Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
23, 2012
Unity in this day and age is merely an ambitious word used to pacify the noise of
chaos ravaging our world. It is obvious that with our diverse cultures and ideologies,
there is only a slim chance for unity to pervade our minds. Middle Eastern countries
have been, and still are, ravaged by war and so is Africa, specifically, its malnourished
parts. Different lands are still being fought over and even if it is not controversial, there
may be still Cold Wars fought throughout the globe. Backstabbing between nations,
even within, still is apparent with the spread of conspiracies concerning issues about
acts of cloak and daggers between allied nations. Religion is still the biggest player in
facilitating our disintegration: Even in the earliest of days, wars are waged over different
fought beliefs, the truth forced unto the mouths of the non-believers, and death is
inevitable for those who fail to walk by his or her religious norms. Democrats still yell at
communists and the lesser others, vanquishing those who stand in the way of
Democracy. All in all our own bastardization of our own proposed unity reflects the
state of our world today: If we cant pursue understanding, and eliminate excessive
magnanimity, then how do we even have the right to dream as high as having a stable
Ever since, our Global Political System required nations to basically agree with
each other and adjust to each others ways of doing things particularly, on how they run
their political beliefs. One nation who upholds highly its superiority and beliefs can never
be a part of a clich. One political belief can never be effective to every nation state,
simply blending it with a foreign religion opposing such belief is already a difficult
process and if it can somehow pass, it will take lengthy adjustments that will first
produce chaos before peace (Brzezinski, 2004). Yet Vittorio Parsi (2003) tells us that
one particular aspect of our global system that promotes instability is the plurality of our
regimes. Obviously with our different ideologies and beliefs to make a perfect political
society, we can never agree with each other. That is how the Cold War started in the
first place. And yet even today, Democracy is still being forced upon nations with
cultures that do not even reflect a democratic semblance, let alone have hopes for
democracy to save them. In the end, even if the United States sent her glorious army to
the Middle East and its surrounding parts to help the people escape from the clutches of
tyranny, these soldiers and their democracy are still hated: Further concluding that,
naturally, you cant force a particular nation and expect them to swallow Democracy or
any other regime overnight it takes a lengthy process. Therefore, what is the best
solution? Parsi (2003) states that it all should take a certain kind of understanding
based on the principles and cultures of that particular nation. And by understanding and
adjusting, one can form a certain kind of regime fit for that particular nation but still
embedded with a basic concept of democracy. In the end, it all takes adjustment and
political beliefs.
If unity based on understanding, adjusting, and consideration are the basic ways
to achieve a stable global system, it should be considered shallow and not applicable to
the complications provided by our modern world. Yes, we do have problems that badly
need these qualities to have a morally stable world order that wasnt always apparent
because of our nature to achieve more power than any other nations, but to say that
these qualities are the key is rather idealistic and has a tendency not to be followed. To
remedy this poor thought, think that maybe the instability we experience today may just
be a part a bigger process and in turn it could have been a part of a very long cycle all
along.
change in superior power, imbalance can be fixed (Modelski, 2002). Modelski (2002)
also stated that by studying long cycles based on the rise and fall of Global powers, it
actuated a lineage that formed Democracy. And, while the world powers are in the
process in the animating and constructing of the global political system, they were also
evolution of world politics: By going through instabilities and addressing it again to gain
knowledge of what is practical, world powers eventually built upon this small bulk of
democracy and with it, is the ability of that particular regime to adjust to modern times
its pure form used by a large portion of the world. Thus, in the case of our historic world
Modelski (2002) also emphasized that the process of evolution of the Global
political system was the key to the mechanism that activates innovation, cooperation,
and selection of global policies. And in turn, these long cycles of integration and
disintegration of world powers, and the growing and diversifying political philosophies
gave way to the building of new global political structures and thus effectuates global
political evolution (Modelski, 2002). This justifies the fact that along the way, as the
cycle goes on, we continue to grow: Every phase of instability opens up to new methods
of integration, this will be realized by the nation states thus furthering our realization to
cooperate and innovate new political policies to fit a new world order and finally, to gain
stability. Therefore, furthering our notion that the instability we face today may just be
necessary for us to learn our mistakes and build upon it a new order of stability with the
help of each and every state through the power of good international relations.
Day by day we witness and experience the various crises this world has to offer.
The prevalence of chaos seems too great to vanquish. Global instability is at its peak
(and may be not even), poverty, racism, religious and political wars are apparent. It may
seem like we are in the middle of an apocalyptic era but we may just be wrong. What
tolerance, and cooperation between nation states; maintaining also the theory of
Hegemonic Stability and Deterrence. But as this is a part of a cycle, our generation
should also do the part of devising a new political world structure that would best fit this
day and age. Thus, in the midst of our global political instability, we find lessons from
our mistakes our answers to bring back the stability we always yearned in our Global
Political System.
REFERENCES
Brzezinski, Z. (2004). The Choice: Global Leadership or Global Domination. New York, NY, USA: Basic
Books.
Parsi, V. (2003). Global Political System: From One to Many? Irish Studies in International Affairs, 14,
205-219.