Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
2.1 Overview
A range of factors influence design choices for road projects. Design characteristics and
values adopted must provide a satisfactory service to roads users, and be economically
viable within the financial, topographical, and environmental constraints that may exist.
There are many aspects to be considered in the planning and design of road projects.
Chapter 2 provides guidance on:
A design for new road or major reconstruction should take into account the following criteria:
The project satisfies the purpose and needs, as agreed to by a full range of
stakeholders. This agreement is forged in the earliest phase of the project
and amended as warranted as the project develops.
The project is a safe facility for both the user and the community.
The project is in harmony with the community, and it preserves
environmental, scenic, aesthetic, historic and natural resource values of the
area (i.e. exhibits context sensitive design).
Page 6
The project exceeds the expectations of both designers and stakeholders,
and achieves a level of excellence in peoples minds.
The project involves the efficient and effective use of the resources (e.g. time,
budget, community) of all involved parties.
The project is designed and built with minimal disruption to the community.
The project is seen as having added lasting value to the community.
2. Characteristics of the process contributing to excellence. The following apply:
For additional guidance on content sensitive solutions, the user should review the following
documents:
Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council Abu Dhabi Urban Street Design Manual (4)
NCHRP Report 480 A Guide to Best Practice for Achieving Context Sensitive
Solutions (5).
An ITE Recommended Practice, Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A
Context Sensitive Approach (6).
AASHTO A Guide for Achieving Flexibility in Highway Design (7)
NCHRP Report 642 Quantifying the Benefits of Context Sensitive Solutions (8)
Page 7
2.3 Sustainability
The overall goals of sustainable development are to meet human need and improve quality
of life to live within the earths ecological carrying capacity, and maintain or enhance its
natural capital; and to protect future generations from reduced quality of life. These goals
are achieved by addressing three dimensions of sustainability:
1. Economic development. Ensure that the financial and economic needs of current
and future generations are met.
3. Social equity. Improve the quality of life for all people and promote equity between
societies, groups and generations.
Estidama, which is the Arabic word for sustainability, is the intellectual legacy of the late
Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan and a manifestation of visionary governance promoting
thoughtful and responsible development. The leadership of Abu Dhabi are progressing the
principles and imperatives for sustainable development, through Estidama, while recognising
that the unique cultural, climatic, and economic development needs of the region require a
more localized definition of sustainability.
The ultimate goal of Estidama is to preserve and enrich Abu Dhabi's physical and cultural
identity, while creating an always improving quality of life for its residents on four equal
pillars of sustainability: environmental, economic, social, and cultural. For additional
information on Estidama in Abu Dhabi, see www.estidama.org (9).
Transportation plays a key role in the global economy, and in the challenges and
opportunities associated with sustainable development. Sustainable transportation can be
viewed as an expression of sustainable development in the transportation sector.
Sustainable transportation addresses local, regional, national, and global issues and,
therefore, requires considerable coordination. It is important to apply sustainable
transportation in a holistic and integrated manner across the various sectors (external to
transportation) to ensure that key concerns such as depletion of resources, global climate
change, disruption of ecosystems and toxic pollution are effectively addressed.
allows the basic access needs of individuals and societies to be met safely and in a
manner consistent with human and ecosystem health, and with equity within and
between generations;
is affordable, operates efficiently, offers choice of transport mode, and supports a
vibrant economy; and
limits emissions and waste within the planets ability to absorb them, minimises
consumption of non-renewable resources, limits consumption of renewable
resources to the sustainable yield level, reuses and recycles its components, and
minimises the use of land and the production of noise.
Page 8
For additional information on sustainability, the user should review the following documents:
Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council Abu Dhabi Urban Street Design Manual (4)
Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council Public Realm Design Manual (10)
US Federal Highway Administrations Transportation Planning for Sustainability
Guidebook (11)
Center for Environmental Excellence by AASHTO website (12)
The functional classification concept is one of the most important determining factors in
roadway design. In this concept, roads are grouped by the character of service they provide.
Functional classification recognizes that the public road network in Abu Dhabi serves two
basic and often conflicting functions access to property and travel mobility. See Figure
2.1. Each road or street will provide varying levels of access and mobility, depending upon
its intended service. The overall objective of the functional classification system, when
viewed in its entirety, is to yield an optimum balance between its access and mobility
purposes. When achieved, the benefits to the travelling public will be maximised.
The functional classification system provides the framework for determining the geometric
design of individual roadways and streets. Once the function of the roadway facility is
defined, the designer can select an appropriate design speed, roadway width, roadside
safety elements, amenities, and other design values. The Abu Dhabi Road Geometric
Design Manual is based upon this systematic concept to determine roadway design.
Table 2.1 summarises the principle features for each functional classification. For additional
guidance on functional classifications, see AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets (1).
Page 9
Figure 2-1: Relationship of functionally classified systems in serving traffic mobility
and land access (1)
1. Principal arterial system. The rural principal arterial system consists of a connected
rural network of continuous routes having the following characteristics:
Serve corridor movements having trip length and travel density characteristics
indicative of substantial inter- and intra-Emirate wide travel.
Serve all or virtually all urban areas with population of 30,000 and over, and a
large majority of those with population of 20,000 and over.
Provide an integrated network without stub connections, except where
unusual geographic or traffic flow conditions dictate otherwise (e.g.
international boundary connections and connections to coastal cities).
Page 10
Table 2.1: Characteristics of roads by class (4)
Road Classifications
Characteristic
Freeways Expressways Arterials Collectors Local Roads
Land access
Restricted Land access a and traffic Land access
Land Service No Access access from secondary movement of the primary
service roads consideration equal consideration
importance
Land access
Traffic Traffic
and traffic
Optimum Optimum movement the movement the
Traffic Service movement of
mobility mobility primary secondary
equal
consideration consideration
importance
Typical
Urban: 1.5 km Urban: > 1 km Urban: >200 m Urban: as
Intersection/ Urban: >400 m
Rural: >3 to 5 Rural: 3 to 5 Rural: 400 m to required
interchange Rural: >1.5 km
km km 1.5 km Rural: > 200 m
Spacing
Uninterrupted
Nature of traffic
Free flow Free flow flow except at Interrupted flow Interrupted flow
flow
intersections
Freeways
Freeways Freeways Arterials
Expressways Collectors
Connect to Expressways Expressways Collectors
Arterials Local roads
Arterials Arterials Local roads
Collectors
Notes:
*In industrial areas, collectors should accommodate all types of vehicle.
**In industrial and rural areas, trucks may require considerations.
The rural principal arterial system is divided into the following subcategories:
a. Freeways. The freeway is the highest level of an arterial. These facilities are
characterized by full control of access, high design speeds, and a high level
of driver comfort and safety. For these reasons, freeways are considered a
special type of road within the functional classification system, and separate
design criteria have been developed for rural freeways.
Page 11
2. Minor arterials. Rural minor arterial system, in conjunction with the principal arterial
system, should form a rural network having the following characteristics:
a. Links. Arterials should link cities, larger towns and other traffic generators
that are capable of attracting travel over similarly long distances.
c. Service. Arterials should provide service to roads with trip length and travel
density greater than those predominantly served by rural collectors or local
systems. Minor arterial routes have relatively high overall speeds and
minimum interference to through traffic.
3. Collector roads. The function of rural collector roads is to collect traffic flow from the
rural local roads to the rural arterials and to distribute traffic flow from arterials back
to the local roads. Access to properties is normally allowed on collector roads. In
rural areas, the function of collector is twofold: To provide access to adjacent land
uses and to carry traffic into areas with sparse development. Collector roads are
further defined as follows:
a. Major collector roads. These routes serve larger towns and significant traffic
generators (e.g. shipping ports, mining areas) that are not served by an
arterial, expressway, or freeway. They also link these locations with higher
classified routes.
b. Minor collector roads. These roads are spaced at intervals consistent with
the traffic population density to accumulate traffic from local roads, provide
service to smaller communities, and link locally important traffic generators.
4. Local roads. Rural local roads generally have the following characteristics:
Page 12
Table 2.2: Guidelines for rural functional systems (U.S.) (1)
System Percentage of total rural road length
The functional classification of urban roads and streets is usually less clear than that of rural
roads, as urban roads and streets generally are flanked by dense development that requires
frequent access at the boundary of the road. Historical requirements for curb side parking
and other uses (e.g. public transport routes or bicycle routes) further complicate functional
definitions.
Most urban arterial roads continue to function as major through traffic routes, but the
management of these roads often requires space to be dedicated to public transport or
bicycle use in preference to private car travel. There is also a trend on outer urban roads for
speed limits to be lowered to address pedestrian safety issues while sections of inner city
streets (formerly through arterial routes) are sometimes converted to pedestrian areas or
shared zones. Consequently, the function of particular sections of road may change over
time in accordance with community values. To better define urban roads and streets based
on context sensitive street design, the Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council defines urban
streets with a two name convention as described in Section 2.4.4. The first name is the
context name, based on the land use context, and the second is the street family name,
based on the transport capacity.
1. Principal arterial system. In general, the urban principal arterial system carries the
highest traffic volumes and accommodates the greatest trip lengths. The following
are the main characteristics for streets and roads of the urban principal arterial
system:
serves the major traffic movements within urbanised areas connecting central
business districts, outlying residential areas, major intercity communities and
major urban centres;
serves a major portion of the trips entering and leaving the urban area, as
well as the majority of the through traffic desiring to bypass the city; and
Page 13
provides continuity for all rural arterials that intercept the urban area.
The principal arterial system is segregated as follows:
provide service to, through or around urban areas from rural arterial
routes, and may be connecting links;
serve generally as an extension of a rural arterial road;
typically the access is controlled by regulation; and
provide for an integrated network serving the entire urban area.
2. Minor arterials. Minor arterials include all arterials not classified as principal arterials.
These routes have the following general characteristics:
Page 14
Table 2.3 provides typical percentages of urban functional classifications.
1. Boulevard. A boulevard is a high vehicle capacity 3+3 street (three lanes in each
direction). Boulevards may have frontage lanes. Existing streets with 3+3 lanes or
more are also classified as boulevards.
2. Avenue. An avenue is a medium vehicle capacity 2+2 (two lanes in each direction)
street. Avenues may have frontage lanes.
3. Street. A street is a low vehicle capacity 1+1 street (one lane in each direction).
They typically have low traffic volumes and low speeds.
4. Access lane. An access lane is a very low volume capacity 1+1 street. They typically
have very low traffic volumes and very low speeds.
Table 2.4 illustrates the relationship between the Abu Dhabi street family and AASHTO
functional classification systems.
Page 15
Table 2.4: Relationship between street family and functional classification systems (4)
AASHTO functional classification
Street family Principal Minor
Collector Local
arterial arterial
Boulevard X X
Avenue X X (major collectors)
Street X (minor collectors X
Access lane X
2.5 Speed
2.5.1 Design speed
The project design speed is the selected speed for each project that will establish criteria for
several design elements, including horizontal and vertical curvature, superelevation, sight
distance, etc. The assumed design speed should be a logical one with respect to the
topography, anticipated operating speed, the adjacent land use, and functional classification.
Except for local streets where speed controls are frequently included intentionally and on
non-freeway urban streets, the designer should make every effort to use as high a design
speed as practical to attain a desired degree of safety, mobility, and efficiency. The selected
design speed should reflect the actual operating speeds to ensure the safe and efficient
movement of traffic. The selected design speed should not be less than the intended posted
speed limit. Table 2.5 shows the recommended design speeds for each roadway functional
classification.
Page 16
running speed is the distance summation for all vehicles divided by the running time of all
vehicles. By measuring average running speeds at various locations along an existing
section of road, the designer can identify those locations in similar terrain where speeds are
not uniform with the rest of the section and make decisions for improvements.
The average running speed is use to determine the minimum acceptable acceleration or
deceleration distances for freeway entrance and exit ramps). For all other geometric design
elements, use the selected design speed to determine the appropriate design criteria.
Page 17
Table 2.6: Recommended posted speed
Design speed Posted speed
(km/h) (km/h)
30 40 30 40
50 40
60 50
70 60
80 60
90 70
100 80
120 100
140 120
Trucks typically accelerate more slowly from a stop condition and experience greater
difficulty in maintaining desirable speeds on long, steep upgrades than automobiles. Truck
characteristics affecting speed on upgrades include mass, power, aerodynamic resistance,
drive-train-to-gear ratios and tires.
The number heavy vehicles are converted to equivalent passage cars for capacity analysis
purposes. The equivalent ratio is determined based on speed, terrain, power, etc., of the
heavy vehicle. See the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (13) for applicable equivalency
ratios.
1. Size. Vehicular sizes determine lane and shoulder widths, vertical clearances and,
indirectly, roadway capacity calculations.
2. Offtracking. The design of intersection turning radii, travelled way widening for
horizontal curves, and pavement widths for interchange ramps are usually controlled
by the largest design vehicle likely to use the facility with some frequency.
Page 18
3. Storage requirements. Turn bay storage lengths, bus turnouts, and parking lot
layouts are determined by the number and types of vehicles to be accommodated.
4. Sight distance. Eye height and braking distances vary for passenger cars and trucks,
which can impact sight distance considerations.
5. Acceleration and deceleration. Acceleration and deceleration rates often govern the
dimensioning of such design features as speed-change lanes at intersections or
interchange ramps, climbing lanes, or passing lanes.
6. Vehicular stability. Certain vehicles with high centres of gravity may be prone to
skidding or overturning, affecting design speed selection, and superelevation design
elements.
Tables 2.7 and 2.8 present design vehicular dimensions and minimum turning radii for
design vehicles used in Abu Dhabi. These tables can be used to input vehicle dimensions
into turning template software (e.g. AutoTurn). Figures 2.2 and 2.3 illustrate the application
of the basic dimensions for combination trucks.
Page 19
Table 2.7: Minimum turning radii of design vehicles (1-revised)
Minimum design Centreline*
Minimum inside
Design vehicle type Symbol turning radius turning radius
radius (m)
(m) (CTR) (m)
Intermediate
WB-12 12.16 10.97 5.88
semitrailer
Intermediate
WB-15 13.66 12.50 5.20
semitrailer
Interstate
WB-20 13.66 12.50 0.59
semitrailer
Double trailer
WB-33D 18.25 17.04 4.19
combination
* The turning radius assumed by a designer when investigating possible turning paths and is set at
the centreline of the front axle of a vehicle. If the minimum turning path is assumed, the CTR
approximately equals the minimum design turning radius minus one-half the front width of the
vehicle.
Page 20
Table 2.8: Design vehicle dimensions (1-revised)
Page 21
Figure 2-2: Basic dimension of tractorsemitrailer vehicle
Page 22
Page 23
trailer vehicle (double trailer)
S = Distance from the rear effective axle to the hitch point or point of articulation
1. Turning Radius. The circular arc formed by the turning path radius of the front outside tire of a
vehicle. This radius is also described by vehicular manufacturers as the turning curb radius.
2. CTR. The turning radius assumed by a designer when investigating possible turning paths. It is
set at the centre of the front axle of a vehicle.
3. Offtracking. The difference in the paths of the front and rear wheels of a vehicle as it negotiates a
turn. The path of each rearward tire of a turning vehicle does not coincide with that of the
corresponding forward tire. This phenomenon is shown in the drawing above.
4. Swept Path Width. The amount of roadway width that a vehicle covers in negotiating a turn equal
to the amount of offtracking, plus the width of the vehicle. The most significant dimension
affecting the swept path width of a tractor/semitrailer is the distance from the kingpin to the rear
trailer axle or axles. The greater this distance, the greater the swept path width.
5. Steering Angle. The maximum angle of turn built into the steering mechanism of the front wheels
of a vehicle. This maximum angle controls the minimum turning radius of the vehicle.
6. Tractor/Trailer Angle. The angle between adjoining units of a tractor/semitrailer when the
combination unit is placed into a turn. This angle is measured between the longitudinal axes of
the tractor and trailer as the vehicle turns. The maximum tractor/trailer angle occurs when a
vehicle makes a 180 turn at the minimum turning radius and is reached slightly beyond the point
where a maximum swept path width is achieved.
Page 24
and reconstruction projects, the recommended design year is 20 years from the expected
construction completion date.
The basic measure of the traffic demand for a road is the average daily traffic (ADT) volume.
The ADT is defined as the total volume during a given time period (in whole days), greater
than one day and less than one year, divided by the number of days in that time period. The
current ADT volume for a road can be readily determined when continuous traffic counts are
available. When only periodic counts are taken, the ADT volume can be estimated by
adjusting the periodic counts according to the season, month or day of week.
A key design decision involves determining which hourly traffic volume should be used for
design. The selected design hourly volume (DHV) should not be so low that it is often
exceeded, or so high that traffic would rarely be sufficient to make full use of the resulting
facility. The selection of an appropriate hour for planning, design, and operational purposes
is a compromise between providing an adequate level of service for nearly every hour of the
year and providing economic efficiency. For rural and recreational routes, the 30th highest
hour is typically used for the DHV. For urban areas, the 100th hour is often used as the DHV.
The designer should review the resulting traffic conditions from the selected design hour to
ensure the acceptability of the design (i.e. meets the needs of drivers).
Page 25
Common practice is to use a peak 15-minute rate of flow. Flow rates are usually expressed
in vehicles per hour, not vehicles per 15 minutes. The relationship between the peak 15-
minute flow rate and the full hourly volume is given by the peak-hour factor (PHF) as shown
in Equation 2:1:
Example 2.71
Given: One hour traffic count (7:00 8:00) along a rural freeway:
Typical peak-hour factors for freeways range between 0.80 and 0.95. Lower factors are
more typical for rural freeways or off-peak conditions. Higher factors are typical of urban
peak-hour conditions.
A dual carriageway with a high percentage of traffic in one direction during the peak hours
may need more lanes than a road having the same ADT, but an equal percentage of
directional traffic. During peak hours on most rural roads, 55% to 70% of the traffic is
travelling in the peak direction, with up to as much as 80% occasionally. Directional
Page 26
distributions of traffic vary enough between sites that two dual carriageways carrying equal
traffic may have significantly different peak direction volumes.
Some studies have shown that urban radial routes may have up to 66% of the traffic
travelling in the same direction during the peak hour. Unfortunately, this peak occurs in one
direction in the morning and the opposite direction in the evening. Consequently, both
directions of the facility must have capacity for the peak directional flow. Urban
circumferential routes often have a 50/50 split during the peak hours for a more balanced
flow.
The directional distribution of traffic during the DHV should be determined by making field
measurements on the facility under consideration or on parallel and similar facilities.
In designing intersections and interchanges, the volumes of all movements occurring during
the design hour is required. This information is necessary for both the morning and evening
peak periods because the traffic pattern may change significantly from one peak hour to the
other.
For geometric design, it is essential to have traffic data on the types of vehicles expected for
the roadway facility. These data generally indicate the major types of trucks and buses as
percentages of all traffic expected to use the road. At intersections, the percentage of trucks
during the morning and evening peak hours should be determined separately. Variations in
truck traffic between the various traffic movements at intersections may be substantial and
may influence the appropriate geometric layout.
Page 27
levels of analysis (operations, design, preliminary engineering, and planning);
travel modes (automobile and other motorized vehicles, pedestrians, bicycle, and
transit where it is part of a multimodal urban street facility);
spatial coverage (points, segments, and facilities); and
temporal coverage (undersaturated and oversaturated conditions).
The HCM provides tools to assist in estimating performance measures for individual
elements of a multimodal transportation system, as well as guidance on combining those
elements to evaluate larger portions of the system. Table 2.9 provides the system elements
and the service measurements used in the HCM.
The HCM was developed for the conditions in North America and, in particular, the United
States. Consequently, the designer should carefully evaluate the default values provided in
the HCM to ensure they are accurate for the conditions in Abu Dhabi.
Page 28
Table 2.9: HCM service measures (13)
Service measure(s) Systems
HCM
System element analysis
chapter Automobile Pedestrian Bicycle Transit
measure
Freeway facility 10 Density Speed
Basic freeway segment 11 Density Speed
Freeway weaving
12 Density Speed
segment
Freeway merge and
13 Density Speed
diverge segments
LOS
Multilane road 14 Density Speed
Score
Percent
time spent LOS
Two-lane road 15 Speed
following, Score
speed
LOS LOS LOS
Urban street facility 16 Speed Speed
Score Score Score
LOS LOS LOS
Urban street segment 17 Speed Speed
Score Score Score
LOS LOS
Signalised intersection 18 Delay Delay
Score Score
Two-way stop 19 Delay Delay Delay
All-way stop 20 Delay Delay
Roundabout 21 Delay Delay
Interchange ramp
22 Delay Delay
terminal
Off-street pedestrian- Space LOS
23 Speed
bicycle facility events Score
The HCM explains the quality of traffic service provided by particular roadways under
specific traffic demands by means of a LOS. The LOS summarizes the operating conditions
on the roadway in terms of traffic performance measures related to speed, travel time,
manoeuvrability, interruptions, comfort, and convenience. The LOS range from LOS A
(free flow) to LOS F (breakdown flow). Table 2.10 shows the typical operating conditions
represented by these LOS. Each facility type generally has its own specific definitions for
LOS.
The HCM does not contain guidance for the usability of the LOS in roadway design. The
LOS criteria for roadway design are provide in Chapter 7 Rural and Urban Freeways,
Chapter 8 Rural Roads, and Chapter 9 Urban Streets. In general, the designer should
strive to provide the highest LOS practical. However, in urban environments, the designer
needs to consider other factors (e.g. pedestrians, bicycles, level of development). In these
cases, it may be more desirable to accept a lower LOS than otherwise may have been
provided.
Page 29
Table 2.10: General definitions of LOS (13)
Level of service General operating conditions
A Free flow
B Reasonably free flow
C Stable flow
D Approaching unstable flow
E Unstable flow
F Breakdown flow
Note: Specific definitions of LOS A F vary by facility type and are presented in
the HCM (13).
The area surrounding a proposed road is an interrelated system of natural (e.g. wind, sand),
synthetic, and sociologic variables. Changes in one variable within this system cannot be
made without some effect on other variables. The consequences of some of these effects
may be negligible, but others may have a strong and lasting impact on the environment,
including the sustenance and quality of human life. Because road location and design
decisions have an effect on the development of adjacent areas, it is important that
environmental variables be given full consideration, as listed below:
For additional guidance on environmental considerations, review the Abu Dhabi Planning
Council ESTIDAMA website (9), Abu Dhabi Environmental, Health, and Safety Manual for
Main Roads (14), and Abu Dhabi Environmental Assessment for Road Projects Manual (15).
Page 30
providing for easier and more economical maintenance. The procurement of sufficient right-
of-way at the time of the initial improvement permits the widening of the roadway and the
widening and strengthening of the pavement at a reasonable cost as traffic volumes
increase.
The minimum right-of-way width for all functional classifications will be the sum of the travel
lanes, outside shoulders, and median width, if applicable, plus the necessary width for fill
and cut slopes, or for roadside clear zones, whichever is greater. Desirably, the right-of-way
width will accommodate the anticipated ultimate development of the roadway and utility
services corridors. The geometric design tables in Chapter 7 Rural and Urban Freeways,
Chapter 8 Rural Roads, and Chapter 9 Urban Streets provide the minimum right-of-way
widths for roadways in Abu Dhabi.
The right-of-way width should be uniform, where practical. In urban areas, variable widths
may be necessary due to existing development; varying side slopes and embankment
heights may make it desirable to vary the right-of-way width; and right-of-way limits will likely
have to be adjusted at intersections and freeway interchanges.
In developed areas, it may be desirable to limit the right-of-way widths. However, the right-
of-way width should not be less than that required for all the elements of the design cross
sections, utility accommodation, and appropriate border areas. DoT will review all official
written requests, with justification, for departures from the minimum right-of-way
requirements. For additional guidance on determining right-of-way widths in urban
environments, see the Abu Dhabi Urban Street Design Manual (4).
In its simplest form, access management is conflict management. In the flow of traffic from
origin to destination, the fewer conflicts that occur during the driving experience, the less the
delay and the lower the probability of a crash. When the speed of the vehicle or the
frequency of access conflicts increases, the rate of conflict and the average frequency of
crashes increase. Access management techniques work to reduce both the frequency and
severity of traffic conflicts.
Access management is applied in a hierarchical manner. Freeways have the highest level of
control where access is only allowed using well-spaced, well-designed directional ramps.
The entire freeway has a non-traversable median to prohibit cross movements. As the
functional hierarchy steps down, to expressway then arterial, more access is allowed, but
must be well spaced and include design elements (e.g. turn lanes) and well-designed
transitions. See Figure 2.1.
Page 31
Access management in Abu Dhabi is a governmental program that sets standards for the
location, type, and design of any and all access points to any public road in the entire
Emirate. The program has been created and is implemented to help preserve the functional
integrity of public roads to ensure that the mobility, efficiency, and safety of public roads are
maintained for today and future generations. The Abu Dhabi Access Management Manual
(16) defines 13 access categories based on the facilitys functional classification and
whether the facility is in an urban or rural environment. See the Abu Dhabi Access
Management Manual for definitions and design requirements for each access category.
2.11.1 Drivers
There are two types of drivers typical and elderly drivers. The following provides
guidance on these drivers:
1. Typical driver. The appropriate considerations for drivers are already built into the
applicable geometric design values (e.g. stopping sight distance, horizontal
curvature, superelevation, roadway widths). Typical drivers vary widely in their
operating skills, experience, intelligence, and physical condition. The road should be
as forgiving as practical to minimise the adverse effects of driver errors. The
following discusses certain principles and driver traits that should be incorporated
into the roadway design:
a. Information processing. Drivers are limited in how quickly they can gather
information, make a decision, and take action. They must process
information related to lane placement, speed, traffic control devices, road
alignment, roadside conflicts, and weather. If the amount, complexity, or
clarity of the information is inappropriate or excessive, this may lead to driver
error.
b. Primacy. Certain driving functions are more important than others. In order
of importance they are:
i. Control. Activities related to the physical control of the vehicle via the
steering wheel, brake, or accelerator.
The designer must be aware of the relative importance of these activities and
ensure that the more important road information is properly conveyed to the
Page 32
driver. This could result in the decision to remove or relocate lower priority
information, if it is likely to interfere with the higher priority information.
2. Elderly Driver. In general, the median age of drivers is increasing. This reality
greatly emphasizes the criticality of the relationship between the driver and the
roadway environment. Although the opinions are not unanimous, there is general
agreement that advancing age has an effect on an individuals perceptual, mental,
and motor skills. It is important for the designer to be aware of the needs of the
elderly driver and, where desirable, factor these needs into the roadway design.
Do not include provisions for pedestrians and cyclists along freeways. However, consider
providing provisions for pedestrians and cyclists to safely cross the freeway at appropriate
locations (e.g. pedestrian bridges).
Chapter 13 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Facilities and the Abu Dhabi Urban Street Design
Manual (4) provide guidance on the design criteria for pedestrians and bicycle
accommodations.
Page 33
2.12 References
1. AASHTO. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2011.
2. Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council. Abu Dhabi Urban Street Design Manual,
2012.
3. NCHRP. NCHRP Report 480 A Guide to Best Practice for Achieving Context
Sensitive Solutions, National Cooperative Highway Research Program,
Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2002.
5. AASHTO. A Guide for Achieving Flexibility in Highway Design, Washington, DC, May
2004.
6. NCHRP. NCHRP Report 642 Quantifying the Benefits of Context Sensitive Solutions,
National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board,
Washington, DC, 2009.
8. Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council. Abu Dhabi Public Realm Design Manual,
2012.
12. Abu Dhabi Department of Transport. Environmental, Health, and Safety Manual for
Main Roads, 2013.
13. Abu Dhabi Department of Transport. Environmental Assessment for Road Projects
Manual, 2013.
Page 34