ENGG951 Rubric for ProjectLibre Marking Assignment 1

Assessment Fail 0-49% Pass 50-64% Credit 65-74% Distinction High Distinction Mark
Component 75-84% 85-100% for
item
Section A Insufficient knowledge Barely adequate Sound easily followed Professional, easily Highly professional,
of steps taken to be knowledge of steps and sufficiently understood and detailed and well-
able to explain to a taken. Brief and a few detailed outline of sufficient illustration structured illustrative
(Out of 30) professional how to deficiencies in steps taken, no gaps, for detailed efficient explanation of all steps,
complete the exercise. explanation of the steps and no excessively communication of the written very clearly and
Motherhood Lacking some useful but vague generalisations, steps with sound succinctly. No use of
statements and vague not essential detail. sufficiently illustrated insight and a few motherhood statements
comments. Serious Occasional for clear helpful frills and tips. and no vague
gaps in the steps overgeneralisation and communication to a No motherhood explanations. Superb
taken. No or incorrect motherhood and some professional engineer. statements and vague aesthetic, professional and
assumptions. (E.g. gaps. Insight adequate No frills but sufficient explanations. highly functional
public holidays) No or but developing. Poor insight to complete the Aesthetic professional presentation. Extensive
incorrect knowledge but adequate exercise. Functional presentation. Good knowledge and treatment
of software presentation. Little presentation. Sound appreciation and of assumptions. In depth
limitations. attention to but correct appreciation and application of most appreciation of software
use of assumptions. application of several assumptions. limitations.
assumptions. (Possibly better than you
could do yourself.)
(Mark 0-14) (Mark 15-19) (Mark 20-23) (Mark 24-26) (Mark 27-30)
Section B Gantt chart, cost Gantt chart, cost All diagrams functional All diagrams All diagrams produced
analysis, histograms analysis, histograms all and mostly correct. functional and perfectly and answers
(Out of 30) not present and/or present and mostly Functional and sound answers 100% correct. 100% correct.
incorrect. Incorrect or correct. Adequate illustration of critical Functional, aesthetic Highly functional and
nonexistent critical illustration of the path and float but and professional professional presentation.
path. Float method of critical path room for some presentation. Little or no room for
nonexistent or and float allocation. improvement. Some room for minor criticism. (A joy to behold)
incorrectly shown. Adequate but not Developing criticism and
Poor, inadequate particularly functional professional suggestions for
presentation or aesthetic presentation with improvement.
presentation. room for improvement.
(Mark 0-14) (Mark 15-19) (Mark 20-23) (Mark 24-26) (Mark 27-30)
Section C Little or no attempt to The beginnings of an A developed attempt A well-researched, A well-researched,
research, discuss or undeveloped attempt to research, discuss structured, presented structured, highly
(Out of 40) analyse the software. to research discuss or and/or analyse PM response with professionally presented
No appreciation of analyse the software. A software. Sound but developed discussion and argued response with
applicability to real- little appreciation of not extensive and conclusions. 1-2 insightful discussion and
life engineering limitations to real-life appreciation of applicable conclusions. 4-5
projects. Little or no engineering projects. limitations to real-life professional and/or professional and/or
meaningful structure Poorly structured and engineering projects. academic references academic references
and presentation to presented report. A Well-structured and correctly cited. Good correctly cited. Insightful
report. No meaningful little insight into the presented report understanding of the professional
insight into the usefulness of the developing insight into applicability of the understanding of
usefulness of the software used. No the usefulness of the software used. applicability of different
software used to a useful references. software used. Possibly Comparisons with types of PM software
professional engineer. a relevant reference or commercial software including comparisons
two. used in real-life with commercial software
engineering projects. used in real-life
engineering projects.
(Mark 0 -19) (Mark 20-25) (Mark 26-29) (Mark 30-33) (Mark 34-40)

Std Name: Std No. Mark Total % Marker

Comments: