Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Garland, TX
Written By:
Bryan Pepper
Ted Aikman
For:
New Product Development, IR Drilling Solutions
Aquila Mining Systems, LTD
Date:
20 Mar 2004
Revision History:
1 References ________________________________________________________________________2
2 Introduction _______________________________________________________________________2
3 Hardware Design___________________________________________________________________2
3.1 Design Constraints_____________________________________________________________2
3.2 Head Detection Sensors_________________________________________________________3
4 Software Design ___________________________________________________________________4
4.1 Interlocks ____________________________________________________________________4
4.1.1 Added Interlocks____________________________________________________________4
4.1.2 Interlock Priority____________________________________________________________4
4.1.3 Automatic Rod Catcher_______________________________________________________4
4.1.4 Affected Interlocks/Faults_____________________________________________________5
4.2 Switch Faults _________________________________________________________________5
4.3 Rod Support__________________________________________________________________6
1
1 References
The following software configuration files were used as references. (Refer to latest
versions.)
FaultCtrlAngle.cfg, FaultCtrlCompressor.cfg, FaultCtrlFeed.cfg, FaultCtrlIndex.cfg,
FaultCtrlJack.cfg, FaultCtrlLube.cfg, FaultCtrlPropel.cfg, FaultCtrlState.cfg,
FaultCtrlSwing.cfg, FaultCtrlTower.cfg, FaultCtrlVert.cfg,
FaultCtrlWater.cfg, FaultCtrlWrench.cfg, FaultDCU.cfg, FaultECM.cfg,
FaultFilter.cfg, FaultPower.cfg, FaultStop.cfg, FaultTempSensor.cfg
2 Introduction
The Pit Viper 351 drill contains many sensing devices within the tower. These
sensors detect the position of the rotary head, carousel, rod support, and tower pins.
The resulting data is sent to the central computer to control interlocks and to provide
important information to the operator.
When compared with other large blasthole drills, the Pit Viper has several notable
differences in rotary head detection:
Sensor Quantity: The Pit Viper has many more interlocks. Naturally, more
interlocks created a need for more tower sensors.
Sensor Type: The Pit Viper uses a combination of inductive proximity switches
and traditional mechanical limit switches.
3 Hardware Design
2
3.2 Head Detection Sensors
The system will contain five head position switches. A summary of the design layout
is shown in Table A, Switch Layout.
Based on the constraints of Section 4.1, the sensor layout results in the following:
SW2 and SW3 will function as upper deceleration switches. The switches will be
limit switch style and will detect the travelling sheave carriage, both switches will
trigger simultaneously. Both switches will be wired normally closed.
SW4 will trigger the automatic rod catcher open/close functionality and calibrate
the Aquila DM-0 system. The switch will be limit switch style and will detect the
travelling sheave carriage. The switch will be wired normally open.
SW5 and SW6 will function as rod catcher protection switches. The switches will
be limit switch style and will detect the travelling sheave carriage, both switches
will trigger simultaneously. Both switches will be wired normally closed.
3
4 Software Design
4.1 Interlocks
4
4.1.4 Affected Interlocks/Faults
The faults listed below are current faults that will be affected or deleted based on the
new design.
5
4.3 Rod Support
To insure proper automatic operation and functional interlocks, the switches on the rod
support shall be monitored relative to proper sequence and relationship.
The following matrix indicates acceptable states:
Jaw closed Arm closed Arm open
1 1 0
0 1 0
0 0 1