Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
This includes lenses for the Contax RF, Contax SLR, Nikon RF, Carl Zeiss and Carl Zeiss
Jena lenses and lenses by other makers for other cameras. If your lens is not listed on this page and you want to know
if it can be overhauled here and the cost please use this email link to contact me:
Lens Overhaul Question Email
Lens Overhaul Prices and Turaround Time:
If you have a lens that needs an overhaul or to be repaired and you want to know the price and turn around time please use this
email link to send me an email about it and I will reply promptly. Please send me all the information you have about the lens and
describe the problem that causes you to believe the lens needs an overhaul or repair. In the case of most overhauls a firm price
can be provided.
Lens Overhaul or Repair Cost Question Email
The Reason an Old Lens Needs a Complete Overhaul:
All lenses contain grease to lubricate the focusing and/or aperture control mechanisms. Grease is made of oil and other
ingredients that cause the oil to form a solid so that it will stay where it is applied. Over time the grease begins to degrade and it
will release this oil. The oil moves into the lens and coats the glass internal lens elements. Lenses must be absolutely clean in
order to do the job each lens element in a lens is designed to do. A lens full of oil coated elements will not focus precisely nor
will it render colors as it was designed to do. This oil is also food for mold. The mold eats the oil and exudes acid as a by
product. Depending upon the mold it can exude acid strong enough to etch coatings and glass. This is why it is necessary for a
lens to be completely overhauled with each and every piece of it thoroughly cleaned and disinfected. It does no good to
superficially service a lens by pouring oil into it or by merely cleaning the lens elements. Fungus spores can reside deep inside
a lens and continue to grow in one that has not been completely disinfected. All lenses overhauled here are completely cleaned.
Any lens over 20 years old should be considered to be old enough to need an overhaul. The fact that oil may not be visible on
the aperture blades may merely mean the grease in the lens released all of its oil a long time ago. How fast the grease in a lens
will degrade depends upon its storage and use conditions.
The Reality of Manufactured Lenses. Lens Testing and an Overhaul:
Over the years I've had the opportunity to examine thousands of lenses for every kind of camera and all of this experience
suddenly distilled itself into two thoughts about lenses that is the most important thing for anyone to know when selecting one to
buy. This is simply the one single most important thing about a lens is the optical glass used to make it. Everything else is just
window dressing. A lens is just like any other manufactured product. The better and the more expensive the raw materials used
to make it the more effort and craftsmanship will be expended on the fine details of manufacture. No one can imagine a lens
maker putting $1000.00 worth of labor into a lens made with the cheapest grade of optical glass. But, if you look at all the
advertising ever printed about every lens ever made you read nothing about the optical glass used in the lens. There is
absolutely nothing. A couple of years ago I read an interview with the owner of a company in Japan that manufactures lenses
with a very high name engraved on them. In this interview he said that his company only used the best optical glass for
prototypes and then used lesser quality glass for production lenses because "the customers don't notice it". The second thought
is that since nothing is written about optical glass and the lenses the best grade of glass is used in the only way to go is to test.
The problem is this takes custom made machines that only lens manufacturers can afford to make. Fortunately one of these
came up for sale on Ebay and I bought it. Here's a picture of the lens microscope made by the Canon camera co.:
This lens microscope is shown with a postwar T coated 50mm f1.5 Sonnar lens mounted on it. This microscope allows me to
view the sharpness of lenses, at high magnification, when they are sighted at a high resolution target in this three foot long
super high precision optical target collimator that was made to match with this lens microscope:
This lens evaluation equipment was manufactured by the Canon camera co and is labeled for "Factory Use Only". I believe it
was used to evaluate prototype lenses designed for the Canon line of Rangefinder cameras and was custom made by them for
this purpose. This equipment has allowed me to come to one conclusion and this is that Zeiss used only the highest possible
quality optical glass in the lenses they made for their entire range of cameras including the Super Ikonta, Contax and Contarex.
They held nothing back and engaged in a process of continuous improvement. Everything else I've seen is just not quite as
good. You can spend $2000.00 for a strangely named lens or other oddity but the fact is when it comes to optical performance
there are only two things to look for on a lens. This is "Carl Zeiss" and "Made in Germany". These days there is a superstition
against postwar Carl Zeiss Jena lenses. These lenses are optically just as good as West German made Carl Zeiss branded
lenses except that they are made of aluminum whereas the West German made lenses are made of chrome plated brass.
If you would like to read everything Zeiss ever divulged about the making of lenses, and it is quite a lot of very valuable
information, you can use this link to download the Zeiss booklet, "Photographic Lenses and How They Are Made" published in
1928:
How Lenses are Made
If you would like to know just about everything that can be known about modern optical glass please use this link to access the
article "Optical Glass" published recently by the Edmund Optical Company. It is very comprehensive:
Edmund Optical Article "Optical Glass"
If you would like to know just about everything that can be known about modern optical coatings please use this link to access
the article "Anit Reflection Coatings" published recently by the Edmund Optical Company. It is very comprehensive:
Edmund Article "Anti Reflection (AR) Coatings"
This Zeiss Article posted on the Carl Zeiss Web Site is a 33 page PDF document explaning everything you ever wanted to know
about photographic lenses and what makes a good or bad lens. This article is about as definitive and complete as can be and is
weill worth reading:
Zeiss Article "Reading MTF Curves"
The one remaining big secret about old lenses is the optical glass used in them is vastly superior to the optical glass available
today. The reason for this is modern safety and environmental regulations have resulted in the removal of both lead and arsenic
from modern optical glass. The removal of these ingredients has had a very strong effect upon the quality of optical glass
available making lenses made with optical glass that contains arsenic and lead to be very superior. Right now, given the
resolution limits on digital cameras this lower quality optical glass does not produce digital results that are visible. But, in time,
and with decreases in pixel size it will become evident.
Also, there are various grades of optical glass. Optical glass can cost the same as gold and so only the best lenses get the best
optical glass used in them. There is a famous maker of lenses today who admitted in an interview some years ago that they
used the best optical glass only in their prototype lenses and used less good glass in their production lenses. This is not true for
classic Zeiss lenses. Zeiss has always used the best possible optical glass in all of its lenses that are made in Germany.
Optical glass making is completely ruled by trade secrets. Little is known about it by persons not directly involved in its
manufacture who are bound by iron-clad secrecy contracts.. But it has been disclosed that small amounts of various metals,
some toxic, improve optical glass. The problem is modern safety regulations prohibit the use of some of these metals in optical
glass manufacture because the metals are toxic. This has resulted in a reduction of the overall quality of optical glass used in
the making of lenses. This quality decline has been obscured in recent times by the fact most modern made lenses are being
used on digital cameras and so it cannot be seen.....yet. You can be sure if you buy a German made Zeiss lens made prior to
the formation of the European Union you are getting the best possible optical glass that can be made.
I've seen some Zeiss lenses that have taught me a big lesson about lens performance. The most recent was a Contarex 18mm
Distagon. This is a very complex lens made up of nine groups. A customer sent me his 18mm Distagon lens for an overhaul
and at first examination it looked bad. It could plainly be seen that the inner lens elements had lots and lots of grinding defects.
When the lens was disassembled there was even one element covered with very severe grinding defects in a square cross
hatch pattern that were so deep they would catch a finger nail. But when all the elements had been cleaned and the lens
reassembled and it was collimated it was without a doubt the sharpest performing lens I've ever seen. The owner himself wrote
me about a year later to say that the performance of the lens astounded him and it was his sharpest Contarex lens by far.
The lesson of all this is that you cannot possibly judge the performance of a lens by its cosmetic appearance. There is a famous
instance where an astronomer who purchased a very large Zeiss telescope made a complaint to Zeiss about the bubbles in the
lens glass. The reply he received was "Lenses are for looking through and not for looking at".
The ugliest lenses can, and often do, provide the highest possible level of photographic performance. The conclusion I've been
led to by years of peering through Zeiss lenses is that while a cosmetically perfect lens will do the best on the marketplace, the
more the bubbles the better the pictures the lens will produce. If you're looking for pure Mokeh and you have to bet on a lens,
bet on the Zeiss lens with the most original factory defects.
I get many comments from people so see things inside their lenses such as
wipe marks, spots, bubbles in the glass, scratches, and just about anything
else the eye can see. The simple fact of the matter is that lens making is a
thing shrouded in manufacturing secrecy, trade secrets, secret formulas and
a lack of factual information. No lens manufacturer has ever stated that the
lenses they make will be completely free of any kind of observable thing.
Manufacturer's typically provide only lens performance charts and this is all
there is. It is normal for a typical lens, and in particular an older lens, or a high
tech. lens made of superior optical glass, to have some bubbles in the glass,
discontinuities in coatings, spots in coatings and other flaws such as grinding
marks of various kinds. Optical glass is very expensive to make and in the
case of very high tech. lenses from premium manufacturers such as Leitz and
Zeiss, very rare and expensive pieces of optical glass containing obvious
visible defects were often used to make lenses because it was impossible to
get glass that didn't have both defects and highly desirable optical properties
at that time.
Many people like to observe their lenses by shining a bright light through it
from the rear and then examine it with a magnifying glass or a microscope.
There is no authoritative lens testing book I've ever seen that has described this test. The reason for this is that lenses are sold
based on performance and not on the individual cosmetic beauty of the elements that are assembled together to make the lens.
Lens elements can have significant coating and/or grinding marks on them and when assembled in a lens produce a lens that
has tremendously great performance. Paradoxically, cosmetically perfect lens elements can be assembled into the same lens
and produce a worthless piece of junk. Premium lens makers assemble their lenses using individual elements that produce the
best results from the lens as an assembly and this means that sometimes individual elements may not have as much cosmetic
beauty as others, but their optical performance is highly superior to others.
A dirty lens, when examined from behind with a bright light and examined from the front with a magnifying glass will have a
superior internal cosmetic beauty to one that has been very carefully cleaned. It is for this reason that there is absolutely no
guarantee of any kind with respect to any before/after defect or object anyone may see when a lens is examined by this
method, sent here for an overhaul, and then reexamined using the same method. My advice to you, if you are married to his
method of examining lenses, is to please take your lenses to someone who you are sure will take your money and will do
nothing other than to wipe off the outside of the lens and then return it to you. My policy is to not respond directly to any
comment, question or observation about a lens examined by this method other than to direct the person to this
paragraph.
When you send a lens here for an overhaul it will be completely disassembled. Each and every part and lens element will be
cleaned multiple times in several solvents. Each lens element will be examined carefully and will only be reinstalled unless it is
totally clean. Then the lens will be lubricated, assembled, adjusted and collimated. There are no short cuts or abbreviations.
The purpose of an overhaul is, to the maximum possible extent, to return your lens to factory original condition or better.
The lens overhaul process has been expanded to include the use of Swiss made Fixodrop lubricant fixative inside lenses. This
is a treatment that is brushed onto clean and oil free metal surfaces. It blocks the movement of oil or grease across any surface
treated with it. It does not expire, degrade, migrate or wear out. It's a permanent treatment.. Fixodrop is applied where
necessary to keep aperture lubrication in its place so that it does not migrate over time into other parts of the lens such as lens
element surfaces and aperture blades. Fixodrop is tremendously expensive, but it is used liberally and is applied lavishly inside
your lens so that your lens will retain the superior optical performance that comes from extreme cleanliness of the lens surfaces,
the aperture blades move freely, and the lens moving parts stay properly lubricated for a great many years.
This is a picture taken in the Zeiss Jena lens factory in 1946. It shows a technician using the machine that produces the knurled
ring around the upper lip of the Contax 50mm Sonnar lens.
\
The caption on the back of this picture reads:
ACME PHOTO SERVICE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 5/10/1946. "This worker is assembling Zeiss lenses prized by
shutterbugs the world over with 10,000 workers on the job, the Zeiss Plant is operating at all most full scale prewar levels.
Some of the cameras turned out here will be bought by the U.S. Army for PX distribution." It should be noted that the Russians
had confiscated 93% of the Zeiss machinery in Germany as war reparations and so the statement the Zeiss Plant is operating
at pre war levels of production had to be overly optimistic. Obviously the fact the picture shows that lenses for the Contax
camera were being produced demonstrates that Zeiss was producing the Contax, today called the "Jena Contax" at this time.
Filter Ring Dents and Dings:
There's nothing quite as tragic as a wonderful lens whose appearance has been ruined through the use of a lens vise or pliers
to "repair" a filter ring ding. Here special tools are used to gently bend the bent metal back into shape so that in most cases the
repair can be done without any sign that there had been a ding to begin with. Here are before and after pictures of a worst case
lens:
Even if your lens is not a 50mm it is possible to make a special tool to suit it so that the best possible repairs can be
accomplished. If a special tool is needed for your lens you are not charged for it.
Epoxy and Balsam Cemented Lens Separation Repair:
It is possible to permanently and safety correct the most common Zeiss lens problem and this is the separation of epoxy
cemented lenses. The following two pictures show before and after views of the
same center triplet element from a Carl Zeiss Sonnar 50 mm f1.5 Lens with
cement separation.
The process does not affect the coatings, lens centering, element alignment or
any other optical attribute of the lens other than the separation. The procedure is
permanent and
does not use oil of
any kind. The lens
is actually
separated into its
component
elements and then
re cemented using
a modern lens cement. The Separation process does not affect the original coatings or any other lens property. Unlike other
separation processes that use great heat, remove the coatings, and require re polishing and re coating at great cost; the
separation process used here has absolutely no effect on the lens or its coatings. Only the original lens cement is removed. You
can clearly see the lens is much clearer and color free than it was before it was re-cemented. All lens cements from the past
deteriorate and separation is only the final stage of deterioration. The cement will discolor and become opaque and will degrade
the lens performance very much.
Here are three pictures showing an 85mm f2.0 Sonnar lens rear element with severe internal hazing and clouding caused by
deterioration of the original epoxy lens cement. The first picture is of the lens
element in its original condition. The arrows show the edge clouding and browning.
This picture shows the lens removed from its mount and separated into its three
component elements:
This picture is of the lens element, back in its
mount, re cemented and ready for use:
The lens cement used is the latest high technology very slow curing military
specification type. It has a higher index of refraction than previous generation
cements, and this provides greater lens coupling with less internal dispersion
resulting in greater lens clarity and brilliance providing greater color correction,
sharpness and contrast. This is the lowest stress lens cement there is and this low stress further reduces the internal lens
dispersion and enhances coupling.. it is is much clearer and will not discolor under high temperature. It is also highly shock
resistant and does not over harden as the old epoxy cements do. it is just the best that there is available anywhere.
Here is a picture through a Carl Zeiss 50mm f1.5 Sonnar that has had both of its cemented elements (middle and rear)
separated and re cemented with the new high tech. lens cement::
Here is a
picture of
bubbles
contained in
the optical
glass of a
Contax 50mm
f2.0 Coated
postwar
Sonnar: