The lecture and the reading passage have diffetrent ways to focus the fact that some teachears

appear on TV. The reading article, in general, has a positive viewpoint about the topic, while
the lecture shows an opinion that highlights the negative aspects about TV teacher's
appearings.

One of the strongest contrast points between the lecture and the article is the impact that a
teacher on TV has. The article states that this impact is positive for the teaches, for the public
and for the university the teacher works for. The main criterion to sustain this viewpoint is that
the TV is a massive way to reach people: while in the campus the teacher can be listened by a
narrow audience, through TV the teacher can be llistened by a wide audience who could learn
about a topic from the experience and research of an expert. On the other hand, the lecture
suggests that this appearings are not good for the techers, nor the university, nor the audience
because TV doesn't find the real background of a certain topic, but only the title; this fact feeds
the idea thtat a techers of appears on TV is not a serious academic.

The lecture and the article shows two very different ways of thinking about this topic. Both
expresses specifict viewpoints about the reality of TV, which is a powerful way to reach people,
but, on the other hand, it only looks for entertainment.

It is really difficult to determine which goroup of people enjoy more their lives. First are the
young people, who have fresh ideas that are according to the new changes that the world have
respect their parents' generation, who have the energy to do everything they want without
taking care about the cosequences and have a life with a wide perspective and big ambitions.
On the other hand are the olders, who have experience in life and experience in the way which
life can be enjoyed, enclosing their decissions between the limits of responsability and
sensibleness.

Yung people are those who "don't care". Life is not only for study or work, life is for enjoy, get
fun and listen to rock and roll. Traveling and getting experiences are main aspects on youngers'
lifes because the world is a big place and the time is short to develope this grat adventure. This
people are not too serious, always are laughing and trying to express their view points about
fields they consider important. In other words, youth is an open door to adventure and joy, but
not everything is perfect because generally youngs people don't have money, and this is a
limitation at the momet of joy, however, it is not an obstacle for feelling life as the best
adventure ever.

The other team is conformed by the olders, who are about 40 years and more. Olders have
some advantanges on their lifes: first, they have already enjoyed their lifes in their youth,
therefore, they have experience; second, this people work, some of them love their works
while others don't, but by working they have money, and money can buy a good hotel, a good
meal, etc.; and third, older people are working in their own projects, some of them want to be
trascendent in the life, share experience or do something good for this world. On the other
hand, olders don't have as much time as youngers, and this is a big limitation.

As conclussion, I culdnt say that young people enjoy life more than older people because
there are different ways to enjoy life and this has no a limit of age. What really is important is
to enjoy life witout taking care the age you are.