Sunteți pe pagina 1din 100

No. No.

RFI Statements

According to the D-Wall detail drawing for type 4, we


need information related to the dimensions that can be
1 001/RFI/IPR-FSJ/XII/2015 used for shop drawing D-Wall type 4 if using the D-Wall
plan or the section 4 because there's a difference. The
thickness 1.00 m or 1.20 m ?

We need information about the length of the


embedment starter bar column inside the D-Wall ( in
2 002/RFI/IPR-FSJ/I/2016 construction drawing only the information for the
amount of rebar) How long is the length of embedment
starter bar column?

Column Demolishion or Reposition D-Wall Type 7A due


3 003/RFI/IPR-FSJ/I/2016 to the limit space for D-Wall Construction

4 004/RFI/IPR-FSJ/I/2016 Kingpost's Stud Bolt and Kingpost's shifting tollerance

5 005/RFI/IPR-FSJ/I/2016 Increasing Bentonite Slurry's Viscocity

6 006/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016 Kingpost Section's Length

Rebar Amount and Overlapping Length for Rebar Cage


7 007/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016 TP-5
Reposition theTest Pile location for TP-3 from BP-315 to
8 008/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016 BP-312

9 009/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016

10 010/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016

11 011/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016

12 012/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2006

13 013/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016 1. Installing settlement marker or settlement plate ?

2. Do we allowed to install settlement marker on the


raft?
Ask for confimation about the depth of observation well
14 014/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016 31.05 m from top 2nd layer shotcrete or from B1 level
-5.400

Ask for the site instruction for extracting pile. Based on


contract already finish 10 nos (no:
15 015/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016 1,3,49,37,50,60,51,38,59,58). Please issue the SI for no:
2,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,35,36,3
9, 40, 41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,53,55,56,57,61,62

1. Switch the pile testing method TP-3 and TP-4 due to


16 016/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016 the site condition.

2. Asking for the CSL location

Please issue the revision of lap splice of bored pile


17 017/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016 section details (G-S-100B) based on standard detail sheet
1 (SD-S-002).

18 018/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016

019/RFI/IPR-FSJ
RFI SUMMARIES

Responses Attachment

Refer to email dated 22 December. 'As discussed,


please find attached the updated D-Wall plan (sheet G-
S-106) with revision in the thickness of D-Wall type 4 D-Wall Detail Drawing and D-Wall
grid I7 (link area) to 1.00 m wherein previous layout of Detail Drawing
D-Wall in the area will not be affected. The attached
autocad drawing sheet no. G-S-106 supersedes the
previous drawing issue.

Rebar anchorage for column (except the office tower


columns) is from the capping beam only.

Detail RFI Drawing for Column

For construction Drawing G-S-106


and Zoom at Position

Detail RFI Drawing For Kingpost

For Construction Drawing of Test Pile


Rebar

1. Please install settlement marker not settlement plate


2. the settlement marker to be installed at existig
structures such as existing drainage & building raft
foundation
3. Please provide shop drawing

31.05 m from B1 Level -5.400 and need to provide shop Layout dewatering drawing
drawing

RFI Drawing (superimpossed bored


Refer to SI No 008 pile, d-wall, and the latest updated
existing pile drawing

1. TP-4 will be kantledge and TP 3 will be PDA Bored pile plan layout

2. Residence 19 Location, Link 1 location, Office 12


Location
Submittal Date Recieved Date Admission Date

###

###

###

Friday, January 08, 2016

###

###

###

###
###

###
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 001/RFI/IPR-FSJ/XII/2015


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : December 21st 2015

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. According to the D-Wall detail drawing for Type 4, we need the information related to the
dimensions that can be used for shop drawing D-wall type 4 if using the D-Wall plan or
the section 4 because there's a difference.

Attachment : D-Wall detail drawing (Sheet G-S-115) and D-Wall Plan Drawing
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 002/RFI/IPR-FSJ/I/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : January 5th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. We need the information about the length of embedment starter bar column inside
the D-Wall (in the for construction drawing there's only the information for the amount of
rebar).
How long is length of embedment starter bar column?

Attachment : Detail RFI Drawing For Column


Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 003/RFI/IPR-FSJ/I/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : January 5th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. We need the information related to the position of D-Wall type


7A in Grid DH. According to the for construction drawing, ' the
space between the existing column and the D-Wall plan
position is 17 cm and based on actual condition in site is 20 'cm.
For constructing D-Wall We need space about 50 cm - 60 'cm.
We need information wether the column could be 'demolished
or reposition the D-Wall.

Attachment : For construction Drawing G-S-106 and Zoom at Position


Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 004/RFI/IPR-FSJ/I/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : January 8th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. According to the for construction drawing of kingpost, We ask that the stud bolt
on top of Kingpost will not installed during the Kingpost's Installation because it will
disturb the installation method / installation process.

2 For the tolerance of installed Kingpost, We propose the tolerance for shifting of
top Kingpost's elevation (vertical shifting) is +/- 15 cm and for the horizontal shifting is
20 cm from the axis point of Kingpost.

Attachment : Detail RFI Drawing For Kingpost


Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 005/RFI/IPR-FSJ/I/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : January 12th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. Since there's no technical specification for betonite slurry used for bore pilling in the
specs. booklet we follow the specification for D-Wall at section B.4. The viscocity of our
fresh bentonite is 33 s, and the bentonite viscocity as supplied to the bore hole is 32 s.

However, despite we follow the technical specification on the mixture of bentonite


slurry the soil collapse had occured at the sand strata located at 25 meters from
top of borehole with a collapse height of 4 meters.

We recommend to increase the viscocity of the bentonite as follows:


- For the the fresh bentonite will be 40-44 s
- For the the bentonite as supplied to bore hole We suggest 35-40 s
- For the the fresh bentonite We suggest 35-44 s.
by increasing the number of bentonite to the mixture and control the pH of water.

Attachment :
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 006/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 2nd 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. Based on the latest shop drawing that has been approved with comment, the king post
length is 14 m. The maximum length for H-Beam is 12 m. So we are going to ask the
sub-con to joint 12 m with 2m length H-Beam with the 12m length H-Beam for the
upper part and the 2m length H-Beam for the lower part. We need information wether this
condition will be fine for the structure.

Attachment :
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 007/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 5th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. For TP-05 rebar (tension) PT. Indopora needs confirmation from the consultant whether the
rebar amout based on the for construction drawing (42-D32) and the length of rebar
overlapping based on for construction drawing (880 mm) enough to resist the tension force
(200% x 810 kN). Isn't it better if the length of rebar overlapping 40D (40x steel rebar dia. ~
1280 mm)

We need the confirmation from the consultan about the rebar amount before we drill and
cast the pile of TP-05

Attachment : For construction drawing of test pile rebar


Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 008/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 5th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. For TP-03 location, we ask for remove the test pile location from BP-315 to BP-312
because the test pile location is on the edge of the slope in STP Area.

Attachment :
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 009/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 11th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. We are asking for positioning the inclinometer, waterstandpipe and settlement marker.
Herewith we attach the D-Wall layout so that we could know the instrumentation positioning
- For inclinometer, in which panel do we can install the inclinometer?
- For waterstandpipe and settlement marker, in which point do we can install the
instrumentation?

2 In BQ, there're mentioned that we should install 7 nos inclinometer, 4 nos water standpipe,&
14 nos settlement marker. But in the spec by gistama mentioned that the number for
installing instrumentation are : 3 nos inclinometer, 4 nos waterstandpipe, and 14 nos
settlement marker. So, we need confirmation about the fix number for installing
instrumentation.

Attachment :
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 010/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 15th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. PT. Indopora has started casting the pile on January 15th 2016. As of February 10th 2016,
PT. Indopora has completed in casting 7 piles that 4 of them are test pile. The piles'
number are :
i BP-123 : Casted on January 15th 2016
ii BP-20 : Casted on January 17th 2016
iii BP-37 : Casted on January 25th 2016 (Test Pile TP-01) / Residence Tower Area)
iv BP-72 : Casted on January 29th 2016
v BP-142 : Casted on January 30th 2016 (Test Pile TP-02 / Residence Tower Area)
vi BP-280 : Casted on February 6th 2016 (Test Pile TP-04 / Office Tower Area)
vii BP-322 : Casted on February 11th 2016 (Test Pile TP-03 / Office Tower Area)

For the rebar casting we used the rebar based on for construction drawing G-S-100B and shop
drawing IPR.SD.FSJ.BP-DS.01.

We ask whether we are going to test the casted test pile or not because we got the
confirmation based on our RFI No. 007/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016 dated February 12th 2016 that
there's a change for lapping length of rebar cage.

Indopora will not take responsibility for the structural and geotechnical failure for these
mentioned piles.

Attachment :
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 011/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 15th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. We are asking whether we should use swellable sealant for the capping beam or not
because the material is not mentioned in the for construction drawing

Attachment :
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 012/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 18th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. We are asking about the thickness of raft / pile cap B5 at office tower area we have to know
the cut of level of the pile

2 We are asking about the thickness of raft / pile cap at Residence Tower Area because
in the old drawing (G-S-100A / dated December 3rd 2015) thre're mentioned the raft thickness
but in the new drawing G-S-100A / dated February 16th 2016) there're not mentioned.

Attachment :
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 013/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 19th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. In the spec there's the spesification for settlement marker, but in the dewatering layout plan
that you sent via email to us on February 15th 2016 there're mention settlement plate.
Which one should we install? Settlement plate or settlement marker?

2 In the email dated February 15th 2016 you also mentioned that the settlement markers should
be installed on the capping beam of D-wall; and on the existing structures as shown in
the attached drawing. If we follow the spec and install the settlement marker in the existing
structure, the settlement marker will be installed in the raft of existing building but in the spec
mentioned thet the rod for settlement marker should be set in the concrete.
Please correct our statement, but if it's right do we allowed to install it in the raft?

Attachment :
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 014/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 24th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. Based on the layout dewatering drawing (G-S-100D), we are asking about the depth of
observation well for installing water standpipe. Is it correct that the depth is 31.05 m from the top
of 2nd layer existing shotcrete ? Or 31.05 m from the B1 level -5.400?

Attachment :
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 015/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 25th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. As of February 24th 2016, we have completed extracting 10 piles which is mentioned in the
in the contract. In the attached drawing the piles' number are :
1. No. 1 6. No. 60
2. No. 3 7. No. 51
3. No. 49 8. No. 38
4. No. 37 9. No. 59
5. No. 50 10. No. 58

The attached drawing shows the existing pile layout which already superimposed with the latest updated
bored pile plan layout.
- The green numbered without circle are the piles which have been inspected but have not been extracted
Number : 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48,
53, 55, 56, 57, 61, 62
- The green numbered with the circle are the piles which have been extracted
Number : 1, 3, 49, 37, 50, 60, 51, 38, 59, 58
- The red numbered are the piles which has not been inspected,
Number : 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 52, 54
- The blue numbered are the piles which will not extracted because the pile already shifted due to the new
bored pile plan layout.
Number: 7, 22, 23, 33, 34

So that, we ask for the site instruction based on the drawing to continue extracting the remained
existing pile. Please issue the site instruction to extract the balance 36 nos of existing piles.

Attachment : RFI drawing (superimposed bored pile, d-wall, and the latest updated existing pile drawing)

Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
: 015/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016
: February 25th 2016

sting pile layout which already superimposed with the latest updated

are the piles which have been inspected but have not been extracted
14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48,

ich will not extracted because the pile already shifted due to the new
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 016/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 25th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. For pile testing in Office Tower Area we ask for switching the kentledge and PDA test.
In the drawing mentioned that kentledge for TP-3 and PDA for TP-4. Now we are asking to hav
kentledge test for TP-4 and PDA for TP-3.

2. As of 25 Feb 2016 we have installed 6 nos sonic pipe and tested 5 nos of CSL
(Crosshole Sonic Loging) Test. There're :
i. BP-37 iv. BP-280
ii. BP-142 v. BP-322
iii. BP-72 vi. BP-178

In the spec mentioned that there're 10% of tower piles shall be


sonic logged (10% o 378 = 37.8 ~ 38 nos. Please issue the CSL test location for remained 32 n
Or, do we allow to determine the remained 32 nos?

Attachment
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
: 016/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016
: February 25th 2016

Area we ask for switching the kentledge and PDA test.


kentledge for TP-3 and PDA for TP-4. Now we are asking to have

8 ~ 38 nos. Please issue the CSL test location for remained 32 nos.

Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 017/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 25th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. Please issue the revision of lap splice of bored pile section details (G-S-100B) based
on standard detail sheet 1 (SD-S-002).

Attachment :
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
: 017/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016
: February 25th 2016

Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 018/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : February 25th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. In the construction drawing (G-S-106) mentioned that the thickness of the retaining wall in D-Wall Area Type : 5B,
5A, 8A, 8, 7, 9, 7A is 500 mm. But, in the section detail drawing (G-S-123) mentioned that the retaining wall
thickness is 300 mm and 350 mm. We are asking which one that we can use for shop drawing.

Attachment
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
: 018/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016
: February 25th 2016

mentioned that the thickness of the retaining wall in D-Wall Area Type : 5B,
he section detail drawing (G-S-123) mentioned that the retaining wall

Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 019/RFI/IPR-FSJ/III


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : March 4th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. Based on the shop drawing of D-Wall Plan along the existing building in Office Area (D-Wall Type 2 and Type 3)
which has been superimposed to the existing pile drawing we found that the ground anchor will obstruct the existing
pile. So, we are asking whether there will be any changes for the design of ground anchor.
If there will be any changes, please provide us the new construction drawing so that we can update our shop drawin

Attachment : RFI Drawing (The Shop Drawing of D-Wall Plan Type 2 and Type 3 that have been
superimposed to the existing pile layout)
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
: 019/RFI/IPR-FSJ/III/2016
: March 4th 2016

Plan along the existing building in Office Area (D-Wall Type 2 and Type 3)
xisting pile drawing we found that the ground anchor will obstruct the existing

vide us the new construction drawing so that we can update our shop drawing.

Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No. : 020/RFI/IPR-FSJ/III


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : March 7th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. Due to the fail in constructing the pile number BP-43, the rebar then removed and PT. Indopora will concrete it with
low grade concrete (B.O concrete). We are asking the consultant to give the information / suggestion about the new
BP-43 position to replace the failed one.

Attachment :

Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
: 020/RFI/IPR-FSJ/III/2016
: March 7th 2016

umber BP-43, the rebar then removed and PT. Indopora will concrete it with
are asking the consultant to give the information / suggestion about the new

Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No. : 021/RFI/IPR-FSJ/III


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : March 7th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. Based on the shop drawing of D-Wall Plan along the existing building in Office Area (D-Wall Type 2 and Type 3)
which has been superimposed to the existing pile drawing we found that the ground anchor will obstruct the existing
pile. Could we remove the ground anchor in those point or minimize the number of ground anchor in those D-Wall
area, because it will be dangerous for the existing building.

Attachment :

Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
: 021/RFI/IPR-FSJ/III/2016
: March 7th 2016

Plan along the existing building in Office Area (D-Wall Type 2 and Type 3)
xisting pile drawing we found that the ground anchor will obstruct the existing
or in those point or minimize the number of ground anchor in those D-Wall

Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No. : 022/RFI/IPR-FSJ/III


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : March 12th 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. We are going to demolish the existing pile no. 15, 17, 18, 19 which obstruct the D-Wall. But the machine cannot
doing the pile demolition because the rig bor's rotary will hit the existing building slab as shown in the attached photo
We are asking whether we can demolish the slab or not.

Attachment : Slab's Photo and the existing pile layout.

Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
: 022/RFI/IPR-FSJ/III/2016
: March 12th 2016

pile no. 15, 17, 18, 19 which obstruct the D-Wall. But the machine cannot
g bor's rotary will hit the existing building slab as shown in the attached photo.

Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. As of February 24th 2016, we have completed extracting 10 piles which is mentioned in the in t
In the attached drawing the piles' number are :
1. No. 1 6. No. 60
2. No. 3 7. No. 51
3. No. 49 8. No. 38
4. No. 37 9. No. 59
5. No. 50 10. No. 58

Based on RFI No : 015/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016 and SI No: PKN-SI-PILING_008 we have already g


demolish the 36 additional existing piles, number :
1 No. 2 13 No. 16
2 No. 4 14 No. 17
3 No. 5 15 No. 18
4 No. 6 16 No. 19
5 No. 8 17 No. 20
6 No. 9 18 No. 21
7 No. 10 19 No. 35
8 No. 11 20 No. 36
9 No. 12 21 No. 39
10 No. 13 22 No. 40
11 No. 14 23 No. 41
12 No. 15 24 No. 42

2. Then we continue to investigate the pile which needed to be demolished for the interest of guid
construction. In the drawing there is mentioned existing pile based on the las investigation, num
1 No. 25 7 No. 63
2 No. 26 8 No. 64
3 No. 27 9 No. 65
4 No. 28 10 No. 66
5 No. 29 11 No. 67
6 No. 30 12 No. 68

So that, we ask for the site instruction based on the drawing to continue extracting the remaine
Please issue the site instruction to extract the balance 12 nos of existing piles.

Attachment : RFI Drawing (latest updated drawing of existing pile that superimpossed to bored pile plan)

Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
ST FOR INFORMATION

ONS JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 023/RFI/IPR-FSJ/IV/2016
Date : April 18th 2016

KING POST

CAPPING BEAM

xtracting 10 piles which is mentioned in the in the contract.

d SI No: PKN-SI-PILING_008 we have already get permit to

25 No. 43
26 No. 44
27 No. 45
28 No. 46
29 No. 47
30 No. 48
31 No. 53
32 No. 55
33 No. 56
34 No. 57
35 No. 61
36 No. 62

eeded to be demolished for the interest of guide wall and d-wall


existing pile based on the las investigation, number :

the drawing to continue extracting the remained existing pile.


pile that superimpossed to bored pile plan)

Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. Due to the fail in constructing the pile number BP-46 for the old TP-1 (soil collapse) in Residence Area on J
has already concrete the hole with low grade concrete (B.O concrete). We are asking the consultant to give
about the new BP-46 position to replace the failed one.

Here are the actual coordinates for BP-46 that casted with B.0 concrete and the piles that casted around B

Actual
Pile Number Coordinates
x y
BP 41 2044.173 -648.193
BP 42 2044.466 -644.971
BP 43 2045.796 -642.889
BP 45 2047.845 -644.061
BP 46 2046.905 -646.901
BP 47 2046.511 -650.561
BP 69 2050.153 -645.305

Attachment : RFI Drawing (bored pile pile with actual casted coordinate for the mentioned bored pile number
Responses :

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
ST FOR INFORMATION

ONS JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 024/RFI/IPR-FSJ/V/2016
Date : May 2nd 2016

KING POST

CAPPING BEAM

or the old TP-1 (soil collapse) in Residence Area on January 11 th 2016, PT. Indopora
(B.O concrete). We are asking the consultant to give the information / suggestion

with B.0 concrete and the piles that casted around BP-46.

oordinate for the mentioned bored pile number)


Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. Based on the shop drawing Rev. 6 that has been superimpossed to the existing pile, we found that pile numb
in Residential Tower and hit the existing pile.
Here is the coordinate for the bored pile and the existing pile.

Coordinate
Bored Pile
Bored Pile Plan Existing Pile (400 x400) Ex
Number
x y x y
BP-90 2,053,739 -658,756 2062.021 -682.758 Half of existing pile (20

Based on the coordinate and the attached drawing, We are asking whether the pile will be shifted or will be

RFI Drawing (bored pile plan Rev. 6 that has been superimpossed to the existing pile drawing)

Attachment :
Responses :

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
OR INFORMATION

S JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 049/RFI/FSJ/II/2017
Date : April 15th 2017

KING POST

CAPPING BEAM

d to the existing pile, we found that pile number BP-90

Explanation

Half of existing pile (200 mm) in the bored pile plan

ing whether the pile will be shifted or will be demolished.


Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. Related with the upcoming ground anchor proving test, we herewith inform you our request to be
confirmation regarding feasibility and safety of our proposed location for ground anchor proving te
drawing of ground anchor plan including the proposed location, also with photos of relevant areas

Attachment : - Drawing No. IPR.SD.FSJ.GA-P.01


- Photos of proposed proving test area

Responses :
Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
OR INFORMATION

S JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 026/RFI/IPR-FSJ/V/2016
Date : May 10th 2016

GROUND ANCHOR

CAPPING BEAM

we herewith inform you our request to be provided with design consultant's


sed location for ground anchor proving test. Please find enclosed the
cation, also with photos of relevant areas.
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. On may 13th 2016, We have already complete demolished existing pile which obstruct BP 148. T
BP 148 but We found that there's a kind of rocky layer in depth more than 15 m. Therefore We c

Attachment : Bored pile plan layout

Responses :
Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
OR INFORMATION

S JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 027/RFI/IPR-FSJ/V/2016
Date : May 19th 2016

GROUND ANCHOR

CAPPING BEAM

ed existing pile which obstruct BP 148. Then, on May 16th 2016 we're continue to drill
depth more than 15 m. Therefore We cannot continue to drill the hole for BP 148.
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
PT. INDOPORA Tbk.
FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. Today, May 26th 2016 we are going to drill BP 88. But when we are drilling we found that there's exist
We are asking whether we can shift the bored pile plan than demolish the existing pile. Here is mentio
existing pile coordinate and the piles' around BP 88 coordinate.

Coordinate
Pile Number Note
x y
Existing Pile No. 71 2053.214 -665.066
Existing Pile *) 2052.045 -664.830 West Side of BP 88 Plan
BP 88 2053.100 -664.858
BP 79 2050.370 -663.051
BP 80 2050.044 -666.033
Attachment : Existing Pile Layout

Responses :

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
OR INFORMATION
PT. PKN
S JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 028/RFI/IPR-FSJ/V/2016
Date : May 26th 2016

GROUND ANCHOR

CAPPING BEAM

re drilling we found that there's existing pile obstruct the bored pile plan.
olish the existing pile. Here is mentioned the bored pile plan coordinate, the
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
PT. INDOPORA Tbk.
FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. Today, June 9th 2016 we are going to drill BP 275. But when we are drilling we found that there're exi
We are asking whether the bored pile plan will be shifted or the existing pile will be demolished. Here
the existing pile coordinate.

Coordinate
Pile Number
x y
Existing Pile No. 72 2118.584 -745.537
Existing Pile No. 73 2118.933 -746.365
BP 275 2118.662 -746.016
Attachment : Existing Pile Layout

Responses :

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
OR INFORMATION
PT. PKN
S JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 029/RFI/IPR-FSJ/VI/2016
Date : June 09th 2016

GROUND ANCHOR

CAPPING BEAM

are drilling we found that there're existing pile obstruct the bored pile plan.
existing pile will be demolished. Here is mentioned the bored pile plan coordinate and
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
PT. INDOPORA Tbk.
FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. Today, June 20th 2016 we are going to drill BP 257. But when we are drilling we found that there're ex
We are asking whether the bored pile plan will be shifted or the existing pile will be demolished. Here
the existing pile coordinate.

Coordinate
Pile Number
x y
Existing Pile No. 74 2117.440 -742.726
Existing Pile No. 75 2116.885 -742.757
BP 257 2117.479 -743.119
Attachment : RFI Drawing, Existing pile obstruct bored pile BP 257

Responses :

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
OR INFORMATION
PT. PKN
S JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 030/RFI/IPR-FSJ/VI/2016
Date : June 20th 2016

GROUND ANCHOR

CAPPING BEAM

are drilling we found that there're existing pile obstruct the bored pile plan.
xisting pile will be demolished. Here is mentioned the bored pile plan coordinate and
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
PT. INDOPORA Tbk.
FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJEC

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1 On Saturday, 23rd 2016 we were going to drill BP 207 and BP 204. But, we found that
asking whether the bored pile will be shifted or he existing pile will be demolished. He
plan and the existing pile.

Coordinate
Pile ID
x y
BP 207 2143.239 -743.336
Existing pile obstruct BP
2143.266 -742.959
207
BP 204 2138.178 -742.783
Existing pile obstruct BP
2137.523 -742.548
204
Attachment : Bored Pile plan with existing pile plot

Responses :

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
EST FOR INFORMATION
PT. PKN
ASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 031/RFI/IPR-FSJ/VII/2016
Date : July 25th 2016

GROUND ANCHOR

CAPPING BEAM

and BP 204. But, we found that there're existing pile obstruct BP Plan. We are
ting pile will be demolished. Here is mentioned the coordinates of 'bored pile
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
PT. INDOPORA Tbk.
FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. Today, July 20th 2016 we are going to drill BP 230 and BP 237. But when we are drilling we f
obstruct the bored pile plan. The existing pile is in the middle of bored pile plan of BP 230. An
and the existing pile which obstruct BP 237. We are asking whether the bored pile plan will b
will be demolished. Here is mentioned the bored pile plan coordinate.

Coordinate
Pile Number
x y
BP 230 2123.856 -779.228
BP 237 2112.832 -788.336
Attachment :

Responses :

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
OR INFORMATION
PT. PKN
S JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 032/RFI/IPR-FSJ/VII/2016
Date : July 25th 2016

GROUND ANCHOR

CAPPING BEAM

37. But when we are drilling we found that there're existing pile
of bored pile plan of BP 230. And there's a slope of existing slab
whether the bored pile plan will be shifted or the existing pile
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
PT. INDOPORA Tbk.
FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. On Saturday July 23rd 2016, we're drilling BP 209. The outer egde of bored pile hit the existing
pile plan in order to avoid the existing pile and install the temporary casing. Here is mentioned
coordinate of BP 209 for consultant's consideration because the shifting distance is more abou

Coordinate
BP 209
x y
Planned Coordinate 2145.493 -746.143
Actual Coordinate 2145.703 -746.171
Attachment :

Responses :

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
OR INFORMATION
PT. PKN
JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 033/RFI/IPR-FSJ/VII/2016
Date : July 25th 2016

GROUND ANCHOR

CAPPING BEAM

egde of bored pile hit the existing pile, therefore we shifted the bored
porary casing. Here is mentioned the planned coordinate and actual
he shifting distance is more about 75 mm.
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
PT. INDOPORA Tbk.
FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. On Thursday, August 4th 2016 we're drilling BP 317, in the depth of 5m we found that there's an
the auger couldn't reach the deeper depth an we found that there's rebar stuck in the auger. Be
we're going to drill BP 201. We are asking whether the pile will be shifted or the existing pile an
Here are mentioned the bored pile plan coordinate. For existing pile coordinate cannot be chec

Coordinate
Pile Number
x y
BP 317 2129.674 -765.001
BP 201 2134.274 -737.921
Attachment :

Responses :

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
OR INFORMATION
PT. PKN
JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 034/RFI/IPR-FSJ/VIII/2016
Date : August 8th 2016

GROUND ANCHOR

CAPPING BEAM

pth of 5m we found that there's an existing pile. We knew that because


here's rebar stuck in the auger. Besides, there's also existing slab when
l be shifted or the existing pile and existing slope will be demolished.
ng pile coordinate cannot be check due to site condition.
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
PT. INDOPORA Tbk.
FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. On July 27th 2016, we're going to drill Bp 323. But when we're drilling and reached the depth 30
10 meter. We've already tried to lift the casing up, but we still cannot take the casing. We are a
trapped casing. Here is the pile coordinate and bored pile mapping including the mapping for t

Coordinate
No. Pile
x y
BP 323 2135.899 -752.308
Attachment : Bored Pile Plan Mapping

Responses :

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
OR INFORMATION
PT. PKN
JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 035/RFI/IPR-FSJ/VIII/2016
Date : August 9th 2016

GROUND ANCHOR

CAPPING BEAM

drilling and reached the depth 30 m, the steel casing slip down about
cannot take the casing. We are asking for shifting the pile due to the
pping including the mapping for the casted pile around the pile.
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
PT. INDOPORA Tbk.
FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. On August 12th 2016, We are going to drill BP 205. But we found that there's an existing pile o
We are asking whether the pile will be shifted or the existing pile will be demolished. Here is m
existing pile coordinate for your consideration.

Coordinate
No. Pile
x y
BP 205 2140.985 -740.529
Existing Pile Obstruct BP
2141.658 -740.370
205
Attachment : Bored Pile Plan Mapping & Existing Pile Photo

Responses :

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
OR INFORMATION
PT. PKN
S JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 036/RFI/IPR-FSJ/VIII/2016
Date : August 13th 2016

GROUND ANCHOR

CAPPING BEAM

found that there's an existing pile obstruct the bored pile plan.
g pile will be demolished. Here is mention the boed pile plan and the
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
PT. INDOPORA Tbk.
FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN
Up : Edgardo B, Paz

Subject : BORED PILE

D-WALL

Statements

1. On July 27th 2016, We are going to drill BP 219. But We found that there's a kind of rock in de
cannot continue to drill the hole for BP 219. Then, yesterday August 18 th 2016, we're triying to
We are asking whethere we can shift the pile position because We can't continue drilling.

Coordinate
No. Pile
x y
BP 219 2140.804 -765.619
Attachment : Bored Pile Plan Mapping & Existing Pile Photo

Responses :

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA
OR INFORMATION
PT. PKN
S JAKARTA PROJECT

No. : 037/RFI/IPR-FSJ/VIII/2016
Date : August 19th 2016

GROUND ANCHOR

CAPPING BEAM

nd that there's a kind of rock in depth between 8 m - 10 m. Therefore We


August 18 th 2016, we're triying to drill the hole and still cannot continue drilling.
Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOUR SEASONS JAKARTA PROJECT

To : PT. PKN No : 019/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/


Up : Edgardo B, Paz Date : March 1st 2016

Subject : BORED PILE KING POST

D-WALL CAPPING BEAM

Statements

1. For KP-1 detail A and D (construction drwaing G-S-100C) the amount of studs mentioned 228 nos, but in section-01
and section-5 there're 4 pairs of stud in each side. If there're 38 nos of stud in each side, it means the total stud
amount are 152 nos. So, which one do we addopt for drawing? Please correct out statement, if we addopt 228 nos
the section detail will be changed to be 57 nos each side and if we addopt 38 nos stud for each side thre will be 152
nos.

2. In construction drawing G-S-100E mentioned that in the section details, the kingpost's size is 600 x 200 . But there's
also information mentioned that kingpost's size is 600 x 300.
So please correct that the size 600 x 200 or 600 x 300?

Attachment
Responses

Attachment :
Requested by, Endorsed by, Noted by,

Satrio Setijono Toto Ismintarto Edgardo B. Paz


PT. INDOPORA PT. GISTAMA PT. PKN
: 019/RFI/IPR-FSJ/II/2016
: March 1st 2016

drwaing G-S-100C) the amount of studs mentioned 228 nos, but in section-01
n each side. If there're 38 nos of stud in each side, it means the total stud
o we addopt for drawing? Please correct out statement, if we addopt 228 nos
e 57 nos each side and if we addopt 38 nos stud for each side thre will be 152

ntioned that in the section details, the kingpost's size is 600 x 200 . But there's

Noted by,

Edgardo B. Paz
PT. PKN

S-ar putea să vă placă și