Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Journal of
Natural
Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines 2012, 10(4): 02550259 Medicines
[ABSTRACT] AIM: To evaluate the antioxidant and -amylase inhibition potential of phenolic compounds in the extracts of Indian
honey. METHODS: Phenolic compounds were extracted from Indian honey through column chromatography. The antioxidant poten-
tial of extracted phenolic compounds was measured by two different biochemical assays: ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)
assay and scavenging activity on 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicals. Moreover, -amylase inhibition assay of phenolic
compounds of honey was also evaluated. RESULTS: The scavenging inhibition rate varied from 86.8% to 78.6% from the highest (6
mgmL1) to the lowest (1.5 mgmL1) concentration, whereas, reducing power assay varied from 0.89 Abs to 0.19 Abs from the highest
to the lowest concentration. Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was used as reference compound for antioxidant assays. -amylase inhi-
bition assay is reported from the phenolic honey extracts for the first time. The inhibition rate for -amylase varied from 88.8% to
30.5% from the highest (20 gmL1) to the lowest concentration (4 gmL1). CONCLUSION: Honey phenolic extract possessed
antioxidant and -amylase inhibition activity, thus increasing its potential therapeutic property.
[KEY WORDS] Honey; Phenolic compounds; Antioxidant activity; DPPH and FRAP; -Amylase inhibition activity
[CLC Number] R965 [Document code] A [Article ID] 1672-3651(2012)04-0255-05
first time, revealed the alpha amylase inhibitory potential of extracts were combined, and the diethyl ether was removed
phenolic extracts of honey and this study could be helpful to by flushing with nitrogen. The dried residue was then
develop medicinal preparation against diabetes and related re-dissolved with methanol for antioxidant activities and
symptoms. The main approach for treating diabetes is to de- -amylase inhibition test.
crease the post-prandial hyperglycemia. This is done by re- 2.4 Antioxidant activities
tarding the glucose absorption through the inhibition of car- 2.4.1 Reducing power assay
bohydrate hydrolyzing enzymes such as -amylase and The reducing power assay was carried out according to
-glucosidase in the digestive tract. Inhibitors of this en- the procedure described by Oyaizu[22]. A volume of 2.5 mL of
zymes delay carbohydrate digestion time causing a reduction solution of honey extracts and standard butylated hydroxy-
in the rate of glucose absorption and consequently blunting toluene with different concentrations (1.5, 3, 4.5 and
the postprandial plasma glucose rise[17]. 6 mgmL1 of methanol) were mixed with 2.5 mL of
In this study, phenolic compounds of honey were ex- 200 mmolL1 sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL
tracted. Antioxidant properties of honey extracts were inves- of 1% potassium ferricyanide. After incubation of this mix-
tigated by ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay ture at 50 C for 20 min, a volume of 2.5 mL of 10% tri-
and scavenging effect on 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrasyl chloroacetic acid (W/V) was added and the mixture was cen-
(DPPH) radicals. Moreover, -amylase inhibition assay of trifuged at 1 000 rmin1 in a refrigerated centrifuge at 4 C
honey extracts was also studied. (Remi Elektrotechnik Ltd, Vasai, India). The homogenized
mixture consists of 5 mL of the upper layer, 5 mL of deion-
2 Materials and Methods ized water and 1 mL of 0.1% of ferric chloride. Then the
2.1 Honey sample solution absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at
Honey samples were collected from Pudur (Vellore dis- 700 nm. All the assays were carried out in triplicate.
trict, Tamil Nadu, India). This sample was harvested from 2.4.2 Scavenging effect assay
honey bee nests of tamarind tree, with the help of profes- The capacity to scavenge the 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhy-
sional honey collectors. Honey samples were stored in the drazyl (DPPH) free radical was monitored according to a
dark until analyzed. method reported before[23]. Volumes of 0.3 mL of various
2.2 Chemicals concentrations of honey extracts and standard butylated hy-
Amberlite XAD-2 was purchased from supelco. 1, droxytoluene (1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mgmL1 of methanol) were
1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), -amylase, methanol, mixed with 2.7 mL of methanolic solution containing DPPH
diethyl ether, potassium ferricyanide, trichloro acetic acid, radicals (6 105 molL1). Each mixture was shaken vigor-
ferric chloride, Butylated hydroxyltoluene (BHT), sodium ously and left to stand in the dark until a stable absorption
phosphate buffer, dinitro salicylic acid reagent solution, so- value was obtained at 517 nm. DPPH scavenging effect was
dium carbonate and all chemical agents used were purchased calculated as percentage of DPPH discoloration using the
from Sigma-Aldrich. equation: scavenging effect (%) = [(ADPPH-AS)/ADPPH]
2.3 Extraction of phenolic compounds 100, where AS is the absorbance of the solution at each level
Extraction was carried out as described previously[18-21]. of the sample extract added and ADPPH is the absorbance of
Sixty grams of Amberlite XAD-2 resin, pore size 9 nm, parti- the DPPH solution. All the assays were carried out in tripli-
cle size 0.31.2 mm (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) were cate.
soaked in methanol for 10 min. After that most of methanol 2.5 -Amylase inhibition assay
was decanted and replaced by distilled water. The mixture The -amylase inhibition assay was carried out accord-
was stirred, allowed to stand for 510 min and was packed ing to the procedure reported by[13]. 500 L of various con-
into the glass column (25 cm 2 cm). centrations (4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 gmL1 of methanol) of ho-
Honey (2550) g was dissolved in 250 mL of distilled ney extract and 500 L of 0.02 molL1 sodium phosphate
water, and the pH of the solution was adjusted to pH 2.0 by buffer (pH 6.9 with 0.006 molL1 NaCl) containing
adding concentrated HCl. The solution was filtered slowly -amylase solution (0.5 mgmL1) were incubated for 10 min
through the column with Amberlite XAD-2 resin. The col- at 25 C. After pre-incubation, 500 L of 1% starch solution
umn was washed with 250 mL of acidified water (pH 2 with in 0.02 molL1 sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.9 with 0.006
HCl) and subsequently rinsed with 300 mL of neutral dis- molL1 NaCl) was added to each tube. The reaction mixtures
tilled water to remove all sugars and other polar compounds were then incubated at 25 C for 10 min. The reaction was
of honey or beebread. The phenolic compounds were eluted stopped with 1.0 mL of dinitrosalicylic acid color reagent.
from the sorbent with 250 mL of methanol. The methanol The test tubes were then incubated in a boiling water bath for
extracts were concentrated under vacuum at 40 C in a rotary 5 min and cooled to room temperature. The reaction mixture
evaporator (Super fit continental private limited, Mumbai). was then diluted after adding 10 mL of distilled water and
The residue was dissolved in 5 mL of distilled water and absorbance was measured at 540 nm; -amylase inhibition
extracted three times with 5 mL of diethyl ether. The ether assay was calculated using the formula (%) = [(A540 con-
Subashini Devarajan, et al. /Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines 2012, 10(4): 255259
trolA540 extract)/A540 control] 100 Phenolic compounds contribute significantly to the anti-
2.6 Statistical analysis oxidant activity of honey, but in spite of this, it seems that
All analyses were carried out in triplicate and the data antioxidant activity appears to be a result of the combined
were expressed as mean standard error (SE). The standard activity of honey flavonoids (chrysin, pinocembrin, pino-
errors were calculated using MS Excel software. banksin, quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, galangin, apigenin,
hesperetin, and myricetin), phenolic acids (caffeic, coumaric,
3 Results
ferrulic, ellagic, and chlorogenic), ascorbic acid, catalase,
3.1 Antioxidant assays peroxidase, carotenoids and products of the Maillard reac-
Several publications dealing with antioxidant activity of tion[5-6]. The quantity of these components varies widely ac-
raw honey have been reported[24-25] and no such information cording to the floral and geographical origin of honey. Many
about antioxidant properties of the phenolic compounds in studies indicated that the antioxidant activity of honey varies
the extracts of Indian honey was available. So the present widely, depending on the floral source. It was reported that
study dealt with the antioxidant potential of phenolic com- the botanical origin of honey is not only the factor contribut-
pounds in honey extract and it was measured by two different ing to its antioxidant activity, but the phytochemical compo-
biochemical assays: reducing power and scavenging activity sition of the same botanical species depending on plant che-
on DPPH radicals. motype and various environmental factors has the greatest
3.2 Reducing power assay influence on its antioxidant activity[26]. Jose and Sara ana-
The reducing power of phenolic compounds of honey lyzed that the phytochemicals present in honey may augment
extract is shown in Fig. 1. The presence of antioxidants (i.e. defences against oxidative stress and might be able to protect
reducers) caused the reduction of ferricyanide complex to the humans, thus creating potentially protective antioxidant bar-
ferrous form, which can be measured by the formation of rier[27].
Perls Prussian blue at 700 nm. The reducing power of honey By comparing our present findings with those reported
extracts and standard BHT increases with increase in concen- by Leticia et al[28], we noted that the radical scavenging and
tration (Table 1). Different concentrations (1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 reducing power activities of Indian honey were higher than
mg) of methanolic honey extract and standard BHT were the activities of Northeast Portugal honey, Hawaiian Christ-
examined (Fig. 1). At 6 mg of honey extract and BHT, the mas berry, Tupelo, Sweet clover, Soy bean and Acacia honeys.
reducing power was 0.895 and 0.99 respectively; at 4.5 mg, In our findings, at 6 mg concentration of honey extract, the
the reducing power was 0.535 and 0.65 respectively; at 3 mg, scavenging effect and reducing power was 86.8 % and 0.895
the reducing power was 0.3 and 0.465 respectively; at 1.5 mg, Abs whereas, in Northeast Portugal honey extract, the scav-
the reducing power was 0.195 and 0.34 respectively. All these enging effect and reducing power was 69.2% and 0.79 Abs at
50 mg concentration. Drastic differences in the extract con-
centration were observed. These results showed that honey
extract has both higher scavenging activity and reducing
power. Therefore, further studies of the antioxidant compo-
nents of Indian honey are required, especially identification
and quantification of individual flavonoids and phenolic ac-
ids.
3.3 Radical scavenging effect assay
The radical scavenging effects of honey extracts were
tested using methanolic solution of the stable DPPH free
radical which exhibits a deep purple color with maximum
Fig. 1 Reducing power of methanolic extracts from honey absorption at 517 nm. Antioxidant molecules can quench
DPPH radicals, resulting in discoloration of DPPH because
Table 1 Reducing power of methanolic extracts from honey
of their conversion into a colorless product (i.e. 2,
(mean SE, n = 3)
2-diphenyl-1-hydrazine or a substituted analogous hydrazine).
Reducing power activity, A700 nm The more rapidly the absorbance decreases, the more potent
No. c/(mgmL 1) the antioxidant activity of the honey extract is. Different
Butylated hydroxy- Honey ex-
toluene (BHT) tract concentrations (1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mg) of methanolic honey
1 1.5 0.34 0.02 0.19 0.01 extract and standard BHT were examined (Fig. 2). Results are
2 3 0.46 0.02 0.3 0.02
expressed as the percentage (Table 2) of sample absorbance
decrease relatively to the absorbance of DPPH solution in the
3 4.5 0.65 0.02 0.53 0.01
absence of extract at 517 nm. The scavenging effects of
4 6 0.99 0.01 0.89 0.03
Subashini Devarajan, et al. /Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines 2012, 10(4): 255259
1 4 30.5 0.92
2 8 64.8 1.85
3 12 70.3 3.70
4 16 87.0 3.70
5 20 88.8 1.85
Fig. 2 Scavenging effect (%) on DPPH radicals of methano- as the percentage of sample absorbance decrease relative to
lic extracts from honey the absorbance of control solution in the absence of extract at
540 nm. The percent inhibition varied from 87% to 30.5 %
Table 2 Scavenging effect (%) on DPPH radicals of metha-
from the highest (20 gmL1) to the lowest concentration (4
nolic extracts from honey (mean SE, n = 3)
gmL1).
DPPH Scavenging activity/% Weston et al revealed that during honey extraction proc-
No. c/(mgmL 1) Butylated hydroxy- Honey ess by column chromatography, sugar and polar compounds
toluene (BHT) extract
were washed with water[29]. In addition by using diethylether,
1 1.5 82.3 0.27 78.6 1.44
the non-flavonoid phenolic compounds were eliminated,
2 3 91.7 0.45 77.8 0.45 which contaminated the flavonoid peaks; thus the main di-
3 4.5 95.3 0.09 82.3 0.27 ethyl ether contents contain only flavonoids. Kanjiro et al
4 6 96.7 0 86.8 0.27 suggested that luteolin, myrcetin and quercetin were potent
inhibitors against porcine pancreatic amylase[30]. All these
honey extract on DPPH radicals increases with increase in flavonoids were present in honey extract, so flavonoids pre-
concentration. At 6 mg concentration of honey extract and sent in honey extract might act as potent inhibitors against
BHT, the scavenging effect was 86.8% and 96.7%, whereas porcine pancreatic amylase. Natural -amylase inhibitors
82.3% and 95.3% at 4.5 mg concentration, 77.8% and 91.7% from herbal sources offer an attractive therapeutic approach
at 3 mg concentration, 78.6 % and 82.3 % at 1.5 mg concen- to the treatment of postprandial hyperglycemia by decreasing
tration. All these assays are averages of the results obtained glucose release from starch and have potential for the treat-
from triplicate assays. ment of diabetes mellitus and obesity[31-32]. -amylase inhibi-
3.4 -amylase inhibition assay tors from honey are potentially safer, and therefore may be a
The inhibitory activity of phenolic honey extracts against preferred alternative for inhibition of carbohydrate break-
porcine pancreatic amylase is shown in Fig 3. The honey down and control of glycemic index of food products.
extract showed a significant -amylase inhibitory activity Therefore, the phenolic compounds namely the flavon-
under in vitro conditions. Concentration dependant inhibitory oids in honey extract, may render a good source of both an-
activity of -amylase was observed at 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 tioxidant and -amylase inhibition activity besides their ef-
gmL1 of phenolic compounds of honey (Table 3). At 20 g fect as antibacterial thus increasing its potential therapeutic
of honey extract, the inhibitory activity was 88.8 %, whereas, activity.
16, 12, 8 and 4 g of honey extract, exhibited 87 %, 70.3 %,
Acknowledgement
64.8 %, and 30.5 % inhibitory activity. Results are expressed
The authors wish to thank the management of VIT Uni-
versity for providing necessary facilities. We would like to
thank, Prof. LI Zhi-Yong, Shanghai Jiao Tong University for
translating abstract into Chinese language.
References
[1] Allsop KA, Miller JB. Honey revisited: a reappraisal of ho
ney in pre-industrial diets [J]. Br J Nutr, 1996, 75(4):
513-520.
[2] Krell R. Value added products from bee keeping [M]. Rome:
FAO Agricultural services Bulletin, Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations, 1996, 1010-1365.
Fig. 3 -amylase inhibition of methanolic extracts from [3] Cherbuliez T. Medicine from the bees[M]. Rome: Apimondia
honey Standing Commission for Apitherapy, 2001.
Subashini Devarajan, et al. /Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines 2012, 10(4): 255259