their women who would probably feel undesired or unloved or if she is a feminist, would brand him the dreaded male gaze fanatic. Porn thus comes down to selfishness and in real life, the very structure of sex makes it an irredeemable sin for a man to be selfish in bed. We must keep in mind here, the moment in history where such a thing as selfish in bed can even arise. Even a hundred years back, when pleasure was not such an eagerly sought after object, such a man would not be called anything. His partner would just take it as it came, the feeling of being left stranded in bed would not occur to the woman, children would appear and life would go on as usual. Sex was not something to discuss, rather to just do and shut up. Our dude though is born in different times.
In sex between man and woman, pleasure and power are
divided between man and woman. Greek Myth relates the story of Zeus coming out of his wife Heras bedroom and being confronted by a friend who asks him, who had more pleasure ? Zeus shrugs his shoulders as if surprised at the question itself and exclaims, Of course Hera. He even gives a ratio of this division, being 1:9, nine being the proportion of pleasure enjoyed by Hera, his share being a paltry one. We have come a long way since those times but nothing has changed in the constitution of the human body. The woman now is just like the woman then and her body has much more capacity of pleasure than the men. A hint of this is present in the chthonic moans of women and the sweaty grunts of men in the vanilla variety of heterosexual porn, which is my main area of emphasis here. For men, sex is thus a sacrifice. He has to sacrifice his own pleasure if his woman has to have the volcanic outbursts of orgasms she very much looks forward to. If not, he better just stay locked up in his room with porn. But one might ask, is this sacrifice just for her pleasure ? Well, here we come to the other side of the equation, Power. One compliment men look forward to is that he is good in bed. Among other things it means he is not selfish and can last longer and can do this very sacrifice which makes him feel good since he very much wants that power to be able to please women. Power is inherent to this feeling of victory since he is the one who is able to give that pleasure. He can control that thing and choose not to give that. This sacrifice of man for the pleasure of woman gives him that power which he relishes. Porn is very explicit in this portrayal and one might call them stereotypes, but the word stereotype exists because it is true for most. Exceptions here prove the rule. The very enjoyment of power entails one sacrifice his desire for pleasure. This deep truth does not apply only to sex but to all areas of life. Its not for nothing that ancient cultures prohibited pleasure since for them, the goal was a nether world after death which could only be happy if one has let go of earthly desires, desires whose goal is to achieve pleasure, be it physical, emotional or mental. This is the real origin of this banishment of pleasure seeking which later degenerated into moralistic admonitions and an external ban on pleasure which defeats its purpose since this check should be internal and not imposed from outside. Christians externalized this ancient greek idea of self-control which led to enormous tragedies of extreme repression and church paedophilia, the full extent of which is coming out only now as seen in Ireland and Boston revelations. But to go back to our topic, our dude thus suffers in real life, goes back to his room and sees even more porn and gets inside a vicious circle of pleasure and self-destruction.
Porn encourages a form of voyeurship where you watch
others having sex and this detached viewing gives you a turn on which you use to achieve orgasms. Its selfish for sure but more importantly its teaching you a way to achieve pleasure cut off from the real life experience of sex where you are the actor and not necessarily the viewer. Intimate sex requires you are mindful of your womans needs and not obsessed to achieve orgasm. If orgasm is your real objective, why have a woman at all ? Porn is far better that way. But a mind trained in porn cant switch perspectives depending on the situation since porn begins with selfishness and the addict is just looking to replicate his pleasure in the real world. The other dangerous off-shoot of this tendency to get turned on by watching others is the now famous tendency of the cuckold male who watches his wife having sex with other men and actively or passively encourages it. I shall come to the active passive aspect below. Ordinary understanding might explain this that he is just a submissive man who cant satisfy his wife and so is helpless if his wife seeks out other men. Or that he desires his wife only when other men desire her, a perverse form of jealousy which has been used by men and women implicitly for ever to spice up things now and then. But cuckold is not just a matter of jealousy driven desire or plain submissiveness. Its active encouragement and willing submission to his wifes demands for men who can satisfy her better. Cuckold porn has now reached epic levels and is the second most viewed category among all. Playboy and Salon have written articles trying to analyze the sudden rise of this particular form of pornography. They give detailed psychological theories but they miss the origin of this drive. At the end of the day, the cuckold is a normal man seeking his own pleasure. What he has been seeing for years on screen, ejaculating a million times to random men and women having sex, he now wants in real. Yes surely one might say that real life is different and that its his own wife involved, one who surely evokes passions of ownership and one whose loss will cause enormous pain, not to mention the humiliation involved in such an act carried out in real life. But the question is, is such a humiliation really so painful ? Humiliation is a psychological state of mind, but submission is a much more truer word to describe such a state. In the earlier analysis of power and pleasure, I skipped the question of the possessor and possessed deliberately so as to place it here. The one who owns and possesses necessarily has control. The one who is possessed and has willingly surrendered has pleasure as its reward. Surrender and pleasure go hand in hand when it comes to sex. Since the one to surrender is going to get pleasure out of it, these underlying drives are structured by nature itself and not done so consciously as we might think.
For tens of thousands of years, we have lived as man and
woman and nature has guided us in sex, designing power and pleasure in such a way that the act is carried out with the most efficient results. These issues have never been very important until now when we see man and woman fighting for individual power in every day life outside the bed and its no surprise that the bed also becomes just another playfield of such urges. There is pleasure in surrender when it comes to sex. If there was no such pleasure, would women have such moans as they do when they climax ? Would any woman just surrender, although unconsciously , if nature had not arranged such a reward from doing so ? In sex, women have always enjoyed being possessed and the perverse thrill of being owned has being the subject of great literature too, D H Lawrence being the great master at understanding this game. Pleasure is a very complex phenomenon but submission is always a companion to it. Of course one can say, seeking power is a pleasure in itself but this power in sex is not a pleasure at the same level as the sexual physical pleasure achieved in climax. This power is much more psychological than physical. When a man seeks physical pleasure, its through his own climax and such a climax has no hint of power in it at all. The way in which porn shows this division is in the portrayal of cuckold porn where a man is sometimes humiliated by his wife as she is having sex with a hunk who fucks her like an animal. The man is outwardly all helpless and even tries to object but ultimately is shown rubbing his penis for pleasure. Just like women get a big thrill from submitting themselves to a powerful man, similarly men too get a sexual thrill and pleasure from submission to a woman. The guy screwing his woman is really a third party and of no importance to the cuckold. His real pleasure is in submitting to his woman, his thrill is in obeying the orders of his mistress, her goddess as its shown in many such porn. On the outside, it seems the man is being humiliated and forced to serve his mistress but the inner pleasure of the man as he submits is rarely understood. For a porn viewer, watching such a video allows him to identify with the man and enjoy the vicarious pleasure of submission which makes him climax quickly. The thrill of submission which was, in times past restricted only to women has now reached the hearts of men who have drowned themselves today in the pursuit of this shortcut to pleasure. Watching a hunk having sex with a woman can give pleasure to a man too but the nature of this pleasure has more power in it than the much more psychologically forceful way of enjoying pleasure by submission to a woman. This explains the rise of this specific brand of porn called cuckold porn which is now teaching a whole generation of men to serve women simply because they are women. This is all underneath the narrative of course since admitting such pleasures is considered perverse so most men would not admit such a thing. But the statistics are too staggering to be ignored now. In the US, there are dedicated dominatrix women who service men by such means as humiliation and Craiglist has millions of men advertising for willing men to have sex with their wives. When such a powerful willingness resides in so many men, surely a large part of them wants it. Else cuckold porn wont exist in the dominating way it does today. I wont go into the details of this category as there is no limit to such excesses . It was my intention to explain the psychological drives of submission and power as expressed through the pornographic industry. Porn is a big part of our lives not just through the internet but mainstream media is teaching a lot of such attitudes through TV, ads and novels.
The eternal principles of man and woman are not going to
change and the great wisdom of the ancient cultures was that they were based on such eternal orders of life. The reason there was less of a prohibition on women, the reason that all responsibility for strength, dignity, honour, courage, renunciation, selflessness fell on men and even today really fall on men is that nature intended men to be guardians of society, harbingers of new dawns for their people. Its not sexist to admit the natures of men and women. The combination of the two determines creation itself but its worthwhile to ask, what was the need of two sexes ? What characterizes the division between man and woman ? Because going by the current discourse, it would seem that since women are doing anything men can, there is just one sex, that of men. But femininity in its essence is not just about surrender. That is just a trick of nature to ensure sex between man and woman. But its a trick that is very very important to ensure natures plan. And this game of sexual possession and sexual surrender is as much visible in porn as anywhere else. Cuckold porn typically has a man serving a woman, doing her chores, washing her private parts but never having sex with her. He has given up all power willingly in life for the reward of his selfish pleasure of release. We are teaching men to prioritize selfish pleasure above all else. This is counter to the entire period of known history since man began his existence. Mans desire for achievement and power led to the rise of entire civilizations and histories. Its the one thing man can do, whether the power be temporal or eternal, be it power to achieve your goals or power to help, save and protect your people. And the very foundations of this search for power is the ability to deny yourself something you want. Its the very denial of pleasure that leads man to achieve that self-sufficient completeness only after which he can be of any help to anyone, be it woman or his society. Denial of ones personal desires of pleasure has been the basis of civilization and the repudiation of such a profound ideal portends dangerous signs for society. Of course, porn is not the only force operating today but it has become a major player in pop culture, given its billions of dollars in profits and tremendous cultural power, although not so widely known. The greek philosophers used to say that desires are the leakages in a mans fort. Every desire when denied gives man the power to master himself and master his destiny. There is no point blaming women for destroying manhood as the roots of this destruction lie inside modern man himself. His desires has led him to where he is and until and unless he learns to deny himself his pleasures, until he is able to control the nature playing havoc inside him through his desires, he will destroy his significance more and more. There is a lot of truth in the modern saying of feminists that women today needs not a man. Men today can give women nothing which they really need except maybe his sperm, which can also be got from any random man from a sperm bank or a late night stand. What men have always brought to women was character, the basis of which was also the denial of self-seeking desires. That truth remains true even today. Earning a million dollars means nothing to the woman today unless she is a gold-digger until you bring in self- control and command inside you. Men are failing everywhere for the lack of fathers. Single mothers are rising in every country and no matter how much a mother cares for her child, she cannot be a father, something she show and something we have always known. Fathers are not required to take care so much as to show the way ahead. The way ahead in ancient cultures always started with struggle. Life was a struggle and is a struggle but the only difference today is that we dont question the purpose of this struggle. Also the greatest struggle in life was inside of man for the ancients. The only worthwhile life was one in which you won over yourself. This meant there are things inside you which are your enemies and which have to be defeated. This internal division in man was the basis of that much abused maxim, Know Thyself. Man is not a harmonious creature. Not all aspects inside him want his good. There is good and there is bad. They have to known and removed. The greatest enemy of man inside him was always his desires and cravings. They had to be known and controlled if not removed. Today the world of advertisement has reversed this and proclaims satisfaction of desires as the primary goal. Is there any surprise when we see the world and its men killing each other for personal selfishness. Porn is not responsible for all this I know but it cant be ignored that sex, which was always kept under the carpet has been unleashed in such a way today that it threatens to destroy the very concept of manhood itself. Rome fell when its kings became lustful and lecherous, when its generals started marrying prostitutes and becoming beholden to them. Today the world is again at the stage when sex has become the biggest battlefield in the personal lives of men and women. If only for the solution of that, men should stop porn and remove this desire for sexual pleasure from inside their hearts and minds. Once the sex is good, I am sure many problems between men and women will just cease.