Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
com
In 1977, the movie Dangal was released (not to be confused with Aamir
Khans movie of the same name released in 2016). It was a Bhojpuri film
in fact, the first Bhojpuri colour film starring Hindi movie villain
Sujit Kumar of Aradhana fame and Prema Narayan, a seventies starlet
who had never graduated to the big league in Hindi cinema. This kicked
off a second wave of Bhojpuri cinema.
About two decades previously, the Hindi movie character actor Nazir
Hussain had sought the blessings of the then-President, Rajendra Prasad
and kicked off shooting for the first Bhojpuri film Ganga Maiya Tohe
Piyari Chadhaibo. It took nearly five years for the movie to hit the screen
and was released in 1962. The movie was a smashing success and a rash
of films followed, many of dubious quality. By the decades end, Bhojpuri
cinema had petered out.
By the late eighties, the industry ran aground again. Since the turn of the
millennium however, Bhojpuri cinema has made a comeback and indeed
thrived. Such has been its appeal that at least two of its stars have been
inducted into politics solely on the basis of the wide acceptance of their
persona among the Bhojpuri-speaking public Manoj Tiwari and Ravi
Kishan.
The many languages that are actually spoken in these States have been
demoted to dialect status, (in the national interest, of course), and
Hindi as it is spoken in Delhi and perhaps, a corner of Uttar Pradesh
promoted as their language.
In popular telling, these States constitute the Hindi heartland and they
are spoken of by most people outside these areas as a huge parcel of
territory that is more or less similar, ignoring the many local histories,
traditions and indeed linguistic differences that ought to be considered
when discussing these areas.
Take the case of Bihar. Hindi and Urdu are its declared State languages.
A whole host of other languages spoken in Bihar Angika, Bajjika,
Magahi, Maithili and Bhojpuri (all related Indo-Aryan tongues) do not
figure in the argument at all as they were subsumed under Hindi in the
1961 Census.
Similar is the case of Uttar Pradesh. In central Uttar Pradesh (UP), the
spoken tongue is Awadhi. In Bundelkhand (Jhansi, Lalitpur and nearby
areas), the tongue is Bundeli. Indeed, Bundeli is spoken in parts of
neighbouring Madhya Pradesh as well.
Even as the southern part of the country alongwith Punjab and Bengal
has kept an eagle eye for the slightest whiff of Hindi imposition, it is
perhaps time for north India to think in terms of resisting Hindi
imposition too. Northern India ought to own up its local languages and
resist their being subsumed under the arbitrary label of Hindi.
A tongue based on false premises cannot truly fulfil the aspirations of the
people. India does not need a language. Our many languages have fed
into a colourful identity of our own that have effectively challenged
western notions of nationalism. Our many local identities can co-exist
with our Indian identity.
Eventually, our Indian identity can co-exist with a South Asian identity
that recognises the many commonalities across the region. Perhaps, in
time, we will realise the true meaning of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam.