Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Name: ID:
Source: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), Australian Curriculum v3.0: Science for Foundation10, <www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Science/Curriculum/F-10>.
PART TWO
Modifying the unit: When making adjustments to the unit, use the strike out to omit words. Then
write the new information and highlight it. Write the justification in the sections provided.
School name Unit title Duration of unit
Our School Matter matters One term
Unit outline
Students broaden their classification of matter to include gases and begin to see how matter structures the world around them. They test predictions relating to the
behaviour of solids, liquids and gases by conducting investigations focused on the observable properties and behaviours of solid, liquids and gases.
Questions that shape the inquiry include:
What are examples of everyday substances that exist as a solid, liquid or gas?
Justification: The use of a Round Robin activity allows students learn from their peers, as well as
contribute their own knowledge in a low risk activity. ESLD students, or those with low literacy levels
often feel self-conscious in adding to class discussion, however in this activity they can see what
others students have written and begin to contribute their own ideas. The word wall that includes
other languages and images also supports ESLD students and others with literacy needs. Tompkins
et all suggest that teachers support these students using images and other visuals such as artefacts
and videos. They also suggest that teachers preteach and discuss big ideas and key vocabulary to
help student participation and maximise learning for ESLD students (Tompkins, Campbell, Green, &
Justification:
Having group or pair investigations as well as teacher demonstrations allows for the use of a range of
groupings to enhance the earning of students. The learning environment is very important to differentiating,
and thus students must be given opportunities to work as a whole class, large and small groups, and
individually (Maker, 2017). The teacher writing the points up on the board during discussions allows students
to be think about the big ideas and concepts of what theyre learning whilst recording in the science journal,
Justification:
Students work in groups to brainstorm explanations of observations so that they have a chance to learn
from each other. Students are grouped according to their strengths and needs, giving them the
opportunity to teach their peers, as well as learn from them (Sousa & Tomlinson, 2011). The learning
environment is very important to differentiating, and thus students must be given opportunities to work
as a whole class, large and small groups, and individually (Maker, 2017). By modelling the annotated
Justification:
Having a discussion of measuring mass once again revises previous learning, and allows students the opportunity
to ask any questions they have to clarify their learning. Allowing multiple opportunities for learning and practice
enhances the learning of students with varying needs (Maker, 2017). Maker highlights that in order to differentiate
the learning to meet the needs of many students, teaching and learning should be interest centred that
encourages students to explore subsets of the class topic that interests them (2017).
Evaluate Student parings will be
Investigate composite materials that cannot be easily classified as solids, liquids deliberate based on Numeracy
or gases on the basis of their observable properties, e.g. shaving foam. strengths.
Discuss the properties and behaviour of the foam. Whole class discussion, then Students research sublimation
pair discussion and recording in science journals. and choose a substance that they
Research how these new composite materials are used and why their are interested in to
properties are important to their use. Students can research through books,
websites, videos and images
Justification:
By having a whole class discussion and then a pair discussion before recording in their science journals
allows for more time to consolidate learning before having to do any recording (Tomlinson, 2014). The
whole class discussion can also support ESLD learners and students who have literacy needs as the
teacher can use visual prompts such as pictures and artefacts (Tompkins, Campbell, Green, & Smith,
2015). Students can also work in pairs whilst recording in their journals so that students who have
literacy needs can be supported by students who have a strength in literacy. Students are paired
according to their strengths and needs, giving them the opportunity to teach their peers, as well as learn
from them (Sousa & Tomlinson, 2011). This research activity supports learners with literacy needs, as
well as ESLD students as they have many mediums through which they can conduct research, from
images and videos to books and websites. This allows for multiple entry points as well, as the research
is student directed, so the level of research can reflect the level of learning the student is currently at
(Tomlinson, 2014).
Feedback to students Teachers plan opportunities through the teaching strategies and learning experiences of the unit. Teachers provide ongoing
feedback and encouragement to students on their strengths and areas for improvement. Through particular learning experiences
students can reflect on and discuss with their teachers and peers what they are able to do well and what they need to do to
improve, e.g. identifying patterns and trends in experimental data, reflecting on how to improve the design of an investigation.
Justification: I have not made many changes to how the feedback would be given to students
as this approach allows for differentiated feedback that is ongoing throughout the unit,
allowing students to reflect on areas for their improvement. The only part I would change is
for the feedback to include not only areas for improvements, but strategies on how to
improve (William, 2016).
Reflection on the unit plan At the conclusion of the unit all teachers who have been involved in planning, teaching, learning and assessment come together to
reflect on the successes and challenges of the unit. They come with their personal reflections through answers to the following
questions:
What worked well in this unit?
Why did this work well?
What was a stumbling block?
Why was it a stumbling block?
How would you refine it?
What trends and gaps in learning have you identified?
How will you build on these learning experiences next term and beyond?
References
Maker, C. (2017, August 30). EDU318 - Professional Practice - The Inquiring Teacher - Differentiation Resources. Retrieved from BlackBoard:
https://online.usc.edu.au/bbcswebdav/pid-1289007-dt-content-rid-
6767348_2/courses/EDU318_2017_Semester_2/EDU318_2016_Semester_2_ImportedContent_20160706122849(7)/EDU318_2015_Semester_1_I
mportedContent_20150120013115(5)/EDU318_2014_Semester_1_ImportedConte
Sousa, D. A., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2011). Differentiation and the Brain. Indianna: Solution Tree Press.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.
Tompkins, G., Campbell, R., Green, D., & Smith, C. (2015). Literacy for the 21st Century. Melbourne: Pearson Australia.
William, D. (Director). (2016). Formative Assessment [Motion Picture].
Class 5W Profile