Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
C OOT-DTD-R-9 2-2
Ahmad Ardani
Colorado Department of Transportation
4201 East Arkansas Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80222
Final Report
March, 1992
regulation.
i
I. R.,." Ne. 2. C ,,,.e"' A.cc i .., H. 3. R.el, i .... II C:stal., Ha.
CDOT-DTD-R-92-2
U. s..."I...,.~t., M.,
Prepared in cooperation with the U. S. Department of Transportation,
Federal Highway Administration
I'. AIt.',a.' This report reviews and summarizes the effectiv.ene&& of past expansive
soils treatmemt methods used by COlorado DOT and other '"ransportation agencies.
Among the trel'.t ,':!ent methods evaluated were the following:
- Sub-excavation and removal of expansiva soils anC' replacement . 'ith non-expansive
soil.
- Application of heavy applied load to balance the swelling pressure
--Preventing access of water to the soil by encapsulation
Stabilization by means of chemical admixtures
- Mechanical stabilization
- Explosive treatment to correct swelling shales
--Pre-wetting the soil
Avoiding the expansive soil
A survey ~estionnaire was designed and sent to the District Msterial& Bngineers to
obtain their consensus on the treatment techniques used in Colorado. The results of
this survey are presented in Part VIII of the report.
IMPLE:'i/i:"TATION: The results of this study showed that the performance of some of the
swelling soil treatment m~thods used in COlorado have been poor. As a result,
initiation of the second phase of this is recommended. The ultimate goal of the
second phase will be to establish up-to-date design guidelines that offer specific
strategies for highway construction on swelling soils and swelling Shales in
COlorado.
17. K.., w., ... II. 0 "' ......... 5......'
19. Slew .. " Cl ...if. (.1 !hi. ,...." 20. S.a.,lty Cl ...iI. (.1 ,hi .....) 21. H.. f ,., 22.. Price
pnclassified Unclassified 17
Fonn DOT F 1700.7 (1_721 R., .. cI"cti .... f c pl.t.d Pot- ."th.tis'"
Table of contents
Final Report
January 1992
1
LEGEND
ruJlO 1-41011: HI~LY IEKPANSI~ ANO/OR "IGH
FREQUENCV 0'- t'Of'".CtIRRHCr
~ MEOlutA MOQE:AATLV'!::,I(PA,.SIV
ANDfOR ...-oOAATE FREQUENCY OF
OCCURRENCE
~ LO., GENERALLY OF 1..0" EICPANStvE
CHARACTER ANOIOR 1..0" FAIEOUENCY OF
OCCURRENCE
CJ PlOfU:)lPANo;lV(: nu: OCCURAf:NCE 0'-
f:JC""''''''VI'I,IAHA'AL\[IIT''F.IotlLT
LIM'IH:.IJ
......- CA'EGORY 9C'UNOARY
.&..&..J. 50UTHERN LIM" OF" CONTI"!!:NTAL
GLACIATION
~
e#lSf"O Uf>()N THE PRE'5I!NCE OF MON,UORILLONITr.
"Nfl THE RELATIVE ,,"REQUIENCY OF OCCURRENCE
OF ARGILLACEOUS MAo TRI..,1.. IN THE AAIE ... . MAJOR
CAo TEGORllA TlONS ARf:: .,ASEO UPON ,TRATIGAAPHY
AND Pt-IY$IOGFlAPHV. OSCAIPT'ON' 0'- THE ""[DOM.
INANT GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS "AlE Glvl!.N IN ,A,8t..1f: J.
THI!: 8ASlS "OA THE C"EGO'UZ.lHlo..lS I!XPLAI~ED
-N- IN PARAGRAPH "5 OF THE T[XT,
'"dllldl. s..,
M.a, c..,ilrd by D P~rrit .. , " . . Woem, "
.s.
[nlillu.Htt tealorr n Roc" MetNnics (bistoll, U. S. . . ,
d
E,....., llteIwtrS Ea,eri...t SI.UOII. '1"lsIMa.
10"
,. ~
'. --
Figure 1. Distribution of potentially expansive materials in the United states; FHWA Regions 7 and 8
Perhaps the two most important factors in treating expansive
soils are: identifying and estimating the anticipated potential
volume change of the subgrade soils. There are numerous
techniques and methods used by agencies, such as highway
departments, transportation departments, Army Corps of Engineers,
and others, to identify and to estimate the magnitude of volume
change of expansive soils. The following is a brief description
of methods used to identify and to estimate the magnitude of
volume change of expansive soils.
Mineralogical Identification:
Microscopic examination
X-ray diffraction
Differential thermal analysis
Infrared analysis
Dye adsorption analysis
Chemical analysis
Physical properties:
3
mechanical apparatus
4
replacement with non-expansive soil
Application of heavy applied load to balance the s welling
pressure
Preventing access of .water to the soil by encapsulation
stabilization by means of chemical admixtures
Mechanical stabilization
Explosive treatment to correct swelling shales
Pre-wetting the soil
Avoiding the expansive soil
V Objective
5
VI Mechanics of Expansive Soils
6
western Colorado are made of Mancos shales . Most of the
eastern plains are underlain by Pierre shales.
A. Treatment Methods:
7
swelling (silts, clayey silts, silty clays, or some clays) .
Backfill material, particularly remolded in situ soil, should be
replaced and compacted with careful moisture and density control
(AASHTO T-99).
8
control sections . Moisture readings taken showed soil moisture
directly under the asphalt membrane to be quite uniform and
holding at optimum, while in the control section it was seven to
eight percent higher than the optimum.
9
Geologist of the Colorado DOT (Bob Barret), the cost of treating
swelling shales using low-level explosive was one-fifth the
estimated cost of sUb-excavation and recompaction (9). Blasting
as a treatment technique for swelling shales, requires careful
drill patterns and precise charges. The characteristics of each
site should be investigated to determine the optimum hole spacing
and explosive charge to obtain adequate fracturing of the shale.
10
FIGURE 1
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
-
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
WESTBOUND LANES
o o o o 0 o o o o o o o o o o
13
than as water alone (2) . According to A. G. Peterson (District I
Materials Engineer) , the success of lime shaft treatment has been
poor in District I. He believes the lime can not be dispersed
enough.
Many projects have been stabilized by mixing the soil and lime
(1% to 5% hydrated lime) to depths varying from 1 foot to 3 feet
with varying degree of success. Lime till stabilization will
effectively seal and reduce the swelling potential if adequately
mixed with the soil to a proper depth.
pre-wetting of Soil
14
season when the natural cracks and fissures are open due to
desiccation (1) .
15
B. Expansive Soils Survey:
16
Caryl . However, the same treatment has caused swell-related
distress occurring on Morrison Road, east and west of C-470,
and on mainline C-470 north of Morrison Road.
17
lime slurry. No swelling distress has been detected on this
embankment and the cut sections to date, and it appears that
the treatment is working well .
18
District III.
Lime shafts
Lime treated subgrade
Catalytically blown asphalt membranes
Replacement with higher quality material
Sub-excavation and recompaction with
moisture/density control (AASHTO T-99).
19
VIII Conclusions and Recommendations
20
Lime shaft stabilization has not been p roven successful because
the lime is only slightly soluble in water and, as a result,
cannot be dispersed enough.
21
IX Implementation
The ultimate goal of the second phase will be to over haul the
existing guidelines and establish up-to-date design guidelines
for highway construction on swelling soils and swelling shales in
Colorado.
22
X Rererences
23
9. Ruckman, A. C. and Barrett, R. K., " Swelling Shales and
collapsing soils", Transportation Research Record 790.
January 1981.
24
Appe ndix A
Drn Merro #323
1/5/66
( WlSTRUCITON)
Swelling Soils
DEPAR1MENT OF HIG-lHAYS
STATE OF O1LORAlXl
4201 East Arkansa~ Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80222
For a number of years the DepartmEnt has bee,n studying the problem of
swelling soils. To date we do not have the complete answer to this problem.
Hcwever, sufficient research werle has been performed that we feel the follCJI.I-
ing Ir.ethod of control of swelling soils should be used by the Departrrent until
more infonnation is available.
Pavement distortion from swell has been found only on e>qlansive soils
and was rrost prevalent on soils of the A-6 and A- 7 groups and on borderline
soils between the A-4 and the A-6 and A-7 groups. Also, certain A-2-6 and
A-2-7 soils which are borderline with the A-6 and A-7 eroups have produced
sorre ~.ell.
10 - 20 2 feet
20 - 30 3 feet
30 - 40 II feet
40 - SO " 5 feet
over SO 6 feet
10 - 30 2 feet
30 - SO 3 feet ;
over 50 4 feet J....
I,
I
!;
J
Appendix B
.--
~
C. BO/ER
Deputy Chief Engineer
TCR:ntw
Distribution
Districts 1 to ~; incl. - 50 Staff Materials Engineer - 10
District5-t {. - 25 Staff Construction Engineer - 10
Mr. Shumate - 1 Planning' and Research - 5
I'll'. Bower - 1 Staff Design - 27
Mr. l"erten - 1 \~ayne Capron - .10
l-lr. Zulian - 1 R, B. tudley - 20
Office Servic;es - 2 Stock - SO
.' " . . . 1(' 1lPR.- . - '. 5-'.
Appe ndix C
30
August 16, 1978
Sub grade stabilization between stations 409+63 and 419+85 EB and 410+12 and
420+20 WB is required on this project.
No more than 2 adjacent lines in either direction will be detonated at one time.
A minimum of 25 Milliseconds delay must be used between subsequent detonations.
Detonation will be coordinated with other activities and with the approval
o~ the Engineer.
All traffic will be stopped during the blasting operation and will not be
allowed to proceed until it has been determined as safe to do so.
Basis of Payment:
Payment for this item shall be based on the accepted quantities at the
contract price per lineal foot of drill hole for "Drilling and Blasting."
This will be full compensation for this item and include all work necessary
to complete this item.
TYPICAL SECTION
<!D- 8". Rr"itc.~ TA,_ M.E\(
. 'J
"~
,
, ';" : . l
.,: "'1' ..' .
"
_~ F. ~::... .
~'T:T"T
~1;;;!il!J77)l!!h"m,~jV'i""'h"hffl,tl"~
:: r:f"T"-,
PrlletllGra.mdUII.
'
'*' lR 7D"(5n.
'T::=V
Thil Pr_jee' WillS. Co1lb,_dWifhFhjecl F'-I 5tr/pi4g will b. dccOMpli.v.cd by SI'4te ~_ . ..
-Ji=:~71=,
TempcvoJ'J Sf-,ip;"', wiD be done on Project" JR 7G-I(5Z
e 7hcPr~.n' "' ",c~I W,1I8.R.mov.d~ Ret~I"d Und.rPrqj.ctNtl
IR lO-ItS?) C5ce The 5po'1C"PrIWI~jOIl5~ Detai~ ForNJtJili(lnQ/
."Q
wd/ DC dCCO'TIplillled by S"al'~ For.t:cs.
~:i":;I~:'~i: ~
. r:7 -- - .'-~-,-_
1I ,"'.~r-----'-
ItlfwtnoIiOll.'
7he Cul/racb WlIIS,R.quirildToP1cx~mbollhmen,,,,,.,iol Ta .. _,L __ ., 1
~(T. : i . "!:.~'-~:..: '. _...1'::" :.' J
.
I I , -, ~ , - I
I1 c.. ' I ' ,I T/'Ij,Lm, TIlcCmUl/lJl_lIfUa/";~F'or5JoplFIg"""mgWUlS.
r~!
t Otl"lIn-.dF'(lnTIWt.a~C/IC"""'
. ion4rfG~GledApPI'm':-"!r
. ,....
,~
I
ICO'UfII><I/U Qf .s,.. ~a1.50
,
,, -
,
,II "', .... 171
V
'
,
I I The G ...rd .q,,",PosT.s.C~'(Te PIP& CfItI5eefiMs ;I4Je1'&4#Ift
t ......-1 ,-_ .. rnl" I':~ 'RIBe Rrmo ..,d ~JIBe ~"'porlJ,;I,.5~ckpJlcd rg,
'P,c~UP- B,~dT~ ..... IJJnT~nt:t: Ar.sr>NI,l.
J: r-'-1: "u-, I
1:-
I . (Jrzb;"_for ~lt;k--J ...".rA:er... ..M'.J.oa,.,&rr4.r,o'if1CMg IYQBe
"jfR::~~~JJ'Jd$:''1'7~{}~:.uwnf.McJr 5ta 361<00 ~ arlie;"
",~, ...-, .. I.-
',"{r -' '._-1 -
~ I ~lIn9J CAntoc, 11'11 MI,"IIt,n,"'1CC Tru(fic fkpr,.enlaliwt40rIDUTI11I
I!
I I
!
I
L_Jl :..J ... nuOf .V/l~n Tni. w.v.1J TDB .. 4>n.
It 'seJ/,m~/ed MJI ~oo HOUII (1/
"'i"ifed on ,'''", PIOJ,ct
FI""iIlV wI/I b,
iX'':il}a'J.;m-.(
-t--j
5h"/e 01' fod froJ9m.nh 9"./e, III .7;'e lAM ~. ,..WI;"., Fit I' ... C....
'HIIIIClI" lutll' 110."
I~~L
,",t."'~ II'H J.,e,. t:~/.mdl.~ f", drlll'~ #ltd /,1,,,/1119
1.. ,l _____ i 11 ____ "'
d/elfDIt 'he 6' 1,' "ft:lP,.Jylll~ (J.(JI If O.t "",..:" 10 t:I
plh of ~ r,.
""d wtll be 1'0,,/ to, on III .ellI"!
9 .... nhl'e. ~,.p',.d. TIn" ,n/cn' II"". ; . ,. obi.,,,. d '
I' , r,l)
,.1 . '(1)
I~ n.,
II' . . . '
. ...
n '
' '
mu~1I p.,,,.Ir.,ht,,, G;t p."".fJ/e J/u"v(1h Ill. ,Jubb.,u
'Ju.. el ,",,/0 Ih., dri ll holu G"d J".,I. D.,IQw. Til" will ,. n, U' .U'
'. II'" .... II , .....,.
'"'1.''''' ,J<:o'cl.'apphc.J,onl 0/ tIIalc, "I ,II/ferm.""d ,. n, u.
~ "._.... la __ 1
',lb. C"i,It.u. II 11 UII"'''" ....... l.t.
U'
JJ
QUESTIONNAIRE 76.96
1. Has your district dealt with swelling soil during the past
two decades? YES NO If the answer is yes, please
try to answer the following question to the best of your
knowledge.
2. What is the magnitude of swelling problems in your
district? ____HIGH ____MEDIUM ____LOW
PROJEcr LOCATION:
MEI'HOD OF TREA'IMENT: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
~ ~rITONS: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
PERFORMANCE: 1. Excellent
2. Good
3. Average
4. Poor
5. Very Poor