Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Significant Figures
Rounding off Numbers
Mathematical operations with Significant Figures
Precision & Accuracy
Uncertainty
Significant Figures
Examples: S.No.
(unit)
Significant
Figures
a) 6152 4
Allifnon
If zero numbers
decimal
no point,
decimal point b) 5400* 2
are
zero significant
Anyafter
zerothe nonzero c)
Any zero between 5230. 4
digitsaresignificant
thats before d) 986.7 4
non zero numbers
Butandzero before
after the
all of the e) 5002 4
are significant
nonzero
nonzero digits f) 54.00 4
digitsareinsignificant
isinsignificant g) 052320 4
h) 0.005230 4
i) 54.0 102 3
j) 4.050 4
*Zeroes may or may not be significant for numbers like
5400
(where it is not clear whether two, three, or four
significant figures are indicated).
Conversion Factors
1 inch = 2.54 cm, 1 kg = 1000 g, 1 cal = 4.182 J etc.
Coefficients of Formula
C = 2 r ,
= 3.1415926535897932384626433832795
Circumference of a circle : C = 2 r
Since, A = r2
=
Let us try:
Find the circumference of a circle with uncertainty.
Radius of circle, r = (3.0 0.2) cm (measured value)
It is not a final
answer.
Rounding off Numbers
12.345 12.345
+2.6 - 2.6
------------ ------------
14.945 Discard 9.745 Discard
Round off Round off
= 14.9 = 9.7
Report Report
12.34
1.2 15.876
______
------------ 2.5
14.808 Discard = 6.3504 Discard
Round off Round off
= 15 = 6.4
Report Report
9
4
(3.0 10 ) (3.0 10 ) =5
9 10
9
But 9.0 10
9
5 4
(6.0 10 ) (2.0 10 ) = 12 10
10
But 1.2 10
6
2.0 10
2
4 = 2.0 10
1.0 10
4
1.0 10
-2
6
= 0.5 10
2.0 10 -3
But = 5.0 10
5 3
(1.400 10 ) + (3.200 10 )
3 3
= (140.0 10 ) + (3.200 10 )
3
=143.2 10
But
5
= 1.432 10
Accuracy & Precision
Accuracy:
Precision:
To a mathematician, 41.6 cm or 41.60 cm are the same.
A measure
A measure
of how close
of how
anexactly
experimental
the result
result
is determined.
is to the true value.
It is also
Thea higher
measuretheofaccuracy
how reproducible
the lower the result
error. is.
BUT
0
0.0
0.00
Which are correct?
while
T= (0.94 0.05) F
Two types of errors effect our results:
Systematic errors:
these influence the
accuracy
Random errors:
these influence precision
Systematic errors
Difficult produce
Typically to detectconstantand throughout
cannot be a
analyzed
set of readings
Proper
These statistically
calibration
errors andbe,
might i.e.general,
adjustment
in Increased
of due
the to
Examples:
statistics
equipment
built-in can NEVER
will
errors inhelp
the reduce
to Systematic
reduce
instrument the
either in
Which
The metal leads
ruler to
will a clustering
contract at low of the
Error
measured !
systematic
design or errors
calibration
values around i.e.
a value Controlled
displaced
temperatures
through andoftherefore
skill experimenter over estimate the
from the
true length. "true" value of the quantity
Forget to adjust zero error of the instrument
Random errors
Due to
Typically
Limitations cannot betool
of measuring
Unpredictable, controlled
non-deterministic
Examples:
Observer readingcan reduce random errors!
Increased
Irregularstatistics
Unbiased equal
Randomchanges probability
in the
processes heatsystem
within of increasing
loss rate from a solar
collector due to changes in the wind.
or decreasing measured
Timings with a stopwatch. Sometimes you may
value
stop the watch too soon, sometimes too late.
Reporting Uncertainty
xx
x b exs t
If x = 1.43 106 s & x = 2 104 s,
The answer should be as
x = (1.43 0.02) 106 s
x = (1.43 10 2 10 ) s
6 4
xx
Rule for Stating Uncertainties
Experimental uncertainties should almost
always be
rounded to one significant figure
For example : 1.63 0.01
Excepti g
on!
Rounding the uncertainty to two figures
if it starts with a 1
For example : 18.8
You must explain how you estimated each uncertainty.
For example:
The reactor temperature was (35 2) C.
The uncertainty. . .
.........is
.is given
.isthe bythe
estimatedthebased
standard
.represents manufacturers
95% onofthe
deviation 10 limits for
confidence
specifications
thermometer
measurements
10 measurements for the
scale.
made thermometer.
over
made the the
over 30 minutes
30 of
the experiment.
minutes of the experiment.
Returning to the main problem
Between 60 and 70 mm
Estimate next digit, 4
Measurement: 64 mm
Between 64 and 65
mm
8.41 0.01V
ii) Let Z = X Y or Z = X /Y
Then maximum value of relative error in Z is Z / Z = (X / X) + (Y / Y)
iii) Let Z = Xm
Then maximum value of relative error in Z is Z / Z = m (X / X)
= 18.852 From
Calculator
C = C(r/r) = 1.2568 cm From
Calculator
C = (18.9 1.3) cm
Examples: 1.
The length of a rod measured with a meter scale of
least count
0.1 cm is 13.6 cm.
The length is recorded as 13.6 cm 0.1 cm.
The length of a second rod measured with the same
scale is
Solution:
5.2 cm 0.1 cm. Find sum and difference of two
The sum of two lengths = (13.6 0.1 ) + (5.2 0.1)
lengths.
= (18.8 0.2 ) cm
R = 2.06 0.01
d = 0.57 0.01 mm = (0.57 0.01 ) 10-3m
l = 105.6 0.1 cm = (105.6 0.1) 10-2 m
Solution:
=
= 4.977 10-7
m
Now max. permissible error in
= 0.20350 10-7 m
= (5.0 0.2) 10-7
Graphs
Current (mA)
O X
Voltage (V)
Graph between voltage & current
But connect like
Y
Current (mA)
O X
Voltage (V)
BEST-FIT LINES (BY INSPECTION)
The line should be drawn so that
there are roughly the same
number of points above and too
below. steep
too
high too
corre
too
Anomalous points should be low
ct
shallow
rechecked. If this is not possible
they should be ignored when Anomalous point
drawing the best-fit line.
Scaling Problem