Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Only
standards directly addressed in Designing Teaching & Learning that are relevant to this assignment have been
included. However, this does not mean the other standards are irrelevant to lesson planning and evaluation
more generally.
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following NSW Quality Teaching model elements.
Evaluation score refer to NSW QTM Classroom Practice Guide for each element
Comments incl. evidence for evaluation score (2 sentences)
1 Intellectual quality
1.1 Deep knowledge
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 The only knowledge gained is the definition of words, but these words are not explored on a
deeper level. Words are not related to context.
1.2 Deep understanding
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 Activities seem easy to grasp in terms of understanding, but deep understanding is not
stimulated.
1.3 Problematic knowledge
1234 Comments:
5 There isn't opportunity for problematic knowledge as tasks are based on definitions and
applying definitions,
1.4 Higher-order thinking
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 Higher order thinking is not stimulated throughout the lesson plan as the activities are quite
simple and basic.
1.5 Metalanguage
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 Lesson focuses heavily on terminology in relation to ancient Egypt which means many new
terms are used and applied by students.
1.6 Substantive communication
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 Finding the definition of words related to ancient Egypt as well as mind mapping new words
allows for the opportunity of discussion. Students have the opportunity to communicate in
pairs as well as to the teacher.
Quality learning environment
2.1 Explicit quality criteria
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 No reference to explicit quality criteria.
2.2 Engagement
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 Shifting of activities means that students remain engaged during the lesson. Also the use of
pairs stimulates engagement. However, there is not a point in the lesson where there is a
whole class discussion which limits engagement. Activities also seem repetitive and simular
and so students may become bored.
2.3 High expectations
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 The lesson plan seems to achieve only the ability to understand the definition of key words
which doesn't reflect high expectations.
2.4 Social support
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 Students are given the opportunity to work in pairs as well as to report their findings to the
teacher. There isn't opportunity for a class discussion which does limit social support.
2.5 Students self-regulation
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 Students have to complete the worksheet on their own which means there is an aspect of self
regulation in the lesson plan.
2.6 Student direction
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 Students do not really have the opportunity to direct how the lesson is going. Students are not
given the chance to make suggestions or have options in regards to what activities they do in
class.
3 Significance
3.1 Background knowledge
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 Students working on their concept maps allows them to brainstorm and think about any
background knowledge they have in regards to the topic. There is not much discussion about
these words and so background knowledge isn't discussed effectively.
3.2 Cultural knowledge
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 Although students explored key words which relate to ancient Egypt, cultural knowledge in
relation to this is not expressed in the lesson plan. There is massive potential for cultural
knowledge to be explored but it is not explicitly explored in the lesson plan.
3.3 Knowledge integration
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5
3.4 Inclusivity
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 Inclusivity is evident with the teacher asking each pair about what they came up with. There
is room for more inclusivity.
3.5 Connectedness
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 An understanding of ancient Egypt allows for an understanding of the evolving world. Some
terminology learnt could relate to the world in a broader sense.
3.6 Narrative
1 2 3 4 Comments:
5 There is no mention of specific stories about ancient Egypt and there is no evidence of
narratives in the lesson plan.
Identify the two APST standards and two NSW QT model elements you are targeting for improvement.
APST
1) 1.3 Students with diverse linguistic, cultural, religious 2) 2.6 Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
and socioeconomic backgrounds
QT model
1) 1.4 Higher-order thinking 2) 1.1 Deep knowledge
Topic area: Stage of Learner: Syllabus Pages:
Ancient Egypt 4 60
Date: 14/03/2016 Location Booked: Lesson Number: 1 /14
Time: Total Number of students Printing/preparation
60 minutes 24 Kahoot quiz
ICT capability Kahoot, YouTube clip and use of Understanding historical terms and themes, literacy
smart board. skills.
Time Teaching and learning actions Organisation Centred
T/S
Intro Students are to come in and settle in to Teacher: Instruct students to
class. Teacher is to call out the Roll. come in and be prepared.
0-5 T
Teacher is to call out the Roll.
Student: Following instructions.
Resources:
Body Ask students what they know about ancient Teacher: moderates the class
societies in general and also ask students discussion by allowing students
5-15
about what languages they speak apart from who put their hand up to share
English. Allow students to explore their their personal experiences.
identity and their personal culture, religion
and socioeconomic background through a Student: following instructions T/S
whole class discussion. as well as has the ability to
explain their personal affiliation
with culture. Language, religion
and socioeconomic background.
Resources:
Concept Map: Teacher is to get students into Teacher: Provide instructions on
15-25 pairs and in their workbooks ask every concept map
student to write Ancient Egypt in the
middle of the page. Instruct students to Student: Work in pairs to create
T/S
write as many words they know that relate a concept map.
to the topic around the page, they are to
collaborate with their partner. They may use Resources:
a dictionary if they are unsure of spelling.
YouTube Clip Teacher: Show YouTube clip and
25-35 have students involved in a
Show students an introduction of Ancient group discussion. Allow
Egypt and discuss the content of the video. students the opportunity to
Allow students time to add new concepts build on their concept map to
and words learnt from the video into their reflect building on their
concept maps. They can do this as they knowledge.
watch the video.
Student: Listen and engage with
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdtgX9 content.
ORiW 4
Resurces:
T/S
At this point, words that should be included https://www.youtube.com/wat
in concept map are: ch?v=KdtgX9ORiW 4
Access to a smart board to show
Mummification, Desert, Hieroglyphics, the video.
Domesticate, Egypt, Delta, Scribe,
Embalming, Inundation, Irrigation, Famine,
After Life, Dynasty, Sarcophagus, Oasis,
Deities, Papyrus, Pyramid, Ploughing,
Pharaohs, The Nile River, Canopic jars,
Shadoof
6
Students have the opportunity to ask
teacher what these words mean if they need
more clarification.
Focus on contextualising knowledge and Teacher: Asks specific questions
contextualising the words that have been to particular students until all
35-45
learnt in class. Ask students what they students have answered at least
believe the significance of the Nile river was once.
for the flourishing of ancient Egypt?
Integrate other key terms learnt and ask Student: Considers the context T/S
students what the purpose of these of ancient egypt and answers
concepts are in relation to ancient Egypt. teachers questions about the
Ensure that all students answer at least one purpose and significance of key
question by differentiating questions terms.
towards different student, depending on
their skill level. Resources:
45-55 Use kahoot to conduct a quiz based on the Teacher: Organises quiz before
content learnt in class in relation to ancient the lesson. Explains to students
Egypt. Gather results. Keep these to make how Kahoot works and displays
comparisons with a follow up quiz. the Kahoot quiz on smart board S
for all students to see.
Tell students that the person with the top
score will be awarded a merit certificate. Student: Takes part in quiz.
Resources: Computers/tablets.
Acceess to https://kahoot.it/
Game pin: 253223
Conclusi Pack up and ask students to revise the class Teacher: facilitate packing up
on content as a different kahoot quiz will be and explain what needs to be
T
55-60 given next week as revision and results will prepared before the next
be compared with current results to see if lesson.
there has been improvement made. Assure
students that this will be an informal Student:
assessment and will not go towards grades.
Resources:
7
How am I measuring the outcomes of this lesson?
8
Justification
The justification will discuss the four main improvements made to the original History lesson plan.
The main changes made focus on the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) and
the NSW Quality Teaching Model (QTM). The reason these changes were made was because they
were either absent or very poorly executed in the original lesson plan.
The first element which will be explored is standard 1.3 from APST. Students should be
encouraged to share their personal affiliation with languages, culture, religion and socioeconomic
backgrounds as a way to establish an understanding of the society in which the lesson will be
delving into. It is common for students in many schools to come from diverse backgrounds and so
it is a good opportunity for students to find customs that they are part of which may be relevant
to customs of ancient Egypt. Standard 1.3 assists students to have a connection with the content
being learned in class as it makes it more relevant to students when they are able to compare and
contrast personal experiences in their contemporary society, with customs and experiences of
those who lived in ancient Egypt (Bender, 2012). By doing this, students are placed into the
correct mind set as they will understand ancient Egyptian customs, hierarchies and religions more
effectively because they can relate to a certain extent. This task also promotes higher order
thinking as students are comparing two very different societies.
ICT has been incorporated and managed in the new lesson plan, in a logical sequence so that
students can get the most out of its use. The YouTube video has been placed earlier on in the
lesson plan to allow more time for reflection and discussion in relation to the information
presented in the clip. Research has shown that use of ICT in the classroom promotes "active and
independent learning" which ultimately means that students range of learning skills are
strengthened (Jarvis, 2014).The addition of the Kahoot quiz into the lesson plan allows for
effective use of ICT as a tool to measure how well students can apply knowledge they have learnt
in class. The tool is efficient and results can be viewed by teacher as a way to highlight students
abilities and work towards bettering them.
In relation to NSW Quality Teaching Model, changes were made to the original lesson plan in
order to create a better quality of Higher order thinking and deep knowledge for students. Higher
order thinking was implemented by teaching students to contextualise the key terms they had
learnt in the lesson. Students are not simply asked to define words, but to also be questioned
about their significance, purpose and use in the context of Ancient Egypt. Higher order thinking is
also promoted with the implementation of standard 1.3 as students are not only analysing Ancient
Egypt, but are able to draw connections and differences between the ancient and modern world
(Ludwig, J., & Gore, J. 2003). Contemporary research suggests that the implementation of
technology into lessons actually promotes higher order thinking as students must "solve
problems" and remain focused in order to complete ICT tasks such as Kahoot (Lee & Choi, 2017).
The use of smart-boards along with YouTube clip and Kahoot means that students minds are
constantly stimulated and higher order thinking is activated with the activities associated with
these ICT based activities.
Deep knowledge was broadened in the updated lesson plan by incorporating more challenging
tasks in the lesson. This includes the incorporation of contextualising knowledge as applying the
9
terms to their context gives students a deeper understanding of Ancient Egypt and life during this
time. This allows students to also develop the skills to understand the relationship with power
structures, everyday life and customs of Ancient Egypt in relation to the modern world. This
broadens students knowledge of the world and history and ultimately develops and exercises
their ability to process knowledge in depth. Research has shown that having discussions about
class content stimulates deep thinking and ultimately allows students to gain deep knowledge
about the content (Strahan, D., Hedt, M., & Melville, C. 2014). This is why the new lesson plan
incorporated more opportunity for discussion and questioning throughout the lesson as a means
to promote deeper knowledge of the topic. Research also states that learning new and
complicated words has a direct impact on gaining deep knowledge, as students are able to express
themselves more effectively and intelligently in relation to content (Goel & Singhal,2016). This is
why the lesson plan has a massive emphasis of learning new terms which relate to Ancient Egypt.
These terms are repeated and tested using the Kahoot quiz as a means to maintain the use of
deep knowledge throughout the lesson.
10
References:
Jarvis, M. (2014). Brilliant ideas for using ict in the classroom : a very practical guide for teachers and
lecturers. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2017). What affects learner's higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning
environments? The effects of learner factors. Computers & Education, 115, 143-152.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.015
Strahan, D., Hedt, M., & Melville, C. (2014). Literacy integration through seminars: teacher and student
perspectives on efforts to nurture deep thinking. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9(1), 53+. Retrieved
from
http://ezproxy.uws.edu.au/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/ps/i.do?p=AONE&s
w=w&u=uwsydney&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA394232642&asid=3c83a84af54d71343560f8206410b6e8
Goel, A. K., & Singhal, P. (2016). Product Innovation through Knowledge Management and Social Media
Strategies (pp. 1-421). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9607-5
Bender, T. (2012). Discussion-based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning: Theory, Practice, and
Assessment. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Ludwig, J., & Gore, J. (2003). Quality Teaching in NSW Public Schools A classroom practice guide Retrieved
from http://www.rqt.edu.au/files/5514/1774/9895/NSW_DET_2003- Quality_Teaching_Guide.pdf
ePortfolio Weblink:
http://raassoum.weebly.com
11