2016.05.31 Gmef Tool Kit

A HANDBOOK ON THE APPLICATION OF THE ENHANCED A TOOLKIT ON THE ENHANCED GENDER MAINSTREAMING EVALUATION FRAMEWORK
GENDER MAINSTREAMING EVALUATION FRAMEWORK

Acronyms
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Gender Mainstreaming in the Context of Implementing the Magna Carta of Women GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - POLICY
The WID, WAD & GAD Approach
GAD Mainstreaming as a National Strategy
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - PEOPLE
Chapter 3: Enhancing the Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework
Historical Background
Enhanced GMEF
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING MECHANISMS
Entry Points of Gender Mainstreaming
Levels of Gender Mainstreaming
GMEF Descriptor Matrix
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES/PROJECTS
Chapter 4: Guide for Administering the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework
Accomplishing the Individual Organizational Assessment Questionnaires
Analyzing the Results of Administering the Enhanced GMEF
Possible Means of Verification per Descriptor GMEF - SCORESHEET
Glossary of Terms
References
http://www.pcw.gov.ph/
Fax Number: +632.7364449
Telephone: +632.7365249 / +632.7367712 / 632.7351654
1145 J.P. Laurel St., San Miguel Manila, 1005 Philippines
PHILIPPINE COMMISSION ON WOMEN
Office of the President
. Toolkit
. Handbook
F RAMEWORK
E VALUATION
M AINSTREAMING
G ENDER
ENHANCED GENDER MAINSTREAMING EVALUATION FRAMEWORK

GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL
ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE-
POLICY
The Policy questionnaire consists of 13 descriptors that track the progress of an
organizations efforts in integrating GAD in its plans and policy issuances.
At the Foundation Formation level, organizations issue policies supporting the

elements of GAD Planning and Budgeting, review existing policies to ensure
consistency with new GAD issuances, and issue documents to support attendance to
PCW-led GAD-related events.
At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, organizations progress to the

issuance of policies to address gender issues using gender-fair language and images
among its internal and external clients.
At the GAD Application level, a GAD agenda or strategic framework is already

adopted and implemented to ensure that GAD is being integrated in the organizations
major programs and projects.
At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the plans and

policies of the organization have already resulted in positive impacts.
At the Replication and Innovation level, these plans and policies are continually
enhanced and used as standards by other organizations in developing their own
gender-sensitive policies and plans.
A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework

Copyright 2016 - Philippine Commission on Women
1145 J.P. Laurel St., San Miguel Manila 1005 Philippines
Telephone: +632.7365249 or +632.7367712
Fax Number: +632.7364449
GUIDE FOR ANSWERING THE GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL
ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRES
1. Each item is marked with specific scores representing (1) YES; (2) PARTLY YES;
and (3) NO. Indicate a score in the appropriate column to signify the degree to
which your organization has complied with the GAD element required.
2. Under the MOV/Remarks column, indicate/attach the means of verification required
or provide an explanation in support of your response. Failure to provide the
appropriate MOVs could disregard/invalidate the partly yes or fully yes scores
of the organization.
3. Transfer all the scores per questionnaire to the GMEF Score Sheet.
GMEF SCORESHEET
Name of the Organization Assessed: ________________________________
Date Administered: _______________________________________________
Inclusive Period of Assessment: ____________________________________
Key Areas Score

Policy
1. Issuance of initial policies on GAD
2. Issuance of policies to mainstream GAD in the organization
3. Integration of GAD in the Organizations Policies
4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies
5. Model GAD Policy
Sub-Total:
Level for Policy:
People
1. On Establishing GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates
2. On GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities
3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs
4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers
5. GAD Experts
Sub-Total:
2 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy

4. To get the total score per entry point, add the sub-total scores per questionnaire
and refer to the following legend of scores to determine the organizations level of
GAD mainstreaming efforts:
RANGES LEVEL DESCRIPTION
0-7.99 points 1: Foundation Formation
8-14.99 points 2: Installation of Strategic
Level Mechanisms
Per Entry
Point 15-19.99 points 3: GAD Application
20-23.99 points 4: Commitment Enhancement and
Institutionalization
24-25 points 5: Replication and Innovation
5. To get the overall level of the GAD mainstreaming efforts of the organization, add
all the scores per entry point and refer to the following legend of scores to interpret
the ratings:
Over-all Mechanisms
Level 61-80.99 points 3: GAD Application
6. Organizations should take note of questions/descriptors with NO and PARTLY

YES responses and design programs or undertake activities to improve their score.
7. The organization may re-administer the GMEF Organizational Assessment
Questionnaires after a specified period of time (e.g. every 3 years) to keep track of
its GAD mainstreaming efforts.
GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy 3

4
POLICY ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
DESCRIPTORS SCORE Score per Means of Verification/Remarks

NO PARTLY YES item
1. Issuance of Foundational Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
1.1 Has the No policy/policies Policy/policies Policy/policies Enumerate the GAD related policies issued
organization issued articulating support articulating support articulating support to (e.g., policy on setting up GFPS or GAD Office;
policies articulating to GAD mandates to GAD mandates GAD mandates and collection and maintenance of sex-disaggregated
support to GAD and establishing and establishing establishing all four database; conduct of organization-wide gender
essential elements at least one (1) essential elements
mandates and audit; capacity-building plan for GFPS and HR of
of GAD planning and essential element of of GAD planning and
establishing the budgeting issued GAD planning and budgeting issued
organization).
essential elements of budgeting issued
GAD Planning and Policy Title Purpose/ Date Issued
Budgeting? (possible Subject
GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy

scores are 0, 0.83 and Matter
1.67)
1.2 Has the No policy reviewed Some existing policies Some existing policies Enumerate policies reviewed and/or re-issued/
organization conducted reviewed but no new reviewed, revised and revised for consistency with new GAD issuances
a review of existing policies re-issued and/ re-issued (e.g. policy reconstituting the GAD Focal Point
policies for consistency or revised System based on MC 2011-01, etc.).
with emerging GAD
issues? (possible Title Type Purpose/ Date
scores are 0, 0.83 and Subject Issued
1.67) Matter
1.3 Has the No broad statement 1-2 broad statements 3 or more broad Enumerate broad statements issued in
organization issued supporting GAD- supporting GAD- statements supporting support of GAD related activities/issues (e.g.,
broad statements related activities related activities GAD-related activities memorandum for the organization to participate
of intentions or issued issued issued in Womens Month activities, 18-day Campaign
aspirations reflecting on VAW, etc).
its support for GAD-
related activities? Title Type Purpose/ Date
(possible scores are 0, Subject Issued
0.83 and 1.67) Matter
Sub-total GMEF Score

(Level 1 Policy)
2. Issuance of Policies to mainstream GAD in the Organization (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
2.1 Has the No policy reflecting 1-2 policies reflecting 3 or more policies List all policies issued by the organization related
organization issued the organizations the organizations reflecting the to gender mainstreaming (e.g. issuance of
policies reflecting its interest for gender interest for gender organizations DOH department order to integrate GAD in all
interest for gender mainstreaming issued mainstreaming issued interest for gender programs):
mainstreaming issued
mainstreaming?
(possible scores are 0, Title Type Purpose/ Date
0.83 and 1.67) Subject Issued
Matter

5
6
2.2 Has the No policy reflecting 1-2 policies reflecting 3 or more policies Enumerate all policies issued addressing gender
organization issued gender needs gender needs of reflecting gender needs of internal and external clients of the
policies addressing the of internal and/or internal and/or external needs of internal and/ organization (e.g. issuance of policy for the
gender needs of the external clients issued clients issued or external clients establishment of a child-minding center for use
issued
clients (internal and of employees and clients with small children)
external)? (possible
scores are 0, 0.83 and Title Type Purpose/ Date
1.67) Subject Issued
Matter
2.3 Has the Gender-fair language Gender-fair language Gender-fair language Attach sample policy of the organization directing
organization used and images not and images used in and images used in all the use of gender-fair language and polices as
gender-fair language yet used in policy some policy issuances policy issuances well as policies of the organization that used
issuances

and images in its policy gender-fair language and images.
issuances? (possible
scores are 0, 0.83 and
1.67)
(Level 2 Policy)
3. Integration of GAD in the Organizations Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
3.1 Has the No GAD Agenda/ GAD Agenda/Strategic GAD Agenda/Strategic Attach a copy of the GAD Agenda/ Strategic
organization adopted a Strategic Framework Framework formulated Framework formulated Framework of the organization (or GAD Code, if
GAD Agenda/Strategic formulated but not adopted by and adopted by LGU)
Framework? (possible management management
1.67)
3.2 Has the GAD perspective GAD perspective GAD perspective Enumerate the organizational and/or national/
organization integrated not yet integrated in integrated in integrated in all areas sectoral plan/s in which GAD has been
GAD perspective in organizational and/ selected areas of the of the organizational integrated (e.g. Philippine Development Plan,
its organizational and/ or national/ sectoral organizational and/ and/or national/ Annual Budget Call or Gender-Responsive LGU
plan/s or national/sectoral sectoral plan/s
or national/sectoral Plans such as Comprehensive Development
plan/s
plan/s? (possible scores Plan for LGU) Organizational Plans (e.g., Work
are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) Plan, Capacity Development Plan, Procurement
Plan; Sectoral Plan i.e. Youth Plan, Disaster
Plan, Disability Plan etc.)
Title Type Date Issued
3.3 Has the No organizational/ 1-2 organizational/ 3 or more Provide complete title of sector specific GAD
organization formulated national/sectoral national/ sectoral organizational/ policies issued (e.g. Agency provision in the
organizational/national/ policies on GAD policies on GAD national/sectoral MCW i.e. CSC-Special Leave for Women, DFA-
sectoral policies on issued issued policies on GAD establishment of Gender Focal Point Officer in
issued
GAD? (possible scores Philippine Embassies and Consulates, GAD
are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) Code, RH Code and NAP WPS) and attach
copies if available.
Title Type Purpose/ Date

Subject Issued
Matter

(Level 3 Policy)

7
8
4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
4.1 Has the No gender gaps Gender gaps of either Gender gaps of either List down existing GAD policies of the
organizations GAD addressed by GAD internal and/or external internal and/or external organization and how it bridged gender gaps of
policy/policies resulted policy/policies clients are addressed clients are addressed its internal and/or external clients (e.g. lowering
in bridging gender gaps by 1-2 GAD policies by 3 or more GAD and responding to the cases Violence against
policies
of its clients (internal Women
and external)? (possible
scores are 0, 0.83 and Title of GAD Intended Gender Gaps
1.67) Policy Issued Client/ Addressed
Beneficiaries

Attach a copy of the policy assessment or
Gender Impact Assessment conducted by the
organization, if applicable.
4.2 Has the Results of gender Results of gender Results of gender Enumerate enhanced policies, guidelines and/
organization used analysis was not used analysis used in the analysis used in the or documents enhanced based on the results of
the results of gender in the development development and/or development and/or gender analysis.
analysis in the and/or enhancement enhancement of 1-2 enhancement of 3 or
of policies policies more policies
development and/ Policy/ Gender Remarks
or enhancement of Guidelines Analysis Tools
policies? (possible and/or Used
scores are 0, 0.83, and Documents
1.67) Enhanced
4.3 Has the GAD perspective not GAD perspective GAD perspective Identify where GAD perspective is integrated in
organization integrated yet integrated in the integrated in either integrated in the the Vision, Mission and/or Goals (VMG) of the
GAD perspective in Vision, Mission or the Vision, Mission or Vision, Mission and organization.
its Vision, Mission and Goals Goals Goals
Goals? (possible scores
are 0, 0.83, and 1.67)
(Level 4 Policy)
5. Model GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 5)
5.1 Has the Other organizations 1-2 organization/s 3 or more List down existing GAD policies used as a model
organizations GAD have not used the have used the organizations or replicated by other organizations (e.g., GAD
policies been used organizations policy/ organizations policy/ have used the Agenda or Strategic Framework for NGAs; Policy
as model/standard by policies as model or policies as model/ organizations policy/ creating a Provincial GAD Office or GAD Code
standard standard policies as model/
other organizations? for LGUs)
standard
(possible scores are 0,
2.5 and 5) GAD Policy Organization/ Remarks
Agency
Adopting/
Replicating the
Policy

(Level 5 Policy)
TOTAL GMEF SCORE

(Policy)

9
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL
PEOPLE
The People questionnaire consists of 27 questions that assess the progress of an
organizations efforts in ensuring that its people, whether top management, GAD Focal
Point System (GFPS) members or employees are gender-responsive and supportive of the
organizations gender mainstreaming efforts.
At the Foundation Formation level, the organization designates key people to be part
of its GFPS and ensures that the appropriate capacity development sessions on GAD
are provided to its top management, GFPS and staff members;
At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, the organization moves from the
conduct of GAD orientation sessions towards ensuring that its program implementers
are trained to do gender analysis, and clients are given opportunities to articulate their
gender issues as per direction of its top management;
During the GAD Application level, top management GFPS members and program
implementers are consciously integrating GAD in the organizations regular operations.
At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the organizations

GFPS members are already tapped as GAD resource person within the organization
and are able to develop GAD-related tools, customized to the mandate of the
organization; and
At the Replication and Innovation level, the people of the organization are
already recognized and tapped as GAD experts by other organizations, while its top
management is able to raise GAD concerns during high level meetings/discussions.

Telephone: +632.7365249 or +632.7367712
Fax Number: +632.7364449
GMEF SCORESHEET
Key Areas Score

Policy
5. Model GAD Policy
Sub-Total:
Level for Policy:
People
5. GAD Experts
Sub-Total:
2 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

Level Mechanisms
Per Entry
the ratings:
Over-all Mechanisms

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People 3

4
PEOPLE ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

NO PARTLY YES item
1. On the Establishment of GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates (max score: 5; for each item or question, .083)
1.1 Has the The organization Some members of Majority of the If yes, provide details on the policy formalizing
organization designated has yet to identify the GFPS occupy members of the the creation/reconstitution of the organizations
people in strategic key people to be strategic positions in GFPS occupy GAD Focal Point System (GFPS) and attach a
positions as members members of its the organization strategic positions in copy for validation.
of its GAD Focal Point GFPS the organization
System (GFPS)? If no, explain why the organization has not
(possible scores are 0, designated people in strategic positions as
0.41, and 0.83) members of its GAD Focal Point System
(GFPS)?
GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

______________________________________
______________________________
*Majority is defined at least 50%+ 1 of all GFPS members
as per SO, AO, DAO or policy creating/reconstituting the
GAD Focal Point System of the organization
1.2 Have the GFPS members GFPS members GFPS members List down basic GAD training attended by GAD
organizations GAD have not attended attended 1-2 basic attended all three Focal Point System members (e.g. Gender
Focal Point System any of the basic GAD training basic GAD training Sensitivity Training (GST), Gender Analysis
(GFPS) members GAD training (GA) and GA Tools and GAD Planning and
attended appropriate Budgeting).
and relevant training on
GAD? (possible scores Title of Number of Trainer/ Date
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) GAD Participants Institutional
Training Provider
1.3 Has the Top management Only selected All top management List down top management official/s who
organizations top has not yet members of the officials have attended Basic GAD Orientation/Gender
management attended attended Basic GAD top management attended Basic GAD Sensitivity Training (GST)
Basic GAD Orientation Orientation or GST attended Basic GAD Orientation or GST
or Gender Sensitivity Orientation or GST Name of Top Basic GAD Institutional/ Date
Training (GST)? Management Orientation/ Training
Official GST Provider
Attended
0.41, and 0.83)
1.4 Have the Less than 50% of 50-99% of the 100% of the Attach attendance sheets of all Basic GAD
organizations staff the organizations organizations staff organizations staff Orientations or Gender Sensitivity Training (GST)
members been oriented staff members have members have members have conducted/attended by the organizations staff
on GAD? (possible attended Basic GAD attended Basic GAD attended Basic GAD members.
scores are 0, 0.41, and Orientation or GST Orientation or GST Orientation or GST
0.83)
1.5 Are the Top management Some GFPS Some top If yes, explain how the top management and
organizations top and GFPS members members are aware management and GFPS members manifest awareness and
management and GAD are not yet aware and conscious of all GFPS members consciousness of GAD-related policies and
Focal Point System and conscious of GAD-related policies are aware and mandates (e.g. top management approves and
(GFPS) members GAD-related policies and mandates conscious of GAD- directs implementation of GPBs, attends GAD-
aware and conscious and mandates related policies and related activities, allows staff to participate in
of GAD-related policies mandates GAD-related activities, supports appointment of
and mandates? qualified women to management positions, etc.)
0.41, and 0.83) ______________________________
______________________________
______________________________

5
6
1.6 Does the Top management Top management Top management Attach copies of policies issued by top
organizations top does not allow allows only the allows all key management allowing staff members to
management allow staff staff members to GFPS members to officials, GFPS participate in GAD-related activities (e.g. office
members to participate participate in GAD- participate in GAD- members and orders, travel orders, department orders,
in GAD-related related activities related activities staff members to executive orders, admin memos, etc.) or
activities? (possible participate in GAD- accomplish the table below:
scores are 0, 0.41, and related activities
0.83) GAD- Participants Organizer Date
related
Activity

(Level 1 People)

2. GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities (max score: 5; for each item: 0.83)
2.1 Does the top Top management Top management Top management Cite critical incidents of top management
management direct does not direct GPB approves GPB but approves GPB and directing the implementation of the organizations
the implementation implementation not visible during attends critical / GPB (e.g. presence or participation during the
of the GAD Plan and critical/significant significant GAD setting of GAD agenda, strategic planning on
Budget (GPB) of the GAD activities activities GAD, etc.)
organization? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and Attach relevant documents indicating support
0.83) of top management to the implementation of
the GAD Plan and Budget of the organization
(e.g. attendance sheet, copy of Opening/Closing
Remarks during GAD training, photos taken
during GAD training, etc.)
2.2 Are program Program Only selected All program Enumerate training on Gender Analysis (GA) and
implementers trained on implementers not yet program implementers are Gender Analysis (GA) Tools attended by program
gender analysis (GA) trained on GA and implementers are trained on GA and implementers.
and the use of gender use of GA tools trained on GA and use of GA tools
analysis (GA) tools? use of GA tools Title of GA Participants Trainer/ Date
(possible scores are 0, Training Provider
0.41, and 0.83)
Attach training design and attendance sheets of

Gender Analysis and GA Tools training attended
by program implementers.
2.3 Are concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff List down trainings conducted for concerned staff
members trained in the members are not members are trained members are trained members on the importance of collecting sex-
importance of collecting yet trained in the in the importance of in the importance of disaggregated data and gender statistics.
sex-disaggregated importance of collecting SDD and collecting SDD and
data (SDD) and gender collecting SDD and gender statistics gender statistics, Title of Training Participants Date
statistics? (possible gender statistics and are collecting Conducted
scores are 0, 0.41, and them
0.83)
2.4 Are male Male employees do Male employees Male employees Provide list of the organizations PAPs initiated
employees involved not participate in the participate in the initiate and and/or participated by male employees:
and appreciative of the organizations GAD organizations GAD participate in the
organizations GAD PAPs PAPs organizations GAD GAD PAPs Type of Participants
PAPs? (possible scores PAPs Involvement
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) of Male
Employees
*Type of Involvement of Male Employees: as participants,

organizers and/or resource persons in the conduct of the
organizations GAD efforts.

7
8
2.5 Are clients (internal Clients are not yet Either internal or Both internal and If yes, identify efforts to orient clients on the GAD
and external) aware of oriented on the external clients are external clients are efforts of the organization (e.g. PCW website,
the GAD efforts of the GAD efforts of the oriented on the oriented on the news, GAD corner in the organization, social
organization? (possible organization GAD efforts of the GAD efforts of the media (FB, Twitter), among others.
scores are 0, 0.41, and organization organization
0.83) Activity Targeted Date
Audience Conducted
Also attach results of assessments or surveys

conducted to measure awareness of clients
(internal and external) on the GAD efforts of the
organization, if applicable.

2.6 Are the clients Clients (internal and Either internal or Both internal and Attach documentation of consultations/
(internal and external) external) are not external clients are external clients are meetings (e.g. survey, focus group discussions,
able to articulate their able to articulate able to articulate able to articulate key informant interviews) and list of issues
gender needs/issues gender needs/issues gender issues/needs gender issues/needs raised by clients (internal and external) during
in the development of in the development in the development in the development consultations, etc.
the organizations GAD of the organizations of the organizations of the organizations
PAPs? (possible scores GAD PAPs GAD PAPs GAD PAPs
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83)

(Level 2 People)
3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs (max score: 5; for each item: .83)
3.1 Does the top No initial discussion With initial Top management Attach directive/s issued by top management to
management direct among top discussion among issued directive/s integrate GAD perspective in the organizations
the integration of management top management to integrate GAD program/activities/projects (PAPs) and
GAD perspective in officials on the officials regarding perspective in the performance indicators.
the organizations integration of GAD integration of GAD organizations PAPs
programs/activities/ perspective in the perspective in the and performance
projects (PAPs) and organizations PAPs organizations PAPs indicators
performance indicators? and performance and performance
(possible scores are 0, indicators indicators
0.41, and 0.83)
3.2 Are the GFPS GFPS members Either GFPS Both the GFPS Enumerate organization programs/activities/
members and program and program members members projects (PAPs) and performance indicators
implementers able implementers or program and program integrated with GAD perspective by GFPS
to integrate GAD are not yet able implementers are implementers are members and program implementers.
perspective in the to integrate GAD able to integrate able to integrate
development of perspective in the GAD perspective in GAD perspective in Responsible Type Purpose/ Date
the organizations development of the the development of the development of Unit Subject Issued
Matter
programs/activities/ organizations PAPs the organizations the organizations
projects (PAPs)? PAPs PAPs GFPS
(possible scores are 0, Program
0.41, and 0.83 Implementers

9
10
3.3 Are concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff If yes, explain how concerned staff members
members able to utilize members are not members utilize members utilize utilize sex-disaggregated data and/or gender
sex-disaggregated yet able to utilize SDD and/or gender SDD and/or gender statistics for gender analysis to enhance the
data (SDD) and/ SDD and/or gender statistics for GA statistics for GA organizations GAD PAPs.
or gender statistics statistics for GA and recommend
for gender analysis strategies to ______________________________
(GA) to enhance the enhance the ______________________________
organizations GAD organizations GAD
PAPs? (possible scores PAPs ______________________________
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83)
Type of SDD/ P/A/P where GAD Efforts
Gender SDD was Enhanced
Statistics Applied

3.4 Does the top Top management Top management Top management Attach documents issued by top management
management support does not appoint appoints women to appoints women to supporting the appointment of qualified women
the appointment of women to leadership leadership position leadership position staff members in leadership positions (e.g.
qualified women staff positions but provides limited and provides full department order or executive orders, list of
members to leadership support support training available, documentation of mentoring
positions? (possible activities, etc.).
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
3.5 Do women Women occupy less Women occupy less Women occupy 50% Identify the number of employees in the following
assume critical roles than 50% of the than 50% of third or more of the third positions:
and authority in the third level, middle level positions but level positions in the
organization? (possible management and comprise 50% or organization Position No. of Men No. of % of
scores are 0, 0.41, and technical positions in more of the middle Women Women
0.83) the organization management and Top
technical positions in Management
the organization Middle
Management
Technical Staff
3.6. Are the clients No client (internal Either internal or Both internal and If yes, describe how clients (internal or external)
(internal and external), and external) external clients external clients participate in the planning and implementation of
able to participate involvement in participate in the participate in the the organizations GAD PAPs.
in the planning and the planning and planning and planning and
implementation of the implementation of implementation of implementation of ______________________________
organizations GAD the organizations the organizations the organizations ______________________________
PAPs? (possible scores GAD PAPs GAD PAPs GAD PAPs
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) ______________________________
Attach documents showing external clients
membership in the technical working groups
(TWGs) and project management offices (TWGs)
as well as attendance sheets and documentation
of meetings participated by internal and external
clients.

(Level 3 People)
4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers (max score: 5; for each item: 0.83)
4.1 Are the GAD Focal GFPS members are Less than 50% of 50% or more of the Attach list and profile of the GFPS members
Point System (GFPS) not yet serving as the GFPS members GFPS members including the GAD-related training conducted.
members able to serve resource persons are serving as are serving as
as GAD resource on GAD within the GAD resource GAD resource Name of Title of GAD Name of Date
persons within the organization persons within the persons within the GFPS Activities Office/Unit, Conducted
Member Conducted Regional
organization, including organization organization Office and/
who served
its regional offices and as GAD or Attached
attached agencies? Resource Agency
(possible scores are 0, Person
0.41 and 0.83)

11
12
4.2 Does the top No initial discussion With initial Top management Attach copies of directive/s issued by top
management direct among top discussion among issued directive/s management regarding the monitoring of the
the monitoring of the management top management to monitor the organizations GAD PAPs as well as monitoring
organizations GAD officials on the officials on the organizations GAD reports, as applicable.
PAPs? (possible scores monitoring of the monitoring of the PAPs
are 0, 0.41 and 0.83) organizations GAD organizations GAD
PAPs PAPs
4.3 Are concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff List down GAD PAPs calibrated to address
members able to adjust members not able members able to members able to emerging gender issues.
GAD PAPs to address to adjust GAD PAPs identify emerging identify and adjust
emerging gender to address emerging gender issues but GAD PAPs to Title of Emerging Unit/
issues? (possible gender issues are not capable of address emerging Adjusted GAD Gender Issues Concerned
scores are 0, 0.41 and addressing them gender issues PAPs Addressed Staff
0.83) Responsible

4.4 Do top management GAD is not reflected GAD reflected in GAD reflected in Attach sample of Terms of Reference (TORs),
and concerned staff in the performance the performance the performance Performance Contract, Individual Performance
members reflect GAD contracts or contracts or TORs contracts or Commitment and Review (IPCR) forms of
functions in their TORs of both top of either top TORs of both top staff members and Career Executive Service
performance contracts management and management or management or Performance Evaluation System (CESPES) of
or terms of reference concerned staff concerned staff concerned staff top management officials of the organization
(TORs)? (possible members members members
0.83)
4.5 Are concerned Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff Please provide details of tools and/or knowledge
staff members able to members not yet members develop members develop products (KPs) on GAD developed.
develop tools and/or able to develop GAD GAD tools and GAD tools and KPs
knowledge products tools and KPs on KPs on GAD with on GAD on their own GAD Tools Purpose Name and
(KPs) on GAD? GAD assistance from and/or KPs Designation
(possible scores are 0, external GAD Developed of GAD
0.41 and 0.83) experts/resource experts
persons tapped for
assistance
4.6 Are clients (internal No participation from Either internal or Both internal and If yes, describe the participation of internal
and external) able clients in all levels external clients external clients and/or external clients in the development
to participate in 3 of the development have participated have participated planning cycle (planning, implementation and
or more levels of planning cycle of the in 1-2 levels of in all levels of management, monitoring and evaluation) of the
the development organizations GAD the development the development organizations GAD PAPs.
planning cycle of the PAPs planning cycle of the planning cycle of the
organizations GAD organizations GAD organizations GAD ______________________________
PAPs? (possible scores PAPs PAPs ______________________________
are 0, 0.41 and 0.83)
______________________________
(Level 4 People)

13
14
5. GAD Experts (max score: 5; for each item, 1.67)
5.1 Does the top Top management Top management is Top management Attach documentation of meetings and/or
management raise has not raised GAD able to raise GAD is able to raise and discussions where GAD concern/s was/were
GAD concerns during concerns during concerns during receive support on raised by the organizations top management.
high-level meetings/ high- level meetings high-level meetings GAD concerns from
discussions? (e.g. colleagues during Meeting/ GAD Name of Top Name of
Cabinet cluster high-level meetings Discussion Concerns Management Person who
Discussed/ who Raised Supported
meeting, international GAD
Raised the GAD
conferences) (possible Concern Concern
1.67)
5.2 Are the Staff members not Staff members Staff members Attach list and profile of internal GAD experts.

organizations staff yet tapped by other recognized as GAD recognized as
members recognized organizations experts and tapped GAD experts and Enumerate seminars/conferences/training
as GAD experts by by 1-4 organizations tapped by 5 or more facilitated by internal GAD experts for other
other organizations? organizations agencies and organizations.
0.83 and 1.67) Name of In- Title of GAD Name of Date
ternal GAD Activities Inviting Conducted
Expert Conducted Organizations
5.3 Are external clients External clients External clients External clients Awards/ Organization Date
of the organization not yet recognized received received awards Citations/ Conferring the Conferred
recognized as for their gender nominations or for their gender Nominations Award/Citation
GAD champions by mainstreaming have shortlisted mainstreaming
Received
reputable local, national efforts and/or cited in their efforts from
and international respective localities reputable local,
organizations? for their gender national and
(possible scores are 0, mainstreaming international
0.83 and 1.67) efforts by reputable organizations
local, national Attach copies of news articles, other write-ups
and international or documentation (e.g. TV interviews) regarding
organizations gender mainstreaming efforts of the external
clients of the organization, if applicable.

(Level 5 People)
TOTAL GMEF SCORE

(People)

15
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL
ENABLING MECHANISMS
The Enabling Mechanisms questionnaire consists of 23 questions that assess the
progress of an organizations efforts in ensuring that mechanisms to mainstream the GAD
perspective are established and fully functional.
At the Foundation Formation level, the organization has established or reconstituted

its GAD Focal Point System (GFPS) as a catalyst for gender mainstreaming. It is
also at this level where the organization has conducted exploratory engagements with
PCW and other GAD-related institutions and experts;
At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, other GAD mechanisms that will
address the needs of the organizations internal and external clients are established,
and there is a marked increase in the utilization of the GAD Budget.
At the GAD Application level, the organization judiciously utilizes more than the
minimum 5% GAD budget allocation while boasting of a fully functioning M&E System
and has set-up a Knowledge Management System.
At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the organizations

enabling mechanisms can now track desired gender-related impacts and are able to
produce GAD-related knowledge products; and
At the Replication and Innovation level, the enabling mechanisms are recognized
as models by other organizations and the whole budget of the organization is fully
gender-responsive.

Telephone: +632.7365249 or +632.7367712
Fax Number: +632.7364449
GMEF SCORESHEET
Key Areas Score

Policy
5. Model GAD Policy
Sub-Total:
Level for Policy:
People
5. GAD Experts
Sub-Total:
2 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Enabling Mechanisms

Level Mechanisms
Per Entry
the ratings:
Over-all Mechanisms

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Enabling Mechanisms 3

4
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING MECHANISMS

NO PARTLY YES item
1. Setting up of Essential GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
1.1 Has the GFPS not created/ GFPS or similar GFPS or similar Attach the directory of the newly-created/recon-
organization created/ reconstituted in GAD mechanism GAD mechanism stituted GFPS of the organization, including its
reconstituted its GAD accordance with created/ created/ regional and attached offices as applicable*
Focal Point System MCW IRR Sec reconstituted in the reconstituted in the
(GFPS) in accordance 37-C and pertinent central office and/ central office and all
with Magna Carta of policies issued by or selected regional regional offices and
Women Implementing concerned oversight and/or attached attached agencies
Rules and Regulations agencies agencies/offices only
(MCW IRR) Sec. 37-C
and other pertinent *Agencies with created/reconstituted GFPS or similar GAD
policies issued by mechanisms in accordance with mentioned pertinent guide-
lines with no regional and attached offices will be awarded
oversight agencies? 1.67 points equivalent to a yes answer
0.83, and 1.67)
GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Enabling Mechanisms

1.2 Has the No exploratory Organization Organization If yes, list down the exploratory activities initiated
organization initiated activities initiated at conducted initiated exploratory by the organization (e.g. meeting with PCW for
exploratory activities all initial meetings/ activity/activities with the identification of necessary capacity develop-
with the Philippine consultations with PCW, organizations ment activities for GFPS and staff members) to
Commission on PCW, organizations and/or individuals facilitate gender mainstreaming
Women (PCW) or and/or individuals to facilitate gender
other agencies/LGUs, to facilitate gender mainstreaming List of Exploratory Remarks
institutions and/or mainstreaming Organizations/ Activities
individuals to facilitate Individuals Conducted
gender mainstreaming?
0.83 and 1.67)
1.3 Has the No information Data and information Intake forms Attach intake forms such as attendance sheets,
organization collected collected collected but are not developed and profile forms, etc., with separate columns for
information towards the yet disaggregated used to collect sex- sex, used by the organization to gather sex-
establishment of sex- by sex disaggregated data disaggregated data. Include list of information
disaggregated database or gender statistics that can be disaggregated by sex (e.g. list of
and enhancement of its client beneficiaries, service providers, partners,
M&E system? (possible etc.)
scores are 0, 0.83, and
1.67)

(Level 1 Enabling Mechanisms)
2. Functional GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
2.1 Does the No functional GFPS performing GFPS members If GFPS is performing limited functions, explain
organization have a GFPS based on the limited functions actively performing the challenges faced by the GFPS of the
functional GAD Focal provisions of the based on the all the functions organization in mainstreaming GAD.
Point System based guidelines issued by provisions of the based on the
on the provisions of relevant oversight guidelines issued by provisions of _______________________________________
the guidelines issued agencies relevant oversight guidelines issued by _______________________________________
by relevant oversight agencies relevant oversight _______________________________________
agencies? (e.g. PCW agencies
MC 2011-01 for NGAs,
JMC 2013-01 for LGUs
and CHED MO 2015-
01 for SUCs) (possible
scores are 0, 0. 5 and
1)

5
6
2.2 Has the No other GAD 1 other GAD 2 or more other Enumerate other GAD mechanisms established
organization mechanism mechanism GAD mechanisms [e.g. Committee on Decorum and Investigation
established other GAD established established established (CODI), Violence against Women and their
mechanisms? (possible Children (VAWC) Referral System, Barangay
scores are 0, 0. 5 and Violence against Women (VAW) Desk, Womens
1) Economic Empowerment (WEE) Desk, etc.]
*Other GAD Mechanisms Other GAD Function/s Members Date
refer to those in addition
Mechanism/s Established
to the GFPS and the GAD
Established
Database
2.3. Has the No GAD budget Organization utilized Organization utilized Attach the GAD Plan and Budget (GPB) and
organization utilized at utilized less than 5% of total 5% or more of total GAD Accomplishment Report (GAD AR) of the
least 5% of its budget* budget to implement budget to implement organization for the same fiscal year (e.g. 2013
to implement GAD GAD PAPs GAD PAPs GPB and GAD AR)
PAPs? (possible scores
are 0, 0. 5 and 1) If no, explain why budget allocated for the imple-
mentation of GAD PAPs is less than 5%?
*refers to the total GAA of

NGAs and LGUs or COB _______________________________________
for GOCCs _______________________________________
_______________________________________
2.4. Has engagement Organization has Organization Organization has List down consultations with organizations/
with organizations not engaged with has sporadic established working individuals regarding the conduct of GAD-related
such as PCW, LGUs agencies/LGUs, engagement with engagement with PAPs of the organization (e.g. conduct of a
and/or other agencies, institutions and/or agencies/LGUs, agencies/LGUs, series of capacity development activities and
and individuals been individuals towards institutions and/or institutions and/or technical assistance for the preparation of GPB,
established towards the conduct of GAD- individuals towards individuals towards etc.):
the conduct of GAD- related PAPs the conduct of GAD- the conduct of GAD-
related PAPs for the related PAPs related PAPs List of Purpose of Results of
organization? (possible Organizations/ Engagement Engagement
scores are 0, 0. 5 and Individuals (e.g., request
1) Engaged for review of
GAD PB etc.)
2.5. Is the organization No effort from the Organization is Organization If yes, enumerate types of SDD and/or gender
able to collect or organization yet to in the process collecting and statistics collected or generated (e.g., sex-
generate sex- collect or generate of collecting or generating SDD disaggregated profile of employees, client
disaggregated data SDD and/or gender generating SDD and/or gender beneficiaries, cases of VAW, etc.).
(SDD) and/or gender statistics and/or gender statistics _______________________________________
statistics*? (possible statistics _______________________________________
scores are 0, 0. 5 and _______________________________________
1)
If applicable, list down installed gender-
responsive data collection system/s of the
organization (e.g. National Violence Against
Women (NVAW) referral system, gender-
responsive Community-Based Monitoring
System (CBMS) etc.)
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________


7
8
3. Integration of GAD in the Organizations Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
3.1 Do the Other GAD Other GAD Other GAD Attach status/progress report of the other GAD
organizations other mechanisms mechanisms mechanisms mechanisms established by the organization,
GAD mechanisms established but not coordinate and coordinate, monitor including analysis of its functions and
coordinate, monitor and functional monitor progress and generate status/ recommendations.
report the progress of of implementation progress report of
the implementation of but do not generate implementation
its functions? (possible status/progress
scores are 0, 0.5 and 1) report
3.2 Has the Organization utilized Organization utilized Organization utilized Attach the GPB and GAD AR from the same
organization utilized 5% or less of total 6-29% of total 30% or more of total fiscal year (e.g. 2013 GPB and 2013 GAD AR)
30% or more of its total budget to implement budget to implement budget to implement
budget* to implement GAD PAPs GAD PAPs GAD PAPs
GAD PAPs? (possible
scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)

NGAs and LGUs or COB for
GOCCs
3.3 Has the With AOM indicating With AOM indicating With AOM Attach a copy of the Audit Observation
organization judiciously non-utilization non-utilization of commending the Memo (AOM) or Notice of Suspension
utilized its GAD budget of at least 5% at least 5% of its judicious use of and Disallowances (NDs) received from
to implement GAD of its budget for budget for GAD GAD funds or no the Commission on Audit (COA) and the
activities based on its GAD or Notice with acceptable AOM from COA organizations justification, if applicable.
GPB? (possible scores of Disallowance justification from the indicating non-
are 0, 0.5 and 1) from COA with no organization utilization of at least
justification from the 5% of its budget for
organization GAD
3.4 Has the Has not partnered Partnered with Partnered with 2 or List the partnership/s or joint program/s towards
organization partnered with other 1 organization more organizations the strategic implementation of the organizations
with agencies/ organizations towards the strategic towards the strategic GAD PAPs (e.g. partnership for the conduct of a
LGUs, institutions towards the strategic implementation of implementation of GAD-related program)
and/or individuals implementation of GAD PAPs GAD PAPs
towards the strategic GAD PAPs Name of GAD Type of Inclusive
implementation of its Partner Effort Engagement Dates
GAD PAPs? (possible Agency/ Implemented
Institution/
scores are 0, 0.5 and 1) Individual
If applicable, attach copies of Memorandum

of Agreement (MOA), Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU), Terms of Reference
(TORs), Partnership Agreement, etc.

9
10
3.5 Is the organization No SDD or gender SDD and/or gender SDD and/or gender List GAD-related data and indicators used in the
utilizing sex- statistics utilized in statistics utilized statistics utilized development planning cycle.
disaggregated the development in 1-2 stages of in all stages of
data and/or gender planning cycle the development the development Development Data Utilized Output Indicators
statistics in the planning cycle planning cycle Planning Used to
development planning Cycle Stage Measure
Gender-
cycle (planning, Related
implementation Impacts of
and management PAPs
and monitoring and
evaluation)? (possible

4. Advanced GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
4.1 Are the Other GAD Other GAD Other GAD Attach status/progress report, client satisfaction
organizations other mechanisms are mechanisms are mechanisms are survey, results of gender impact assessment,
GAD mechanisms able fully functional fully functional fully functional and documented testimonies, etc.

to contribute towards but still has to and contributing to resulted in desired
the attainment of its contribute to the the attainment of impact/s
desired impact/s? attainment of desired impact/s
(possible scores are 0, desired impact/s
0.5 and 1)
4.2 Has the Organization utilized Organization utilized Organization utilized Attach the GPB and GAD AR of the organization
organization utilized 30% or less of total 31-69% of total 70% or more of total for the same fiscal year (e.g. 2013 GPB and
70% or more of its total budget to implement budget to implement budget to implement 2013 GAD AR).
budget* to implement GAD PAPs GAD PAPs GAD PAPs
GAD PAPs? (possible
GOCCs
4.3 Is the organizations Database has no Database with Database with Enumerate sector-specific KPs developed from
database with sex- SDD and/or gender SDD and/or gender SDD and/or gender database with SDD and/or gender statistics (e.g.
disaggregated data statistics and is not statistics generated statistics generated caselets, case studies, briefers, fact sheets,
and/or gender statistics able to generate 1-2 sector-specific 3 or more sector- etc.).
able to generate sector- sector-specific KPs KPs on GAD specific KPs on GAD
specific knowledge on GAD Title of Sector Content of the Utilization of
products (KPs) on Specific Knowledge the
GAD? (possible scores Knowledge Products Knowledge
are 0, 0.5 and 1) Products Products

11
12
4.4 Is the organizations M&E system is not M&E system able M&E system able Attach copies of M&E reports reflecting gen-
M&E system able able to track gender- to track gender- to track gender- der-related impacts of the organizations GAD
to track the desired related impacts related impacts of related impacts of PAPs on its internal and external clients, such
gender-related impacts of GAD PAPs on GAD PAPs on either GAD PAPs on both as:
of its GAD PAPs on clients (internal and internal or external internal and external
clients (internal and external) clients clients 1. NGAs: Gender Impact Assessment (GIA);
external)? (possible Annual Audit Reports (AARs); Audit
scores are 0, 0.5 and 1) Financial Reports (AFRs); Special Audit
Reports (SARs); Socio-Economic Reports
(SERs), Philippine Development Plan
(PDP) Reports, program/project reports,
accomplishment reports and other related
knowledge products (KPs);
2. LGUs: End of term reports; Annual

Audit Reports (AARs); administrative/
accomplishment reports; State of the
Municipal Address (SOMA); State of
the Province Address (SOPA), Socio-
Economic Reports (SERs), Regional
Project Monitoring & Evaluation System

(RPMES) Reports, program/project
reports, and other related knowledge
products
Identify indicators that measure gender-related

impacts of the organizations GAD PAPs.
4.5 Does the KM system does not KM system has KM system has Explain how the organizations KM system
organization have have GAD-related GAD-related KPs GAD-related KPs facilitates the sharing of GAD-related KPs to its
a Knowledge KPs accessed and accessed and clients (internal and/or external).
Management (KM) utilized by either utilized by both
System with GAD- internal or external internal and external _______________________________________
related knowledge clients clients _______________________________________
products (KPs)? _______________________________________
0.5 and 1) Attach the list of KPs produced and shared
through the KM system as well as the KM Plan/
framework or link of the KM system, if applicable.

5. Model GAD Structures and Systems (max score: 5; for each item or question:1)
5.1 Has the GFPS not yet GFPS nominated, GFPS awarded List awards/citations/documented testimonies
organizations GAD recognized as model shortlisted or as model GAD received.
Focal Point System GAD mechanism cited as model mechanism
been recognized or by reputable GAD mechanism by reputable Awarding Local/ Award/ Year
awarded as a model organizations by reputable organizations Institutions National/ Citations
International Received
GAD mechanism on gender organizations on gender
by reputable mainstreaming on gender mainstreaming
local, national, mainstreaming
and international
organizations on
gender mainstreaming?
0.5 and 1)

13
14
5.2 Has the Other GAD Other GAD Other GAD List awards/citations/documented testimonies
organizations other mechanisms not yet mechanisms mechanisms received.
GAD mechanisms been recognized by other recognized as recognized as
recognized as models organizations as models by 1-2 models by 3 or more Awarding Local/ Award/ Year
by other organizations? models organizations organizations Institutions National/ Citations
International Received
0.5 and 1)
5.3 Has the Organization utilized Organization utilized Organization utilized Attach the GPB and GAD AR of the organization
organization utilized 70% or less of its 71-99% or less of 100% of its total for the same fiscal year (e.g. 2013 GPB and
100% of its total total budget to its total budget to budget to implement 2013 GAD AR)
budget* to implement implement GAD implement GAD GAD PAPs
GAD PAPs? (possible PAPs PAPs
GOCCs

5.4 Has the Database with Database with Database with Please provide link of database with SDD.
organization established SDD and/or gender SDD and/or gender SDD and/or gender
a centralized database statistics established statistics established statistics established If the data is not uploaded in a website, list the
with sex-disaggregated but accessible only and accessible to and accessible to information/data that are accessible to regional
data and/or gender to the central office the central office, the central office, offices, attached agencies, external clients and
statistics accessible regional offices and regional offices partner organizations.
to its regional offices attached agencies and attached
and attached agencies, agencies, as well
as well as external as to external
clients and partner clients and partner
organizations? organizations
0.5 and 1)
5.5 Is the Knowledge KM system of the KM system of KM system of Explain how GAD is integrated in the KM
Management (KM) organization not the organization the organization system of the organization and list down other
system of the integrated with GAD integrated with GAD integrated with organizations that replicated the KM system.
organization integrated and not replicated by and replicated by GAD and replicated
with GAD and replicated other organizations 1-2 organizations by 3 or more _______________________________________
by other organizations? organizations _______________________________________
(possible scores are 0, _______________________________________
0.5 and 1)

TOTAL GMEF SCORE

(Enabling Mechanisms)

15
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL
PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES/PROJECTS (PAPs)
The PAPs questionnaire consists of 30 questions that assess the organizations
progress in mainstreaming GAD in all of its programs, activities and projects, whether through
policy and/or plan formulation and issuances, capacitating the GFPS members, generating
top-level management support on GAD and the establishment of enabling GAD mechanisms.
At the Foundation Formulation level, the organization has expressed initial support
to gender mainstreaming through conduct of GAD capacity development sessions
for its GFPS members, top management and the rest of its employees. It has also
involved clients to ensure that their gender issues are taken into account, while also
engaging with PCW and relevant organizations and individual experts on GAD. It is
also at this stage that the organization plans or sets-up a GAD corner containing GAD
IEC materials or references for the use of its clients (internal and external).
At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, the organization already has a GAD
agenda or strategic framework to guide its gender mainstreaming efforts through the
implementation of its GAD Plan and Budget. Deepening sessions for GFPS members
and concerned staff members are also conducted, especially on the application of
gender analysis tools. These sessions are meant to further guide them on how to
intensify gender mainstreaming efforts in the organization. Lastly, IEC materials are
customized for the organizations use and a GAD section in the website is planned or
set-up.
At the GAD Application level, the organization ensures that the implementation of
its GAD PAPs, especially those in the GAD Plan and Budget are monitored. External
clients are also capacitated through relevant GAD sessions. Finally, a Knowledge
Management (KM) system to ensure the transfer of knowledge on GAD is set-up.
At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the organization

ensures that monitoring of its GAD PAPs is sustained and its impacts evaluated. Sector-
specific GAD capacity development sessions for both internal and external clients are
also conducted, as well as periodic applications and re-application of gender analysis
tools to ensure integration of GAD in the organizations PAPs. A sustainability action
plan for GAD is also developed.
At the Replication and Innovation level, the organization is now recognized as a

learning hub for its noteworthy GAD efforts with convergence models resulting from its
partnerships. GAD knowledge products and IEC materials produced by the organization
are also utilized by other organizations as references or models to develop their own
GAD-related materials.
Telephone: +632.7365249 or +632.7367712
Fax Number: +632.7364449
GMEF SCORESHEET
Key Areas Score

Policy
5. Model GAD Policy
Sub-Total:
Level for Policy:
People
5. GAD Experts
Sub-Total:
2 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Programs/Activities/Projects

Level Mechanisms
Per Entry
the ratings:
Over-all Mechanisms

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Programs/Activities/Projects 3

4
PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES AND PROJECTS (PAPs) ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

NO PARTLY YES item
1. Initial Activities to Facilitate GAD Mainstreaming (max score: 5; for each item or question:0.83)
1.1 Is the organization Organization has Organization Organization Enumerate GAD-related events initiated
observing international/ not initiated or initiated or initiated or or participated by the organization (e.g.
national/local GAD- participated in participated in participated in 3 or International Womens Day celebration).
related events (possible the observance 1-2 observance more observance
scores are 0, 0.41 and of international/ of international/ of international/ GAD- Initiated Participated Date
0.83) national/ local GAD- national/ local GAD- national/ local GAD- related Conducted
related events related events related events event
1.2 Has the No Basic GAD Basic GAD Basic GAD Attach training design, attendance sheets and
organization conducted orientation or GST Orientation or GST Orientation or GST results of training evaluation, if available.
Basic GAD Orientation conducted for its conducted for either conducted for both
or Gender Sensitivity clients internal or external internal and external If no, explain why GAD Orientation or Gender
GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Programs/Activities/Projects

Training (GST) for its clients clients Sensitivity Training (GST) has not been
clients (internal and conducted for the organizations clients.
0.83)
1.3 Has the No consultation Conducted Conducted Discuss the results of consultation activities
organization conducted conducted with consultation with consultation with conducted.
consultation activities clients either internal or both internal and
with clients (internal external clients external clients Group Purpose Results of
and external) to to identify gender to identify gender Consulted Consultation
identify gender issues issues and issues and (Internal/ (gender
and corresponding corresponding corresponding External) issues and
strategies? (possible strategies strategies strategies
scores are 0, 0.41 and identified)
0.83)
If consultations were conducted, what gender-

related issues were reflected in the GPB?
1.4 Has the No consultation Initiated consultation Initiated consultation Enumerate results of consultations initiated
organization consulted conducted at all with either PCW with both PCW including names of organizations/individuals
PCW and relevant or relevant and relevant consulted.
organizations/ organizations/ organizations/
individuals on its GAD individuals on its individuals on its Name of Agenda of the Results of the
mainstreaming efforts? GAD mainstreaming GAD mainstreaming organizations/ Consultation Consultation
(possible scores are 0, efforts efforts individuals
0.41 and 0.83) Consulted

5
6
1.5 Has the No review of existing 1-3 existing IEC 4 or more existing Provide a list of IEC materials reviewed and
organization reviewed IEC materials and materials and KPs IEC materials and revised to ensure use of gender-fair language
and revised existing KPs conducted reviewed but not KPs reviewed and and images.
Information/Education/ revised revised
Communication
(IEC) materials and
Knowledge Products
(KPs) to ensure use of
gender-fair language
and images? (possible
0.83)
1.6 Has the No plan to set up GAD IEC materials Established GAD Provide a copy of the plan or photo layout of
organization set up a GAD corner and KPs compiled corner with updated the GAD corner and list down titles of existing
GAD corner? (possible and collected to set GAD IEC materials Information/Education/Communication (IEC)
scores are 0, 0.41 and up GAD corner and KPs materials and KPs available for use and
0.83) reference of clients and GAD Focal Point System
(GFPS) members.

(Level 1 PAPs)
2. Establishing Commitment towards Gender Mainstreaming (max score: 5; for each item or question: 0.62)
2.1 Has the No GAD agenda or Draft GAD agenda GAD agenda or Attach draft or approved GAD agenda and/
organization formulated strategic framework or strategic strategic framework or strategic framework (e.g. Department Order
GAD agenda or formulated framework formulated and setting 3-year GAD agenda of agencies or GAD
strategic framework? formulated approved Code for LGUs).
0.31 and 0.62)
2.2 Has the GPB is not based on GPB is based on GPB is based on Attach GPB for the most recent fiscal year citing
organization developed GAD agenda/GAD at least 1 of the at least 3 of the the basis for its development.
its GAD Plan and Code, emerging following: GAD following: GAD
Budget (GPB) based gender issues, agenda/GAD Code, agenda/GAD Code, Content of Basis of Remarks
on GAD agenda, international/national emerging gender emerging gender GPB Development
emerging gender GAD mandates and/ issues, international/ issues, international/ (GAD agenda/
issues, international/ or results of gender national GAD national GAD GAD Code,
national GAD mandates analysis mandates and/or mandates and/or emerging
gender issues,
and/or results of gender results of gender results of gender international/
analysis? (possible analysis analysis national GAD
scores are 0, 0.31 and mandates/
0.62) results of gender
analysis)

7
8
2.3 Has the No deepening Conducted Conducted Enumerate the deepening sessions on GAD
organization conducted sessions on GAD deepening session/s deepening sessions conducted for GFPS and concerned staff:
deepening sessions conducted on GAD for either on GAD for either
on GAD based on the the GFPS or GFPS or concerned Title of TA Provider Date
results of the Training concerned staff staff members of Deepening (in house Conducted
Needs Assessment members but not based on the results Session trainer, PCW)
(TNA) or updated GAD based on the results of TNA or updated
policies and tools as of TNA or updated GAD policies or
part of the continuing GAD policies or tools
capacity development tools
of GAD Focal Point Also attach a copy of Training Needs Analysis
System (GFPS) (TNA) results and design of deepening sessions.
and concerned staff
If TNA was not administered, please explain
members? (possible
how the organization identified the need for
deepening sessions and explain the basis for the
0.62)
training design/s used.
2.4 Has the No GA tool applied Results of the Results of the Enumerate GA tools used to develop, review
organization used to develop, review application of GA application of GA and/or enhance PAPs.
Gender Analysis (GA) and/or enhance tools used to review, tools used to review,

tools and techniques PAPs enhance or develop enhance or develop Name of GA tools Results of
in the review, 1-2 PAPs 3 or more PAPs PAPs Applied Application
enhancement or
development of PAPs?
0.31 and 0.62)
2.5 Does the No facilities and With existing With existing Enumerate facilities and services addressing
organization have services addressing facilities and facilities and gender issues and concerns of the organization.
facilities and services gender issues and services that services that
that address the gender concerns of the address the gender address gender GAD Facilities Clients Gender
issues and concerns of organizations clients issues and concerns issues and concerns and Services (internal/ Issues and
its clients (internal and of either internal or of both internal and external) Concerns
external)? (possible external clients external clients Addressed
0.62)
(e.g. Facilities to address strategic and practical

gender needs of women and men employees
such as child-minding center, breastfeeding
center, and CODI, among others)
2.6 Has the No GAD orientation Developed GAD Developed GAD Attach copy of GAD orientation module(s) with
organization developed module with gender orientation module orientation module gender-sensitivity as a core competency.
orientation modules for sensitivity as a but not yet included and included in the
new employees with core competency in the orientation of orientation of new
gender-sensitivity as developed new employees employees
a core competency?
0.31 and 0.62)
2.7 Has the No new GAD IEC Developed but has Developed and Provide list of new GAD IEC materials and the
organization developed materials developed not disseminated disseminated new target audience.
and disseminated new new GAD IEC GAD IEC materials
Information/Education/ materials GAD IEC Target Remarks
Communication (IEC) materials Audience
materials on GAD to
clients (internal and
0.62)

9
10
2.8 Has the No GAD section in Developed Developed Please list website link for the GAD Section of
organization created the agency website GAD section in GAD section in the organization.
a GAD section in its organization website organization website
website? (possible but not updated and regularly
scores are 0, 0.31 and updated
0.62)

(Level 2 PAPs)
3. GAD Application (max score: 5; for each item or question: 0.71)
3.1 Has the Implementation Implementation Implementation of Attach monitoring reports on the implementation
organization monitored of GAD PAPs not of GAD PAPs GAD PAPs regularly of GAD PAPs.
the implementation monitored intermittently monitored and
of its GAD Programs/ monitored and not reported
Activities/Projects reported
(PAPs)? (possible
0.71)
3.2 Has the GPB and GAD AR GPB and GAD AR GPB and GAD AR Provide copies of submitted and/or endorsed

organization prepared not submitted to submitted to PCW*/ endorsed by PCW*/ GAD Plans and Budgets (GPBs) and GAD
and submitted on PCW/DILG DILG** but not DILG** Accomplishment Reports (GAD ARs), including
time its GAD Plan and endorsed cover letters.
Budget (GPB) and GAD
Accomplishment Report
(GAD AR)? (possible
0.71)
*PCW endorses GPBs of
NGAs, GOCCs and SUCs
**DILG endorses GPBs of

LGUs
3.3 Has the No GAD capacity GAD capacity GAD capacity List GAD capacity development activities
organization conducted development development development conducted for clients.
and sustained the GAD conducted and conducted and conducted and
capacity development sustained for clients sustained for either sustained for both GAD Capacity Target Inclusive
of its clients (internal internal or external internal and external Development Participants Dates
and external)? (possible clients clients Activities
0.71)
3.4 Has the No GAD capacity Conducted Conducted Enumerate GAD capacity development sessions
organization conducted development GAD capacity GAD capacity conducted, and provide a list of internal experts
GAD capacity session conducted development development and their areas of expertise developed through
development sessions to develop internal session but no session that resulted these sessions.
for its internal GAD GAD experts internal GAD experts in the development
experts? (possible developed of internal GAD Title and Internal GAD Remarks
scores are 0, 0.35 and experts Date of GAD Experts
0.71) Capacity Developed
Development
Activity
Conducted
3.5 Has the No GA tools applied GA tools applied GA tools applied Enumerate GA tools applied in any stage of the
organization regularly in development in 1-2 levels of in all levels of development planning cycle and the frequency of
applied Gender Analysis planning cycle the development the development application.
(GA) tools in the planning cycle planning cycle
development planning GAD Tools Purpose of Result of Date of
cycle (planning, Applied Application Application Application
implementation
and management,
and monitoring and
evaluation)? (possible

0.71)
11
12
3.6 Has the GAD section has not GAD section GAD section Provide a schedule involving the update of the
organization regularly been updated for updated annually updated quarterly or GAD section in the organizations website.
updated its GAD more than a year more often
section in the website?
0.35 and 0.71)
3.7 Has the No existing plan to Has initial plan to set Has set up a KM Attach the Knowledge Management (KM) system
organization set set up KM up KM system to transfer plan/framework or web link.
up a Knowledge knowledge on GAD
Management (KM)
system as a mechanism
to transfer knowledge
on GAD? (possible
0.71)

(Level 3 PAPs)
4. GAD Commitment and Institutionalization (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.0)

4.1 Has the GAD mandate not GAD mandates GAD mandates List down GAD-related mandates being
organization sustained implemented and continuously continuously implemented and monitored by the organization
implementation monitored implemented but not implemented and and attach the relevant monitoring reports.
and monitoring of regularly monitored regularly monitored
international, national by the organization by the organization
and local GAD
mandates in its PAPs?
(possible scores are
0,0.5, and 1)
4.2 Has the No organizational Organizational/ Organizational/ List down titles of organizational/sector-
organization conducted sector- specific sector-specific sector-specific specific capacity development session/s
organizational/sector- capacity GAD capacity GAD capacity on GAD conducted or discuss status of the
specific capacity development development development development of sector-specific GAD capacity
development sessions session/s on GAD session/s conducted session/s conducted development session/s for clients being done
on GAD for clients conducted for either internal or for both internal or by the organization (e.g. Womens Economic
(internal and external)? external clients external clients Empowerment, Gender and Justice, Gender and
(possible scores are Climate Change).
0,0.5, and 1)
Title of Participants Purpose
Organizational/
Sector-Specific
Capacity
Development
Program on
GAD
Attach activity reports and/or documentation

of the sector-specific capacity development
sessions conducted.
4.3 Does the GAD tools not GAD tools used GAD tools used List down Programs/Activities/Projects (PAPs)
organization regularly applied to assess to assess gender- to assess gender- assessed and list of gender analysis (GA) tools
apply gender analysis PAPs responsiveness of responsiveness of 3 regularly applied by the organization.
(GA) tools to assess 1-2 PAPs or more PAPs
gender-responsiveness GA Tools PAP Assessed Results of
of programs/activities/ Applied Application
projects (PAPs)?
0,0.5, and 1)

13
14
4.4 Has the No sustainability Draft sustainability Sustainability action Attach draft or approved sustainability action
organization developed action plan on GAD action plan on GAD plan on GAD PAPs plan on GAD PAPs of the organization.
a sustainability action PAPs formulated PAPs formulated formulated and
plan for its GAD PAPs? approved
0,0.5, and 1)
4.5 Has the Gender impact Impact assessment Impact assessment Attach a copy of Gender Impact Assessment
organization conducted assessment not yet of GAD PAPs on- of GAD PAPs Report of the organizations GAD PAPs.
impact evaluation of its conducted going completed and
GAD PAPs? (possible reported
scores are 0,0.5, and
1)

(Level 4 PAPs)
5. Model PAPs (max score: 5; for each item or question: 1.25)
5.1 Has the Organization is still Organization has Organization has List down awards/citations/recognitions/

organization been developing notable been recognized as been recognized as nominations received.
recognized as a GAD GAD PAPs a learning hub but a learning hub and
learning hub for its GAD PAPs are not its GAD PAPs are GAD Award/Citation Year
notable GAD PAPs? yet replicated replicated by other Program/ Received
(possible scores are 0, organizations Activity/
0.62 and 1.25) Project
Recognized
If nominated/cited/certified, kindly attach

photocopy of certificate/recognition received and
include press releases, photos, and documented
testimonies, if applicable.
5.2 Has the No convergence Convergence model Convergence model Describe GAD convergence model that resulted
organizations model resulting from recognized but not recognized and from the partnership and list down organizations
partnership with partnership replicated replicated that replicated it.
stakeholders resulted in
a convergence model
that is recognized
and replicated by
other organizations?
0.62 and 1.25)
5.3 Has the GAD KPs and GAD GAD KPs and GAD KPs and List down GAD KPs and GAD Information/
organizations IEC materials not yet GAD IEC materials GAD IEC materials Education/Communication (IEC) materials
Knowledge cited as reference by used and cited as used and cited as developed and utilized by the organization (e.g.
Products (KPs) and other organizations reference by at 1-2 reference by 3 or MCW mobile application, videos, brochures,
Information/Education/ organizations more organizations etc.).
Communication
(IEC) materials on Type of GAD KP/ Organiza- Remarks
GAD been used by GAD KP/ GAD IEC tions that
other organizations? GAD IEC Material Utilized
(possible scores are 0, Material Developed GAD KP/
0.62 and 1.25) GAD IEC
Material

15
16
5.4 Has the Award system not Award system Award/incentive Attach criteria for the existing award/incentive
organizations existing yet integrated with being reviewed for system integrated system integrated with GAD perspective and
award/incentive system GAD perspective integration of GAD with GAD provide list of the awardees.
been integrated with perspective perspective
GAD perspective?
0.62 and 1.25)

(Level 5 PAPs)
TOTAL GMEF SCORE

(PAPs)

GMEF SCORESHEET
Name of Organization Assessed: _________________________________________________________________
Date Administered:______________________________________________________________________________
Inclusive Period of Assessment: __________________________________________________________________
Key Areas Score

Policy
5. Model GAD Policy
Sub-Total:
Level for Policy:
People
1. For Establishing GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates
2. For GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities
3. For GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs
5. GAD Experts
Sub-Total:
Level for People:
Enabling Mechanisms
1. Setting-up of Essential GAD Mechanisms
2. Functional GAD Mechanisms
3. Integration of GAD in the Organizations Mechanisms
4. Advanced GAD Structures and Systems
5. Model GAD Structures and Systems
Sub-Total:
Level for Enabling Mechanisms:
Programs, Activities and Projects (PAPs)
1. Initial Activities to Facilitate GAD Mainstreaming
2. Establishing Commitment towards GAD Mainstreaming
3. GAD Application
4. GAD Commitment and Institutionalization
5. Model PAPs
Sub-Total:
Level for PAPs:
TOTAL SCORE
Over-all Level:
Telephone: +632.7365249 or +632.7367712
Fax Number: +632.7364449
Level Per Entry 8-14.99 points 2: Installation of Strategic Mechanisms
20-23.99 points 4: Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization
31-60.99 points 2: Installation of Strategic Mechanisms
Over-all Level
61-80.99 points 3: GAD Application
81-95.99 points 4: Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization
2 GMEF Scoresheet

2016.05.31 Gmef Tool Kit

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

2016.05.31 Gmef Tool Kit

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

A HANDBOOK ON THE APPLICATION OF THE ENHANCED A TOOLKIT ON THE ENHANCED GENDER MAINSTREAMING EVALUATION FRAMEWORK

GENDER MAINSTREAMING EVALUATION FRAMEWORK

ENHANCED GENDER MAINSTREAMING EVALUATION FRAMEWORK

At the Foundation Formation level, organizations issue policies supporting the

At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, organizations progress to the

At the GAD Application level, a GAD agenda or strategic framework is already

At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the plans and

A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework

Name of the Organization Assessed: ________________________________

Date Administered: _______________________________________________

Inclusive Period of Assessment: ____________________________________

Key Areas Score

2 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy

6. Organizations should take note of questions/descriptors with NO and PARTLY

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy 3

DESCRIPTORS SCORE Score per Means of Verification/Remarks

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy

Sub-total GMEF Score

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy

Title Type Date Issued

Title Type Purpose/ Date

Sub-total GMEF Score

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy

5. Model GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 5)

Sub-total GMEF Score

TOTAL GMEF SCORE

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy

At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the organizations

A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework

Name of the Organization Assessed: ________________________________

Date Administered: _______________________________________________

Inclusive Period of Assessment: ____________________________________

Key Areas Score

2 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

6. Organizations should take note of questions/descriptors with NO and PARTLY

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People 3

DESCRIPTORS SCORE Score per Means of Verification/Remarks

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

Sub-total GMEF Score

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

Attach training design and attendance sheets of

*Type of Involvement of Male Employees: as participants,

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

Also attach results of assessments or surveys

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

Sub-total GMEF Score

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

Sub-total GMEF Score

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

Sub-total GMEF Score

TOTAL GMEF SCORE

GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People

At the Foundation Formation level, the organization has established or reconstituted

At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the organizations

A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework

Name of the Organization Assessed: ________________________________

Date Administered: _______________________________________________