Sunteți pe pagina 1din 43

GSM Optimization Guide book

Han Bin Jie / CMPAK

1. Call Drop Analysis

1.1 Problem Description

3

3

1.2 Call Drop Caused by Coverage

3

 

1.2.1 Reason Analysis

3

1.2.2 Solutions

4

1.3 Call Drop Caused by Handover

4

1.3.1 Reason Analysis

1.3.2 Observation methods

4

5

1.3.3 Solutions

5

1.4 Call drops caused by fault of hardware equipment or system parameter

6

1.4.1 Parameter fault

6

1.4.2 Hardware fault

6

1.4.3 Wrong BTS longitude and latitude

1.4.4 Impact from system capacity expansion, upgrade and patch

7

7

1.5 Call drop caused by interference

7

1.5.1 Reason Analysis

1.5.2 Method to figure out interference type by OMC-R

1.5.3 Solutions

7

7

8

1.6 Call drop caused by antenna and feeder

9

1.6.1 Reason Analysis

1.6.2 Analysis and solutions for antenna and feeder problem

9

10

1.7 Call drop caused by transmission fault

1.8 Call drop caused by utilization of repeater

10

11

2 Assignment failure rate

11

 

2.1 Problem Description

11

2.2 Common fault analysis

12

2.3 Solutions

13

3 SDCCH/TCH congestion

14

 

3.1 Problem description

14

3.2 Only SDCCH is congested

15

3.2.1 Common problem analysis

3.2.2 Measures for solving SDCCH congestion and sharing signaling load

15

16

3.3 TCH congestion

17

3.3.1 Common problem analysis

3.3.2 Measures for solving TCH congestion and sharing traffic load

17

19

4 Analysis of handover failure rate

20

4.1 Problem description

4.2 Common failure analysis and solution

20

21

5 Handover reason proportion analysis

24

5.1 Proportion of handover triggered by bad downlink quality is high

24

5.1.1 Problem description

5.1.2 Common fault analysis

24

25

5.1.3

Solutions

25

5.2 Proportion of handover triggered by bad uplink quality is high

26

5.2.1 Problem description

5.2.2 Common Fault Analysis

5.2.3 Troubleshooting

26

26

26

5.3 Big proportion of handover due to downlink level

5.4 Big proportion of handover due to uplink level

27

27

 

5.5 big proportion of handover due to distance

28

6

RACH access validity

 

29

 
 

6.1 description

29

6.2 Common fault

29

6.3 Common fault analysis

 

29

6.4 Troubleshooting

30

 

7 No traffic or handover in the cell

 

31

 

7.1 description

31

7.2 Common fault analysis and troubleshooting

31

8.

call successful rate

 

31

 

8.1 PAGING TIMEOUT

32

8.2 Communication link establishment fail

 

33

 

9.

reason and troubleshooting of coverage lessening of the sites

33

 

9.1 reason on sites side and troubleshooting

 

34

9.2 Others

35

10

analysis and troubleshooting of hot issues

 

35

 

10.1

terminating MS has signaling but when it’s terminated, it tells that user is not in the

serving area

35

 

10.2 MS has signaling but is implicitly power-off when being paged

36

10.3 MS signaling unstable in idle state

37

10.4 Signaling fluctuate during MS making calls

 

37

10.5 Echo in MS communication

37

10.6 Other

38

11

typical case analysis and optimization measures

 

38

11.1 Case one

38

11.2 case two

39

11.3 case three

40

11.4 case four

40

11.5 Case five

41

11.6

case six

41

11.7 Case seven

42

11.8 Case eight

42

1. Call Drop Analysis

1.1 Problem Description

Figure 1 Radio link fault signaling flow 1.2 Call Drop Caused by Coverage 1.2.1 Reason

Figure 1 Radio link fault signaling flow

1.2 Call Drop Caused by Coverage

1.2.1 Reason Analysis

1Call drop occurs in the following situations: the server cell’s coverage is too large due to various reasons (such as perfect radio propagation environment or too high power) and the server cell even covers its neighbor cells; the azimuth angle of its neighbor cell’s directional antenna (we suppose neighbor cell is a directional cell) has problem or neighbor cell’s signal is too weak that cause MS still occupies the original server cell A’s channel when MS moves out of the coverage of cell B defined as the server cell A’s neighbor cell and moves into cell C which isn’t defined as server cell A’s neighbor cell, so MS fails when it tries to hand over neighbor cell B offered by server cell A. These situations usually happen in urban areas where BTS are densely distributed. 2Obvious holes without being covered exist in the boundary between two cells. 3Too small coverage may be because hardware equipment of a certain cell has problems, such as antenna is blocked or BCCH TRX has problems (in the power amplifier part). 4Shadow effect caused by some tall buildings may bring fast fading of MS signal, then call drops when handover can’t be carried out in time. 5If neighbor cell isn’t defined completely, MS will be in connected status in the server cell and call drop occurs when MS moves out of the server cell’s coverage.

1.2.2 Solutions

1Find out weak covered areas Through traffic statistic analysis, first we shall make sure whether cell’s call drop rate is high (accompanied by high outgoing handover failure rate) and handovers are mostly rescue Rxlev

handover but other indicators are normal. If so, we shall check whether it is coverage problem, then we ascertain weak covered areas through DT. In addition, we shall analyze whether call drop is caused by special topography, such as tunnel, supermarket, subway entrance and hollow. Generally, this kind of call drop focuses on a certain direction; we can solve it through adding micro-beehive.

2Expand BTS coverage Find out weak covered areas through customer complaints, and then check whether new sites need to be added, or site’s coverage needs to be expanded through some means. For instance, increase site’s max transmitting power, change antenna’s azimuth angle, tilt angle, height, etc. (we shall comprehensively take into account frequency planning situation and coverage status in other directions).

3Eliminate the impact from shifted signal Through regular DT to find out sites with irregular coverage, and eliminate the impact of its shifted signal to other sites. As to call drops caused by impact from shifted signal, we can solve them through decreasing site’s tilt angle, or decreasing BSPWR MAX and increasing RXLEV ACCESS MIN to shrink the coverage. Of course we shall avoid blind area from appearing during the adjustment.

4Eliminate hardware fault If call drop rate rises abruptly but other indicators of the site are all normal, then we shall check whether its neighbor cells work well (problems may occur in the downlink, such in TRX, diversity unit and antenna; if problems occur in the uplink, then the cell’s outgoing handover failure rate will be high).

5Check whether neighbor cell list is defined completely Check whether neighbor cells defined in OMC-R database are mutual neighbors and whether neighbor cell list is incomplete. Different operators shall often refer to neighbor cells’ data.

1.3 Call Drop Caused by Handover 1.3.1 Reason Analysis

1Unreasonable parameters When BTS is carrying out rescue Rxlev handover (when mobile phone’s Rxlev is lower than IRXLEVULH, IRXLEVDLH), some handover request may fail due to too weak signal strength of the incoming handover cell, and call usually drops even if the handover is successful due to too weak signal strength.

2T3103 overtime

T3103 is overtime: T3103 starts to record when BSC sends message HANDOVER COMMAND to MS, T3103 reset when BSC receives message HANDOVER COMPLETE from target cell for incoming handover or message HANDOVER FAILURE from the original cell. BSC will send message HANDOVER COMMAND to BTS, if T3103 receives none of the upper two reply messages, BSC regards that radio link fails in the original cell and then release channel of the original cell. Signaling flow is shown in Figure 4.

of the original cell. Signaling flow is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4 call drop due

Figure 4 call drop due to T3103 overtime

1.3.2 Observation methods

If high call drop rate is caused by handover problem, we can find out the main reason for handover through analyzing OMC-R traffic report. Handover may be caused by downlink RX LEVEL, uplink/downlink RX QUAL, uplink/downlink interference, power budget (PBGT), call directional retry, traffic, etc.

1.3.3 Solutions

Carry out DT in a large extent, because handover is taken place among cells and BTS, call drops in one cell may be because of unreasonable handover setting with its neighbor cells. Pay high emphasis on cells have topological relation with the original cell and have high congestion rate, and check whether blind cell exists around the original cell. If call drop is caused by these two reasons, we shall modify relevant frequency and add new sites, or expand the coverage of the original site. If call drop is due to unreasonable handover setting, we can modify handover

parameter according to the field test. As to call drops caused by unbalanced traffic and target BTS has no channel to hand over on busy hour, we can adjust the traffic to solve it.

1.4 Call drops caused by fault of hardware equipment or system parameter

1.4.1 Parameter fault

We can check whether parameters are reasonable through parameter checking tool, like whether frequency planning is reasonable, whether MAIO of TRX in the cell conflicts with each other (in this situation, all indicators will be bad, such as assignment failure rate), whether hopping frequency has interference, whether timer of BSC matches that of MSC (if CELL’s T3103 is higher than BSC’s BSSMAPT8, then call drops when MS is carrying out handover). When parameter IRXLEVDLH and RXLEVMINCELL are unmatched in definition, it is easily to make call drop because when MS reaches IRXLEVDLH or IRXLEVULH but there is no neighbor cell reach the RXLEVMINCELL. Besides, unreasonable HOMAGIN also causes call drop during the handover. We can observe whether the definitions of T3101 and T3107 are so strict that system has no sufficient time to send assignment completed message to BSC, and call drops because timer has already reset.

1.4.2 Hardware fault

We can check alarm related to hardware in OMC-R if call drop is caused by hardware fault. If there is no hardware alarm in OMC-R, it may be caused by fault of a certain TRX or diversity part, then at the same time assignment failure rate and uplink/downlink quality handover proportion will be very high. We can find out the fault by ABIS monitoring software or by carrying out CQT to suspicious TRX after turning off other TRX in the cell. We shall replace the faulted hardware in time once discover it; if there is no equipment available for replacing, we shall turn off faulted equipment to avoid call drops that may impact network operation quality. Generally, when frame processing unit is faulted, assignment failure rate and uplink/downlink quality handover proportion will be high; when receiving part is faulted, assignment failure rate and uplink quality handover proportion will be high; when transmitting part is faulted, faulted, assignment failure rate and downlink quality handover proportion will be high.

1.4.3 Wrong BTS longitude and latitude

In the field DT, we find that sometimes few BTS’s longitude and latitude are not the same with those in the planning or even have huge differences with them. It is mainly because difficulties appeared in site selection make it impossible to locate BTS according to design demand. But the

new location of the site wasn’t updated in planning database, and we still planned its neighbor cells and frequencies according to the original plan, then lots of neighbor cells are missed or set wrong and this finally causes high call drop rate.

1.4.4 Impact from system capacity expansion, upgrade and patch

After system has been adjusted on a large scale, like cutting over newly-added sites for launch, BTS capacity expansion, frequency re-planning, upgrade and patch, we shall carry out an overall checking and adjustment to its related system parameters. We shall pay special attention to neighbor cell relations, frequency interference as well as hopping parameter, cell parameter, etc.

1.5 Call drop caused by interference

1.5.1 Reason Analysis

Because the frequency of SDCCH that BTS assigns to MS may not be the same with that of TCH, we need to analyze them separately. Interference includes co-channel interference, adjacent channel interference and intermodulation interference. Error rate will be deteriorated and mobile phone can’t demodulate BSIC of neighbor cell accurately or can’t receive MS measure report correctly when mobile phone receives strong co-channel or adjacent channel interference signal. Intermodulation interference is produced by transmitter of analog BTS in digital and analog co- sited BTS; the direct impact of this kind of interference is BTS resource waste because time slot can’t be assigned.

1.5.2 Method to figure out interference type by OMC-R

1We can observe OMC-R counter related to interference. In some systems, when channel is idle, system will observe the interference to the channel and report it in a certain period. When channels working in interference are too many, then we can judge that the system has interference. 2We can judge whether uplink interference exists through observing the absolute value of the average level in RACH request that can be decoded by system. 3We can judge through observing handover reason statistic of OMC-R. In normal situation, PBGT handover shall be much more than other handover (accounts for over 60% of the total handover times); we can regard it as uplink interference or hardware fault if uplink quality handover is too many; we can regard it as downlink interference or hardware fault if downlink quality handover is too many; we can regard it as hardware fault if both uplink and downlink

quality handovers are too many (it is also possible that both uplink interference and downlink interference exist at the same time).

1.5.3 Solutions

1Eliminate uplink interference This is the main interference at present. Uplink interference often occurs on a period with the maximum traffic. It mainly comes from co-channel interference or exterior interference. Co- channel interference is related to the traffic of intra-frequency cell; the higher traffic, the larger interference. Exterior interference is intermodulation interference. Uplink interference can be solved by analyzing related reports in DT, modifying co-channel frequency in intra-frequency cell, increasing distance between two intra-frequency cells (statistic shows that signal strength attenuates along with the 4 power of the distance) or using spectrum analyzer. It can also be decreased through diversity and effective power control.

2Eliminate downlink interference Downlink interference is not very common. It is mainly co-channel interference and adjacent channel interference of some BTS caused by improper frequency planning. We can judge it through handover test report in OMC, downlink interference usually cause frequent downlink handover. If co-channel interference and adjacent channel interference are discovered in test report and field test, we shall re-optimize and re-adjust frequency planning of the cellular system. As to cells have interference but aren’t in the upper situations, we can find out interference source by using spectrum analyzer.

3Use discontinuous transmission (DTX), hopping technology, power control and diversity technology DTX includes uplink DTX (set by parameter DTXMODE) and downlink DTX (set by parameter CELLDTXDOWNLINK); both of them use VAD technology and stop transmitting when voice signal isn’t transmitted (only a group of SID frame is sent in each 480ms to meet the measure requirement of BTS). Then useless information is restrained from sending and effective transmitting time is decreased, so that system’s interference level can be depressed and life of the battery can be prolonged. Hopping can improve radio signal’s transmitting quality effectively, especially to the transmitting quality of slowly-moving object. This is because hopping makes transmitting TRX hop on each unit length of burst that can obviously decrease co-channel interference and frequency selectivity fading effect. But DTX has to be adjusted according to practical surrounding radio environment and relations with neighbor cells. If the receiving signal of the mobile phone is not good, call drop may occur when using DTX. It is because that when DTX is used in downlink and mobile phone is in connected status, BTS transmitting power gets strong while the subscriber is talking and gets weak on gaps. In this way, on the one hand we can decrease interference to other BTS, but on the other hand if there is interference surrounds the BTS then discontinuous transmission of downlink signal makes call quality worse; and when BTS decrease transmitting power, call quality deteriorates and even call drop occurs in some places where receiving signal is relatively weak and interference signal is relatively strong.

1.6 Call drop caused by antenna and feeder

1.6.1 Reason Analysis

1Call drops due to different down/up tilt angles of two pairs of antennas

In BTS installation, each directional cell has two pairs of antennas, then BCCH and SDCCH of

the cell may be transmitted separately by different antennas. Different down/up tilt angles of two pairs of antennas will cause different coverage of the two pairs of antennas, which means call drops may occur when subscriber can receive BCCH but can’t occupy SDCCH sent by another antenna while setting a call.

2Call drops due to antenna’s azimuth angle

In BTS installation, each directional cell has two pairs of antennas. If the azimuth angles of the

two pairs of antennas are different, then call drops occur when subscriber can receive SDCCH and be assigned to TCH sent by another pair of antenna.

3Call drops due to antenna feeder The transmitting power and receiving sensitivity will be decreased due to damaged and folded feeder, or because feeder is affected by water or loose contact. Consequently, call drop occurs severely. We can ascertain the reason through testing VSWR.

4Call drops due to too short distance between antennas for diversity or unparallel Rx and Tx antennas

A certain horizontal distance between two pairs of antennas should be insured to realize diversity

receiving; otherwise receiving sensitivity will be decreased and call drops will occur. When we use diversity receiving antenna, generally an ideal effect will be obtained and gain is 3dB if distance between Rx and Tx antennas is about 3 to 5 meters. But diversity receiving will be hard

to realize if the distance between Rx and Tx antennas is shorter than 1 meter. Besides, if Rx and

Tx antennas are unparallel, or even transmitting antenna directs receiving antenna, or there is a very tall iron pole not far away from Rx and Tx antennas, signals will be obstructed and reflected easily and interference will be produced.

5Call drops due to too strong backward signal strength from directional antenna

If backward signal from a cell’s directional antenna is too strong, call drops when MS occupies

the signal but can’t find its neighbor cell.

1.6.2 Analysis and solutions for antenna and feeder problem

1Check antenna’s azimuth angle and down/up tilt angle

If call drops due to incorrect antenna’s azimuth angle and down/up tilt angle, we shall first observe the BTS. We can find out fault reason by carrying out CQT, DT while combining with statistics from OMC in faulted cells, and decrease call drop rate through adjusting antenna azimuth angle and down/up tilt angle. If it is because of too strong backward signal strength from directional antenna, we shall replace the antenna in time.

2Eliminate feeder problem If call drops are due to decreased BTS transmitting power and receiving sensitivity caused by damaged feeder or loose contact, we can ascertain fault reason and faulted place through measuring feeder by feeder test instrument, so as to replace faulted feeders and connectors in time. Notices in feeder system:

Avoid feeders from being connected reversely because they are wrong labeled; avoid feeders from getting affected by water, pay attention to dust prevention and firmness of feeder’s combination parts; be familiar with feeder’s working environment and physical nature, check whether feeder is aging according to practical installation and cabling rather than doing analysis simply relying on VSWR tested by instrument; avoid other things from getting inside connectors so that situations such as feeder’s short circuit or dust entry won’t happen.

3Use reasonable antenna type Because presently sites distribute more densely and network structure keeps on changing, we suggest using some small-sized antennas with low gain and high forward and backward isolation in BTS in urban areas or areas with densely-distributed sites. We don’t need to worry about any bad impact that small antenna may impose to signal coverage at all; contrarily, radio space will be purer and easier to be controlled than before because of antenna’s lower gain and higher forward and backward isolation. According to the practical effect of using small antenna, network performance has been improved obviously.

4Eliminate interference from antenna backward signal Antennas are usually installed on poles, towers or rails on top floor in urban area, therefore they may be too high and it’s not easy to control signal coverage, even backward signal may be interference to the network. We suggest installing antennas on a floor’s walls, and then antenna’s backward signal will be obstructed by buildings.

1.7 Call drop caused by transmission fault

Faults in Abis interface include that BSC doesn’t receive measure report from BTS; failed signaling during handover and some internal reasons; impact of error rate on Abis interface. There isn’t many faults occurs on A interface, most of them are handover failure (handover between BSCs or MSCs) because handover data are not complete or target BTS isn’t qualified to be handed over in. We shall adjust BTS clock, check transmission synchronization and transmission quality regularly. Adjusting BTS clock and checking transmission synchronization is for signal

synchronization and improving handover success rate between MSCs or BSCs. Checking transmission quality, checking transmitting error rate by instrument, or even checking 2M cable connectors regularly are very necessary. Because unstable transmission link will cause signaling lose and unstable lower link or even call drops. Stable transmission quality can decrease lots of Abis call drops.

1.8 Call drop caused by utilization of repeater

Some business and trade centers like shopping mall as well as some small BTS in counties use repeater to amplify signals directly for reducing investment and expanding coverage. Signals are transmitted by fiber or in microwave. Due to topography, environment and engineering equality reasons, demanded indicators can’t be satisfied and then call drop occurs. When we use repeater, distance control parameter setting (TA setting) requires special attention. Otherwise distance reason will cause handover failure, consequently call drop or call clearing. We usually transmit signals in microwave when using outdoor repeater. Therefore repeater amplifies interference as well while amplifying required BTS uplink and downlink signals. Then signal quality gets worse and finally call drops accompanied with obvious assignment failure rate raise. We shall survey repeater’s real surrounding cells according to its neighbor cell definition while installing it, and pay special to whether it will cause mutual interference to its surrounding cells; if so, call drop due to handover failure (T3103 overtime) and interference will occur. After repeater has been installed, we shall observe whether assignment failure rate, call drop rate and handover proportion due to quality reason are deteriorated suddenly; if so, we can ascertain there is interference. If the situation mentioned above occurs, we shall re-plan frequency, modify neighbor cell list, adjust handover parameter and power control parameter. Anyway, no matter what kind of reason causes call drop, we shall analyze it through all kinds of test methods and test reports from OMC, and carry out CQT and DT periodically.

2 Assignment failure rate

2.1 Problem Description

Signaling flow assigned by TCH is shown in figure7-5.

Figure 5 Signaling flow assigned by TCH The following reasons cause assignment failure: BTS downlink

Figure 5 Signaling flow assigned by TCH The following reasons cause assignment failure:

BTS downlink fault prevents assignment message from sending correctly; MS can’t receive the assignment message; MS can’t identify the assignment message; MS can’t occupy the assigned channel; BTS can’t receive or can’t identify SABM from MS; BTS uplink fault prevents assignment completion message from sending to BSC. When MS can’t occupy the channel assigned by network, it will send back assignment failure message. Other situations will make T3107 overtime.

2.2 Common fault analysis

1Faulted transmitter or receiver Generally assignment failure rate will be very high when TRX is faulted; incoming handover failure rate will also be very high because BSC assigns channel for MS during incoming handover. If a cell’s assignment failure rate is over 10%, then it is most probably due to TRX fault; if the rate is over 5%, usually we suspect it is due to TRX fault or interference; if the rate is 3%~5%, then it may be caused by congestion or interference; if the rate is lower than 3%, commonly it is because of radio environment influence.

2Co-channel interference or adjacent channel interference We shall analyze it according to interference value. High error rate caused by interference prevents MS from establishing the second layer link with BTS and then causes failed assignment.

3Feeder problem If feeder is broken or get corroded, then VSWR will be so high that it may impact receiving and transmitting performance.

4Main diversity antenna is blocked or can’t offer symmetric coverage When antenna that only transmits TCH TRX is blocked or its covered area is different from another antenna that transmits BCCH TRX or SDCCH TRX, then MS may not occupy the TCH.

5Unreasonable parametersHSN, MAIO, T3107 settingWhen network uses hopping technology, if HSN or MAIO are set unreasonably, then co-channel interference or adjacent channel interference in one cell or among cells on the same MA List will be severe and then assignment failure rate will be very high. Generally, when this situation happens, all indicators will not be good. Check whether T3107 is set so strict that network has already released the channel because T3107 is overtime before it gets assignment completion message.

6Transmission fault on A interface or Abis interface If transmitting error rate is too high on A interface or Abis interface, then signaling exchange between MS and network can’t be accomplished normally, and then assignment failure happens.

7Impact from repeater Please refer to call drop analysis.

2.3 Solutions

1We shall check cell’s incoming handover execution failure rate for better locating the problem Ascertain whether handover failure rate ((handover execution – handover success) / handover execution) is related to assignment failure rate. It is because the process that MS establishes the second layer link with handover target cell is similar to the channel assignment process when call is set up.

2We shall check hardware fault when assignment failure rate is high (higher than 5%) If it may be TRX problem, operation and maintenance engineers shall check OMC-R alarm record (mostly a receiving module or transmitting module has problem). If there is no problem discovered in OMC-R, then use Abis interface monitor to find out the faulted TRX that causes assignment failure (equipment SN is TEI).

3Find out reason through cell’s link balance test Assignment failure may caused by uplink signal loss or receiving path failure. We can find out the reason through cell’s link balance test by Abis track analyzer or path test statistic.

4Eliminate interference Other situations occur when high assignment failure rate is caused by interference, such as lots of handovers triggered by quality problem (high BER), or too high RACH decoding level. We can find out system interior interference by carrying out DT. If uplink and downlink levels are high but signal quality is bad, then interference may exist. Then we check whether the occupied channel (BCCH TRX) is hopping or not. If BCCH TRX has interference, we re-plan the frequency of co-channel cell and adjacent channel cell. If there is no hardware fault but TRX voice quality is bad, then it means frequencies it uses have interference. One solution is to optimize cells that have the same MA list with the cell; another

solution is to suppose the cell isn’t in hopping mode and set TRX on each frequency on MA list, so as to find out frequencies get interference. Of course, network quality will be decreased if we use this solution, so we suggest using it on non-busy hour.

5Eliminate antenna problem If there is no interference or hardware problem but handover failure accompanies with assignment failure, we can check whether diversity antennas’ down tilt angles are different or antennas get blocked. If the assignment failure is severe but reason can’t be found temporarily, we shall turn off the cell to avoid network quality from getting serious impact.

6Check cell parameter setting status Modify parameters set improperly.

7Eliminate transmission problem Check whether transmission problem exists through testing error rate by instruments; if yes, solve the problem.

3 SDCCH/TCH congestion

3.1 Problem description

There are two kinds of congestions: one is that network has no signaling channel to use in immediate assignment; another is that network has no TCH to use in voice channel assignment. In this section we mainly analyze congestion problems as well as propose solutions and balance method to signaling load and traffic load. In immediate assignment, SDCCH assignment failure counter accumulates once BSC sends IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT REJECT according to command that channel can’t be activated. When there is no available SDCCH or ground resource on Abis interface, T3122 is included in IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT REJECT message sent by BSC to MS. T3122 defines the minimum interval for MS to set up the next call. Signaling flow is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6 SDCCH congestion signaling flow When assigning TCH, assignment failure occurs (reason is congestion)

Figure 6 SDCCH congestion signaling flow

When assigning TCH, assignment failure occurs (reason is congestion) if BSC has no resource when receives ASSIGN REQUEST or HO REQUIRED from MSC, or no available ground circuit resource when sends channel activation. If this happens, BSC sends ASSIGN FAILURE to MSC (reason is no radio resource), and TCH assignment failure counter accumulates once. Please refer to Figure 5. Through analysis, we can solve these two kinds of congestions separately.

3.2 Only SDCCH is congested 3.2.1 Common problem analysis

1LAC boundary problem If a cell locates on the boundary of LAC, then frequent LAC updating program triggers TCH congestion because the cell’s boundary may cross a high traffic area. When this situation happens, we can check that the cell hands over frequently into which cells with different LAC and BSC by observing its handoff status, and then optimize LAC (cut the cell over other LAC). If we use this method, we shall also take into account parameters related to C1, C2 algorithm, cell reselection hysteresis parameter and handover margin parameter, etc.

2Improper parameter configuration Too less signaling channels are configured; relevant parameters of C1, C2 algorithm are set improperly; T3101, T3122 and T3212 are set improperly.

3Hardware fault Faulted or unstable hardware such as TRX will trigger that BSC can’t activate the channel’s ground resource in immediate assignment.

4Neighbor cell fault Neighbor cell’s fault will cause server cell congestion because it absorbs some extra traffic.

5Illegal subscribers’ frequent registration Check whether congestion is triggered by frequent registration of some roam-restricted subscribers. If a roam-restricted subscriber enters a restricted area and keeps the mobile phone turning on, then the subscriber will try to register on the local network ceaselessly but always fails due to authentication failure. This will aggravate the signaling load and equal the subscriber occupies the capacity of a local signaling channel.

3.2.2 Measures for solving SDCCH congestion and sharing signaling load

1Increase the value of cell reselection hysteresis If SDCCH congestion is due to LAC boundary problem and the congestion is not severe, we can increase the value of cell reselection hysteresis, so as to decrease frequent MS location update as much as possible.

2Reconfigure channel type If the method mentioned above doesn’t have much effect, we can reconfigure TDMA according to TCH traffic status, like to change TCH time slot as SDCCH/8 while referring to the times that TCH used as signaling channel.

3Decrease T3101 Adjust T3101 to reduce system resource waste. Generally, immediate assignment can be accomplished within 3 seconds. Then we set T3101 as 3 seconds to avoid BSC from assigning resource because of resending channel request and to release resources that have been wasted for other requests.

4Adjust MAXretransmaximum retransmission timesOn the premise that the radio environment is favorable, we try to decrease MAXretrans to reduce system resource waste as much as possible. Generally we shall try to increase its value if cell’s load is normal.

5Adjust T3107 and T3103 We can reduce TCH waste by adjusting T3107 and T3103. On the premise that the radio environment is favorable, it only takes system about 2 seconds to assign TCH, so we can set the lowest T3107 as 2s. Generally we set both T3107 and T3103 as 5s.

6Adjust T3122

We can prevent subscribers from frequently sending channel request message which will increase network RACH and CCCH load by increasing T3122 when system has no resource (normally we set T3122 as 10s, or 30s when SDCCH traffic is very large). This timer shall be set as shorter as possible when channel’s traffic isn’t much big.

7Adjust relevant parameters impact C2 We can decrease the cell’s C2 by reducing the value of CELL RESELECT OFFSET (the premise is that C2 algorithm has to be activated). In this way, we can reduce the cell’s traffic and the difficulty for MS to select the cell as server cell, so as to make calls be set up in the cell’s neighbor cells as much as possible.

8Increase T3212 properly T3212 is used for limiting the time of periodical location update. We can alleviate SDCCH load from periodical location update by increasing T3212. But we shall be aware that its value has to be shorter than MSC connotative turning off time limit while modifying it. Connotative turning off time limit shall be set a little bit longer than “periodical location update”; otherwise, MS will be regarded to be turned off by the network if it doesn’t have any contact with the network during a period of time.

9Eliminate hardware fault Check whether cell and its neighbor cells are working normally. Check whether TCH is available to ascertain unstable equipment. If neighbor cell isn’t working normally, the cell will take the extra traffic.

3.3 TCH congestion

3.3.1 Common problem analysis

1Traffic density is higher than BTS designed capacity If TCH keeps congested during a period of time, it means subscriber group has changed that makes the BTS traffic density higher than the original designed capacity. As for this situation, the easiest solution is to expand capacity.

2Handover problem Unreasonable call model caused by too frequent handovers among cells will decrease system capacity. Ping Pong handover caused by boundary problem, coverage problem, interference, hardware fault or parameter problem will trigger TCH congestion. When system has interference or hardware problem, MS receiving level will be high but signal quality is bad. If this happens, MS may be handed over out due to bad signal quality and handed over in due to power budget reason, and then Ping Pong handover occurs.

Some similar situations happen such as MS can also be handed over out due to TA reason and handed over in due to power budget reason.

3Transmission problem If transmission breaks off for an instant or high error rate occurs on Abis interface, because the fault hasn’t been transmitted to BSC and ground circuit resource is unavailable when BSC is activating channel, it is counted as congestion. It is especially obvious after queuing function has been activated. This problem will also trigger severe incoming handover failure. Because MSC doesn’t know the BTS has transmission problem and still sends incoming handover request to the BSC, then consequently incoming handover request fails. BSC will also count this event as congestion. This problem will last till MS that try to handover in deletes the cell on handover cell list reported to the system.

4Isolated island problem When a cell’s coverage is isolated in an area, mostly the cell can’t find pre-defined neighbor cells, and then MS will always stay in the cell where call set up and can’t be handed over no matter how signal changes till call drops. We can take two measures to avoid this: the first measure is to adjust antenna of the isolated cell and eliminate isolated island phenomenon. We have to do tests many times to eliminate isolated island without influencing covered area, but tall building’s isolated island phenomenon still can’t be eliminated completely because of complexity of wave propagation. So the second measure is to define new neighbor cells for isolated cell. The principle for defining parameters is that isolated cell has the priority in location update and priority to be handed over in normal cells.

5Neighbor cell problem Please refer to SDCCH congestion analysis.

6Neighbor cell definition problem Neighbor cells are not defined completely prevents calls from timely handover out and then causes call drop.

7Improper parameter setting T3107 and T3103 are set too long, queuing parameter is unreasonable; handover threshold and handover margin are set unreasonably; the definition of cell’s minimum accessing level and BTS power are unreasonable.

8TCH is used as signaling channel Idle TCH is used as signaling channel due to lack of SDCCH. Then there is no resource available when MSC is assigning channels.

9Coverage problem These problems exist in urban areas:

Too large coverage caused by too high antenna height or unreasonable antenna down/up tilt angle; BS TXPWR MAX is set too high due to RXLEV ACCESS MIN is set too low; the BTS overlaps its neighbor cells because its coverage is perfect in some directions (such as in square, lake or highway) that makes some traffic can’t be handed over out normally and causes congestion due to too concentrated traffic.

10Hardware is instable Instable BTS equipment (like TRX) will impact channel’s availability and channel can’t be activated while assigning channel that will trigger congestion.

3.3.2 Measures for solving TCH congestion and sharing traffic load

1BTS capacity expansion If channel congestion is caused by limited capacity, then we shall calculate cell’s traffic requirement according to cell’s congestion rate and practical loaded traffic, and increase corresponding radio resource in the planning.

2Prevent Ping Pong handover Within the T3103 time limit, TCH of both server cell and target cell will be occupied at the same time during the handover, so too many handovers will waste resource. Then possibly we shall reduce handover times especially when resource is tight. If the ratio of handover times to total call times is too high, we can avoid unnecessary Ping Pong handover by increasing cell’s handover power margin. Possibly algorithm for Ping Pong handover control shall also be activated in proper situation. For instance, if the outgoing handover is because of quality reason, then incoming handover due to power budget shall be refused in a period of time. We shall pay special attention to it in dual band handover.

3Activate queuing function Queuing function has obvious effect for solving congestion caused by temporary traffic summit.

4Adjust T3103 and T3107 Decrease time limits of T3107 and T3103 to reduce system resource waste as much as possible.

5Control SDCCH congestion When SDCCH is not enough, BSC will use TCH to transmit signaling. Therefore if TCH congestion is caused by lack of SDCCH, we shall control SDCCH congestion by the method mentioned above.

6Eliminate neighbor cell faults Check whether there are faults exist in neighbor cells, find out undefined cells through DT and neighbor cell parameter checking.

7Shrink BTS coverage If congestion is caused by too large BTS coverage, then we can increase RXLEV ACCESS MIN and decrease BS TXPWR MAX according to practical situation.

9C2 algorithm optimization If a cell is severely congested but its surrounding cells are relatively idle, we can optimize the cell’s traffic load through adjusting parameter PT and CRO (set CRO as minus bias) after C2 algorithm has been activated. We can also low the cell’s priority (set CELL BAR QUALITY as 1), this is equal to shrink the access range of the cell’s RACH into an area that only the cell can cover, so that part traffic will be shared. Meanwhile, we shall increase its neighbor cell’s C2 and handover margin to avoid shared traffic from being handed over in again.

10Adjust antenna’s installation height as well as down tilt angle and up tilt angle Possibly control BTS coverage by adjusting antenna’s installation height as well as down tilt angle and up tilt angle, so as to optimize traffic load. But we shall prevent blind area from appearing.

11Eliminate equipment fault Repair faulted equipment if it is the reason for incomplete channel utilization.

4 Analysis of handover failure rate

4.1 Problem description

From view of signaling, handover failure could be divided into two aspects: handover selection failure and handover execution failure. Let’s make deep analysis. Signaling procedure is illustrated in Figure 9.

Figure 9 handover failure procedure Handover selection failure ( HANDOVER SELECTION FAILURE ) is the

Figure 9 handover failure procedure

Handover selection failureHANDOVER SELECTION FAILUREis the difference between amount of HO COMMAND from BSC to BTS and amount of HO INDICATION received by BSC. The reasons of handover failure sometimes are channel resource absence of target cell, or system parameters or hardware issues (viz. difficult L2 connection between BSC and BTS). Handover execution failureHANDOVER EXECUTION FAILUREis the difference between amount of HO COMMAND from BSC to BTS and amount of HO COMPLETE received by BSC. This reflects the quality of radio interface in the air. When handover succeeds, MS will send HO COMPLETE message to target cell. After target cell receives the message, one handover-in success will be counted; if this handover is INTRA MSC handover, after originating BSC receives CLEAR COMMAND message (this message includes clear reason which is handover success), one handover-out will be counted. When MS could not capture target cell channel, which results in handover failure, due to radio matters, MS will send handover failure message to handover originating cell. After this, MSC send CLEAR REQUEST to target BSC, the message includes clear reason which is handover failure. And then, one handover-in failure will be counted.

4.2 Common failure analysis and solution

1Hardware failure

When handover execution failure rate is very high, hardware failure is most possible (see allocation failure). Here, we have to locate failure hardware by traffic analysis, and dispose well in time.

2Neighbor cell relationship issue In dedicated mode, MS send measurement report to system by SACCH, and distinguish different cell RX power level with BCCH and BSIC. If two cells have same BSIC and BCCH, in normal situation, the distance between the two cells should be far enough, so nothing should be between them. But due to isolated cell environment, MS often send inveracious report to system, this inveracious neighbor cell report will misguide handover control program send handover injunction, it will cause connections in cell attempt sending handover request to cell with low RX power level, named ping-pong handover, and result in higher handover-out failure rate from isolated cell to target cell. On the other hand, higher handover-in failure rate will appear at target cell which has the same BSIC and BCCH with isolated cell. Due to compact frequency reuse in urban, it sometimes results in isolated effectiveness. The principle how to judge isolated point is, that observes whether advantaged radio propagation environment exists between isolated point C and Cell A, for example: higher antenna height and small down tilt for Cell C, open land, highway and river between Cell A and Cell C, etc.

open land, highway and river between Cell A and Cell C, etc. Figure 10 isolated effectiveness

Figure 10 isolated effectiveness

In the area of city boundary, when more INTRA-MSC handover failure happens, and excludes other possible failures, here check whether frequency change on boundary neighbor cell, which results in isolated effectiveness. For a pair of neighbor cells, if higher handover execution failure due to isolated effectiveness, Abis interface test could be done to find isolated cell by checking time ahead (TA). Then bigger down tilt could abate isolated effectiveness, or change BSIC to eliminate same BCCH/BSIC. Check whether neighbor cell table matches BTS parameters, if not, modification should be done in OMC-R.

3Neighbor cell channel resource absence or transmission failure If handover selection failure rateHO SELECTION FAILURE RATEis very high, it is possible that the load of target cell is very heavy, and without available TCH. Here BSC receives HO INDICATION message, but handover could not be executed. For higher handover selection failure rate between a pair of neighbor cells, check whether it is the load problem of target cell. When transmission failure happens in neighbor cell (e.g. higher BER or transmission instantaneous break), BSC has available resource, but terrain circuit resource could not be

activated, therefore, results in handover selection failure. If transmission failure happens between intra MSC handover or inter MSC handover, the problem will be more serious. Because MSC does not know transmission failure between BSC and BTS, if handover request happens, it will cause channel allocation request is sent to target BSC, and results in handover failure. This problem will continue until originating BSC does not receive MS measurement report about target cell. If neighbor cell channel resource absence results in handover failure, we could refer to solution of TCH/SDCCH congestion. In addition, configuring handover request priority higher than allocation request priority is also an effective solution for handover selection failure problem.

4Terrible radio environment If handover execution failure rateHANDOVER EXECUTION FAILURER RATEis high, it is possible radio environment problem of target cell or originating cell. Terrible radio environment will cause that MS could not receive handover command from originating cell, or capture channel allocated by target cell. Normally, the reason of terrible radio environment is overlap coverage absence between cells. We could check coverage prediction, especially some special places (e.g. tunnel, etc), once have suspicion, it is better to confirm it by drive test and use relevant radio optimization approaches to improve coverage. Reducing down tilt and adding antenna height could improve cell coverage, but this could also introduce much adjacent interference. Fundamental method is to add sites or micro cells, but this is out of optimization.

5Coverage issue If there is not enough overlap coverage between originating cell and target cell (shown in Figure 11), handover could fail because MS is not able to capture TCH of target cell. In the situation, replacement is difficult with lower probability. If make sure terrible coverage results in failure, we have to use relevant approaches to improve overlap coverage.

Figure 11 terrible coverage results in handover failure

6Interference issue If interference exists, it is difficult for MS to capture TCH of target cell. And here, RX power level is better, but uplink / downlink signal quality is terrible. If handover-in execution failure rate is high, it is necessary to check cell interference. Checking handover-in and handover-out execution failure rate of every pair of cells could indicate interference exists in single cell or in multi-cell, and further estimate interference area and interference property. If handover-out execution failure rate is high, probably downlink interference exists in originating cell, MS could not decode HANDOVER COMMAND message from BTS, here T3103 time out results in call drop. The reason of higher handover-out execution failure rate may be due to downlink / uplink interference in target cell. Therefore, it is necessary to check every indicator of every pair of cells to help estimating interference, at the same time check correlation between

handover-in execution failure rate and allocation failure rate of target cell. Higher handover failure rate caused by interference always accompanies high allocation failure rate. To confirm cell interference, proportion of handover due to uplink / downlink quality could be estimated. If confirming cell interference, change cell frequency in time or eliminate interference source.

7Antenna issue Due to obstruction before antenna or two antennae coverage asymmetry of the same cell, for solution, please see allocation failure analysis.

8Repeater issue for analysis and solution, please see call drop analysis.

9Parameters issue Due to inconsequent or mismatch parameters, e.g. configuring T3103 with a small number results in MS could not capture channel if target cell. If parameter description of neighbor cell about LAC and CI of target cell, it will result in higher handover selection failure rate.

10Incomplete LAC list of MSC If the definition of REMOTELAC table of MSC faultiness or error, and there is MSC boundary cell definition on BSS side, it will result in handover selection failure. When handover request reaches MSC, MSC finds LAC does not belong to itself, MSC will search in remote LAC table. If remote LAC table has no information about LAC, it will result in handover failure. When executing INTER MSC continuous handover, if there is no definition of LAC of target MSC in originating MSC, it will result in handover failure.

11Higher signaling link load impact Due to congestion caused by heavy load on interface A, there is no available resource when sending handover request and handover command between intra MSC or inter MSC. In this situation, trunk link capacity should be expanded.

5 Handover reason proportion analysis

5.1 Proportion of handover triggered by bad downlink quality is high

5.1.1 Problem description

It is one of the rescue handovers and it’s different from normal power handover. Rescue handover is carried out not because a server cell with stronger signal has been discovered, but because the

present server cell’s signal quality is too bad to support normal call. Handover triggered by bad downlink quality is carried out because server cell’s signal quality is too bad (high error rate). If the original BSC decides that voice quality error rate has reach the downlink quality handover threshold, then it will choose a cell with the strongest signal as the target cell for incoming handover from well-performed neighbor cells. Therefore the handover is only carried out when voice quality error rate is higher than L RXQUAL DL H.

5.1.2 Common fault analysis

1Unreasonable handover parameter If L RXQUAL DL H is set too low, then it’s very easy for voice quality error rate to reach quality handover threshold. If handover algorithm judging period is too short, then quality handover will take place even just a few samplings are lost.

2Hardware problem It may be downlink hardware problem if handover failure rate is high, such as BTS transmitter, power amplifier, transmitting antenna or feeder has problem.

3GSM interference Check whether co-channel interference or adjacent channel interference exists. If there is severe interference inside system, quality handover will also be triggered during the call because of bad voice quality even if subscriber can occupy the assigned channel. But quality handover usually causes Ping Pong handover: if quality handover is triggered by interference, then commonly the original cell’s signal strength is high but quality is bad; therefore MS will be handed over back into the original cell again because of power budget even if it was handed over out due to quality reason.

5.1.3 Solutions

1Parameter checking Check whether cell handover parameter is set properly.

2Eliminate hardware problem If there is downlink hardware problem, for instance, too small transmitting power of some TRX, it will make receiving signal’s strength and quality of MS that uses the TRX is bad. If this situation happens, high downlink level handover will accompany high downlink quality handover. Therefore, we can check traffic change as well as the ratio of incoming handover to outgoing handover. Downlink hardware problem will also make downlink quality handover, assignment failure, radio link failure increase and much higher than those of other cells. Some downlink hardware problems will be shown in VSWR alarm in OMC-R. Solutions are: track Abis interface, check whether

uplink and downlink are balanced, check downlink level status, measure VSWR of BTS, as well as check cables in transmitter.

3Eliminate GSM system internal interference 1Track Abis interface. Abis analysis software can find out downlink TRX with high level and bad quality; 2) Observe OMC-R traffic report. If the cell’s traffic is high, then uplink quality handover will also be very high; 3Analyze cell’s planning figure. Try to find out interfering cell (the interference may not be caused by neighbor cells, we shall be aware that it is possibly because of isolated island phenomenon). If the interference is newly-appeared, it may be related to newly-added BTS; 4Ascertain interference by DT; 5Turn off interfering cell and check whether the interference disappears, so as to ascertain interference source.

5.2 Proportion of handover triggered by bad uplink quality is high

5.2.1 Problem description

It is one of the emergence handovers, carried out if server cell’s uplink signal is too bad. The target for outgoing handover is a cell with strongest BCCH signal among well-performed neighbor cells. Handover trigger threshold is L RXQUAL UL H, which is network uplink quality handover threshold.

5.2.2 Common Fault Analysis

1Too strict parameter setting This makes MS easily reach the threshold of handover caused by quality and handover become frequent. 2Facility fault If uplink handover times is great, it may probably caused by the hardware of radio uplink transmission facilities (TRX, antenna, diversity and feeder). 3Coverage problem Check whether it relates to handover caused by uplink and downlink power level. If it’s the caseit may be result from inadequate coverage. 4Uplink interference See whether uudecoded RACH level is too great in OMC-R traffic statistics report, if so, the fault may caused by uplink interference. Take DT to see whether there are interference in the cell. 5GSM interference

When there is interference is GSM system, handover caused by voice quality will be considerably large.

5.2.3 Troubleshooting

1Parameter checking Check the parameters of cell handover. 2Check the hardware If there are problems concerning uplink hardware, loss of cell or some TRX will be great. At the same time, we shall check the failure rate of handover in. Because if uplink BER is high, even if the downlink is normal, handover can be hard to carry out. If there are problems concerning the uplink, handover due to uplink power level, assignment failure and RL failure will be more than normal cell. 3Eliminate external interference Take the following measures to make sure whether it’s caused by BCCH uplink interference:

check related RACH demodulation level; analyze and check GSM uplink frequency band using spectrum analyzer in BTS; track Aibs; check uplink & downlink balance and uplink distributed level ; check BTS transmission cable etc. 4Eliminate GSM interior interference Please refer to the cause of handover due to downlink quality.

5.3 Big proportion of handover due to downlink level

1description

This handover is an emergency one due to the signaling of serving cell is lower than normal call requirements. The target is the adjacent cell with strong BCCH signaling. noteif handover parameter setting is unreasonable, the cell which handover is implemented out to is hard to find. Otherwise PBGT handover will be processed. Thus this kind of handover failure rate is great. Alarm threshold is L RXLEV DL H, that is, network downlink level threshold. 2Common Fault Analysis This is not usually seen and it’s caused mainly by the following reasons1parameter setting is improper2downlink hardware problem

3Troubleshooting

It’s the same with handover due to downlink quality caused by problems of parameter and hardware.

5.4

Big

proportion

of

handover

due

to

uplink

level

This handover is an emergency type which is invoked when signaling level of the serving cell is lower than normal call. The target is the adjacent cell with the strongest BCCH signaling. Note: if handover parameter setting is reasonable, the cell which handover is implemented out to is hard to find. Otherwise PBGT handover will be processed. Thus this kind of handover failure rate is great. Alarm threshold is L RXLEV UL Hthat is, network downlink level threshold. 2Phenomenon analysis 1inadequate coverage is accompanied by much handover due to uplink quality; 2cell handover parameter setting is improper3hardware problem if uplink & downlink is imbalance4Ping-pong handover between two cells. For example, handover in to the adjacent cell with lower level due to quality and back to the previous cell due to PBDG or level

3troubleshooting

1parameter. check the handover parameters of related cell including power handover tolerance, power level handover threshold, and minimum access level 2hardware. check the hardware using the following methods: make Abis track, check cell link budget and special attention shall be given to balance of uplink & downlink. 3coverage or adjacent cells. Check the definition of adjacent cells of related sites is consistent with coverage predictions. Check whether there are a great proportion of handover between adjacent cells due to quality. If there are ping-pong handover of adjacent cells, interference shall be kept in control. Please refer to quality handover& interference chapter; If isolated island or coverage problem is not found via TA gotten by Abis track, DT is needed to solve the problem.

5.5 big proportion of handover due to distance

1Problem description This handover is an emergent one due to large distance between site and MS. The threshold is MS RANGE MAX, which is the maximum distance between sites and MS. Notice: the priority of handover due to distance is lower than handover due to quality and level, as a result, when handover due to distance is triggered, level and quality shall all below the threshold. We can reduce isolated island effectively by setting the distance threshold. Noticegreat proportion handover due to distance indicated that the coverage scope of this cell is greater than MS RANGE MAXit may be caused by too high antenna, broad terrain and high building etc.2Common fault analysis 1parameter MS RANGE MAX is too small ( notice: this unit of this parameter is TA(time advancement. 1 represents 500m instead of 1km) 2isolated island3definition of adjacent cell is wrong Power handover haven’t be implemented when MS is moving away from the site into the region that is not covered.

1check whether it’s due to the smallness of the parameter of handover due to distance 2check whether there is malfunction cell3check other indications such as RL failure or handover failure.4make Abis track to see whether there is isolated island.

6 RACH access validity

6.1 description

Valid RACH access is the process from MP sending RACH REQUEST to the completion of SDCCH establishment. Please refer to Figure 12.

of SDCCH establishment. Please refer to Figure 12. Figure 12 RACH access signaling process 6.2 Common

Figure 12 RACH access signaling process

6.2 Common fault

1RACH power level is high and can’t be demodulated (noise RACH level is high) and BTS can’t be decoded (information is wrongly coded);2RACH request times is low which is obviously 3RACH demodulation rate is lowRACH sends to BSC / all RACH); 4LapDm establishment success rate is lowLapDm success /SDCCH assignment number); 5excessive invalid RACH channel requestRACH CHANNEL REQUEST)。

6.3 Common fault analysis

1The most frequently-seen fault is BCCH uplink interference. When BCCH uplink interference is severe, BTS can’t decode RACH access request information(information is wrongly coded) .

2hardware of receiving path. 3uplink & downlink imbalance will affect signaling process after RACH is demodulated. 4parameter is inappropriately defined. For example, “ minimum access power level”RXLEV ACCESS MINis set to be too high. 5RACH decoded power is too high. When radio condition is consistent with normal propagation model, if signaling level is high than BTS sensitivityBTS can demodulate RACH bursts received. When there is no interference, BTS sensitivity is decided by noise coefficient and thermal noise power and is -115dBm(not taking fading tolerance into consideration). Uplink interference and block will disable minimum demodulation level to reach -115dBm. In the cities, because the propagation ambience is complicated, BTS demodulation ability will be affected by background noise and reduced to -100-110dBm. 6SDCCH establishment success rate is low. Only small number of MS SDCCH channel requests are successful . There are two possibilities:

Main reason: BTS receiving path loss is severecable, receiving separator, and connector),thus receiving bursts from MS can’t reach BTS or is lower than demodulation level.<-110 dBmAnother reason: RACH short bursts can be demodulated, and level required by LapDm can’t be successfully established. It maybe caused by the low uplink receiving level or interference.

6.4 Troubleshooting

1Confirm the time when error occurs Check the time when RACH access failed and whether it still exists and is caused by incident. 2Make sure whether it’s caused by hardware or interference Compare the following running status: handover in, establish requests, and assign requests. If it’s caused by BCCH uplink interference, it will not affect handover greatly, and RACH demodulation level and channel assignment success rate will be reduced. If it’s caused by hardware, access success rate will be very low. 3Eliminate hardware malfunction If there is hardware error in uplink, network will not be able to assign channels responding to MS channel requests. In this case, check site hardware, especially TRX, antenna and feeder. If the problem is not sure, do Abis analysis and check link budget. 4Eliminate interference If the problems don’t lie in hardware and connection, then there is great possibility that it’s caused by interference. Check whether there is newly-added RF equipment around the cell based on the time that error arises and the duration. Check frequency scheme to make sure that there is no intra- frequency interference and adjacent cell interference. If it’s the case, modify BCCH frequency to see whether RACH level is changed also. If it’s necessary, do DT, use spectrum analyzer or RF receptor to check the features of interference signaling. Please refer to interference chapter. 5Remove the effect of repeater Attention shall be given to wideband repeater. The function of wideband repeater is to enhance network coverage and is mainly used in suburbs and rural areas. In the cities, indoor repeater is mainly used for coverage of large buildings and basements. The usage of repeaters will change the coverage condition, so coverage range shall be controlled. Interference will not be caused

in the area with no signaling from other sites, but the balance of uplink & downlink shall be guaranteed. In the cities the repeater will cause great interference especially uplink interference. If the equipment is good, most problems of RACH inefficiency is caused by the interference from the repeaters. So if repeater is needed, closed circuit repeaters are strongly recommended or install narrow-beam antenna beside the site to control transmission power.

7 No traffic or handover in the cell

7.1 description

Compare to normal cells, there are few handover or none, few establishment requests or none, few assignment requests or none. If there are no attempt calls, make sure where error occurs using traffic statistics report, such as SDCCH fail, no RACH request, RACH access fail and TCH establishment fail. The first three faults may make traffic of initial calls and traffic of handover in of the cell low.

7.2 Common fault analysis and troubleshooting

1Parameters are not appropriately set Check CELL BAR ACCESS to see whether this cell is barredif it’ s the case, the traffic of this cell are mostly handover in calls. Check if the setting of CI and LAC of this cell is consistent with the setting of exchange. If it’s inconsistent, the call path establishment will fail and therefore, the traffic of the cell are mainly handover in calls. If there are no handover in traffic, check whether adjacent cell is correctly defined and handover is allowed in the system; Check the definition of LAC of the malfunction cell coupled with MSC of the adjacent cell. 2Hardware fault Do Abis track, check the hardware by checking link budget. If exchange matrix control panel, transmission control panel and control panel of corresponding BSC breaks down, MS will fail to initial calls. If transmission power and receiving sensitivity of the carrier of this cell is low, MS will be unable to use the channel assigned. It may be caused by the problem in antenna, feeder, coupler, receiving divider and receptor etc. 3Antenna error The antenna is blocked and thus calls established in this cell are few. Currently there are many residential areas in the sites, antenna is in mast shape and the first sector of many sites is toward rectangle roof, which makes it hard to absorb the traffic even in high-traffic region. When this happens, antenna parameters like height, direction angle and pitch angle shall be adjusted.

8. call successful rate

call connection rate is the indicator to evaluate network running performance. The following is the factors to affect long-distance call connection rate. Paging overtime; user busy; no response from the user; telecommunication link establishment fail(line is busy, TCH channel busy or TCH assignment fail)the definition of parameters of BSC and MSC causes overtime of the paging; dialing incomplete number. We will make analysis of the above problems in the following report.

8.1 PAGING TIMEOUT

Paging timeout indicates that MSC sends paging message successfully and in fixed time MSC doesn’t get response from MS. Paging overtime is the important factor that affects long-distance call connection rate and the reasons are many. Paging handling is classified into two levels: one is MSC, and the other BTS. MSC is responsible for sending paging messages and to avoid bad radio condition of MS, MSC will resend it again, the interval is 10 seconds. BTS will place paging messages to certain paging group according to CCCH assignment of this cell and will resend it to avoid the relay caused by uncoding of the message in PCH because of interference. The main factors are as follows: (1MP subscriber enters blind spots or MP powers off. If the time for exchange’s area periodic upgrading is not reached (MSC will timely inquire the user of IMSI ATTACH and will set MS that doesn’t communicate with the system to be in power-off status), MSC will continue to send paging messages to this subscriber which will result in paging overtime and waste of system resources. We can make optimization the parameters of T3212 and the parameters of T3212 and exchange hidden power-off in order to enhance connection rate. BSC area periodic update timer T3212 must be later than hidden power-off timer in MSC. Under this premise, we can make settings of T3212 freely. In some suburban and rural areas, the blind spots and region with weak signaling are many, therefore we can set T3212 to be small. For example, set T3212 to be 8which means area upgrading every 48 minutes. But in urban area, considering the considerable great average traffic and signaling flow, T3212 shall not be small, otherwise signaling flow will be added greatly and thus adds to MSC load and finally reduces paging success rate. If MSC hidden power-off time is set to be too short, on one hand, it will improve paging success rate, on the other hand, it will cause some subscribes to be in power-off status because of some subscribers’ long-time disconnection with the system. If hidden power-off time is set to be too long, user area periodic update times will be added and thus improve paging success rate; at the same time, one problem may occur. Because user stays in blind spots for long time(time is shorter than hidden power-off time) and is still in ATTACH status in MSC and when the user is being called, VLR will allocate the user with MSRN, which will result in an effective paging and thus reduce paging success rate. Therefore, the setting of T3212 and hidden power-off time makes difference for paging success rate, and shall be made based on analysis of traffic statistics and BSC & MSC parameters.

We shall also make optimization of TRX maximum transmission power and MS minimum access power levelRXLEV ACCESS MINetc , adjust antennae and build new sites to enhance network coverage. 2lack of signaling channel of the cell in which MS being called, RACH access failure of user being called, SDCCH assignment failure and SDCCH call drop can all lead to one of the following results: RACH access failure, signaling channel of access cell busy and call drop on SDCCH during signaling link establishment, which will make MSC to fail to receive paging response messages and finally result in paging overtime. In this case we shall use traffic statistics to find cells of which signaling channels are congested and which severe failure of immediate assignment exists. For the cells with congested SDCCH, PCH, RACH and AGCHwe can adjust related parameters and number of related signaling channels (refer to the handling of SDCCH congestion) based on requirements in order to reduce congested cell and improve PAGING success rate. As for the cells with many immediate assignment failures, we can check whether it’s caused by interference, equipment hardware error, improper parameters or feeder error etc. In the process of optimization, we can set T3122 (wait indication duration) to be as short as possible so as to enhance network average access performance. Raise MAXRETRANS “maximum resend time” as much as possible which is a key parameter to improve accessibility rateand can be set according to traffic volume of the cell. Also, we shall make optimization of BS AG BLKS RES, BS PA MFRMS and TX INTEGER in order to improve the responding capability of MS toward the system.

8.2 Communication link establishment fail

It refers to the call failure after the RR establishment between MS and the network caused by authentication failure, radio call loss, TCH congestion, TCH assignment failure, lack of ground resources of A interface or Abis interface . 1Call loss may occur due to radio problem during the time from MSC sending SETUP message to BSC to BSC sending back CALL CONFIRMED message. If the call loss is too great, we can do track of signaling of A interface and find worse cell based on OMC-R report and get help from site personnel. 2During the period from MSC getting CALL CONFIRED message from BSC to MSC sending assign TCH request message to BSC, call establishment may fail caused by TCH congestion of target cell due to lack of exchange resources. Therefore, we shall pay attention to TCH congestion of the cells in the network and signaling load of A interface in order to avoid the circumstance. 3During the period from MSC sending TCH assignment request to BSC to BSC resending TCH assignment success message, call establishment may fail due to failure of TCH assignment. 4During the period from getting message from BSC to BSC sending ANC message to TMSC, call loss may occur caused by one of the following reasons: the calling MS hangs up, no response from MP, disconnection due to overtime and the called MS hangs up. It’s hard to resolve for the user. We shall check whether instability of signaling or transmission exists in MSC and resolve it immediately.

9. reason and troubleshooting of coverage lessening of the sites

It’s not only related to system technical indicators such as system frequency, sensitivity and power, but also has direct relationship with engineering quality, geographical status and electromagnetic environment. Generally when indicators of the system is stable, the environment is bad, and engineering quality is not up to the standard, the coverage area of the site may be small.

9.1 reason on sites side and troubleshooting

The factors that affect the coverage due to the sites are: output power of transmitter reduces, sensitivity of receptors lessens, directional angle of the antenna tilts, pitch angle of the antenna changes; antenna gain changes; antenna height varies; feeder loss, coupler loss, working frequency changes, propagation environment (terrain and human environment) changes and diversity receptor effect etc. To sum up, 1check whether it is due to the growing of reversing leakout pf directional antenna, which will make forward output power become weaker and finally narrow the coverage area of the cell. It’s recommended to change the antenna. 2check whether there are other antenna or buildings that block the antenna. They will affect reception and transmission of the antenna and thus affect the coverage of the site. In this case, adjust the directional angle or height of the antenna to avoid the bad effect. 3check whether the performance of the inclination or direction angle changes. The enlargement of the inclination or offset of the direction will narrow the coverage of the site, which shall be handled once being found. 4Check whether output power of site receptor or the coupler is descending. If so, adjust the power of the amplifier or change hardware equipment. If not, we shall check whether it’s caused by leakage of the signaling due to bad connection of the downlink hardware units. 5check whether the loss of the feeder is increasing. We can use apparatus to measure standing wave ratio. If it’s less than 1.5, it may be caused by feeder connector or leakage of the feeder which reduces the transmission power and the coverage of the sites. 6make sure whether it’s due to capacity enlargement. If it’s the case, check the following1whether different types of couplers are used. Different type has different loss which we shall pay special attention to. 2After operation or capacity enlargement of the site, check whether the installation of the new antenna is up to the requirements; If the distance between MS and tower is near, the tower may block the antenna; check the height of the antenna. If it’s too high, it may lead to dark-down-tower; if it’s tow low, it may make the coverage narrower; check whether the inclination of the antenna is reasonable; check whether the coverage of the major antenna and diversity is consistent. For inconsistency will affect the coverage effect which leads to call drop, assignment failure and hand over failure and finally results in narrow coverage of the sites.

3check the receiving sensitivity of the sites If the sensitivity decreases, the coverage of the site will become weaker. 7check whether RACH decoding level varies. If it changes greatly, the signaling from MS may not reach the site. 8check whether interference exists. Strong interference will reduce receiving sensitivity of the site and thus affect the site coverage. 9eliminate the electromagnetic interference . If the electromagnetic interference is great, it will affect SNR, which will affect communication of long-distance subscriber.

9.2 Others

1Signaling block New buildings block the propagation of the electromagnetic wave and make the signaling become weak and users in far area can’t use normally. The high buildings near the sites will have greatest effect on the propagation. 2Propagation ambience changes The change of propagation environment of electromagnetic makes the receiving signaling fade. Especially in mountainous region, the propagation there rely much on the reflection of the hills and if the plantation changes, the signaling may fade and can’t reach the user. 3Technical indicator of the terminal descends The descending of the MS power and sensitivity may affect the reception of the radio signaling. The feeder which is used to transmit signaling and the connector shall be in good condition. We can seen from the above that the descending of the site coverage is caused by many reasons. Thus we shall make daily maintenance and do troubleshooting timely to guarantee smooth running of the system.

10 analysis and troubleshooting of hot issues

10.1

terminating

MS

has

signaling

but

when

it’s

terminated, it tells that user is not in the serving area

MSC paging MS and if in fixed time, it doesn’t get PAGING RESPOSE from the user, it will replay user is not in serving area recording and handle it in another way. In fact there are many causes such as the user entering blind spot or MS power off. VMSC hasn’t make periodic query of the IMSI attach user and can’t confirm the status of the MS which results in paging failure. The malfunction are as follows:

1. Signaling channel of the cell which terminating MS is in is very busy

After MS receiving the paging, it will away from idle state and sends channel request to the standing cell. BSC receives this request and hasn’t channel to assign and send assignment refuse

message to MS and padding fails. When MSC寻呼超时PAGING TIMEOUT)后,it

will send recording notification(user is not in serving area) to originating user or handle it in other wayreplay busy tone etcWe can see whether the signaling channel of the cell is congested or unavailable. If this happens, MS will receive immediate assignment refuse message. In this case, it’s even hard for MS to make originating calls. 2Terminating MS immediate assignment fail When MS is being paged, if channel assigned by the network is unavailableradio environment is bad due to interferenceor equipment errorfeeder, major equipment or transmitter becomes unstable or errormakes immediate fail, it will make MSC paging overtime. When this happens, check whether the difference between RACH request number immediate assignment success number is considerably bigsubtract RACH resend timeusing traffic statistics. MS being paged can’t get immediate assignment command after sending channel request or can’t get response from the system after sending SABMPAGING RESPONSE. In this case, it’s hard even for MS to be originating. 3Terminating user RACH access fail When terminating MS sends channel request on RACH, network can’t decode it due to radio interference or equipment error(generally one control channel in this cell error) and paging times out. When this happens, check whether RACH requests is less than TCH assignment times. If it’s the case, MS can’t enter this cell and can only use TCH of this cell by handover in. In this condition, regardless of MS to be originating or terminating, MS will resume idle status(in 1- 2 seconds) because network can’t assign channels which results in T3216 overtime and make cell reselection. 4Area update of terminating MS resulting in paging failure When MS being paged is doing area update(normal location update & periodic location update)this MS can’t make responsebecause location update is invoked and other program can’t be invoked at the same time. Measures may be taken to counteract this situation are:

1increase cell reselection lag value, and the difficulty for location update; 2optimizing location area is the most effective way to handle it. The time for MS to do location update is generally 3.5s. In this case, there are many incidences happen along the border. 5Terminating MS CCCH decoding fail Due to severe downlink interference in BCCH frequency, MS fails to decode CCCH of the paging group. This case is few. 6System is overloaded with paging When system is overloaded with paging and paging channel of the cell which MS is in is too few, MSC may lose MS paging message. 7NSS malfunction Due to location updating or VLR database fault, MSC fails to page MS.

10.2 MS has signaling but is implicitly power-off when being paged

This happens when T3212 (periodical location update timer) is bigger or equals to MSC implicit power-off time, MSC consider MS is power-off due to no response from it. We shall pay attention to the setting of T3212. When T3212 is less than implicit power-off , reducing T3212 will deduct system load and enhance the sensitivity of the network to MS status . But improper value will add to user’s complaints (MS has signaling but is implicitly power-off when being paged). Please see the following descriptions:

Set time for implicit power-off to be 1 h, T3212 of cell A to be 40.4h),T3214 of cell B to be 8(0.8h) and the two cells are in the same location area. Set MS location update status in A to be 3/4and MS make cell reselection to be B and status becomes 3/8, if MS stays in B for a time, MS status will return to 3/8. In this case, although T3212 of these two cells is less than MSC implicit power-off time, time to make location update is later than the time of implicit power-off, thus this user is considered to be power-off.

10.3 MS signaling unstable in idle state

When we are handling complaints, we find many come from MP instability. Weak signaling is related to receiving strength instead of algorithm. Besides unavoidable factors such as multi-path effect and environment factor etc, the causes may be as follows:

1Equipment fault When BCCH transceiver power amplifier works unsteadily, transmission power is instable and thus the signaling is instable. 2Reselection parameter 重选参数影响 Adjusting C2 may bring bad results: during network optimization, C2 needs to be adjusted to balance the traffic. Cell reselection is based on C2, and MS signaling fluctuates with practical receiving level. If two measured C2 of the two cells is close and practical receiving levels are far, cell reselection will frequently happen and make MS signaling fluctuate in idle state. Especially in the place where micro-cell and dual-band exist, the problem becomes even severe due to difficulty to define reselection coefficient. In border area, due to the effect brought by cell reselection hysteresis, signaling may fluctuate when MS is doing location update. 3Coverage reason

when signaling of cell C drifts to cell A, if cell A defines cell B as its adjacent celland the frequency of cell B and C are the same, MS standing in A may select cell C. At this time, MS will monitor BA(BCCHtable broadcast by Cell Cfrequency of cell A may not in the table, and signaling of BCCH tends to be weak, therefore, MS may not receive drift signaling of cell C and will make cell reselection again. This will make signaling fluctuate.

10.4

Signaling fluctuate during MS making calls

1Equipment malfunction If TCH and BCCH of MS don’t belong to one carrier, and the transceiver works unsteadilysignaling is weak),signaling of MS in idle state will appear strong but is weak during communication. 2Problems brought by handover When MS handover is frequent, signaling of MS may fluctuate. When adjacent cells of handover are too many, frequency samplings in BA table for MS may be less and results in incorrect measurement level and frequent handover.

10.5 Echo in MS communication

Causes are:

1Echo suppressor(ECerror EC is placed between PLMN and PSTN. So if the subscribers of these network complain about echo during communication, it’s probably caused by EC error. 2TCU error Tch is responsible for rate transferring adaptation, so if it error, echo will occur. 3Subscriber MP error In the process from MS voice coding to radio wave sending, if relevant hardware error, echo will occur. 4Propagation circuit Due to careless maintenance of A interface and Abis interface, loop or cutover may caused which may result in echo. 5BTS hardware error BTS is responsible for the whole process(demodulation, burst and channel decoding ect) exclusive of voice decoding, if one hareware error, echo may occur. 6Update and patch If system update and patch are inconsistent with current system hardware, echo may occur. It’s suggested to do dialing test to check the compatibility of the system.

10.6 Other

1When MS originates calls and returns to idle state, MS can’t dial in a while. It’s because MS receives immediate assignment refuse messagedue to signaling channel congestionwhich includes refuse connect timer T3122thus MS is hard to get access to the network 2Bad voice quality when MS is making calls When MS is making calls with PSTN subscribervoice quality of MS is bad while the other party is fair (receiving level is high), there may be error or interference in downlink of the standing cell of MS. So, check downlink hardwaretransceiver ,frame processor, combiner and

feeder etcfirstthen use traffic statistics to check whether there are too many handover of downlink handover due to quality. When voice quality of PSTN subscriber is bad, it may be caused by uplink error or interference of MS standing cell. Check uplink hardware such as transceiver, frame processor, combiner and feeder etc If it happens between two MS, two network situation shall be taken into consideration.

11 typical measures

11.1 Case one

1Error

case

analysis

and

optimization

One suburb site is in S777 model and adopt 13 hopping. Call drop of three-sectored voice channel is high due to radio link error and other indicators are normal. 2Malfunction analysis Because the sector assignment failure rate and handover in failure rate are normal, it can’t be major equipment hardware error. The causes may be: geographic and environment effectsuch as blocking of new buildings, coverage, interference , feeder errorquality, height, pitch angle and direction angle etc, adjacent cell not defined, and unreasonable relevant parameters. Interference, feeder error, environment and coverage shall pay great attention to. 3Fault finding Standing wave ratio of feeder, feeder connector and antenna performance are in normal state; hardware of major equipment is normal; no decoding in propagation; cell parameter, hopping parameter, handover parameter and adjacent cell definition are all favorable. By doing DT and ABIS signaling analysis, we find that average receiving level of this sector is comparably high (-77dBm/uplink, -73dBm/uplink) while receiving quality is relatively bad(4.33/uplink, 3.25/downlink). When there is only one carrier function in the sector, call drop indicator and receiving quality are all in the normal range. By above analysis, we can decide that it’s caused by hopping frequency interference.

4troubleshooting

Use HP8921A to scanner uplink of the site, and find that spectrum of BCCH of the site is frequently covered by stronger spectrum. It shows that interference spectrum and simulative system spectrum is similar and HP8921A can demodulate voice signaling and find it’s due to co-channel interference of co-site simulative system. Correct frequency of the hopping being interfered and it will resume normal state.

5experience

When choosing site, we shall analyze the environment and make facility adjustment and parameter adjustment.

11.2

case two

1Error description Site with O3 model uses radio hopping and 1:3 hopping. When the site has finished capacity expansion( from O2 to O3),voice channel assignment failure rate remains high due to radio link error accompanied by high call drop and handover in failure rate. RACH decoding success rate , coding level, SDCCH immediate assignment success rate and call drop rate are normal. 2Malfunction analysis Assignment fail rate is accompanied by high call drop rate and handover in failure rate. There are two possibilities, one, error occurs when assigning voice channel, two, frequency or timeslot of this call may encounter interference or unsteadiness. Because RACH decoding success rate, decoding level are normal, SDCCH immediate assignment success rate and call drop rate are normal, we can decide that there are few chances for BCCH TRX and BCCH frequency error. From above, we can see there are great possibilities of error or interference of non-BCCH trx or frequency error. Therefore, we shall first check the equipment, then decide whether it’s due to interference by the help of traffic statistics analysis tool, DT coupled with parameter. 3Fault finding Check equipment hardware, feeder and propagation steadiness and no problem is found. By doing dialing test, we find that dialing success rate is low and voice quality is mostly bad. When checking the parameters we find that new MAIO is the same with MAIO of another carrier which caused clash during channel assignment and communication. That cause this result

4troubleshooting

Reset MAIO value of new TDMA.

5experience

After capacity expansion and update of the site, we shall check all the parameters and related data to avoid the same malfunction

11.3 case three

1Error description The urban site is in S333 model and use GSM900, frequency hopping and adopt 1:3 hopping. Handover failure rate in one sector of this site remains high, handover in fail rate from cell A to this cell reached 80%. Call drop rate and voice channel assignment failure rate are normal. 2Malfunction analysis We find that it’s not due to error and interference in hardware. First because although failure rate is high, there is no TCH assignment failure, which indicates MS can occupy voice channel assigned by BSC; secondly MS has no call drop and voice quality problem which indicates there are no severe interference. By analysis we find that source cell is far from this cell and it’s may be due to isolated island. 3Fault finding We find no problem in equipment hardware, propagation steadiness and interference. Then we investigate whether there are the same BSIC/BCCH in the surrounding cells of source cell A.

Finally we find cell B, has favorable radio propagation environment with cell A due to a square newly built between , and this leads to isolated island.

4troubleshooting

Make frequency planning of this cell again, adopt a new frequency and set cell B to be adjacent cell of cell A.

5Experience

We shall taken environment into consideration when handling network problem. If environment changes ,we shall adjust system software parameters(adding or deleting adjacent cells) and engineering parameterantenna height, pitch angle and direction angle. Due to limitation of GSM frequency, isolated island may become a big issue which we shall carefully handle. What’s more, if co-channel interferenceco-BCCHis severe, handover success rate will also be affected.

11.4 case four

1malfunction

One suburban site configuration is S444, use GSM900 and use frequency hopping and adopt 1:3 hopping model. The two sectors has some handover failure rate, assignment failure rate and call drop rate and no congestion. 2Malfunction analysis We shall check hardware equipment first. Then check the interference between the two cells and outside the system through parameter checking, traffic statistics report and DT test. Next check feeder faultsee call drop analysis)。 3Fault checking Check equipment hardware and find no error. Check MAIO, HSN, MA, handover parameter, co- channel and adjacent channel and find no inappropriate configuration. In DT report, the coverage of two sectors are found to be improper which is due to the reverse installation of the antenna.

4troubleshooting

Resume the antennae of the two sectors and the problem is resolved.

5Experience

Pay special attention to the quality when doing acceptance check.

11.5 Case five

1Malfunction description The site with O4 configuration and adopt frequency hopping, DTX and 13 hopping. Call drop of this cell keeps relatively high due to radio link error accompanied by relatively-high handover fail rate and assignment failure rate. 2Malfunction analysis See the analysis of case four. 3Fault finding Check equipment hardware and parameters and find no problems. OMC-R traffic statistics report reveals average receiving level of MS in this cell is relatively high (-85dBm/uplink and

-81dBm/uplink on average) and receiving quality is bad(-3.8/uplink and 3.15/downlink), which indicates there are probably great interference in the system. By investigation, we find that a repeater amplifies the signaling of this cell as well as the interferer signalingBCCH frequency of surrounding cell and frequency of the hoppingand co-channel and adjacent channel are introduced

4troubleshooting

Close DTX function of this cell, change hopping mode to non-hopping mode and do frequency planning again. Avoid using the same and adjacent frequency. Adjust handover parameter and power control parameters in order to avoid hopping.

5experience

Avoid using repeater where the same frequency or adjacent frequency may be used. Use micro- cell to resolve coverage issue.

11.6 case six

1Malfunction description The site with S777configuration uses hopping and DTX. The user around the site find it hard to dial both for originating MS and terminating MS, although MS signaling is strong. The originating MS will resume idle status indicating no signaling and terminating MS will prompt to be not in serving area. 2Malfunction analysis First make sure whether malfunction lies in one cell of the site, all cell of the site or no site’s problem at all. Judging from the malfunction, it’s hard for user to use signaling channel, therefore ,check whether SDCCH is congested. Otherwise, check whether there is severe interference. If the above are fairly good, check hardware, parameters and feeder. 3Malfunction checking and troubleshooting Through the analysis of OMC-R traffic statistics report, we find there is no congestion in this site. But the report of one sector is abnormal. The report shows that SDCCH immediate assignment times are dozen including area update while TCH assignment times is several hundred with most handover in assignment. Close this cell and network resumes its normal working state. Do DT test and find no interference, and do cell parameter check again no problem is found. Change one control panel and the problem disappears.

11.7 Case seven

1Error description One subscriber along the border of two provinces complains that although there is no problem concerning roaming in his dwelling, but once he received roaming signaling from other province and can’t away from the signaling. The two provinces are not adjacent to each other. 2Malfunction analysis Through DT of this region, the network structure is showed in 7-15

Figure 15 network structure along the border

The subscriber usually stand at P and reside at cell A, Cell A and B are adjacent cells and are

affiliated to user network. Cell C and D are adjacent cells and belong to roaming network. Cell

A has no adjacent relationship with cell C and D.

Because cell D and Cell B defined by A uses the same BCCH frequency, MS at P reselects cell

D and back to cell C later. But there is no frequency of cell A in adjacent cell table of cell C and

D, therefore, user keeps staying in the network of roaming area. When MS powers off in cell C and powers on again, it keeps stay in cell C and its adjacent cells. This is called roaming.

3Troubleshooting

Define adjacent cells of the two provinces. If it can’t be realized, change frequency of cell B.

11.8 Case eight

1Malfunction description Urban subscriber find that although MS has signaling, but when being paged, recording prompts it to be not in serving area. 2Malfunction analysis Check whether the network has problems such as signaling channel congestion, frequent location update and immediate assignment failure. Check whether T3212 is too small 3Malfunction check Through investigation, we find that there are two LAC in the urban area and cell location update along the border of LAC is frequent, which leads to signaling channel congestion. One reason is some terminated MS can’t use SDCCH, thus paging is overtime, another reason is that MS is paged when doing location update, and can’t respond timely, which results in paging overtime.

4Troubleshooting

Make planning of the location area, avoid setting borders to be area with frequent cell reselection, and assign signaling channel to the cells in the boundary area as many as possible.