Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Institution
YR 6 2017 H2 Geography
Term 2 CT Answers
Theme 3.2: Sustainable Urban Development
1 (a) Explain why urban traffic congestion occurs in countries with lower levels of
development. [12]
3 main causes:
Excess traffic:
o *Too many people due to high natural increase and rapid rural to urban migration,
placing a large strain on transportation (important factor).
o Too many cars, lack of control of road use (road pricing), lack of control of car
ownership. E.g. Beijings lottery system limits car growth but indirectly results in
pent-up demand. Out of province vehicles also frequently travel into the city, with
little control.
o Informal transport, travelling at varying speeds, slowing down overall speed,
leading to congestion. E.g. Bangkoks Tuk Tuks weave in and out of traffic
recklessly, causing cars to slow down or brake suddenly.
Poor rules and regulations:
o Lack of adherence to the rules. May be due to a lack of effective enforcement.
o Corruption and bribery allows road users to ignore the rules and pay a bribe when
caught flouting traffic rules. E.g. Bribes are often given to traffic police in Malaysia.
o Cultural importance of certain VVIP vehicles in India frequently causes congestion.
E.g. In May 2017, India banned red beacon lights on top of VIP cars to ease misuse
of the siren.
Insufficient capacity:
o Lack of funding for expansion of current infrastructure. Limited roadway
expansion, even when expanded, toll charges dissuade road users.
o Lack of public transport, mass transit has a higher capacity, which can help to ease
congestion. Subway systems are very costly. E.g. The Government of Vietnam
spent US$133.86 million on Line 2A of the Hanoi Metro project, with Chinese
Official Development Assistance (ODA) at US$419 million. According to the
Minister of Transport, Vietnam had to buy 13 Chinese trains, and the Chinese
contractors in this project were poorly competent but could not be replaced due
to the ODA agreement.
o Lack of proper planning, e.g. Bangkoks lassiez faire attitude towards urban
planning, lacking a coherent plan, piecemeal strategies.
Evaluation: One main criticism of this index is that well-being is very subjective and highly
personal. There may be also some cultural biasedness in understanding well-being.
Interestingly, in the 2012 ranking, 9 out of the top 10 countries were from the Caribbean
region.
Idea 2: Challenge of measuring and keeping track.
Global City Indicators by the World Bank and the University of Toronto, measures 3 main
areas: City services; Quality of Life; Sustainability and resilience.
Decentralised i.e. cities themselves fill in the gap. Through the collection and analysis of
city data in a comparative format, elected officials and the public will be able to monitor
the performance of their cities over time based on a core set of indicators.
Evaluation: decentralisation allows cities to monitor and track their own performance,
rather than relying on external organisations to formulate a measurement every year.
Idea 3: Need for neutrality of sustainable urban development indicators.
Due to the different stakeholders and interest groups in the framework of sustainable
urban development, the neutrality of these indicators needs to be questioned.
Idea 5: Need for flexibility when measuring sustainable urban development.
The flexibility of the indicator may be important at times, due to the lack of available data.
The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) supports the development of consistent and quality
systems for sustainability reporting globally. The GRI produce guidelines on the contents,
quality and scope for sustainability reporting for organisations working across various
sectors.
Rather than a one-sized fit all indicator, the GRI is flexible because it allows on the firms
or cities to report on aspects which concerns them.
Evaluation: Though seemingly ideal, the GRI may at times result in a biased indicator of
sustainable urban development, allowing its users to mask certain less sustainable
practices, while over-emphasising other insignificant aspects.
3 Resource 6 shows an urban slum along a railway track in India. Resource 7 shows a
model of a self-help housing scheme in India. Resource 8 shows victims of crime in
urban slums across India. Resource 9 shows traffic congestion in Mumbai, India.
(a) Describe the hazards of living in an urban slum shown in Resource 6. [4]
Must be observable
Overcrowded, houses are packed side by side; increased spread of
diseases due to close spatial proximity.
Built using make-shift materials, corrugated iron sheets, wooden
planks, some use brick; increased risk of collapse due to poor building
standards.
Dangerous due to proximity to railway tracks; increased risk of injury
and death by moving trains.
Illegally tapped electricity; increased fire hazard due to poor wiring.
*Lies on a marginal land, zone of disamenity; lack of any government
investment (under-bounding).
Not valid:
Lack of sanitation
Crime
Risk of eviction must be linked to lack of infrastructure seen from
illegal tapping of electricity
(b) With reference to Resource 6, explain why the poor choose to move to
urban slums. [4]
Better infrastructure available in urban slums as compared to rural
areas