A. Courts: Who interprets the Constitution and the law
1. Judicial Power Defined: the authority to settle justiciable controversies or disputes involving rights that are enforceable and demandable before the courts of justice or the redress of wrongs for violations of such rights. a. Lopez v. Roxas: Lopez, who won in the elections for VP, contests an electoral protest by his opponent on the grounds that the PET is unconstitutional, and that it is a court inferior to the Supreme Court. The Court is only one although the functions may be distinct and separate. The PET is the same court as SC although the functions are more limited than that exercised by the SC
2. Separation and Blending of Powers:
a. Angara v. Electoral Commission: the separations of powers obtains not through express provision by by actual division in our Constitution. Every department of the government has exclusive cognizance of matters within its jurisdiction, and is supreme within its own sphere. But it does not follow from the fact that the three powers are to be kept separate and distinct that the Constitution intended them to be absolutely unrestrained and independent of each other. The Constitution has provided for an elaborate system of checks and balances to secure coordination in the workings of the various departments of the government. The overlapping and interlacing of functions and duties between the several departments, however, sometimes makes it hard to say just where the one leaves off and the other begins. In cases of conflict, the judicial department is the only constitutional organ which can be called upon to determine the proper allocation of powers between the several departments and among the integral or constituent units thereof.
3. Hierarchy of the Philippine Judicial System:
a. Doctrine of Hierarchy of Courts: The doctrine of hierarchy of courts was established in order to ...shield the Court from having to deal with causes that are so well within the competence of lower courts...[The SC] to deal with more fundamental and more essential tasks that the Constitution assigned to it. To assure the efficiency of the judiciary in its designated roles. i. Diocese of Bacolod v. Commission on Elections: (case where a political tarpaulin showing electoral candidates support or lack thereof on the RH Law, was posted on a church) Regional Branches (writs within territorial boundaries) < CA (appellate court that reviews the determination of facts and law made by the trial courts. Collegiate in nature and has original jurisdiction over most special civil actions) < SC (leads the judiciary by breaking new ground or further reiterating existing precedents. Role is to interpret the Cosntitution and act in order to protect constitutional rights when these become exigent) GENERAL RULE: SC has full discretionary power to take cognizance and assume jurisdiction over special civil actions for certiorari filed directly with it for exceptional compelling reasons or if warranted by specific issues raised in petition. EXCEPTION: 1. Genuine issues of constitutionality that must be addressed at the most immediate time; and, 2. Issues of transcendental importance
b. Highest Court of the Land: The Supreme Court
i. En banc and division cases: ii. Rule Making Powers: c. Third Level Courts: i. Court of Appeals: ii. Court of Tax Appeals: iii. Sandiganbayan: d. Second Level Courts: i. Regional Trial Courts: e. First Level Courts: i. Municipal Trial Courts, Metropolitan Trial Courts, and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts 4. Jurisdiction: a. Echegaray v. Secretary of Justice