Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Republic of The Philippines Cebu City: Plaintiffs-Appellants

    Încărcat de

    Dales Batoctoy
    168 vizualizări5 pagini
    This brief is submitted on behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants in an appeal regarding the reconveyance and partition of property. The plaintiffs argue that (1) the defendants failed to validly acquire the property and the trial court erred in not ruling in favor of reconveyance, (2) the factual findings of the trial court were not supported by evidence, and (3) the plaintiffs are entitled to their shares of the property. The brief cites numerous cases and statutes in support of the plaintiffs' positions regarding ownership, improper acquisition of property, and rights to reconveyance and partition. The plaintiffs request that the decision of the trial court be reversed and that the defendants be ordered to reconvey the property to its rightful

    Descriere originală:

    sample cover appellants brief

    Titlu original

    01 Cover Appellants Brief

    Drepturi de autor

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formate disponibile

    DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    This brief is submitted on behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants in an appeal regarding the reconveyance and partition of property. The plaintiffs argue that (1) the defendants failed to validly acquire the property and the trial court erred in not ruling in favor of reconveyance, (2) the factual findings of the trial court were not supported by evidence, and (3) the plaintiffs are entitled to their shares of the property. The brief cites numerous cases and statutes in support of the plaintiffs' positions regarding ownership, improper acquisition of property, and rights to reconveyance and partition. The plaintiffs request that the decision of the trial court be reversed and that the defendants be ordered to reconvey the property to its rightful

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    168 vizualizări5 pagini

    Republic of The Philippines Cebu City: Plaintiffs-Appellants

    Încărcat de

    Dales Batoctoy
    This brief is submitted on behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants in an appeal regarding the reconveyance and partition of property. The plaintiffs argue that (1) the defendants failed to validly acquire the property and the trial court erred in not ruling in favor of reconveyance, (2) the factual findings of the trial court were not supported by evidence, and (3) the plaintiffs are entitled to their shares of the property. The brief cites numerous cases and statutes in support of the plaintiffs' positions regarding ownership, improper acquisition of property, and rights to reconveyance and partition. The plaintiffs request that the decision of the trial court be reversed and that the defendants be ordered to reconvey the property to its rightful

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 5

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

    COURT OF APPEALS
    Cebu City

    FELISA CODILLA, CHERRY


    ARDIENTE NABLE, RICARDO
    ARDIENTE, JR., ROSALINA
    ARDIENTE DIACOMA,
    EDUARDO ARDIENTE,
    BIENVENIDA ARDIENTE,
    JUANITO ARDIENTE, AVELINO
    ADVIENTE and NARCISA
    ARDIENTE RABASANO.
    Plaintiffs-Appellants

    -versus- C.A. G.R. NO. 98765


    For: RECONVEYANCE &
    PARTITION

    MANUEL CABUENAS and


    AGAPITO CINCO
    Defendants-Appellees
    x-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x

    BRIEF FOR THE APPELLANT

    MAKINANO AND ASSOCIATES


    LAW OFFICE
    Counsels for Plaintiffs-Appellants
    Room 4, 5th floor, Rabusa Towers,
    Cebu Business Park,
    Cebu City, Philippines.
    6000
    Tel. No. (032)2246133
    mklawoffice@gmail.com
    SUBJECT INDEX

    PAGE
    PREFATORY STATEMENT 1

    ASSIGNMENT OF ERRORS 5

    STATEMENT OF THE CASE.. 5

    STATEMENT OF FACTS. 8

    ISSUES 9

    ARGUMENTS 9

    RELIEFS.. 21
    TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

    CASES CITED
    PAGE
    Adong vs. Cheong Seng Gee,
    43 Phil. 43, 56 15

    Ali Akang vs Municipality of Isulan,


    Sultan Kudarat Province,
    G.R. No. 186014, June 26, 2013 9

    Balatero vs, Intermediate Appellate Court,


    G.R. No. 73889, September 30, 1987 4, 19

    Bank of Commerce v. Spouses San Pablo, Jr.,


    550 Phil. 805, 82 1 4, 17

    Bartola M. Vda. De Tirona, et.al, vs.


    Cirilo Encarnacion, GR No. 168902, September 28, 2007 19

    Bogo-Medellin Millin Co., Inc vs.


    Court of Appeals, GR No. 124699, July 31, 2003 20

    Bucoy v. Paulino,
    131 Phil. 790, 800, 1968 17

    Dewara v. Lamela,
    G.R. No. 179010, April 11, 2011 17

    Domingo vs. Molina,


    G.R. No. 200274, April 20, 2016 4, 16

    Go Chi Gun, et al v. Co Cho, et al,


    G.R. No. L-5208. February 28, 1955 20

    In the matter of the Intestate Estates of the


    Deceased Josefa Delgado and Guillermo
    Rustia vs. Heirs of Marciana Rustia Vda.
    de Damian et al., G.R. No. 155733, January 27, 2006 15

    Kalalo v. Luz,
    G.R. No. L-27782, July 31, 1970 18

    Lim Tanhu vs. Ramolete,


    G.R. No. L-40098, August 29, 1975 14

    Manila International Airport Authority vs.


    Ding Velayo Sports Center, Inc., 18
    G.R. No. 161718, December 14, 2011

    Matanguihan vs. Court of Appeals,


    G.R. No. 115033 July 11, 1997 11

    Meneses vs. Venturozo,


    G.R. No. 172196, October 19, 2011 13

    Patriarca v. Orate, G.R. No. L-3191,


    January 26, 1907, 7 PHIL 390-395 10

    Pugeda vs. Trias,


    4 SCRA 849, 855, March 31, 1962 14

    Quiniano vs. CA,


    G.R. No. L-23024, May 31, 1971 2

    Ramos vs. Sarao,


    G.R. No. 149756, February 11, 2005 2, 10,11

    Republic of the Philippines vs. Garcia, et al.,


    91 Phil. 46, 49 18

    Rural Bank of Caloocan, Inc. vs Court of Appeals,


    G.R. No. L-32116 April 2l, 1981 3

    Sps. Jayme vs Hon. Alampay,


    G.R. No. L-39592, January 28, 1975 12

    Tarrosa v. De Leon,
    G.R. No. 185063, July 23, 2009 4, 17

    Trinidad vs. Court of Appeals, et al.,


    G.R. No. 118904, April 20, 1998 3, 14

    STATUTES CITED
    PAGE
    Article 55 of the Civil Code 14

    Article 119 of the Civil Code 4, 16

    Article 143 of the Civil Code 16

    Article 493 of the Civil Code 16

    Article 1332 of the Civil Code 2, 11


    Article 1359 of the Civil Code 3, 11

    Article 1431 of the Civil Code 18

    Article 1458 of the Civil Code 9

    Article 1602 of the Civil Code 2, 10

    Article 175 (1) of the Civil Code


    (now Article 126 (1) of the Family Code) 16

    Rule 131, Sec. 3 of the Rules of Court 14

    Section 127 of the Public Land Act. 3, 12

    S-ar putea să vă placă și