Sunteți pe pagina 1din 40

Structural Analysis & Design Report

A
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
REPORT
OF
THE PROPOSED BUILDING OF RESIDENTIAL

OWNER:
Mr. Diwas Kumar Jhimi

SUBMITTED TO:
Dharan Sub-Metropolitan city, Sunsari
Structural Analysis & Design Report

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

This report comprises the summary of the residential building of Mr. Diwas Kumar
Jhimi 16-Dharan Nepal. The reports consist of the design procedures adopted, the
assumptions made, the inputs made in the design and the design output. During the
design, it is assumed that the client will completely follow the architectural as well as the
structural design. It is also assumed that the construction will be supervised by
professional engineer.

The designer will not be responsible if any alterations to the structural system is made by
the client or the contractor without the prior written permission from the designer, or the
alterations to non-structural system is made such that the weight of each individual floor
or the weight of the whole building is altered by more than 10% of design weight of each
floor and the total weight.

The design calculations and derivations are limited to only a minimum to let the
concerned people know the methodology adopted. However, the calculations may be
provided to the client or concerned authorities when needed, upon request. Hence the
building is safe.

1
Structural Analysis & Design Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS

S.N. Title Page


No.
1 Introduction 3

2 Salient features 3

3 Design Approach and Methodology 6

4 Preliminary Design 8

5 Final Analysis 9

6 Design Methodology 11

7 Analysis Output 13

8 Design of Members 20

2
Structural Analysis & Design Report

1.0 Background
This report summarizes structural analysis and design of the Residential building for
Dharan Sub-Metro politician City. The analysis and design has been based on the
prevailing codes that are in practice in Nepal, the National Building Code of Nepal and
the IS codes at places.

2.0 Salient Features


2.1 Project Information:
Owner : Mr. Diwas Kumar Jhimi
Building Type : Residential Building
Location : Dharan-16
Plot no. :
Land Area :
Plinth Area :

2.2 Building Features:


Type of Structure: RCC Framed Structure
Storey: 2-Storey
Storey Height: 3.048m
Total Height: 6.096 m

2.3 Site Condition:


Soil Type: III (for seismic consideration as per NBC 105)
Seismic Zone Factor: 1.0
Safe Bearing Capacity: 150 KN/m2 (assumed)

3
Structural Analysis & Design Report

2.4 Material Specification:


Considering Architectural, Economic and strength demands reinforced cement concrete
(RCC) is used as the major structural material. The selected material also confirms the
availability and ease in construction. The concrete grade used is M20 as per Indian
Standard Specification. This material provides minimum grade of structural concrete and
favorable for easy production and quality control as well.
Fe 500 is provided as longitudinal and shear reinforcing in Beams, Columns, foundations,
and slabs wherever RCC is used.

Considerations of material for loading and strength parameter are as detailed below:

Structural Components:
Concrete:
Grade: M20
Characteristic Compressive Strength: 20 N/mm2
Unit Weight: 25.0 KN/m3
Youngs Modulus of Elasticity (E): = 5000 fck N/mm2
22360680 KN/m2 (for M20)
Steel Reinforcement:
Grade: Fe 500 (for both longitudinal and shear reinforcement)

Non-Structural Components:
Brick wall:
Unit Weight: 18.85 KN/m3
Strength: Not Available

Finishing:
Plaster:
Unit Weight: 20.4 KN/m3
Flooring: Screed + Punning
Unit Weight per meter: 1.2 KN/m2

4
Structural Analysis & Design Report

2.5 Loading Details


Number of Storey 2 Storey
Loading in General Structural Self Weight
(Gravity loads) Live Load for residential services
Dead load of finishing materials for floor
Panel walls 250mm & 125mm thick brick walls without openings
125mm thick brick walls with 30% openings
Partition walls 125mm thick (half brick) walls with 30 & 20% openings
Parapet walls 125 mm thick (half brick) wall height 0.8m
Live Load As per IS 875 Part II
Lateral Loading As per NBC 105:1994

 The loads distributed over the area are imposed on area element and that distributed
over length are imposed on line element whenever possible.
 Where such facility is not feasible, equivalent conversion to different loading
distribution is carried to load the Model near the real case as far as possible.
 For lateral load, necessary calculations were performed and checked using NBC 105:
1994 for response spectrum method.
 Different load combinations based on Nepal National Codes are developed and used
for design purposes.
Load Combinations:
The load combinations are based on NBC 105: 1994
Static Load Combination:
1.5 DL + 1.5 LL
Seismic Load Combinations:
1.25 EQ
1.0 DL + 1.3 LL
0.9 DL 1.25 EQ
For seismic loading, mass equivalent to the load that composed of 100% of Dead load and
25% of Live load is taken into consideration.
The Earthquake lateral loads were used in the combination from the Self-Generated Load
on the Seismic coefficient Method.
Modal analysis is carried out using FEM Based three dimensional analyses.
5
Structural Analysis & Design Report

3.0 Design Approach and Methodology:


3.1 Introduction
The structure is analyzed for full Finite Element. Beams and columns modeled as frame
(line) elements with five and three internal stations. All floor slabs are modeled as Shell
(Area) elements with sufficient and appropriate meshing. Modulus of elasticity and
Poissons ratio for used material i.e. M20 grade concrete (as per Indian Specification) are
taken accordingly and section properties used are based on Preliminary section sizing
with consideration for deflection, minimum size specified and serviceability.
Computation for stiffness as a whole is carried out using FEM based latest software.
Full Modal Analysis is carried out up to twelve modes confirming more than 95 %
seismic mass participation and it is applied for lateral seismic force distribution that
generated with NBC 105 based Spectral Function for Soil Type-III.
For Section Design and Check, suitable Load combinations as suggested in
NBC105:1994 and if not covered in that, IS 1893- 2002 is referred with consideration of
Envelopes of internal Forces developed.
Foundation design is carried out to satisfy strength and stability requirements.
3.2 Software used: (Introduction to Analysis software)

The analysis for the structural system was carried out using ETABS 2016 ver 16.0.0
is a product of computers and structures Inc, Berkeley. It is a FEM based software
having facility of RC Design based on IS-456:2000

3.3 Structural Performance:

Structural response under limit state of serviceability is thoroughly checked. The force
and stiffness relationship resulting the deflection under various load cases and combined
action of forces are duly evaluated. Basically short-term elastic deflection due to vertical
loads and lateral deflection due to seismic forces are of major importance along with the
long-term deflection of beam elements under sustained loading condition due to
shrinkage and creep are also taken into account.

3.4 Deformation under Vertical Loads:

6
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Maximum vertical deflection in all components that resulted under vertical load of
combined effect of self, imposed dead and live load are checked for every element and
maintained to be within permissible limit. Short-term elastic deflection and long-term
deflection due to shrinkage and creep due to sustained loads also are maintained within
permissible limits for all the elements.

3.5 Deformation under Lateral Loads:

Effect of lateral load due to seismic force is analyzed using self-generated seismic load
compatible with Codal provision. The distribution of lateral force at different parts of the
structure is done based on the response under unit force. Using Complete Quadratic
Combination (CQC) method of modal combination combines the deformations, and
related forces reported.

3.6 Recommendations:
The following recommendations are made:
Materials used shall confirm minimum standard specified before use. Primarily the
cement, aggregate, sand and steel shall be used that confirms to NS or IS standard.
Batching, mixing, placing and curing of concrete and steel fabrication and placing
shall be done as per standard practice.
Construction safety shall be well planned and implemented.

7
Structural Analysis & Design Report

4.0 Preliminary Design


The Preliminary Design was done using the prevailing thumb rules and span
consideration.
Slab: The slab is designed based on IS456:2000. The slab is designed to meet the
deflection criteria for the slab.
Beam: The beam is designed based on IS456:2000. The slab is preliminarily designed to
meet the deflection criteria as well as the moment requirements for the span.
Column: The column is preliminarily designed to meet the stiffness criteria for the
building.
Staircase: The staircase is designed to satisfy the moment requirement as well as the
deflection criteria.

The sizes of the structural components are as given below:


Sizes of Structural Components:
Slab: 5 thick RCC (M20) Slab

Beam: Rectangular Beams size- 10 X 15 (BXD)

Column: Square, size- 12X 12 (HXB)

Staircase: Waist Slab 5 thick

8
Structural Analysis & Design Report

5.0 Final Analysis


5.1 Load Calculations:
Refer Table: Load Intensity of Building Components
Live Load: 2.0 KN/m2 (for all rooms)
Live Load: 3 KN/m2 (for staircases and lobbies)
Roof Live Load: 1.5 KN/m2 (for roof accessible), 0.75 KN/m2 (for roof inaccessible)

5.2 Seismic Lump Load:


Seismic weight: Comprises Dead Load+ 25% of Live Load (as per IS Code for live load
intensity 3 KN/m2)
Seismic wt. at ith floor level (WI) = (Total dead load of all components i.e. Beam, Slab,
Columns And Walls for height above and height below the floor level + 25% of live
load)
n
Total Weight of the frame, W= Wi Where, n = total number of storey
I=1

Seismic Wt. of Building W = 1494.7605 KN

Base Shear Calculation:


As Per NBC 105:
Total Horizontal Base Shear V= Cd W
Where, Cd = CZIK
Where,
Basic Shear Factor (C) = According to time period of vibration and Soil type
Seismic Zoning Factor (Z) = For Dharan
Importance Factor (I) = According to the type of building
Performance Factor (K) = for the moment resisting frame

Distribution of design seismic force:


Fi = Design Seismic Force at floor Level I
Wi = seismic wt. at ith floor level
hi = height of floor i measured from base
According to NBC 105:1994
Height of building (h) = 6.096 m

9
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Soil type = III


Time period (T) = 0.06 H0.75
= 0.233 Sec
C = 0.08 (from Fig 8.1 of NBC105:1994)
Z = 1.00 (for Dharan, Fig 8.2 of NBC105:1994)
I = 1.0 (for Residential Bldg., Table 8.1 of NBC105:1994)
K = 1.00 (for Ductile Moment resisting Frame, Table 8.2 of
NBC105:1994)
Cd = CZIK
= 0.08
Total Horizontal Base shear Vx = Vy = 0.08*1494.7605
Total Horizontal Base shear Vx = Vy = 119.5808 KN

5.3 Load Cases:


Dead : Self Weight of the building structural components (Beams, columns and slabs)
Finish : Weight of the finishing of the slabs as well as staircases (including steps).
Wall : Wall loads (inclusive of plaster)
Live : Live load in the building area elements.
Rlive : Live load in the terraces both accessible and inaccessible (not including in
seismic behaviour)
EQX : Spectral Seismic Load in X Direction
EQY : Spectral Seismic Load in Y Direction

5.4 Load Combination:


DL = 1.5Dead + 1.5Finish + 1.5 Wall + 1.5 Rlive + 1.5Live
DQX = 0.9 Dead + 0.9 Wall + 0.9 Finish 1.25 EQX
DQY = 0.9 Dead + 0.9 Wall + 0.9 Finish 1.25 EQY
DLEQX = 1.0 Dead + 1.0Wall + 1.0 Finish + 1.3 Live 1.25 EQX
DLEQY= 1.0 Dead + 1.0 Wall + 1.0 Finish + 1.3 Live 1.25 EQY

10
Structural Analysis & Design Report

6.0 Design of Structural Members


6.1 Design Assumptions:
Foundation
The Safe Bearing Capacity (SBC) of the soil is taken to be 150 KN/m2. The depth of the
foundation is taken as 1.67 m. It is assumed that the soil below is converted to a firm
base by sufficient compaction through any convenient means or as directed by the site
engineer.

Beam:
The beams are assumed to be rectangular. The preliminary design of the beam is carried
out considering the deflection criteria as well as the loading condition.

Slab:
The longest span slab is designed and for uniformity in construction, all the slabs are
detailed according to the designed slab. The slab is designed based on IS 456:2000, for
adjacent edge discontinuous. However during detailing, the torsion in the free edges is
considered.

6.2 Design Methodology:


The design of beams and columns that are the structural components in the building are
carried out using the results and analysis for critical responses and also checking with
manual calculations is carried out. The design of the foundation is carried out based on
the base reactions as obtained from the software with necessary adjustments. The design
of slabs and staircases are carried out based on the prevailing design practices, following
the codal provisions.

6.2 Calculation of Wall Loads.


The calculations of the loads are given in the following tables:

Load Intensity of Wall


10Thickness of wall
Full wall intensity
=15.0 KN/M

11
Structural Analysis & Design Report

20% opening Wall intensity


=12.0KN/M
30% opening Wall intensity
=10.5KN/M

5Thickness of wall
Full wall intensity
=7.50 KN/M
20% opening Wall intensity
=6.0 KN/M
30% opening Wall intensity
=5.2 KN/M

Parapet 5wall
Parapet wall
=2.2KN/M

12
Structural Analysis & Design Report

7.0 ANALYSIS OUTPUT


Result from Structural models and analysis

3D Model of the Building

13
Structural Analysis & Design Report

JOINT REACTIONS

14
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Design Plan (Ground Floor)

15
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Design Plan (First Floor)

16
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Shear Force Diagram (Sample only)

17
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Axial Force Diagram (Sample only)

18
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Bending Moment Diagram (Sample only)

19
Structural Analysis & Design Report

8.0 Design of Members


Design of Beams and Columns

The design of beams and columns are done from the software itself. However, it is to be
notified that the limitations of the design by the software have been evaluated and the
adjustments have been made accordingly. The samples (summary) of the design through
the software based on IS456: 2000 has been presented hereunder.

Output for the Reinforcement Area (Beams and Columns)

Grid -1

20
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Grid 2

Grid 3

21
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Grid 4

Grid A

22
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Grid B

Grid C

23
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Grid D

Grid E

24
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Story-1

25
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Story-2

26
Structural Analysis & Design Report

9.0 Summary

9.1 Column Design


Different Column Sections and required longitudinal reinforcements are tabulated below:
Table 8-1: Column Design Summary
Nod Colu Column size GF FF
e No mn Area of % Area of %
rebar rebar
mm2 inches Req Provi Req Provi
d. ded d. ded
All C1 9000 12x12 768 1256 1.4 743 904 1
0

9.2 Beam Design


Two different beam sections used in the buildings are tabulated below. The reinforcement
shall be as specified in the drawings.
Table 8-2: Beam Sections
Sn Designation Size Top Rebar Bottom Rebar
1 Beam 10 x 15
-Beam G.F. 10 x 15 2-16mm (T)+1-12mm 2-16mm (T)+1-12mm
(E) (T)
-Beam 1st Fl. 10 x 15 3-12mm (T) 3-12mm (T)
2 Secondary Beam 10 x 13 3-12mm (T) 3-12mm (T)
3 Tie Beam 10 x 13 3-12mm (T) 3-12mm (T)

27
Structural Analysis & Design Report

4 Strap Beam
All 12x18 4-16mm (T) 2-16mm (T)+1-12mm
(T)

9.3 Slab Design


The final output of the slab is presented below. The construction shall follow the details
provided in slab drawing.

Table 8-3: Slab basic data


Slab Thickness 125 mm
Main bars (bottom): 8@ 150mm c/c
Main bars (top): 8@ 150mm c/c (x-dir)
8@ 150mm c/c (y-dir)
Dist. Bars: 8@ 150mm c/c

9.4 Staircase Design


The output of the design of staircase is presented below. The construction shall follow the
detail drawing of the staircase.

Table 8-4: Staircase basic data


Staircase Thickness 125 mm
Main bars (bottom): 12@ 180mm c/c
Main bars (top): 12@ 180mm c/c
Dist. Bars: 8@ 150mm c/c

9.5 Footing Design


The output of the design of footing is presented below. The construction shall follow the
detail drawing of footing.

Node No. Footing Footing Rebar Concrete Edge Footing


Size Footing Depth Depth
Depth From
Ground
Level
Expect 9 F1/F1a 50X50 12@ 150mm 16 8 5-6
c/c both
direction
9 F2 56X56 12@ 150mm 16 8 5-6
c/c both
direction

28
Structural Analysis & Design Report

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design


IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)


Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 B12 12 Beam 10X15 DCon9 4114.8 4267.2 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
254 381 254 0 25 25

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters


C S
1.5 1.15

Factored Forces and Moments


Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-61.2273 2.014E-06 81.0994 0.9495

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt


Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-61.2273 2.962E-06 0 -61.2273

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu


Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm mm mm mm
Top (+2 Axis) -61.2273 429 0 429 208
Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 215 0 0 215

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu


Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm/m

29
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s


kN kN kN kN mm/m
102.1428 42.3655 59.7773 32.5077 465.3

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2


Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm/m
1.947E-06 81.0941 224 351 0

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design


IS 456:2000 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)


Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 C11 45 Col 12X12 DCon11 0 3048 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
304.8 304.8 56 30

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters


C S
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3


Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm %
108.1482 -3.5558 38.808 2.163 2.163 768 0.83

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors


K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.72327 2667 15.5232 0 2.163
Minor Bend(M2) 0.719478 2667 -2.3899 0 2.163

30
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3


Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm/m
Major, Vu2 23.0033 42.9321 30.3333 19.9266 337.85
Minor, Vu3 18.0388 42.932 30.3333 18.0388 337.85

Joint Shear Check/Design


Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio


Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)


Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm cm kN kN kN Unitless
929 7.7 1124.0178 309.4535 108.1482 1

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)


Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.875 304.8 6.329 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.875 304.8 6.295 12 No 0

Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed

31
Structural Analysis & Design Report

DESIGN OF FLOOR SLAB


Design Data
2
Dimensions of the slab (c/c distance b/w supports), fck = 20 N/mm
2
Length of short span, Lx = 4.27 m fy = 500 N/mm
Length of long span, Ly = 4.42 m
Width of the supporting beam, = 230 mm
Clear cover to main reinforcement = 20 mm
Assume dia. of reinforcement steel = 8 mm

Calculations
Assume the thickness of slab as 125 mm ; Effective depth, d = 101 mm
Effective span, = 4.138
lx = 4.26699177080158 m (or) 4.138 m whichever isd less; m
ly = 4.42 m (or) 4.291 m whichever is less; d = 4.291 m
(ly / lx ) = 1.04 < 2 ; Here, (ly / lx ) is less than 2, Hence design the slab as two way slab

Load Calculations
Dead Load of slab = 0.125 x 25 = 3.13 KN/m 2 Dust Load on slab = 0 KN/m
2

Finishes load on slab = 1.20 KN/m 2 Other load on slab = 0 KN/m


2

Live Load on slab = 2.0 KN/m 2


Total Dead load acting on the Structure = 4.33 KN/m 2
Total live load acting on the Structure = 2.0 KN/m 2
2
Factored Design Load w = 9.50 KN/m

Support Condition (Type of panel according to support condition)


Two Adjacent Edges Discontinuous For this support condition,
Short span coefficient for (ly / lx ) = 1.04, Long span coefficient,
For negative moment, ax = 0.0494 For negative moment, ay = 0.047
For positive moment, ax = 0.0370 For positive moment, ay = 0.035

Moment Calculation
Max. BM per unit width, Mx = ax w l x 2 & My = ay w l x 2
2 2
Mu Mu / bd pt Ast, req Ast , min = (0.12/100) bD = 150 mm
2 2
KNm N/mm % mm
For Short Span,
Reinforcement details
At mid span, 6.02 0.59 0.1695 171
At supports, 8.04 0.79 0.2299 232 Provide Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
For Long span, supports for short span (Ast pro. =335 mm 2 )
At mid span, 5.69 0.66 0.1904 192 Provide Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
At supports, 7.65 0.88 0.2577 260 supports for long span (Ast pro. = 335 mm 2 )

Check for Deflection


Percentage of tension reinforcement = 0.33 %
fs = 0.58 fy (Ast req / Ast pro) = 148
Refer Fig. 4 of IS 456,
Modification factor = 1.6
Allowable (Span / deff ) ratio = 41.6
Effective depth required = 99 mm
< d prov.
Hence OK

32
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Design of isolated foundation


Pleft(X)(unfactored) 373.00 KN Area req 2.74
KN Width prov 1.68
Soil bearing 150 KN/mm2 Total Length 1.63
Cent Col Size 0.3 m provided length 1.676
Cornor Col Size 0.3 m Left Projection
Dist betw. Col. Center to center m Right Projection

CG/from Left of0Force


Max P 559.5 m
2
Net upward soil pressure = 199.18 KN/m Check Value 0.3
m
BENDING MOMENT about x-x passing through the face of the column
79.01 KN/m maxim projection
0.000
d calculated from moments = 130.69 mm

Check for two way shear ok

D= 450 Ast mim.= 792.4128


2
d= 394 mm mm

2
6.489 Ast 171390 Ast 79008343.68 =0

2 2
Ast at bottom 469.32 mm 792.41 mm

12 dia spacing = 239.00 provide spacing 150


= mm

Grade of concrete M 20
Check for one way shear
at d distance (Vu)= 98.15 kN
Nominal shear stress(Tv)= 0.15 N/mm2
% of tension steel p = 12 dia 0.19
shear strength of M20 concrete for above % steel = 0.31 Ok for 12 dia.
Check for two way shear

concreate capacity = 1222842.97 N


From load = 463566.34 N
check ok

Development length
Ld= 679.69 mm
Ld available 728 > 679.69
Ok

33
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Project info:
Diwas Kumar Jhimi
Data: Status of designe:
Exterior column load [KN].unfactored = 200 TRUE
Interior column load [KN].unfactored = 373.333 .
Load factor = 1
Distance between column center lines[m] = 4.42
Depth of foundation Df [m] = 0.35
Allowable bearing capacity of soil [KN/sq.m] = 150
Width of ext. col. In strap beam direction [m] = 0.3
Width of ext. col. In direct perpendicular strap beam [m] = 0.3
Width of int. col. In strap beam direction [m] = 0.3
Width of int. col. In direct perpendicular strap beam [m] = 0.3
Breadth of strap beam [m] = 0.3
Eccentricity of exterior load from footing [m] = 0.575
R.C designation : Fcu [N/sq.mm] = 20
reinf. Strength : Fy [N/sq.mm] = 500
density of soil [KN/cu.m] 19
Calculation:
reaction of ext.footing R1 229.91 [KN]
geo. reaction of ext.footing R1T 240.57 [KN]
Req. ext. footing 1.60 [sq.m] Dim. sq 1.26642

reaction of int.footing R2 343.42 [KN]


geo. reaction of int.footing R2T 359.36 [KN]
Req. int. footing 2.40 [sq.m] Dim. sq 1.54781

Use dimensions for ext.footing L= 1.45 [m] Area prov.d 2.10 131%
B= 1.45 [m] in strap direction

Use dimensions for int.footing L= 1.676 [m] Area prov.d 2.81 117%
B= 1.676 [m] in strap direction
check dim TRUE

Design of strap beam:


Breadth of strap beam [m] 0.3
depth of strap beam from shear d 318.43 [mm]
Use depth d 400 [mm] TRUE
total depth H 450 [mm]
fcu = 20 N/smm fy = 500 N/smm

Width = 300 mm Max. B.M. Mu = 96 kNm


Depth = 400 mm Max. S.F. Vu = 171 kN
Mu = 72 kNm
2 2 2
K = M/bd fcu = 0.14 N/mm A's required 0.00 mm
2
Z = 275.34 mm As required 802.65 Top mm As prvd. 100%
2 2
As bottom = 500.00 mm As provided 803 Top mm TRUE
2
Design shear v= 1.68 N/mm Diameter of stirrups 8 mm No. legs 2
2
Design concrete shear vc = 0.61 N/mm Spacing of stirrups reqd. 273 mm
check shear at col face TRUE

34
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Design of exterior footing:


Net presure under ext. footing 121.60 [KN/sq.m] TRUE

fcu 20 N/smm fy 500 N/smm

Ult. column load 229.91 [KN] Safe bearing capacity 150 [KN/sq.m]
Self weight 36.79 [KN] Overburden height -0.2 m A prvd.
2
Overburden -11.04 [KN] Area of footing reqd. 1.18 m TRUE
2
Total load 255.66 [KN] Area of footing provided 2.10 m L reqd.
Net upward pressure ult. 121.60 [KN/sq.m] Footing thickness 500 [mm] 0.81
Short span Long span B/W
Width B= 1.45 m Length L= 1.45 m 1.00
Column width 300.00 mm Column breadth 300 mm
Max. cantilever proj. 1.15 m Max. cantilever proj. 0.58 m As min
Max. B.M. /m width 80.41 kNm Max. B.M. /m width 20 kNm 577

2 2 2 2
K = M/bd fcu 0.022 N/mm K = M/bd fcu 0.005 N/mmNo. of bars
Z 410.40 mm Z 422 mm 9
As required /m width 450.41 [mm] As required /m width 110 [sq.mm] 9
Diameter of bars 12 [mm] Diameter of bars 12 [mm]
Spacing of bars 150 [mm] Number of bars/side 150 [mm] As prvd. TRUE
As provided/m width 754 [sq.mm] As provided/m width 754 [sq.mm] 167%
688%
Punch shear 0.00 [KN] Dist. to critical section 575 [mm]
Punch shear stress 0.00 [N/sq.mm] Shear force 70 [KN]
Allow.shear stress 0.35 [N/sq.mm] Shear stress 0.16 [N/sq.mm] TRUE

35
Structural Analysis & Design Report

Design of interior footing:


Net presure under int. footing 134.51 [KN/sq.m] TRUE

fcu 20 N/smm fy 500 N/smm

Ult. column load 343.42436 [KN] Safe bearing capacity 150 [KN/sq.m]
Self weight 44 [KN] Overburden height -0.1 m A prvd.
2
Overburden -10 [KN] Area of footing reqd. 1.74 m TRUE
2
Total load 378 [KN] Area of footing provided 2.81 m L reqd.
Net upward pressure ult. 135 [KN/sq.m] Footing thickness 450 [mm] 1.04
Short span Long span B/W
Width B= 1.68 m Length L= 1.68 m 1.00
Column width 300 mm Column breadth 300 mm
Max. cantilever proj. 0.69 m Max. cantilever proj. 0.69 m As min
Max. B.M. /m width 32 kNm Max. B.M. /m width 32 kNm 512

2 2 2 2
K = M/bd fcu 0.011 N/mm K = M/bd fcu 0.010 N/mmNo. of bars
Z 363 mm Z 374 mm 11
As required /m width 202 [mm] As required /m width 196 [sq.mm] 11
Diameter of bars 12 [mm] Diameter of bars 12 [mm]
Spacing of bars 150 [mm] Number of bars/side 150 [mm] As prvd. TRUE
As provided/m width 754 [sq.mm] As provided/m width 754 [sq.mm] 374%
386%
Punch shear 55 [KN] Dist. to critical section 344 [mm]
Punch shear stress 0.024 [N/sq.mm] Shear force 46 [KN]
Allow.shear stress 0.37 [N/sq.mm] Shear stress 0.12 [N/sq.mm] TRUE

36
Structural Analysis & Design Report

DESIGN OF DOG LEGGED STAIRCASE


Data
Internal Dimensions
Length = 4.419384 m
Width = 2.438281 m
Floor Height = 3.047851 m
Fck = 20 N/mm2
Fy = 500 N/mm2
Riser = 167.5 mm
Tread = 250 mm
Landing width = 1142.944 mm
Effective Span = 3.1 m
Height of each flight = 1.523926 m
No. of risers in each flight 9.098063 Nos
No. of Tread in each flight 8.098063 Nos

Design
d = 98 mm Required

D = 125 mm
d = 104 mm

Loads
2
DL of waist slab = 3.125 kN/m
DL on horizontal area = 3.76 kN/m2
DL of steps = 2.09375 kN/m2
LL = 3 kN/m2
FF = 1.2 kN/m2
Total load = 10.06 kN/m2
Factored load = 15.1 (of one flight)

BM and SF
Mu = 18 kN-m
Vu = 23 kN

d from BM consideration 81 mm

k = 1.675
pt = 0.432 %
Ast = 449 mm2

Main Reinforcement
Dia = 12 mm
Spacing = 251 mm

Distribution Steel
2
Ast = 125 mm

Dia of bar = 8 mm
Spacing = 400 mm

Development Length

Ld = Ld = ( x s) / (4 x Tbd)
Therefore, Ld = 1088 mm
Provide, Ld = 1090 mm

37
Structural Analysis & Design Report

List of design code and Standards


1. NBC-000-114:1994 : All relevant design codes in Nepal

2. IS 456 2000 : Code for practice for plain & Reinforced concrete

3. IS 875 1987 : Code of practice for Design Loads (other than


Earthquake load for building & structures.

4. IS 1893(part-I)-2002 : Code of practice for earthquake resist design of


Structures.

5. IS 13920 1993 : Code of practice for Ductile detailing of


Reinforced
Concrete structures subjected to seismic forces.

6. SP: 16 1980 : Design aids for Reinforced concrete to IS 456 -

1978

7. ETABS 2016 V 16.0.0 : Proprietary program of Research Engineer

38
Structural Analysis & Design Report

39

S-ar putea să vă placă și